forum

Linkin Park - Heavy (feat. Kiiara)

posted
Total Posts
61
Topic Starter
Andrea
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on domenica 6 agosto 2017 at 04:58:03

Artist: Linkin Park
Title: Heavy (feat. Kiiara)
Tags: Chester Bennington Rob Bourdon Brad Delson Dave Farrel Joe Hahn Mike Shinoda Tribute osuplayer111 One More Light
BPM: 150
Filesize: 16713kb
Play Time: 02:42
Difficulties Available:
  1. Heavy (3,44 stars, 418 notes)
  2. Light (1,27 stars, 117 notes)
  3. Medium (1,85 stars, 199 notes)
Download: Linkin Park - Heavy (feat. Kiiara)
Download: Linkin Park - Heavy (feat. Kiiara) (no video)
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
My 219th Beatmap.

This is my tribute to Chester Bennington.

I still remember like it was yesterday, during 2006, I got internet for the first time and I started downloading songs like crazy. My best friend in real life told me to download a song called Numb, I remember that after I listened to it, my life changed. I got really interested into Linkin Park and I never stopped being a fan since then. Chester's voice is something unique and I think nobody could ever replace him. I still fill a big hole in my heart and even dedicating this doesn't make me stop thinking about him. He was a big inspiration for me and he will be forever. Thank you for the awesome songs you gave me, thanks to you I got the strenght to keep going in my life. Sincerely, one of the many Linkin Park's Soldiers.


Mapset:

Heavy - Done.
Medium - Done.
Light - Done.
Natsu
Andreita
ZekeyHache
👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀

[General]
  1. Metadata source?
  2. Your preview point is unsnapped. It's rankable to have it unsnapped, but just letting you know in case you wanna have it snapped.
  3. I can hear the BPM goes at 75 (half of the current BPM); however, I've checked online just for curiosity and I got results of 150 BPM O.o I suggest to ask a couple of BNs if they're okay with this BPM just to be safe later.
  4. for some unknown reason, some people have trouble with mp4 video files; however their issues disappear when you change the ".mp4" extension to ".avi". The game will still read it and most people won't have issues with it lol. Anyway, besides that stuff, you should make the video 1280x720 and add black bars to the emptiness since most people use 16:9 or 4:3. This causes the current resolution to be cut by the game to fit the whole screen and we don't get too see everything (unless u have an extra wide resolution). Awesome compression btw.
[Light]
  1. 01:40:220 (2) - Looks weird since is not the usual shape you do. Here you moved up the points surrounding the red one.
  2. 01:52:220 (1,2) - This is the only place where you make an overlap in this diff. I highly suggest to get rid of it for a cleaner/consistent structure.
  3. 01:58:620 (1) - The shape would be neater if you move the white point below the red one by one grid to the left.
  4. 02:01:820 - This beat would be better off as a clickable object due to the highlight in the vocals = better emphasis. I know you would have to sacrifice the symmetry.
  5. 02:24:220 - Same here. Also, in this case, this is the only non-clickable beat of this kind. They were clickable at 01:20:220 - 01:26:620 - and 01:39:420 - . You can compensate the loss of your symmetric pattern by making another one with 02:18:620 (2,3,1) - so don't worry much about having less symmetry in your map.
[Medium]
  1. 00:47:420 - This beat may not be a downbeat, but the strength it has in the music makes it quite important, so I highly suggest to make it a clickable object for a better emphasis.
  2. 01:01:820 (2,3) - They don't look perfectly aligned.
  3. 01:41:420 (2,1) - Perfect 1/1 overlaps are against the rules at this level, as you can see here. STD RC. So you gotta increase stack leniency.
[Heavy]
  1. 01:34:820 (7,8) - 01:55:220 (1,2) - 02:19:620 (7,8) - These blankets can be improved.
  2. 02:03:420 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - Maybe try using an arch instead of a straight line for the stream to make it more interesting.
  3. 02:32:220 (5,6) - Not perfectly parallel.
Feel free to call me back when you get 4 mods and 12 SP ;)
Shiratori
Why the osz without video is so large?
please hold
my map:https://osu.ppy.sh/s/634463


[Light]
video please use flv dont use mp4
because that cant let download without cideo rightly

looks good
[medium]
00:09:820 (3) - i dont think the slider is nice. thy not blanket
00:18:020 (4) - delete it and make a 1/1 slider here
00:19:020 (1) - 2 1/2 silders like this
00:29:020 (1,2) - change to slider like this
img
https://puu.sh/wU0S9/1bdc42f79d.png
or let here break
01:22:620 (1) - dont nc here 01:23:820 (2) - nc here
the silder end is a downbeat. should be chickable
01:26:620 (1) - ^
01:29:020 (1) - ^
02:05:020 (1,2) - i think 1 is a long note
change them to slider
and you can trun down the sv
[heavy]
02:03:420 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) -
hard shouldnt have long stream
unless you can let the star up to 3.75
00:06:420 (4,5,1) - suddenly stream, not comfortable
00:12:820 (5,6,1) - ^
00:21:820 (3,4,5,6,1) - its not Pentagon, use ctrl shift d to make a Pentagon

thats all
shoot a star
Stefan
:cry:
Aurele
oh hi
pw384
star!
gonna give a mod later after I finish the exam today

edit:

ok. Chester we miss you.

[Heavy]
  1. 01:43:020 (2) - Reverse the slider, and will be more enjoyable. Trust me
  2. 02:05:020 (1) - 02:11:420 (3) - What about making them into sliders to interpret vocal better?
  3. 02:27:820 (2) - You know what i'm goint to say

[Medium]
  1. 01:36:220 (1,2) - You might want to blanket them
  2. 02:11:420 (3) - Why not make it in the way of 00:35:420 (3) - ?
  3. 02:22:220 (1) - Remove new combo since the frequency of new combo is a bit high here?

[Light]
  1. 00:42:620 (2,1) - seems weird from my perspective

solid and clear mapset, nothing to be picky on. Good luck with this set!
Topic Starter
Andrea
ezek

ezek wrote:

👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀

[General]
  1. Metadata source? Best Source I could find is the official video from Linkin Park's Channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dmQ3QWpy1Q
  2. Your preview point is unsnapped. It's rankable to have it unsnapped, but just letting you know in case you wanna have it snapped. Gonna resnap it on every difficulty.
  3. I can hear the BPM goes at 75 (half of the current BPM); however, I've checked online just for curiosity and I got results of 150 BPM O.o I suggest to ask a couple of BNs if they're okay with this BPM just to be safe later. I looked for the BPM everywhere as well and it seems to be 150, so I'll just keep it.
  4. for some unknown reason, some people have trouble with mp4 video files; however their issues disappear when you change the ".mp4" extension to ".avi". The game will still read it and most people won't have issues with it lol. Anyway, besides that stuff, you should make the video 1280x720 and add black bars to the emptiness since most people use 16:9 or 4:3. This causes the current resolution to be cut by the game to fit the whole screen and we don't get too see everything (unless u have an extra wide resolution). Awesome compression btw. Thanks! I encoded once again the video, added black bars and fixed the resolution.
[Light]
  1. 01:40:220 (2) - Looks weird since is not the usual shape you do. Here you moved up the points surrounding the red one. Yeah, I wanted to try something different, gonna keep it if possible!
  2. 01:52:220 (1,2) - This is the only place where you make an overlap in this diff. I highly suggest to get rid of it for a cleaner/consistent structure. Made a different slider.
  3. 01:58:620 (1) - The shape would be neater if you move the white point below the red one by one grid to the left. Fixed.
  4. 02:01:820 - This beat would be better off as a clickable object due to the highlight in the vocals = better emphasis. I know you would have to sacrifice the symmetry. I understand your point, but I'd prefer to keep this here if possible, will try to see if more people think it's needed to be changed.
  5. 02:24:220 - Same here. Also, in this case, this is the only non-clickable beat of this kind. They were clickable at 01:20:220 - 01:26:620 - and 01:39:420 - . You can compensate the loss of your symmetric pattern by making another one with 02:18:620 (2,3,1) - so don't worry much about having less symmetry in your map. Fixed this one.
[Medium]
  1. 00:47:420 - This beat may not be a downbeat, but the strength it has in the music makes it quite important, so I highly suggest to make it a clickable object for a better emphasis. I don't think it's really needed here, like I stated above, if more people will mention this then I will change it.
  2. 01:01:820 (2,3) - They don't look perfectly aligned. Nice catch, fixed.
  3. 01:41:420 (2,1) - Perfect 1/1 overlaps are against the rules at this level, as you can see here. STD RC. So you gotta increase stack leniency. Increased Stack Leniency by 2 ticks.
[Heavy]
  1. 01:34:820 (7,8) - 01:55:220 (1,2) - 02:19:620 (7,8) - These blankets can be improved. Tried making them better, hope they're good now.
  2. 02:03:420 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - Maybe try using an arch instead of a straight line for the stream to make it more interesting. Good idea, fixed.
  3. 02:32:220 (5,6) - Not perfectly parallel. Fixed.
Feel free to call me back when you get 4 mods and 12 SP ;) Thanks a lot for the mod! <3

Amamiya Kanade

Amamiya Kanade wrote:

Why the osz without video is so large? There is video actually.
please hold
my map:https://osu.ppy.sh/s/634463


[Light]
video please use flv dont use mp4 Changed.
because that cant let download without cideo rightly

looks good
[medium]
00:09:820 (3) - i dont think the slider is nice. thy not blanket I didn't want to make a blanket here.
00:18:020 (4) - delete it and make a 1/1 slider here I made this entire pattern 00:16:220 (1,2,3,4,5) - as circles on purpose, adding a slider here would ruin the pattern.
00:19:020 (1) - 2 1/2 silders like this I didn't add any single slider like that in the entire difficulty, adding it only here would be too random and also create a difficulty spike which isn't needed.
00:29:020 (1,2) - change to slider like this
SPOILER
https://puu.sh/wU0S9/1bdc42f79d.png
or let here break Made a different slider but the suggestion was good, so changed.
01:22:620 (1) - dont nc here 01:23:820 (2) - nc here I followed the lyric change, that's why NC is there.
the silder end is a downbeat. should be chickable
01:26:620 (1) - ^ The downbeat is clickable here already, I don't understand what you mean.
01:29:020 (1) - ^ Same as above.
02:05:020 (1,2) - i think 1 is a long note Changed to slider.
change them to slider
and you can trun down the sv
[heavy]
02:03:420 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - It's fine, only stream in this difficulty and it's actually pretty short, low BPM as well.
hard shouldnt have long stream
unless you can let the star up to 3.75
00:06:420 (4,5,1) - suddenly stream, not comfortable If you listen closely to the music in background, you can clearly hear a triplet here, that's why they're there.
00:12:820 (5,6,1) - ^ Same as above.
00:21:820 (3,4,5,6,1) - its not Pentagon, use ctrl shift d to make a Pentagon I didn't really want a pentagon here, but I appreciate the tip anyway.

thats all
shoot a star Thanks a lot for the star and for the mod!

pw384

pw384 wrote:

star!
gonna give a mod later after I finish the exam today

edit:

ok. Chester we miss you. I agree with this :(

[Heavy]
  1. 01:43:020 (2) - Reverse the slider, and will be more enjoyable. Trust me Agreed and fixed.
  2. 02:05:020 (1) - 02:11:420 (3) - What about making them into sliders to interpret vocal better? Good suggestion, fixed.
  3. 02:27:820 (2) - You know what i'm goint to say Fixed this one as well.

[Medium]
  1. 01:36:220 (1,2) - You might want to blanket them Fixed.
  2. 02:11:420 (3) - Why not make it in the way of 00:35:420 (3) - ? Fixed.
  3. 02:22:220 (1) - Remove new combo since the frequency of new combo is a bit high here? Removed the NC.

[Light]
  1. 00:42:620 (2,1) - seems weird from my perspective Should be better now.

solid and clear mapset, nothing to be picky on. Good luck with this set! Thanks a lot for the mod and for the star!

Thanks a lot for your mods, guys.

Gonna update the map now!

You will need to redownload because I added a new video.
Seto Kousuke
hi hi :P came from your queue

