1. Advanced (2,25 stars, 216 notes)
2. Arrival's Muzukashii (3,08 stars, 527 notes)
3. Arrival's Oni (4,33 stars, 776 notes)
4. Hard (3,29 stars, 302 notes)
5. Hyper (4,25 stars, 364 notes)
6. Kyuukai's Basic (1,65 stars, 151 notes)
7. Realinada's Another (5,27 stars, 495 notes)
8. Standard (1,86 stars, 170 notes)

scrapped diffs

Extra
Nowhere's Another

1. 00:06:571 (1,2,3) - et si tu polissais le blanket un petit peu plus?
2. 00:38:903 (3) - à ce point, je crois que tu peux y mettre un nouveau combo pour suivre la consistance et puis, puisque c'est un long slider et que par ailleurs le dernier slider se trouve à être long, tu allonges ton combo un peu trop. tu pourrais aussi faire la même chose @00:43:877 (3) -
3. 01:36:416 - je trouve qu'il y a un espace malaisant ici, il semble manquer quelque chose pour suivre la musique et les autres objets. je te suggère de prendre 01:36:727 (1) - et de le bouger à 01:36:416 - en gardant son reverse et bouger le prochain slider à 01:37:659 -. Par la suite, avec ton deuxième slider, met un Whistle+Clap au début du slider et un clap à la fin.
   Avant
   
   Après
   

1. 00:31:461 (1) - Je ne te conseil pas de mettre ton spinner à cet endroit. Malgré que ça semble correcte côté STD/Taiko/CtB, ça ne l'ai pas du côté du mania. Je te suggère fortement de déplacer ton spinner à 00:31:519 -
2. 01:13:721 (1,2) - allez, je suis sur que tu es capable de faire un meilleur blanket. (01:35:483 (7,1) - ) ici aussi hen :3

1. 00:24:602 (4,5,6,7,8) - tu pourrais essayer de mettre ces cercles un peu plus alignés?
2. 01:39:680 (4) - je ne sais pas qu'est-ce que tu en penserais, mais je trouve que tu pourrais y ajouter un nouveau combo. ça va faire quelque chose de semblable à 01:29:887 (1) -

1. 00:22:108 (2) - Le clap est de trop, supprime-le
2. 00:21:487 (8) - Ajoute un nouveau combo pour ensuite supprimer le combo de la prochaine note. Il faut rester consistant.
3. 00:22:730 (5) - Ajoute un nouveau combo, même raison que ^
4. 00:33:918 (5) - Si tu veux faire la même chose que tu as fait pour 00:38:269 (1) - , je te suggère aussi de mettre un nouveau combo.
5. 00:47:437 (1) - Supprime le combo pour suivre les deux derniers combos

Gabe wrote:

Ekoro's std

1. 00:06:571 (1,2,3) - et si tu polissais le blanket un petit peu plus? j'crois que c'est bon
2. 00:38:903 (3) - à ce point, je crois que tu peux y mettre un nouveau combo pour suivre la consistance et puis, puisque c'est un long slider et que par ailleurs le dernier slider se trouve à être long, tu allonges ton combo un peu trop. tu pourrais aussi faire la même chose @00:43:877 (3) - ye
3. 01:36:416 - je trouve qu'il y a un espace malaisant ici, il semble manquer quelque chose pour suivre la musique et les autres objets. je te suggère de prendre 01:36:727 (1) - et de le bouger à 01:36:416 - en gardant son reverse et bouger le prochain slider à 01:37:659 -. Par la suite, avec ton deuxième slider, met un Whistle+Clap au début du slider et un clap à la fin. j'ai juste ajouté un cercle en fait kek
   Avant
   
   Après
   

J'adore la difficulté, gg.

FailureAtOsu wrote:

m4m

Standard

not sure how i feel about all these rhythms and the claps in sliders. it's really, really weird to watch and really really weird sounding.

Advanced

00:03:773 (7,8,1) - the slider on 1 makes this look extremely bad. maybe make the slider straight? kept the slider shape but rotated it a bit and played around with its placement
00:08:747 (6) - i understand the pitch is lower, but why is this a slider in comparison to 00:06:260 (6,7) - ? maybe just make it a smaller jump? aite
01:07:970 (6,1) - HNNG THIS OVERLAP sorry dad
01:27:245 (4,5) - blanket? yes
01:34:706 (4,5,6) - why is this stacked? nothing else is in terms of 1/1.. changed the pattern

Hyper

00:02:685 (5) - why do you choose to do these awful sliders? something like http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6559884 would look so so much better in every way. they look fine to me
00:12:633 (4) - this slider is very jarring. it doesn't really connect with anything. maybe have it point towards the end of 3? somewhat fixed
00:40:457 (2,1) - blanket? yes
01:34:706 (4,5,6) - why 1/1 circle and not 1/2 slider like everything else? idk changed
01:41:545 (2,3,4,5,2,3,4) - same music, different rhythms. why? ^

Another

00:21:804 (2,4) - this looks like trash. make em blanket?
00:30:820 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this is 1/3
00:37:193 (4,5,1) - i don't see why these sliders have nothing to do with eachother? copy paste 4 on 5 then make em blanket, then make 1 blanket 5. like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6559948 but not so messy (i did it fast)
01:05:172 (1,2,3) - same, except it's mostly just 2,3 not having anything to do with eachother
00:40:146 (1,2,3,4) - i don't see the justification for this MASSIVE spike in spacing.
01:04:550 (4,5,6) - what the heck?
01:34:395 (4,1) - annoying overlap

fixed everything

Extra

this diff seems really random and un-coordinated. stupid overlaps like 00:20:716 (4,1) - really really hurt everything. 00:33:462 (5,1) - you can blanket this, that'd look nice. Stuff like that. It's everywhere. It'd take me forever to point it all out.
01:05:949 (8,3) - Another example of a bad overlap
also, structure is just not there. Nothing combined looks good. I wish I could explain this better q_q

dunno what you mean by it but I tried to fix most dirty overlaps as well as I could, you're probably looking at some patterns differently than how I supposed them to be but oh well

Good luck! Interesting style

Toshino Kyoko wrote:

Hi Hi ! :3
M4M

Extra

- 00:32:685 - 00:32:996 - 00:35:172 - 00:35:483 - 00:35:794 - 00:37:659 - 00:37:970 - 01:05:017 - 01:07:504 - 01:09:991 - 01:12:478 - 01:14:965 - 01:17:452 - 01:26:157 - 01:36:105 - 01:47:607 - 01:47:918 - Il y a des percussions et des sons que tu ne devrais pas ignorer pour le bien du rythme je fais exprès de les ignorer pour rajouter un peu de contraste dans la map histoire que ça soit pas tout le temps la même chose
- 01:07:970 (3,4,5,6,7) - Ce stream est bizarre et fait tache dans le reste de la map bien vu

