Project Railgun wrote:

Hello from Railgun's Quality Appreciation Queue,

[General]

1. Add a background image. im working on it
2. Please finish your Easy! im not eaven finished normal ) i will try my best!
3. 00:35:554 - Kiai time should be here. im thinking kiai not necessary// but ok! i like how stars flash out from 00:35:554 (4)
4. Is your mp3 cut off or does the song end like that? Generally there is a long hold of the last note which is where the spinner is usually placed. http://freebirdgames.bandcamp.com/album/to-the-moon-ost here is link to official site - track 17
5. Your Easy and Normal need the custom combo colors from the Hard difficulty!

no need to remind it )

[Easy]

1. When you map the Easy, please remember to make it visually appealing. Stuff like 00:02:221 (1,2) - is not visually appealing. Give the sliders curve, try a blanket, go for flow, etc.

i just used diff for timing checking so i change this anyway

[Normal]

1. 00:02:221 (1,2,3) - Don't hide 1/1 circles behind each other in Normal. Space them out instead. okay i spread them later
   
   For reference, I used the Ctrl+H keyboard shortcut to get an exact match of the circle 1 over the Y-axis. Keyboard shortcuts are key to mapping. Do the same for 00:10:554 (1,2) -, and all the other patterns throughout the mapset. I am not trying to be mean, but this is rather difficult to play, especially when one tries to play with the hidden mod.
   i was thinking about it, and changed some to sliders, but for the rest - ok i spread them
   
   
   ~
2. 00:07:220 (1,1) - You should always avoid using a double Combo 1 pattern unless it makes COMPLETE and ABSOLUTE sense. Here it does not make sense.
3. Some parts you follow Combo number 2, others Combo number 5, etc. Please decide on 1 method and stick to it. Generally you should follow every BIG white tick as a new combo or every 2 big white ticks as the new combo. This is referred to as the downbeat.
   i dont like to spread combos to big ticks// but this time i didnt eaven tryed to think about combos - i just placed some notes to arrange them later
4. 00:22:776 - When you look here, you will see that the shadow of Circle 3 overlaps that of the next Slider 3. Do not do this in Normal. i know that ) this place is exact then i stopped to Distance Snap notes )
5. 00:28:332 (2,3) - Here, the slider track of slider 2 covers the next Circle 3. Do not do this ever. Same with 00:30:554 (2,1) -, only you used another slider here instead of a circle. Same with 00:42:498 -, etc. its not mapped yet so ..
6. 00:37:776 (1) - Sliders like this aren't very visually appealing. Please consider using a simple curve instead.

i think its left from hard diff that i used as basis for normal// i remap this anyway

summary : easy and normal - i just placed notes to arange them later - i change patterns and arange them later/
thanks for pointing for hided 1/1 circles - i will keep this in mind

[Hard]

1. The pattern of 00:02:221 (1,2,3) - is ok to use in Hard, but I would not map it. its my replacing of "1-2-3-go!"
2. 00:33:887 (1) - Never use a spinner as short as this one. You want to aim for at least a 2/1 or 4/1. but its playble.. mb not first try, but second time you will be ready ), i thinking of increasing for 1/4 as compromice
3. Many of the rules I mentioned for Normal apply here as well.

i changed 1-2 combos(exept this one 00:03:887 (1,2) ), but ctrl+h patterns// mb some of them..

Good luck.

Chaoslitz wrote:

Testplay from my queue!

Quite good:3 thanks
Here give you a little mod :3

[General]
Add a background image xox ^_^

[Hard]
00:07:082 (9) - Move this upper
sorry but i leave it like this/

00:17:221 (2,3,4) - Move a bit away i didnt understand..but perfected tringles
00:18:332 (1,2,3) - ^

Good luck ;D

Gordon123 wrote:

meow ><
[General]

• 
  де сб,я его не вижу добавь хоть модельки из игры! (тот момент когда они ехали) -может быть, когданибудь, опять нейла трясти за картинки )
  добавь звук для sliderslide,а то шумок немного есть 00:02:221 (1,2) - (easy) > http://puu.sh/sfO2q/6d4fa031b4.wav

-да ну смысла не вижу
[Easy]