the mod
  1. Just to be clear about something, yeah I understand the oldstyle feel to this map and ofc I'll respect that and only try to improve your ideas, never trying to impose ''nowadays'' stuff, so try to understand my points about consistency and emphasis on the Heavy diff ^^'
[Heavy]
  1. As a 3* difficulty with an oldschool style, I have quite a few concerns about consistency and emphasiz that imo really should be improved before ranking (that we all know that will happen anyway you fixing this or not)...I won't talk about rythms structure because to the choice you had it's working nice, so let's go:
  2. 00:02:620 (1,2,3,4,1) - 5 single notes right at the start with these movements and little rythm feedback (basically only on vocals which is ''kinda'' not that consistent since it's a person speaking) seems unecessarily stressfull, i know the player can just retry in case of 100s, but it still is a stressfull start, I'd suggest you use 2 1/2 sliders for a friendlier start
  3. 00:03:420 (1,2,3) - Since your map has a lot of focus in consistency on rythms and DS, maybe you could adjust the DS from these moments? 00:06:620 (1,2,3) - 00:09:820 (1,2,3) - 00:13:020 (1,2,3) - (the last one is kinda ok to have bigger DS since it's the last one and will have a transition) they all are the same kind of sound with the same intensity, yet...they have very different DS, even on the ones you had literally the same pattern for example 00:02:620 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - with 00:09:020 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) -
  4. 00:14:820 (1,2) - the 1 has as strong sound and 00:15:020 (2) - an important beat since it's the 1 that gives the 1/1 gap to 00:15:420 (3) - . Stacking these 2 isn't really a good idea based on emphasiz, I suggest you unstack them in any way you seem cool :P
  5. 00:20:220 (6,1,2) - similar thing as the previous one, but in this case the lack of emphasiz is even higher because you stacked it on the tail of a 1/1 slider 00:20:220 (6) - , I highly suggest you emphasize this more, even if you don't want to unstack 00:21:220 (1,2) - to keep consistent with other moments like 00:24:220 (4,5,6,7) - , you need to increase the DS from the slider to the 1,2
  6. 00:49:020 (5) - this 5 needs emphasiz,same applies for 00:50:620 (8) - . Every other moment of this song (specially on this heavily emotional part) you gave emphasiz to them, even if just a little, examples :00:42:620 (5) - , 00:44:220 (8) - 00:45:820 (5) - 00:47:420 (1) - . This stacked notes fits better with moments like 00:53:020 (5,6) - which are indeed weaker :P
  7. 01:03:220 (8,9) - same as other mentions, I'll stop pointing out these same issues to not keep repeating stuff you already denied/agreed :P in case you make some changes (which I highly suggest) search in the map other ocurrencies.
  8. 01:12:020 (8,9) - Reading inconsistency issue, you had the player constantly doing the same stuff over and over again with varieties of movements, but here you trick the player by using the ''same'' pattern movement as 01:09:020 (7,8,9) - and others during entire map, that tiny increase of DS isn't enough to show the change on rythm because the whole map has some slight differences os similar DS, so this is actually an issue :P
  9. 01:23:420 (1,2,3) - 3 is obviously stronger than 1 and 2, yet you had half of the DS, Ctrl + G would make it more emphasized but would screw all the DS logics lmao, anyway you need to increase it's DS or adjust the other note's DS
  10. 01:29:820 (3,4,5) - same as before, yeah, i can see you had a pattern in both moments and yeah we all know it looks kinda cool, but the emphasiz is really weaker and stronger in opposite places. Specially because in this one you had a 180° motion with 01:29:420 (1,2,3) - which puts tension on the player's aim and increases the momentum of 01:29:820 (3,4) - so you really need a higher DS for 01:30:620 (5) - . this will also fix a lot of the DS inconsistencies, because moments like 01:05:220 (5,6) - are emphasized but this important one on Kiai is not
  11. 01:35:020 (8) - Ctrl + G ? this 100% linear with really small DS for this 8 (which is the most important click atm) really damages playability and feeling of the map, using Ctrl + G will at least emphasize it with angles which solves most of the issue and even make a nice transition to 01:35:820 (1) -
  12. 01:39:820 (3,4,5) - This stack feels out of place compared to entire structure logic you had so far, I suggest at least doing similar to stuff like 01:21:820 (4,5,6) -
  13. 01:43:020 (2,3) - This one have an eeeeven smaller DS than the other previous where already had emphasiz issues (like 01:23:820 (2,3,2,3) - ). So you know already what I want to say hehe
  14. 02:11:020 (2,3) - c'mon, you know you can do a better blanket xD
  15. 02:19:620 (7,8) - same ctrl G reason as before
  16. I realized you just copy pasted the first kiai to some point so yeah, all the mentions are the same
  17. 02:32:620 (6,7) - emphasiz yo
[Medium]
  1. both mentions here will impact the notes coming after, might give you some trouble, but try to put some thought on them :P
  2. 00:46:620 (3,4,1) - This angle and structure feels off compared to the rest of the map, maybe something like this?
  3. 01:33:020 (1,2,3,1) - Comparing all the motions and structures you had here, this 1 feels ''urgh'' because of his curve, I suggest maybe something like this? using his shape to your favor on the flow, and now as an enemy
[Light]
  1. nothing relevant to say about

nice having a map with this style again nowadays, nostalgia xD

:)
Topic Starter
Andrea
Seto Kousuke

Seto Kousuke wrote:

hi hi :P came from your queue

  1. Just to be clear about something, yeah I understand the oldstyle feel to this map and ofc I'll respect that and only try to improve your ideas, never trying to impose ''nowadays'' stuff, so try to understand my points about consistency and emphasis on the Heavy diff ^^' Let's see how this goes, my mapping mentality is not so modern I can agree with that, but it doesn't mean that's it's bad!
[Heavy]
  1. As a 3* difficulty with an oldschool style, I have quite a few concerns about consistency and emphasiz that imo really should be improved before ranking (that we all know that will happen anyway you fixing this or not)...I won't talk about rythms structure because to the choice you had it's working nice, so let's go:
  2. 00:02:620 (1,2,3,4,1) - 5 single notes right at the start with these movements and little rythm feedback (basically only on vocals which is ''kinda'' not that consistent since it's a person speaking) seems unecessarily stressfull, i know the player can just retry in case of 100s, but it still is a stressfull start, I'd suggest you use 2 1/2 sliders for a friendlier start I understand your point and it's valid, though I have to refuse it because the next 4 patterns that has the same music style are all using only circles, so if I do what you said it would break my consistency.
  3. 00:03:420 (1,2,3) - Since your map has a lot of focus in consistency on rythms and DS, maybe you could adjust the DS from these moments? 00:06:620 (1,2,3) - 00:09:820 (1,2,3) - 00:13:020 (1,2,3) - (the last one is kinda ok to have bigger DS since it's the last one and will have a transition) they all are the same kind of sound with the same intensity, yet...they have very different DS, even on the ones you had literally the same pattern for example 00:02:620 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - with 00:09:020 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - Fair enough, I fixed the spacing on these patterns.
  4. 00:14:820 (1,2) - the 1 has as strong sound and 00:15:020 (2) - an important beat since it's the 1 that gives the 1/1 gap to 00:15:420 (3) - . Stacking these 2 isn't really a good idea based on emphasiz, I suggest you unstack them in any way you seem cool :P I stacked many other patterns with similiar rhythm, they should be fine.
  5. 00:20:220 (6,1,2) - similar thing as the previous one, but in this case the lack of emphasiz is even higher because you stacked it on the tail of a 1/1 slider 00:20:220 (6) - , I highly suggest you emphasize this more, even if you don't want to unstack 00:21:220 (1,2) - to keep consistent with other moments like 00:24:220 (4,5,6,7) - , you need to increase the DS from the slider to the 1,2 Same answer as above.
  6. 00:49:020 (5) - this 5 needs emphasiz,same applies for 00:50:620 (8) - . Every other moment of this song (specially on this heavily emotional part) you gave emphasiz to them, even if just a little, examples :00:42:620 (5) - , 00:44:220 (8) - 00:45:820 (5) - 00:47:420 (1) - . This stacked notes fits better with moments like 00:53:020 (5,6) - which are indeed weaker :P Even if they're stacked, the hitsounds are providing the emphasis needed. Also, there's no need to space them much because it's a slow part.
  7. 01:03:220 (8,9) - same as other mentions, I'll stop pointing out these same issues to not keep repeating stuff you already denied/agreed :P in case you make some changes (which I highly suggest) search in the map other ocurrencies. I have used this stacking style on the whole difficulty on purpose, therefore I'm not gonna change it, I appreciate your comments about it though.
  8. 01:12:020 (8,9) - Reading inconsistency issue, you had the player constantly doing the same stuff over and over again with varieties of movements, but here you trick the player by using the ''same'' pattern movement as 01:09:020 (7,8,9) - and others during entire map, that tiny increase of DS isn't enough to show the change on rythm because the whole map has some slight differences os similar DS, so this is actually an issue :P Changed the pattern, should be better to read now.
  9. 01:23:420 (1,2,3) - 3 is obviously stronger than 1 and 2, yet you had half of the DS, Ctrl + G would make it more emphasized but would screw all the DS logics lmao, anyway you need to increase it's DS or adjust the other note's DS I got your point, even though I think current spacing is already fine enough.
  10. 01:29:820 (3,4,5) - same as before, yeah, i can see you had a pattern in both moments and yeah we all know it looks kinda cool, but the emphasiz is really weaker and stronger in opposite places. Specially because in this one you had a 180° motion with 01:29:420 (1,2,3) - which puts tension on the player's aim and increases the momentum of 01:29:820 (3,4) - so you really need a higher DS for 01:30:620 (5) - . this will also fix a lot of the DS inconsistencies, because moments like 01:05:220 (5,6) - are emphasized but this important one on Kiai is not Same answer as above.
  11. 01:35:020 (8) - Ctrl + G ? this 100% linear with really small DS for this 8 (which is the most important click atm) really damages playability and feeling of the map, using Ctrl + G will at least emphasize it with angles which solves most of the issue and even make a nice transition to 01:35:820 (1) - Yeah, I like this, changed.
  12. 01:39:820 (3,4,5) - This stack feels out of place compared to entire structure logic you had so far, I suggest at least doing similar to stuff like 01:21:820 (4,5,6) - Also agreed with this, changed.
  13. 01:43:020 (2,3) - This one have an eeeeven smaller DS than the other previous where already had emphasiz issues (like 01:23:820 (2,3,2,3) - ). So you know already what I want to say hehe There's a really small DS difference compared to previous ones, so I think it's fine.
  14. 02:11:020 (2,3) - c'mon, you know you can do a better blanket xD I actually love that slider D:
  15. 02:19:620 (7,8) - same ctrl G reason as before Yep, I fixed it before even reaching this part of the mod, lol.
  16. I realized you just copy pasted the first kiai to some point so yeah, all the mentions are the same
  17. 02:32:620 (6,7) - emphasiz yo Everything's good to me.
[Medium]
  1. both mentions here will impact the notes coming after, might give you some trouble, but try to put some thought on them :P
  2. 00:46:620 (3,4,1) - This angle and structure feels off compared to the rest of the map, maybe something like this? I wanted to do that at the beginning, but then I realized that the flow is still fine either way.
  3. 01:33:020 (1,2,3,1) - Comparing all the motions and structures you had here, this 1 feels ''urgh'' because of his curve, I suggest maybe something like this? using his shape to your favor on the flow, and now as an enemy I made that slider like that so it can make a blanket with the next pattern.
[Light]
  1. nothing relevant to say about

