there's still qwr's mod to reply to too xd
forum
Suzuki Konomi - Absolute Soul
posted
Total Posts
386
small mod because I can't listen to this song for more than 15 minutes before wanting to throw up in disgust
Light Insane
The changing spacing in this diff is really what kills this. Either put the effort in to fix it or remap, otherwise:
BLANKETS: 00:18:264 (1,3) - 00:32:786 (2,3) - (ALL OF THIS: 00:54:807 (4,1,2,3,4) - ) 00:56:881 (2,3) -
00:23:850 (4) - Literally no reason for this to have a sharp curve
00:39:169 (4) - Move to x:196, y:164
Absolute Duo
00:09:647 (4,5) - Sounds awkward when in the forefront of the music is one continuous note, and this is mapping to the drums in the background, unlike anything else in the song. Pls change to one big slider.
00:51:137 (2) - This note positioned here makes 00:50:977 (1,2,3) - look awkward as shit
00:54:328 (2) - x:232, y:276 is a more consistent blanket for the next section of notes
01:14:435 (3) - Try x:272, y:148 :^)
01:16:669 (1,2,3,4,5) - This whole pattern is inconsistent and plays super awkward because of it
01:18:264 (2,3,4,5) - ^
E P I C
M E E M Z
Light Insane
The changing spacing in this diff is really what kills this. Either put the effort in to fix it or remap, otherwise:
BLANKETS: 00:18:264 (1,3) - 00:32:786 (2,3) - (ALL OF THIS: 00:54:807 (4,1,2,3,4) - ) 00:56:881 (2,3) -
00:23:850 (4) - Literally no reason for this to have a sharp curve
00:39:169 (4) - Move to x:196, y:164
Absolute Duo
00:09:647 (4,5) - Sounds awkward when in the forefront of the music is one continuous note, and this is mapping to the drums in the background, unlike anything else in the song. Pls change to one big slider.
00:51:137 (2) - This note positioned here makes 00:50:977 (1,2,3) - look awkward as shit
00:54:328 (2) - x:232, y:276 is a more consistent blanket for the next section of notes
01:14:435 (3) - Try x:272, y:148 :^)
01:16:669 (1,2,3,4,5) - This whole pattern is inconsistent and plays super awkward because of it
01:18:264 (2,3,4,5) - ^
E P I C
M E E M Z
Topic Starter
Anxient wrote:
this isn't going to be fun. remember that this is all my opinion.easyfuckdickyousuck
as a whole i would remap this because i think that this easy diff is too clustered, as in, the spacing between diffs is too low. if youre going to remap this, alter the DS to a point where the follow point would be visible. Literally every easy ever
00:01:509 (3) - copy slider from 00:00:233 (1) - to show relation. These are similar parts so you wanna make them look related. No
00:03:424 (2) - get rid of red tick, its unecessary. What drugs there is no redtick
00:16:190 (1,2) - blanket Done
00:20:977 (3) - make into a 1/1 slider Would make density too high
00:23:850 (2,3,4) - theres a term i like to use which is called slider entry and slider exit. Basically if there is stuff like http://puu.sh/m3Dtg/88d8e19e43.jpg, i would like to have it fixed by doing [url][http://puu.sh/m3Duu/589d62cebd.jpg/url]. see the pattern? yeah you know what to fix. If there are any questions regarding this, feel free to forum pm me. btw theres a reason why i hl'd 2 as well. Pleaseshortenicantseejackshitin notepad
00:26:403 (4,5,1) - what is this spacing on easy lol Wotm8
00:28:318 (1,2,3) - try to keep a consistent rhythm hmm? this is an easy diff. No
00:33:424 (1,2,3) - make 3 the same position as 1 and 2. basically if you turn 3 into a slider to stream with 1/1 distance and you get 1 and 2, you already fixed it. if you didnt understand, just rotate it by 13 degrees.
00:37:254 (2) - red tick unnecessary. Whatredtick
00:39:169 (4,1,2,3) - blanket pls It already is
01:03:903 - to end, justified to my claim on the beginning of the easy diff mod, the low spacing causes this map to feel and appear unbearably clustered; something that we do not want in 2015 and the upcoming year of 2016. If this were to get ranked, you would need to time warp up to 2012. Even then its not a guarantee.SPOILER###yousuck go look at at every other goddamn absolute soul
verdict for this diff: unrankable, because of issues mentioned above, clustered all the way to hell and inconsistent rhythm.normal
this one no longer has the spacing problem. but there are some notes that brush way too close to the other notes, making it seem clustered. spacing these notes would help. also with the easy diff, remap is recommended.
00:06:296 (3) - ctrl h and reposition Watno
00:09:488 (5,1) - example of notes that brush way too close Then why do overlaps exist
00:13:318 (2,5) - blanket this. looks good too. No
on normal diffs i tend to avoid to use two circles in a row because of the lack of patterning that is allowed to do with 2 circles in normal diffs. that being said...
00:15:552 (1,2) - change to slider. i recommend using 5 and ctrl h+j+g and reposition Slider doesnt fit
00:16:828 (4,5) - slider entry is bad, please fix. Deal with it
00:23:371 (1) - 00:23:211 - place here, and reposition so that distance isnt broken No vocals
00:26:881 (3) - flip this thing around http://puu.sh/m3Ebu/93223c0ca6.jpg No
00:33:424 - rhythm gets a bit confusing. use easier to pick up rhythm please. Its already easy
00:36:615 (2,1,2) - this is a bit hard to read in normal diffs imho You can literally see the start and repeat points
00:43:637 (1) - woah this looks ugly. try making some shapes and ask modhelp what they think. make an omega symbol? thats always a good thing. I should make a shape of your d/color]
00:47:467 (3) - this looks out of place.
00:49:701 (3) - flip this around. using the same slider curve position twice really isnt screaming quality for you. Quality is subjective triggered
00:51:296 (1) - flip around. part links from the previous to the next, so yea How about no
00:51:296 (1,2,3) - just do this http://puu.sh/m3El5/3e7fcbe86e.jpg it looks way better. fix any spacing problems that may arise from this.
00:53:211 (4,2) - overlap "overlap"
01:09:009 (4,2) - too curvy, make it wider so that blanket is more visible Great now you should start complaining about those chinese supertight slider curves
01:15:552 (3,2) - alter 2 (rotate in a way that 3 would be able to sliderblanket 2) Too clustered
01:16:669 (2,3) - slider entry, rotate 3 to fix (-89 degrees) also put it more up (339:184) No
01:17:467 (3,4,5) - doesnt this look bad to you? do something like this. or do this http://puu.sh/m3EFl/16adf89e9c.jpg. Itll make it look better. No
01:24:647 (1,2,1) - i dont understand this overlapping. please dont. Welcome to distance snapping dicks
verdict: unrankable, because of lack of overall quality as well as some really bad overlapping and brushing of notes. Honestly if you tried to rank this then youre going to have a really bad time. As a normal diff, this map fails. Remap is recommended. and if you do, please use more spacing and avoid overlapping like the PLAGUE. dickslight insane
aah the root of all this map's problems. Lets see whats wrong with this.
00:00:233 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2) - well this looks extremely stiff. Listen. if youre gonna map an insane, or light insane i dont care, map it like an insane. It is an insane
00:02:307 (2,1,2) - 00:03:424 - white tick on slider end = NONONONONO My head hurts
00:03:105 (2) - rotate 2 so that it blankets 00:03:584 (3) - doing this also fixes slider entry issue No
00:04:860 (3,1) - slider blanket please Already is
00:05:658 (2) - make it curve, i dont understand why its a straight slider. doesnt look nice. No
00:06:456 (1) - strong beat in a slider end? please no Hi guitars
00:09:647 (3) - ctrl h+g and blanket slider end of 3 with 2. 00:09:967 (3,1) - slider entry = check and 00:09:169 (1,2,3) - circle flow = check. No
00:14:115 (1) - whats with you and slider ends on white ticks? :< what are vocals
00:14:594 (3,4,5) - http://puu.sh/m3Gta/bdafce02bc.jpg to improve slider entry and overall flow. No
00:16:190 (1) - ctrl g for better flow and emphasis. No
00:16:669 (3) - slider end on white tick Hi vocals
00:18:105 (9,1) - i dont understand this placement? try doing http://puu.sh/m3GBZ/6ba7e850f4.jpg this. it helps with visual and flow. Hi jumps
00:20:977 (3) - ctrl g to improve flow. and because of that 1/1 break time it doesnt matter about the flow to the next note. You forgot to check your own OH MY GOD SLIDER ENTRY
00:24:328 (1) - slider end white tick??? Hi vocals
00:25:445 (5) - ctrl g, turn this to a 1/2 slider, make it repeat. How much drugs, its still completely fine as a 1/1
00:38:690 (1,2,3,4) - make it a proper square pls. use polygon objects. Hi diamond shapes
00:41:084 (3,2) - blanket?? Blankets are overated
00:43:637 (4) - might wanna use a higher DS to emphasize the new part of the song You do realize 4 is a different ds from 1,2,3
00:46:190 (4) - i vote ctrl g to keep flow. flow break is something we dont need rn doesnt match
00:45:552 (3,5) - try to relocate 5 so that it can slider blanket 3. make sure 3 starts on the bottom so we get that flow. fix any note inconsisencies. It was already blanketed from the start
00:53:052 (3,4,5,6) - i dont understand this antijumps. people might mistake for doubles and triples. at least make em a slider? No
00:53:850 - onwards dammit DS too low What are you expecting? DS 5x?
00:57:520 (4) - slider end white tick hue Hi vocals
01:03:424 (1,2) - use slider unless you use two hitcircles for emphasis? Gee I wonder what I wanted to do
01:05:818 (3) - use a curve lol why is this jagged Variety
01:06:456 (1,2,3,4) - this is random lol. did you decide to put a random pattern here? At least it's just a mirror of itself
01:07:733 (1) - if youre gonna keep it at least make the transition to this flow better. ctrl g actually helps No
01:08:211 (2) - blanket with 1. helps with flow to 3 and emphasis with vocals. TFW you talk about flow but you start screaming about slider entrys
01:10:764 (2,3) - blanket? Why would I even blanket something again
01:12:839 (4) - NC lol Hi vocal ncing
01:12:998 (1) - continue combo
01:13:956 (1) - ^
01:14:115 (2) - NC
01:19:222 (1,2,3) - i dont understand the fancy sliders.
01:20:498 (1) - WHY. did you get lazy or something?!
01:20:498 (1,1) - slider blanket. or fix it so it doesnt look like shit if you decide to remap 01:20:498 (1) - this... THING.
01:25:605 (1,4) - dont make them touch pls
verdict: this diff has CLEARLY gone through alot of polishing. But still unrankable. well, it IS rankable, but certainly not recommended, mostly due to that thing near the end and visual and flow issues. Even though this diff has gone through alot of polishing, if its bad to begin with, it will always be bad. remap is recommended, coz your mapping style MUSTVE changed in the course of one year. (in the case in which it didnt, youre fucked.)insane
well this diff isnt so bad! My head hurts from people not reading who made this
00:09:488 (3,4) - slider entry fix Enter your eyes
00:11:562 (1) - you were going with cross jumps so position this in a way where it will cross again in the resulting jump. well better if you just did this:
00:11:562 (1) - 411:238
00:11:881 (2) - 210:265
00:12:201 (3,1) - lol if youre really going to do this then at LEAST stack them properly Its already stacked
00:14:594 (3) - dont do a flow break here bro still the same song part Plays fine
00:16:669 (1) - slider end on white?? Vocals
00:17:147 (3,4,5) - this is triggering me so hard right now. slider entry fix pls Your very existence is triggering me
00:20:179 (5) - better to do a 3 hit jump actually... make a triangle or something N 0
00:21:775 (1) - ctrl g for emphasis N 0 , if this was ctrlg'd from the start you would be raging about slider fucking entry
00:22:094 (2) - ^N 0 , if this was ctrlg'd from the start you would be raging about slider fucking entry
00:22:094 (3) - ^ and so 00:22:733 (4) - this gets the emphasis it deserves What the hell you just used 00:22:094 twice
00:23:131 (5,1) - just do auto stack Autostack is garbage
00:24:169 (6) - turn this into a 1/2 slider Causes conflicts pls look at what is there
00:24:328 (1) - if ^ is applied, 00:24:488 - hitcircle No
00:26:881 (1) - i dont understand why you keep doing this I dont know why you're so butthurt over vocals
00:27:360 (3) - ctrl g coz flowbreak isnt necessary here rn No
00:27:679 (4) - move to 135:144 for flow if ^ mod is used No
00:26:881 (1) - 2 hitcircles. made for jumping pls You just went back in time and reused the same goddamn time
00:29:435 (1) - NGAAAAAAAAAAH turn to a 3 hit jump pls No hi vocals
00:45:552 (3) - lyrics are very prominent here. turn to a 1/1 slider. Unneeded
00:50:658 (2,3,4,5,6) - holy shit this looks terrible. do this instead http://puu.sh/m3ItL/9af9765b34.jpg No
01:01:669 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - might wanna make a jump without flow breaks thanks No
01:03:584 - missing note No, 1/2 after a spinner is just weird since "kimi" arent both pressed
01:04:860 (5) - place in 422:171 for pattern consistency and 01:05:179 (1) - flow improvement No
01:05:179 (1,2) - you missed the opportunity to add a blanket Screw your blankets
01:13:956 - missing note. maybe stack it with 1? Polarity
01:15:552 - 01:15:233 (5) - copy this slider, ctrl h+j+g and place in 01:14:913 (4) - slider end. BOOM flow improvement. No
01:15:552 (6,1,2) - overmap No
01:25:605 (1) - lol just make it a hitcircle. No
01:26:881 (1) - ctrl g and place doubles in appropriate area No
verdict: rankable, but not recommended coz of issues above and visual problems.absolute duo
right now im really freaking tired so... remap?
map looks really messy tho... random jumps left and right... patterns starting and stopping... inconsistent jumps?
yep needs a remap. or... you can delete the diff. your pick man. you can end the set with insane and itll be all kay.
rip anxient
also 00:12:201 (3) - this slider end isnt snapped. :\ no wonder a remap was suggested
also 00:12:201 (3) - this slider end isnt snapped. :\ no wonder a remap was suggested
lmaoXexxar wrote:
rip anxient
also 00:12:201 (3) - this slider end isnt snapped. :\ no wonder a remap was suggested
lmao xDDDDXexxar wrote:
rip anxient
also 00:12:201 (3) - this slider end isnt snapped. :\ no wonder a remap was suggested
at least its something \;d/
wow
is this star icon the one i gave you a year ago? lmao
why am i modding this..
not modding gds btw too lazy
also this mod is bad because i'm a bad mapper
not modding gds btw too lazy
also this mod is bad because i'm a bad mapper
Easy
00:03:424 (2,3) - Weird. 2/1 repeating slider followed by a 1/2 slider. Why not 2 1/1 sliders, 1 circle, then a 1/2 slider? it sounds a lot better imo.
00:30:233 (2,3) - Very bad looking. Try https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4794777, if anything.
00:30:233 (2,3) - Very bad looking. Try https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4794777, if anything.
Normal
00:07:094 (4) - extend to white tick? you're clearly not afraid of using 1/2.
01:12:201 (2,3) - blanket please
01:12:201 (2,3) - blanket please
Light Insane
00:04:860 (3,1) - blanket please
00:09:967 (3) - personally, i'd use 2 circles instead of a slider. your choice though.
01:12:839 (1,2,3,4,5) - only jump in the map. it feels.. weird. i don't know how to describe it.
00:09:967 (3) - personally, i'd use 2 circles instead of a slider. your choice though.
01:12:839 (1,2,3,4,5) - only jump in the map. it feels.. weird. i don't know how to describe it.
Insane
Absolute Duo seems fineInconsistent kiai
00:00:233 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6) - increase the spacing a bit? it's kinda cluttered.
00:17:626 (5,1,2) - blanket with 5 and 2 could be better.
00:47:467 (1,2) - there's never enough blankets in this world.
01:22:733 (5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2) - try a triple then 1/4 slider jumps until the next 1/2 slider. seems better, imo.
00:00:233 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6) - increase the spacing a bit? it's kinda cluttered.
00:17:626 (5,1,2) - blanket with 5 and 2 could be better.
00:47:467 (1,2) - there's never enough blankets in this world.
01:22:733 (5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2) - try a triple then 1/4 slider jumps until the next 1/2 slider. seems better, imo.
i just realized, isnt the bg swapped around?
blonde chick is supposed to have big boobs and julie is supposed to be flat. wtf
blonde chick is supposed to have big boobs and julie is supposed to be flat. wtf
Never forget to say BN's are shit and Quality is just a denial to say u're not inside the BN circlejerking! 
Rank this map. Now
Pls rank this... I will rank Blade of Hope together with u
2015 January anime lets go!
2015 January anime lets go!
kill yourself owntroll
Topic Starter
Im quite sure I played it a few hundred times by now
alright here's some quick opinions for easy and normal because fuck i was bored
Easy
Honestly you're better off remapping this, and here's why:
00:05:020 (3,1) - Stuff like this is kinda FUCK for newbies because it throws em WAY off, 1/2 in an easy is generally a bad idea at this BPM anyway
The slow parts are in 2/1, which by itself is not a problem, but when you have sudden jerky transitions like 00:20:977 (3,1,2,3,1) - (1/2 AGAIN owntrolf WHAT ARE you DOING) it can be REALLY awkward and i mean REALLY awkward
01:15:871 (1) - Stuff like this is WEIRD since the slider doesn't seem to be following an obvious rhythm
01:18:424 (4,1) - All of the weird changes in slider length, such as here, may fit within the song but ONCE AGAIN confusing the heck out of a new player, might just want to stick to a 1/1 rhythm with an occasional 2/1 slider when it fits within the song
If you don't want to remap it that's k but I think you'd benefit greatly from doing so.
00:05:020 (3,1) - Stuff like this is kinda FUCK for newbies because it throws em WAY off, 1/2 in an easy is generally a bad idea at this BPM anyway
The slow parts are in 2/1, which by itself is not a problem, but when you have sudden jerky transitions like 00:20:977 (3,1,2,3,1) - (1/2 AGAIN owntrolf WHAT ARE you DOING) it can be REALLY awkward and i mean REALLY awkward
01:15:871 (1) - Stuff like this is WEIRD since the slider doesn't seem to be following an obvious rhythm
01:18:424 (4,1) - All of the weird changes in slider length, such as here, may fit within the song but ONCE AGAIN confusing the heck out of a new player, might just want to stick to a 1/1 rhythm with an occasional 2/1 slider when it fits within the song
If you don't want to remap it that's k but I think you'd benefit greatly from doing so.
Normal
IT'S JUST AN OPINION BROWhy is the SV so slow? It could easily be better at 1.1 or 1.2 rather than 0.9.
00:09:169 (4,5,6) - This is kind of a bit of a weird flow, isn't it?
Honestly if you haven't remapped it in the year this map has existed I'd do it now if you ACTUALYL want it ranked, since it'd be better purely based off of experience then what you have currently, same with Easy.
00:09:169 (4,5,6) - This is kind of a bit of a weird flow, isn't it?
Honestly if you haven't remapped it in the year this map has existed I'd do it now if you ACTUALYL want it ranked, since it'd be better purely based off of experience then what you have currently, same with Easy.
Going once, going twice...
@Owntrolf: Are you still planning to ranking this mapset?
@Owntrolf: Are you still planning to ranking this mapset?
Topic Starter
SureBeatofIke wrote:
Going once, going twice...
@Owntrolf: Are you still planning to ranking this mapset?
You know what. Fix this and I'll end this meme once and for all.
This mapset is technically an old bubble anyways.
[Absolute Duo]
This mapset is technically an old bubble anyways.
[Absolute Duo]
- 00:12:201 (3) - This slider is unsnapped. Please fix.
Topic Starter
Done, sorry for your BN points hitBeatofIke wrote:
You know what. Fix this and I'll end this meme once and for all.
This mapset is technically an old bubble anyways.
[Absolute Duo]
- 00:12:201 (3) - This slider is unsnapped. Please fix.
Good Luck~
o
Is this happening
whoa really
unrankable issue ?Kibbleru wrote:
i just realized, isnt the bg swapped around?
blonde chick is supposed to have big boobs and julie is supposed to be flat. wtf
The pressure, dude
good stuff. Good luck Owntrolf o/
KIMI -
never forget bearizm 2k16
before it gets ranked i need to fix some nc's , plz wait
never forget bearizm 2k16
before it gets ranked i need to fix some nc's , plz wait
I'm really disappointed in you BeatofIke. It feels like you only bubbled this because you felt obligated to rather than trying to improve the quality of the mapset before pushing it forward.
Whatever the case may be, I'll address some issues in the last difficulty I hope you and Owntrolf should review first before trying to move this set any further.
I'm not so concerned with the map itself, but moreso as to why BeatofIke thought it was in good reason to nominate and push this set forward when it's clearly not ready yet.
Whatever the case may be, I'll address some issues in the last difficulty I hope you and Owntrolf should review first before trying to move this set any further.
Absolute Duo
Probably the only diff that's most trigger inducing in this set.
00:01:350 (6,1,2) - The way this is structured seems a bit odd because the way it's played seems like these 3 circles would be part of the same combo but they're split on the downbeat. Especially when you show a similar relationship with 00:01:828 (3,4,5) - it makes the former combo's (6) look a bit out of place.
00:04:381 (3,4,5) - Spacing difference here might be strange. ctrl-g the (5) could improve flow but the next combo would have to be adjusted to continue it.
00:05:818 (4,5,6,7) - the entire sequence spells laziness to me especially because the last part of this combo isn't a perfect triangle like the first part. why is that?
00:09:488 (3) - I would imagine this being around 66;79 to continue this flowy movement and the slider on the right side of this combo.
00:14:115 (1,2) - Rhythm should be ctrl-g'd to hit the downbeat but you do this so frequently (albeit a weak decision) that it'd be redundant to point them all out.
00:18:105 (7) - Should be NC'd since you do it previous combos. Sure the vocal is next but it's a weak decision imo..
00:19:222 (5) - NC since you do it before.
00:20:020 (1) - Remove NC
00:20:658 (3) - NC
00:17:147 (3,5,1) - I'm not sure what it is you're making with this formation of sliders since they don't really compliment each other nor overlap pleasantly. The flow also gets altered as you hit this so it doesn't really make sense to me..
00:19:222 (5) - NC problems again, you get the idea. I won't point these out anymore.
00:23:211 (7) - ^ one last one kek
00:32:786 (3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5) - I don't understand why split the stream so intently when the only difference between the first half and second is a drum beat. What could make for a neat effect is making either accelerating streams to empower the vocals or decelerating streams to emphasize the next section of the song. Either way might work better than what you have currently.
00:35:339 (3) - According to your logic, this should be NC'd as well where 00:34:860 (1) - gets no NC. This whole section has a bit of NC problems so keep them consistent pls.
One other thing - from a structural point - of view is just look at how congested this is 00:37:892 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1) - they are all falling within the same boxed area within the editor. Nothing deviates these patterns apart which makes for a rather repetitive beatmap.
00:47:467 (1) - Why not make this slider blanket the previous slider's tail? Right now it overlaps unnecessarily so I'm just thinking about aesthetics with this.
00:49:701 (1) - You can reduce this slider by 1/2 to add a circle on the white and start an NC there with 4 beats. In that way: 00:51:296 (3) - will be NC'd on the downbeat.
00:51:775 (4) - this might look better if it was the same slider as (3) but flipped onto the other side instead.
00:59:754 (1) - remove NC and add NC 01:00:073 (3) -
01:01:190 (1,2) - NC stuff here too
01:01:350 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - this entire sequence might just be better if it was all circles and one or two consistent NCs.
01:05:179 (1) - Remove NC
01:06:296 (7,1,2,3,1) - DS varies here too much. Strong beats should have larger spacing (theoretically) than the weaker beats. Also NC problems and I think ion general the pattern could be improved so it doesn't look like, well, im not sure what design you were going with this entire thing 01:06:296 (7,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,4,5) -
01:16:669 (1,2,3) - Lots of undermapping here when the other diffs don't do it. Your previous phrase you didn't undermap it here either so why start undermapping?
01:19:860 (3) - personally I don't think these look attractive but that's debatable to whomever thinks otherwise.
01:21:296 (3) - Overlap seems a bit unnecessary here. Get partially overlapped with 01:21:775 (1) - and I think that those two sliders don't really work well, given just how much is being undermapped in the chorus. It's kiai time after all.
01:23:052 (1) - Might be better to map as circles to bring more emphasis around.
01:24:647 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - The second half is a bit off from being a perfect triangle.
01:27:201 (1,2,3) - Dunno about that overlap.
Keep in mind these are only SOME of the issues I have with THIS difficulty. I've ignored many structural flaws and lack of patterning alternatives, but that's something you can be able to create on your own given the proper circumstance. Editor space usage seems a bit tight too, so a lot of the combos and stuff are pretty congested and centralized when there's still a lot of room to use. The other difficulties definitely have some moddable things to look out for too but this diff in particular has the most issues imo from the entire set.
00:01:350 (6,1,2) - The way this is structured seems a bit odd because the way it's played seems like these 3 circles would be part of the same combo but they're split on the downbeat. Especially when you show a similar relationship with 00:01:828 (3,4,5) - it makes the former combo's (6) look a bit out of place.
00:04:381 (3,4,5) - Spacing difference here might be strange. ctrl-g the (5) could improve flow but the next combo would have to be adjusted to continue it.
00:05:818 (4,5,6,7) - the entire sequence spells laziness to me especially because the last part of this combo isn't a perfect triangle like the first part. why is that?
00:09:488 (3) - I would imagine this being around 66;79 to continue this flowy movement and the slider on the right side of this combo.
00:14:115 (1,2) - Rhythm should be ctrl-g'd to hit the downbeat but you do this so frequently (albeit a weak decision) that it'd be redundant to point them all out.
00:18:105 (7) - Should be NC'd since you do it previous combos. Sure the vocal is next but it's a weak decision imo..
00:19:222 (5) - NC since you do it before.
00:20:020 (1) - Remove NC
00:20:658 (3) - NC
00:17:147 (3,5,1) - I'm not sure what it is you're making with this formation of sliders since they don't really compliment each other nor overlap pleasantly. The flow also gets altered as you hit this so it doesn't really make sense to me..
00:19:222 (5) - NC problems again, you get the idea. I won't point these out anymore.
00:23:211 (7) - ^ one last one kek
00:32:786 (3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5) - I don't understand why split the stream so intently when the only difference between the first half and second is a drum beat. What could make for a neat effect is making either accelerating streams to empower the vocals or decelerating streams to emphasize the next section of the song. Either way might work better than what you have currently.
00:35:339 (3) - According to your logic, this should be NC'd as well where 00:34:860 (1) - gets no NC. This whole section has a bit of NC problems so keep them consistent pls.
One other thing - from a structural point - of view is just look at how congested this is 00:37:892 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1) - they are all falling within the same boxed area within the editor. Nothing deviates these patterns apart which makes for a rather repetitive beatmap.
00:47:467 (1) - Why not make this slider blanket the previous slider's tail? Right now it overlaps unnecessarily so I'm just thinking about aesthetics with this.
00:49:701 (1) - You can reduce this slider by 1/2 to add a circle on the white and start an NC there with 4 beats. In that way: 00:51:296 (3) - will be NC'd on the downbeat.
00:51:775 (4) - this might look better if it was the same slider as (3) but flipped onto the other side instead.
00:59:754 (1) - remove NC and add NC 01:00:073 (3) -
01:01:190 (1,2) - NC stuff here too
01:01:350 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - this entire sequence might just be better if it was all circles and one or two consistent NCs.
01:05:179 (1) - Remove NC
01:06:296 (7,1,2,3,1) - DS varies here too much. Strong beats should have larger spacing (theoretically) than the weaker beats. Also NC problems and I think ion general the pattern could be improved so it doesn't look like, well, im not sure what design you were going with this entire thing 01:06:296 (7,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,4,5) -
01:16:669 (1,2,3) - Lots of undermapping here when the other diffs don't do it. Your previous phrase you didn't undermap it here either so why start undermapping?
01:19:860 (3) - personally I don't think these look attractive but that's debatable to whomever thinks otherwise.
01:21:296 (3) - Overlap seems a bit unnecessary here. Get partially overlapped with 01:21:775 (1) - and I think that those two sliders don't really work well, given just how much is being undermapped in the chorus. It's kiai time after all.
01:23:052 (1) - Might be better to map as circles to bring more emphasis around.
01:24:647 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - The second half is a bit off from being a perfect triangle.
01:27:201 (1,2,3) - Dunno about that overlap.
Keep in mind these are only SOME of the issues I have with THIS difficulty. I've ignored many structural flaws and lack of patterning alternatives, but that's something you can be able to create on your own given the proper circumstance. Editor space usage seems a bit tight too, so a lot of the combos and stuff are pretty congested and centralized when there's still a lot of room to use. The other difficulties definitely have some moddable things to look out for too but this diff in particular has the most issues imo from the entire set.
I'm not so concerned with the map itself, but moreso as to why BeatofIke thought it was in good reason to nominate and push this set forward when it's clearly not ready yet.
Oh my lord...
Ohh boy...
before you go on with this, i suggest you to have a read of t/465718
it explains alot in the sense of what we call 'structure' and what your map lacks of.
Right now there are various curved sliders placed without harmony in respect to each other, sure individually they may look nice, but they lack a place as a whole in the mapset. To simply put it, they don't look great together.
As a mapper we should all strive to place our objects so that they fit and interact with each other. Every object should look as if it compliments each other, and the map as a whole. Hence, we call it structure, because it explains each object building upon each other, giving everything a place to belong. A building isn't made by randomly placing beams and material on each other, but rather planned out and placed orderly so that each beam can support each other allowing it to climb the heights.
tldr; just click the god damn link and try to learn something form it xD
it explains alot in the sense of what we call 'structure' and what your map lacks of.
Right now there are various curved sliders placed without harmony in respect to each other, sure individually they may look nice, but they lack a place as a whole in the mapset. To simply put it, they don't look great together.
As a mapper we should all strive to place our objects so that they fit and interact with each other. Every object should look as if it compliments each other, and the map as a whole. Hence, we call it structure, because it explains each object building upon each other, giving everything a place to belong. A building isn't made by randomly placing beams and material on each other, but rather planned out and placed orderly so that each beam can support each other allowing it to climb the heights.
tldr; just click the god damn link and try to learn something form it xD