Nowhere's Another

- 00:00:975 (5,6,7) - Triplet pas beau pas compris?
- 00:02:530 - 00:03:462 - 00:08:436 - 00:10:923 - 00:13:410 - 00:15:898 - 00:18:074 - 00:18:385 - 00:19:784 - 00:22:581 - 00:23:359 - 00:28:022 - 00:28:333 - 00:37:970 - 00:45:742 - 00:48:229 - 01:02:530 - 01:03:618 - 01:04:550 (4,5,6) - 01:07:504 - 01:08:436 - 01:09:991 - 01:10:923 - 01:13:410 - 01:14:965 - 01:16:053 - 01:17:452 - 01:18:540 - 01:32:685 - Tu ne devrais pas ignorer la plupart des percussions présentent ces endroits pareil qu'en Extra sauf qu'en plus de ça la difficulté est supposée être moins dure
- 01:04:550 (4,5,6) - Triplet mal stacker bien vu

Hyper

- 00:03:462 - 00:05:017 - 00:08:436 - 00:10:302 - 00:10:923 - 00:13:100 - 00:15:587 - 00:18:074 - 00:20:872 - 00:23:670 - 00:25:846 - 00:28:022 - 00:31:338 (1) - 00:31:338 (1) - 00:31:338 (1) - 01:03:151 - 01:03:462 - 01:05:017 - 01:05:638 - 01:07:504 - 01:08:126 - 01:08:436 - 01:09:991 - 01:10:613 - 01:10:923 - 01:12:478 - 01:13:100 - 01:13:410 - 01:14:965 - 01:15:587 - 01:15:898 - 01:15:898 - 01:17:452 - 01:18:074 - 01:18:385 - 01:32:685 - 01:35:172 - 01:40:146 - 01:42:633 - 01:45:120 - 01:47:607 - N'ignore pas la plupart de ces percussions, même si tu priotarise la voix ou un autre instrument, il y a des sons que tu ne peux pas ignorer comme la caisse claire de la batterie pareil qu'en Extra sauf qu'en plus de ça la difficulté est supposée être encore moins dure que l'Another
- 00:31:338 (1) - Ce circle n'est pas sur un tic, met le sur le tic bleu juste après c'est du 1/3 donc si il est sur un tick

L'une des remarques que je dois faire c'est le fait que tu ignore certains sons alors qu'il ne devrait pas être, ce n'est pas un problème pour les diff les plus basses mais ca risque de l'être pour les plus grandes diff.
Voila j'espère que ca t'aurai aider ! :3

Lilyanna wrote:

Hi from my queue

General :

disable countdown done
disable widescreen support ^

Standard :

00:07:504 (2,3) - can improve this side of blanket
00:09:058 (1,1) - isnt it the recovery time is tooo low and unrankable since this the lowes difficulty
00:28:799 (1,2) - stacking a note on the arrow signe is also unrankable also this only stack u do here like this it doesnt look apealing
01:07:037 (2) - small but , can fix ds
01:13:721 (1) - ^

advanced :

00:10:768 (6,7) - this looks and playes wierd why not dont skip this beat 00:10:923 - and do this rythm adding a triple here 00:11:079 - http://puu.sh/smMin/457c24ceb9.jpg added a note instead of repeating the slider
00:30:198 (5,6,7) - i dont think stacking them is good idea it cant read it when the arrow is hidden under imo unstacked them but im not sure about its playability
00:31:442 (9) - nc ok
00:51:338 - it would be better if u make this note clickable true

Hyper :

00:33:929 (1) - i dont think u need to nc here since u nc on every 2 downbeats good catch, wasn't intentional
ok now u nc on every one downbeat be consistent about it either one or two uhh yeah they were mostly intentional, should be fixed
00:51:338 (5) - nc why not

cant mod higher i hope i helped good luck!

FailureAtOsu wrote:

m4m

Standard

not sure how i feel about all these rhythms and the claps in sliders. it's really, really weird to watch and really really weird sounding.

Lilyanna wrote:

Hi from my queue

Standard :

00:07:504 (2,3) - can improve this side of blanket done
00:09:058 (1,1) - isnt it the recovery time is tooo low and unrankable since this the lowes difficulty i actually have no idea here... i'll keep it since it sounds okay, i may make it finish 1/1 earlier if it's really not good
00:28:799 (1,2) - stacking a note on the arrow signe is also unrankable also this only stack u do here like this it doesnt look apealing uh, changed
01:07:037 (2) - small but , can fix ds done
01:13:721 (1) - ^ i actually don't get what's wrong here

Ekoro wrote:

this is a very old map i made, i am still really lazy to fully remap it and Real doesn't want to remove it either
so eh.... rip shit old map

Saturnalize wrote:

I think I've seen the "Nowhere" diff somewhere : t/151995
You copied almost everything oh my god

Unless you have permission from the original mapper ( https://osu.ppy.sh/u/659028 for Nowhere, https://osu.ppy.sh/u/2530784 for Morray ) to put their diffs here OR you are Morray (which I assume, you are), this will counted as plagiarism and this map won't go anywhere, I'm afraid.

And yes, I have both maps. Almost every Une mage blanche map. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6625355

edit: 700th post.

SPOILER

I'm wasting my milestone and your second page's first post. Everyone cares!

OR you are Morray (which I assume, you are)

Hobbes2 wrote:

M4m from my queue

[Advanced]

Well I don't think the gap between Standard and this diff (which you might as well call Hard) is okay in terms of mapset surve, ignoring the SR this diff is way denser and a lot faster. dunno it doesn't seem that huge of a gap, i'll get more opinions on it. however i did remove every 1/4 in the diff

00:03:773 (7,8,1) - This kinda thing doesn't really play well because of the super wide angle and large spacing, relative to the difficulty level. fixed

00:11:545 (1,2,3) - For one, these blankets aren't perfect, and another problem is that they're not the same. Ideally you'd fix one of the sliders and then just copy paste that pattern and rotate it to get the other shape. Gives its a symmetrical feel and looks much better. can't believe i let that through

00:17:141 (3,4) - Here you perfect stack them but there's a 1/2 gap, but 00:20:716 (7,8) - here you stack but its a 1/4 gap. I know the stacks are different but the map's so fast that it could throw the players reading off. removed 1/4s so fixed I guess?

