forum

P*Light - YELLOW SPLASH!! [Taiko]

posted
Total Posts
37
show more
Topic Starter
Volta

tasuke912 wrote:

Sorry for late
[ General]
  1. 00:32:384 - kiai time should be extended until here.
  2. 01:45:032 - ^
  3. 00:42:762 - 00:53:140 - Consider removing kiai time
    fixed
[ Kantan]
  1. 00:10:654 (10,11) - Consider removing these notes to emphasize kiai start time. i think it will give more impact like this. i mean, when you raised the intensity, and then BAM! end it with a finisher.
  2. 00:12:276 - I recommend adding a note, kiai doesn't need too many breaks. ofc the break here is necessary because ^
  3. 00:17:465 - 00:22:654 - ^. Then removed 00:20:059 (26,27) - to make a break? added note at 00:17:465 -
  4. 00:45:032 (66) - Maybe move to 00:45:681 - ? it would be more natural imo.moved and changed to d
    00:50:221 (75) - ^. Then adjust colors. fixed
  5. 01:17:789 (113,114,115,116,117) - seems bit too hard for Kantan. I recommend removing 01:18:762 (116) - this note. fixed
  6. 01:25:248 (124) - should be moved to 1/2 right for the consistency with 01:25:897 (125) -. You followed second sound of 1/2 doublet rhythm at 125. remain unchanged because the rhythm will be a bit hard for beginner, so i put it in white tick for simplicity
  7. 01:26:870 (127) - Why not Finish? fixed
  8. 01:30:113 - add a note for the same reason? fixed
[ Futsuu]
  1. 00:11:303 (20) - remove? It looks dense fixed
  2. 00:51:843 (144,145,146,147,148) - Dense too, consider removing 00:52:492 (146,147) -? ^
  3. 00:53:140 (149) - Finish? ^
  4. 01:03:194 (184) - Finish would fit to the clap sound as well might be too loud, k is also fine imo
  5. 01:25:248 (9) - same as Kantan, move to 1/2 right. remain unchanged for same reason
  6. 01:34:654 (17) - Finish too fixed
[ Muzukashii]
  1. I'm worry about difficulty spread, between M-O is huger than F-M. Muzukashii should have more triplets and Oni can be easier a little. Following timestamps are able to be placed 1/4 notes.
  2. 00:14:384 - 00:19:573 - 00:24:762 - added 1/4
  3. 00:51:519 - ^
  4. 01:37:411 - ^
  5. 01:03:194 (49) - Finish? kept
  6. 01:34:330 (12) - 01:44:708 (60) - ^ ^ because i think adding a finisher will lower the impact at 01:45:032 -
thanks tasuke!

additional changes in oni:
> removed notes at 00:30:194 - , 00:35:546 - , 00:38:384 - , 00:39:681 - , 00:52:005 - , 00:55:897 - , 00:59:789 - , 00:59:870 - , 01:42:843 -
JUDYDANNY
Hello, via M4M~~
and sorry to late :?
Introduction
  1. Inner Oni can still improve imo, and sme questionable 1/6.
  2. Oni ~ Muzukashii Intro still over working imo. plz consider again.
  3. Diff-Spread is relatively large, but not big issues imo.
Symbol meaning
 
  1. >> Normal suggestion.
    Big text >> Strong suggestion.
    :?: >> Questionable imo.
    :!: >>> Needs to improve some. (Rhythm is not good , plays or sounds weird)
    No comment >>simple (you can notice easily: just hits on drums or simple beats) , or already explained on the other place.
 or JUST MY OPINION.

[Kantan]
  1. 00:08:708 - uum… remove? It plays better as beginners.
  2. 00:09:681 - same, not strong sounds after finisher.
  3. 00:18:762 - change to k? make a consistent with before kkd and make a inconsistent (gap)with after dkd.
  4. 01:31:411 - same.
  5. 00:12:924 - , 00:18:113 - ...d? same as 01:35:951 - ?
  6. 00:30:762 - can add d imo,
  7. 00:38:870 - change k? to emphasized to sounds up than 00:33:681 - (drum roll).
  8. 00:54:113 - move to 00:54:762 - ? its early following 1/1 triple imo.
  9. 00:55:735 (86,87) - dk?
  10. 01:11:951 - add note on purpose? same as other diffs.
  11. 01:19:086 - no spinner?
  12. 01:22:978 (121,122,123) - remove the finishres? its kind to play as beginners .

  13. 01:27:194 - ,01:25:897 (126,127) - remove , 01:26:546 - add k instead? there’re high dense. I think its better to make a lower dense and simple rhythm.

