1. osu! forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked/Approved Beatmaps
show more
posted

Jaye wrote:

Just had a look at this map in the editor and I have to say I love it.
I've shot two stars for you just now and I'll be back with a mod later.
Thank~!!
I gived kudosu
I will wait you mod
posted

davidminh0111 wrote:

Hello Cocoaaa, request via in-game:

[General]
Since you changed your diff name, you need to write 'redl before the date you changed the diff name' :3

[Timing alert!]
  1. 00:22:798: Why did you use 3/4 meter, listen again, does it fit to the music. Absolutely no, please change it after finish the mod down here. it's JUDYDANNY's mod


[Fight]
^^^ Diff name ^^^ not a big deal

  1. 00:17:464: Change to d because melody pitch is low I follow all music
  2. 00:21:464: From here you did not make the SV smooth, I would recommend you to add up by x0.01 only, wouldn't it smooth. Or maybe you want to increase the slowness of the beginning of the music to make this SV smoother, the current one isn't smooth enough. Consider change it by 2 ways, choose 1 way you would like to choose
  3. 00:41:047: Remove this, no sound, even though is feel weird, but 7plet isn't a best idea you could do. It's too sudden my pattern look better
  4. 00:49:047: ^ ^
  5. 01:14:296: Remove finisher, I don't get what is the Finisher note for? remove
  6. 02:15:881: Change to d for an easier keyboard-ish (easier to hit) no
  7. 03:24:463: SV isn't smooth it's feel that but don't change
  8. 03:35:464: ^ ^
  9. 03:38:964: Change to k to fit the pitch ha?
  10. 03:46:130: SV from here is too sudden, reduce the SV speed it's look normal for high diffi
  11. 05:15:463: Try to use 50% playback rate to listen the melody pitch carefully. It should be dkdk not kddk dkkd and move
  12. 05:25:463: Why not k? why:)?


I think this map need a skilled modder than me.
In the current state it will be far from ranked
We can still improve
Good luck
thank you!

xtrem3x wrote:

M4M from my Queue


General:

Don = d
Kat = k
Big Don = D
Big Kat = K



  • > kiai time unsnapped, move 1ms back 02:49:798- and 02:55:131- oh thanks


    00:10:631- It's a bit deformed here because I don't focus that you try to follow. my suggestion would be change to d this point and make a swap in 00:11:798 (24,25)- to focus more decuately the piano sound. ::

    00:13:631 - -->
    Is the same situation as above point. wow it's look better ok

    00:22:631 - it might be best to prioritize the big note at this point, so change this to k. already

    01:06:464 (361,362,363,364,365) - I would prefer you to change this by kkkdk to increase the emphasis of the piano sounds.

    01:12:798 (402,403,404,405) - this section have much cymbal, is possible DDKK? no

    02:27:020 (997,998) - Delete these notes and ... why?
    02:27:797 - -->
    **these points above are to reduce the density a bit and eliminate the unnecessary use of 1/6 format notes on sound that does not have that rhythm, in addition to properly following the piano sound just before starting kiai**.

    03:20:464 - Leave this note in k to emphatize next note as finish in these chaos patterns (?) this low sound

    03:57:380 - this note is more coupled to the set of low sounds than high, then this would be d. oh yeah change pattern
Thanks you!!
posted

Jaye wrote:

Just had a look at this map in the editor and I have to say I love it.
I've shot two stars for you just now and I'll be back with a mod later.

NM from my queue: [Fight]
  1. 00:54:713 - Could connect the 1/6 here by adding a d and making the finisher a K, so it reads as --> ddkddkkdkd(dkkd)dK I don't need ddK or kkD it's look hard but change to K
  2. 00:57:130 - k? kkd
  3. 00:59:463 - change to kdkkd or kdkdd to emphasise pitch decline (even though kdkdk works too I guess but not as well) no now kdkdk look good than
  4. 01:00:130 - implying you use the above suggestion ^ as a kdkkd, then a kdkdd would fit this as it is the same sounds as the pattern above, but lower pitch (which is why I recommend kdkdd since it uses more dons for lower pitch) no
  5. 01:02:796 - could be k I want to use beautiful pattern
  6. 01:04:130 - I suggest kdd since it's pretty lower and the extra don emphasises that ^
  7. 01:09:130 - perhaps try making this section a stream; it fits the music and there is a calmer section almost immediately after so it shouldn't feel awkward to play ha no K look better
  8. These streams are awesome 8-)
  9. 02:25:463 - perhaps add a small bit of variety to these ten notes; I found kkkdk kdkkk to be quite interesting I want it's easy pattern
  10. 02:27:797 - as much as I like 1/6, I don't think this needs to be here; nothing in the music asks for this to be a 1/6 but I need 3
  11. 03:50:297 - this note for some reason has a different hitsound? just replace it with another kat to fix (it's not really an issue but it bothers me lmao) WTF hit sound
  12. 04:43:213 - k? K


