Nitrousdragon wrote:

FINALLY
MY TYPE OF MAP
MOD INCOMING TOMORROW

shurito1sao wrote:

hey m4m
why not start here a new combo 00:53:364 - and why here? 00:53:021 - <-- there starts a new beat the players have one red tick recovery. Fixed!
same here why not start here a new combo 02:10:335 - and yet you did it here 02:09:821 - I will keep this, because it fits better than the one above with the music. And also because of how it's stacked!
http://puu.sh/jMYWd/000de7b2e7.jpg i did it like this try it 02:34:849 - Fixed!
this jump 04:28:335 (1,2,3,4) - doesnt really fits the rhythm of the song try to do it something like http://puu.sh/jMZnz/15610af236.jpg Fixed!
same goes for this parat 05:09:477 (1,2,3,4) - the beat kinda feels like its going straight and back try this http://puu.sh/jMZzN/2a6ab62b4a.jpg I think it's a bad flow, so i keep mine.


Good luck with getting your map getting ranked i am your witness! Thanks!

[-Deemo-] wrote:

mod thing (real short):

[Mountain]

00:23:878 (3,5) - I dunno, it really bugs me how it's soooooooo close to each other lol (and they're going the same direction so it gets even more awkward to look at), maybe try blanketing 5 to the little curve at the start of 3 and make a P A N pattern they basically looks something like that since you already have the changing slider multiplier thing going for you .3. or something (this is mostly just opinion based btw) The flow of it is fine, and i don't see the awkwardness in it, since im almost always such sliders, and i don't really like that "P A N style" flow u just showed me. Im satisfied with just this lol, since it's my own style.
01:01:249 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - the way 1 just at an angle bugs me .3. I don't see the problem here ô.o, so im gonna keep it.
01:29:535 (3) - awkward lone slider art ;-; It's a blanket for (6), so it makes sense that i made it curvy.
02:45:478 (1,1,1,1,1,1,2,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - these slider shapes are real sexy gj Thanks! :3
02:53:707 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - maybe curve this part a bit more Fixed!
02:59:192 (1,2,3) - the gap made kinda just looks awk But it plays fine and flows well, and fits for this moment. It doesn't look awkward imo.
03:30:392 (1) - the shape is extremely sharp imo, so it looks awk It's a blanket for (4). The sliderend would point too high up if i made it curvy instead.

sorry for a short mod .3. No problem!

-Harpuia- wrote:

M4M~

[Mountains]
*HP=6? - I know it won't make a great difference, but... I think you get my point.Sure.
00:26:278 (4) - NC Fixed!
00:26:792 (1) - Remove NC Fits fine here imo.
00:27:649 (1) - NC? I made NC on the slider before too, so i don't want to make it like a NC-spam.
00:52:335 (4) - (Suggestion) Copy (3), {Ctrl + > + >} + distance No need to, i like this better.
01:03:992 (1) - (Suggestion) Put slightly farther. The jump will prefectly match the music imo. It's a pattern here, and i don't want to ruin it.
01:30:049 (4,5) - I find this stack a bit out of place. By that I mean I find it weird. Maybe you can unstack those two? It fits fine with the music imo, i don't really see the weird thing.
01:55:764 (5,6,1) - I find this awkward. I think you can convert the slider to notes or make two 1/4 sliders. This fits the best imo, and it's would be boring to make it 1/4
02:24:906 (1) - Remove NC. (Unecessary imo) A new "part" comes here, so it's necessary.
02:43:249 (2) - For sure one might think that this is at the blue tick. (Move (2) or remove NC at (1), add at (2)) This is a 5.5+ star map, and you can see at the AR if it's on a blue tick, because it goes faster there. But i might change it if someone other else point it out.
02:44:107 (7) - (Suggestion) Same as 01:03:992 (1) - hmm... Doesn't fit here imo, it fits more the other part, only because it was a jump, but i like it like this more.
02:37:249 (1,2) - (1) Remove NC | (2) NC The NC starts on the big white tick.
02:39:992 (1,2) - ^ Same as above.
03:51:135 (6,7) - I guess you can just make this a 1/4 slider since the pattern in that combo started that way. I'm mapping to the "streamy" sound, so it would sound bad if i made it 1/4
04:58:506 (1) - Remove NC Same as the other part.

Can't point out many things because the map is already fine to me.
Hope it helped.
Thanks for the mod! ^^

FCL wrote:

M4M from your queue

• [Diff]

1. AiMod Fixed!
2. 00:33:821 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this stream has nothing to do with music. It would be cool if you could explain why you decided to do so Delete it and hear if there's a sound in the music that can be mapped like this.
3. 01:11:535 (1,2,3,4) - better to avoid such overlap This overlap is not an issue to when you play, i would mostly avoid to overlap sliderheads with each other.
4. 01:36:564 (6,1) - This blanket can do better It's not supposed to be a blanket lol. It's just pointed to the left because of the flow.
5. 02:29:020 (1) - This slider can be extended to 02:30:307 I mapped to the piano, no the other instrument, so it sounds really bad.
6. 05:02:620 (1) - ^ Same as above.
7. 02:33:156 (1) -this is normal? nvm lol
8. 03:18:821 (2,3,4) - it's too big DS, imo I might change it.
9. 03:28:678 (1,2,3,4) - ^ Fits with the music imo.
10. 03:22:164 (5,1) - mb blanket? mb?
11. 04:43:935 (2,3,4,5,6) - can make those circles in the shape of a star? Well... i could, but i won't.. I will keep it in mind and might change it.
12. 04:46:164 (5) - new bit, NC maybe Fixed!

Good luck!