nice having a map with this style again nowadays, nostalgia xD Good old maps never dies! Glad you appreciate it ^^

:)

Thanks for the mod, updated.
Seto Kousuke

Andrea wrote:

but it doesn't mean that's it's bad!
yahh, I really didn't meant it xD I'm actually a fan of playing this kind of maps, they have their uniqueness :) really waiting for the ranking of this mapset <3
Topic Starter
Andrea
Glad you like it, thanks for your support! <3
josh1024
From the queue:

Rhythm seems nice so I'm gonna pick on aesthetics cuz it's just what I do best lol.

Light

00:09:020 (1,2) maybe switch (flip L/R) directions starting here for variety.
01:01:820 (2) maybe line up red point with 1st slidertick.
01:20:220 (1,2) maybe blanket this.
01:23:420 (1) line up red point with slidertick.
01:27:420 (2) here's an idea for you https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8698925
02:25:020 (2) maybe land 2nd red point on 3rd slidertick to match drum.

Medium

00:16:820 (2,4) these aren't perfectly centered.
00:39:420 (3) maybe rotate cw a bit to point at circle 2.
01:05:020 (3) ^ since this follows a triangle, which consists of straight lines, I suggest making the bottom of the curve look flatter by rotating it.
01:09:020 (4,5,6) maybe make these a perfect trigangle since they're followed up by 01:12:220 (2,3,4) a straight line.

Heavy

00:02:620 (1,2,3,4) here circle 1 3 is on white ticks.
00:09:020 (1,2,3,4) ^
00:12:020 (1,2,3,4) here circle 2 4 is on white ticks, maybe make them consistent.
Kyouren
Thank you for mapping this song <3

Other source of metadata if someone still not sure with youtube



Artist: Linkin Park
Title: Heavy Feat. Kiiara

Ignore all capital since youtube source don't used all capital

Good luck! :3
Kotori-Chan
trying my best to help a little !!!

Light
01:20:220 (1,2) - how about making these more like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8702262 just so it looks a bit more beautiful ~
dont forget to adjust 01:23:420 (1) - if you do so !!

02:40:220 (1,2,3,4) - i know they are placed like that for the sake of symmetry <33 but they are pretty pretty pretty close to the border of the playfield
but since i couldnt find a way to fix it.......just ignore what i said ~
maybe if you move 02:37:820 (2) - a bit it could work D: but letting that up to you, its not really a big issue
just mentioning it !

Medium
00:29:020 (1) - slightly going over the playfield in 4:3 https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8702340 ;w; even tho i dont really think its a that big issue, you maybe better fix this, just to be safe ~

01:09:820 (6) - not making this one centered ? i mean you basically made all the other stuff centered so yeah ~

Tried my best to help...but since your maps are imo almost perfect anyway, there isnt much else to say ;w;
Good luck with this and take my star <3
Topic Starter
Andrea
josh1024

josh1024 wrote:

From the queue:

Rhythm seems nice so I'm gonna pick on aesthetics cuz it's just what I do best lol.

Light

00:09:020 (1,2) maybe switch (flip L/R) directions starting here for variety. Flow would get weird if I do that, so I prefer to keep it.
01:01:820 (2) maybe line up red point with 1st slidertick. Changed the shape a bit.
01:20:220 (1,2) maybe blanket this. It wasn't my intention to make a blanket here.
01:23:420 (1) line up red point with slidertick. Fixed.
01:27:420 (2) here's an idea for you https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8698925 Good pattern but I also like mine ><.
02:25:020 (2) maybe land 2nd red point on 3rd slidertick to match drum. Fixed.

Medium

00:16:820 (2,4) these aren't perfectly centered. I followed distance snap, had no intention to center them.
00:39:420 (3) maybe rotate cw a bit to point at circle 2. Should be fine, I think.
01:05:020 (3) ^ since this follows a triangle, which consists of straight lines, I suggest making the bottom of the curve look flatter by rotating it. Fixed the shape a bit.
01:09:020 (4,5,6) maybe make these a perfect trigangle since they're followed up by 01:12:220 (2,3,4) a straight line. They seem fine to me.

Heavy

00:02:620 (1,2,3,4) here circle 1 3 is on white ticks.
00:09:020 (1,2,3,4) ^
00:12:020 (1,2,3,4) here circle 2 4 is on white ticks, maybe make them consistent. I understand your point but on each beginning I'm simply following the music, so that's kinda impossible to make.

Kotori-Chan

Kotori-Chan wrote:

trying my best to help a little !!! Any help is appreciated!

[Light]
01:20:220 (1,2) - how about making these more like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8702262 just so it looks a bit more beautiful ~ Nice one, fixed it.
dont forget to adjust 01:23:420 (1) - if you do so !!