That's about all I can think of; best of luck ('w^)b
thank you very much!!
posted
Hi!
M4M from my queue ~
Some clarifications:
  • k = kat d = don K = big kat D = big don
  1. It's just suggestions/corrections, don't take it badly. You are free to accept them or not.
  2. If you accept my suggestions/corrections, apply also in similar parts for consistency
  3. If you don't accept my suggestions/corrections, clarify why you do not accept them.
[
Fight
]
  1. 00:01:465 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - I think would be fine if you set those as kdkk, kddk and dddk for emphasizes the melody decrease
  2. 00:11:631 (23) - Change to don, the pitch is low compared to 00:10:798 (18) -
  3. 00:13:631 (30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40) - I think this fits better with the piano pitch
  4. 00:17:131 (47,48) - Ctrl + G. The pitch in 00:17:131 (47) - is more low than 00:17:298 (47) -
  5. 00:21:631 - The SVs here are too fast and can be too confuse, you need improve it. SV's with x0,05 increase could be fine in the white tick, but you need remove 00:22:215 (69,71) - since feels a bit overmapped. I listen only the piano and the transition filter is doesn't too good to mapping
  6. 00:22:798 - If you use 3/4 meter you need emphasizes some with ticks. Like example removing 00:23:964 (80) - or 00:24:964 (85) - (example)
  7. 00:40:965 (167,168,169,170,171,172,173) - It feels too unexpected, since you are following the piano and that pattern break with that. You can remove this 00:41:215 (170,172) - as to make an advance for 00:58:297 (282,283,284,285,286,287,288) -
  8. 00:53:798 (241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248) - I'm sure it follow better with the piano pitch
  9. 00:54:464 (249,250,251,252) - I don't know why you used 1/6 patter, I'm confidence that it's 1/4.
  10. 01:34:631 (560) - Remove. I don't listen a sound to follow
  11. 02:26:796 - I would think the 1/6 use here. I think this 02:26:964 (965,966,967,968,969,970,971) - is unnecessary since this 02:26:881 (964,965,966,967) - don't have a instrumental to follow
  12. 02:51:964 (1206,1208) - You are emphasizing the strong pitch in 02:50:798 (1201,1203,1205) - and this 02:51:963 (1206,1208) - breaks with that, remove
  13. 02:56:130 - It's some inconsistent with 02:55:130 (1221,1222,1223,1224,1225,1226,1227,1228) - .Try with this pattern
  14. 02:58:297 (1250) - Remove finisher, I don't listen a crash cymbal
  15. 03:36:130 (37) - Remove finisher, same as above
That's all from me, nice map~
Good luck!
posted

gaston_2199 wrote:

Hi!
M4M from my queue ~
Some clarifications:
  • k = kat d = don K = big kat D = big don
  1. It's just suggestions/corrections, don't take it badly. You are free to accept them or not.
  2. If you accept my suggestions/corrections, apply also in similar parts for consistency
  3. If you don't accept my suggestions/corrections, clarify why you do not accept them.
[
Fight
]
  1. 00:01:465 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - I think would be fine if you set those as kdkk, kddk and dddk for emphasizes the melody decrease no,I think this fine now
  2. 00:11:631 (23) - Change to don, the pitch is low compared to 00:10:798 (18) - yeah
  3. 00:13:631 (30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40) - I think this fits better with the piano pitch maybe lol
  4. 00:17:131 (47,48) - Ctrl + G. The pitch in 00:17:131 (47) - is more low than 00:17:298 (47) - no
  5. 00:21:631 - The SVs here are too fast and can be too confuse, you need improve it. SV's with x0,05 increase could be fine in the white tick, but you need remove 00:22:215 (69,71) - since feels a bit overmapped. I listen only the piano and the transition filter is doesn't too good to mapping remove and fix SV
  6. 00:22:798 - If you use 3/4 meter you need emphasizes some with ticks. Like example removing 00:23:964 (80) - or 00:24:964 (85) - change some pattern(example)
  7. 00:40:965 (167,168,169,170,171,172,173) - It feels too unexpected, since you are following the piano and that pattern break with that. You can remove this 00:41:215 (170,172) - as to make an advance for 00:58:297 (282,283,284,285,286,287,288) - nahhh
  8. 00:53:798 (241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248) - I'm sure it follow better with the piano pitch feel better..
  9. 00:54:464 (249,250,251,252) - I don't know why you used 1/6 patter, I'm confidence that it's 1/4. change some and it's 1/6
  10. 01:34:631 (560) - Remove. I don't listen a sound to follow remove
  11. 02:26:796 - I would think the 1/6 use here. I think this 02:26:964 (965,966,967,968,969,970,971) - is unnecessary since this 02:26:881 (964,965,966,967) - don't have a instrumental to follow I think this not1/6
  12. 02:51:964 (1206,1208) - You are emphasizing the strong pitch in 02:50:798 (1201,1203,1205) - and this 02:51:963 (1206,1208) - breaks with that, remove no
  13. 02:56:130 - It's some inconsistent with 02:55:130 (1221,1222,1223,1224,1225,1226,1227,1228) - .Try with this pattern tried but it now this fine
  14. 02:58:297 (1250) - Remove finisher, I don't listen a crash cymbal ok
  15. 03:36:130 (37) - Remove finisher, same as above no
That's all from me, nice map~
Good luck!
thank you!!!
posted
Here's a little mod.


[Fight]
⏩00:14:298 (34) - may change to k. kkdkkdkkdkk sounds better I think.
⏩00:17:132 (47,48,49,50,51,52) - I just think that the current pattern is not nice enough, maybe kkddkk or kdkdkk for these six notes?
⏩00:30:132 (113,114,115) - kdk to indicate the high pitched piano.
⏩00:38:298 (158,159) - 00:46:298 (207,208) - dk, just like what I’ve said in 00:30:132 (113,114,115) - .
⏩01:16:798 (432,433,434,435,436,437,438) - I would say that you should stick to the finisher usage of the previous sections, not a different one.
⏩01:45:464 (666) - Change to k for consistent pattern that you used for every ½ gap they are k k.
⏩Starting from 03:16:464 (1432) - I think you can instead make streams so that it would not be awkward that you miss ⅙ quadruples at 03:18:964 (1452,1453) - and 03:20:297 (1462,1463) - .
⏩04:28:797 (462,463,464) - I think this should be a stream instead of three big notes.
⏩04:53:963 (657) - I think should delete this note to break the stream, so that you can emphasize piano scales at 04:53:963 (657,658,659,660) - .
⏩04:57:713 (697,698) - Should be a ⅙ quadruple again? :3
⏩05:03:380 (743,744,745,746,747,748,749) - I think ddkkkkd sounds better.


I can only find these worth pointing out. At the end, while testplaying the map it is very smooth and nice :)
Good luck with the map!!
posted

Faputa wrote:

Here's a little mod.


[Fight]
⏩00:14:298 (34) - may change to k. kkdkkdkkdkk sounds better I think. o nice
⏩00:17:132 (47,48,49,50,51,52) - I just think that the current pattern is not nice enough, maybe kkddkk or kdkdkk for these six notes? kdkdkk
⏩00:30:132 (113,114,115) - kdk to indicate the high pitched piano. yeah
⏩00:38:298 (158,159) - 00:46:298 (207,208) - dk, just like what I’ve said in 00:30:132 (113,114,115) - . kd^
⏩01:16:798 (432,433,434,435,436,437,438) - I would say that you should stick to the finisher usage of the previous sections, not a different one. ohh
⏩01:45:464 (666) - Change to k for consistent pattern that you used for every ½ gap they are k k. no D is fine now
⏩Starting from 03:16:464 (1432) - I think you can instead make streams so that it would not be awkward that you miss ⅙ quadruples at 03:18:964 (1452,1453) - and 03:20:297 (1462,1463) - . no no
⏩04:28:797 (462,463,464) - I think this should be a stream instead of three big notes. ok I love stream <3
⏩04:53:963 (657) - I think should delete this note to break the stream, so that you can emphasize piano scales at 04:53:963 (657,658,659,660) - . ok deleted
⏩04:57:713 (697,698) - Should be a ⅙ quadruple again? :3 no,I can't make more star LoL
⏩05:03:380 (743,744,745,746,747,748,749) - I think ddkkkkd sounds better. I change this pattern