1. 00:17:364 (1,1) - This double spinner feels kind of jarring, there isn't enough change in the music to justify that first spinner so I think you should get rid of it. If you insist on keeping a spinner there though, then you could just merge the two spinners into one, plays better than having them separated into 2
2. 00:55:078 (1,2,3,4,5) - This stream has somewhat inconsistent spacing, some of the notes are touching each other and some of them aren't. Check each note and make sure that the distance between each one is the same; it would look and play better that way.
3. 00:59:707 (5,1) - You could adjust the shapes of these sliders so that they complement each other somehow eg. having them slider-blanket. I think it would look nicer that way.
4. 01:11:535 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I think it would be better if you made the shapes of these streams consistent. You'll notice that the first one is curved slightly, so if you made it straight it would look nicer. Alternatively, you could curve the second stream as well.
5. 02:39:478 (4,5,6) - I'm not too fond of this shape. Either make it an equilateral triangle or move (6) to x:364 y:268 so at least two of it's sides are equal in length. It would look nicer that way.
6. 02:51:992 (7,8) - I'm not fond of the hitsounds on these two sliders. Nothing in the music really changes to justify these, so it seems like they come out of nowhere. Keep the hitsounds the same as the ones on the previous sliders, it will sound nicer imo.
7. 02:59:192 (1,3) - You should keep these two sliders the same shape. For instance, you could make (3) a mirrored version of (1) so the pattern is symmetrical. I think it would look nicer than having two sliders that don't relate to each other whatsoever.
8. 03:32:107 (1,4) - If you look closely then you'll notice that these two sliders are not parallel. While only a small suggestion, I think it would look neater if they were parallel.
9. 03:34:507 (6,7) - Make these sliders go at the same angle. Unlike my previous suggestion, this can easily be noticed and I think it would look much neater if this was fixed.
10. 03:43:078 (1,2,3) - Not too sure what shape you're going for here, but make it a proper square where each side has the same length and angle.
11. 04:00:992 (1) - I think this spinner can easily be turned into a stream, considering that this is an X diff the players should have no problem with it, and they'll likely enjoy it more than a spinner.
12. 04:37:249 (4,5,6,7) - You can improve this shape by making sure each side is equal in length. I think it would look nicer and more organised.
13. 05:19:163 (1) - The sound of this spinner doesn't fit at all. Add green lines to make it so the spinner gradually gets quieter with the music, ending at 5%, so the sound at the end of the spinner is nearly silent. This would fit the music a lot better.

-Faded- wrote:

Hi, m4m from your queue!

[Mountain]

1. 00:17:364 (1,1) - This double spinner feels kind of jarring, there isn't enough change in the music to justify that first spinner so I think you should get rid of it. If you insist on keeping a spinner there though, then you could just merge the two spinners into one, plays better than having them separated into 2 I will keep two of 'em, but i changed something.
2. 00:55:078 (1,2,3,4,5) - This stream has somewhat inconsistent spacing, some of the notes are touching each other and some of them aren't. Check each note and make sure that the distance between each one is the same; it would look and play better that way. Fixed!
3. 00:59:707 (5,1) - You could adjust the shapes of these sliders so that they complement each other somehow eg. having them slider-blanket. I think it would look nicer that way. I don't agree, i think it's fine this.
4. 01:11:535 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I think it would be better if you made the shapes of these streams consistent. You'll notice that the first one is curved slightly, so if you made it straight it would look nicer. Alternatively, you could curve the second stream as well. Might change it if it gets pointed out again.
5. 02:39:478 (4,5,6) - I'm not too fond of this shape. Either make it an equilateral triangle or move (6) to x:364 y:268 so at least two of it's sides are equal in length. It would look nicer that way. The first two notes, is DS'ed, and then the 3rd is a small jump, and the 4 is a jump. If i did like you recommend, it would be a sudden big jump in a slow part.
6. 02:51:992 (7,8) - I'm not fond of the hitsounds on these two sliders. Nothing in the music really changes to justify these, so it seems like they come out of nowhere. Keep the hitsounds the same as the ones on the previous sliders, it will sound nicer imo. I added the hitsounds here because of the vocal, not the music. So it fits.
7. 02:59:192 (1,3) - You should keep these two sliders the same shape. For instance, you could make (3) a mirrored version of (1) so the pattern is symmetrical. I think it would look nicer than having two sliders that don't relate to each other whatsoever. I don't like copying sliders, like a pattern, so i will keep this, also i shouldn't keep it the same shape, i think it's better this way lol.
8. 03:32:107 (1,4) - If you look closely then you'll notice that these two sliders are not parallel. While only a small suggestion, I think it would look neater if they were parallel. Fixed!
9. 03:34:507 (6,7) - Make these sliders go at the same angle. Unlike my previous suggestion, this can easily be noticed and I think it would look much neater if this was fixed. It's supposed to be like this, or else the flow would be a bit off imo.
10. 03:43:078 (1,2,3) - Not too sure what shape you're going for here, but make it a proper square where each side has the same length and angle. Oh, im not making a square here, it just look like it.
11. 04:00:992 (1) - I think this spinner can easily be turned into a stream, considering that this is an X diff the players should have no problem with it, and they'll likely enjoy it more than a spinner. Fixed!
12. 04:37:249 (4,5,6,7) - You can improve this shape by making sure each side is equal in length. I think it would look nicer and more organised. What do you mean?
13. 05:19:163 (1) - The sound of this spinner doesn't fit at all. Add green lines to make it so the spinner gradually gets quieter with the music, ending at 5%, so the sound at the end of the spinner is nearly silent. This would fit the music a lot better. Fixed!

Overall, I think this map is good. You've used techniques such as streams all at the right times for a great playing experience, although I think the aesthetics could do with a bit of work. I shot a star, good luck!

Thanks!

-Tochi wrote:

04:37:249 (4,5,6,7) - You can improve this shape by making sure each side is equal in length. I think it would look nicer and more organised. What do you mean?

-Faded- wrote:

Now that I look back at it it the pattern seems fine. I'm not too sure if you fixed it anyway or if I was just being... odd. Thanks for the mod response though ^^

Dreamtwolf wrote:

Very fun map! Rank it please

Fuccho wrote:

Hello! M4M from your modding queue. Thank you for the mod. Here is mine:

Mountain

1. 00:25:249 (1,1) - These slider ends aren't snapped correctly. Fixed!
2. 00:28:335 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - The triples here seem a little too far from the sliders compared to how calm this part is. It feels out of place. I'd suggest that you should even cover half of the hit circles with the slider ends, like this: http://puu.sh/jWxtK/071a0fc0be.jpg Fixed!
3. 00:37:764 (1) - Would a hit finish fit on this slider head? Not imo.
4. 00:41:707 (3,4,5,6,7) - Extremely minor thing, but I'd like these more if they pointed inwards (ctrl + H and place them at the original spot). Just an aesthetics thing. The flow goes more to the right, so i think it fits here.
5. 00:47:878 (1) - Are you sure you don't want an 1/2 slider here? The rhythm in the vocals is very distinct. Yes, since i didn't follow the vocal.
6. 00:58:849 (1) - Here as well. Either way, this isn't even snapped correctly to begin with. Fixed!
7. 01:01:249 (1) - Not snapped correctly. Fixed!
8. 02:07:078 (1) - Not snapped correctly. Fixed!
   
