Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
forum
  1. Forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked Beatmaps (Archived)

tsunamix_underground - Period. ~ Seishin no Kousoku to Jiyuu

posted
Total Posts
47
TicClick
Global Moderator
4,416 posts
Joined February 2011
Topic Starter
TicClick
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on 21 января 2015 г. at 20:39:52

Artist: tsunamix_underground
Title: Period. ~ Seishin no Kousoku to Jiyuu o Tsukamu Jouka
Source: 東方Project
Tags: Touhou Celestial C-CLAYS 天空のグリニッジ 水斎 -Prism- Greenwich In The Sky Usami Renko Maribel Hearn Han Team Shanghai Alice ZUN 大空魔術 Magical Astronomy Flower Irie Miyuki Aka
BPM: 150
Filesize: 3972kb
Play Time: 01:52
Difficulties Available:
  1. Aka's Normal (1,91 stars, 192 notes)
  2. Easy (1,58 stars, 136 notes)
  3. Flower's Hard (2,99 stars, 341 notes)
  4. Irie's Insane (3,86 stars, 436 notes)
  5. Lunatic (4,67 stars, 516 notes)
Download: tsunamix_underground - Period. ~ Seishin no Kousoku to Jiyuu o Tsukamu Jouka
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
Last edited by TicClick , edited 9 times in total.
Aleks719
osu! Alumni
2,436 posts
Joined May 2010
Aleks719
1st

продам гараж
Reiji-RJ
1,402 posts
Joined April 2010
Reiji-RJ
2nd!
Muchaszewski
26 posts
Joined July 2014
Muchaszewski
Of course everything is subjective, this is only my vision ;p
SPOILER
On hard diff
00:13:843 (3) - Move to 00:13:743
00:17:043 (3) - As above -> 00:16:943
00:20:243 (3) - etc.
00:23:443 (3) -
00:32:343 (3) - Delete
00:38:418 (3) - Move to 00:38:443
00:44:943 (6) - One repeat too long
00:48:343 (7) - To Delete
00:51:543 (7) - To Delete
01:24:343 (2,3) - Something here is wrong, delete 2 should do the trick
Repeat in every next patern copied from that one
01:42:743 (5) - To delete
01:44:343 (5) ...
01:47:543 (5)
TicClick
Global Moderator
4,416 posts
Joined February 2011
Topic Starter
TicClick
Well, I've got Flower's permission to apply changes, the "First mod post" award goes to you.

Muchaszewski wrote:

Of course everything is subjective, this is only my vision ;p
SPOILER
On hard diff
00:13:843 (3) - Move to 00:13:743 — yes, it feels more natural to me
00:17:043 (3) - As above -> 00:16:943 — ^
00:20:243 (3) - etc. — ^
00:23:443 (3) - — ^
00:32:343 (3) - Delete — no, it connect two pieces of music
00:38:418 (3) - Move to 00:38:443 — you suggest me to snap it to a wrong tick
00:44:943 (6) - One repeat too long — the sound is still going on
00:48:343 (7) - To Delete — I'll keep it for now, it's probably there to keep the movement
00:51:543 (7) - To Delete — ^
01:24:343 (2,3) - Something here is wrong, delete 2 should do the trick — everything is alright and intended
Repeat in every next patern copied from that one
01:42:743 (5) - To delete — I'll keep it for now, it's probably there to keep the movement
01:44:343 (5) ... — no! This is an appropriate beat to map
01:47:543 (5) — ^
h3k1ru
osu! Alumni
1,910 posts
Joined March 2010
h3k1ru
1st
Avena
2,158 posts
Joined December 2012
Avena
gold
SPOILER
12:46 Priti: period ;3
12:46 *Priti runs with his immature jokes
12:46 TicClick: it's finished btw
12:46 Priti: want a mad?
12:46 TicClick: yes, please
12:46 TicClick: was about to start collecting them
12:47 Priti: can we do IRC modding on your diffs?
12:48 TicClick: but what about the rest?
12:48 Priti: I can either make a post for em
12:48 Priti: or IRC mod with the mappers
12:48 Priti: I did that with Leader's octagon lol
12:48 TicClick: why not make a post for the whole set, then
12:48 Priti: ew no
12:48 Priti: If I can do IRC modding, I'd prefer that
12:48 TicClick: well, if IRC is more comfortable for you, alright, let's do this
12:48 Priti: easier to explain
12:49 Priti: LunaTic
12:49 Priti: ;3
12:49 TicClick: I decided to rename it back
12:49 Priti: yea I saw
12:49 Priti: lol
12:50 Priti: 00:06:343 (6) - I can understand the intention behind adding the clap, but I personally find it a bit unfitting, The sample you're using doesn't have much impact, it's a bit muddy and having 1/2 gap between two of them makes it sound too noisy and bad instead of actually adding to the hitsounding
12:51 Priti: Yes, that's how much I can write for "remove clap"
12:51 TicClick: I am okay with that
12:51 TicClick: will see if it needs to be removed
12:52 Priti: 00:08:543 (1,2) - Move this 4 down 4 to the right? atm it looks a bit ew due to the stack leniency
12:52 Priti: 00:09:343 (4,6) - Blanket?
12:52 TicClick: oh yeah, manual stacks
12:53 TicClick: idk if it's worth blanketing
12:53 Priti: 00:11:743 (1,2,3) - This gap is actually pretty cool, I'm personally fine with it but future modders might be pissed at it since it skips beats that are even to 1,2
12:53 Priti: manually unstacking can make this look super neat if you do em correctly
12:53 Priti: like, the whole map.
12:53 TicClick: I've had a beat there 00:12:343
12:54 Priti: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2492205 maybe like this?
12:54 Priti: 00:12:943 (5) - ctrl g if you do that
12:56 TicClick: hmmm
12:56 TicClick: will decide laterr
12:57 Priti: 00:14:043 (4) - This kinda annoys me
12:57 Priti: It both skips a kick
12:57 Priti: and it looks like there's 1/4 between it and the next note
12:57 Priti: it's hard to read as 1/2 imo
12:57 TicClick: want me to turn it into 00:17:243 (4,5) - ?
12:58 Priti: si :3
12:58 TicClick: done
12:58 Priti: 00:15:043 (2,3) - ewewew overlap
12:58 TicClick: moved
12:58 Priti: 00:19:043 (5) - even pressure between red and blue, make this a triple?
12:59 Priti: also add a hitnormal on red tick
12:59 TicClick: yes
12:59 Priti: that also solves the ugly overlap 00:19:043 (5,1,2) -
13:00 Priti: 00:21:743 (3,4) - Looks a bit like 1/4 again, i don't have an idea though.
13:00 Priti: oh ik
13:00 Priti: put it on one of the sides of 00:21:343 (1) -
13:00 Priti: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2492239
13:00 TicClick: that works
13:00 Priti: that also means you need to respace the next few notes
13:00 TicClick: yea
13:01 Priti: 00:22:943 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - SUDDEN STYLE CHANGEEE
13:01 TicClick: yeaaa
13:02 Priti: lol u
13:02 Priti: 00:24:543 (1) - There's a weak sound on either 00:24:809 - or 00:24:843
13:02 Priti: maybe make it a slider end?
13:03 TicClick: will see about it
13:03 Priti: 00:26:143 - NOW
13:03 Priti: THE BULLSHIT COMMENCES
13:03 Priti: Get ready
13:04 Priti: 00:26:143 (1) - Something in this feels wonky, I can't really explain it but I find the slider end to not actually have any impact or sound due to the cymbal before it
13:04 Priti: so it essentially feels like 3/4
13:04 Priti: also, starting the section with a 1/4 slider and then with a 1/2 gap between it and the next note feels a bit off to me
13:05 Priti: [https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2492259 perfect]
13:05 TicClick: I was planning to turn it into a double
13:05 Priti: 00:31:643 - Skipped beat
13:05 Priti: NOW
13:05 Priti: WAIT
13:05 Priti: DON'T FIX THE STREAM YET
13:05 Priti: 00:31:743 (8,1,2,3,4,1) - This
13:05 Priti: is so wrong
13:06 Priti: both NCing goes off the pattern
13:06 Priti: and this is essentially unreadable
13:06 Priti: and doesn't make much sense musically
13:06 TicClick: I'll just move it down to the slider
13:07 TicClick: as for skipped beat, I did it intentionally to have a gap between the stream and slider
13:07 Priti: okie
13:07 Priti: 00:44:943 (1) - remove new combo plox
13:08 TicClick: done
13:08 Priti: 00:49:743 (8) - make this a repeating slider, it's really tough to transition from 1/3 tapping to 1/4
13:08 Priti: 00:50:743 (7) - hitnroaml
13:08 TicClick: mhm
13:08 Priti: hitnormal*
13:09 TicClick: not really
13:09 Priti: 00:57:343 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2) - ohgod there's so much I found here