I can only find these worth pointing out. At the end, while testplaying the map it is very smooth and nice :)
Good luck with the map!!
thank you
I will mod you map if have time

posted
#ทีมดองงาน
อาจกลับมา mod จริงจังหลังจากหายไปนาน
ขี้เกียจดูตรงเล็กๆน้อยๆ ขอเช็คเท่าที่เห็นได้ชัดก่อน :3

[ ความเห็นส่วนตัว]
http://www.dictionarist.com/squartatrice

Definition wrote:

squartatrice n. ripper, murderer who slashes or mutilates his victims with a knife
ชื่อเพลงมันแปลว่าฆาตกร อะไรทำนองนี้ครับ
ชื่อระดับความยาก Fight (ต่อสู้) ดูจะไม่ค่อยสอดคล้องกับชื่อเพลงซักเท่าไร
ผมเสนอชื่อ "Ripper" (ฆาตกร) ก็ดูดีไปอีกแบบนะครับ
อย่างที่บอก คหสต เฉยๆ ไม่ชอบก็ไม่ต้องเปลี่ยน :3

[Fight]
00:24:298 - 00:26:964 - 00:32:297 - 00:34:964 - ลบ ก็อาจดีเหมือนกันนะครับ ช่วงแรกเพลงยังเบาๆอยู่ ใส่โน้ตตามจังหวะหลักอาจดีกว่านะครับ
01:39:463 - ลบ , เท่าที่สังเกตุ ตรงนี้จะตาม melody หลัก ซึ่งตรงนี้ไม่มีครับ
01:50:796 - เสียงนี้ไม่จำเป็นต้องเน้นด้วย finisher ครับ . เสียงไม่ได้เด่นอะไรเป็นพิเศษ
01:59:963 จนถึง 02:01:463 - ตรงนี้ใช้โน้ต 3 มากเกินไปครับ คิดว่าถ้าทำให้มันสอดคล้องกับช่วงแรก
(ตัวเลขหมายถึงจำนวนโน้ต)
ตอนแรก - 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 3 3 3 3
แบบนี้โน้ต 3 มันติดกันไปพอตัวครับ ตอนเล่นอาจทำให้เกิดอาการหาวนอนได้
ที่แนะนำแบบตัวอย่างข้างล่าง - 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 5
ตัวอย่างการจัดเรียงที่แนะนำ
02:25:463 - เปลี่ยนเป็น D (และลบ 02:25:546) , เสียงเหมือนตรง 02:24:130 ครับ
02:26:296 - เปลี่ยนเป็น d , เสียงต่างจาก 02:25:963 (968,969,970,971) ดังนั้น เปลี่ยนสีเพื่อสร้างความแตกต่างบ้างก็ไม่เลวครับ
posted

Tyistiana wrote:

#ทีมดองงาน
อาจกลับมา mod จริงจังหลังจากหายไปนาน
ขี้เกียจดูตรงเล็กๆน้อยๆ ขอเช็คเท่าที่เห็นได้ชัดก่อน :3

[ ความเห็นส่วนตัว]
http://www.dictionarist.com/squartatrice

Definition wrote:

squartatrice n. ripper, murderer who slashes or mutilates his victims with a knife
ชื่อเพลงมันแปลว่าฆาตกร อะไรทำนองนี้ครับ
ชื่อระดับความยาก Fight (ต่อสู้) ดูจะไม่ค่อยสอดคล้องกับชื่อเพลงซักเท่าไร
ผมเสนอชื่อ "Ripper" (ฆาตกร) ก็ดูดีไปอีกแบบนะครับ
อย่างที่บอก คหสต เฉยๆ ไม่ชอบก็ไม่ต้องเปลี่ยน :3