[Futsuu]
  1. 00:08:059 - remove or move to 00:07:411 -
  2. 00:13:573 (24,25,26,27) - change to ddk-k instead? to focus the more main part pitch.
  3. 00:18:762 (40,41,42) - ddk?
  4. 00:23:627 (55,56,57,58,59) - change to like… same patterns? (k-ddk-k or k-kkk (for variation with bach chorus))
  5. 01:31:411 (6,7) - dd?
  6. 01:36:276 (21,22,23,24,25,26) - same as others.
  7. Either? from 00:30:113 - it sounds noisy but you dont put on. I think you can add notes more somewhere, imo.
    • A 00:28:816 - move to ½ left, 00:28:978 - add don? .I guess you can put some redlines . Its not bad way.
      B.00:28:816 - remove , 00:30:113 - add d, 00:30:924 - move to 00:30:600 - ?
  8. from 01:41:465 - ~~ , same as above.

  9. 00:39:843 - remove...? umm.. lol plays a bit better imo, there’re no reasons.
  10. 00:40:654 - move to 00:41:303 - and change to k? felt the early appeared ½ pattern imo.
  11. 00:52:167 - bit oversounded as Futsuu imo…? 00:50:546 (138,139,140,141,142,143) - dkd-dkd change to dkddk-k or dkdkd-k?
  12. like Muzukashii, 01:03:843 - move to 01:05:140 - and 01:05:465 - change d?
  13. 01:06:438 - , 01:09:032 - , 01:10:654 - same .
  14. 01:19:086 - no big notes?
  15. 01:27:194 - change to k?

[Muzukashii]
  1. 00:02:708 (4,5) - , 00:05:627 - remove? feel many notes a bit imo.
    :?: 00:22:978 (64,65,66,67,68,69,70) - ,01:35:627 (17,18,19,20,21,22,23) - Inconsistency rhythm? change to kd-dkkd-k? (or kd-dkkddk)
  2. 00:15:367 - remove? I think its lower priority to put on there comparing with the diff-spread.
    • And, suggest them.
    1. 00:16:248 - remove , from 00:15:681 - - , add ¼ kat triple, and 00:15:843 - change k instead?
  3. 00:31:573 (107,108,109) - , 01:44:222 (59,60,61) - kkk ?
  4. 00:32:059 - add k? lol to make aconsistenty with 00:21:681 - 01:44:708 - , It follows the little splash sounded.
  5. 00:36:032 - remove and 00:36:113 - change k? refer to Oni.
  6. 00:45:681 - ,00:50:870 - change to k, to make a consistent with 00:43:086 - .
  7. 00:52:978 - remove? drum sounds not well.
    • |00:52:492 - can remove too imo, to make a break and emphasized to next lack o f don parts lol.
  8. 01:04:492 (5,6) - remove , and 01:04:978 - ,01:05:140 - add d, k? Its more clean with 4/4 rhythm and break time.
  9. 01:07:086 (16,17) - same
  10. hmm… from 01:17:951 - all k that joined the finisher Dons, remove is better for overall difficulty.
    • If you applied ^, sugegst this.
    1. 01:19:086 - not bad to change K like kantan.
[Oni]
  1. 00:02:140 - , 00:03:357 - , 00:04:735 - ,00:05:627 - remove? feel many notes a bit imo.
  2. 00:07:330 - move to ¼ right?
  3. 00:32:059 - add k? lol to make aconsistenty with 00:21:681 - 01:44:708 - , It follows the little splash sounded.
  4. 00:35:789 (17,18,19,20,21,22) - change to kkd-k-d? it sounds better to express the little quiet part to make the simple( abekobe).
  5. 00:45:519 (77,78,79) - change to ddk ? to make a consistent with ½ colors 00:43:086 (62,63,64,65,66) - , and make a inconsistent with ½ colors 00:46:816 (85,86,87) - to express the variation.
  6. 00:55:573 - move to 00:55:897 - ? to make a consistent with …backsounds rhythm.
  7. 00:57:438 - move to 00:57:924 - ? same as above.
  8. 00:59:627 - change to k ? same as above, to make a consistent with cymbals hits on before and after bars?
    |01:09:843 - I have a question, k is on purpose?


    :?: 01:28:167 - ~~ ½ colors kkdkkddkd sounds very questionable…. Either?
    • A.01:28:654 (38,39,40,41,42,43,44) - kdkkd-d-k change to kdk-k-ddk?
      B.01:29:140 - change to k?
      C.01:28:167 - ~~ change to k-kkd-k-kkddk-k-d? * 01:28:735 - If you wont ignore , plz igonore, but it sounds the best imo as Oni.
[Inner Oni]
  1. 00:06:276 - k? backsounds up.
  2. 00:06:924 - ~~ add more? like… 00:06:924 - ,00:07:248 - , 00:07:411 - , 00:07:978 - ,
    00:08:059 - . Its lack of following the drum part imo.
    1. and, 00:08:870 - remove for making a break instead?
  3. 00:13:492 - remove? no strong reverb bass and overempasized the main slar imo.
  4. 00:17:870 - same.
  5. 00:17:627 - uum… not similar as00:11:627 (69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85) - .
    How about D-d-k-ddkkd-k-k from 00:16:816 - ? the reason is ↓
    1. 00:17:221 - move to 00:17:384 - and change to d?
    2. 00:17:708 - remove
    3. 00:17:627 - d not same as 00:17:303 - rogic.
    4. 00:17:546 - change to k to make a consistent with 1st 00:12:357 - ?
  6. 00:16:573 - move to 00:16:411 - ? 00:16:654 (113,114) - no joined the 1/4 notes sounds better to play such a high dense imo.
  7. 00:24:194 - add d? can follow the more.. backchorus up.
  8. 00:25:492 - add d? can follow the more.. lower synthesizer.
  9. 00:27:681 (64,65,66,1) - dddk? and 00:28:816 (5,6,7,8) - kkkd? instead?
    1st, not fits on there with high pitch noise sounds imo .
    2nd, On the other side of synthesizer , it sounds and plays not well ...