13:09 TicClick: what you hear is 00:50:843
13:09 Priti: I hear both
13:09 Priti: lol
13:09 Priti: ok
13:10 Priti: 00:57:643 (3,4,5,6,7) - Use slider -> stream tool, this looks a bit icky and not properly curved
13:10 Priti: 00:58:043 (7,1,2) - ohgod no this is just nonononono
13:10 Priti: It's so odd to jump into a stacked double
13:10 TicClick: depends on what you think the curve should be
13:10 Priti: maybe unstack the ones in the kiai?
13:10 Priti: just
13:10 Priti: an even one
13:10 Priti: yours isn't properly made
13:11 TicClick: 00:58:143 (1,2) - how about I just move it closer to the stream
13:11 Priti: yas
13:11 Priti: that too
13:12 TicClick: or do this http://puu.sh/ek3lt/acf416979b.jpg
13:12 Priti: 01:15:743 (1) - extend by 1/4 and have it blanket the triple
13:12 Priti: second one is better actually
13:12 Priti: 01:16:643 (1) - unneeded nc
13:12 Priti: 01:21:143 (3,7) - Do I need to say anything?
13:13 TicClick: moved up a bit
13:14 Priti: 01:26:143 - Maybe do smthn like this? feels better to me https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2492317
13:14 Priti: 01:28:143 (6,1) - steck iz oof
13:14 Priti: 01:28:843 (2) - ctrl + g for better flow?
13:14 Priti: 01:23:343 (1) - rnc
13:14 Priti: 01:29:743 (1) - rnc
13:15 TicClick: bottom to top: yes, yes [you're missing the point but whatever], no, it feels awful, yes, mm yes
13:16 Priti: 01:35:743 (1,2,3,4) - mappers who use stacks in streamjumps should be BERNED IN HERL
13:16 Priti: 01:35:343 (2) - Move this liek, below 1 for nicer flow
13:17 TicClick: hey, it's in between of two sliders
13:17 TicClick: nothing can go wrong there
13:17 Priti: everything can babe
13:18 Priti: 01:46:143 (1,2,3) - omg ploxno
13:18 Priti: 01:48:543 (1,2) - more spacing pls? it deserves it
13:18 Priti: 01:49:343 (1) - maybe map this to prevent really pissing off fails?
13:18 TicClick: hm? the drain isn't that high
13:19 Priti: yea but
13:19 Priti: still
13:19 Priti: kiai is hard
13:19 Priti: failing right in the end is likely
13:19 Priti: especially after the mean stream
13:19 TicClick: you can only die if you do the stream in all 100s AND miss a note or two
13:19 Priti: still
13:19 Priti: mapping it will feel nicer.
13:19 TicClick: all I can do is start the spinner right after the note
13:19 Priti: nuuu
13:19 Priti: map et
13:19 TicClick: no
13:20 Priti: btw Flower's Hard has some inconsistencies
13:20 *Priti is editing [http://osu.ppy.sh/b/527081 tsunamix_underground - Period. ~ Seishin no Kousoku to Jiyuu o Tsukamu Jouka [Easy]]
13:20 TicClick: thanks god Irie
13:20 TicClick: 's doesn't
13:20 Priti: 00:18:543 (4,1) - can u not
13:20 TicClick: I've got Flower's and Aka's permission to apply mods
13:20 Priti: make a triangle instead or smthn
13:20 Priti: oh
13:21 TicClick: uhh hold it hold it
13:21 TicClick: what difficulty did you switch to?
13:21 *Priti is editing [http://osu.ppy.sh/b/527081 tsunamix_underground - Period. ~ Seishin no Kousoku to Jiyuu o Tsukamu Jouka [Easy]]
13:21 Priti: lel
13:21 Priti: I alr np'd
13:21 TicClick: why would I make it a triplet?
13:21 TicClick: err triangle
13:21 Priti: because
13:21 Priti: looks cleaner
13:21 Priti: and atm it's a bit ew
13:21 TicClick: you mean the whole 00:18:543 (4,5,1) - ?
13:21 Priti: due to the overlap
13:21 Priti: si
13:21 TicClick: okay
13:21 Priti: and blanket 00:18:543 (4,1) -
13:22 Priti: ofc respace 00:20:943 (2) -
13:22 TicClick: done and done
13:22 Priti: 01:08:943 (2,4) - again
13:23 TicClick: fixed
13:23 Priti: 01:25:743 (4,5,1,2) - <3333333333333
13:23 Priti: perfection
13:24 Priti: 01:28:543 (3,4) - ew flow
13:24 Priti: 01:30:143 (1,2) - and no
13:24 Priti: 01:31:743 (3,4) - y
13:24 Priti: 01:33:343 (1,2,3) - triangles r the shape of the demon and you're a qat so that's close enough
13:24 TicClick: `hm?
13:24 Priti: the stacks
13:24 Priti: are just
13:24 Priti: plsno
13:24 Priti: not a good idea on an easy
13:25 TicClick: they work good inthat pattern
13:25 Priti: idk
13:25 Priti: I dislike it
13:26 *Priti is editing [http://osu.ppy.sh/b/589547 tsunamix_underground - Period. ~ Seishin no Kousoku to Jiyuu o Tsukamu Jouka [Aka's Normal]]
13:26 Priti: 00:57:343 (1) - unsnappu
13:26 TicClick: fixed
13:27 Priti: aka diff
13:27 Priti: modding
13:27 Priti: ohgod
13:28 Priti: oh
13:28 Priti: 00:57:343 (1) - why is this alone in a combo
13:28 Priti: 01:48:543 (1) - same
13:28 Priti: I CAN'T MOD AKA MAPS I'M SORRY SHE'S TOO GOOD
13:28 TicClick: added last one manually because of the fitting sound
13:29 Priti: There's something vewy vewy vewy suspicious
13:29 Priti: Normal's circles are smaller than Hard's!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111111111111111111111
13:29 Priti: not that I care
13:29 Priti: but modders are bitches about that
13:29 Priti: that and OD
13:29 TicClick: lol yeah
13:29 Priti: even though OD should be put according to the individual diff and not the spread
13:29 TicClick: haven't had a chance to tweak her settings yet
13:30 Priti: omg
13:30 Priti: Flower's diff is genius
13:30 Priti: I'm sorry I probably won't find anything but the metadata inconsistencies
13:30 Priti: 00:54:143 (1) - this is really ew
13:30 Priti: lol
13:30 Priti: just make it straight
13:31 TicClick: fixed already
13:31 Priti: 01:10:143 (4,5,6) - manually unstack? visual flow is shit, doesn't matter in gameplay but looks terribad
13:31 TicClick: made it bezier
13:31 TicClick: unstack in which way
13:31 *Priti drools 01:26:543 (5,1) -
13:32 Priti: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2492389
13:32 TicClick: cool
13:32 Priti: This set is gold
13:33 Priti: Call me next month, I might become a BAT
Secretpipe
3,316 posts
Joined December 2012
Secretpipe