00:22:736 (5,6) - This triplet doesn't make sense, there's no sounds there so its pretty much overmapping. It doesn't fit for emphasis either, otherwise it would be on 00:22:581 - and 00:22:659 - f^

00:30:820 (7) - The sound here is 1/3 not 1/4 mistake, fixed

00:43:877 (1,3,4) - Use softer curves so they dont overlap maybe played around with their positions

00:47:452 (3,5) - fix stack fixed i think

01:13:721 (1,2) - Fix the blanket here lol ^

Neat diff in general, has good structure. I disagree with the existence of some of those single tap portions, they use large wide angles (the pentagons) and are rather hard to play for a hard diff. thanks!

[Hyper]

00:05:794 (5,1) - Looks nicer if you overlap the tail of 5 with 1's sliderbody i swear i thought they were overlapping

00:12:944 (5) and 00:15:276 (6) - I get that these big reverse sliders are for the vocals but theyr'e just so underwhelming. There's a lot going on in the music and it's just skipped for these giant sliders. filled it a bit more

00:18:695 - And these 1/1 gaps dont make a lot of sense either. Why skip this clap for example? because im stupid

00:22:737 (7) - NC, and this triplet is overmapped. added NC but I think the triple fits

00:26:467 (1,2,3) - Same thing I mentioned in the hard about equal blankets. First fix one then rotate it to get the other shape. can't believe i let those through either

00:31:338 (1,2) - There's literally no way for the player to know this is gonna be 1/3 from the stack itself, so I suggest making 00:31:131 - the head of a slider that ends on 00:31:338 (1) - sounds great

00:32:996 - I feel this should be mapped, strong sound on the melody here indeed

00:45:898 (8,9,10,11,12,13) - Extremely messy stream, has wildly varying DS. Clean it up fixed

00:48:851 (1) - Different spacing on this note of the stream, looks weird ^

01:14:654 (4,5) - blanket ^

01:29:887 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - This one jump section increases the SR by about .2 lol made it smaller

[nowhere]

00:01:131 (7) - wouldnt it make more sense if this is a continuation of the stream? doesnt make sense a a slider indeed

00:02:685 (5) - should get the NC ^

00:10:613 (1) - huge jump here, which makes 00:10:146 (5,6,1,2) - play kinda awkwardly when the music doesnt really justify that somewhat fixed

00:22:737 (1,2) - This spacing is much smaller than usual mistake

00:30:198 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Kind of an ugly stream, looks hand placed? I recommend using slider->stream looks much better. this diff was done before slider to stream was a thing, changed it though

00:36:416 (1,4) - stack perhaps? okay

00:37:970 - strong sound in the melody, weird to skip it. true

00:39:524 (3,1) - not a fan of this overlap. me neither

00:40:923 (6,7,8,9,10,11) - again, not a good stream, you should use slider->stream fixed

00:49:473 (5) - NC? The huge SV change is unreadable otherwise. okay

01:15:276 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - weird flow indeed

01:25:690 (4,5,6) - awkward to play because of the big spacing change combined with the wide angle changed

a lot of these streams in the final part could be cleaned up a bit, again I suggest using slider-stream for neater streams. tried to make them neater

Good luck!

Hobbes2 wrote:

[Ekoro]

I know it's called standard but since it's the easiest diff in the set I'm treating it like an Easy. And you shouldn't, i think it's more of a Normal diff (there's even some 1/2), almost reaching 2 stars. The map would be much easier if it was really an Easy diff.

00:00:354 (1,2,3,4) - Well it's the earliest diff in the set so it's supposed to be accessible by beginners, i dont think starting things off with two stacks is a good idea. why not? it's not too hard

00:09:058 (1,1) - Easies need at least 4 beats of recovery after a spinner, so this is unrankable. excuse me but when was this ever introduced? 4/1 really seems too big. Asked some about this "thing", and i only shortened 00:31:442 (1) by 1 beat.

00:18:229 (4) - Hm, this could be a slider that extends to 00:18:695, this way it maps the vocal and the clap. fixed

00:23:980 (1) - New players can't properly read 1/1 double reverse sliders, especially at this BPM. I don't know how unrankable it is (I'm pretty sure it is), but I highly suggest changing this. There isn't any other circles around and the map mostly keeps a rhythm (almost no "empty" moments), it shouldn't be hard for them.
00:28:955 (2) - ^ ^

00:28:799 (1) - NC should be on 00:28:955 (2) - maybe, i wanted to separate it from the other patterns though, will think about it

00:31:442 (1,1) - Spinners need at least 4 beats of recovery time in Easy diffs same as above, however i only fixed this spinner
00:33:929 (1,1) - ^ ^

00:48:851 (1) - This doesn't belong in an Easy. New players won't have any idea how to read this. this is a Normal though. they just have to hold the slider for a moment, it follows the song lol

01:08:747 (1,1) - 4 beats of recovery nope

01:14:809 (2) - no double reverse 1/1 slider nah, follows the song and i don't think that's a problem anyway

01:25:379 (3) - Yeah.. and two sliders/four circles would be a better solution? lol
01:35:483 (3) - ^ ^

In general this dif is pretty alright (SV is a bit high imo but its probably fine) other than the unrankable stuff. Fortunate they're all easily fixable so it's no big deal.

00:48:851 (1) - This doesn't belong in an Easy. New players won't have any idea how to read this. this is a Normal though. they just have to hold the slider for a moment, it follows the song lol

- Frontier - wrote:

why don't you have some cutie bg? don't see what's wrong with the current one?