    :?: 00:32:059 - I really want to put on k … sounds the little splash…
  10. 00:41:870 - remove? not sounds well.
  11. 00:42:600 - splash sounds still slar. k sounds better?
  12. 01:02:059 (16,17,18) - change ¼ kkd? not sounds well over ¼ sound.
  13. from 01:03:519 - part, Its a bit over working imo. It can make more nerf (lower frequency of ¼), consider again plz…
  14. 01:24:600 - , 01:24:924 - add kd , 01:25:248 - change k? lol
  15. 01:36:843 - add d , 01:38:140 - add d? same as 1st.
  16. 01:40:330 (2,3,4,1) - dddk? and 01:41:465 (2,3,4,5) - kkkd?


    01:17:303 (19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45) - omg… dkdddkdddkddkkkddkkkddkkkddkkkd orz lol
I guess Inner Oni still can improve, call me back after improved the Inner (maybe...bout 1~2mods+.. and yourselfmod? lol)
Good luck (¦3[___]
Topic Starter
Volta

JUDYDANNY wrote:

Hello, via M4M~~
and sorry to late :?
Introduction
  1. Inner Oni can still improve imo, and sme questionable 1/6.
  2. Oni ~ Muzukashii Intro still over working imo. plz consider again.
  3. Diff-Spread is relatively large, but not big issues imo.
Symbol meaning
 
  1. >> Normal suggestion.
    Big text >> Strong suggestion.
    :?: >> Questionable imo.
    :!: >>> Needs to improve some. (Rhythm is not good , plays or sounds weird)
    No comment >>simple (you can notice easily: just hits on drums or simple beats) , or already explained on the other place.
 or JUST MY OPINION.

[Kantan]
  1. 00:08:708 - uum… remove? It plays better as beginners. fixed.
  2. 00:09:681 - same, not strong sounds after finisher. ^ fixed
  3. 00:18:762 - change to k? make a consistent with before kkd and make a inconsistent (gap)with after dkd.
  4. 01:31:411 - same.
  5. 00:12:924 - , 00:18:113 - ...d? same as 01:35:951 - ?
    whoa all above point is complement each other and good. fixed.
  6. 00:30:762 - can add d imo, hmm i want to make a difference with 00:20:384 - where there is more noise there
  7. 00:38:870 - change k? to emphasized to sounds up than 00:33:681 - (drum roll). i think the drum sound still same until synth sound going up
  8. 00:54:113 - move to 00:54:762 - ? its early following 1/1 triple imo. fixed, and changed to d to emphasis the higher pitch at 00:55:086 - better
  9. 00:55:735 (86,87) - dk? fix
  10. 01:11:951 - add note on purpose? same as other diffs. ok
  11. 01:19:086 - no spinner? wanted to make break in lower diff. but reconsidered and added the spinner.
  12. 01:22:978 (121,122,123) - remove the finishres? its kind to play as beginners . sure
  13. 01:27:194 - ,01:25:897 (126,127) - remove , 01:26:546 - add k instead? there’re high dense. I think its better to make a lower dense and simple rhythm. fixed

[Futsuu]
  1. 00:08:059 - remove or move to 00:07:411 - removed!
  2. 00:13:573 (24,25,26,27) - change to ddk-k instead? to focus the more main part pitch. kkk is more simple and fits the drum well so i prefer to keep it.
  3. 00:18:762 (40,41,42) - ddk? same as ^
  4. 00:23:627 (55,56,57,58,59) - change to like… same patterns? (k-ddk-k or k-kkk (for variation with bach chorus)) changed to k-kkk
  5. 01:31:411 (6,7) - dd? kk
  6. 01:36:276 (21,22,23,24,25,26) - same as others. fixed
  7. Either? from 00:30:113 - it sounds noisy but you dont put on. I think you can add notes more somewhere, imo.
    • A 00:28:816 - move to ½ left, 00:28:978 - add don? .I guess you can put some redlines . Its not bad way.
      B.00:28:816 - remove , 00:30:113 - add d, 00:30:924 - move to 00:30:600 - ?
    A is good~
  8. from 01:41:465 - ~~ , same as above.