[Fight]
00:24:298 - 00:26:964 - 00:32:297 - 00:34:964 - ลบ ก็อาจดีเหมือนกันนะครับ ช่วงแรกเพลงยังเบาๆอยู่ ใส่โน้ตตามจังหวะหลักอาจดีกว่านะครับ เปลี่ยนเยอะเลย
01:39:463 - ลบ , เท่าที่สังเกตุ ตรงนี้จะตาม melody หลัก ซึ่งตรงนี้ไม่มีครับ จะได้กะจังหวะง่ายไง
01:50:796 - เสียงนี้ไม่จำเป็นต้องเน้นด้วย finisher ครับ . เสียงไม่ได้เด่นอะไรเป็นพิเศษ อยากใส่
01:59:963 จนถึง 02:01:463 - ตรงนี้ใช้โน้ต 3 มากเกินไปครับ คิดว่าถ้าทำให้มันสอดคล้องกับช่วงแรก แบบเดิมดีแล้ว มันคือช่วงrelax
(ตัวเลขหมายถึงจำนวนโน้ต)
ตอนแรก - 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 3 3 3 3
แบบนี้โน้ต 3 มันติดกันไปพอตัวครับ ตอนเล่นอาจทำให้เกิดอาการหาวนอนได้
ที่แนะนำแบบตัวอย่างข้างล่าง - 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 5
ตัวอย่างการจัดเรียงที่แนะนำ
02:25:463 - เปลี่ยนเป็น D (และลบ 02:25:546) , เสียงเหมือนตรง 02:24:130 ครับ ไม่ครับ
02:26:296 - เปลี่ยนเป็น d , เสียงต่างจาก 02:25:963 (968,969,970,971) ดังนั้น เปลี่ยนสีเพื่อสร้างความแตกต่างบ้างก็ไม่เลวครับ ไม่ครับ
แต็งกิ้ว~~~~~~~~~
posted
My first try
Mod....

[Fight]
01:41:796 - ให้ลองเปลี่ยนเป็นโน๊ตแบบธรรมดาดู เพราะเวลาเล่นด้วย DT มันกด Bignote ลำบาก
01:39:463 - ลองเป็น d K k D k k ดู hitsound น่าจะฟังดูดีกว่า
02:26:463 - ก่อนช่วงนี้ให้ลองลบช่วงแรกออกหน่อย หรือเปลี่ยนเป็นโน๊ตทีละตัว เพราะจะได้เว้นไว้สำหรับ เริ่มมอง stream 1/6 ได้ทัน
[แนะนำสำหรับแมพนี้ มีส่วนที่เป็น 1/6 หรือ 1/4 มากเกินไป ควรตัดช่วงที่ไม่ค่อยจำเป็นบางช่วงออก แล้วลองแก้ไข 1/6 บางที่ดู เพราะค่อนข้างกดลำบากมาก ใน BPM ระดับ 180+
และใช้รูปแบบที่กดสลับ 1/6 ที่คนทั่วไปสามารถอ่านได้ใน mod HR ]
(และก็ ขอให้ลบ Bignote หรือเปลี่ยนเป็นโน๊ตธรรมดาดู เพราะดูรวมๆแล้ว Bignote ในเพลงนี้มีมากเกินไป)
posted
M4M from my queue~

[General]
There are over 100 unsnapped objects. You probably want to fix these first.

[Fight]
00:01:798 (3) - Change to d? It'd match the structure at 00:06:798 (9,10,11,12). [2 kats, 2 dons]
00:04:465 (7) - ^
00:12:465 (28) - ^
00:15:131 (39) - ^

00:16:798 - I think you should change this pattern [for consistency with 00:06:798 (9,10,11,12)]. I'd suggest:
00:16:965 (46) - Change to d.
00:17:298 (48) - Change to k.
00:17:464 (49) - Change to d.