[Gereral]

1. Tick "Enable Countdown" off in Ekoro and Nowhere's Diff i'll let ekoro take care of this on his diff, fixed on nowhere
2. Tick "Letterbox During Breaks" off in Ekoro and Nowhere's Diff ^
3. Source : "REFLEC BEAT limelight"^

[Advanced]

1. 00:08:747 (6,7,8) - This part is as same as 00:03:773 (7,8,1) - but you mapped differently. it's actually weaker, hence the smaller spacing
2. 00:20:716 (7) - oh shit LOL fixed
3. 00:31:286 (8) - maybe move to 00:31:338 changed the pattern according to hobbes2's suggestion, fits better imo
4. 00:33:618 (3) - consider using nc here to make the player understand that it's different from 00:32:996 (1,2)changed the pattern but I don't think a NC is necessary for a 1/2

[Hyper]

1. 00:08:747 (4,5) - This part is as same as 00:03:773 (8,9,1) - but you mapped differently. same as Advanced
2. 00:45:431 (6) - maybe ctrl+g this don't really see the point
3. 01:39:680 (4) - consider using nc here to make the player understand that it's differentthe music stays the same, it's not useful to put a new combo here and might even confuse players

This is fun.
GL

LGV894 wrote:

lul I forgot mod

ew I really hate this set no need to remind everyone that you hate it every post you make tho

Hyper

- 00:02:374 (4,5) - Okay, so first of all, why the fk? What did you do to these sliders? Just click, click and right click. It would've looked a ton better. 00:13:255 (7) - Just like what you did here. just noticed the sliders have weird shapes because this map was made before the change to sliders, fixed
- 00:09:214 - This is better off as a hitcircle. 00:09:369 - Move the 1/2 slider here. sounds ok
- 00:13:721 - Missed a vital beat. ^
- 00:23:514 - imo 1/2 slider would be more fitting here. ^
- 00:25:690 (9,1) - I don't understand the sudden use of overlap when the previous patterns were clearly not overlapped. fixed
- 00:42:944 - 00:42:478 (5,7) - Overlapping. Go to View (at the top left of the screen) > Stacking and check the option to see it. As much as possible, avoid overlaps like this one. If you plan to make an overlap pattern, make sure that it would cover at least 70% of the object above / below it. ^
- 01:09:214 (2,3,4,5,6) - Why the sudden difficulty burst? Not really much of an issue gameplay-wise, but BN-wise... idk. lowered a bit
- 01:19:939 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Isn't this a bit excessive considering the difficulty throughout the map? Try using 3 circles and 1 repeat slider for every 8 beats. It would match the difficulty better. 01:20:872 - You could use 2 1/4 sliders here. i think this is currently fine, if i get more complaints about it i'll change it to something easier
- 01:21:960 (3,4) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6687119 ok
- 01:23:514 (9,1) - Increase DS. This object must be emphasized. Also try sharp-angle flow. ^
- 01:30:974 (2,1) - DS is too low. This should be far more emphasized than the octagon. oops
- 01:42:167 (6) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6687128 flow or DS change to emphasize (?) i don't think this needs emphasis
- 01:44:654 (6) - You really do lack emphasis on important transitional parts. ^
- 01:48:540 (1,2,3,4,5) - DS too high. 2.0x is enough (actually still high but more fitting). This is just pp. Bad.actually they don't have any effect on the star rating so calling them pp jumps is a bit irrelevant here however since this isn't my highest difficulty anymore I lowered the spacing

Extra

- 00:00:354 (1,2,3,4) - Okay, so at Hyper, you mapped it as two moving objects, but here, you just mapped it as overlaps... That's not consistent nor fitting at all. Snare and kick sounds doesn't sound similar to be overlapped this way... Try a bit of repeat flow. done
- 00:00:509 (2,3) - You can Ctrl+G this. Just make sure to NC the new (2). doesn't seem necessary imo
-00:02:219 (4,5,6) - Weird flow. (4) points down, but the next object is above it, then the object after (5) is placed lower than it. It could've been not that bad, but those things were applied at small value, which just feel like little shakes to your cursor... Not comfortable to play at all. It doesn't fit the beat, too. (4) - (5) and (5) - (6) feels the same, which should not be. (6) should be emphasized even more due to a strong downbeat. consider that most players won't actually follow the slider body but rather go directly from its head to (5), which just makes it a sharp angle, the curve is solely for aesthetic purposes. also the wide angle isn't that much of an issue due to the spacing being relatively low
- 00:03:307 (8,2) - Blanket or change placing. It looks ew. changed the pattern a bit
- 00:05:638 (6,7) - Again with the emphasis issue. i don't see what's wrong?
- 00:08:747 (1,2,3) - These objects with small DS just threw consistency off. Make sure to make patterns consistent. This one sounds just like 00:03:773 (1,2,3) - yet you mapped it in a totally different way. they don't, they're much quieter and that's where the lowered spacing comes in
- 00:09:369 (2,4) - Overlap is ugly and unnecessary. they're not overlapping but I was planning on moving them a bit anyway
- 00:26:079 (6) - You should've used 2 hitcircles instead. This is just plain confusing for anybody who plays it for the first time. simply stacked it on the previous slider's tail
- 00:31:364 (1,2) - This is defenitely not a 1/4. It is a 1/3, just as you've mapped it in the Hyper difficulty. i swear it was 1/3 before
- I could go on for hours talking about flow, but this is only a quick check. The kiai was disappointing. It was blatantly just mapped at higher DS. The flow was a tad too uncomfortable with emphasis more than just a bit broken... the kiai wasn't actually just a "higher spaced" part but even if it was it'd make sense considering it's the most intense part of the song

I really don't like this set so I just modded 2 diffs (which actually took up a lot of time), although good luck with it. Hope you improve it a ton. The song isn't necessarily boring. The map plays okay, but it's not just always about playing okay, but also about relating the map to the music.opinions differ, i do think this map does a fairly decent job at following the music how i hear it, but it might just not appeal to everyone

- Frontier - wrote:

[Ekoro's Standard]

1. Standard is normal diff.
2. 00:09:058 (1,1) - Isn't the break between spinner and the next circle too short? uh i don't think so, it follows the music in the background so shortening it would be weird
3. 01:33:618 (1) - maybe ctrl+j this? http://puu.sh/swMXm/8e5c95a645.jpg eh, it was mostly to make it flow with the previous circle but this seems better (even if it doesn't really change a lot lol)
4. 01:38:592 (1,1) - Isn't the break between spinner and the next circle too short? same as above

Musty wrote:

Extra is perfect
my only concern is this note 00:13:721 (5) - that i would have placed elsewhere (either in the blanket or not)stacked it on top of (3) and did some slight patterning changes to make up for it

Osuology wrote:

[General]
Personally, I would really, REALLY recommend to rename Ekoro's diff to Ekoro's normal, advanced -> hard, and hyper -> insane. It just makes more sense to their star ratings. for now I think they' fit decently, however if it gets brought up again then I'll probably change them

[Advanced]
00:03:307 (6,7,8) - This spacing doesn't seem to have any reason behind it, and even if you claim that it is following the synth that starts playing here, you don't put these jumps later where the same occurrence happens (i.e 00:08:747 (6,7,8) - ) that sound is much stronger than the second one you linked, it makes more sense to emphasize it (pay attention to the hitsounds)

00:09:058 (8) - This should be new combo, since it's beginning of a new measure, and sliders should always start on a beat so that they sound right (unless they sound wrong while starting on a beat). Here they sound completely out of place because they start on red ticks. fair, changed it in other diffs aswell

00:31:519 (1) - If you're going to keep calling this diff advanced, forget about this one beat distance between the end of this spinner and the next hitcircle. what does the diff name have to do with that?