  9. 00:39:843 - remove...? umm.. lol plays a bit better imo, there’re no reasons. lol it's noisy here so i think it's ok combined with below mod is good. fixed
  10. 00:40:654 - move to 00:41:303 - and change to k? felt the early appeared ½ pattern imo. fixed
  11. 00:52:167 - bit oversounded as Futsuu imo…? 00:50:546 (138,139,140,141,142,143) - dkd-dkd change to dkddk-k or dkdkd-k? dkddk-k is nice~
  12. like Muzukashii, 01:03:843 - move to 01:05:140 - and 01:05:465 - change d? fixed
  13. 01:06:438 - , 01:09:032 - , 01:10:654 - same . ^
  14. 01:19:086 - no big notes? yeah added K
  15. 01:27:194 - change to k? the melody is going up at 01:27:357 - so i think d here can reflect it better
[Muzukashii]
  1. 00:02:708 (4,5) - , 00:05:627 - remove? feel many notes a bit imo. ok
    :?: 00:22:978 (64,65,66,67,68,69,70) - ,01:35:627 (17,18,19,20,21,22,23) - Inconsistency rhythm? change to kd-dkkd-k? (or kd-dkkddk) changed kd-dkkddk~
  2. 00:15:367 - remove? I think its lower priority to put on there comparing with the diff-spread.
    • And, suggest them.
    1. 00:16:248 - remove , from 00:15:681 - - , add ¼ kat triple, and 00:15:843 - change k instead?
    fixed
  3. 00:31:573 (107,108,109) - , 01:44:222 (59,60,61) - kkk ? got same suggestion before, so applied.
  4. 00:32:059 - add k? lol to make aconsistenty with 00:21:681 - 01:44:708 - , It follows the little splash sounded. at 00:21:681 - 01:44:708 - ,the music is continuous, while at 00:32:059 it has a pause so not putting note there
  5. 00:36:032 - remove and 00:36:113 - change k? refer to Oni. sure
  6. 00:45:681 - ,00:50:870 - change to k, to make a consistent with 00:43:086 - . fixed
  7. 00:52:978 - remove? drum sounds not well.
    • |00:52:492 - can remove too imo, to make a break and emphasized to next lack o f don parts lol.
    fixed. and i made some don in that part lol.
  8. 01:04:492 (5,6) - remove , and 01:04:978 - ,01:05:140 - add d, k? Its more clean with 4/4 rhythm and break time. fixed
  9. 01:07:086 (16,17) - same ^
  10. hmm… from 01:17:951 - all k that joined the finisher Dons, remove is better for overall difficulty. hmm i prefer to keep it to reflect the stroke sound.
    • If you applied ^, sugegst this.
    1. 01:19:086 - not bad to change K like kantan. but K is nice~
continuation...

JUDYDANNY wrote:

[Oni]
  1. 00:02:140 - , 00:03:357 - , 00:04:735 - ,00:05:627 - remove? feel many notes a bit imo. ok
  2. 00:07:330 - move to ¼ right? hmm i think this position more accurate
  3. 00:32:059 - add k? lol to make aconsistenty with 00:21:681 - 01:44:708 - , It follows the little splash sounded. same reason as muzu, to emphasis the pause
  4. 00:35:789 (17,18,19,20,21,22) - change to kkd-k-d? it sounds better to express the little quiet part to make the simple( abekobe). fixed
  5. 00:45:519 (77,78,79) - change to ddk ? to make a consistent with ½ colors 00:43:086 (62,63,64,65,66) - , and make a inconsistent with ½ colors 00:46:816 (85,86,87) - to express the variation. remain unchanged because the don at 00:45:681 - is to follow main melody, like 00:45:357 - and 00:46:005 -
  6. 00:55:573 - move to 00:55:897 - ? to make a consistent with …backsounds rhythm. good~ fixed
  7. 00:57:438 - move to 00:57:924 - ? same as above. ^
  8. 00:59:627 - change to k ? same as above, to make a consistent with cymbals hits on before and after bars? fixed
    |01:09:843 - I have a question, k is on purpose? no, it's an accident lol fixed


    :?: 01:28:167 - ~~ ½ colors kkdkkddkd sounds very questionable…. Either?
    • A.01:28:654 (38,39,40,41,42,43,44) - kdkkd-d-k change to kdk-k-ddk?
      B.01:29:140 - change to k?
      C.01:28:167 - ~~ change to k-kkd-k-kkddk-k-d? * 01:28:735 - If you wont ignore , plz igonore, but it sounds the best imo as Oni.
    hmm i would like to make 1/4 kdkkd for pattern variation there. rearranged a bit from C point. (make k-kkd-k-kdkkd-k-d)