02:40:220 (1,2,3,4) - i know they are placed like that for the sake of symmetry <33 but they are pretty pretty pretty close to the border of the playfield
but since i couldnt find a way to fix it.......just ignore what i said ~ They look fine in-game so I guess it's okay!
maybe if you move 02:37:820 (2) - a bit it could work D: but letting that up to you, its not really a big issue
just mentioning it !

[Medium]
00:29:020 (1) - slightly going over the playfield in 4:3 https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8702340 ;w; even tho i dont really think its a that big issue, you maybe better fix this, just to be safe ~ Indeed it's way too over, I changed the slider shape completely.

01:09:820 (6) - not making this one centered ? i mean you basically made all the other stuff centered so yeah ~ I wanted to not be too repetitive, some changes never hurt, I guess.

Tried my best to help...but since your maps are imo almost perfect anyway, there isnt much else to say ;w;
Good luck with this and take my star <3 Thanks a lot, I really appreciate it. <3

Thanks a lot for the mods, guys!

@KittyAdventure: Wow, that's pretty helpful, thank you! I fixed the Artist/Title :3

Updated.
Adol Christin
this symmetry map reminds me of the time i played your sis puella magica map. my osu! career actually started with the id "osuplayer111". finally i get a chance to mod your map.

General

  1. Timing: According to Ranking Criteria, placing objects before the first red line is not allowed. Move it to 00:01:820 - (offset=1820)

Heavy

  1. 00:28:020 (3,4) - you can build a triplet here? this can be a better transition between different song sections, and actually follows the instrument, not overmapping.
  2. 00:49:420 (6,7,8) - suggest swap the coordinate of 6 and 7,8. square makes circle 4-9 look like one part, but actually there's 2.5 beats off between 6 and 7,8. i think separating them in flow can express the song better.
  3. 00:59:820 - add a circle on (324,184) to make the drum beat clickable.
  4. 01:04:620 (4) - shorten this slider to a 1/2 one and add a circle on the next sliderhead, to make the drum beat not get covered by sliderslide. appriximately like the screenshot below:
  5. 01:24:220 (3,4) - i think ignoring 01:24:420 - and 01:25:420 - two drum beats is not a good idea for a top diff. i tried to rearrange the pattern here:
  6. 01:36:820 - same as above. add a circle on (200,220)
  7. some similar drum beats that i think should not be ignored: 01:27:620 - 01:30:820 - 01:34:220 - 01:37:220 - 02:19:020 - 02:21:620 - 02:25:220 - 02:31:620 - 02:38:020 - 02:41:220 - at least you can cover them by sliderhead, reverse point or slidertail, not by sliderslide.

Medium

  1. 01:09:020 (4,5,6) - move these three circles leftward, to make the last one exactly on (256, )
  2. 01:11:820 - add a circle on (180,320)

Light

  1. 00:15:420 (3) - suggest remove this circle, to avoid misread of rhythm here.
  2. 00:53:820 (3) - 00:55:420 (2) - move them downward to make them exactly on ( ,192)

r.i.p. Chester
Topic Starter
Andrea
Adol Christin

Adol Christin wrote:

this symmetry map reminds me of the time i played your sis puella magica map. my osu! career actually started with the id "osuplayer111". finally i get a chance to mod your map. Good times, huh? Glad I was your first mapper!

General

  1. Timing: According to Ranking Criteria, placing objects before the first red line is not allowed. Move it to 00:01:820 - (offset=1820) I'm so out of time with the rules haha, fixed.

Heavy

  1. 00:28:020 (3,4) - you can build a triplet here? this can be a better transition between different song sections, and actually follows the instrument, not overmapping. It doesn't really fit there imo.
  2. 00:49:420 (6,7,8) - suggest swap the coordinate of 6 and 7,8. square makes circle 4-9 look like one part, but actually there's 2.5 beats off between 6 and 7,8. i think separating them in flow can express the song better. I tried that but it feels like the spacing is too big if I do that.
  3. 00:59:820 - add a circle on (324,184) to make the drum beat clickable. Yep, this is a good suggestion, fixed.
  4. 01:04:620 (4) - shorten this slider to a 1/2 one and add a circle on the next sliderhead, to make the drum beat not get covered by sliderslide. appriximately like the screenshot below: I'm following the vocals in this part, not the drums.
  5. 01:24:220 (3,4) - i think ignoring 01:24:420 - and 01:25:420 - two drum beats is not a good idea for a top diff. i tried to rearrange the pattern here:
    Same as above, was following the vocals rather than the drums. I understand your point, though.
  6. 01:36:820 - same as above. add a circle on (200,220) And same as above.
  7. some similar drum beats that i think should not be ignored: 01:27:620 - 01:30:820 - 01:34:220 - 01:37:220 - 02:19:020 - 02:21:620 - 02:25:220 - 02:31:620 - 02:38:020 - 02:41:220 - at least you can cover them by sliderhead, reverse point or slidertail, not by sliderslide. I wanted to map them by following vocals, that's why they're using the sliderslide.

Medium

  1. 01:09:020 (4,5,6) - move these three circles leftward, to make the last one exactly on (256, ) Fixed.
  2. 01:11:820 - add a circle on (180,320) I left a break here on purpose.

Light

  1. 00:15:420 (3) - suggest remove this circle, to avoid misread of rhythm here. I don't think it's a good idea to skip such an important beat, it would even more confusing without it actually.
  2. 00:53:820 (3) - 00:55:420 (2) - move them downward to make them exactly on ( ,192) Fixed.

r.i.p. Chester

Thanks for the unexpected mod!

Updated.
ZekeyHache
[Heavy]
  1. 02:09:820 (7) - Seems this note should be snapped at 02:09:720 - to match the vocals (1/4 beat). Right now feels very off~
  2. 02:16:220 (5) - Same story
  3. 00:34:020 (6) - 00:40:420 (7) - 00:53:220 (6) - I don't feel sure about these ones, please ask for opinions.
I hope I can come back soon ;w;
Shad0w1and
Topic Starter
Andrea
Thank you for the recheck ezek, I fixed 02:09:820 (7) - and 02:16:220 (5) -.

As for the others, I had a talk with Natsu and he says that they're fine, I also think the same, got many testplayers to try that part and it also seemed fine.

