1. osu!community
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked/Approved Beatmaps

posted
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on 07 July 2017 at 17:20:09

Artist: Mili
Title: Vulnerability
Tags: Miracle milk electronic saihate records HAMO hamoloid Yamato Kasai
BPM: 166
Filesize: 4713kb
Play Time: 02:00
Difficulties Available:
  1. Easy (1.53 stars, 135 notes)
  2. Hard (3.36 stars, 303 notes)
  3. Mell (4.48 stars, 385 notes)
  4. Normal (1.98 stars, 174 notes)


Download: Mili - Vulnerability
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------



What makes you vulnerable makes you beautiful.







- Mir
- Pentori
Thanks for being very helpful guys <3

#2
posted
Hello" :D
General
Turn off widescreen support
Easy
01:58:650 (1) - delete this , change it into slider from 01:58:469 until 01:58:650
Normal
00:32:446 - add notes here
01:58:650 (1) - delete this , change it into slider from 01:58:469 until 01:58:650

Good Luck! :D
posted

Rizevim wrote:

Hello" :D
General
Turn off widescreen support
Easy
01:58:650 (1) - delete this , change it into slider from 01:58:469 until 01:58:650 No, I like the strength of the single note alone. Gives it a strong feeling.
Normal
00:32:446 - add notes here Okay
01:58:650 (1) - delete this , change it into slider from 01:58:469 until 01:58:650 Same with Easy.

Good Luck! :D


Some things changed I guess, thanks
posted
hello m4m
[General]
  • good song <3

[Colours]
  1. Your colors do not match what is shown on the background,try to use this variant :
    Combo1 : 255,140,85
    Combo2 : 101,148,226
    Combo3 : 199,199,199
    Combo4 : 255,193,228
    Combo5 : 206,254,82

[Easy]

  • 00:08:409 (2,3) - better blanket pls : https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8142318
    00:14:193 (1) - Move it below because it overlaps with health bar
    01:42:747 (2) - Remake this moment,You have a not very convenient transition here 01:41:301 (1,2,3) - this,I suggest you remake like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8142398

[Normal]
  1. Better use CS=3.5 or 4 for normal diff
    00:51:060 (1) - Bends in this slider are not very beautiful, maybe you will do so> https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8142477 ? This slider transfers a small rhythm of music//
    01:08:409 (1) - 3rd part of slider add Finish - Because I hear a strong blow there
    01:52:506 (4,1) - please blanket

[Hard]

  • 00:18:530 (1) - This bend does not make any sense - make it more beautiful
    00:25:036 - 00:25:940 - You miss out here a lot of sound, I suggest you do it like this :

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Good Luck ;)
posted
hi nm

Hard

  • > I'm curious about why 00:01:723 (2) - is placed on 00:01:723 - and not 00:01:903 -
    > I think that 00:03:349 (1,2,3,4) - needs more emphasis and intensity
    > What are you following in 00:25:036 (1,2,3) - ?
    > 01:46:180 (2,3) - stack?
Mell

  • > I don't really think 00:02:807 (2) - is following the instrument you're following because 00:02:265 (1,2,3) - is similar to 00:06:602 (1,2) -
    > 00:44:915 (2,3) - what is this following?
    > 00:48:168 (2,3) - even if you're following the other sound, I don't think it's supposed to be overlapping each other in a way because for most of the segment your sliders are spaced in accordance to the song. Also it's similar to 00:43:831 (2,3) - so maybe having it as sliders that don't overlap or circles would be better
    > 00:53:590 (2,3) - Similar to 00:44:915 (2,3) - ,
    > 01:13:831 - I think something like this is better:



I only pointed out parts that seemed odd to me. Hope it helps. Gl :)
posted

Gordon123 wrote:

hello m4m
[General]
  • good song <3

[Colours]
  1. Your colors do not match what is shown on the background,try to use this variant :
    Combo1 : 255,140,85
    Combo2 : 101,148,226
    Combo3 : 199,199,199
    Combo4 : 255,193,228
    Combo5 : 206,254,82
That's because they're supposed to represent the weather and mood that the song gives off. Also, the mood of the combo colours get more intense and "evil" around the peaks of the song as if a storm has arrived and such.