00:40:923 (3,4,5) - You can't just put things conveniently like this, unless we're talking Insane/Extra difficulty. And we're obviously not, so try to keep same DS. I can understand a jump between the 5 and the next combo, because the song provides a proper reason for that, but otherwise, I don't think these jumps are supported by the song at all. played with it a bit

00:50:094 (1) - This slider, first of all, is way too far from the next hitcircle. And not only that, but the end of this slider flows away from the next hitcircle, which gives added stress which really doesn't belong here. stacked (2) on 00:49:006 (2) -

01:16:675 (2,3) - Spacing is again too much between these two, please reduce for sake of aesthetic patterning. changed the pattern

01:19:939 (4,5,6,7) - This, I would say, is hard to read for a new player. Probably, even hard to read for me. Try making it such that they aren't stacked under each other. ^

01:30:820 (4) - Maybe try something more like this: okay i guess

01:37:037 (3) - Move to X:129 Y:116, more perfect blanky not really but I moved it anyway

01:48:540 (1,2,3,4,5) - WHOAWHOAWHOAWAHWOA hold on now wait a sec no stop. This is way, WAY too big for this difficulty. You can have jumps. But not this big, plus flow is hard to play. Overall, this probably bumped SR by like what 0.5? affected SR by .03 actually but I made it easier anyway

[Hyper]
00:21:960 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - I'm not even sure if I could play this. Probably too many hitcircles anyways, put a slider in there. two actually

00:48:851 (1,2,3,4,5) - whoa again with the hexes man too much spacing. Flow is hard so spacing shouldn't be so much. pentagons actually but fixed

01:23:359 (8,9,1) - Spacing is very large again, not represented by much in the song. not that large but for consistency fixed

[Nowhere's Another]
00:07:037 (2,3,4,5,6) - If you're going to use such random spacing, you need to keep doing it throughout the map, which you aren't doing. Either change the other parts of the map so the spacing is relatively random, or make this section more consistent. fixed

00:14:499 (3,4) - These sliders just don't sound right, you need to switch it to start on white ticks. ^

[Extra]
00:33:307 (4) - Probably need to make this a NC to be as readable as possible. fair

00:38:281 (4) - ^ ^

Needs a lot of polish in it, I didn't spend too much time modding this, but I wish you good luck!

Osuology wrote:

I meant that in an Advanced, you probably should go for two beats in between. I'm sorry that I didn't specify anything about it, I was very tired xd
It's not because it's named Advanced, but rather that it's the difficulty of an advanced.

-BlueSun- wrote:

Nowhere's another

00:00:975 (5,6,7,8,9) - thhis stream is awkwardly shaped and thus is not good for flow. fixed
00:16:519 (1,2) - change (2) so it looks like (1) for better aesthetic. ^
00:38:592 (5,6) - make this switch places for better flow.no, (5) follows the sliderbody's path and (5,6,1) is an acute angled jump but (6)wasn't properly spaced so there's that

Extra

00:08:747 (1,2,1) - no reason to use this DS, not good for flow. anti-jump is here for emphasis on the calmer sound although I moved it to be in the direction of (7)'s body
00:15:276 (1) - ctrl - G this for better flow? ok
00:18:695 (7) - ^ ^
00:24:291 (2) - this slider is following a direction that goes out the playfield, so it's not good for flow. this pattern wasn't meant to be comfortable to play, i think it's fine considering the type of pattern i was going for
00:39:524 (3,4) - ^ no, symmetry
00:41:390 (1) - ^ i want to keep it that way considering how it looks
00:37:504 (1,2,3) - this feels VERY awkward to play, consider changing. how though? it's the same kind of emphasis as 00:32:530 - and 00:35:017 - so players should be used to it
01:28:644 (1) - move the middle node of the slider so it's curving the other way for better flow, as, right now, it's moving in the opposite direction of the next
object. ok
01:30:820 (2,2) - blanket this? ^

good luck

squirrelpascals wrote:

Hi, m4m

I'll be gone for a short while, so here's what I have so far. No KD until I finish, please finished

Extra

• 00:00:820 (4,5,6) - Make the start of this stream parallel to the jump? Just move 5 more to the left made a spicy triangle instead

• 00:03:773 (1,1) - Overlap or move these further away? i think they're fine for now, they're not overlapping

• 00:08:281 (7,1,2,1) - I see why you chose small spacing ehre, but it's a little too small, and is suprising to the playera nd uncomfortable to play. Maybe spacing like this would be better? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7059557 i really want to keep this pattern

• 00:26:079 (6) - Move this apart from the slidertail more, like you did at 00:17:763 (1,2,3) - okay

• 00:30:820 (9,1) - Maybe use this nc pattern to better suggest that there's a new rhythm: https://imgur-archive.ppy.sh/7I3DkyQ.png good idea

• 00:33:929 (1,3) - Blanket? okay

• 00:40:768 (5,1,2) - Same as the first mod, make the entry to this stream parallel with the jump. It will make the stream flow a little bit better, even if its not noticeable it will feel better ^

• 01:12:167 (5,2) - Space these ^

• 01:12:789 (2,3,4) - Same thing as 00:40:768 (5,1,2) ^

• 01:26:467 (2,5) - blanket is off oops

• 01:46:675 (3) - This is picky, but move this to the right a little bit so its even between 01:47:141 (1,2) ? okay

Nowhere Another

• 00:00:664 (5,10,1) - Space these? (you can keep 10 and 1 stacked ofc) okay

• 00:02:374 (4) - 00:04:084 (1) - 00:09:058 (1) - Maybe you can mute these slider ends, and mute other ones like that too? optional i think they're fine for now

• 00:05:794 (2,1) - Space these? okay

• 00:13:877 (7) - Move this up because of the way 00:13:644 (5,6) - is pointing? changed the pattern a bit

• 00:23:514 (4) - I would replace this slider with 2 circles instead because of the white tick at 00:23:670 - i like how it plays

• 00:43:255 (3,4,5,6,7) - Make the entry of this stream parallel with the jump? okay

• 00:46:675 (2,4) - Space these more? ^

• 00:48:462 (3,4,5,6,7,1,2) - The steam shape following the angle of this jump is strange fixed