Natsu
13:06 Andrea: Natsusita can I have your opinion about some snappings? me and ezek are unsure about them @_@
13:06 Natsu: sure
13:07 *Andrea is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1367473 Linkin Park - Heavy Feat. Kiiara [Heavy]]
13:07 Andrea: p/6162651 this post
13:07 Andrea: they sound weird on blue tick to me, I tried using 1/8 and it sounds better, but I'm still unsure if it's the way to go
13:08 Andrea: for example 02:09:770 (7) -
13:08 Andrea: or 02:16:170 (5) -
13:09 Natsu: it's on blue tho
13:09 Natsu: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8718201
13:09 Natsu: try that maybe
13:09 Andrea: both of them?
13:10 Natsu: the second one is on blue too
13:10 Natsu: but there is something at the white tick too
13:10 Andrea: 00:34:020 (6) - 00:40:420 (7) - 00:53:220 (6) -
13:10 Andrea: he is also unsure about these
13:10 Andrea: but I think they're fine
13:12 Natsu: they aare fine iimo
13:12 Natsu: vocals are always some how off xd
13:13 Andrea: yeah weird stuff ikr lol
13:13 Andrea: okay then I'll fix these two and keep the others, just like I thought
13:13 Natsu: i'd say I'll qualify, but gerito will kill me
13:13 Natsu: haha

Updated and also added a new video, thanks a lot Shad0w1and! <3
ZekeyHache
Cya
Nyukai
Oh well, that was fast xD Well done.
Gordon123
so... :(
Aurele
hello boo

General
  1. Folder is clean!
  2. Just to make sure you understand my mod, I've started by modding the hardest difficulty at first.
Light
  1. 00:45:020 - This is like the beginning of a new measure on 00:41:820 (1) - , so technically the rhythm should be slightly different from what you've done previously. In this case, I'd suggest you to add a circle here, it will emphasize the loud bass right here. Also, if you add a circle, make sure to add a new combo as well since it does not belong to the previous combo.
  2. 00:48:220 (2) - Based on the previous suggestion, I suggest you to add a new combo as well.
  3. 00:49:020 (3) - I suggest you to do something different with this slider since it goes the same way as the previous slider and it makes things pretty much repetitive. What you could do, is maybe do a 90 degree rotation anywhere you want (I'd suggest an anti-clockwise rotation).
  4. 01:53:020 (2) - I've seen this slider somewhere.. oh right, on the Heavy difficulty. (02:11:420 (3) -) I suggest you to make a better blanket with the previous circle, it will look neater.
  5. 02:37:020 (1) - Since you are starting a new combo here, I do not suggest you to stack this circle with 02:33:820 (1) - and go to the same direction. Instead, I'm suggesting you to move this circle to x:420 y:360, it will be aligned with the previous circles (1) and (4) and you will go to the opposite direction,
    which will make a better effect.
Good!~

Medium
  1. 00:29:020 (1) - If you look at what I said in the Hard difficulty, I didn't really like the shape of the slider. That goes applies to this one also. The curve between the straight lines looks poorly done and I know you can do better.
  2. 00:34:020 - I would add a circle right here to make an emphasis on the words: "Why is everything so heavy?" Even if it's a normal difficulty, it is totally suitable to add one here. At least, try to do something that would make more emphasis on the vocals. You should technically do the same to 00:40:420 - and 00:53:220 -
  3. 00:57:020 (3) - Let's compare the combos of this note and 01:22:620 (1) - . On the first point, you didn't add a new combo because the slider has a reverse arrow and you believed that the first half of the slider was part of the combo, so you keeps the combo on and left the next three notes on the same combo even thought you knew it would be too long for a combo. On the other hand, on the second point, you added a new combo to the slider, and I really can't understand why. What I am suggesting you, to help out a bit with the consistency, is to delete the new combo to 01:22:620 (1) - , add a new combo to 01:23:820 (2) - and delete the new combo to 01:25:020 (1) - .
  4. 01:29:020 (1) - Right here, you have to follow what I previously said, so obviously, you'll need to delete the new combo here and you will need to add a new one to 01:30:220 (4) - .
  5. 01:41:820 (1) - Same thing will apply here: Delete the new combo, then add one to 01:43:020 (2) - . It will be so much better like that now :). After that, you will need to do the same for the next kiai time, to make sure everything is consistent.
  6. 02:16:420 - I guess you might look to the first suggestions to understand why I'd add a circle here.
  7. 02:41:820 (1,2,3) - I feel like it would be nicer to take these three circles and you follow what you did with the last three circles, but instead, you could spread it even more. Here's an example:
Nice~!

Heavy
  1. 00:29:020 (1) - I personally do not like the shape of this slider. It would be better if it was shaped in a way that would make it rounder to follow your usual mapping style.
    Example
    THEN



    NOW

  2. 00:57:820 (6) - This circle does not represent the vocals to its fullest. I'd recommend changing that for a 1/1 slider instead to give more feedbacks.
  3. 01:26:620 (1,2,3) - The movement to catch the first note does not feel confortable nor natural because the previous slider's shape faces up and you have to do a very weird comeback movement. I'd recommend doing something else, maybe you could try to do something similar to this:
  4. 01:31:820 (8) - It might feel like a joke, but I swear to god, I never wanted to say this ever again.. With Grid Size:Tiny, literally move this circle one grid to the left. This circle is not prefectly aligned with the two previous ones.
  5. 02:11:420 (3) - Don't you want to do a better blanket with the previous circle? I believe it would be better if you do so.. To do it, you can add two more nodes between the red ones and spread them even.
Should be good!~

if there's anything, let me know! :)
!
Topic Starter
Andrea
Gabe

Gabe wrote:

hello boo

General
  1. Folder is clean!
  2. Just to make sure you understand my mod, I've started by modding the hardest difficulty at first.
Light
  1. 00:45:020 - This is like the beginning of a new measure on 00:41:820 (1) - , so technically the rhythm should be slightly different from what you've done previously. In this case, I'd suggest you to add a circle here, it will emphasize the loud bass right here. Also, if you add a circle, make sure to add a new combo as well since it does not belong to the previous combo. I actually left an empty space here because I wanted to follow only the claps in the background on both sliders.
  2. 00:48:220 (2) - Based on the previous suggestion, I suggest you to add a new combo as well. No fix for this then, I guess.
  3. 00:49:020 (3) - I suggest you to do something different with this slider since it goes the same way as the previous slider and it makes things pretty much repetitive. What you could do, is maybe do a 90 degree rotation anywhere you want (I'd suggest an anti-clockwise rotation). I made it the same way on purpose actually, to make players notice the shape change.
  4. 01:53:020 (2) - I've seen this slider somewhere.. oh right, on the Heavy difficulty. (02:11:420 (3) -) I suggest you to make a better blanket with the previous circle, it will look neater. I feel like the blanket is fine already.
  5. 02:37:020 (1) - Since you are starting a new combo here, I do not suggest you to stack this circle with 02:33:820 (1) - and go to the same direction. Instead, I'm suggesting you to move this circle to x:420 y:360, it will be aligned with the previous circles (1) and (4) and you will go to the opposite direction,
    which will make a better effect. I wanted to make a full square that begins and ends on the same place, my idea would disappear if I do that, sadly.
Good!~