[Easy]

  • 00:08:409 (2,3) - better blanket pls : https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8142318
    00:14:193 (1) - Move it below because it overlaps with health bar It doesn't overlap the hp bar with the default skin which is what you should base it off, but I'll try and do something.
    01:42:747 (2) - Remake this moment,You have a not very convenient transition here 01:41:301 (1,2,3) - this,I suggest you remake like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8142398 Hmm, I won't because the kiai and this part has quite a bit of sharp flow to emphasize the peak of the song, it also goes along with the combo colour idea to more accurately represent my ideas of what the song is about.

[Normal]
  1. Better use CS=3.5 or 4 for normal diff Mmm, not really..? CS for a diff like this can be safe around CS2 - 4
    00:51:060 (1) - Bends in this slider are not very beautiful, maybe you will do so> https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8142477 ? This slider transfers a small rhythm of music// The slider I have currently uses the rhythm you want me to use too.
    01:08:409 (1) - 3rd part of slider add Finish - Because I hear a strong blow there The blow is actually at the start of the kiai. I'll use a whistle here though since it fits more with the sound here.
    01:52:506 (4,1) - please blanket

[Hard]

  • 00:18:530 (1) - This bend does not make any sense - make it more beautiful What do you mean by "beautiful"? That's heavily subjective.
    Anyway, it emphasizes the strong sound which contrasts the slider from the rest of the map, almost making it dissonant.

    00:25:036 - 00:25:940 - You miss out here a lot of sound, I suggest you do it like this :

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Good Luck ;)


Thanks, fixed a couple of things.
posted

crystalinfusion wrote:

hi nm

Hard

  • > I'm curious about why 00:01:723 (2) - is placed on 00:01:723 - and not 00:01:903 - I'll think about changing it, although it doesn't really affect anything gameplay-wise.
    > I think that 00:03:349 (1,2,3,4) - needs more emphasis and intensity Sure
    > What are you following in 00:25:036 (1,2,3) - ? Hmm? It's a simplified version of the melody. The 1/4 rhythms are a bit too complex for a hard.
    > 01:46:180 (2,3) - stack? Okay
Mell

  • > I don't really think 00:02:807 (2) - is following the instrument you're following because 00:02:265 (1,2,3) - is similar to 00:06:602 (1,2) - It just adds some variation to the map instead of blandly following strictly one instrument the whole time. idk if you have a serious problem with it, I can always change it.
    > 00:44:915 (2,3) - what is this following? You can definitely hear the bell ringing in the song.
    > 00:48:168 (2,3) - even if you're following the other sound, I don't think it's supposed to be overlapping each other in a way because for most of the segment your sliders are spaced in accordance to the song. Also it's similar to 00:43:831 (2,3) - so maybe having it as sliders that don't overlap or circles would be better It's similar in a way but it isn't. You can hear a melody playing over the strong noises which is why I had the incentive to place the sliders in accordance to how I placed them. For me to overlap them, it doesn't play right and it doesn't look good overall. I don't want to change because I like this idea.
    > 00:53:590 (2,3) - Similar to 00:44:915 (2,3) - ,
    > 01:13:831 - I think something like this is better:

    Instead I'll put a NC on 01:14:554 (2) - to make the NC patterning consistent.



I only pointed out parts that seemed odd to me. Hope it helps. Gl :)

Thanks for the mod!
posted

Alphabet wrote:

That's because they're supposed to represent the weather and mood that the song gives off. Also, the mood of the combo colours get more intense and "evil" around the peaks of the song as if a storm has arrived and such.

Then at least use a darker hue of red instead of one that looks like solid red, like 128,0,0 {maroon, otherwise known as a color of blood}.
[Easy]
  1. 00:12:024 (1) - 00:38:048 (1) - 00:59:735 (1) - you're overlapping with the slidertail in this case; 01:41:301 (1) might be fine since the path feels more defined
    Avoid overlapping circles, slider heads, and slider tails. These can be confusing for new players. 1/1 overlaps due to distance snapping should be avoided with higher spacing or slider velocity.


[Hard]
  1. 01:06:241 (1,2,3) - 01:07:325 (1,2,3) - are you emphasizing certain sounds by inconsistently spacing these? if not, reposition (2) in both parts
  2. 01:29:734 (1) - you should differentiate from curved shape to indicate that it's clearly 3/4


[Mell]
  1. 01:13:469 (2) - the violin sounds like it's 1/3 instead of 1/2



  2. 01:15:096 (6) - you should space this further apart to emphasize how powerful the thumps are. It also forms a neat triangle pattern.
  3. 01:30:186 (4,5) - it would be less awkward if you kept the downward motion going with Ctrl+g, especially since you've just introduced a completely new pattern {isolated doubles}
  4. 01:35:698 - you could probably do some cool-looking slider so that the melody doesn't feel undermapped
  5. 02:00:006 (2,1) - For readability sake, space these a bit farther out. I got the impression that 02:00:006 (2) was part of the slider.
posted

F1r3tar wrote:

Alphabet wrote:

That's because they're supposed to represent the weather and mood that the song gives off. Also, the mood of the combo colours get more intense and "evil" around the peaks of the song as if a storm has arrived and such.

Then at least use a darker hue of red instead of one that looks like solid red, like 128,0,0 {maroon, otherwise known as a color of blood}. Sure
[Easy]
  1. 00:12:024 (1) - 00:38:048 (1) - 00:59:735 (1) - you're overlapping with the slidertail in this case; 01:41:301 (1) might be fine since the path feels more defined I liked the use of them since it then remains consistent with the rest of the mapset but I'll widen the angle so the turn is more visible, although it kinda looks visible enough as is, also I'll leave the third one because I think it's common sense to tell where that slider is going.
    Avoid overlapping circles, slider heads, and slider tails. These can be confusing for new players. 1/1 overlaps due to distance snapping should be avoided with higher spacing or slider velocity.


[Hard]
  1. 01:06:241 (1,2,3) - 01:07:325 (1,2,3) - are you emphasizing certain sounds by inconsistently spacing these? if not, reposition (2) in both parts Yeah, it's to emphasize the sound of the violin decreasing in intensity.
  2. 01:29:734 (1) - you should differentiate from curved shape to indicate that it's clearly 3/4 Fixed


[Mell]
  1. 01:13:469 (2) - the violin sounds like it's 1/3 instead of 1/2 The ending of the violin here is not clearly distinguishable and it seems weird to suddenly have a longer-than-usual break here, not to mention it provides a smooth transition for the next pattern. I also like 1/2 since it accompanies for more than just the violin in the background which is what I was aiming to do through the whole map.



  2. 01:15:096 (6) - you should space this further apart to emphasize how powerful the thumps are. It also forms a neat triangle pattern. I like it
  3. 01:30:186 (4,5) - it would be less awkward if you kept the downward motion going with Ctrl+g, especially since you've just introduced a completely new pattern {isolated doubles} Okay
  4. 01:35:698 - you could probably do some cool-looking slider so that the melody doesn't feel undermapped Hmm, I don't like that idea.
    The break was meant to give the impression that the storm is over, however it isn't yet.
  5. 02:00:006 (2,1) - For readability sake, space these a bit farther out. I got the impression that 02:00:006 (2) was part of the slider. how do you read stacks then xd Fixed


Thanks for the mod
posted
HI! you requested mods in #modreqs, so im here to see if i can help you with your map
Im going to be specific as much as i can, so lets see what you have.

Easy:

1. 00:49:976 (2) uwu (Idea/Suggestion) http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8237764? it may flow better

The rest looks amazing


Normal:

Perfect, just perfect


Hard:

1. 00:53:952 (3) - try moving this slider to X:48-Y:164, and the gray dot to X:20-Y:88 or X:24-Y:88. Im suggesting this because this will give the sliders kind of a similar space, and it might look good https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8237970

2. 01:04:072 (1,2) - should this have the same spacing that you used with 00:58:470 (2,3) ? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8238006 like that

3. 01:11:662 (3,4) - should this have the same spacing that you used in 01:14:554 (3,4) ?


Vulnerability:

1. 00:51:060 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - if this part sounds the same... why 00:51:783 (5,6) goes to other direction, but 00:51:060 (1,2,3,4) doesnt? :S idk, but making them go in the same way like is good idea for you? :o:o:o


Very small "mod" because everything looks very good... i hope it does help :o
posted

Joe Castle wrote:

HI! you requested mods in #modreqs, so im here to see if i can help you with your map
Im going to be specific as much as i can, so lets see what you have.

Easy:

1. 00:49:976 (2) uwu (Idea/Suggestion) http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8237764? it may flow better Looks good!

The rest looks amazing


Normal:

Perfect, just perfect


Hard:

1. 00:53:952 (3) - try moving this slider to X:48-Y:164, and the gray dot to X:20-Y:88 or X:24-Y:88. Im suggesting this because this will give the sliders kind of a similar space, and it might look good https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8237970 The slider is already at x:48 y:164 and I don't want to move the node around since the slider is a clone of the previous two sliders, just flipped.

2. 01:04:072 (1,2) - should this have the same spacing that you used with 00:58:470 (2,3) ? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8238006 like that Hmm, I don't see any change?

3. 01:11:662 (3,4) - should this have the same spacing that you used in 01:14:554 (3,4) ? I changed the spacing of the first one to be bigger than the second.


Vulnerability:

1. 00:51:060 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - if this part sounds the same... why 00:51:783 (5,6) goes to other direction, but 00:51:060 (1,2,3,4) doesnt? :S idk, but making them go in the same way like is good idea for you? :o:o:oI Ctrl + G'd 5 and 6


Very small "mod" because everything looks very good... i hope it does help :o


Thanks for the mod!
posted
Hello!~

Easy:

00:02:265 (2) - : I think you should change the slider art here so you can introduce the player on how music can differentiate slider's art.Alternatively,you can change the slider art of this 00:01:181 (1) - since the shape of 00:02:265 (2) - is more capable to the rhythm.
00:06:602 (2) - : Same as above
00:13:108 (2,3) - : I don't see any reason to have a clickable note since there is no any characteristic sound to be clickable at this part.Better map it as a slider like 00:12:024 (1) - so you can keep a calm cohesion.

Normal:

00:03:349 (1,2) - : This rhythm is inconsistent with that 1/4 slider,listen how the musics goes.It should be mapped rhythmically like this

00:05:518 (1,2) - : Same thing.
00:20:699 (1) - : The blanket is a little bit off on the top and on the bottom.Maybe space it out a bit

Hard:

00:29:373 (1,2) - : I dont understand the SV change here plus that clickable note make no sense.It is just high toned,the rhythm does not change rapidly in order to speed up the velocity.Better delete that 0,60 SV change and let the slider end on the white tick.
00:31:542 (1) - : 0,80 SV?LOL,rly?Did you place the fastest SV change than all the other ones,just for this specific high tone?The rhythm here is held and calm,its not getting faster or something,so you should avoid doing those SV changes.I see that you are changing the SV later again,so i will just skip them,i hope that you got my point.
00:55:217 (5) - : Why did you emphasize the spacing here only on this note and these 00:54:674 (2,3,4) - have the same spacing?You should emphasize them too cause the beat is getting louder and more louder on each one of them.
01:11:662 (3,4) - : They should be like these 01:10:939 (1,2) - .
01:15:638 (3) - : Same thing.

Mell:

00:13:831 (1,2) - : I dont see any reason behind of this huge jump.There is no any strong or characteristic sound to emphasize them like this.In this case its the exact opposite,the tempo here is getting more silent.You should emphasize this 00:13:470 (3) - instead.
00:31:542 (1,2,3,1,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,1,2,1) - : Same thing from the Hards mod about the SV changes.You should avoid spamming these SV changes in a calm part,the rhythm is the same.
00:55:759 (2) - : Rotate that clockwisely by 25 degrees?
01:08:048 (3) - : Ugly overlap i guess.
01:23:951 (1) - : This pause is akward cause you are in the most intense part of the song,called kiai.You should map two 1/2 sliders to keep a cohesion.
01:29:554 (3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1) - : I think this is better rhythmically .

01:49:072 (4,1,2) - : These should be mapped like 01:49:614 (3,4) - .

Very chilling song,wish you luck.
posted

Nikakis wrote:

Hello!~

Easy:

00:02:265 (2) - : I think you should change the slider art here so you can introduce the player on how music can differentiate slider's art.Alternatively,you can change the slider art of this 00:01:181 (1) - since the shape of 00:02:265 (2) - is more capable to the rhythm. I have a little pattern at the start where every 1/1 slider has the same slider after it
00:06:602 (2) - : Same as above ^
00:13:108 (2,3) - : I don't see any reason to have a clickable note since there is no any characteristic sound to be clickable at this part.Better map it as a slider like 00:12:024 (1) - so you can keep a calm cohesion. No, I like the density of the circle as the loud drum kicks in

Normal:

00:03:349 (1,2) - : This rhythm is inconsistent with that 1/4 slider,listen how the musics goes.It should be mapped rhythmically like this
Yeah but I don't like the density of it at such an early stage of the map. You can see further on that I save the 1/2 sliders until around 00:40:217 - and onwards.
00:05:518 (1,2) - : Same thing.
00:20:699 (1) - : The blanket is a little bit off on the top and on the bottom.Maybe space it out a bit k

Hard:

00:29:373 (1,2) - : I dont understand the SV change here plus that clickable note make no sense.It is just high toned,the rhythm does not change rapidly in order to speed up the velocity.Better delete that 0,60 SV change and let the slider end on the white tick. Huh? You can clearly tell the pitch of the song rising. I changed the SV off the increase / decrease in pitch
00:31:542 (1) - : 0,80 SV?LOL,rly?Did you place the fastest SV change than all the other ones,just for this specific high tone?The rhythm here is held and calm,its not getting faster or something,so you should avoid doing those SV changes.I see that you are changing the SV later again,so i will just skip them,i hope that you got my point. LOL Like I said before, it's how I represented the song and your idea completely changes the idea of the map.
00:55:217 (5) - : Why did you emphasize the spacing here only on this note and these 00:54:674 (2,3,4) - have the same spacing?You should emphasize them too cause the beat is getting louder and more louder on each one of them. So the player can differentiate between the loud drums and the softer notes, Hard difficulties should still have somewhat basic snapping and clearly emphasized sounds are an exception.
01:11:662 (3,4) - : They should be like these 01:10:939 (1,2) - . Makes the map too dense for my liking. Also this same pattern is repeated throughout the whole kiai
01:15:638 (3) - : Same thing. ^

Mell:

00:13:831 (1,2) - : I dont see any reason behind of this huge jump.There is no any strong or characteristic sound to emphasize them like this.In this case its the exact opposite,the tempo here is getting more silent.You should emphasize this 00:13:470 (3) - instead. I must be deaf if nobody can hear the loud transition at 00:14:012 - . You should look at the hitsound patterns, you'll see that the claps go with louder drum beats / the blows and that's how I wanted to emphasize my map
00:31:542 (1,2,3,1,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,1,2,1) - : Same thing from the Hards mod about the SV changes.You should avoid spamming these SV changes in a calm part,the rhythm is the same. Same thing I said before, it completely goes against what I wanted to do.
00:55:759 (2) - : Rotate that clockwisely by 25 degrees? Okay
01:08:048 (3) - : Ugly overlap i guess. Not really, the spacing is decreasing with the pitch
01:23:951 (1) - : This pause is akward cause you are in the most intense part of the song,called kiai.You should map two 1/2 sliders to keep a cohesion. It really isn't since there is pretty much no beat here and only barely audible background instruments
01:29:554 (3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1) - : I think this is better rhythmically . I don't like it, the sliders somewhat ignore some of the foreground beats since it doesn't make the player click them.

01:49:072 (4,1,2) - : These should be mapped like 01:49:614 (3,4) - . I like how it is, it gradually rises in spacing and at the end it rises in rhythm density.
Very chilling song,wish you luck.


Thanks
posted
Yeah woops im late

gen:

Ending time is not the same across all diffs. Mell's is shorter.
01:09:494 - Timing point here says one sample and a green line on the exact same spot says another. THis can bug your map. Delete the green line and set kiai and the sample and volume on the red one. Unless of course, there's an sv change, in which case both lines need to have the same sample setting.

ez:

00:55:036 (3,1,2) - I would like it if they were more linear personally.
01:27:566 (2,3) - Blanketing could improve slightly.
01:40:578 (3,1) - Since the end of (1) is closer to the end of (3), players will try and hit it from that end. please make your flow more obvious.
02:00:096 - Spinner realLLLLly should end here.

nm:

Why snaps in the diff but not easy?
00:07:687 (1,2) - two 1/2 sliders and then a circle would do fantastic.
00:19:614 (5,1) - Slider body blanketing could use some touch ups on the head and tail of the rack on (1).
00:43:108 (2,3,4) - Put the slider where the circles are and the circles where the slider is. Circle should emphasize the stronger sounds.

hd:

00:25:307 - Triplet here. It's more of a prominent sound then where you chose to put the triplet (later in)
00:31:542 (1,2) - Stack. Your target audience wont read anti jumps the same way as a stack. Since you've already defined a stack as a gap in objects in time, let's keep using that for consistency.
01:11:662 - This should be mapped like 01:10:939 (1,2) - since the sound is still going. Doesn't feel right to cut it off.
  • 01:13:831 (1,2,3,4) - ^

01:15:638 (3) - This needs a 1/3 repeat slider because the sound is too prominent here to ignore.
01:27:927 (4) - Circles work better here.
01:29:012 (3,4) - Blanket could use some improvements.
01:29:012 (3,4) - Break?
01:42:385 (4,1) - Not a good idea. Move (1) somewhere else entirely. Your target audience will read this placement as a triplet, as you've previously defined right in this section.
01:54:674 (2,3,4,5) - Sounds here are way too minute for jumps.
01:58:470 (4,5,1) - Unstack these to give (1) lots more emphasis.

gl
posted

PolkaMocha wrote:

Yeah woops im late

gen:

Ending time is not the same across all diffs. Mell's is shorter. Refer to the point on Easy
01:09:494 - Timing point here says one sample and a green line on the exact same spot says another. THis can bug your map. Delete the green line and set kiai and the sample and volume on the red one. Unless of course, there's an sv change, in which case both lines need to have the same sample setting.
Ah, deleted green point
ez:

00:55:036 (3,1,2) - I would like it if they were more linear personally.
01:27:566 (2,3) - Blanketing could improve slightly.
01:40:578 (3,1) - Since the end of (1) is closer to the end of (3), players will try and hit it from that end. please make your flow more obvious.
02:00:096 - Spinner realLLLLly should end here. Imo it's too short of a spinner for an easy / normal / hard so that's why I made the lower diffs have the spinner end when the instruments do.

nm:

Why snaps in the diff but not easy?
00:07:687 (1,2) - two 1/2 sliders and then a circle would do fantastic.
00:19:614 (5,1) - Slider body blanketing could use some touch ups on the head and tail of the rack on (1).
00:43:108 (2,3,4) - Put the slider where the circles are and the circles where the slider is. Circle should emphasize the stronger sounds.

hd:

00:25:307 - Triplet here. It's more of a prominent sound then where you chose to put the triplet (later in)
00:31:542 (1,2) - Stack. Your target audience wont read anti jumps the same way as a stack. Since you've already defined a stack as a gap in objects in time, let's keep using that for consistency.
01:11:662 - This should be mapped like 01:10:939 (1,2) - since the sound is still going. Doesn't feel right to cut it off. I just think it's too much of a spam to have this in a Hard, especially since I've only just introduced it here in the map.
  • 01:13:831 (1,2,3,4) - ^
^
01:15:638 (3) - This needs a 1/3 repeat slider because the sound is too prominent here to ignore.
01:27:927 (4) - Circles work better here.
01:29:012 (3,4) - Blanket could use some improvements.
01:29:012 (3,4) - Break?
01:42:385 (4,1) - Not a good idea. Move (1) somewhere else entirely. Your target audience will read this placement as a triplet, as you've previously defined right in this section. I stacked these since all of my triples in this section aren't. It also introduces the stacking in the slower section right after.
01:54:674 (2,3,4,5) - Sounds here are way too minute for jumps.
01:58:470 (4,5,1) - Unstack these to give (1) lots more emphasis.

gl


Thanks! blank = fixed
posted
Easy
Good work! ;)
Normal
Sector Clear! ;)
Hard
OH MY GOD!
Mill
0:04:434 (1,2) - Please put it on the end of the past slider! 00:03:349 (1,2,3)

Sorry,my mod "very" big! :(
posted
Easy


00:29:373 (1,2) - Blanked

Normal


00:01:181 (1) - Try this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8428202
01:15:277 (1,2,3) - Blanked ?
01:22:506 (3,4) - Too ?

Hard


00:08:771 (5) - Move this under this 00:08:048 (3) -
00:13:831 (4,5) - Avoids putting jump in hard diff


Okay good luck ;)
posted
hard
  1. 00:01:723 (2) - meh isn't interesting to keep such a strong sound on a slider tail
  2. 00:20:337 (5,1) - this spacing deserves a bit more emphasis i guess
  3. 00:46:361 (4,1) - not big fan of 00:46:542 - on a slider tail when all the other beats like this being clickable ones. Also the spacing provided between these 2 is too big. When you compare with parts as 00:42:024 (3,4,1) - or 00:50:699 (3,4,1) - seems completely random spaced. The same goes to 00:55:036 (4,5,1) -, which is also extremely big to this diff
  4. 01:09:855 (2) - why extended?
  5. the whole kiai is a bit messy, it has parts that should be mapped as 1/3 sounds using 1/4 beats instead and inconsistencies between simplified and accurately followed sounds (as 01:10:939 (1,2,3,4) -). A bit hard to point all them out, but with this in mind i think you can improve kiai section a lot.
  6. 01:43:831 (5,6) - you usually don't go for high spacing between two similar weak sounds, why use it here?
  7. 01:50:518 (3,1) - minimal overlap, can be fixed i guess
  8. 01:57:747 (2,3) - definitely not interesting to have in such a calm part


last
  1. 00:31:542 (1) - hmm would be better to go till the red tick as the sound doesn't really ends on the white one
  2. 00:51:060 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - visuals could be improved, i can't really see a clear patterning between these, adjusting 00:51:783 (5,6) - would be pretty nice
  3. 00:51:783 (5,6,1) - flow here plays a bit off than usual, when you compare with parts like 00:40:759 (4,5) - 00:47:626 (3,1) - 00:56:120 (3,1) - that use a clear and common flow this one is receiving a counter one to receive an unecessary emphasis
  4. 01:15:277 (1,2) - seems non-fitting, nothing important can be found on 01:15:457 - to cause the 1/2 jump reasonable. I'd prefer to keep an extended slider here to fit violin sound 01:15:518 - as used on 01:16:000 (1,2) - as an example
  5. 01:17:807 (4) - really going to follow background sound? ending as 1/3 would be nice since u were following violin earlier
  6. 01:49:072 (4,1,2) - maybe use kick sliders for these too, ignoring violin sound here isn't cool, using only on 01:49:614 (3,4) - also seems weird


Adjust volume settings on Normal diff
posted
Sorry, didn't notice these until now :o

YashaPlay wrote:

Easy
Good work! ;)
Normal
Sector Clear! ;)
Hard
OH MY GOD!
Mill
0:04:434 (1,2) - Please put it on the end of the past slider! 00:03:349 (1,2,3) It's to provide some readability.

Sorry,my mod "very" big! :(

No worries! It's actually a good thing if you didn't pick much up I guess xD

Ward74 wrote:

Easy


00:29:373 (1,2) - Blanked Hmm? This isn't meant to be a blanket

Normal


00:01:181 (1) - Try this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8428202 I don't see any point to this.
01:15:277 (1,2,3) - Blanked ? This isn't meant to be a blanket either, it's a linear pattern.
01:22:506 (3,4) - Too ? ^

Hard


00:08:771 (5) - Move this under this 00:08:048 (3) - It's to provide some extra readability since I don't think perfect stacks this early are easy to read unless it's very clear.
00:13:831 (4,5) - Avoids putting jump in hard diff Hmm, jumps are justifiable on emphasized parts like this.


Okay good luck ;)


Thanks for the mod. I didn't change anything though, sorry

Trynna wrote:

hard
  1. 00:01:723 (2) - meh isn't interesting to keep such a strong sound on a slider tail
  2. 00:20:337 (5,1) - this spacing deserves a bit more emphasis i guess
  3. 00:46:361 (4,1) - not big fan of 00:46:542 - on a slider tail when all the other beats like this being clickable ones. Also the spacing provided between these 2 is too big. When you compare with parts as 00:42:024 (3,4,1) - or 00:50:699 (3,4,1) - seems completely random spaced. The same goes to 00:55:036 (4,5,1) -, which is also extremely big to this diff 00:42:024 (3,4,1) - and 00:50:699 (3,4,1) have no instruments with the blow sound, that's why they're not so spaced out as 00:55:036 (4,5,1) - which does have a loud instrument to back that noise up. For 00:46:361 (4,1) I will change though since it kinda doesn't make sense to me either.
  4. 01:09:855 (2) - why extended?
  5. the whole kiai is a bit messy, it has parts that should be mapped as 1/3 sounds using 1/4 beats instead and inconsistencies between simplified and accurately followed sounds (as 01:10:939 (1,2,3,4) -). A bit hard to point all them out, but with this in mind i think you can improve kiai section a lot. I've done this for the kiai since it's a bit too much of a spam for a Hard difficulty imo. If I were to fully map the rhythm it would also make it out of shape to the spread since the Normal focuses on 1/1 and some 1/2 rhythm. Having the Hard completely familiar with 1/3 rhythm would cause an inconsistency with the spread since Mell is the difficulty with all the 1/3 rhythm.
  6. 01:43:831 (5,6) - you usually don't go for high spacing between two similar weak sounds, why use it here? It's so the player can identify each section of the song. Since the song abruptly goes quiet, I wanted to help that transition with the map too.
  7. 01:50:518 (3,1) - minimal overlap, can be fixed i guess
  8. 01:57:747 (2,3) - definitely not interesting to have in such a calm part
I wanted the ending to be a little "different" with the map,
since the ending is in a pretty minor key.


last
  1. 00:31:542 (1) - hmm would be better to go till the red tick as the sound doesn't really ends on the white one There's a little gimmick here that I used. The higher the SV is, the shorter the slider is.
  2. 00:51:060 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - visuals could be improved, i can't really see a clear patterning between these, adjusting 00:51:783 (5,6) - would be pretty nice Would a Ctrl + G be good?
  3. 00:51:783 (5,6,1) - flow here plays a bit off than usual, when you compare with parts like 00:40:759 (4,5) - 00:47:626 (3,1) - 00:56:120 (3,1) - that use a clear and common flow this one is receiving a counter one to receive an unecessary emphasis ^
  4. 01:15:277 (1,2) - seems non-fitting, nothing important can be found on 01:15:457 - to cause the 1/2 jump reasonable. I'd prefer to keep an extended slider here to fit violin sound 01:15:518 - as used on 01:16:000 (1,2) - as an example
  5. 01:17:807 (4) - really going to follow background sound? ending as 1/3 would be nice since u were following violin earlier Ending the slider at 1/3 just makes the map really odd.
  6. 01:49:072 (4,1,2) - maybe use kick sliders for these too, ignoring violin sound here isn't cool, using only on 01:49:614 (3,4) - also seems weird It's increasing in texture as the violin gets more intense.


Adjust volume settings on Normal diff


Thanks, no mention = fixed
posted
Hi I saw this on #modreqs and thought it was pretty cool

01:35:518 - some diffs have a break here and some don't so can you make it consistent
the finishes at the end like 01:49:975 - seem a bit much, maybe use a softer finish or be more sparing with your whistles and use them only on more important sounds (like where your finishes were?)

[Easy]
- 00:12:024 (1) - slider shapes like this are pretty ambiguous for newer players, i'd recommend making these more straightforward like 00:09:855 (1) - or 00:06:602 (2) - . Applies to areas all over the diff like 00:59:735 (1) -
- 00:45:638 (3,1) - these are 1 pixel off of being parallel xD
- 00:48:891 (1) - you can equalize this slider more

[Normal]
- 00:19:614 (5,1) - considering the distance between your objects this is a bit too close imo :?
- 00:34:795 (3) - slightly off-kilter ;-;
- 00:35:879 (1) - probably too complicated a shape since the end is in a weird spot, maybe simplify it a bit?
- 00:38:048 (1) - ^ definitely a nono, this one // 00:57:566 (1) - 01:04:072 (1) - etc
- 01:05:156 (2) - probably fits better as a curved slider since violins are cute and curvy
- 01:57:204 (3) - also ambiguous shape

[Hard]
- 00:25:307 (2,3) - a bit surprising for a 1/4 gap cuz you introduced like, 1/1 gaps on slider heads so this was unexpected. plus you use 01:39:765 (5,1) - and so on so.. yeah
- 01:15:638 (3,4,5) - spacing looks massively uneven try this http://i.imgur.com/JZkn1rE.png
- 01:21:060 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - you have this rhythm but then why do you make so many clickables 01:24:494 (2,3,4,5) - here? music is almost the same :?
- 01:49:253 (3) - maybe 1/4 reverse here for violin?

[Mell]
what does the name mean o.O

-00:09:855 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4) - this felt way too high spacing and intensity since even the kiai doesn't really reach this level of spacing and density, i think it deserves a nerf :?
- 00:49:434 (4,5) - if you're gonna emphasize the kick here you should do it 00:49:072 (2,3) - here as well
- 01:15:638 (2) - for high violin like this and 01:17:445 (3) - it'd be cool to have circles instead of reverses
- 01:23:048 (4,1,2) - there's a stream possibility here if i'm not deaf that might make this jump section more interesting?
- 01:49:072 - 1/4 starts here so maybe 1/4 sliders starting from here similar to 01:49:614 (3,4) - ?

I really really like the topdiff. Call me back when you've replied.
Please sign in to reply.