Priti wrote:

13:32 Priti: This set is gold
13:33 Priti: Call me next month, I might become a BAT

I hope the map will be ranked in less than a month then <3
Foggy Mist
22 posts
Joined January 2014
Foggy Mist
Looks and sounds great, I hope it gets ranked.

IRC mod
15:54 Foggy Mist: on easy diff
15:54 Foggy Mist: everything looks good and fine
15:55 Foggy Mist: but its 1.6 star
15:55 TicClick: that's still fine
15:55 Foggy Mist: ranking criteria sets easy to be below 1.5
15:55 TicClick: it says only about the icons
15:55 Foggy Mist: and thats a rule, not a guideline
15:56 TicClick: the requirement is: the easiest diff is less than 2 stars
15:57 Foggy Mist: i thought its like: lowest diff must be below 2 stars, but if its above 1.5 then its a normal
15:57 TicClick: it is, but still it plays like Easy, not Normal
15:59 Foggy Mist: can you pass the mod to other mappers or only to Irie (and i must write forum post for thier maps)?
16:01 TicClick: I've got their permission to apply the necessary edits myself (everyone but Irie, I don't want to break something in their difficulty)
16:01 TicClick: you are free to write it right here in chat or make a forum post in the thread of my set
16:01 TicClick: both ways work
16:01 Foggy Mist: ok
16:13 Foggy Mist: on your lunatic diff
16:13 Foggy Mist: 01:04:543 (1,2) -
16:14 Foggy Mist: spacing of that two is just wierd
16:14 Foggy Mist: it suggest 1/2 time spacing more than 1/4 to me
16:14 TicClick: I may compress it a bit, but I remember I wanted to have a movement there
16:20 Foggy Mist: i just cant stand spaced streams, starting from 01:36:543
16:20 Foggy Mist: 01:36:543 (1) -
16:20 Foggy Mist: but i guess it comes to just a preference
16:21 TicClick: yeah
16:39 Foggy Mist: some of the elements arent blanket on Irie's insane
16:39 Foggy Mist: but there is already a lot of blankets so i guess some arent blanket on purpose
16:39 Foggy Mist: like 00:18:943 (6,2) -
16:39 TicClick: yeah
16:42 Foggy Mist: 01:44:743 (2,3,4,6) - another example
17:02 Foggy Mist: on Irie's insane
17:02 Foggy Mist: 00:17:343 (4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5) -
17:03 Foggy Mist: this one is really sneaky if you try to HDHR it
17:03 Foggy Mist: 00:17:343 (4,5,6) - that tripple (double + slider after it)
17:04 TicClick: umm.. yeah? These are offbeat notes
17:05 Foggy Mist: 01:11:743 (5,6,7,1) - this is also sneaky with HDHR
17:05 Foggy Mist: but much more playable to me
17:09 Foggy Mist: on flower's hard
17:10 Foggy Mist: 01:32:143 (2,3) - could be blanket
17:10 Foggy Mist: and meybe that two also 00:12:043 (2,5) -
17:11 Foggy Mist: thats all
17:11 Foggy Mist: sorry for pointing out such cosmetic detail and personal preferences, but maps are well made and polished
17:12 TicClick: thank you for taking a look
17:12 Foggy Mist: so its difficult to find any general and glaring errors
Seikatu
333 posts
Joined January 2011
Seikatu
Привет. Бесполезный мод.
А у вас уайдскрин включенный, вот.