Medium
  1. 00:29:020 (1) - If you look at what I said in the Hard difficulty, I didn't really like the shape of the slider. That goes applies to this one also. The curve between the straight lines looks poorly done and I know you can do better. I agree, improved the slider shape.
  2. 00:34:020 - I would add a circle right here to make an emphasis on the words: "Why is everything so heavy?" Even if it's a normal difficulty, it is totally suitable to add one here. At least, try to do something that would make more emphasis on the vocals. You should technically do the same to 00:40:420 - and 00:53:220 - I understand your point but I have to deny this since I didn't use a single 1/2 pattern in a row in the entire difficulty, it would be inconsistent and out of place if I do this.
  3. 00:57:020 (3) - Let's compare the combos of this note and 01:22:620 (1) - . On the first point, you didn't add a new combo because the slider has a reverse arrow and you believed that the first half of the slider was part of the combo, so you keeps the combo on and left the next three notes on the same combo even thought you knew it would be too long for a combo. On the other hand, on the second point, you added a new combo to the slider, and I really can't understand why. What I am suggesting you, to help out a bit with the consistency, is to delete the new combo to 01:22:620 (1) - , add a new combo to 01:23:820 (2) - and delete the new combo to 01:25:020 (1) - . Alright that seems reasonable enough, fixed.
  4. 01:29:020 (1) - Right here, you have to follow what I previously said, so obviously, you'll need to delete the new combo here and you will need to add a new one to 01:30:220 (4) - . Fixed.
  5. 01:41:820 (1) - Same thing will apply here: Delete the new combo, then add one to 01:43:020 (2) - . It will be so much better like that now :). After that, you will need to do the same for the next kiai time, to make sure everything is consistent. Fixed.
  6. 02:16:420 - I guess you might look to the first suggestions to understand why I'd add a circle here. Denied for the same reason of above.
  7. 02:41:820 (1,2,3) - I feel like it would be nicer to take these three circles and you follow what you did with the last three circles, but instead, you could spread it even more. Here's an example:
    Did something similiar to your suggestion, so it's fixed.
Nice~!

Heavy
  1. 00:29:020 (1) - I personally do not like the shape of this slider. It would be better if it was shaped in a way that would make it rounder to follow your usual mapping style. Fixed the slider shape, it should be way better now, thanks.
    THEN



    NOW

  2. 00:57:820 (6) - This circle does not represent the vocals to its fullest. I'd recommend changing that for a 1/1 slider instead to give more feedbacks.
    Fixed but made the slider end on blue tick instead, it fits with the vocals better.
  3. 01:26:620 (1,2,3) - The movement to catch the first note does not feel confortable nor natural because the previous slider's shape faces up and you have to do a very weird comeback movement. I'd recommend doing something else, maybe you could try to do something similar to this:
    The current flow seems fine to me.
  4. 01:31:820 (8) - It might feel like a joke, but I swear to god, I never wanted to say this ever again.. With Grid Size:Tiny, literally move this circle one grid to the left. This circle is not prefectly aligned with the two previous ones. Fixed the entire pattern here and there instead.
  5. 02:11:420 (3) - Don't you want to do a better blanket with the previous circle? I believe it would be better if you do so.. To do it, you can add two more nodes between the red ones and spread them even. I think this one is fine, like the one you mentioned in Normal difficulty.
Should be good!~

if there's anything, let me know! :)
!

Thanks for checking, much appreciated!

Will update soon.
Gero
I'll take a look at this soon.
Topic Starter
Andrea
Updated fixes from Gabe's mod.
ZekeyHache
Ay mami
Gero
Awesome as always.

Log
19:09 Andrea: btw I should slap you, you qualified something again ewe
19:10 Gero: I need to clean my list, you know x'D
19:10 Andrea: QAQ
19:11 Gero: ezek rebub it
19:14 Gero: well, let's IRC
19:14 Andrea: I still appreciate it tho
19:14 Gero: gonna kill you with lot of nazi stuff
19:14 Gero: no joke
19:14 Gero: xD
19:14 Andrea: oh fuck my life
19:14 Andrea: xD
19:15 Gero: I won't
19:15 Gero: could you np it?
19:15 Andrea: good ;w;
19:15 *Andrea is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1367473 Linkin Park - Heavy Feat. Kiiara [Heavy]]
19:15 Gero: prepare yourself huehue
19:15 Gero: jk <3
19:15 Andrea: rip me
19:15 Andrea: and this map like got 8 mods
19:15 Andrea: in a few days
19:15 Andrea: xD
19:16 Gero: dling
19:20 Gero: 00:29:020 (1) - The curves of this slider could be improved a little bit more, seeme like they're a bit unpolished. So how about to do this instead? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8740523
19:21 Andrea: that slider again fml
19:21 Andrea: can you just send me the code? xD
19:21 Gero: Sure thing
19:21 Andrea: I'm bad at that it seems orz
19:23 Gero: 01:06:020 - You're ignoring the vocals at this section, I think would be a lot better if you consider to add a circle here, https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8740536 You can do this to fix your pattern easily with this
19:25 Gero: https://gero.s-ul.eu/i4xAKw91 Slider
19:27 Gero: 01:28:220 (4,5,6) - I'd like to CTRL+H these circles due that the spacing between (3) and (4) is broken. so if you change that the flow will be a lot better and you'll keep the pattern as it is as well
19:28 Andrea: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8740559
19:28 Andrea: what do you think of this instead? owo
19:28 Andrea: on 01:06
19:29 Gero: Looks good o3o
19:29 Gero: That's all for Heavy
19:29 Andrea: okay let me check next :3
19:30 Andrea: okay all fixed o/
19:32 *Gero is editing [http://osu.ppy.sh/b/1367475 Linkin Park - Heavy Feat. Kiiara [Medium]]
19:33 Gero: 00:49:420 - The same about ignoring vocals, since you've mapped all of them even in this difficulty. I'd like to add a circle here.
19:33 Gero: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8740578 A suggestion to avoid changing lot of things
19:33 Gero: 00:50:620 (5) - Stack (5) on (2)
19:36 Gero: 01:38:620 (1) - I think this combo isn't necessary due that previously you did this 01:23:820 (1,2,3,4,5) - while is exactly the same kind of vocals and rhythm
19:36 Gero: 02:23:420 (1) - Same as above
19:37 Gero: That's all for Medium
19:37 Andrea: 01:19:420 (1) - I did it because of this
19:37 Andrea: fixed the other pattern
19:37 Gero: Alright
19:37 Gero: Just keep it consistent and it'll be fine :3
19:38 Andrea: actually whatever, I'll change them
19:38 Andrea: just leaving that since it's the start of the kiai
19:38 Gero: Up to you
19:39 Andrea: ok nvm they look weird so I'll keep x'D
19:39 Gero: Alright xD
19:39 Andrea: I used a lot of double combos so keeping only that is weird rip
19:40 Andrea: okay let's go to Light :3
19:40 Gero: 01:40:220 (2) - </3
19:40 Andrea: weird curve? xD
19:40 Gero: Yeah, that's all xD
19:40 Gero: Want me to do a better one? :3
19:40 Andrea: yes please orz
19:40 Andrea: you're better at this xD
19:42 Gero: https://gero.s-ul.eu/OIrSFHY5
19:42 Andrea: thanks ;w;
19:42 Gero: Lovely set, I really like it <3
19:43 Gero: as always <3
19:43 Gero: that's all, go ahead and update it
19:43 Andrea: way better than mine o3o
19:43 Andrea: okay let me update it <333 thank you so much :D
Gero
~ Qualified ~

EDIT: I forgot about the 24 hours. I've got confused by it. Could a QAT Disqualify it for some hours more?
I'll be back in 24 hours.
Gordon123
;w;
ZekeyHache
Ay pero que bruto, Gero xDDD
Okoayu
reverted to bubble

u guys speedrank too fast
worst fl player
damn that was quick lol
Aurele
before you do anything, I have to answer back to my mod post. there are some things I still disagree :p
Topic Starter
Andrea
Then please point them out so I can reply properly to you.