[Inner Oni]
  1. 00:06:276 - k? backsounds up. d is consistenft with 00:03:681 - tho
  2. 00:06:924 - ~~ add more? like… 00:06:924 - ,00:07:248 - , 00:07:411 - , 00:07:978 - ,
    00:08:059 - . Its lack of following the drum part imo. added, but not at 00:07:978 - , 00:08:059 - made break here instead
    1. and, 00:08:870 - remove for making a break instead? because this note is joined with finishers
  3. 00:13:492 - remove? no strong reverb bass and overempasized the main slar imo. hmm it flows good to me.
  4. 00:17:870 - same. rearranged here
  5. 00:17:627 - uum… not similar as00:11:627 (69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85) - .
    How about D-d-k-ddkkd-k-k from 00:16:816 - ? the reason is ↓
    1. 00:17:221 - move to 00:17:384 - and change to d?
    2. 00:17:708 - remove
    3. 00:17:627 - d not same as 00:17:303 - rogic.
    4. 00:17:546 - change to k to make a consistent with 1st 00:12:357 - ?
    fixed... i think. a bit confused so made some change myself too lol
  6. 00:16:573 - move to 00:16:411 - ? 00:16:654 (113,114) - no joined the 1/4 notes sounds better to play such a high dense imo. fixed
  7. 00:24:194 - add d? can follow the more.. backchorus up. fixed
  8. 00:25:492 - add d? can follow the more.. lower synthesizer. ^
  9. 00:27:681 (64,65,66,1) - dddk? and 00:28:816 (5,6,7,8) - kkkd? instead?
    1st, not fits on there with high pitch noise sounds imo .
    2nd, On the other side of synthesizer , it sounds and plays not well ...
    fixed

    :?: 00:32:059 - I really want to put on k … sounds the little splash… how about d? throbbing sound still same
  10. 00:41:870 - remove? not sounds well. blame backsound vocal lol
  11. 00:42:600 - splash sounds still slar. k sounds better? hmm.. i prefer d to emphasis crash sound at 00:42:438 -
  12. 01:02:059 (16,17,18) - change ¼ kkd? not sounds well over ¼ sound. fixed
  13. from 01:03:519 - part, Its a bit over working imo. It can make more nerf (lower frequency of ¼), consider again plz…
    removed some weak notes
  14. 01:24:600 - , 01:24:924 - add kd , 01:25:248 - change k? lol loll i think is better to leave empty to emphasis the stronger beat
  15. 01:36:843 - add d , 01:38:140 - add d? same as 1st. fixed
  16. 01:40:330 (2,3,4,1) - dddk? and 01:41:465 (2,3,4,5) - kkkd? fixed


    01:17:303 (19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45) - omg… dkdddkdddkddkkkddkkkddkkkddkkkd orz lol
    is hard, but still DTable for yumuya lol
I guess Inner Oni still can improve, call me back after improved the Inner (maybe...bout 1~2mods+.. and yourselfmod? lol)
Good luck (¦3[___]
thanks a lot JuDa~

will look for 1 additional mod on inner first selfmod instead ._.
JessiChan
Hihi o)7

d
k
D
K

Note: Remember that they are just tips, you apply them as you wish.

Note #2(?): You map very well, I'll do my best, but it's difficult. qwq

KANTAN!!


  1. 00:13:573 (12,13) - ctrl + g Sounds better (for me)(?
  2. 00:21:032 (28,29) - You can delete this two, for more space. < And if you apply this, change: 00:22:005 (30) - K
  3. 00:23:951 (32,33) - ctrl + g
  4. 00:33:681 (49) - K if you want. And same here: 00:38:870 (56) -
  5. 00:41:140 (61) - Delete for give more space. :3
  6. 00:47:951 (72) - d and 00:49:248 (73,74) - ctrl + g
  7. 01:01:897 (96) - Delete if you want uwu
  8. 01:26:546 (8) - Hmm... I think is better delete this, It sounds good but I think it would be somewhat confusing for these players.
  9. 01:29:140 (14) - Delete. The best thing in the Kantan is that the bosses do not exceed 3. But equally you can apply it as you wish.
  10. 01:32:708 (21,22,23,1,2) - Here if I think it is ok because it is at the end and then comes a small space (Is so you understand more or less what I want to refer :3)
  11. 01:36:600 (3,4) - ctrl + g

FUTSUU!!


  1. 00:13:248 (23) - Delete, maybe. qwq (for give more space)
  2. 00:16:330 (33) - d I think sound better.
  3. 00:18:438 (39) - Same, delete.
    This piece is mapped longer, maybe this way you would give some space. Similarly if you would not like it to be there, it may be in another section of this part or you simply do not delete anything.(? xDD
  4. 00:38:546 (99) - Delete and 00:41:303 (109) - Delete uwu
  5. Move this: 00:44:221 (116) - to here: 00:43:897 - 00:44:384 (117,118) - ctrl + g and 00:45:194 (120,121) - ctrl + g (Apply it for you to hear, if you do not like it just leave it as it is)
  6. And if you apply this ^ Then you do the same here: 00:48:600 (130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142) -
  7. 01:08:546 (193,194) - ctrl + g and same here: 01:12:438 (205,206) -
  8. 01:26:221 (11) - Delete, if you want.
  9. 01:28:654 (21) - ^ Same

MUZUKASHII!!