Lunatic

  1. 00:06:143 (5,2) - может бланкет?
  2. 00:12:043 (3,4,5,1,2) - вот этих ребят можно выставить по дуге, чуть-чуть подвинув четверочку. (а можно и по другому)
  3. 00:16:343 (7) - вот это можно на 173:166 и будет треугольничек. (Правда будет оверлапаться, но это не проблема по моему)
  4. 00:16:943 (3) - этот слайдер можно отодвинуть подальше от двойки, чтобы 1.75 было.
  5. 00:23:243 (3,4,5) - сделай этот триплет более очевидным пожалуйста. :(
  6. 00:34:143 (1) - можно весь стрим застакать с 00:33:609 (5).
  7. 00:37:343 (1) - можно было сделать треугольник с 00:36:809 (7,8).
  8. 00:56:443 (6) - попробуй убрать его.
  9. 01:38:743 (6) - вот этот попробуй реверснуть.

Irie's Insane

  1. 00:18:943 (6,7) - triplet please.
  2. 00:33:743 (4,5,6) - move them up for a bit, for better blanket
  3. 00:45:343 (1) - i think you can curve it, to make blanket with 00:46:143 (3).
  4. 01:22:543 (3,4) - move them to 163:258 (for better square formation)
  5. 01:42:543 (7) - 177:144 (because 01:42:276 (6) - is overlapping sliders end)

Flower's Hard

  1. 00:14:543 - кажется что в гапы наподобие этого можно вставить нотку.
  2. 00:44:943 (6,7,8,9) - вот эта вещь внезапно раздражает, не могу обьяснить почему (но скорее всего потому что идет после 1\8 части) :(
  3. 01:05:743 (5) - если чуток отогнуть то будет бланет (но флауэр похоже не любит бланкеты)
  4. 01:26:943 (1) - этот оверлап совсем не нужен по моему. Передвинуть его как нибудь так: http://puu.sh/ekQO5/f4553c48f6.jpg

Aka's Normal

  1. 00:20:343 (2) - вот этот бы загнуть что бы с 00:20:943 (3) - смотрелось
  2. 00:30:143 (3) - а вот это стакнуть с концом 00:28:543 (5). Там потом правда спейсинг поедет.
  3. 01:03:343 (5) - вот это тоже бы загнуть к следующему слайдеру
  4. 01:09:743 (5) - и это
  5. 01:17:943 (2) - может выгнуть в другую сторону?
  6. 01:46:143 (1) - можно загнуть.

Easy

Тут я вообще ничего не понимаю.
  1. 00:02:143 (2) - не нравится. Везде спейсинг ~1, а тут 1.16.
В изи это все на что меня хватило D:
Это всё.
TicClick
Global Moderator
4,416 posts
Joined February 2011
Topic Starter
TicClick
Seikatu

Seikatu wrote:

Привет. Бесполезный мод.
А у вас уайдскрин включенный, вот. — я зачем-то его на автомате включил, но с другой стороны, если фон тоже в уайдскрине..

