I saw this in #modreqs. Let's go!
[R e d's Easy]
There aren't many stuff to point out here, it's quite neat. But honestly, this diff felt like a Normal, prolly due to some patterns, but well...
01:01:010 (1,2,3,4) - I've noticed you've been caring about the aesthetics in your diff. But tbh, this one is kinda odd compared to the rest. I'm not talking about the type of curve, just the position of the notes after them (they're not aligned, as in many other similar formations). I'd be nice if you could do sth like THIS.
01:07:410 (1,2,3) - Be careful here: (1)'s sliderbody+hitburst are overlapping (3)'s reverse arrow, which must be fully visible.
01:12:210 (1,2,3,4) - This is a clear example of "hard" pattern for an Easy, which makes your star rate arise. Try what you did before in 00:32:210 (1,2), just place 2 1/1 sliders here.
[Crimmi's Normal]
00:11:410 (1,2) - 1+1/2 long sliders with a repetition? Those would fit better if this was an Easy, but they don't make much sense here. 2 1/1 sliders with 2 repetitions, or 4 1/1 ones would be better than what you have atm.
00:24:210 (5) - NC. This arc can be made better to fit in (4)'s approach circle. This way, the distance (4,5) will be increased from that 0,87x you currently have, but you may need to change a bit the position of the next slider(s). I'll leave the code of it too, if you like it:
00:44:610 (4) - Instead of the current stack you have, you can put it in the same position as (2), and flip it vertically.
00:45:010 (1,2,3) - (3) isn't properly shaped imo. I'll let you some ideas for those 3 sliders here:
[Hard]
00:14:610 (1,3) - You're trying to put a similar curve to both sliders, but due to the different lenght of them the result is a bit strange... You can try varying one of them like you did later on 00:54:610 (1,3).
00:21:010 (1,3) - ^
00:15:810 (2) - A N-whistle fits perfectly in the repetition of that slider.
00:22:210 (2) - ^
00:55:810 (2) - ^
01:02:210 (2) - ^
00:30:210 (4,5,1,2,3) - 5 stacked notes are a bit boring. There are tons of creative posibilities instead of that...
01:10:210 (4,5,1,2,3) - ^
00:36:610 (3,4,1,2) - 4 stacked notes here. It'd be better if you divide them in 2 groups of 2 stacked notes (which would match with that NC you have).
01:16:610 (4,5,1,2) - ^
01:15:210 (3,1,2) - Instead of that, you can try a kind of slider like you have in 00:35:210 (1).
[Insane]
I have to agree with Garven here: There's not a real change of intensity in those 0.65x parts. Maybe it was added to make a higher diferentation with the kiai time (1.20x). Nevertheless, those 0.65x could be probably better at 0.75-0.80x if you wanna keep that effect.
00:04:810 (6,7,1) - It's kinda odd that this stack finishes in a NC. But as it's necessary because of the stanza change, you may consider converting (1,2) into a single 1/2 long slider.
00:11:210 (7,8,1) - ^
00:44:810 (6,7,1) - ^
00:51:210 (6,7,1) - ^
00:06:410 (10,11,1,2,3) - Again, it's strange to see a NC exactly there (but it's needed). Consider making an abrupt change of the direction of that 5-note-stream when the NC starts, to make a better effect.
00:12:810 (10,11,1,2,3) - ^
00:14:410 (11,1) - Be careful with the speed change here, as it can lead to confusions. You've placed (1) quite close to (11) due to that inherited section, but to make a proper placement of (1), it should be at ~1.75x distance of the previous slider.
00:54:410 (11,1) - ^
00:14:610 (1,2) - To be honest, that timeline can be much better like THIS. The current sliders don't fit really well in an Insane.
00:21:010 (1,2) - ^
00:54:610 (1,2) - ^
01:01:010 (1,2) - ^
01:10:610 (1,2,3,4) - You could give a try with THIS formation to avoid the stack (3,4). (4) is just flipped vertically, (2) fit inside that curve, and (1,3) could be placed symmetrically.
[Dunskin's Muzukashii]
00:31:610 (19,20,21) - Doesn't this sound better as "k d d", instead of "d k d"?
00:38:010 (18,19,20) - ^
[Dunskin's Oni]
00:29:210 (13,14,15,16) - kd dk?
Hard and Insane need a bit more of attention imo... Good luck with this song!
[R e d's Easy]
There aren't many stuff to point out here, it's quite neat. But honestly, this diff felt like a Normal, prolly due to some patterns, but well...
