yo, it's not exactly BN check since I'm feeling sleepy rn, but I'll point out a couple of things
First of all, hitsounds are way too low imo, they're barely hearable in the main parts of the song if at all, it sounds like you've just copied the same samples from djmax with similar volume so it just stacks on top of existing sounds and you get no actual feedback from tapping the keys.
With how this is charted it's actually pretty hard to get good accuracy on this.
Also there really should be more finishes in hitsounds for crashes or whatever like for example 00:02:988 - or 00:10:548 - , you know, where you'd put a scratch on 7+1k
looking at the mod responses in the thread one thing caught my eyes.
shionelove wrote:
yo bc im hungry
i dont think there is any reason behind them either. if its for piano pls no bc the piano isnt the main thing being charted and its barely hear-able, more of a background noise. and if you've added notes because there is an extra piano pls no as well because it gives false emphasis on notes where there shouldnt be
you need 1000000000000000000000000 yen headphone.or it's common in IIDX where i learned from a lot and i love
I really don't like that argument. Yeah sure in IIDX it might be common, but the thing is, this is not IIDX. You're not
making a song for the game and then charting it. You're not
keysounding a chart without MP3 in the background. It's really not a good argument that you need studio headphones to hear a note in a rhythm game. It's diffrent in fully 100% keysounded charts because you will hear the sample or you won't hear it if you don't play the note. Or you will hear it delayed or anything. It's not the same if you're just layering stuff on top of the mp3, sometimes you just can't make out what's what and that's not good. That's just how I feel about that argument.
Also about the diffnames:
I know that yoshilove's diff is technically harder than yours, and it's in a diffrent style, which is okay, but I do think that you two should either put the same diffname (yoshilove's Another and Another), or just reverse diffnames, because as broken as star rating is, it's weird to have the lower SR diff having a custom name.
I'm not 100% sure if it would be okay to keep it like that honestly, so that's why I have to voice my concerns
Anyway, I'll look for some pattern suggestions
[Another]
if you're going with OD 9, you might as well put HP 9 on it. Yoshi's diff has HP9 despite being way harder to pass and this is just rice so it won't feel as bad as it might be
00:38:303 - You're not layering the synth here and at 00:40:193 - while you do layer it at 00:42:083 (42083|6,42201|4,42319|5,42437|3,42555|2) - , this occasion IS more significant but I think for consistency sake you should layer the two before as well
01:24:485 - Suggesting this, since the 5[46]5 in your pattern is awkward to play (I think it was my only miss on DT lol) and to ease it out reading wise a bit
overall not much to say, it's a pretty tricky accuracy chart, but I would honestly agree with error's point a bit
[yoshilove]
00:12:201 (12201|4,12201|5,12319|5,12319|4) - 00:14:091 (14091|0,14091|2,14209|2,14209|0) - and all similar double minijacks - I get what you're going for, but it really doesn't fit to have double minijacks for small hithats, single minijack on the lane closer to the middle would be well enough
00:26:138 - Suggesting this pattern because for right thumb players the LN in the middle is very troublesome and awkward before the already hard to hit pattern here 00:26:611 (26611|6,26729|4,26965|6,27083|4,27319|6,27437|4,27674|6,27792|4) -
00:59:681 - damn I really like that pattern, the anchor for beat and scatter stream for voice samples feels good
01:26:492 (86492|3,86611|2,86611|4) - What's the reasoning for doing this pattern exactly the way it is? The notes being in the middle of a very short LN make it really REALLY awkward to hit and I have to manipulate my fingers in a weird way to even hold decent accuracy through it.
I need you to be sure if this is intentional because it's one of the 2-3 most uncomfortable patterns in this chart and you repeat it 7 times in this section
Overall interesting set, but might use a bit more polishing. Let me know when you reply to the mods and we'll see what happens