• 01:15:431 (2,3,4,5,6) - Again, stream shape is strange ^

• 01:32:219 (6,1) - Make this a slider, like you did with 01:27:245 (5) - ? okay

• 01:33:307 (4,5) - ctrl + g and use this rhythm instead?^

Hypaa

• 00:20:716 (7,8) - Space this like you did with the triple at 00:11:157 (4,5) - ? okay

• 01:29:887 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - These jumps are fine to use, but I havent seen them in a Hyper diff before with this combo pattern. Maybe reemove the ncs? they're okay imo

I don't have many complaints for this one

Advanced

• 00:06:260 (6,7,1) - These jumps feel a little bit big, even if they're straight. This 00:03:773 (7,8) - has a 1.5x ds and the other one has 2x reduced

• 00:08:903 (7,1,2) - This might be a little too hard to read for an advanced diff? made it easier

• 00:40:923 (3,4,5,1) - ^ ^

• 00:50:094 (1) - This is just a suggestion, but maybe you can split this up into multiple repeat sliders so it's a little more fun to play? Something like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7060736 You did this here too 01:19:939 (4,5,6,7) - good idea

• 01:29:887 (1,2,3,4) - Put a little more space in between these? okay

Good job

Ekoro Standard

• 00:12:478 - Nothing here? added a note

• 00:23:980 (1) - You can curve this more for a better blanket it's probably fine for now

• 00:28:799 (1) - The 1 1/2 beat break followed by a note on a red tick might confuse a normal player, since there's no strong sound here removed the note

Good luck guys!

Firetruck wrote:

Ekoro's Standard

00:00:354 (1,2,3,4) - if i were you i wouldn't stack these, the sound on the red tick is pretty loud and it can cause confusion with the player, also since this is the easiest diff the immediate stacking might be too much de-stacked them
00:01:597 (1) - why not like this? looks cleaner it was impossible to do this with one anchor in the past, so had to do so :')
00:06:260 - add note? to keep consistensy yeah
00:06:571 (1) - http://prntscr.com/dy1lk2 ? looks neater xd same as above :') i "remapped" this part anyway
honestly just look over all those curvy sliders, they look kinda bad and could be improved (like what i showed u) you wouldn't know if i did tell you, but this was mapped when you had to do a lot of anchor points to make these curvy sliders. I'm too lazy to remap it so i'm trying to leave it as it is, while fixing the suggestions, if necessary.
00:21:493 (1,2) - since you follow vocals, you shouldn't stack these. the girl starts singing on 2 so it doesn't really make sense to why these would be stacked moved the stack 1/1 earlier
00:23:980 (1) - you sure about this repeat? i would change this to something else if i were you, especially since this is the easiest diff hm, idk what else i could do here anyway
00:28:644 - add note? feels kinda empty and you mapped this beat before, so why not now? real didn't update my diff when you modded it, i already added a note here! (consider it as fixed heheh)
00:28:955 (1) - same about repeat as earlier i don't really see what's wrong here, if it's a critical case i might replace it with two sliders
00:31:442 (1,1,2,1) - why not just map these with long sliders like here 00:36:416 (1,2,1) - honestly idk why i did that so i'll just blame that on "trying different stuff on same parts of the song"
00:38:281 (2) - if you do a 1/1 slider here you could follow vocals better fixed along with next suggestion
00:38:903 (1) - there's not really any point of making another long slider here, you mostly follow vocals from what i can see and she clearly starts singing before the slider ends, and there's not really anything else in the song to support this slider didn't seem to take that into account when i mapped it, i guess i get what you mean now, fixed!
00:42:322 - add note? feels really empty it'd feel weird to add a note in this kind of pattern
00:43:877 (1) - why the repeat? just map it! xd wanted to make it symmetrical!
00:46:364 (1) - 1/1 slider to follow vocals better and make it more fun to play done
00:48:229 - add note? the only note i'd add would be at 00:48:074, and 1/2 seems to be too harsh for this diff (unless i make it a full slider)

good luck

mindmaster107 wrote:

[Extra]
The song overall has some flow problems. With some parts with some great rotational flow, it tricks the player into thinking that the next circle is in a certain location. I have pointed out the ones which were very out of place, but the rotation was reversed or broken on sounds which did not need the emphasis.

00:00:975 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - This stream is spaced to fast. Compare it with 00:30:198 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) , you can see they represent different sounds. Squish the first stream to better represent it, or replace it with a slider of partial stream with a kickslider. the second stream you linked is a much softer sound, i don't see the point of reducing the spacing on this one, and a kickslider wouldn't fit as much
00:05:794 (7,1,2,3,1) - The movement of the cursor is really uncomfortable. This isn't even justifiable for a new sound, as the out of place circle 00:06:727 (1) is on a soft note. Change it so that the player can snap back and forth, and tap the circle with a wide angle to emphasize the notes correctly. An example is snipped below. fair

00:08:281 (7) - This breaks the rotation of flow. The player is predicting to flow anticlockwise as they are in the same section, and 00:06:727 (1,2,3,4,5) were anticlockwise. no change for now
00:10:923 (1,2) - This pattern may be unexpected, as previous doubles were regular circles: 00:10:302 (1,2,1,2) . The slider end also doesn't land on any sound, and the sound you do want to emphasize is already done so by the jump to 00:11:234 (3) . if you listen closely there's still an extended sound on the blue tick and using a 1/2 slider wouldn't let me emphasize the white tick
00:31:338 (2) - This is not on the 1/4 spacing the rest of the song follows. because that's the only 1/3 in the song
00:36:105 (5,6,1) - The entry into the slider seems awkward as the slider is aiming away from circle (6). this is fine due to slider leniency
00:36:416 (1,2,3) - The distance from the end of slider (1) to the circle, is not the same as the distance from the circle to slider (3), even though they are the same sound. (3) was meant to be reversed, good catch
00:34:550 (3) - This is facing perpendicular from the expected path for rotation. If you are trying to reverse the rotation, you need a snapping motion. The near 90 degree snap is not appropriate for this, so change it so it is sharper, or just follows the rotation (Flip the slider horizontally). ^
01:03:462 (8,9,1) - The jump is too wide. Change the direction the slider head is pointing. i don't see what's wrong with it
01:15:276 (2) - This circle breaks the direction of rotation, at a part of a song where it doesn't change section. ^
01:47:141 (1,2,3,4) - 4 is not placed as a square due to the stack pushing it out of the way. The circles are too close together, so players think they are clicked one after the other. Maybe make it a slider square blue dragon style? It may help tell the difference between it and previous jumps/ The final jump.
1/2 notes are usually spaced much more though, the only times ive used such a low spacing was on 1/1 notes

