thank you for modsnowball112 wrote:
Heya, random mod
- Not sure if so much kiai time is a good idea, yes the song is kind of intense all the way through but I think you could use it better in connection with the higher note density at the end of the song only from 01:26:870 to 01:45:032 and remove the other two kiai times it's fine.
Kantan
- I think it would sound and transition better to the next part if you move 00:11:303 (10) to 00:10:654 and change to d for the drums and then change 00:11:627 (11) to D to make it similar to 00:22:005 (28). fixed
- I think 00:16:167 (18,19) - ctrl+g would sound better for the high sound here, 00:16:167 is lower. retained to make the end of sequence as d to have consistency with next sequence
- 00:20:384 (25,26) ctrl+g and 00:21:357 k as well, you have fairly strong sounds here in the music. no change to make it consistent with other diffs
- You may want to remove 00:30:762 for better emphasis of the 3k starting at 00:31:086, also the density is relatively high otherwise. fixed
- I think you could remove the note at 00:39:519, it feels nicer for structure in this part. nope, the intensity is increasing
- I think you could change both 00:36:924 and 00:40:816 to k for better emphasis of the high sounds here. only change 00:40:816 - , because 00:36:924 has same sound with 00:36:276 (50,51) -
- 00:44:059 (62,63,64) and 00:49:248 (71,72,73) have the same sounds, so I think you should use similar patterns. How about 00:44:059 (62,63,64) ddk and then 00:45:357 (65,66,67,68,69,70) d k d kdk? I feel like the sounds on 00:46:005 (66,68) are stronger than those on 00:45:357 (65,67), and kdk at the end would be nice for emphasis of the strong sound on 00:47:951. changed in alternative way
- How about having 00:51:519 (76,77) as dK and 00:53:140 D? not changed
- Not sure why there is a note on 00:54:113 if you have a fairly strong long sound starting at 00:53:789, I'd suggest you move this note to 00:54:762 instead. I also think 00:55:735 would sound better as d for better emphasis of the use of k around this note. retained to follow the bg vocal
- I think the whole part from 00:58:330 to 01:02:221 would sound better if you do something similar to what I recommended for the part of 00:37:573, but in reverse. In contrast to that part, there is an additional high sound on 00:58:330 (88,89) for example, so I think it would be better if you: ctrl+g 00:57:681 (87,88) and then remove the note on 01:00:276 and change 00:59:627 to k as well for better emphasis of this. Lastly, you could make 01:00:924 (91,92,93,94,95) kkddk in contrast to the ddkkd from before and give your map some better overall structure imo. You should end up with d k k kkddk starting from 00:57:681. only swapped 00:57:681 (87,88)
- I feel like you could change 01:08:059 to d, the sounds here are slightly lower than in the 3-note 2/1 patterns around it, and I think this would be more interesting than three dkd patterns after each other. fixed
- I think it would sound better if you remove 01:23:303 and ctrl+g 01:23:627 (119,120), it feels like the stronger finish is on 01:24:276. no
Futsuu
- How about 00:10:978 k and remove 00:11:303 and put a finish on 00:11:627? I think this would help to transition to the next part of the song. retained for better spread with muzu (only add finish)
- I think it would sound much better if you move 00:16:167 to 00:16:330 and then have 00:15:843 (33,34,35,36,37) as dk kd k for better emphasis of the claps and the strong sound on the last note of this pattern. moved but change to dkd for more simple patterm
- Maybe try 00:13:573 d, the strong claps are on the two notes after this one, so I think dkk would fit better. You could also remove 00:13:248 for some more generous spacing. no change, the claps are same imo
- 00:22:005 - Add finish? Would sound nice for transition to the new part. fixed
Muzukashii
- I think it would sound much better if stuff like 00:20:708 (52,53,54,55,56) is kdkdk for emphasis of the claps and higher sounds on the white ticks. dkdkd is fine for the drum in white tick
- Maybe 00:14:546 k? I think it would work nicely to have kkd dkk here no, dkd can also fits with the instrument
- I think 00:19:411 (44,45,46,47,48) would sound better as ddkkd to keep the 1/1 dkdk structure in this part.not sounds good to me
Oni
- The beginning of this diff kind of bothers me, I think you should move 00:02:140 to 00:02:221 and 00:04:735 to 00:04:816 to follow the stronger sounds OR change 00:01:897 and 00:04:492 to d to make it clear that you're following the background instrument here. Background instrument lands on the blue tick, the strong high sounds on the white if you listen carefully. Similar with Inner Oni. no change, i prefer to use k as primary color. also i think it is obvious that the sound is in blue tick
- How about 00:13:735 (31,32,33,34) as kkdk? I think this works better to spread emphasis on the strong sound of 00:14:221 better, 00:14:059 feels lower in my opinion. Similar with 00:18:924 (65,66,67,68) etc. current color can emphasis the clap better
Good luck
thank you for modNyan wrote:
[Kantan]
those are minor suggestions not crucial
00:40:816 (58) - kat yes
01:05:465 (98) - don no, changed 01:08:059 - instead
01:22:654 (117) - delete and add a kat at 01:22:324 nice
01:45:033 (19) - add Finish fixed
[Futsuu]
00:28:654 - add a kat, sync with synth keep for simplicity
00:35:789 (92) - kat no
01:19:086 (223) - replace with spinner ok
01:41:303 - add a kat keep
01:43:248 - add a don ^
[Muzu]
00:05:627 (12) - move to 00:05:465 hmm no
00:14:221 (21,22,23,24) - (d ddd k d) not changed for better spread with futsuu
00:19:411 (44,45,46,47,48) - (k ddd k d) ^
00:20:465 (50) - delete, sync with synth ^
[Oni]
01:00:762 (55,56,57) - d k fixed
01:01:573 (62,63) - kkd
fixed
[Inner Oni]
00:32:059 - add a kat, sync with sampling voice keep to just follow the woob woob sound
00:33:519 (37) - better delete keep