9. 02:15:392 (1) - ... This freaking part. To start off, you can make this spinner end on the big white tick or maybe even. didn't notice, lol - Fixed!
10. 02:18:221 (1) - This slider should be like this (beat snap divisor set to 1/12): http://puu.sh/jWz6m/288d6e0344.jpg Fixed the whole part.
11. 02:18:678 (1) - This one just needs to be snapped to the 1/6 a bit to the right. The repeat slider seems good.
12. 02:19:935 (1,2) - For these two the timing is like this: http://puu.sh/jWzBN/2de5023005.jpg and for the new placement I recommend this: http://puu.sh/jWzGH/9a7e51210c.jpg
13. 02:20:792 (1) - Is good
14. 02:21:278 (1,1) - Should be like this: http://puu.sh/jWzZB/170fa51c69.jpg
15. 02:22:221 (1,1) - Are good, the second slider just needs to be snapped to the purple tick to the right.
16. 02:23:128 (2) - For this one, you can start it one the blue tick and repeat the slider once more.
17. 02:32:249 (1,1) - And at last, there are these two, which should be like this: http://puu.sh/jWAu5/936140532a.jpg
    I believe all this should give you the closest to perfect timing for this section.
    
18. 02:37:592 (2) - I don't recommend a 3/4 slider here. It feels out of place because there is a beat at 02:37:764 Fixed!
19. 02:40:335 (2) - ^ Fixed!
20. 02:46:507 (1) - Maybe move this a tiny bit to the left, so you get a little space between that and 02:46:849 (1) Ok
21. 02:51:992 (7,8) - I know another mod mentioned these, but I still think they sound off. The current hit sound is good, just keep it to only the slider heads. The voice is also at the sliderends, so it fits imo.
22. 03:03:307 (1,1,1) - I don't know if I like these 3/4 sliders, since you skip a strong 1/2 beat. It might be worth it to rethink these. Fixed!
23. 03:44:964 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - Ctrl + H. Like this: http://puu.sh/jWBr7/19d433eb2f.jpg I like it better like this.
24. 03:51:649 - I think it'd be nice with a hit sound for the snare drums in the coming section. Might do it.
25. 04:43:935 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - As mentioned, I think this would look great as a star pattern, or at least a more structured kind of pattern. Fixed!
26. 04:51:649 - If I'm correct, this part should be the exact same as the last, so you should be able to follow the previous instructions, or as it seems like you've done, copy and paste the entire thing. Fixed!

That should do it. Sorry about the wall of text, it's just the timing part that really fills it up. I hope I was to at least some help.
Thanks for the mod and good luck with the map!

Mountain

Hoen wrote:

Hi~

Mountain

1. 00:54:221 (6) - Try x:132 y:52 There's almost no difference, so i'll let it be
2. 01:06:735 (1) - x:270 y:334 Same as above.
3. 01:21:478 (1) - NC The NC will be too random, and meaningless.
4. 01:21:821 (1) - Delete NC I didn't fix the above.
5. 01:23:878 (3) - x:412 y:24 Fixed!
6. 01:25:249 (4) - x:144 y:68 I like it like it is.
7. 01:26:449 (3,4,5) - x:236 y:200 Same as above.
8. 01:40:849 (2) - x:290 y:145 ^
9. 01:54:564 (6) - x:256 y:328 ^
10. 01:56:107 (1) - Delete NC Fixed!
11. 01:56:449 (2) - Put NC Fixed!
12. 03:20:792 (6) - NC Fixed!
13. 03:36:049 (6) - x:264 y:68 I think the current position is fine.
14. 04:10:849 (2) - x:219 y:51 Same as above.
15. 04:11:363 (5) - x:220 y:132 Same as above ^

Gl~ Thanks!

Side wrote:

Hi for M4M :v

Mountain

01:56:021 (6) - Note would read better if you used .9x distance snap like you did 01:54:735 (1,2) - and 01:55:249 (3,4) - I think it's better like this because it fits the music better.

02:18:199 (1,1,1,1,2,1,1,1,1,1,2) - Pretty sure this section is mapped in 1/6 not 1/8 or 1/16 It's different some places, not always 1/6, so yeah.

02:31:763 (1,1,1) - Same as above Same.

02:51:992 (7,8) - Change to Auto sampleset. Fixed!

04:51:820 (1,1,1,1,2,1,1,1,1,1,2) - Same thing about the 1/6 Same.

05:05:363 (1,1,1) - ^ Same

Fun map. Good luck! Thanks!

Lumael wrote:

Hello! M4M on your queue.

[General]

• Timing:

1. BPM: Fine
2. Offset: Fine
   
   Folder:
3. BG: Current size is unrankeable, I have one to suggest you, quality is good and size is 1366x768, which is rankeable: http://puu.sh/kaxDO/b849fa8a95.jpg I like this current BG better, the one u suggested is too realistic for me. Fixed
4. HS: Uuh is this hit-normal, hit-whistle, hit-clap from your skin? Also why do you have two hitsounds which provide the same sound on the same custom sampleset? (clap and whistle) you should review your hs I did that on purpose, because this is a full hitsounded map, and there's parts where i have to use both. (not at same time)
5. LeadIn: Not needed It was already off, lol
   
   Other Stuff:
6. Combo Color: They are ok for the actual BG but as you'll have to change, they won't be so nice Didn't change BG.
7. Song Setup: Fine
8. General AiMod: Fine

[Mountain]

1. Well.. let's be creative on the diff name? .-.
2. HP 6 is way too little, 7 atleast please 7 HP is too high for a 5.8+ star marathon with many streams.
3. 00:55:764 (1) - Is there need of these 2 anchors here? It's making the shape a bit wierd Yes, i don't see the weird part of this, since i did it to make it look unique, and flowy.
4. 00:24:907 (1,1,1) - This spam of NC makes players die for HP and it's not necessary as well, you could remove at 00:24:907 (1,1) - and add at 00:24:564 (1) - Instead because its where the 1/4 pattern starts Naah, this is the start, no the end. Players won't die so easily at the start unless it's really hard. The start is where you start with full hp, so yeah...
5. 00:29:878 (4) - This circle need some more emphasis, increase the spacing to the prev. note here please Im mapping to the drums, and it fits good a it is here.
6. 00:32:707 (2) - This is overmapped, I couldn't hear anything on this blue tick with 25% playback I'll consider this, but imo it fits the song. I always overmap a little, and it's fine as long as it's not too weird.
7. 00:45:478 (4) - You need more spacing between this and the prev. note, this circle need to be emphasized as the Veela forces her voice a bit more here The jump here shouldn't be bigger since i follow the pattern. It would ruin the pattern if i make the jump bigger.
8. 00:48:564 (4) - This circle doesn't need that much spacing to the prev. note, there isn't anything special on the rhythm that indicates a jump here I would say that this is normal spacing, only a little jump and it plays fine here.
9. 00:51:307 (7) - ^ Same as above.
10. 00:53:535 (2) - ^ Same
11. 00:54:049 (5) - ^ Same
12. 00:58:849 (1) - Remove NC, no need here as the tone changes at 00:58:507 (1) - There SHOULD be a new NC here due to SV changes. Always NC at SV changes.
13. 01:19:592 (4) - This circle doesn't need to be emphasized that much, reduce spacing, maybe moving to 68|116 It's ruining the triangle, and it's kiai time, so it fits more.
14. 01:21:478 (7) - NC here? Combo is too long Fixed!
15. 01:31:249 (4) - I don't see a reason to making this note so far from the others, the rhythm is plain on this spot Because of the "dubstep-like" vocal, where the frequency is higher, so the jump should be bigger.
16. 01:52:335 (2,3) - Spacing is messed up here because 01:52:335 (2) - should get more emphasis than 01:52:507 (3) - which is the opposite atm Fixed!
17. 02:25:592 (2,3,4) - a 1/1 slider would follow this part much better, this is a bit "intense" for this part imo Fixed!
18. 02:27:649 (1) - This isn't following anything, really, why so many reverse arrows on 1/2 beat? There isn't anything to follow with that Fixed!
19. 02:28:335 (2,3,4) - 1/1 slider here as well, follows better imo Fixed!
20. 02:45:478 (1,1,1,1,1,1,2,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - Spamming NC isn't the point of mapping 1/4.. As i said before, there's should be NC on SV changes.
21. 03:30:135 (4) - uuuh this is too close to the HP bar Fixed!
22. 04:21:478 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - This star shape is very ugly, it could improve much more, go to Compose> Create Polygon circles and use it as base to your pattern Fixed!