  1. 00:31:654 (111) - Whenever I see the Muzukashii players I notice that it costs them to make two triplets in a row (so they are the same color) I think it would be fine if you delete this note.
  2. 00:33:032 (2) - k I feel a sharp sound here, so I think a blue note would be better. You can just leave it as it is if you want.
  3. 00:36:438 (17,18) - Maybe ctrl + g
  4. 00:41:221 (41) - Delete for reasons already mentioned.
  5. 00:47:789 (68) - d I think sound better.
  6. 01:01:978 (46) - Delete.
  7. 01:08:384 (20,21,22) - ddd and 01:08:708 (23) - k So that the difference of tone can be heard compared to this: 01:05:789 (9,10,11,12,13,14) -
  8. And same: 01:12:276 (2,3,4,5) - Invert the colors ddd k
  9. 01:44:303 (61) - Delete

ONI!!


  1. 00:01:573 (2) - 00:04:167 (10) - and 00:06:762 (18) - d I think sound better. eve
  2. 00:36:843 (26,27) - ctrl + g


The rest of the diff seems fine. And the Inner is very good, I can not find anything. Good luck! :)
Topic Starter
Volta
"JessiChan"
Hihi o)7

d
k
D
K

Note: Remember that they are just tips, you apply them as you wish.

Note #2(?): You map very well, I'll do my best, but it's difficult. qwq

KANTAN!!


  1. 00:13:573 (12,13) - ctrl + g Sounds better (for me) that can work too, but i prefer to make 00:14:221 (13,14,15) - as kkd since it's more fit to the melody
  2. 00:21:032 (28,29) - You can delete this two, for more space. < And if you apply this, change: 00:22:005 (30) - K remain unchanged, because i want to raise the density before the finisher
  3. 00:23:951 (32,33) - ctrl + g same as 1st
  4. 00:33:681 (49) - K if you want. And same here: 00:38:870 (56) - hmm drum sound is still same so not changed
  5. 00:41:140 (61) - Delete for give more space. :3 same as before
  6. 00:47:951 (72) - d and 00:49:248 (73,74) - ctrl + g changed in alternative way
  7. 01:01:897 (96) - Delete if you want uwu i think it's fine
  8. 01:26:546 (8) - Hmm... I think is better delete this, It sounds good but I think it would be somewhat confusing for these players. i think is fine since it leads to last kiai
  9. 01:29:140 (14) - Delete. The best thing in the Kantan is that the bosses do not exceed 3. But equally you can apply it as you wish. is okay to have 5 plet, as long as it has sufficient rest moment
  10. 01:32:708 (21,22,23,1,2) - Here if I think it is ok because it is at the end and then comes a small space (Is so you understand more or less what I want to refer :3)
  11. 01:36:600 (3,4) - ctrl + g same as 1st

FUTSUU!!


  1. 00:13:248 (23) - Delete, maybe. qwq (for give more space) break is enough imo for a kiai
  2. 00:16:330 (33) - d I think sound better. fixed
  3. 00:18:438 (39) - Same, delete. same
    This piece is mapped longer, maybe this way you would give some space. Similarly if you would not like it to be there, it may be in another section of this part or you simply do not delete anything.(? xDD i put space differently for every section, basically when it is calm, the space will be more often, but if it is intense, like a kiai, there will be less space
  4. 00:38:546 (99) - Delete and 00:41:303 (109) - Delete uwu drum is getting intense here, so more density would help reflect it better
  5. Move this: 00:44:221 (116) - to here: 00:43:897 - 00:44:384 (117,118) - ctrl + g and 00:45:194 (120,121) - ctrl + g (Apply it for you to hear, if you do not like it just leave it as it is) hmm i think i prefer how it is sound currently
  6. And if you apply this ^ Then you do the same here: 00:48:600 (130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142) - ^
  7. 01:08:546 (193,194) - ctrl + g and same here: 01:12:438 (205,206) - drum is going up and then down, so current color suits better imo
  8. 01:26:221 (11) - Delete, if you want. remain unchanged for better spread
  9. 01:28:654 (21) - ^ Same want to make more dense for last kiai

MUZUKASHII!!


  1. 00:31:654 (111) - Whenever I see the Muzukashii players I notice that it costs them to make two triplets in a row (so they are the same color) I think it would be fine if you delete this note. it is fine, they will be able to do it after some practice. otherwise, it will be more hard for them to advance from muzu to oni. and it sounds weird if deleted the triplet here
  2. 00:33:032 (2) - k I feel a sharp sound here, so I think a blue note would be better. You can just leave it as it is if you want. if you notice i always end sequences with d at this session so not changed for consistency
  3. 00:36:438 (17,18) - Maybe ctrl + g i think is more suitable as it is since sound is oscillating
  4. 00:41:221 (41) - Delete for reasons already mentioned. same
  5. 00:47:789 (68) - d I think sound better. drum is same with previous kats so not change
  6. 01:01:978 (46) - Delete. nope
  7. 01:08:384 (20,21,22) - ddd and 01:08:708 (23) - k So that the difference of tone can be heard compared to this: 01:05:789 (9,10,11,12,13,14) - actually i more focused on ddk at 01:08:708 (23,24,25) - , like at 01:03:519 (1,2,3) - , 01:04:816 (5,6,7) - , etc. your suggestion is breaking the consistency so not changed
  8. And same: 01:12:276 (2,3,4,5) - Invert the colors ddd k ^
  9. 01:44:303 (61) - Delete keep

ONI!!


