Derekku wrote:

[Kurosanyan's Taiko Oni]
*Goodness the hitsound volume is really overpowering the music! Please lower all sections to around 60-65% volume. Alternatively, you could make the non-chorus sections softer (e.g. 60%) and the chorus sections louder (e.g. 70%) to give some variance! Yeah, fix'd
02:39:999 (1) and 02:45:517 (3) - I'm a bit confused as to why only two sliders were used in this entire map. If you only wanted to use a few (and in a certain part of the map), then at least add a couple more. Right now these don't really seem to have a purpose and I'd love to see a few more. It's because I wanted to make it different but there's only those 2 fitting imo, dunno D:

1. Since you are using OD8, you shouldn't use HP drain 6. If you use OD8 it because you want the map to be challenging, however with HP drain 6 it becomes easier. This map is going to approval, so use HP drain 7 at least, it makes more sense.
2. 00:13:793 (1) - Why aren't you doing a jump here as what you have done at 00:11:034 (1) - 00:08:275 (1) - 00:05:517 (1). For the sake of consistency, you should make a jump with this note too.
3. 00:19:310 (1) - ^
4. 00:33:103 (1) - ^
5. 00:36:551 (2) - The reverse arrow of this slider is hidden by the combo number at the left-bottom side of the screen, please make it visible to prevent the player to be confused by this.
6. 00:50:517 (4,5) - Why are you suddenly changing the spacing in the pattern ? That doesn't really make sense to. Maybe you tried to emphasize the loud beats ? If it is the case, an anti-jump doesn't really emphasize them.
7. 01:11:034 (4) - I'd add a whistle on the reverse, sounds better with the vocals.
8. 01:13:793 (3) - ^
9. 01:16:551 (1,2) - The jump between those 2 sliders is kinda huge. Too huge in comparison to the music. Try to fix that please.
10. 01:24:827 (3) - As before, add a whistle on the reverse ?
11. 01:23:965 (8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2) - This pattern is kinda messy. That is to say all those notes are concentrated in the same area of the playfield which means that some notes are covered by previous notes' hitbursts. (Which makes the pattern harder to read and not really comfortable to play). Therefore try to re-arrange this pattern.
12. 01:30:344 (3) - Whistle on the reverse again ?
13. 01:35:862 (2) - ^
14. 01:41:551 (3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - The beginning of this stream doesn't sound good to me. In my opinion the stream should start at 01:41:724 so remove 01:41:637 (4) ?
15. 01:48:275 (4) - Whistle on the reverse again ?
16. 03:21:206 (3) - In my opinion it would play better if you crtl+R'ed it. Like this :
    
    SPOILER

    
17. 03:26:206 (4) - Whistle on the reverse.
18. 03:32:241 (1) - Add a whistle on the beginning of this slider, it sounds so much better.
19. 03:42:758 (3) - Whistle on the reverse.
20. 03:48:275 (3) - ^
21. 04:03:879 (6,7,8) - Not a good idea to cross those notes with 04:02:931 (4,5,6). That make them harder to read cause they're covered by the hitbursts.
22. 04:34:137 - A note is really needed here, because of the loud beat. Without anything here, it plays very awkwards. So instead of having a circle at 04:34:310, add a circle at 04:34:137.
23. 04:39:655 - ^
24. 04:42:413 - ^

1. Mod in French because it is easier.
2. 01:26:379 (3) - Si je suis ce que tu as fait précédemment, cette note devrait être un katsu et 01:27:413 (2) un don.
3. 01:29:482 (3) - Ce qui inclus que cette note devrait être un don.
4. 01:40:344 (2,1,1,1,1,1) - ddkkd sonne beaucoup mieux ici je trouve.
5. 03:21:896 (2) - Ce katsu va pas bien principalement car tu as un gros katsu juste avant. Perso, un don irait beaucoup mieux je trouve, ça sonne moins artificiel.
6. 03:27:758 (1,1,1) - Après un dkd, je trouve que un kdk sonne bizarre dans la majorité des cas. Donc change le kdk en ddk plutôt ? Ça sonne mieux et ça se joue mieux en prime.
7. 03:30:517 (1,2,3,4) - kkd k plutôt ?
8. 03:36:034 (1,1,1) - ddk pour la même raison qu'avant ?

