Left wrote:

M4M from your Queue! p/5154074#p5154074
first mod lol

[Shiawase]
00:37:986 (1,2,3,4) - DS should similar with 00:27:320 (1,2,3,4) - fixed
00:45:986 (1,2,3,4) - according to sound, DS should be lower than 00:44:320 (4,5,6) - alright
01:12:653 (1,2,3) - I can't understand why DS is increasing in here. how about this pattern? http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5218804 alright
01:23:986 (3) - vocal is high in here, so you can use more difficult pattern to show it. ( ex) 3circle ) done , 3 circles
01:24:986 (4,5) - vocal sound goes really high in here, so you should use more distance. how about this? It's actually better in flow than now. http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5218812 done
01:31:320 (1) - from here, I can't understand why you used lower DS than before. It's Kiai time. it's a kiai yes, but it's not that intense as the other kiais
01:44:653 (1,2,3) - I think it's a bit difficult considering other part. http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5218825 how about this? good idea
03:06:616 (2,3,4) - same.. http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5218832 same
03:22:283 (3,4,5) - I think it's not a point to stack. gonna make a variation at here but let's see other modders comment about it
04:09:616 (7) - NC aah
04:13:360 (4,5) - Blanket ook
04:15:026 (1,3) - ^ not on this one
04:20:360 (1,2) - I think DS 3.04 is not suitable in this part of the song. reduced

Good luck!

Plaudible wrote:

M4M from your queue! My map: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/504958

Happiness

• 
  00:27:320- to 00:47:986- honestly, I feel you could go easier with this part. It's really cute and simple. Look at: http://puu.sh/rDSqR/4e5a6b214f.png. Those first few bumps show that, even on such a simple intro, you really mapped it aggressively compared to other parts of the song. Tone it down! alright
  
  00:30:986 (2) - I don't suggest having this note. Just use 00:29:986 (1) and drag it out. Right now it hinders the overall song itself, since there's a hitsound playing with nothing there and it makes it awkward to play. You do it right at 00:33:653 (4). alright
  
  00:45:653 (6,4) - Awkward overlap, move apart. fixed
  
  00:46:653 (3,5) - Blanket these? Another awkward overlap. naah, I changed the slider
  
  IDK, up until here it's very lacking in structure. Consider using ctrl+shift+d and stuff to make things a little tidier, everything felt random.
  
  01:02:653 (2,3,4) - Triangle this! >:U Move 3 left. pkhg's
  
  01:04:653 (1) - ctrl h, ctrl j, ctrl g then move back? Flows better, no reason to break circular flow. pkhg's
  
  01:06:986 (5,2) - Stack these? pkhg's
  
  01:23:320 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I have a few gripes with this. First, 5 and 6 would be better as a slider IMO. The vocalist holds out the word here, why not make a slider to match? Also, the overlaps and stuff look awkward. This could work as a star pattern if you make it a slider. done
  
  01:30:653 (4,5,6,7,8,9) - Alright. Nooooooo. This is a high 2 star song and is completely unacceptable. If you look at http://puu.sh/rDSqR/4e5a6b214f.png again, you'll see that huge first spike is attributed to this. It is ridiculously increasing the star difficulty. I deleted the three spikes, and the maps star difficulty immediately dropped to 2.47. Use reverse slider spam or something, idk, but this is unacceptably difficult. I'll mention the other two when I get to them. I'm aware these types of 1/4 triples and stuff exist all throughout, but at least not these streams. Alright, Time to Gather more opinions
  
  04:37:693 (3,4,5,1) - Scootch it a bit so it doesn't overlap. pkhg's
  
  01:36:486 (4,1) - Doubles can be a hard concept for players who play these difficulties to grasp. Could you map this to be more readable? Like a slider stacked on before so it can transition more smoothly? pkhg's
  
  01:56:653 (4,5) - Big spacing increase with no justifying reason that I can see. pkhg's
  
  02:13:986 (1) - Lower hitsound volume here, it's really loud compared to the song. done
  
  02:13:986 (1,2,3,4) - Big spacing for such a mellow part? alright fixed
  
  02:22:107 (1,2) - I haven't done much with metronome resets, but these sound off. yes, I need another timing check at this part
  
  02:31:062 (5,1) - ^ ^
  
  02:37:353 (2) - This is not necessary. You don't really map the piano jingles at all. Just make 02:36:019 (1) - a long pretty slider until 02:40:353. alright
  
  03:16:283 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This increase in spacing doesn't make sense with the song. Their voices decrease in pitch and volume, but you make the jumps bigger? Maybe do the opposite: big to small. agreed
  
  03:26:283 (4,5,6,7,8,9) - Huge difficulty spike, not ok. it's... kinda ok
  
  03:47:616 (6,1) - Why is this so big? The 1/4 spacing from before is super small, this is a stretch. Bring it together. ookay
  
  04:02:283 (2,3,4) - Spacing inconsistency is not okay with any 1 to high 2 star difficulty, IMO. Be consistent - space them the same. pkhg's
  
  04:09:616 (1,2,3) - Overdone spacing for mellow part. nerfed
  
  04:07:616 (2,4) - Honestly, overlaps like this, if you do them, should be done consistently. The ones I see throughout the map are random and seem to be done in the moment when trying to figure out something neat. Apply similar methods throughout the whole song (hope this makes sense >_<;) alright stacked
  
  Beyond this, everything up until 04:32:026 (4), I believe the same thing as I said in the first suggestion applies.
  
  04:32:193 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This is INSANE. Biggest difficulty spike, this is something you see in an insane difficulty. In this star difficulty, you really can't be too varying with your spacing. You spaced your 1/4s in other parts of the map almost stacked, and here they are spaced like some of your singles?? I get the flow is simple, but this shouldn't be done like this. I get that the drums are intense, but it needs to reflect the difficulty you're making nevertheless. In a 2 star difficulty I suggest not mapping 1/4s at all if you can help it unless the BPM is low enough to allow it. alright , killed the 1/4 jump
  
  04:37:860 (4,5,1) - Awk overlap pkhg's
  
  04:45:360 (4,5) - Another random spacing for 1/4. Why not use a set DS for these? Better yet for the whole map, idk :/ err, okay?
  
  04:53:360 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - This is a bit tough, and though it doesn't seem to show up in modding assistant I really think this should be toned down too. Though you are mapping the rhythm properly, again, it doesn't reflect the SD well. This can apply to most of the streams in this section. mmh, I like this one
  
  05:49:943 (4,5,6) - Spacing doesn't indicate the timing here, it's shorter, making players click it too soon. You need to space it further compared to the rest to make sense. I'd just make 5 and 6 a slider personally, as is it's too difficult for a 2-3 star player to pick up on it should be readable now
  
  And again, maybe ease up on the ending on spacing, it's cute and soft, doesn't need to be as spaced as is.
  
  05:51:877 (1) - Beyond this, lower the volume, hitsounds are loud and obnoxious for the vocals. Reduce to 5%! done

It's a really cute song! Just patch up some of the rough spots and it should be good to go. Good luck!
also hi pkhg big fan

• [Happiness]

1. Check AiMod
2. 00:28:320 (4,1) - Overlap with the tail of sliders
3. 00:33:653 (4,5) - Imperfect blanket, fix this properly
4. 00:44:320 (4,5) - ^ This is inconsistent
5. 00:46:653 (3,5) - Fix this blanket.
6. 02:20:062 (2) - You can remove this and put two circles, it's cleaner.
7. 02:22:320 - You have a problem with your timing point, it's sound weird, you need to fix this.
8. 03:06:783 (3) - kinda overmapped, no beats in music at this point of time to support this circle, do something similar to what you did at 03:11:950 (2,3)
9. 03:40:283 (1,4) - No overlap? Should be better.
10. 03:58:116 (4,5,6,7) - Inconsistent spacing, the circle 7 is too away from the other.
11. 05:08:360 (1,1) - Imperfect blanket.
12. 05:39:276 (4,5) - ^

ShogunMoon wrote:

Hi!
NM from my Queue~

• [Happiness]

1. Check AiMod nothing wrong except false unsnapped stuff?
2. 00:28:320 (4,1) - Overlap with the tail of sliders alright stacked
3. 00:33:653 (4,5) - Imperfect blanket, fix this properly intentional, not aiming for blanket at here
4. 00:44:320 (4,5) - ^ This is inconsistent alright, fixed the ds issue
5. 00:46:653 (3,5) - Fix this blanket. not everything has to go blanket. but oh well, adjusted a bit
6. 02:20:062 (2) - You can remove this and put two circles, it's cleaner. sure
7. 02:22:320 - You have a problem with your timing point, it's sound weird, you need to fix this. yes
8. 03:06:783 (3) - kinda overmapped, no beats in music at this point of time to support this circle, do something similar to what you did at 03:11:950 (2,3) true enough
9. 03:40:283 (1,4) - No overlap? Should be better. i like this kind of overlap
10. 03:58:116 (4,5,6,7) - Inconsistent spacing, the circle 7 is too away from the other. done
11. 05:08:360 (1,1) - Imperfect blanket. there you go
12. 05:39:276 (4,5) - ^ naaah

Overall, your diff has little to no flow,so try to work on that. The note placements are weird and that is lacking aesthetics , you can be improved way more. Your tendency to add sliders and notes at random intervals mess up the timing. The diff probably need a remap tbh, they are rather inconsistent (too inconsistent for variety). Sorry for being harsh but that's my honest opinion. good opinion but sadly I disagree with this. Map is already fit enough to follow the music there'll be some unnoticed issues for us but hey That's what mod for!. Also probably avoid on stating "remap" easily if it just didn't fit your taste.

That's all for me!
GOOD LUCK!

1. During Kiais, you can add hitsounds.. Cause the song feels really really empty imo, without hitsounds..

1. 00:29:320 (5) : You seriously sould make a blanket with the slider at 00:29:986 (1)- ; It's not beautiful in the actual state, and it will be nice~
2. 00:32:320 (5) : Here, I recommand to stack this circle on the slider head of 00:33:653 (4)- ; Actually, it does an overlap that is not great imo, you can do better
3. 00:46:653 (3) : Maybe a blanket with 00:47:320 (5)- ?
4. 01:01:986 (1) : Maybe you can unstack it with 01:00:653 (4)- ; it's boring to do again the same road to click the slider, so, maybe you could move it a little bit ? Like this per exemple : http://puu.sh/s7mwA/89b1c97caf.jpg
5. 01:06:986 (5) : You should stack this circle with 01:07:986 (2)-
6. 01:30:653 (4,5,6,7,8,9) : This stream is way to long for an Hard difficulty imo. You seriously should replace it by some reverses sliders. Like that :http://puu.sh/s7mEU/a49938c5f3.jpg it's easier~
7. 02:18:016 (3,4,1) : Here, you should put slider heads like that > http://puu.sh/s7mO9/a55586f1fe.jpg cause it avoid the awful overlap imo~
8. 02:22:320 : I don't think timing is good, also, objects are very bad snapped, I think you should TiClick, pishifat or Bonsai, cause it makes me doubt.
9. 02:59:283 (4) : Here you should stack this circle with this slider 03:00:283 (1)-
10. 03:26:283 (4,5,6,7,8,9) : This stream is way to long for an Hard difficulty imo. You seriously should replace it by some reverses sliders. Like that :http://puu.sh/s7mEU/a49938c5f3.jpg it's easier~ Same than the last time then, I copied/pasted
11. 04:16:360 (3) : Stack this with 04:17:660 (6)-
12. Rest is good I think..

Imakuri wrote:

Hello~ Hi!
NM from my queue.

General

1. During Kiais, you can add hitsounds.. Cause the song feels really really empty imo, without hitsounds.. Right, I add whistles on the high cellos

Happiness

1. 00:29:320 (5) : You seriously sould make a blanket with the slider at 00:29:986 (1)- ; It's not beautiful in the actual state, and it will be nice~ It's the best blanket that I can make in this state. IF you have the better one feel free to send me to code
2. 00:32:320 (5) : Here, I recommand to stack this circle on the slider head of 00:33:653 (4)- ; Actually, it does an overlap that is not great imo, you can do better I like this kind of overlap actually, But yeah, this one looks kinda bad so I moved this to becoming a better overlap.
3. 00:46:653 (3) : Maybe a blanket with 00:47:320 (5)- ? Alright
4. 01:01:986 (1) : Maybe you can unstack it with 01:00:653 (4)- ; it's boring to do again the same road to click the slider, so, maybe you could move it a little bit ? Like this per exemple : http://puu.sh/s7mwA/89b1c97caf.jpg pkhg's
5. 01:06:986 (5) : You should stack this circle with 01:07:986 (2)- pkhg's
6. 01:30:653 (4,5,6,7,8,9) : This stream is way to long for an Hard difficulty imo. You seriously should replace it by some reverses sliders. Like that :http://puu.sh/s7mEU/a49938c5f3.jpg it's easier~ alright, changed into 1/6s
7. 02:18:016 (3,4,1) : Here, you should put slider heads like that > http://puu.sh/s7mO9/a55586f1fe.jpg cause it avoid the awful overlap imo~ alright
8. 02:22:320 : I don't think timing is good, also, objects are very bad snapped, I think you should TiClick, pishifat or Bonsai, cause it makes me doubt. will do
9. 02:59:283 (4) : Here you should stack this circle with this slider 03:00:283 (1)- pkhg's
10. 03:26:283 (4,5,6,7,8,9) : This stream is way to long for an Hard difficulty imo. You seriously should replace it by some reverses sliders. Like that :http://puu.sh/s7mEU/a49938c5f3.jpg it's easier~ Same than the last time then, I copied/pasted same
11. 04:16:360 (3) : Stack this with 04:17:660 (6)- sure
12. Rest is good I think..

I've done my mod then huhu~
Good luck for ranking ! Imakuri~

Net0 wrote:

Yo Ya!

[General]

1. Link for the official metadata; http://vgmdb.net/album/34363 just in case you guys want to add it in the description for a quick check of future modders.
   

I alredy noticed, Thanks anyway

[Happiness]

1. Distance got weird here 00:37:653 (6,1) -, it’s bigger while the song is like the same thing. It’s a different case here 00:48:320 (6,1) – when you have the introduction of the vocals. True, I changed all the similar parts too.
2. Instead of straight sliders 00:40:653 (1,2) – curve them like this http://puu.sh/s93MD.jpg this is the selected objects of the screen shot 00:39:986 (5,6,1,2,3) – this will improve structure and flow. Agree, Changed as you said
   
3. There’s a flow break here 00:57:653 (3,4) - . Make sure you intended to break flow here . Same thing here 01:00:320 (3,4) – also the distance got real big 01:00:653 (4,5,1) – while the song remains constant. pkhg's
4. This is a great emphatic choice here 01:09:986 (1,2,3) -, really good job. But I believe that from this point on 01:09:986 (1,2,3,4) – your hitsounding could be different from the start of the map. Probably just give the hitsounds here a different volume from the previous part to create at least a sense that the song got a bit more dense. I'm sorry I kinda not understand what are you trying to say. This part is already hitsounded and the volume also different from the last part. What else that you need me to do?
5. This idea of sharpened angle for the vocals is great 01:23:320 (1,2,3,4,5) – but you can improve visually how this looks. You’ll change the position of this 01:23:986 (3,4) -. 01:23:986 (3) – goes to x:111 y:243 and 01:24:320 (4) – to x:147 y:89 . You can improve even more by moving this 01:24:653 (5) – to x:186 y:243 they will fit into a more geometric idea. Lovely, Thank you
6. As a player and a mapper I aprove this 01:30:653 (4,5,6,7,8,9,1) -. I really like it. As a modder I must say that this spikes the difficulty of the tapping in such way that this is probably the most emphatic part of the map so far. Keep in mind that tapping more means giving more attention to that specific part, also, as a single diff map this is probably more acceptable in case someone points star rating. But again, this is just giving too much emphasis for such a transition wise sound. A kick sliders would work here as well. Waiting for the next kiai here 03:26:283 (4,5,6,7,8,9) – would be more beneficial to the introduction of the hitsounds on the second kiai as well. agree, changed both with the kicksliders using 1/6.
7. Why mapping a circle here 01:52:320 (4) – if the vocal sound 01:51:320 (3) - actually ends there? Feels weird at the moment to tap to that object. There’s like no vocals/beats to support that a lot. hmm, agree. Alright removed
8. You can improve polarity here 02:09:653 (2,3,1) - . My small change suggestion; 02:09:653 (2) – end this slider on this blue tick 02:10:153 - to make the transition to this 02:10:820 (3) – feels more natural by adding a 1/4 slider here 02:10:320 – .
   My real suggestion however is this; The vocal “ki” here 02:09:653 (2) – is ending on 02:10:153 – which gives it 1/4 gap “da” 02:10:320 - ~ 02:10:820 - and the next vocal line “su yo” starts here 02:10:986 - . Mapping this 02:10:820 (4) – as clickable is misleading imo. The clickable sounds are mainly the ki 02:09:653 – na 02:10:320 –su yo 02:10:986 -. I’d map all of them sliders giving it a 1/2 or 1/4 gap each depending on how you want this to flow. alright should be fixed now, Thanks for the proper explainitation
9. First overlaps 02:18:016 (3,4,1) – make sure you will make they have meaning otherwise don’t do it. done
10. Ctrol+G 03:08:949 (2) – for a better emphasis transition from this 03:08:949 (2) – to this 03:09:616 (3) – alright
11. You’re always doing vocal emphasis but here it seems you ignored it 03:16:283 (1) – to map a rather fast paced pattern. Do you really want to keep it that way or at least map a 1/1 slider here 03:16:283 (1) – instead? I'll change it into 1/1 to keep the enjoyment
12. 04:32:860 (3,4,5,6) – spaced stream. Interesting choice, I do see that the song supports it. But the way it is now is trully challenging. I don’t know if the idea is to increase difficulty as the song progresses but if it is, I don’t disagree with this. :D
13. This stack here 04:52:360 (1,2,3) – is hard to read and wasn’t used before. Stacking 1/4 on slider heads is mostly acceptable but on the ends it’s just insane diff range. true, I made a new pattern here
14. Flow break here as well 05:49:610 (3,4) – this part here should be a bit easier in terms of the pattern you chose to keep consistency of your previous choices.

yeap, changed

I love Rita vocals. This is a great song. Good luck guys, hopefully this will get ranked fast. I hope so

1. 02:20:232 (3,4) - both start on a 1/4, slider ends on 1/3
2. 02:21:539 (5) - 1/6
3. 02:22:050 (7,1) - This is what I split up into circle + slider, 1/12 > 1/4 where the red line now sits
4. 02:25:000 (1) - 1/12 since this vocal is delayed similarly to 02:22:050 (7) -
5. 02:26:444 (2) - 1/4 this is delayed another 1/12
6. 02:29:783 (3) - Ends on 1/3
7. 02:30:339 (4) - 1/6, ends on 1/3
8. 02:31:172 (5) - 1/12, ends on 1/3 however this plays very awkwardly at present since you miss the strong vocal on 02:31:894 - so I'd swap the order of these to go circle > slider
9. 02:31:672 (1) - 1/6, ends on 1/3
10. 02:32:228 (2) - 1/3
11. 02:32:562 (3) - 1/6
12. 02:33:172 (4,1) - The other circle > slider division, 1/12 for the circle, slider starts on the red line

136653,681.818181818182,4,2,1,20,1,0
142278,666.666666666667,4,2,1,20,1,0
149117,666.666666666667,4,2,1,20,1,0
153353,666.666666666667,4,2,1,20,1,0

Pentori wrote:

hello!
[Happiness]
00:27:986 (3,4) - 00:29:653 (6,1) - why dont you try giving strong piano notes like these more spacing? it makes them stand out and provides a different playing experience that makes the player feel these strong beats Actually I already did?
00:48:653 - having no hitsounds here in unacceptable imo. the section is pretty quiet, but thats how most of the song plays anyways. adding whistles to every 2nd beat would be the best option imo. 00:48:653 - 00:49:986 - 00:51:320 - 00:52:653 - 00:53:986 - etc. or you could hitsound to the background piano. its up to you alright
01:24:653 (5,6) - vocals raise volume here, this would be a nice place to put a small jump. though, currently 01:25:320 (6,1) - has more spacing than 01:24:653 (5,6) - so i dont think that jump is appropriate pkhg's
01:44:653 (1,2,3) - 01:33:986 (1,2,3) - you need to be consistent with how you do this imo. for one of them you skip over the blue tick vocal 01:35:153 - for the instruments, then later on you follow the vocal 01:45:820 (2) aight, adjusted to a new one
01:52:653 - try 2 beat whistle hitsounding here as well ya
02:04:820 - i would mute the slider end since 02:04:320 (3,4) - uses soft-sampleset there is nothing that sets the hitsounds apart compared to 01:18:653 (2,3) - where you have whistles for clickable things sure
02:09:653 (2,3,1) - ^ i also find the extended slider usage a little "random". if there are held vocals everywhere else, why did you decide choose to do 3 in a row here specifically? also skipping over the downbeat 02:11:320 - is not the best option since there is a pretty significant key change. http://puu.sh/tcAuP/390ee4f189.jpg thanks for the new rhtyhm
02:12:986 (5) - i cant hear anything here, make 02:12:653 (4) - a 1/2 slider? sure
02:16:653 - the section needs some more hitsounds done
02:21:084 - 02:21:425 - 02:22:107 - timing is sub-optimal. these sound more than 80ms early is it?
02:23:471 (2) - the vocals "impact" point sounds closer to the blue tick ya
02:32:450 (2,3,4) - these sound really off from what they should be following it's faint but i'm pretty sure it's following something
03:47:616 (6) - this follows the same pattern as 03:46:949 (3,4,5) - having a 1/4 reverse instead would be nice sure
04:02:283 (2,3,4) - i would keep the same spacing for a pattern like this. especially at this difficulty pkhg's
04:32:860 (3,4,5,6) - really big spacing.. at least in relation to the rest of the map. i would overlap these or sth naah, this one follows the music really well
05:20:833 (1) - seems a bit ridiculous to spin through all that noise past 05:26:000 - since it feels like the spinner is intended for the vocal. i would just end the spinner at 05:26:000 - and have a small break instead good thing
05:43:610 - hitsounds >< ya

well i think the timing in that middle section needs to be looked at again, as well as the addition of more hitsounds for feedback in calmer sections
you can poke me again when you've replied (:

Shurelia wrote:

Actually , we planned to do "something" on this map. 8)

Anyway, I'll check it later and edit this post when I finally went home.

Pentori wrote:

hello!
[Happiness]
01:24:653 (5,6) - vocals raise volume here, this would be a nice place to put a small jump. though, currently 01:25:320 (6,1) - has more spacing than 01:24:653 (5,6) - so i dont think that jump is appropriate pkhg's | shurelia pls thats yours not mine :p
04:02:283 (2,3,4) - i would keep the same spacing for a pattern like this. especially at this difficulty well this is mapped like a insane diff regardless sr
well i think the timing in that middle section needs to be looked at again, as well as the addition of more hitsounds for feedback in calmer sections
you can poke me again when you've replied (:

thanks thanks

I'll contact you again when pkhg's did something.

[TimingPoints]
139387,666.666666666667,4,2,1,20,1,0
140553,789.473684210526,4,2,1,20,1,0
141145,659.340659340659,4,2,1,20,1,0
142170,689.655172413793,4,2,1,20,1,0

Pentori wrote:

re

00:27:986 (3,4) - 00:29:653 (6,1) - by "more spacing" i mean something that can be felt while playing, 0.1-0.3x ds changes are not very significant. doesn't matter tho, this is quite minor aaah, so that's the one that you mean. alright then
00:48:653 - lower the volume of the whistles here, they should be more of a background thing than overriding the music. i found 20% worked quite well did 18% instead
01:44:653 (1,2,3) - 01:33:986 (1,2,3) - sorry but this still isn't consistent. try make the rhythms the similar. i recommend moving 01:45:820 (2) - to the white tick there

timing looks better, copy paste these to ur .osu under TimingPoints and resnap the stuff at 02:19:411

[TimingPoints]
139387,666.666666666667,4,2,1,20,1,0
140553,789.473684210526,4,2,1,20,1,0
141145,659.340659340659,4,2,1,20,1,0
142170,689.655172413793,4,2,1,20,1,0

Garden wrote:

i feel od6 is fairly enough for slow and calm songs like this, especially when it comes to tricky timing I actually feels like OD7 is decent enough cause if i'm trying to do od6 , I might feel like this thing going to be too easy.
01:45:986 - 02:27:687 - missing whistle? woops
02:04:820 - i wonder why only this extended slider volume is muted xd, feels inconsistent aight, aight. I muted 02:10:153 - too
03:00:283 (1,2,3) - 1,2 spacing feels unbalanced compared with other patterns this part pkhg's moved 2 onto 80|204
03:57:616 (3,4,5,6,7) - what about changing 03:58:283 (5) - to auto-clap, keep 2,4 clap pattern and 03:58:616 (7) - to drum-finish cuz drum here sounds lower-pitched, would sound nicer imo agree
04:32:026 (4) - add a whistle to this note? cuz u no longer have 04:16:360 (3,4,5,6) - etc. pattern to whistle on there i missed that
04:54:693 (10,11) - maybe drumfinish instead as i mentioned before ya
05:03:026 (1) - finish ya
05:57:116 (1) - consider whistle for 06:02:639 - the very last sound ya

1. 00:27:653 (2,3,4) - 00:32:986 (2,3,4) - Not sure if the spacing concept difference from 00:38:320 (2,3,4) - 00:43:653 (2,3,4) is intentional but gonna mention this just in case.
2. 00:35:320 (1,2,3) - 00:40:653 (1,2,3) - These too, the spacings in this section should be polished more imo if these things I mentioned so far aren't intended.
3. 00:53:986 (1,4) - These are overlapped but 00:54:986 (3,5) are stacked aaa triggered
4. 01:00:653 (4,5,1) - I don't understand why you have to repeat the flow or even stacking 01:00:653 (4,1) in the first place cuz this came out of nowhere and I'm curious whether this pattern is reflecting anything from the song.
5. 01:04:320 (6,1) - Should have a bigger spacing than 01:03:986 (5,6) considering how 01:05:653 (2,3) - 01:06:986 (5,1) - 01:08:320 (3,4) are spaced.
6. 01:04:653 (1) - 01:05:986 (3,4) - Could've used the same rhythm on these places tbh since vocal played repeatedly here so a repetitive rhythm would reflect that better.
7. 01:13:986 (3,4) - Kinda curious why you decided to make a 1/1 stack here.
8. 01:23:320 (1,2,3,4,5) - Not sure if the placements of these objects are meant to be a star but if yes then you should polish these.
9. 01:25:320 (6) - Personally a rhythm like 01:18:653 (2,3) would work better here cuz 01:25:986 should be clickable with obvious downbeat reasons.
   
   1. 01:26:320 (1,2,3) - Should be changed into sliders too if you applied the suggestion above cuz the rhythm here is not really different from 01:27:320 (4,5) so mapping sliders consistently would express the 1/1 piano sound better.
10. 01:58:986 - Should be clickable cuz vocal and 01:53:653 - 02:04:320 - 02:09:653 are clickable which has the same rhythm so not making 01:58:986 clickable is pretty much the odd one out regardless of who mapped this and other measures.
11. 03:17:616 (3,4) - Aren't these slider shapes supposed to be symmetric?
12. 04:27:026 (3,4,5) - Not sure if this back-and-forth stuff is intentional but the way you made it is emphasizing 04:27:693 (5) despite there's nothing on it zz
13. 05:03:026 (1,2) - Most of stacked stuff in this section are mapped with 1/4 so this could be misleading, should be something different than a stack to indicate the different snap here.
14. 05:35:270 (6,1) - Why the spacing here is so big compared to the rest in this section aa

Electroz wrote:

[Happiness]

1. 00:27:653 (2,3,4) - 00:32:986 (2,3,4) - Not sure if the spacing concept difference from 00:38:320 (2,3,4) - 00:43:653 (2,3,4) is intentional but gonna mention this just in case. It's intentional but these should still play pretty similar
2. 00:35:320 (1,2,3) - 00:40:653 (1,2,3) - These too, the spacings in this section should be polished more imo if these things I mentioned so far aren't intended. We planned to make things "Insane" like map so...
3. 00:53:986 (1,4) - These are overlapped but 00:54:986 (3,5) are stacked aaa triggered pkhg's
4. 01:00:653 (4,5,1) - I don't understand why you have to repeat the flow or even stacking 01:00:653 (4,1) in the first place cuz this came out of nowhere and I'm curious whether this pattern is reflecting anything from the song. pkhg's
5. 01:04:320 (6,1) - Should have a bigger spacing than 01:03:986 (5,6) considering how 01:05:653 (2,3) - 01:06:986 (5,1) - 01:08:320 (3,4) are spaced. pkhg's
6. 01:04:653 (1) - 01:05:986 (3,4) - Could've used the same rhythm on these places tbh since vocal played repeatedly here so a repetitive rhythm would reflect that better. pkhg's
7. 01:13:986 (3,4) - Kinda curious why you decided to make a 1/1 stack here. I like this stop-and-go movement also it play quite well with the song
8. 01:23:320 (1,2,3,4,5) - Not sure if the placements of these objects are meant to be a star but if yes then you should polish these. fixed
9. 01:25:320 (6) - Personally a rhythm like 01:18:653 (2,3) would work better here cuz 01:25:986 should be clickable with obvious downbeat reasons.
   
   1. 01:26:320 (1,2,3) - Should be changed into sliders too if you applied the suggestion above cuz the rhythm here is not really different from 01:27:320 (4,5) so mapping sliders consistently would express the 1/1 piano sound better.
   Did trying to use your suggestion but It plays kinda awkward for me, What I did to fix this downbeat is by shortening 01:25:320 (6) - into a 1/2 slider and add an object on the downbeat since I don't have any supports to map the blue tick at this one
10. 01:58:986 - Should be clickable cuz vocal and 01:53:653 - 02:04:320 - 02:09:653 are clickable which has the same rhythm so not making 01:58:986 clickable is pretty much the odd one out regardless of who mapped this and other measures. sure
11. 03:17:616 (3,4) - Aren't these slider shapes supposed to be symmetric? fix'd
12. 04:27:026 (3,4,5) - Not sure if this back-and-forth stuff is intentional but the way you made it is emphasizing 04:27:693 (5) despite there's nothing on it zz fix'd
13. 05:03:026 (1,2) - Most of stacked stuff in this section are mapped with 1/4 so this could be misleading, should be something different than a stack to indicate the different snap here. pkhg's
14. 05:35:270 (6,1) - Why the spacing here is so big compared to the rest in this section aa already being explained on the first line

Don't know about this tho, probably I'll have to recheck it one more time after this and I'll decide what to do.

Electroz wrote:

[Happiness]

[list]
[*]00:53:986 (1,4) - These are overlapped but 00:54:986 (3,5) are stacked aaa triggered so what
[*]01:00:653 (4,5,1) - I don't understand why you have to repeat the flow or even stacking 01:00:653 (4,1) in the first place cuz this came out of nowhere and I'm curious whether this pattern is reflecting anything from the song. isnt reflecting anything but isnt bad neither
[*]01:04:320 (6,1) - Should have a bigger spacing than 01:03:986 (5,6) considering how 01:05:653 (2,3) - 01:06:986 (5,1) - 01:08:320 (3,4) are spaced. should/b]
[*]01:04:653 (1) - 01:05:986 (3,4) - Could've used the same rhythm on these places tbh since vocal played repeatedly here so a repetitive rhythm would reflect that better. [b]would
[*]05:03:026 (1,2) - Most of stacked stuff in this section are mapped with 1/4 so this could be misleading, should be something different than a stack to indicate the different snap here. thats why 2 is a slider

1. 02:00:320 (5,1) - Could've used a bigger spacing like 02:10:986 (4,1) .
2. 04:32:026 (4,1,2) - Not really readable imo, the way you spaced 04:32:026 (4,1) and 04:32:193 (1,2) is really hard to predict in the first place despite having the same beat spacing, I would just go for a normal distance snapping here to make it more predictable, something like this.
3. 04:32:860 (3,4,5,6) - Doesn't play well as a build up imo, I mean this is the only place in the song where you used big spacings and they aren't really predictable considering how 1/2 objects were spaced on earlier parts in the song, stuff like 03:46:949 (3,4,5) - 04:54:360 (8,9,10,11) would be better in terms of readability.
4. 05:50:943 (5,6) - Could be misread as 1/2 stuff with no bpm changes like 05:48:943 (1,2,3) so either change 05:50:943 (5,6) into a slider or do something with the spacing so it's more noticeable with the bpm change, up to you.

Electroz wrote:

Recheck

[Happiness]

1. 02:00:320 (5,1) - Could've used a bigger spacing like 02:10:986 (4,1) . ya
2. 04:32:026 (4,1,2) - Not really readable imo, the way you spaced 04:32:026 (4,1) and 04:32:193 (1,2) is really hard to predict in the first place despite having the same beat spacing, I would just go for a normal distance snapping here to make it more predictable, something like this. ya
3. 04:32:860 (3,4,5,6) - Doesn't play well as a build up imo, I mean this is the only place in the song where you used big spacings and they aren't really predictable considering how 1/2 objects were spaced on earlier parts in the song, stuff like 03:46:949 (3,4,5) - 04:54:360 (8,9,10,11) would be better in terms of readability. nerfed a bit, I really want to follow the sudden intense that came from the song
4. 05:50:943 (5,6) - Could be misread as 1/2 stuff with no bpm changes like 05:48:943 (1,2,3) so either change 05:50:943 (5,6) into a slider or do something with the spacing so it's more noticeable with the bpm change, up to you. fair enough

Shurelia wrote:

paan seh ini nhak pb yg cuuops :V
maen bomb by 1 sne co op