  1. 00:01:573 (2) - 00:04:167 (10) - and 00:06:762 (18) - d I think sound better. eve hmm want to make it more simple for the intro so not changed
  2. 00:36:843 (26,27) - ctrl + g is exactly same sound with 00:36:438 (22,23,24) -


The rest of the diff seems fine. And the Inner is very good, I can not find anything. Good luck! :)

thx~
Nishizumi
Hi Volta
as you requested me through chat, only inner oni

[INNER ONI!!]

  1. 00:06:762 - move to 00:06:600 - ? biar konsisten sama di 00:07:897
  2. 00:06:924 - ganti ke k kalo apply yg atas, biar konsisten juga
  3. 00:16:654 (111,112) - swap jadi d K biar konsisten sama di 00:11:627 - yang awalnya pake kat
  4. 0021:843 (16,17,18) - delete ? buat pembeda antara kiai sama non kiai. masa non kiai sama sulitnya di kiai akhir ?? (01:34:492 - )
  5. 00:27:032 (59,60,61) - swap color to ddk sama kek diatas, pitch di 00:27:194 - akhirannya di kat kek yg lu buat di awal kiai
  6. 00:28:005 (2,3,4) - kasih big note aja buat emphasis di sini, sounds better for single note
  7. 00:31:897 - kurangin volume hitsound di triplet ini, mungkin jadi 80%. kalo 90% gw ngerasa hitsound bukannya ngiringin lagu malah ketiban
  8. 00:33:032 (32,33,34,35,36,37) - sama kek diatas (00:34:330 (43,44,45,46,47,48) - 00:37:248 (68,69,70,71) - 00:41:627 (118,119,120,121,122,123) - )
  9. 00:40:492 - ganti jadi kat aja di sini, for better flows like kiai
  10. 00:42:600 - ga kasih break aja di sini ? also buat nekenin big note di 00:42:762
  11. 00:51:519 - personally gw lebih suka kddkkd dibanding kkkkkd, lebih bervariasi warnanya.
  12. 01:01:897 - same as above
  13. 01:05:627 - ganti ke don aja ? buat nekenin kat di quintuplet selanjutnya
  14. 01:19:248 - kurangin volume spinnernya ? mungkin jadi 70%
  15. 01:29:303 - kalo buat konsisten seharusnya akhiran 1/6 ini sih kat, mungkin ganti ke dddk atau kddk (kalo mau buat variasi) ?
  16. 01:34:654 - kok abis dari sini kesulitan notenya berkurang dari sebelumnya ? atau sama kesulitannya kek non kiai ? mungkin tambahin beberapa note buat mempersulit, buat klimaks lagunya juga
  17. 01:40:654 (2,3,4) - sama kaya 00:28:005
semoga membantu, good luck :)
Topic Starter
Volta

Nishizumi wrote:

Hi Volta
as you requested me through chat, only inner oni

[INNER ONI!!]