• For the green valleys where dragons fly,

• [list:0f3a3]For the glory the power to win the black lord,

• [list:0f3a3][list:0f3a3]I will search for the emerald sword.

• [list:0f3a3][list:0f3a3][list:0f3a3]Amen.

Kurai wrote:

Hello, random bubble check.

[Insane]

1. Since you are using OD8, you shouldn't use HP drain 6. If you use OD8 it because you want the map to be challenging, however with HP drain 6 it becomes easier. This map is going to approval, so use HP drain 7 at least, it makes more sense. okay
2. 00:13:793 (1) - Why aren't you doing a jump here as what you have done at 00:11:034 (1) - 00:08:275 (1) - 00:05:517 (1). For the sake of consistency, you should make a jump with this note too. okay
3. 00:19:310 (1) - ^ ^
4. 00:33:103 (1) - ^ ^
5. 00:36:551 (2) - The reverse arrow of this slider is hidden by the combo number at the left-bottom side of the screen, please make it visible to prevent the player to be confused by this. wow, I have never though of this possibility
6. 00:50:517 (4,5) - Why are you suddenly changing the spacing in the pattern ? That doesn't really make sense to. Maybe you tried to emphasize the loud beats ? If it is the case, an anti-jump doesn't really emphasize them. I intended nothing with the spacing here, I just wanted to make an interesting pattern. Well, I increased the spacing a little bit now although the symmetry is gone then
7. 01:11:034 (4) - I'd add a whistle on the reverse, sounds better with the vocals. nah, I have my pattern of placing whistles already and this wouldn't fit it (it interfers with the background beat)
8. 01:13:793 (3) - ^ ^
9. 01:16:551 (1,2) - The jump between those 2 sliders is kinda huge. Too huge in comparison to the music. Try to fix that please. hm, it doesn't look so good anymore now I think (the angle D:)
10. 01:24:827 (3) - As before, add a whistle on the reverse ? no
11. 01:23:965 (8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2) - This pattern is kinda messy. That is to say all those notes are concentrated in the same area of the playfield which means that some notes are covered by previous notes' hitbursts. (Which makes the pattern harder to read and not really comfortable to play). Therefore try to re-arrange this pattern. Yes, I understand your reasoning, it is in fact very clustered. But I really like the choice of circles/sliders here and their shape aswell. I can't find any way of re-arranging them which looks and feels even nearly as good as it is now.
12. 01:30:344 (3) - Whistle on the reverse again ? no
13. 01:35:862 (2) - ^ no
14. 01:41:551 (3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - The beginning of this stream doesn't sound good to me. In my opinion the stream should start at 01:41:724 so remove 01:41:637 (4) ? for me the drums in the background start "streaming" at 01:41:551, so I let the stream start from there
15. 01:48:275 (4) - Whistle on the reverse again ? no
16. 03:21:206 (3) - In my opinion it would play better if you crtl+R'ed it. Like this well, I think is better with this segment sliders since the lyrics and the music are somewhat going forward (meh, hard to explain):
    
    SPOILER

    
17. 03:26:206 (4) - Whistle on the reverse. no
18. 03:32:241 (1) - Add a whistle on the beginning of this slider, it sounds so much better. well, I don't really like interrupting my usual whistle pattern, but okay
19. 03:42:758 (3) - Whistle on the reverse. no
20. 03:48:275 (3) - ^ no
21. 04:03:879 (6,7,8) - Not a good idea to cross those notes with 04:02:931 (4,5,6). That make them harder to read cause they're covered by the hitbursts. I hope it is better now
22. 04:34:137 - A note is really needed here, because of the loud beat. Without anything here, it plays very awkwards. So instead of having a circle at 04:34:310, add a circle at 04:34:137. Well, I have a circle 1/8 after your desired point because in my opinion this beat is even heavier. And when I mapped this part the very first time I already considered adding a circle there, too. But in my opinion this is just to much then, too crammed. And I don't want to move the following circle to your desired time because as already said the following beat is much more important for me.
23. 04:39:655 - ^ ^
24. 04:42:413 - ^ ^