01:01:010 (1,2,3,4) - I've noticed you've been caring about the aesthetics in your diff. But tbh, this one is kinda odd compared to the rest. I'm not talking about the type of curve, just the position of the notes after them (they're not aligned, as in many other similar formations). I'd be nice if you could do sth like THIS.
01:07:410 (1,2,3) - Be careful here: (1)'s sliderbody+hitburst are overlapping (3)'s reverse arrow, which must be fully visible.
01:12:210 (1,2,3,4) - This is a clear example of "hard" pattern for an Easy, which makes your star rate arise. Try what you did before in 00:32:210 (1,2), just place 2 1/1 sliders here.
[Crimmi's Normal]
00:11:410 (1,2) - 1+1/2 long sliders with a repetition? Those would fit better if this was an Easy, but they don't make much sense here. 2 1/1 sliders with 2 repetitions, or 4 1/1 ones would be better than what you have atm.
00:24:210 (5) - NC. This arc can be made better to fit in (4)'s approach circle. This way, the distance (4,5) will be increased from that 0,87x you currently have, but you may need to change a bit the position of the next slider(s). I'll leave the code of it too, if you like it:
SPOILER
00:29:010 (3) - NC.144,192,24210,2,0,B|144:264|256:364|368:264|368:192,1,330,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
00:44:610 (4) - Instead of the current stack you have, you can put it in the same position as (2), and flip it vertically.
00:45:010 (1,2,3) - (3) isn't properly shaped imo. I'll let you some ideas for those 3 sliders here:
SPOILER
00:54:610 (1,2) - Same as before, these sliders don't really fit here mainly due to the amount of repetitions. I highly recommend to split them.176,192,45010,6,0,B|184:304,1,110,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
328,301,45810,2,0,B|336:192,1,110,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
332,56,46610,2,0,B|256:28|256:28|176:56,2,165,4|0|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0
[Hard]
00:14:610 (1,3) - You're trying to put a similar curve to both sliders, but due to the different lenght of them the result is a bit strange... You can try varying one of them like you did later on 00:54:610 (1,3).
00:21:010 (1,3) - ^
00:15:810 (2) - A N-whistle fits perfectly in the repetition of that slider.
00:22:210 (2) - ^
00:55:810 (2) - ^
01:02:210 (2) - ^
00:30:210 (4,5,1,2,3) - 5 stacked notes are a bit boring. There are tons of creative posibilities instead of that...
01:10:210 (4,5,1,2,3) - ^
00:36:610 (3,4,1,2) - 4 stacked notes here. It'd be better if you divide them in 2 groups of 2 stacked notes (which would match with that NC you have).
01:16:610 (4,5,1,2) - ^
01:15:210 (3,1,2) - Instead of that, you can try a kind of slider like you have in 00:35:210 (1).
[Insane]
I have to agree with Garven here: There's not a real change of intensity in those 0.65x parts. Maybe it was added to make a higher diferentation with the kiai time (1.20x). Nevertheless, those 0.65x could be probably better at 0.75-0.80x if you wanna keep that effect.
00:04:810 (6,7,1) - It's kinda odd that this stack finishes in a NC. But as it's necessary because of the stanza change, you may consider converting (1,2) into a single 1/2 long slider.
00:11:210 (7,8,1) - ^
00:44:810 (6,7,1) - ^
00:51:210 (6,7,1) - ^
00:06:410 (10,11,1,2,3) - Again, it's strange to see a NC exactly there (but it's needed). Consider making an abrupt change of the direction of that 5-note-stream when the NC starts, to make a better effect.
00:12:810 (10,11,1,2,3) - ^
00:14:410 (11,1) - Be careful with the speed change here, as it can lead to confusions. You've placed (1) quite close to (11) due to that inherited section, but to make a proper placement of (1), it should be at ~1.75x distance of the previous slider.
00:54:410 (11,1) - ^
00:14:610 (1,2) - To be honest, that timeline can be much better like THIS. The current sliders don't fit really well in an Insane.
00:21:010 (1,2) - ^
00:54:610 (1,2) - ^
01:01:010 (1,2) - ^
01:10:610 (1,2,3,4) - You could give a try with THIS formation to avoid the stack (3,4). (4) is just flipped vertically, (2) fit inside that curve, and (1,3) could be placed symmetrically.
[Dunskin's Muzukashii]
00:31:610 (19,20,21) - Doesn't this sound better as "k d d", instead of "d k d"?
00:38:010 (18,19,20) - ^
[Dunskin's Oni]
00:29:210 (13,14,15,16) - kd dk?
Hard and Insane need a bit more of attention imo... Good luck with this song!