Lunatic

  1. 00:06:143 (5,2) - может бланкет? — незачем, он там лишний, объекты уже пропали
  2. 00:12:043 (3,4,5,1,2) - вот этих ребят можно выставить по дуге, чуть-чуть подвинув четверочку. (а можно и по другому) — не знаю про дугу, у меня вообще с этим паттерном какие-то проблемы восприятия, но я постарался подравнять их между собой (1−4)
  3. 00:16:343 (7) - вот это можно на 173:166 и будет треугольничек. (Правда будет оверлапаться, но это не проблема по моему) — и так оверлапается
  4. 00:16:943 (3) - этот слайдер можно отодвинуть подальше от двойки, чтобы 1.75 было. — подвинул, но не особо ценно
  5. 00:23:243 (3,4,5) - сделай этот триплет более очевидным пожалуйста. — как? Я могу только стакнуть его, либо поднять в нём спейсинг до где-то 0.3 или 0.2
  6. 00:34:143 (1) - можно весь стрим застакать с 00:33:609 (5). — по-моему, он там был застакан в первоначальной версии, просто я что-то сверху двигал
  7. 00:37:343 (1) - можно было сделать треугольник с 00:36:809 (7,8). — ну сделал, но это не особо серьёзно
  8. 00:56:443 (6) - попробуй убрать его. — во, вот это мне понравилось
  9. 01:38:743 (6) - вот этот попробуй реверснуть. — да, так получше

Flower's Hard

  1. 00:14:543 - кажется что в гапы наподобие этого можно вставить нотку. — можно, но мне кажется, что они там очень удачно поставлены, пока оставлю
  2. 00:44:943 (6,7,8,9) - вот эта вещь внезапно раздражает, не могу обьяснить почему (но скорее всего потому что идет после 1\3 части) — отредактировал, называется. Именно поэтому я оставил дифку Ири в покое. Исправил на повтор с промежуточной нотой
  3. 01:05:743 (5) - если чуток отогнуть то будет бланет (но флауэр похоже не любит бланкеты) — поправил, думаю, ему будет всё равно
  4. 01:26:943 (1) - этот оверлап совсем не нужен по моему. Передвинуть его как нибудь так: http://puu.sh/ekQO5/f4553c48f6.jpg — ага (зачем ты игнорируешь мои цвета?..)

Aka's Normal

  1. 00:20:343 (2) - вот этот бы загнуть что бы с 00:20:943 (3) - смотрелось — чуть выгнул, но не более, там же между ними нота
  2. 00:30:143 (3) - а вот это стакнуть с концом 00:28:543 (5). Там потом правда спейсинг поедет. — ага
  3. 01:03:343 (5) - вот это тоже бы загнуть к следующему слайдеру — вплотную? Нет
  4. 01:09:743 (5) - и это — и это нет
  5. 01:17:943 (2) - может выгнуть в другую сторону? — 01:17:943 (2,4) в дуге, но зато я её подравнял после этой фразы
  6. 01:46:143 (1) - можно загнуть. — с прошлым слайдером как раз смотрится и так

Easy

Тут я вообще ничего не понимаю. — я тоже, это из-за нот
  1. 00:02:143 (2) - не нравится. Везде спейсинг ~1, а тут 1.16. — это всё сломает, а десятую долю множителя на таком расстоянии не заметишь
Это всё. Всё равно спасибо.
ещё я всё пофиксил для Ири.
Last edited by TicClick , edited 2 times in total.
ryuu
802 posts
Joined February 2011
ryuu
что ж

easy

меняющееся св меня смущает. но, наверно, только меня.
странное, симметричное начало, которое вообще не смотрится, меня тоже немного смущает.

00:21:343 (3) - очень странно звучит, когда раньше были одни 1/4 слайдеры. если бы были кастомные нормалхиты, то предложила бы хотя бы тик захсить. но их нет. а очень хочется что-нибудь 00:21:743 - тут.
01:32:143 (4) - можно этот слайдер сделать зеркально предыдущему? чтобы выглядело аккуратно и мило.

aka's normal

00:55:743 (3) - как по мне, тукущая форма не смотрится относительно пред. слайдера. я бы загнула как-нибудь так, но если не хочешь менять сторону изгиба, то просто конец подвинул бы правее.
01:11:543 (3) - выгнуть в другую сторону? раз уж и 01:13:143 (7) - тоже выгнут, как я люблю.

flower's hard

очень. очень. очень смущают эти слайдеры с 2мя репитами в начале. лучше бы сделал бит каждый раз. и под ним 1/4 слайдер с репитом.
а ещё сложновато было читать 00:45:243 (7) - вот это. убрать бы его и продолжить пред. слайдер ещё одним репитом. ну или я просто дно и не умею играть.

irie's insane

00:14:143 - this or this to match with 00:20:543 - or 00:17:343 - rhythm?
00:45:743 (2) - something like this mb?
sweet diff

lunatic

00:10:543 (3) - а если я это предложу выгнуть в другую сторону, это будет считаться за антифлоу?
00:18:543 (3) - опусти на сколько-нибудь ниже. милее будет смотреться.
00:22:943 (1,2,3,4,5,6,8) - кастомные стаки выглядят очень странно и неожиданно. нудаладно.
01:13:843 (7) - выгнуть в другую сторону?