Well, popped for now.

iMercurial wrote:

LET'S FUCKING FLAME

Kurai wrote:

[Kurosanyan's Taiko Oni]

1. Mod in French because it is easier. k
2. 01:26:379 (3) - Si je suis ce que tu as fait précédemment, cette note devrait être un katsu et 01:27:413 (2) un don. k
3. 01:29:482 (3) - Ce qui inclus que cette note devrait être un don. Nope
4. 01:40:344 (2,1,1,1,1,1) - ddkkd sonne beaucoup mieux ici je trouve. Nope, le rythme est plus cool dans l'ensemble avec un dkdkd ici je trouve.
5. 03:21:896 (2) - Ce katsu va pas bien principalement car tu as un gros katsu juste avant. Perso, un don irait beaucoup mieux je trouve, ça sonne moins artificiel. Done
6. 03:27:758 (1,1,1) - Après un dkd, je trouve que un kdk sonne bizarre dans la majorité des cas. Donc change le kdk en ddk plutôt ? Ça sonne mieux et ça se joue mieux en prime. Je suis le pattern que j'ai fais dans la partie précédente et qui permet de différencier chaque passage donc non (ça ferait que des dkd ddk kkd sinon)
7. 03:30:517 (1,2,3,4) - kkd k plutôt ? Nope, plus ou moins la même raison, la musique est déjà assez répétitive comme ça. :v
8. 03:36:034 (1,1,1) - ddk pour la même raison qu'avant ? Nope pour la même raison qu'avant.

.

Tshemmp wrote:

Kurai wrote:

[Insane]

1. 01:23:965 (8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2) - This pattern is kinda messy. That is to say all those notes are concentrated in the same area of the playfield which means that some notes are covered by previous notes' hitbursts. (Which makes the pattern harder to read and not really comfortable to play). Therefore try to re-arrange this pattern. Yes, I understand your reasoning, it is in fact very clustered. But I really like the choice of circles/sliders here and their shape aswell. I can't find any way of re-arranging them which looks and feels even nearly as good as it is now.
   Well, this is mainly 01:26:379 (8) that bothers me here because it is placed at the worst place possible, thus you could at least try to put it somewhere else, this is really a total mess here.
2. 04:34:137 - A note is really needed here, because of the loud beat. Without anything here, it plays very awkwards. So instead of having a circle at 04:34:310, add a circle at 04:34:137. Well, I have a circle 1/8 after your desired point because in my opinion this beat is even heavier. And when I mapped this part the very first time I already considered adding a circle there, too. But in my opinion this is just to much then, too crammed. And I don't want to move the following circle to your desired time because as already said the following beat is much more important for me.
   So why have you fixed it ? D:

Tshemmp wrote:

Kurai wrote:

[Insane]

1. 01:23:965 (8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2) - This pattern is kinda messy. That is to say all those notes are concentrated in the same area of the playfield which means that some notes are covered by previous notes' hitbursts. (Which makes the pattern harder to read and not really comfortable to play). Therefore try to re-arrange this pattern. Yes, I understand your reasoning, it is in fact very clustered. But I really like the choice of circles/sliders here and their shape aswell. I can't find any way of re-arranging them which looks and feels even nearly as good as it is now.
   Well, this is mainly 01:26:379 (8) that bothers me here because it is placed at the worst place possible, thus you could at least try to put it somewhere else, this is really a total mess here. Okay, I think I've found a solution for this.
2. 04:34:137 - A note is really needed here, because of the loud beat. Without anything here, it plays very awkwards. So instead of having a circle at 04:34:310, add a circle at 04:34:137. Well, I have a circle 1/8 after your desired point because in my opinion this beat is even heavier. And when I mapped this part the very first time I already considered adding a circle there, too. But in my opinion this is just to much then, too crammed. And I don't want to move the following circle to your desired time because as already said the following beat is much more important for me.
   So why have you fixed it ? D: lol, I didn't want to, I probably tried it out and forgot to set it back.

CDFA wrote:

Jordan wrote:

CDFA wrote:

dimitri12 wrote:

Hi, I am very sorry that this beatmap is made only 5 star and no other options, I would like to see that there is a four-star or four and a half.

  mvg.