6th wrote:

[Advanced]
01:09:214 (2,3,4,5) - 4 cercles à la suite peuvent être assez surprenants puisque tu n'as jamais utilisé de tel pattern précédemment. Peut-être pourrais-tu ajouter un slider ? Même problème ici 01:44:032 (2,3,4,5) -
01:26:157 - Ignorer ceci me semble être une mauvaise idée dans la mesure où tu ne suis pas la voix aussi fidèlement dans toute la map (ou du moins ça ne se remarque pas). Même problème ici 01:35:949 (1) -

[Hyper]
00:32:841 (1,2,3,4,5) - Le spacing ne semble pas avoir de raison d'être aussi irrégulier. En fait, il devrait même augmenter entre (3) et (4).
00:45:431 (6) - Répète-le 1 fois (consistency avec 00:42:944 (6) - )
01:24:758 (4,5,6,7,8,9) - Ces doubles me semblent assez incongrus et hasardeux dans une map avec autant de mouvement.
01:44:032 (2,3,4,5) - Ce flow est beaucoup plus dur à suivre que celui de 01:41:545 (2,3,4,5) - , essaie d'équilibrer un peu.

[Another]
00:01:131 (7) - Ce clap sonne très mal.
01:33:617 (5) - Cette note semble trop banale, ce serait bien de jouer sur le spacing ou le flow.

[Extra]
01:39:835 (1,1,1) - Ce serait bien d'augmenter le spacing entre ces cercles légèrement pour qu'on ait pas une impression d'overlap.
Je n'ai rien de particulièrement important à signaler.

C'est un bon mapset, bonne chance !

Zerss wrote:

    General

1. I made an HD version of the wallpaper, so the character is clearely visible on a 16/9 screen. It'll show exactly like before on 4/3 screens, don't worry. holy shit thanks

    Advanced

1. 00:08:747 - Why no crash sounds here? this sound is much quieter than the previous ones, keeping crash sounds wouldn't emphasize it well enough
2. 00:08:281 (5,6,7,1,2) - Compared to the whole map, this pattern isn't really smooth, mostly with the (7,1) because it (the transition normally bringed by the crashes) doesn't feel important at all. here again i wanted to do something different for the quieter sounds, so that's why i made this anti-flow because using different spacing would be hard to follow for hard players i guess
3. 00:30:198 (5,6,7) - isn't much consistent compared to 00:50:094 (1,2,3,4) -. Make sure to choose one way to do it and make it to the whole map. fixed
4. 01:23:203 (7) - This note is feeling a bit weird compared to the one before, because, not as the one before, this note doesn't have much important sound on the "keyboard push" status. In my opinion, a rhythm like this would fit more.my plan with the repeat slider was to follow the synth but your suggestion sounds good aswell so why not

    Hyper

1. Same thing about the crash on Advanced. ^
2. 00:06:571 - I don't know what you did there, most new combos doesn't make sense compared to what happend before nor what NC is there on the other diffs. oops overlooked it, should be fine now
3. 00:31:442 (8) - NC. okay
4. 01:42:789 (7,8) - Distance (with stacking) is really really bad here, you should do something about it.^

1. 00:21:183 (3,1) - Are you sure about the stack? you should'nt do it like this as you have the note stacked which lands on the downbeat , its not bad in all cases but in this case the downbeat has a intenser piano (?) or melody sound than the sound at 00:21:183 - so thats why stacking it doesnt give it proper spacing emphasis
2. 01:21:183 - please dont execute this beat on a slider end , its the start of kiai . Its a really important beat and executing it on sliderend is just not fine. So make it clickable .Easy fix is that remove the repeat from 01:20:872 (3) - and add circle at downbeat
3. 01:35:483 (3) - For what reason you didnt finish the slider at 01:36:105 - ? it makes no sense at all . The held vocal starts from 01:36:105 - and strong sound is also at 01:36:105 - so theres just no reason to ignore it

1. 00:00:354 (1,2,3,4) - its not a big deal but if you could make 3 and 4 different than 1 and 2 in terms of shapes it would be nicer as 00:00:354 (1,2) - are supporting snares and 00:00:975 (3,4) - are supporting. As they are supporting different sounds , executing them differently would be cool as well
2. 00:02:374 (4) - Your rhythm here is kinda inconsistent with the patterns in next combos like 00:04:550 (2,3) - 00:07:037 (2,3) - etc and why i am saying this is because in the latter patterns your rhythm is better in terms of emphasis but in this case the beat at 00:02:685 - is being executed by slider repeat while in other cases its clickable ,the piano itself at 00:02:685 - is emphasized in the song so having it clickable would be better
3. 00:27:089 (3,4) - any reason you use 1.65 Ds instead of your average 1.0 DS? the ds gap is pretty huge for this level of difficulty and i cant seem to find any valid reason for increase in DS . Theres no beat at 00:27:400 - that is more impactful than others etc so its better to use consistent ds
4. 00:30:820 (7,8,1) - Dont use "visual" spacing of these 1/3 same as the visual spacing of 1/4 because these notes are 1/3 and same spacing as 1/4 is gonna make them misread it as 1/4
5. 00:37:970 (7) - The fact that you are leaving 00:38:281 - this intense vocal unclickable is pretty soso .what you could do is change 00:37:970 (7) - into 1/2 slider and add a circle at the latter white tick ... In summary just make the intense vocal at 00:38:281 - clickable because it deserves it
6. 00:35:949 - in this whole section you need to re-do your NC's as some of your NC's are each downbeat while others are 2 downbeats , theres no consistency about these so better work on it to make it more consistent
7. 01:34:706 (4,5,6,7) - this is actually a three star difficulty and having same visual spacing for both 1/2 and 1/4 is not beginner friendly at all . the spacing concept you used for 01:35:017 (5,6,7) - is wrong as 01:35:017 (5,6) - are 1/1 and 01:35:328 (6,7) - are 1/2 but the spacing looks exactly the same
8. 01:40:768 (3,4,1) - Well here stacking 3 and 4 is fine but stacking 1 also is not fine because the slider head supports a much stronger vocal and theres an intense cymbal crash sound which should be emphasized but stacking them doesnt give it any spacing emphasis so just unstack 01:41:079 (1) - and use ur average DS for this note
9. 01:41:545 (2,3,4) - Kinda awkward rhythm choice here since the more impactful sounds are at the white ticks , eg 01:41:701 - 01:42:012 - but you are prioritizing the red ticks instead