The problems I could see here are the NC and the asthetic point, some patterns have excess of NC and some have NC where it doesn't make too much of sense. About asthetics, some overlaps were really weird while some were cool, I think you should take a detailed look to your patterns and be sincere, does this look neat or ugly?

Overall you could follow rhythm pretty well, some patterns shocked me because they were stunning. Good Luck! Thanks!

hent2222 wrote:

I love this beatmap \o3o/ Thanks!

-Tochi wrote:

Tehron wrote:

00:55:078 (1,2,3,4,5) - Even out the spacing. What do you mean? xD

Tehron wrote:

-Tochi wrote:

00:55:078 (1,2,3,4,5) - Even out the spacing. What do you mean? xD

Sorry to be so late but for me at the time they weren't equally spaced out, might've been a bug but it's fine now ^^ Good luck and I hope this will get qualified and ranked soon!

Default wrote:

Cool map

Misaaaaaaa wrote:

This map is amazing * ~ * How long do you think it'll take you to rank it?

Ikikaera wrote:

This map has to get ranked. It's one of the best maps I've ever played.
And I currently also have one of the best plays I've ever done on this map.

1. 00:24:564 (5,1,1) - looks quite messy, how about http://puu.sh/kHyMI/6c2ce1d8ed.jpg ?
2. 01:00:907 (1) - remove nc? it's not necessary imo
3. 01:25:421 (5,6,7,8,9) - it's quite overmapped
4. 01:28:677 (1) - remove nc?
5. 01:28:849 (2,1,2,3) - make this pattern like this? http://puu.sh/kHFKk/071e8a53fa.jpg
6. 01:41:621 (1,2) - now your pattern sounds weird because of ignoring the beat at 01:41:707 -, byw 01:42:135 (3) - has no beat. I recommend to change the pattern in this way: http://puu.sh/kHFS7/13178d035a.jpg
7. 01:46:507 (3) - here should be a nc, or 01:46:164 (1,3) - swap nc
8. 01:48:392 (1,2) - swap nc, the music told me.
9. 02:11:878 (1,2) - put the 1/4 sliders like http://puu.sh/kHG8I/4a39574a2a.jpg , the flow and playing can be better.
10. 02:29:020 (1) - why not extend a repeat?
11. 02:45:478 (1,1,1,1,1,1,2,1,1,1) - the nc spam is toooooo much, and the rhythm is not such special, 2 sliders with 1 nc is enough
12. 02:51:649 (5) - nc
13. 02:53:021 (5) - ^
14. 03:25:935 (7) - ^?
15. 04:15:221 (1,2,3,4) - same as 01:41:621 (1,2) -

Minakami Yuki wrote:

1. Just some complaints.
2. My personal suggestions.
3. Highly recommended.
4. Unrankable, you have to fix it.

Mountain

1. 00:24:564 (5,1,1) - looks quite messy, how about http://puu.sh/kHyMI/6c2ce1d8ed.jpg ? I like the flow more in mine, but i'll consider it.
2. 01:00:907 (1) - remove nc? it's not necessary imo Fixed!
3. 01:25:421 (5,6,7,8,9) - it's quite overmapped Fixed!
4. 01:28:677 (1) - remove nc? It's the start of kiai time, and on a big white tick D: I will remove when im sure..
5. 01:28:849 (2,1,2,3) - make this pattern like this? http://puu.sh/kHFKk/071e8a53fa.jpg I like this better.
6. 01:41:621 (1,2) - now your pattern sounds weird because of ignoring the beat at 01:41:707 -, byw 01:42:135 (3) - has no beat. I recommend to change the pattern in this way: http://puu.sh/kHFS7/13178d035a.jpg But i follow the vocal :c I will change when if you mention it again!
7. 01:46:507 (3) - here should be a nc, or 01:46:164 (1,3) - swap nc Fixed!
8. 01:48:392 (1,2) - swap nc, the music told me. Fixed!
9. 02:11:878 (1,2) - put the 1/4 sliders like http://puu.sh/kHG8I/4a39574a2a.jpg , the flow and playing can be better. Fixed!
10. 02:29:020 (1) - why not extend a repeat? Fixed!
11. 02:45:478 (1,1,1,1,1,1,2,1,1,1) - the nc spam is toooooo much, and the rhythm is not such special, 2 sliders with 1 nc is enough Fixed!
12. 02:51:649 (5) - nc Fixed!
13. 02:53:021 (5) - ^ Fixed!
14. 03:25:935 (7) - ^? Fixed!
15. 04:15:221 (1,2,3,4) - same as 01:41:621 (1,2) - :>

Quite a impressive map Thanks!
if you can find other one or two mods then you can call me to push it on Ok!

SpajdeR wrote:

Yes! Rank it, please! This map is amazing! <3 Thanks for the support man!