00:22:298 (69,70) - Swap these to reflect the octave change.
00:25:464 (86) - Change to d. The piano doesn't sound the same as 00:25:297 (85).
00:32:964 (124,125,126,127) - Use kdkd for pattern variety.
00:35:131 (135) - Change to d for pattern variety.
00:40:631 (164) - Change to k? The piano is descending at the same rate as 00:39:965 (160).
00:43:131 (182) - Use k for consistency with 00:27:131 (94).\
00:48:631 (213) - Change to k. Same reason as 00:40:631.
00:54:520 (258,259,260) - Change to ddk? This is just personal preference, though.
01:00:130 (308,309,310,311,312) - dkddk? The current pattern doesn't flow too well imo.
01:06:796 (369) - Too many k-heavy pattern imo. Maybe change this note to d?
00:59:463 (302,303,304,305,306) - dkddk? Same reason as 01:00:130.
01:07:963 (380) - Change to d?
01:06:796 (369) - d? Same reason as 01:06:796.

Hope this helps. Good luck with ranking this! :)
posted
a bit late heh, m4m from queue.

  1. 00:40:964 (166) - could change to kat to keep with the k d d k d d k from 00:39:964 - . It's also easier to differ the 1/4 piano part from the 1/2 piano part due to different colours if you change that. If you agree then do the same on similar parts.
  2. On the streams here 01:26:963 - ~ 01:37:963 - try to follow the melody, using patterns that give emphasis on the synth sounds like 01:27:130 - , 01:27:630 - , 01:27:963 - , 01:28:130 - , 01:28:296 - and 01:28:463 - . Or simply the drums. It's better as the patterns right now don't follow neither the melody nor the drums, looks random tbh
  3. 03:24:005 - add new timing point with "omit first bar line" to remove the extra bar line.
  4. 03:36:130 - On this part, to be more consistent, I think you should choose to follow the drums or the piano on these notes: 03:37:130 (45) - and 03:39:797 (60) - . They have the same piano sound but on the second you follow the drums cymbal. Choose one or another here.
  5. 04:42:797 - the sv on this 1/6 pattern is pretty strange tbh. try making it smoother or not using it at all.
  6. 04:43:130 - omit first bar line on the red line here.


nice song, good luck cocoa boi
posted
ตายๆ 3 mod

RazeSGP53 wrote:

My first try ลอง:3
Mod....

[Fight]
01:41:796 - ให้ลองเปลี่ยนเป็นโน๊ตแบบธรรมดาดู เพราะเวลาเล่นด้วย DT มันกด Bignote ลำบาก ไม่อะ ถ้าอย่างงั้นคนที่DTต้องกดแบบข้างเดียวเอา
01:39:463 - ลองเป็น d K k D k k ดู hitsound น่าจะฟังดูดีกว่า เราว่าแบบเดิมก็โอแล้วนะ
02:26:463 - ก่อนช่วงนี้ให้ลองลบช่วงแรกออกหน่อย หรือเปลี่ยนเป็นโน๊ตทีละตัว เพราะจะได้เว้นไว้สำหรับ เริ่มมอง stream 1/6 ได้ทัน มันไม่ค่อยโออะ
[แนะนำสำหรับแมพนี้ มีส่วนที่เป็น 1/6 หรือ 1/4 มากเกินไป ควรตัดช่วงที่ไม่ค่อยจำเป็นบางช่วงออก แล้วลองแก้ไข 1/6 บางที่ดู เพราะค่อนข้างกดลำบากมาก ใน BPM ระดับ 180+
และใช้รูปแบบที่กดสลับ 1/6 ที่คนทั่วไปสามารถอ่านได้ใน mod HR ] นี่มันผลประโยชน์ส่วนตัวชัดๆ
(และก็ ขอให้ลบ Bignote หรือเปลี่ยนเป็นโน๊ตธรรมดาดู เพราะดูรวมๆแล้ว Bignote ในเพลงนี้มีมากเกินไป) แต่มันเข้าไง ปกติเราก็ชอบใส่อยู่แล้ว แต้งกิ๊วมาก

Protonori wrote:

M4M from my queue~

[General]
There are over 100 unsnapped objects. You probably want to fix these first. I knew

[Fight]
00:01:798 (3) - Change to d? It'd match the structure at 00:06:798 (9,10,11,12). [2 kats, 2 dons] not work for me
00:04:465 (7) - ^ ^
00:12:465 (28) - ^ ^
00:15:131 (39) - ^ ^