  1. 00:06:762 - move to 00:06:600 - ? biar konsisten sama di 00:07:897 kalo di 00:06:762 konsisten sama melodi di 00:06:762 , 00:04:167 - jadi no change
  2. 00:06:924 - ganti ke k kalo apply yg atas, biar konsisten juga ^
  3. 00:16:654 (111,112) - swap jadi d K biar konsisten sama di 00:11:627 - yang awalnya pake kat mempertimbangkan ada suara tinggi di 00:16:654 - rasanya lebih pas k D
  4. 0021:843 (16,17,18) - delete ? buat pembeda antara kiai sama non kiai. masa non kiai sama sulitnya di kiai akhir ?? (01:34:492 - ) sama-sama kiai kok, biar konsisten
  5. 00:27:032 (59,60,61) - swap color to ddk sama kek diatas, pitch di 00:27:194 - akhirannya di kat kek yg lu buat di awal kiai tp lebih pas pasang k di 00:27:032 - karna suara drum dan pitch tingginya
  6. 00:28:005 (2,3,4) - kasih big note aja buat emphasis di sini, sounds better for single note rasanya emphasis ke 00:29:465 - jadi berkurang kalo begitu
  7. 00:31:897 - kurangin volume hitsound di triplet ini, mungkin jadi 80%. kalo 90% gw ngerasa hitsound bukannya ngiringin lagu malah ketiban ok, diganti jadi 70% biar lebih kerasa perbedaannya
  8. 00:33:032 (32,33,34,35,36,37) - sama kek diatas (00:34:330 (43,44,45,46,47,48) - 00:37:248 (68,69,70,71) - 00:41:627 (118,119,120,121,122,123) - ) ok
  9. 00:40:492 - ganti jadi kat aja di sini, for better flows like kiai ok
  10. 00:42:600 - ga kasih break aja di sini ? also buat nekenin big note di 00:42:762 hmm rasanya lebih enak disambungin sama main melodynya
  11. 00:51:519 - personally gw lebih suka kddkkd dibanding kkkkkd, lebih bervariasi warnanya. gw juga lebih suka ternyata
  12. 01:01:897 - same as above fixed
  13. 01:05:627 - ganti ke don aja ? buat nekenin kat di quintuplet selanjutnya betul juga. di 01:10:816 - juga d
  14. 01:19:248 - kurangin volume spinnernya ? mungkin jadi 70% ok
  15. 01:29:303 - kalo buat konsisten seharusnya akhiran 1/6 ini sih kat, mungkin ganti ke dddk atau kddk (kalo mau buat variasi) ? kkkd lebih enak menurut gw karena alasan sebelumnya
  16. 01:34:654 - kok abis dari sini kesulitan notenya berkurang dari sebelumnya ? atau sama kesulitannya kek non kiai ? mungkin tambahin beberapa note buat mempersulit, buat klimaks lagunya juga hmm oke, dicoba
  17. 01:40:654 (2,3,4) - sama kaya 00:28:005 sama
semoga membantu, good luck :)
thnx shimizu
JUDYDANNY
Recheck.
[Spread]
  1. 01:04:816 - Either remove(Futsuu) or add(Kantan , Muzukashii) finish?
  2. 01:26:546 (8,9) - Eitehr unify?
    Kantan :arrow: K - d
    Futsuu, Muzukashii , Oni :arrow: k - D
    I think unified the k>D seems better for spread to make a consistent with 00:11:627 - .
[Futsuu]
  1. 01:21:681 - remove the finish? other diffs no appeared.
[Muzukashii]
  1. kindly, 00:29:465 - , 01:42:113 - remove the finisher seems better as Muzukashii player imo.
Call me back after you solved them (¦3[___]
Topic Starter
Volta

JUDYDANNY wrote:

Recheck.
[Spread]
  1. 01:04:816 - Either remove(Futsuu) or add(Kantan , Muzukashii) finish?
    :arrow: umm wrong timestamp? no finish in every diff there. maybe you mean 01:02:221 - , removed finish in futsuu

  2. 01:26:546 (8,9) - Eitehr unify?
    Kantan :arrow: K - d
    Futsuu, Muzukashii , Oni :arrow: k - D
    I think unified the k>D seems better for spread to make a consistent with 00:11:627 - .
    :arrow: changed to k-D + invert color of 01:27:843 (26,27,28) - in muzukashii (kdk --> dkd)

[Futsuu]
  1. 01:21:681 - remove the finish? other diffs no appeared. :arrow: fixed
[Muzukashii]
  1. kindly, 00:29:465 - , 01:42:113 - remove the finisher seems better as Muzukashii player imo. :arrow: i think no problem, to emphasis the 'GO!' shouting for mid~higher diffs
Call me back after you solved them (¦3[___]
:3
JUDYDANNY
Improved the set looks fine, nice. :D
Bubbled!
tasuke912
Merry Christmas

Qualified!
yuzu__rinrin
gratz! :3 good song~
Topic Starter
Volta
ayy thank you <3
Charlotte
gratz volta!
Nishizumi
wow 2fastandfurious
gratz anyway
iloveyou4ever
Just a little suggestion(I'd rather say it's a question...)

For Inner Oni,why don't change 01:25:248 (21,22,23,24,25) to finisher?
It seems that here are strong beats here and I think putting finishers here would emphasis the music more
altho I know after changing these notes to finisher,01:26:221 - will look strange(cuz it's only a normal note after five finishers)
but I still think changing those five notes to finisher seems better
Surono
dem boi xd

it seems the mapper have an own choice to filling finisher, where is needed finisher or not. I mean, entire of sounds like that doesn't need to be as finisher at all.

Nishizumi wrote:

wow 2fastandfurious
gratz anyway
meme yang ngeeeeeeeeeeeeenggggggggggg

gratz gratz panci cacad peyok!1!

Last edited by Surono on less than a minute ago, edited 1 time in total.
Davin Fortune

Surono wrote:

dem boi xd

it seems the mapper have a own choice to filling finisher, where is needed finisher or not. I mean, entire of sounds like that doesn't need to be as finisher at all.

Nishizumi wrote:

wow 2fastandfurious
gratz anyway
meme yang ngeeeeeeeeeeeeenggggggggggg

gratz gratz panci cacad peyok!1!
Cot sur :U
zigizigiefe
Gratz Volta/Flying Pan xD
Surono

Davin Fortune wrote:

Cot sur :U
bang sad!1!!! / brother nangis1!11
kouzuki_karen
late but grats
Please sign in to reply.

New reply