Kalibe wrote:

-Tochi ochi Hello :3

[General]

nothing.. wooow it's good

[Mountain]

00:29:107 (5,6) - move to x:344 y:228. It should be better to play this double : P I like it better when it's like how i did it
00:32:278 to 00:33:649 - I think there should be a SV change to x0,8 or x0,9 with 55 or 60% volume No need for it, since this plays good
00:52:678 (5) - maybe NC here? just suggestion :3 Fixed!
01:35:535 (1,2) - omg.. i love this pattern man Thanks xD
01:56:021 (6,7) - imo that spacing is too high I think it plays fine
02:06:735 (6,7,8,9) - maybe little curve this like that? : http://puu.sh/kLrfR/2ff6885f52.jpg I made it straight on purpose
02:07:935 (4,5,6) - don't stack it, but make it on 0,5x DS Uhh, i don't think that's necessary
02:08:964 (4,5,6) - ^ Same
02:09:135 (1) - and maybe NC it? Hmm, naah
02:18:221 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - <3 :D
02:29:878 and 02:30:135 - you have sounds here I didn't map to it because the volume is way too low there.
02:40:678 (3,4) - unexpected 3/4 on slowpart move it closer Fixed!
03:12:221 (4) - NC maybe? Nah
04:33:135 (3) - NC to make 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 NC pattern? Wat... I don't think that's how NC works xD
04:41:535 (5,6,7) - DS 0,5x No need to...
04:42:563 (4,5,6) - ^ Same as above
04:42:735 (6) - and NC It will be too random
05:03:249 - there's a sound 1/6 snap, 05:03:477 and 05:03:734 too so make slider here Same as alast part, i didn't map to it.

And, that's all. GL with that

Nice map, so i'll give you a gift :3
Thanks for the gift ^^

kiyumi wrote:

wtf this might be one of the best maps I've played all year
Thanks! OwO

Knotts wrote:

hi m4m from my queue

Mountain

1. Are there any other diff names you can think of? I think it's pretty lame to use the title of the song as a difficulty. Ahaha, well i can't so i just use "Mountain" because it fits more with the song, lol
2. 01:07:764 (7) - imo this would look better if you dragged it down a little. maybe around (147, 163) Uh, almost no difference but ok
3. 01:25:249 (4) - remove the drum sampleset from the tail Ok
4. 01:31:764 (1) - I think having this as two notes rather than a slider would be sound a lot nicer Fixed!
5. 01:32:621 (5,1) - easy blanket by moving (1) to (256, 184) if you wanted to Naah, i don't want to make the slider a blanket..
6. 01:59:535 (3) - move to (90, 67) to make it the spacing look more consistent Uhh, almost no difference..
7. 02:01:935 (1,3) - maybe make these parallel since 02:02:278 (2,4) are parallel Well, the flow is better like this.
8. 02:43:764 (5,6,7) - you should make this snappier to play instead of a curved line I like it this way.
9. 02:52:507 (2,3,4) - might as well get rid of their overlap Fixed!
10. 05:19:163 (1) - This spinners still spinning even when there's no music which might become a problem in the future Fixed!

Nice map

1. 00:41:707 (3,4,5,6,7) - the spacing can be somehow larger imo
2. 02:06:735 (6) - nc?
3. 01:41:621 (1,2,3,4) - 04:15:221 (1,2,3,4) - yep I still think it sounds weird

Minakami Yuki wrote:

~Recheck~

Mountain

1. 00:41:707 (3,4,5,6,7) - the spacing can be somehow larger imo Fixed!
2. 02:06:735 (6) - nc? Fixed!
3. 01:41:621 (1,2,3,4) - 04:15:221 (1,2,3,4) - yep I still think it sounds weird Fixed!

Thanks for the recheck! Fast reply

Kalibe wrote:

Go for it Tochi : D

Linada wrote:

itz hapuning ! gogo !

Tenderz wrote:

Although already bubbled, I still felt like I wanted to take a look at this map, since I like the song so much (yay, Veela)

[Mountain]
01:55:764 (5,6,7) - Don't like the gap here between the slider and the circle It's still playable, and i think it fits the song
02:31:763 (1) - Maybe lower the volume a bit more here 15% is enough
02:34:078 (1) - Too much spacing between this and the previous note, The music doesn't change pace much here Uh, i don't think that's a problem.
02:35:021 (2) - make these a little less spacing and softer angled to ease in this part, like this That's not necessary imo
02:54:392 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - This turn in the stream combined with the spacing increase makes it quite hard to hit, consider making the angle less sharp / keeping the spacing constant That's the part of the difficulty
02:56:448 (1) - Listening to this part with default skin, these hitnormal hitsounds sound a bit loud to me, maybe use a custom hitsound here with less of the high pitched sound the standard hitsound has. I don't think you should worry about that, but i will see
02:56:964 (4) - Needless and confusing slider as it doesn't follow anything in the music, make this a circle There's a sound for it.
03:01:935 (1,2,3,4) - This flows kind of weird imo I like it
In general I don't like these 1/4 slider->circle follow-ups as they kind of imply there could also be a tripple but that isn't always the case.
05:08:106 (1) - I think the part after this should be left unmapped and the map should end on this note, if neccesary find someone to edit the original end of the song in at this part or some other fade out. The song starting over here and mapping over the fade-out doesn't work and plays stupid imo. That would be too sad, cause it wouldn't be 5:00+ min draintime so it can't get Approved... And after such a long wait for it to get bubble it would be extreme to just do that and map other difficulties.

I hope this is still somewhat useful.
Good luck getting this approved.

Chaoslitz wrote:

[General]

1. Unsnapped green line: 04:02:621 Fixed!

[Mountain]

1. 00:28:678 (3,4) - Consider lowering the jump here, you don't need to emphasize this that much I will consider it, but i will keep it for now.
2. 00:37:764 (1,2) - Reversing in timeline make more sense with clickable object in downbeat 00:37:935 It feels weird and random to play, because i follow the piano in the other parts too.
3. 00:47:449 (6,1) - There is nothing need to be emphasized with a jump I will reduce it.
4. Please reduce the distance of this jump before kiai part to have a clearer difference with jumps in kiai time
   eg: 00:53:364 (1,2,3,4,5) - 00:56:107 (2,3,4,5,6) - Fixed the first jump you pointed out. The second one is not that meaningless since there has been a spaced stream before it, so it goes with the flow.
5. 00:55:078 (1,2,3,4,5) - I don't understand why you place spaced stream in non-kiai part, it should be similar with 00:54:392 (1,2,3,4,5) You can hear that the music ask for a bit more spaced streams since the sound i mapped to there gets higher and higher to the next downbeat.
6. 01:11:021 (3,4,5) - The jump here is weird with that sharp angle, you can just simply place 01:11:364 (5) under 01:10:164 (5) for a better flow The jump i made here is a zig-zag pattern, and it plays well imo.
7. 01:25:764 (7,1) - The music here is getting softer, so a jump here is not really suitable Fixed!
8. 01:26:621 (5,6) - ^, you can place 01:26:449 (3,4,5) higher Fixed!
9. 01:28:849 (2,1) - I don't really recommend you to stack this two, when 01:29:021 (1) can be emphasized with jump Fixed!
10. 01:41:364 - The finish here is not really needed as it will be too noisy if you used in 01:41:021 (3,1,1) It sounds too empty without the finish.
11. 01:46:164 (7) - I suggest you pointing this slider upward to follow the path of the jump 01:45:992 (6,7), you may need to reduce the spacing for a bit (like stacking 01:46:164 (7) at 01:44:792 (5) instead) Fixed!
    
    eg

    
12. 01:49:078 (5,1,2) - The kiai part is nearly the end and the music will become softer, so consider reducing jump 01:49:078 (5,1,2) Fixed!
13. 01:58:678 (8,1) - ^ Fixed!
14. 02:11:192 (1,2,3,4,5) - For this you can try to place something around x:340|y:208 for a better jump, of course you need to adjust the spacing of 1/4 sliders after then I don't think that it's necessary.
    
    eg

    
15. 02:29:021 (1) - As you are following piano here, the last reverse is not needed Ooops, mistake
16. 02:33:157 (1) - There is no sound at 02:33:499, so you don't need a reverse Yes true, but it feels better like this.
17. 02:54:735 (5) - NC for changes of spacing Fixed!
18. 02:56:964 (4,5) - 03:07:764 (2,3) - This two are not consistent Fixed!
19. 03:13:249 (3) - The red point is not necessary when the distance after that is short Fixed!
20. 03:16:335 (5) - Consider moving this a bit close for a better jump Fixed!
21. 03:18:821 (2,3,4) - It is overmapped Fixed!
22. 03:22:592 - ^ Fixed!
23. 03:27:049 (3,5) - ^ Fixed!
24. 03:30:221 (5) - You can unstack it because you already did in 03:29:878 (3) Fixed!
25. 04:14:964 (1) - Same as 01:41:364 Same
26. 04:38:278 (2) - 04:41:020 (2) - NC for SV change Fixed!
27. 05:06:756 (1) - Same as 02:33:157 (1) Same
28. 05:12:220 (1,2) - 05:14:277 (3,4) - 05:14:963 (5,6) - Jump is not needed I reduced them.

Call me back Ok

Quiesce wrote:

The bpm and offset are ever so slightly off.
BPM: 174.940
Offset: 216

-Tochi wrote:

Quiesce wrote:

The bpm and offset are ever so slightly off.
BPM: 174.940
Offset: 216

Delete Map > Download Map > Fixed!

Aka wrote:

i dont think so


i'd also like to mod it before this moves to qualified, if you dont mind
zz

Aka wrote:

i dont think so


i'd also like to mod it before this moves to qualified, if you dont mind
zz

Dreamtwolf wrote:

what updated today??? 12/5/15 or December the 5th

-Tochi wrote:

Dreamtwolf wrote:

what updated today??? 12/5/15 or December the 5th

What do you mean? I updated the day before December

Chaoslitz wrote:

What is this

Hinsvar wrote:

holy shit this is fun tbh

appleeaterx wrote:

Yes, full version!
Congrats :3

Exote wrote:

holyyyyyyy mai god congrats tochi, finally

Tenderz wrote:

eeey. congratz

FCL wrote:

tbh this map is good
You did it, gratz

Secretpipe wrote:

nice to see the full ver approved o/

1. 00:32:617 (2,3,4) -
2. 01:08:702 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - really overmapped, if you listen closely, you can hear that none of the blue tick notes are supported by the music, should be plain 1/2
3. 01:17:959 (2,3,4,5,6,7) -
4. 01:41:959 (3,4,5,6) -
5. 03:06:988 (3,4,5,6) -

1. 01:38:188 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1,1) -
2. 01:49:159 (1,2,3,4,5) -
3. 03:26:874 (2,3,4,5,6,7) -
4. 02:52:245 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) -

1. 00:22:759 (1,2,3,1) -
2. 00:51:902 (3,4) -
3. 01:33:045 (1,1,1,6) -
4. 02:59:102 (1,3) -

Hinsvar wrote:

did I just miss a massive amount of overmapping and bad patterns and

whoa I need to get shit done right
I think I'm ok with the DQ.

Feel free to poke me back (or not).

Secretpipe wrote:

I knew it ahah anyway ;_;

Secretpipe wrote:

gl for rerank

XeroiZi HD wrote:

1. 04:21:902 (2) - This object touches the HP Bar

Buretsu wrote:

hOi~
From my queue.
As I new in modding, i'll try my best.

You're map is really good, so I think it will be a short mod.

MOUNTAIN

02:03:559 (1,2,1,2) - I think it would be good, if you're increase space between this notes. The current pattern looks/plays better imo.

02:28:931 (1) - after this slider, add something like this http://puu.sh/m9YPV/6e4660c268.jpg I only mapped to the piano, so it will be kinda awkward to play D:

02:59:359 (2) - you really need note here? cause i don't hear any beat on this place. Fixed!

03:08:445 (6) - same. would be good if you just delete this note, and replace 03:08:359 (5) ? Fixed!

03:48:131 (6) - stack slider's start with 03:46:759 (5) The spacing will be too big.

04:27:731 (4) - stack with 04:26:530 (6) Fixed!


Not really big mod, cause I can't find something else, but I hope it was usefull.
Good luck. <3

1. 00:27:559 (2,4) - consider rotating 2 so it flows better into 3, 4 will have to be moved, ex: http://puu.sh/mbPA7/2ccc06f862.jpg
2. 01:56:188 - the gap is a bit out of place imo, how about placing a circle here for vocals?
3. 02:36:388 (3) - i don't hear anything in the music that supports this circle :C consider removing it
4. 02:40:588 (3) - same for this extended slider, no reason it needs to be extended, and it has a similar rhythm as 02:37:845 (3), which is only a 1/2 slider
5. 03:15:559 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - imo, since there are drums here and it's a new phrase in the music, this pattern should have a different design and pattern than 03:14:702 (4,5,6,7). Maybe you can start off with a small distance and then increase it? example in your map: 03:59:102 (5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1)
6. 03:18:302 (1) - consider changing this into a 1/3 repeating slider to fit the beats in the music
7. 03:23:788 (1,2) - make parallel since they are pretty close together? and consider NCing 2 to make the slider velocity change more obvious
8. 03:31:674 (1,1) - make parallel?
9. 03:39:131 (1) - how about starting the spinner at 03:39:645? that is where the singer says "oh", or maybe start it at 03:39:559, since that is where the wind-up sound starts to play

Raose wrote:

hello! o/

[Mountain]

1. 00:27:559 (2,4) - consider rotating 2 so it flows better into 3, 4 will have to be moved, ex: http://puu.sh/mbPA7/2ccc06f862.jpg I actually thinks it's better like it already is, it makes it more challenging and interesting flow.
2. 01:56:188 - the gap is a bit out of place imo, how about placing a circle here for vocals? I will consider this one.
3. 02:36:388 (3) - i don't hear anything in the music that supports this circle :C consider removing it
4. 02:40:588 (3) - same for this extended slider, no reason it needs to be extended, and it has a similar rhythm as 02:37:845 (3), which is only a 1/2 slider
5. 03:15:559 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - imo, since there are drums here and it's a new phrase in the music, this pattern should have a different design and pattern than 03:14:702 (4,5,6,7). Maybe you can start off with a small distance and then increase it? example in your map: 03:59:102 (5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1) I changed this part, to make it fit more
6. 03:18:302 (1) - consider changing this into a 1/3 repeating slider to fit the beats in the music
7. 03:23:788 (1,2) - make parallel since they are pretty close together? Looks better like this. and consider NCing 2 to make the slider velocity change more obvious
8. 03:31:674 (1,1) - make parallel? Same reason for the above.
9. 03:39:131 (1) - how about starting the spinner at 03:39:645? that is where the singer says "oh", or maybe start it at 03:39:559, since that is where the wind-up sound starts to play Kinda fixed it by mapping the whole thing.

hope my mod is helpful!!

Strategas wrote:

alright lets do this

[Veela <3]

00:22:759 (1) -kinda yuck, you can improve 00:23:274 (2,3) - blanket if you make them equaly distanced at blanket range. uh not sure how to explain lol This can't be fixed that well without changing the second slider, so i'll keep it.
00:24:817 (1,1,1) - this makes your whole beginning rather inconsistent as these are the only sliders you emphasize through velocity changes, though I don't find them to be that strong compared to the rest
now I looked at it again and found it even more weird that you only follow the vocals in the beginning. from 00:25:502 (1) - you start to finally follow the beat which imo you should do at the beginning aswell. Fixed!
00:25:502 (1,2,3) - so um you start this patern then suddenly switch to 00:26:188 (1,2) - 00:26:702 (1,2) - rather continue doing 00:25:502 (1,2,3) - with the slider and stacking thing, it will just make more sense and be more consistent and will make your patern structured and complete. The two parts are different, thats why i changed pattern.
00:27:559 (2) - then you can start new combo here after you change the above. also the only thing this slider achieves is asthetic thing, but flow wise you don't even follow it because of 00:27:902 (3) - It's to avoid the "too close" inconsistency, also i think the flow is just fine here.
00:28:759 (4,1) - kinda looks weird since it doesn't really blanket, but almost does it. and if you turn stacking on you'll see it's not so nice Better avoid making 1/2 sliders too curvy to fit with my style.
00:32:702 (3) - you could possibly make this into at 3/4 slider to follow the intrument there as you do with your other sliders I'll keep it like it is, because there's a sound on the first circle in the triple.
00:35:959 (2) - suddenly you change what you follow with the sliders, why? there's nothing on this beat that is so important unless I'm deaf. 00:36:817 (5) - 00:37:159 can use 1/4 slider here aswell. It's mostly to avoid the boring repeats, and i don't think it's much trouble. And for the other part to add, i follow the vocal, so it would be a bit random imo.
00:41:445 (2) - can try to make use of this slider be blanketed by the stream before Not really the big blanket master, but i like it like this when it's stacked.
00:41:959 (7) - move this 1 pixel left please now it really bugs me xd Fixed!
00:45:045 (2) - fits much better as slider to follow the wub whatever thing. Not really wub on this part, there's already plenty of 3/4 sliders. xD
00:45:902 (1) - slider looks off, rather use something like 00:47:788 (1) - Fixed!
00:49:845 (5,6) - 01:06:302 (2,3) - you know if you made these sliders at the same angle it would look much better atm 00:49:845 (5) - looks kinda crap lol, it's to make the flow better.
00:51:388 (1) - uh well slider end on strong beat. I know you follow the vocal, but can't ignore it As you said, following the vocal.
00:51:902 (3,4,5) - don't think these slider look that well together, try using another combination Wat, they look fine in my eyes.
00:56:359 (4) - 01:01:674 (3) - strange you emphasize this beat instead of 00:56:531 (5) - 01:02:017 (5) - considering this patern 00:59:274 (3) - is emphasized the most. also regarding 01:01:502 (2,3,6,7) - one of them you emphasize hard the other stack, Will consider this.
01:09:131 (2) - overmap Fixed!
01:11:445 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - these two bursts can be better emphasized if the second one is more spaced (or first one less) Fixed!
01:11:445 (1,1) - blanket off Fixed!
01:15:217 (4) - clap slider end Whistle slider end*
01:19:845 (6) - emhpasis and flow is destroyed on this drum beat with the stack Fits with the vocal.
01:28:245 (2,1) - blanket? Intentionally not.
01:31:331 (1) - meh just use the same shape as 01:30:302 (2) - Boring =.=
01:34:074 (1) - so here you increase sv, but 01:31:331 (1) - decrease uhh. The first one is more obvious in the music.
01:31:845 (2) - this is spaced so much for no reason Fixed a bit..
01:39:559 (1) - this one looks better than the rest of these type you used Thanks lol
01:40:931 (2,3) - these don't blanket that well Fixed!
01:42:044 (4,6) - I think I saw this in the dq but yea overmap Fixed!
01:42:302 (1,4,6,1) - blankets at different range don't look that appealing Still like it as it is.
01:54:388 (6,8) - more overmap Fixed!
01:56:188 - 01:58:931- kind of empty Fits with the music.
01:56:359 (1,2) - could try putting these objects elsewhere to make it less crowded there Will break the flow.
01:59:102 (2,3,4) - the 1/4 and 1/2 gap look almost the same, better make it more obvious Fixed!
02:01:845 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - not exactly sure what you follow here, but I think you can follow it in a more interesting way. same for the later part I follow the main beat.
02:34:759 (1,2,3) - I think you could use this patern more in this section Naah, don't need to ^^
02:47:102 (2) - random clap on slider end, you didn't use before or later Fixed!
03:03:217 (1) - there's a whistle on the whole slider Fixed!
03:08:188 (4,5,6,7) - emphasis is not very consistant Fixed!
03:19:331 (5) - nc if you do it here 03:20:702 (1) - Removed that NC.
03:50:702 - if I follow your logic correctly there should be a 1/4 slider here aswell Nope
04:21:559 (2) - this jump could be smaller for a better build up it's hand straining atm Fixed!

there's a lot of unnecessary overlaping, which makes a lot of paterns look too messy, too many tbh to point them out. I guess 90% of them are intentional to make it more interesting and challenging.

I can see you put a lot of work in this map and it's really fun, however these days map asthetics are more important than gameplay to rank a map, so make sure you fix those so people can enjoy playing your map when it's ranked. Also sorry for any gramatical mistakes or dumb sentences since I'm really sleepy lol. Good luck! Thanks!

Rameses B and Veela are the best couple btw xdxdxdxd

1. The beatmap is good, but I feel lots of problems with consistency in note placements, as this is a DnB marathon map, one of the main things that are REALLY important, is the aesthetics and looks of the map that must feel really clean and have a nice flow, which often feels wrong in this map for me (I'm NOT saying it's a bad map, it's an awesome map, I'm just emphasizing that it could be better), so the suggestions I'll give below aren't something like ''This is bad, change.'' but something more like ''I think this can be improved if you (insert comment here)'', So I hope this mod helps you <3

1. 00:22:759 (1,2,3) - I get the impression that this was supposed to be a blanket, but the shape of 1 doesn't really make any sense with 2 and the little overlap on 3 IMO is useless and bad because it doesn't even is balanced in his curve...so I highly suggest you adjust shape of 1 or 1 and 3.
   
2. 00:24:302 (4) - This could've been stacked on the start of 00:22:759 (1) - for more consistency in note placements. If you apply this, you could also rotate 00:24:817 (1) - -25° Clockwise with selection centre(and adjust next notes) so it doesn't touch previous location of 00:24:302 (4) - . OR you could also make his curve to the left, so this whole section have a cleaner look Like this for example
   
3. 00:30:645 (4) - If you place it somewhere like x:248 y:164, you have a much flow-friendly and cleaner look on this section, which also will have a cleaner and better motion of the jumps to 00:30:988 (1) - As you can clearly see here, and if you do that, you could also use the curve from 00:30:988 (1) - to blanket the note 4(of course you'll need to adjust its position slightly), making this shape less random and giving it more purpose to the whole pattern, AND that would also remove the location overlap with 00:31:502 (3) - that imo was random and little ugly >.<
   
4. 00:40:074 (5) - You could either stack this already with the tail from 00:39:217 (1) - or just place a bit higher the entire pattern, both would make it a bit more clean and structured
   
5. 00:41:188 (8,1) - This ending moment of stream, would look a bit more consistent if you place the stream in a position where these notes could stack with the previous location from 00:39:902 (4) - , in this case, minor adjustments from the previous pattern could do it easily
   
6. 00:41:445 (2) - place a bit more higher for a better blanket Like this?
   
7. 00:46:931 (5) - This makes the pattern look a bit messy because it overlaps too much with the locations from 00:47:445 (1,1) - and the blanket isn't right with 00:47:102 (6,7,8,9) - . So I would suggest you adjust the direction that 00:46:417 (3) - is facing, than place 00:46:759 (4,5) - in better positions where they don't seem messy
   
8. 00:47:445 (1,1) - Although I understand that 00:47:788 (1) - Makes a blanket with 00:48:474 (4) - . It looks messy because his tail makes we thing that it's blanketed with 00:47:102 (6,7,8,9) - , but it's not, and his shape constrasts with 00:47:445 (1) - which doesn't look good, so I highly suggest you adapt this >.<
   
9. 00:49:159 (3) - It overlaps a little the previous location from 00:48:302 (3) - and makes it look a bit messy, so I suggest you place this a bit more to the right or anywhere you feel like
   
10. 00:49:331 (4) - This would have a better flow and better look if you just stack ir already with 00:48:474 (4) -
    
11. 00:49:502 (1,2,3,4,5) - This could've been blanketed better with 00:48:988 (2) - , and I also suggest you place 00:48:645 (5) - a bit higher so it doesn't touch the position of the notes on the stream, will give a much a cleaner look
    
12. 00:50:017 (6) - Just an suggestion...what do you think if you make a slight curve in this so it will make a little blanket with the stream? Will not change a lot in gameplay, but will surely look more sexy. 00:49:845 (5) - Could also have a curve, but for the opposite side (the side where the stream is facing)
    
13. 00:50:188 (1) - You could either stack it with 00:49:331 (4) - or just place it more to the left for a cleaner look
    
14. 00:50:702 (3) - Why not just stack with any of the notes from the stream? making it more clean
    
15. 00:51:388 (1) - I know that you stacked his tail with the head of the other slider, but the strong curve that it forces on aim seems a bit way too forced imo. Maybe stack his head instead? will make a more open curve which is way more aim-friendly and also have a more constant DS. That would also remove the useless overlap of positions with 00:52:245 (4) - which makes it look kinda random
    
16. 00:52:245 (4) - Maybe just stack it already with 00:51:217 (6) - ? Would still have the same DS as 00:52:588 (5,6) - and would also look more polished
    
17. 00:53:274 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This looks really messy, a simple way of making it more clean is by repositioning 00:53:617 (3,4,6) - a bit , so it looks more polished Like this ?
    
18. 00:54:302 (1,2,3,4,5) - Again, for a better looking, you could place it more below so it doesn't overlaps with the previous position from 00:53:274 (1) - which also looks useless...You could make the stream start at x:80 y:228 for example
    
19. 00:57:217 (4) - move it just a bit to the left so it doesn't overlaps with the position of 00:56:188 (3) -
    
20. 00:57:731 (6) - The tail of this slider overlaps a lot with the positions from 00:56:874 (1,2,3) - which makes it look reallllyy messy and random...there are plenty of space available in the playfield, so strong and random overlaps like this makes it look really ugly and unpolished, which imo DnB maps (specially the long ones) must have at maximum, which is clean patterns and polished placements...One good way of solving this, is by positioning 00:57:731 (6,1) - more below and make the head of 1 stack with the old triplets Like this (ignore the single note 4 randomly placed in the corner xD) but that would require you to adjust the other notes, especially the note 4
    
21. 00:58:759 (1) - stack it's tail with the head of 00:58:074 (1) - already? his overlap is useless xD
    
22. 00:59:959 (1) - stack his tail with tail from 00:58:759 (1) - ?
    
23. 01:01:159 (1) - blanket his start with the stream? this pattern suggests an blanket, but there are no blankets
    
24. 01:05:445 (1) - Stack tail with 01:05:102 (4) - ? the little overlap will be gone and it will give more clean look
    
25. 01:08:874 (7,8) - Move both to the right for more clean look? Like this?
    
26. 01:09:902 (5) - Place a bit higher to remove the useless overlap with 01:09:045 (8) - ?
    
27. 01:10:931 (3,5) - adjust their positions to something Like this for more clean look? Tail from 5 is stacked with the single note 01:10:074 (6) - and 3 is placed just a bit more below
    
28. 01:12:131 (1,4) - Fix blanket