00:16:798 - I think you should change this pattern [for consistency with 00:06:798 (9,10,11,12)]. I'd suggest:
00:16:965 (46) - Change to d.
00:17:298 (48) - Change to k.
00:17:464 (49) - Change to d. nice idea but I change to kkdkddkk

00:22:298 (69,70) - Swap these to reflect the octave change. ahh ok
00:25:464 (86) - Change to d. The piano doesn't sound the same as 00:25:297 (85). no
00:32:964 (124,125,126,127) - Use kdkd for pattern variety. ^
00:35:131 (135) - Change to d for pattern variety. ok
00:40:631 (164) - Change to k? The piano is descending at the same rate as 00:39:965 (160). seem good
00:43:131 (182) - Use k for consistency with 00:27:131 (94).\ haha no
00:48:631 (213) - Change to k. Same reason as 00:40:631. good
00:54:520 (258,259,260) - Change to ddk? This is just personal preference, though. ok
01:00:130 (308,309,310,311,312) - dkddk? The current pattern doesn't flow too well imo. hmm no, I want to use kdkkd than
01:06:796 (369) - Too many k-heavy pattern imo. Maybe change this note to d? no
00:59:463 (302,303,304,305,306) - dkddk? Same reason as 01:00:130. no
01:07:963 (380) - Change to d? k seem good now
01:06:796 (369) - d? Same reason as 01:06:796. ^

Hope this helps. Good luck with ranking this! :)thanks!!!

Marm wrote:

a bit late heh, m4m from queue.

  1. 00:40:964 (166) - could change to kat to keep with the k d d k d d k from 00:39:964 - . It's also easier to differ the 1/4 piano part from the 1/2 piano part due to different colours if you change that. If you agree then do the same on similar parts. before I used but it's not work
  2. On the streams here 01:26:963 - ~ 01:37:963 - try to follow the melody, using patterns that give emphasis on the synth sounds like 01:27:130 - , 01:27:630 - , 01:27:963 - , 01:28:130 - , 01:28:296 - and 01:28:463 - . Or simply the drums. It's better as the patterns right now don't follow neither the melody nor the drums, looks random tbh yeah it's look random,but K it's look work now
  3. 03:24:005 - add new timing point with "omit first bar line" to remove the extra bar line. added
  4. 03:36:130 - On this part, to be more consistent, I think you should choose to follow the drums or the piano on these notes: 03:37:130 (45) - and 03:39:797 (60) - . They have the same piano sound but on the second you follow the drums cymbal. Choose one or another here. ok,change to d
  5. 04:42:797 - the sv on this 1/6 pattern is pretty strange tbh. try making it smoother or not using it at all. ok
  6. 04:43:130 - omit first bar line on the red line here. ok


nice song, good luck cocoa boi
thank you~~~~~~ :):):)
posted
Kudoshot
Go rank this Though i can't play this map
posted

Unknown_player wrote:

Kudoshot
Go rank this Though i can't play this map
Thanks
It's already.just waiting taikocracy check it
posted
super minor things

02:27:797 (991,992,993,994,995,996,997,998) - change to just regular 1/4, the 1/6 doesn't match up with anything
04:29:463 - i recommend mapping more piano notes in this section, feels kind of underwhelming when playing it for there to be random gaps where there are piano notes
05:22:547 (953,954,955,956,957,958,959) - this is also just regular 1/4
posted

Taikocracy wrote:

super minor things

02:27:797 (991,992,993,994,995,996,997,998) - change to just regular 1/4, the 1/6 doesn't match up with anything ok,I know that but I'm just ignore .changed
04:29:463 - i recommend mapping more piano notes in this section, feels kind of underwhelming when playing it for there to be random gaps where there are piano notes fixed pattern
05:22:547 (953,954,955,956,957,958,959) - this is also just regular 1/4 I know that but if I use 1/4 in 05:22:547 - 05:22:629 .so I just make it better and use the same patter > 05:21:879 and 05:22:213 and make this sound dominant > 05:22:713 you will can hear this sound. so it's fine now
thank you ;)
posted
what a dream or cream...

gg :[]
posted

Surono wrote:

what a dream or cream...