Even though I have already been clear enough in my previous reply (for the things that I rejected, that is).
Aurele
Light
  1. 00:45:020 - This is like the beginning of a new measure on 00:41:820 (1) - , so technically the rhythm should be slightly different from what you've done previously. In this case, I'd suggest you to add a circle here, it will emphasize the loud bass right here. Also, if you add a circle, make sure to add a new combo as well since it does not belong to the previous combo. I actually left an empty space here because I wanted to follow only the claps in the background on both sliders. As I might understand your point, I still believe a circle should be added, no matter what. In this case, you might as well just simply delete 00:41:820 (1) - and 00:48:220 (2) - since they are not following your idea of following the claps only. (I am really not suggesting you to do so, because it would be terrible,) but I'd really add a circle there to follow the bass which the other two circles does.
    On the other hand, I'm still suggesting you to add a new combo to 00:48:220 (2) - because it's not following the same song aspect as the previous object.
Heavy
  1. 01:26:620 (1,2,3) - The movement to catch the first note does not feel confortable nor natural because the previous slider's shape faces up and you have to do a very weird comeback movement. I'd recommend doing something else, maybe you could try to do something similar to this:
    The current flow seems fine to me. Even thought your decision is not bad, I am still suggesting this one again. The cursor movement still feels uncomfortable to play as the first slider points up to the right as the next objects faces down in a straight line below it, then back up to the previous point. As it does not match the song either way, I do not see such reasons to keep it that way :(
  2. 02:11:420 (3) - Don't you want to do a better blanket with the previous circle? I believe it would be better if you do so.. To do it, you can add two more nodes between the red ones and spread them even. I think this one is fine, like the one you mentioned in Normal difficulty. I mean.. this is a great blanket to you..?
Topic Starter
Andrea
Gabe

Gabe wrote:

Light
  1. 00:45:020 - This is like the beginning of a new measure on 00:41:820 (1) - , so technically the rhythm should be slightly different from what you've done previously. In this case, I'd suggest you to add a circle here, it will emphasize the loud bass right here. Also, if you add a circle, make sure to add a new combo as well since it does not belong to the previous combo. I actually left an empty space here because I wanted to follow only the claps in the background on both sliders. As I might understand your point, I still believe a circle should be added, no matter what. In this case, you might as well just simply delete 00:41:820 (1) - and 00:48:220 (2) - since they are not following your idea of following the claps only. (I am really not suggesting you to do so, because it would be terrible,) but I'd really add a circle there to follow the bass which the other two circles does.
    On the other hand, I'm still suggesting you to add a new combo to 00:48:220 (2) - because it's not following the same song aspect as the previous object.
    I tried once again your suggestion in different ways but I still don't like it sadly. I still believe the current pattern is fine already, newbies won't have any problem either way. Also, my clap idea was meant from the first slider to the second one, the circle before them doesn't have anything to do with them.
Heavy
  1. 01:26:620 (1,2,3) - The movement to catch the first note does not feel confortable nor natural because the previous slider's shape faces up and you have to do a very weird comeback movement. I'd recommend doing something else, maybe you could try to do something similar to this:
    The current flow seems fine to me. Even thought your decision is not bad, I am still suggesting this one again. The cursor movement still feels uncomfortable to play as the first slider points up to the right as the next objects faces down in a straight line below it, then back up to the previous point. As it does not match the song either way, I do not see such reasons to keep it that way :( I had multiple players testing that pattern and everyone was comfortable with it, I really like how it is, so I still have to disagree, sorry.
  2. 02:11:420 (3) - Don't you want to do a better blanket with the previous circle? I believe it would be better if you do so.. To do it, you can add two more nodes between the red ones and spread them even. I think this one is fine, like the one you mentioned in Normal difficulty. I mean.. this is a great blanket to you..? I used the same exact blanket on Light difficulty here 01:52:220 (1,2) - It looks good to me already, honestly.

Thanks for rechecking the map once again, but I still want to keep the current patterns.
Gero


~ Chester Bennington (1976-2017) ~
Natsu
congratz Andreita
Shmiklak
rip ;w;
milr_

M a r v o l l o wrote:

rip ;w;
pw384
chester we miss you
Doyak
Hello, Andrea! I'd like to ask for the references of the metadata you used. Here's what I've found:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dmQ3QWpy1Q
Official video, says 'Heavy - Linkin Park (feat. Kiiara)' on the title. Or in the description says '"Heavy" (feat. Kiiara)'. Two alternatives can be used from this.

Artist: Linkin Park
Title: Heavy (feat. Kiiara)
or
Artist: Linkin Park (feat. Kiiara)
Title: Heavy
Notice the lowercase 'f' and parenthesizes.

Another reference I found is the album.
http://imgur.com/AwlIuFG
Well, they used capital letters for everything in this album. If you use this as a reference, you can't do much other than using "HEAVY FEAT. KIIARA" title.
Though, searching on the official website, we can find some more.
http://linkinpark.warnerbrosrecords.com ... nter-store
http://linkinpark.warnerbrosrecords.com ... nter-store
http://linkinpark.warnerbrosrecords.com ... nter-store
http://linkinpark.warnerbrosrecords.com ... nter-store
All these four different packages use this: Heavy (feat. Kiiara). This is same as the 2nd alternation I suggested above.

Any other references I've searched so far are not official, including external shopping websites they linked on their website (I didn't bother myself searching through every single of their SNS accounts). If you have any official references that justifies the current metadata, please reply here.
Kyouren
We following from the back cover album!

Like this case:
t/592137

Actually, Rizen say in that album is all capital but I think you need ask Rizen for her reason because i'm forget xd

But for my personal, I think it's same because with capital or without capital, it's still same. I'm agree with someone who buying the real original CD and screenshot to show our which metadata is correct :/
IamKwaN
if back cover shows title of all capital letters, please follow
we do not want to raise metadata to a level where it can be determined by inserting subjectivity
we would allow people choosing among official 1, 2, 3 but not 1A, 2B, 3C based on 1, 2, 3

if you do not want to use all-capital-letter title, then follow some other official ones mentioned by Doyak
if you have an official source showing exactly current title, please show us, thanks
Topic Starter
Andrea
I actually used at the beginning both of Doyak's options but I have been told to change it from ezek after I have seen KittyAdventure's post.


The album shows like everything is in caps, but it's not actually, if you go search everywhere no title from the album is actually entirely capitalized.

It's quite confusing because YouTube says Linkin Park (feat. Kiiara) - Heavy while iTunes says Linkin Park - Heavy (feat. Kiiara), in the end the album says Linkin Park - Heavy Feat. Kiiara as KittyAdventure already showed to us.

That said, I don't know what to do at this point really, current Artist/Title is acceptable to me imo.
Doyak
"If you go search everywhere" and I need an official source that actually indicates that the album is not capitalized. iTunes is not considered to be official. The only official things we have so far are the capture of the CD cover, or the official website I've provided.
Topic Starter
Andrea
The YouTube channel can be considered something official, and if you check all of their songs from the album One More Light, none is using fully capitalized titles.

Here's the link: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=P ... 8qMZrgjjDZ

Also, on the official site that you linked, all the songs aren't fully capitalized either.
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply