1. Easy (1.53 stars, 297 notes)
2. Hard (3.21 stars, 621 notes)
3. Insane (3.94 stars, 763 notes)
4. Normal (2.18 stars, 453 notes)

1. 00:10:773 (6,7) - while I understand you wanna emphasize (7) due to the finish sound, the spacing change seemed a bit excessive here if you put it into context with 00:10:773 (6) - 's low sv and your previous 1/2 jumps. It's a bit too sudden imo, the emphasis can be kept easily even when lowering the spacing a bit
   
2. 00:12:085 (2,3,4) - i think a pattern like this suits the rhythm better https://voli.s-ul.eu/6pDeMTX4.png
   
3. 00:33:648 (1,2,1) - It's more suitable to do something like this https://voli.s-ul.eu/BjH4uWbE.png to illustrate the emphasis on 00:36:648 (1) - better. Your pattern as of now would make me think that the most important sound is on 00:36:460 (2) -
   
4. 00:54:460 (4,1) - same as above basically, running out of space here isn't a really a good excuse to not give proper spacing emphasis to 00:54:648 (1) - what about this? https://voli.s-ul.eu/bI1SR1cZ.png (you did it properly here 01:16:960 (10,1) - )
   
5. 01:04:398 (5,6) - what if you lowered the slider velocity of these sliders by a bunch? it'd give way more power to these sliders afterwards 01:05:148 (1,2) - , when all the background music kicks in and stuff, rn your sv is the same making 01:05:148 (1,2) - feel very underwhelming as a result (i recommend lowering the spacing on 01:04:398 (5,6) - a bit aswell)
   
6. 01:17:148 (1) - i feel like the stronger vocal + drum sound at the end of this slider should have a clickable object, perhaps split this up in 2 sliders
   
7. 01:20:710 (2,3) - why are they stacked? o.o thats weird
   
8. 01:25:585 (10,11,12) - just space them the same, the pitch height (which i assume thats what you're going for) is exactly the same so theres no need to space 01:25:960 (12) - further than the rest
   
9. 01:29:523 (2) - it's up to you, but i'd put a note on the white tick and a slider on the red tick instead of this, the reason is that you captured the first piano sound well with this slider 01:28:960 (1) - but the second one goes ignored here which, to me, could be better
   
10. 01:29:898 (3) - if you applied the above, make this one follow the piano properly aswell
    
11. 01:44:148 (1,2) - these feel a bit too close, i get that you wanted to stack the sliderend, but perhaps stack it on 01:43:773 (6) - instead so theyre not so clumped in a corner together
    
12. 01:58:585 (7,8,9) - there should be more distance between 8 and 9 as they're both strong claps and you spaced 7 and 8 very widely
    
13. 02:10:960 (4,1) - same as i said for similar pattern before, as you escalated the spacing, having 02:11:148 (1) - be spaced lower doesnt work too well
    
14. 02:20:523 (3) - I think the repeat is unnecessary, there's only two percussion beats not three
    
15. 02:41:335 (9,10) - Move them a bit further apart mayb visuals
    
16. 02:45:835 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - wh why are they so LOW SPACED make them proper jumps? \o/ this buildup sounds pretty intense
    
17. 02:51:648 (1,2,3) - https://voli.s-ul.eu/hKnBpvk8.png would be better here imo to emphasize 02:52:210 (3) - correctly
    
18. 03:39:085 (8,9,10,1) - cool
    
19. 03:54:273 (13) - Maybe a slider from white to blue tick would work well here because of the whoooosh sound (whatever instrument that is), perhaps a round, flowing shape would do well https://voli.s-ul.eu/NYGpEYID.png just an idea tho

Voli wrote:

[Insane]

1. 00:10:773 (6,7) - while I understand you wanna emphasize (7) due to the finish sound, the spacing change seemed a bit excessive here if you put it into context with 00:10:773 (6) - 's low sv and your previous 1/2 jumps. It's a bit too sudden imo, the emphasis can be kept easily even when lowering the spacing a bit its not excessive
   
2. 00:12:085 (2,3,4) - i think a pattern like this suits the rhythm better https://voli.s-ul.eu/6pDeMTX4.png maybe, though there is a progression to this part, so I made that clear through my rhythm
   
3. 00:33:648 (1,2,1) - It's more suitable to do something like this https://voli.s-ul.eu/BjH4uWbE.png to illustrate the emphasis on 00:36:648 (1) - better. Your pattern as of now would make me think that the most important sound is on 00:36:460 (2) - I've tried this, though there is a sound on 00:36:460 (2) - louder than the cymbal hit.
   
4. 00:54:460 (4,1) - same as above basically, running out of space here isn't a really a good excuse to not give proper spacing emphasis to 00:54:648 (1) - what about this? https://voli.s-ul.eu/bI1SR1cZ.png (you did it properly here 01:16:960 (10,1) - ) never ran out of space here. 1 has emphasis because the movement changes from going down/left, to up then right
   
5. 01:04:398 (5,6) - what if you lowered the slider velocity of these sliders by a bunch? it'd give way more power to these sliders afterwards 01:05:148 (1,2) - , when all the background music kicks in and stuff, rn your sv is the same making 01:05:148 (1,2) - feel very underwhelming as a result (i recommend lowering the spacing on 01:04:398 (5,6) - a bit aswell) why lower them, there are strong vocals here I want to emphasize, lowering sv would weaken that.
   
6. 01:17:148 (1) - i feel like the stronger vocal + drum sound at the end of this slider should have a clickable object, perhaps split this up in 2 sliders long vocal hold is why 1/1, also I put strong sounds to slider ends all over the map. so this one is not out of place .
   
7. 01:20:710 (2,3) - why are they stacked? o.o thats weird its roughly the same sound as the slider that was just passed
   
8. 01:25:585 (10,11,12) - just space them the same, the pitch height (which i assume thats what you're going for) is exactly the same so theres no need to space 01:25:960 (12) - further than the rest nobody will notice pitch to height, its spacing to pitch.
   
9. 01:29:523 (2) - it's up to you, but i'd put a note on the white tick and a slider on the red tick instead of this, the reason is that you captured the first piano sound well with this slider 01:28:960 (1) - but the second one goes ignored here which, to me, could be better the drum sounds are to the slider heads
   
10. 01:29:898 (3) - if you applied the above, make this one follow the piano properly aswell
    
11. 01:44:148 (1,2) - these feel a bit too close, i get that you wanted to stack the sliderend, but perhaps stack it on 01:43:773 (6) - instead so theyre not so clumped in a corner together it looks fine when I look at it.
    
12. 01:58:585 (7,8,9) - there should be more distance between 8 and 9 as they're both strong claps and you spaced 7 and 8 very widely rhythm is now changed.
    
13. 02:10:960 (4,1) - same as i said for similar pattern before, as you escalated the spacing, having 02:11:148 (1) - be spaced lower doesnt work too well maybe in your mind, though not mine. explained prior
    
14. 02:20:523 (3) - I think the repeat is unnecessary, there's only two percussion beats not three fixed
    
15. 02:41:335 (9,10) - Move them a bit further apart mayb visuals looks fine to me.
    
16. 02:45:835 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - wh why are they so LOW SPACED make them proper jumps? \o/ this buildup sounds pretty intense NO THANKS
    
17. 02:51:648 (1,2,3) - https://voli.s-ul.eu/hKnBpvk8.png would be better here imo to emphasize 02:52:210 (3) - correctly it's already emphasized correctly as explained prior prior
    
18. 03:39:085 (8,9,10,1) - cool
    
19. 03:54:273 (13) - Maybe a slider from white to blue tick would work well here because of the whoooosh sound (whatever instrument that is), perhaps a round, flowing shape would do well https://voli.s-ul.eu/NYGpEYID.png just an idea tho no

Okbai

PeterEU wrote:

Normal
00:25:585 (3,4,5) and 01:06:273 (2,3,4,5) and 01:57:273 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - a bit too confusing to read for normal
00:54:273 (5,6) - make stack consistent with rest 01:18:273 (2,3,4) and 01:13:023 (6,7,8)

Hard
00:39:648 (10) and 03:57:648 (9) and 04:00:835 (17) and 04:03:648 (25) - Should be NC Third Downbeat no
01:40:210 (3,1) - stack these ok

Insane
Turn off countdown

Dashyy- wrote:

hm

normal:
spinner end is unsnapped i think
00:25:585 (3,4,5) - don't think it's a good idea to have this in the lowest diff of set lol. scrubs aren't used to stacks yet and probably can;t even read 5, so i wouldm suggest making a clearer path to 5, maybe something like [ur=https://gyazo.com/bd3315f8d2c63ec7636956d8818fbec1l]this [/url
00:31:585 (3,4,5) - if ur follolwing vocals i think [url=00:31:585 (3,4,5) -]this[/url] rhythm would work better cuz ur current rhythm skips over high pitched vocal on red tick
00:51:648 (1,3) - 3 is visable before 1 is gone, so players might have a hard time reading this pattern becuase of it. maybe do something like this to indicate a clearer pattern?
01:06:460 (3,5) - like 00:25:585 (3,4,5) -, making clear patterns in a low diff is a must have for scrubs to be able to read those patterns. moiving 5 slightly up would even be better as it shows the player that 5 is the next object
01:18:273 (2,3,4) - maybe use the same rhythm as 01:06:273 (2,3,4) - ? latter rhythm compliements the vocals better, which you seem to be following

there's a lot of other stacks in the diff (02:11:898 (3,5) - and 02:03:085 (3,5,6) - just to name a few) that suffwer the same problem as 00:25:585 (3,4,5) - and 01:06:460 (3,5) . go through them and try to make clearer paths for the objects.

hard:
00:11:335 (8) - nc this since this is the same ds as the triple before it (00:10:773 (5,6,7) - ), so i feel like it would be better to differentiate the spacing between them i change nc differently
00:17:523 (5,6) - why isn't spacing consistent with 00:14:523 (7,8) - (and don't tell me u have no room that's not an excuse mister) aaa
00:39:648 (10) - shouldn't this be nced cuz u did it here 00:45:648 (1) - no crash cymbal
01:10:023 (7) - clap pls ok

insane:
disable countdown yeeee

too big brain for me

PeterEU wrote:

Normal
00:25:585 (3,4,5) and 01:06:273 (2,3,4,5) and 01:57:273 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - a bit too confusing to read for normal Will be fixed.
00:54:273 (5,6) - make stack consistent with rest 01:18:273 (2,3,4) and 01:13:023 (6,7,8) Will be fixed.

Dashyy- wrote:

hm

normal:
spinner end is unsnapped i think
00:25:585 (3,4,5) - don't think it's a good idea to have this in the lowest diff of set lol. scrubs aren't used to stacks yet and probably can;t even read 5, so i wouldm suggest making a clearer path to 5, maybe something like [ur=https://gyazo.com/bd3315f8d2c63ec7636956d8818fbec1l]this [/url Will be fixed.
00:31:585 (3,4,5) - if ur follolwing vocals i think [url=00:31:585 (3,4,5) -]this[/url] rhythm would work better cuz ur current rhythm skips over high pitched vocal on red tick Will be fixed.
00:51:648 (1,3) - 3 is visable before 1 is gone, so players might have a hard time reading this pattern becuase of it. maybe do something like this to indicate a clearer pattern? Will be fixed.
01:06:460 (3,5) - like 00:25:585 (3,4,5) -, making clear patterns in a low diff is a must have for scrubs to be able to read those patterns. moiving 5 slightly up would even be better as it shows the player that 5 is the next object Sure
01:18:273 (2,3,4) - maybe use the same rhythm as 01:06:273 (2,3,4) - ? latter rhythm compliements the vocals better, which you seem to be following Applied.

there's a lot of other stacks in the diff (02:11:898 (3,5) - and 02:03:085 (3,5,6) - just to name a few) that suffwer the same problem as 00:25:585 (3,4,5) - and 01:06:460 (3,5) . go through them and try to make clearer paths for the objects. Will be fixed in the remap.


too big brain for me

hypercyte wrote:

hm


normal:

04:06:835 (1) - id end spinner on the white tick, since that's where it sounds like it should finish tbh (adjust the green line too) Done

00:24:648 (1) - id probably add a finish here too but it's not as strong as the others so i'll leave this one to you (maybe lower volume finish) Hitsounds will be copied from final diff.

00:47:523 (4) - add finish Hitsounds will be copied from final diff.

00:59:898 (2) - add finish on second slider reverse? Hitsounds will be copied from final diff.

I also have to delete a lot of green lines.

too big brain for me

Halfslashed wrote:

[Hard]
00:39:648 (10) - Add NC. this is copied fr omthe top difficulty, where the nc in this section is to help show the progression on the cymbals, so i will add nc at 00:47:523 -
04:00:835 (17) - Nice reference but I don't find it as fitting as in the other map due to your rhythms, but this works a lot better in the top difficulty. A less extreme way to handle the fadeout representation via NC would be NCing this object, since you typically stick to a NC per two measures rule, and ending with NCing every 4 measures would work well. .

Call me back when you're ready.