gg :[]
I need you chack too
Daddy dem <3
please.I'm your son
posted
<Surono> whats that
<Cocoaaa> chack please dem <3
<Surono> ooo ya ya
<Surono> wait
<Cocoaaa> we can do IRC for now
<Surono> :o
<Surono> i forget what is the diffname of your map
<Cocoaaa> Coconi
<Surono> in here still "Tatsujin"
<Surono> oh oke, i change it
<Cocoaaa> and update lul
<Surono> Coconi - _-
<Cocoaaa> yep
<Cocoaaa> I think it possiblexD
<Surono> yeah i hope
<Surono> what even, 6.9*
<Surono> what have you done there, pepe map?
<Cocoaaa> not all pp
<Cocoaaa> look it you will know
<Surono> so I guess
<Surono> its hard map with high sr
<Surono> - _-
<Cocoaaa> yep
<Cocoaaa> very hard to get pp
<Surono> lol nice
<Cocoaaa> not free for playerxD
<Surono> ok lets start, 00:13:631 (30,31,32,33,34,35) - yeh, i listen to this sound.. more like 1 1 2 2 1 1 flows
<Surono> so how about k k d d k k?
<Cocoaaa> change to kkddkd
<Surono> hell yeah
<Surono> where is the hell part?
<Cocoaaa> lul
<Cocoaaa> you will see it
<Surono> 1/6+1/4 ??
<Surono> 05:22:546 - the
<Cocoaaa> yeah.in later
<Cocoaaa> but it still really hard for play
<Surono> yeah
<Surono> more hard than nishizumi 1/6+1/4 maps
<Surono> - _- and some shinsekai pattern zzzzzzzzz i cri for eternity
<Cocoaaa> sure
<Cocoaaa> I don't know xD
<Surono> 02:26:963 - I cry
<Cocoaaa> why
<Surono> bcus my hand is baby XDDDddddd
<Surono> 02:39:130 - mmmmhhhhh hell yeah yummy
<Surono> 02:56:463 - im sure from here, the sound is not 1/4 but its 1/6
<Cocoaaa> now kkkkkkd 1/6 it's easy for me
<Surono> yeah ez for kddk player
<Cocoaaa> yeah I know but keep because it over and look strange in this pattern
<Surono> hmm i see
<Cocoaaa> so long kkkk it seem fine
<Surono> I know its hard to make 1/6+1/4 if the sound just flat like that lol
<Surono> where you get the timing?
<Cocoaaa> from std map
<Surono> ohh nice
<Cocoaaa> I think
<Cocoaaa> I need you look this point 03:37:464
<Cocoaaa> yeah dem right
<Surono> ,. seems good
<Surono> you follow the base sound of 1/2
<Surono> not the snap of piano :o
<Cocoaaa> really? xD
<Surono> ye
<Surono> -_ - oh come on I started nub doesnt mean I cant take a look to hard stuff zzzz
<Surono> but idk, yeh i forget how to play taiko or idk
<Surono> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz i miss when I can play as ddkk player hueeeeeeeeeeeeeeee /cri
<Cocoaaa> _ _'
<Cocoaaa> overall ok now?
<Surono> ya
<Surono> now I will check the setting of this map if there has error
<Cocoaaa> ok
<Surono> 03:20:463 - yeah please test this part zzzz
<Cocoaaa> oh
<Surono> 03:20:463 - add new redlines and enable omit first barlines
<Cocoaaa> last note and big?
<Surono> yeah, unrankable..
<Cocoaaa> wait
<Surono> 03:20:798 - add sv 1.35
<Cocoaaa> 03:20:796 - I think it's need speed up
<Surono> yeah there is
<Surono> 03:20:798 -
<Surono> 03:24:005 - enable omit first barlines
<Surono> ok done, tell me if you updated it
<Cocoaaa> 03:00:463 start kiai
<Cocoaaa> but end when?
<Cocoaaa> nono
<Cocoaaa> cause add timing point
<Cocoaaa> wait amin
<Cocoaaa> already now
<Cocoaaa> updated
<Surono> wow pro setting value of svs
<Cocoaaa> 01:45:463 ?
<Cocoaaa> - _ -
<Cocoaaa> for SVs I'm just guessing
<Cocoaaa> yeah,it's fine
show more
Please sign in to reply.