удачи.
TicClick
Global Moderator
4,416 posts
Joined February 2011
Topic Starter
TicClick
ryuu

ryuu wrote:

easy

меняющееся св меня смущает. но, наверно, только меня. — там нет скачков, растёт оно копейками и не рядом, так что я решил оставить, когда поленился стирать лишние полоски
странное, симметричное начало, которое вообще не смотрится, меня тоже немного смущает. — к сожалению, мне больше ничего не придумалось, я могу его сломать, раз оно никому не нравится, но над этим надо будет ещё подумать

00:21:343 (3) - очень странно звучит, когда раньше были одни 1/4 слайдеры. если бы были кастомные нормалхиты, то предложила бы хотя бы тик захсить. но их нет. а очень хочется что-нибудь 00:21:743 - тут. — порезал на слайдер и ноту
01:32:143 (4) - можно этот слайдер сделать зеркально предыдущему? чтобы выглядело аккуратно и мило. — это как? Он уже достаточно зеркальный, но я куда-то там его подвинул, окей

aka's normal

00:55:743 (3) - как по мне, тукущая форма не смотрится относительно пред. слайдера. я бы загнула как-нибудь так, но если не хочешь менять сторону изгиба, то просто конец подвинул бы правее. — я Ака и я не знаю, что мне с этим сделать. Попытался что-то изменить, но стал получаться какой-то трэшак, так что я просто оставил его в покое
01:11:543 (3) - выгнуть в другую сторону? раз уж и 01:13:143 (7) - тоже выгнут, как я люблю. — так они специально так выгнуты. смотри, какая красивая дуга 01:10:943 (1,3,5) -

flower's hard

очень. очень. очень смущают эти слайдеры с 2мя репитами в начале. лучше бы сделал бит каждый раз. и под ним 1/4 слайдер с репитом. — если ты про 00:03:743 (1) - , я ещё подумаю, на что именно их можно починить, но пока что у меня нет идей, а их постоянность на этом участке вполне устраивает
а ещё сложновато было читать 00:45:243 (7) - вот это. убрать бы его и продолжить пред. слайдер ещё одним репитом. ну или я просто дно и не умею играть. — там так и было, пока я не полез со своей правкой, которую, кстати, ты увидеть не успела. там был такой внезапно-шикарный для харда переход с 1/3 на стек из 1/4

lunaTic — так и было, но я решил не играться

00:10:543 (3) - а если я это предложу выгнуть в другую сторону, это будет считаться за антифлоу? — пожалуй, да, но мне это не нравится и без того
00:18:543 (3) - опусти на сколько-нибудь ниже. милее будет смотреться. — на сколько-то опустил
00:22:943 (1,2,3,4,5,6,8) - кастомные стаки выглядят очень странно и неожиданно. нудаладно. — поправил на обычные, надеюсь, кого-нибудь это спасёт
01:13:843 (7) - выгнуть в другую сторону? — именно так

удачи. карт на ноты побогаче
для Ири первое пофиксил, второе нет, потому что применил прошлый мод
Last edited by TicClick , edited 2 times in total.
Aka
1,777 posts
Joined January 2012
Aka
ПОЧЕМУ ВСЕ ХОТЯТ ГНУТЬ МОИ СЛАЙДЕРЫ
TicClick
Global Moderator
4,416 posts
Joined February 2011
Topic Starter
TicClick
торчат
those
3,136 posts
Joined November 2010
those
Cool

[Lunatic]
  1. 01:00:943 (6) - and the 7 other iterations in the Kiai times - Length should be the same as 00:41:743 (6) - so you don't miss the beat at 01:01:143 - . Additionally, a 1/2 gap between this slider and the next object works better overall to compliment other 1/2 spacing like 00:58:543 (3,4) -
[Normal]
  1. 00:00:543 (1,2,3) - Cute, but let's end the sliders on something in the music. Though not recommended, it wouldn't harm to start the map at 00:03:743 - if you're unable to find a suitable rhythm for the intro beats of the song.
  2. 01:48:543 (1) - New combo largely unnecessary.
  3. Overall not the biggest fan of using two different distance spacings at different rhythms. Would definitely like to know the reason behind choosing 1.00x for 1/2 and 0.75x for 1/4.
Aka
1,777 posts
Joined January 2012
Aka

those wrote:

  1. Overall not the biggest fan of using two different distance spacings at different rhythms. Would definitely like to know the reason behind choosing 1.00x for 1/2 1/1*and 0.75x for 1/4. 1/2*
but i am :roll:
0.75x looks more neat and less huge than 1.0


i believe having larger spacing between 1/2 objects is harder to control, since i tend to stop my cursor movement when slider ends while playing easier diffs. so i'd like to give a ~treatment~ etc
though i may agree to add ~0.5-~0.10 more to spacing if its really that bad
TicClick
Global Moderator
4,416 posts
Joined February 2011
Topic Starter
TicClick

those wrote:

Cool

[Lunatic]
  1. 01:00:943 (6) - and the 7 other iterations in the Kiai times - Length should be the same as 00:41:743 (6) - so you don't miss the beat at 01:01:143 - . Additionally, a 1/2 gap between this slider and the next object works better overall to compliment other 1/2 spacing like 00:58:543 (3,4) - fixed!
[Normal]
  1. 00:00:543 (1,2,3) - Cute, but let's end the sliders on something in the music. Though not recommended, it wouldn't harm to start the map at 00:03:743 - if you're unable to find a suitable rhythm for the intro beats of the song. — uhhhh fixed
  2. 01:48:543 (1) - New combo largely unnecessary. — well, fixed, since everyone is againsT it
Frostmourne
osu! Alumni
3,733 posts
Joined November 2009
Frostmourne
hey TC MAH FRIEND

General
- I'm a little concerned about soft-hitnormal due to the nature of this music that blends the hitsound together which makes it slightly inaudible (hitsound itself is fine if it is other song that doesn't sound loudly this way). I would like you to confirm with other BATs and QATs if this is fine.
- Spread is still some kind of worrying. From what I can view, it looks like this way if you get what I mean from the picture below
(E--N---------H---I-----Lunatic)
So basically Normal should be a little harder and some stream patterns in Hard should be removed (just a few!)

Easy
01:31:743 (3,4) - move down 1 grid and right 1 grid when you stack this way to compensate the stack leniency that makes them too close to previous slider in the test play mode

Aka's Normal
01:36:143 (x) - feels missing without a note here, it might be a good choice to add a note here to maintain the same rhythm you used in this diff

Flower's Hard
01:22:743 (3,4,5,6,7) - I personally feel 5 streams on Hard makes it too hard from what it should be compared with the spread of Normal and Insane
01:32:743 (4,5,6) - move this far from 01:32:343 (3) - a little right upward. Stack leniency makes it look way too close to each other in test mode which breaks consistency
01:35:543 (3,4,5,6,7) - same as mentioned

Irie's Insane
great ;)

Lunatic
nice! nothing to mention :)

Good luck!
TicClick
Global Moderator
4,416 posts
Joined February 2011
Topic Starter
TicClick

Frostmourne wrote:

hey TC MAH FRIEND

General
- I'm a little concerned about soft-hitnormal due to the nature of this music that blends the hitsound together which makes it slightly inaudible (hitsound itself is fine if it is other song that doesn't sound loudly this way). I would like you to confirm with other BATs and QATs if this is fine. — I'll see about it, but I think the feedback it gives is about the same as of default one; so far I've only got positive responses from the modders/players, which means it's audible enough.
- Spread is still some kind of worrying. From what I can view, it looks like this way if you get what I mean from the picture below
(E--N---------H---I-----Lunatic)
So basically Normal should be a little harder and some stream patterns in Hard should be removed (just a few!) — I don't know if it';s a good thing to do; Normal has got enough half beat notes and stuff and even touches 1/4 at times, meanwhile Hard has a nice SV and spacing that's low enough; I'll see if I can do anything else, though, and will try to confirm the balance with someone else. Unfortunately, 1/3 mixed with 1/4 doesn't leave a room for more offbeat notes, or Normal would be harder.


Aka's Normal
01:36:143 (x) - feels missing without a note here, it might be a good choice to add a note here to maintain the same rhythm you used in this diff — added

Flower's Hard
01:22:743 (3,4,5,6,7) - I personally feel 5 streams on Hard makes it too hard from what it should be compared with the spread of Normal and Insane — fixed
01:32:743 (4,5,6) - move this far from 01:32:343 (3) - a little right upward. Stack leniency makes it look way too close to each other in test mode which breaks consistency — I guess I moved it
01:35:543 (3,4,5,6,7) - same as mentioned — fixed

Good luck!
thank you!
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
1 / 47