1. 00:07:815 - Ici tu pourrais rajouter quelque chose, ça pourrait être plus sympa, plutôt que de laisser un vide sur une partie qui pourrait être mappée je pense.
2. 00:26:467 (1,3) - Pourquoi ne pas essayer de mettre ces deux sliders en parallèle au niveau des points clickables?
3. 00:43:877 (1) - Tu ne veux pas essayer de split celui la en plusieurs slider, parce que selon moi faire un double reverse sur un long slider, c'est un peu ennuyant, sachant que c'est une standard, tu pourrais essayer de faire un truc un peu plus compliqué ^^
4. 00:48:229 - Tu peux pas essayer de rajouter un cercle ici, pour que ça passe un peu mieux au niveau du flow du rythme et puis ça évitera au débutant de faire un 100 ou un 50 sur ce cercle: 00:48:540 (3) -
5. 01:24:291 (1) - Ce slider est vachement compliqué a lire au niveau du rythme je trouve, parce qu'avant, tu laisses un gros blanc, et c'est dur pour réussir a identifier le nouveau rythme, certains joueurs pourrais s'emmeler les pinceaux et fail la partie qui suit, donc ce que je pourrais te conseiller pour éviter ça, ce serait d'ajouter un cercle ici: 01:23:980 -
6. 01:38:592 (1) - Ce spinner est un peu long non? Et puis tu pourrais essayer de la mapper cette partie la aussi, genre tu arrête ton spinner ici: 01:39:680 - Et tu rajoute un beat clickable ici: 01:39:991 -
7. Cette diff est vraiment cool, c'est juste dommage qu'il y ait des beats qui soit manquants, ou qu'il y ait des parties mappées sur des voix et d'un coup ça passe sur le fond de la musique, mais dans l'ensemble, la diff est nice :3

1. 00:08:747 (6,7,1) - J'aime pas trop le flow de ce passage, je pense que pour une advanced, c'est un peu dur, même si la diff m'a l'air d'être dure en elle même. Je te propose ça, dis-moi si tu penses que c'est mieux ou pas? https://puu.sh/tQ3W1/0ac116c160.png
2. 00:19:628 (4,5,6,7) - Avec tout ces stacks, on peut vite s'y perdre je pense, essaie de faire en sorte qu'un des slider ne se stack pas sur l'autre, aprés c'est mon avis, essaie de NC quelque part sinon pour qu'on puisse mieux distinguer ou cliquer.
3. J'ai rien d'autre a dire, parce que la map est juste magnifique, j'adore le style que tu as utilisé, tu le maitrises tellement bien .w.

DeRandom Otaku wrote:

from q

[Advanced]

1. 00:00:354 (1,2,3,4) - its not a big deal but if you could make 3 and 4 different than 1 and 2 in terms of shapes it would be nicer as 00:00:354 (1,2) - are supporting snares and 00:00:975 (3,4) - are supporting. As they are supporting different sounds , executing them differently would be cool as well id kinda like to keep this pattern, it's made to emphasize the snares on white ticks
2. 00:02:374 (4) - Your rhythm here is kinda inconsistent with the patterns in next combos like 00:04:550 (2,3) - 00:07:037 (2,3) - etc and why i am saying this is because in the latter patterns your rhythm is better in terms of emphasis but in this case the beat at 00:02:685 - is being executed by slider repeat while in other cases its clickable ,the piano itself at 00:02:685 - is emphasized in the song so having it clickable would be better good point, fixed
3. 00:27:089 (3,4) - any reason you use 1.65 Ds instead of your average 1.0 DS? the ds gap is pretty huge for this level of difficulty and i cant seem to find any valid reason for increase in DS . Theres no beat at 00:27:400 - that is more impactful than others etc so its better to use consistent ds ^
4. 00:30:820 (7,8,1) - Dont use "visual" spacing of these 1/3 same as the visual spacing of 1/4 because these notes are 1/3 and same spacing as 1/4 is gonna make them misread it as 1/4 ^
5. 00:37:970 (7) - The fact that you are leaving 00:38:281 - this intense vocal unclickable is pretty soso .what you could do is change 00:37:970 (7) - into 1/2 slider and add a circle at the latter white tick ... In summary just make the intense vocal at 00:38:281 - clickable because it deserves it ^
6. 00:35:949 - in this whole section you need to re-do your NC's as some of your NC's are each downbeat while others are 2 downbeats , theres no consistency about these so better work on it to make it more consistent i think they're fixed now?
7. 01:34:706 (4,5,6,7) - this is actually a three star difficulty and having same visual spacing for both 1/2 and 1/4 is not beginner friendly at all . the spacing concept you used for 01:35:017 (5,6,7) - is wrong as 01:35:017 (5,6) - are 1/1 and 01:35:328 (6,7) - are 1/2 but the spacing looks exactly the same how'd i miss that
8. 01:40:768 (3,4,1) - Well here stacking 3 and 4 is fine but stacking 1 also is not fine because the slider head supports a much stronger vocal and theres an intense cymbal crash sound which should be emphasized but stacking them doesnt give it any spacing emphasis so just unstack 01:41:079 (1) - and use ur average DS for this note good idea
9. 01:41:545 (2,3,4) - Kinda awkward rhythm choice here since the more impactful sounds are at the white ticks , eg 01:41:701 - 01:42:012 - but you are prioritizing the red ticks instead i think the sounds on the red ticks are more prominent and should be emphasized instead of the drums here
   

gl

Pachiru wrote:

[Advanced]

1. 00:08:747 (6,7,1) - J'aime pas trop le flow de ce passage, je pense que pour une advanced, c'est un peu dur, même si la diff m'a l'air d'être dure en elle même. Je te propose ça, dis-moi si tu penses que c'est mieux ou pas? https://puu.sh/tQ3W1/0ac116c160.png bonne idée
   
2. 00:19:628 (4,5,6,7) - Avec tout ces stacks, on peut vite s'y perdre je pense, essaie de faire en sorte qu'un des slider ne se stack pas sur l'autre, aprés c'est mon avis, essaie de NC quelque part sinon pour qu'on puisse mieux distinguer ou cliquer. ok, changé
   
3. J'ai rien d'autre a dire, parce que la map est juste magnifique, j'adore le style que tu as utilisé, tu le maitrises tellement bien .w.

J'te jette deux étoiles a la gueule pour te motiver a la rank, parce qu'elle vaut vachement le détour ! :3
Bonne chance pour le ranking !