So I screwed it up with my english again? Arg, my bad as well.
And thanks for your feedback bananannian.
And thanks for your feedback bananannian.
DakeDekaane wrote:
Mapping is serious business.
whatNofool wrote:
HAHA some1 noticed, get rekt ozzy
> od7 < (✓)Nofool wrote:
Then you are clearly relying on your eye sight rather than actually listening to the songKuro wrote:
ok mom...
I honestly don't hear nor feel any difference between the current offset and +10 from that.
I tested the suggested offset in editor and still got over a 99% accuracy.
The only way I could hear any sort of difference was by slowing playback rate to 25% and even then it was still kinda iffy
If no one mentioned it could be possible that it is correct after all, that's not related that no one cares.abrian159 wrote:
It is non-sense how you all modders don't give a shit about the actual offset of a map and getting it qualified...
After testing a few times with OD10,Endaris wrote:
I would second that the offset is early rn but +10ms is clearly exaggerated.
I would favor 83 or 84 as the offset.
are you talking about me? i can't see the part where i yell at him or say his timing is shit :s i only told him my own opinion about his possibly too early offset. idk man we better make a drama about a difficulty name than a wrong offset in a RHYTHM GAME right ?Stefan wrote:
You could have just contacted any of the QAT to take care of this instead of yelling the mapper via twitter that their offset is shit
Well, you can't fix BPM online.Nofool wrote:
im not fag enough to call a QAT so he disqualify for some ms, they can fix that online zzzz but apparently you prefer them to disqualify so everyone can waste more time re-bubling etc...... awesome reasoning boyz