• 
  00:05:554 (2,3) - загни их вот так,смотрится лучше > http://puu.sh/sfO1g/980255572b.png - ну почти так
  00:08:332 (1) - немного отогни его вот так > http://puu.sh/sfObj/764584ca65.png - да вроде и так норм
  00:17:776 (5) - немного опусти круг - так что бы он поравнялся с этим 00:17:221 (4) - хех ну ладно )
  00:23:609 (3) - слух,не в ритм же,да и стак с другим слайдером какой то левый! предлагаю его сократить и потом ещё поставить круг после него > http://puu.sh/sfOn2/ff0e757161.png
  00:48:054 (3) - так же ^ можешь не применять,но исправь стыковку! да мне в принципе нравится как я их состакал, а на счет не в ритм - там просто под мелодию
  00:53:887 (1,3) - не слишком ли близко? - отодвинь (1) от (3) немного

на полмиллиметра подвинул )
[Normal]

• 
  00:36:943 (3) - немного меньше изгиб > http://puu.sh/sfOBs/2f3460ff4e.png ок

[Hard]

• 
  00:33:887 (1) - нинзя-спины вроде как нельзя? хотя хз на счёт этого - но слишком мал,справь как-нибудь -авто 2000 набирает - всё норм
  00:38:609 (2,4) - довольно близко, отодвинь (2) от (4) немного дальше -отодвинул
  00:44:443 (4,5,6) - мб сделать так? > http://puu.sh/sfONB/08bae67826.png -я оставлю свой - да и там обычные стаки в этом месте идут
  00:52:221 (2,3) - эмм,как то по другому мб? -да норм )
  00:59:721 - ищё тише сделай на 10 или 5%

- вроде ниже 15 нельзя опускать, я уже не помню как оно - оставлю пока как есть
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Good Luck

Chalwa wrote:

Hello! Mod from my NoRules Queue

General

1. Nothing here

Easy

1. 00:02:221 (1,2) - This pattern looks a little ugly, so my suggestion is copy 00:03:332 (2) put it at 00:02:221 with rotate about 180 degrees with Ctrl + G. The best position is 142/317 its nice pattern for me )
2. 00:08:332 (1) - Here better thing is put two circles, first at start of slider and end of slider. On second circle you must put NC for consistency actualy there was 3 circles but i changed it to slider to make it easier
3. 00:10:554 (1) - Remove NC and put it at 00:11:109 (1) whats a point puting NC on every big white tick ?
4. 00:13:332 (3) - NC this and remove NC from 00:13:887 (1)
5. 00:21:665 (5,1) - Ctrl + G this two for better rhythm here and then fix DS. i like it - done
6. 00:25:554 (1,2) - Here better rhythm is two 1/1 sliders. 5 sliders in a row not good for me
7. 00:27:776 (1) - Remove NC...
8. 00:29:998 (4) - Move it to 283/86 for better blanket with 00:29:443 (3)

Normal

1. 00:11:109 (2,2) - This overlap looks bad imo. Move it a bit to down and fix DS with 00:12:776 (1) visible only in redactor
2. 00:33:332 (1) - I think this "ninja" spinner doesn't fit good in this place. I think a 2/1 slider will be much better. mb its a little short, i will think about it
3. 00:36:387 (2) - Move end of this slider at 229/185 for makes better look 00:35:832 (1,2) - made them parallel
4. 00:45:276 (4) - Put here a repeat 1/4 slider for better consistency with pattern before??sounds good
5. 00:56:665 (2,3) - My suggestion is put a 1/4 slider here, cause now it's imo too hard to read i will wait for another mods
6. 00:58:887 (3) - Remove this circle and make a spinner a 1/4 beat longer

its a strong note, better play it )
Hard

1. 00:09:721 (4,5,4,5) - I think you can put here reversed 1/4 sliders for make better rhythm at end... its better play this notes 00:09:998 (5,5) - slider ends for them not a good choice
2. 00:33:887 (1) - Make here slider pls, cause it's hard to 300s this spinner

mb its a little hard on first play, but its easy on second. it fits a song and auto can achieve 1000 on it so its not against ranking criteria



Ok, that's all. It's NM, so it's fast check. Nice song, I really like it

GOOD LUCK!

DJ Fish wrote:

Hi from my queue
This is a really nice map and I love it. It may be too good for me to mod but I'll just put some suggestions in my mod.

[Hard]
00:03:887 (1) - Move this a bit downward cause idk it just looks better for me done
00:06:665 (7) - Maybe new combo here since it is a big white tick also with the other big white ticks in the map im trying to place new combos folowing melody, why new combo shoud be on big white tick anyway )
00:26:387 (5,6) - Maybe change slider's shape then stack it or try curving it in another direction then blanket it i like this pattern
00:29:165 (5,6,7) - These shape of triplets may have been too repititive, try forming other shapes of triplets only triangles and stacks come in mind - byt i dont want use them there
00:32:498 (1) - Make this slider straight? yeah why not - remaped it a litle
00:48:332 (2,3) - Don't stack this and just overlap them partially cause it uses 1/4 distance and some people may see it as a 1/2 distance circle cause you used this kind of stack for a 1/2 distance circle earlier in the map same problem with 00:43:054 (2,3) and the other circles i didnt see issue there - any expirienced player can notice changes by looking at aproach cirles

[Normal]
00:04:443 (2) - Move this higher i liked it on hard diff, but this time no
00:11:109 (2,2) - Stack these and then move to the left i did this intentional and if it's overlap bothers you - its only visible in editor

[Easy]
00:08:332 (1,2) - Maybe blanket? to many effort in remaping just for a blanket sorry )
00:20:276 (3)- I'm not sure if it is fine to put object in 1/2 ticks in an easy difficulty so maybe delete this slider and put a circle at 00:20:554
thanks for pointing this place , but i think repeat slider fits there better - changed
00:39:998 (2,1,2) - Avoid overlaps in easy difficulties this one didnt so visible while playing
00:43:332 (1,2,3) - Avoid overlaps in easy difficuties and next two realy hard to avoid cos distance is short
00:47:776 (2,3,4) - Avoid overlaps in easy difficulties
00:55:554 (3) - Maybe make this a straight slider instead? it's part of this pattern 00:52:221 (3,3) -

Sorry if my suggestions might be useless but I wish I helped a least a little

William K wrote:

Hi~ From my queue.

[General]

1. The Background size is currently 1024 x 768, how about finding a bigger sized one? i made bg by myself - is cos game was 4:3
2. I checked the source on Steam, http://store.steampowered.com/app/206440/. Please have the "To the moon" capitalized into "To the Moon" like the one you did with the title.

ok

[Hard]

1. 00:04:443 (2,1,2,3) - The way you spaced this felt tricky, and it's Hard difficulty. Please avoid tricky patterns like this.
   00:04:998 (1,2,3) - These notes are 1/2, and 00:04:443 (2,1) - have a 1/1 gap. And they're spaced similarly. Consider making the 1/1 clearer by making 2-1 at 00:04:443 (2,1) - farer than it's now.
   stacked 00:04:443 (2,1) -
2. 00:05:832 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - Why's 00:05:832 (4) - a reversed slider but 00:06:387 (5,6,7,8,9,10) - aren't? They sounded similar imo, not higher or not lower.
   Make them all the same for consistency? idea was - make first one as slider to prepare players for triples
3. 00:03:887 (1,2) - How about swapping NCs here, since 00:04:443 (2) - is a downbeat. i didnt see connection betwen NC and up\downbeats )
4. 00:04:998 (1) - Unnecessary NC.
5. 00:33:887 (1) - The spinner ended too fast for a Hard. its hard - there shod be hard places )
6. 00:12:221 (4,5,6) - I don't recommend jumps here, because they're calm. 00:12:221 (4,5,6) - The one here are more intense than 00:12:221 (4,5,6) - .
7. 00:21:109 (1,2,3) - ^

i did it to emphasize this notes and, considering bpm, this jups not realy so intence

That's from me, I guess. I'm abit confused with the triplets concept, since the instruments are filled with triplets all the way. Good song :3 Good luck~

ReFaller wrote:

Remember you have one ranked GD, time to help this map to get it as your own ranked map.
[Easy]
Playable on every way, good job.
[Normal]
00:42:221 (3,4,5) - My idea for simplier and easier to play rhythm it points to some random objects, but i got the idea - done
00:56:804 (3) - Don't let people to rapid clicks on normal difficulty, delete this one its not the easiest diff in set - i think its fine
00:58:887 (3,1) - Consider remove spinner and replace with 3/2 slider which starts on 00:58:887 (3) i like spinner more and spinners are good for randomize scores
[Hard]
00:33:887 (1) - Too ninja spinner. Even if auto gets 1000 score, is hardly possible to get 300 on first meet. Start it on 00:33:471 (4) it fits and not against ranking criteria
00:59:026 (1) - Finish this spinner where you put green line. Maybe this one will be short, but it will ends on last note. Because it will appear just after clicking previous circle, it is enough time for react. but note stil last a few more after this green line and fades near last big white tick

Good luck.

DTM9 Nowa wrote:

Heya

[]

General

The ending sounds really rough as it stops like a small car into a concrete wall :S

its unedited file from ost


Easy

00:05:554 (3,1,2,3) - I feel like the transition here is a bit awkward. Maybe you could start the circular back and forth movement with these 00:05:554 (3,1) - by CTRL H ing 00:06:665 (1,2,3) - these and yeah
i think its a common thing that happens with blankets ) well i think its ok for now

00:13:332 (4,2,4) - 00:21:665 (2,1) - I know that the map is older and ect. but you could consider polishing the map by working on/removing this kind of overlapping for the sake of structure
they do not overlap while playing so i think changhing this just for nice look in editor pointless

00:35:554 (1,3) - These could look nicer if they were the same
how you noticed that ?) ok ok

Any reasons why 00:43:887 (1) - or the head of 00:44:443 (2) - don't have the clap addition? The sounds they are mapped on sound fairly similar to what you have represented with claps
yeah i checked this on normal too

Normal

00:05:276 (2,3) - The sounds under the tailpoints are actually stonger than the ones under the headpoints. Overall it doesn't really work as the clicking on the headpoint makes the less strong sound more significant for the person who is playing. This is atleast how I see the things. There are a lot of this kind of issues in the difficulty


00:10:554 (1,2,1,2) - 00:16:109 (3,2) - ect, Similar stuff regarding structure as i talked about in easy

00:18:887 (2,3,4) - I feel like the 4 should support the straight movement you are creating with the 3|sliderhead4 since most of your patterning has this kind of flow usage

i remaped normal using your guggestions

00:33:332 (1) - This spinner does not have enough recovery time for the newer players. Imo the best solution would be to remove the following slider and represent the strong sound on 00:35:554 - with a hitcircle as that would fix the strong sound issue I stated above while making the recovery time appropriate. The spinner's length is alright since the song is so slow (if anyone points that out, just say it's fine)

done

00:35:832 (1,2,3) - 00:37:776 (1,2,3) - Why is the rhythm so different here? Both of them are mapped to almost the same piano rhythm and there aren't really any kind of additional beats that would really alter the rhythm choice unlike for example here 00:40:832 (1,2,3,4) - where the stronger piano sounds continue over ~ 4 beats

i tried to make this part more consistent, i hope it now plays better

00:56:665 (2,3) - This is too hard for a normal difficulty. The 1/4 repeat sliders are fine as the song is so slow but this is just too much and introducing a mechanic this far into the difficulty and not even in the kiai time should tell that this isn't really a good thing to do. On top of that it has exactly similar rhythm as hard so there could be some kind of contrast between them aswell

yeah my bad - removed second circle

00:59:026 (1) - Firstly, the spinner is too short for a normal difficulty. Secondly it does not sound good to go over the song cut 00:59:964 - with the spinner as something like that is easily audible and yeah.. (the cut sounds really bad by itself so there is no need to further make the ending sound bad)

i didnt understand this part - previous spinner is shorter, but you said its ok

Hard

00:04:998 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - Again, you follow what the song has to offer so well here but you just stop doing that after a while 00:12:221 (4,5,6,1) - and then start it again for a sec 00:13:887 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4) - and end it. I could've understood if only this 00:23:332 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - kind of melody would've been mapped like that but for example here 00:09:165 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - both of the measures have roughly similar stylish sounds on pretty similar pace but they are mapped completely differently. This does not work at all. Of course you can prioritize the more noticeable sounds such as these 00:16:665 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - but ignoring everything else is not good for the map so it would be the best for the map if you were to find another way of representing the changes such as spacing if you really want to prioritize them. This is a problem that can be seen basically throughout the map

i tried to water intence parts and placed some more calm-jumping parts after them, cos i feel like making a map from only tripples is not a good idea )
anyway i added some more triples

00:11:387 (1,2,3) - Aesthetically speaking this would look much nicer if the curve of the slider would be nearly the same as what the 1|2|sliderhead3 is forming
ok

00:33:887 (1) - This is probably too short. Not score wise but rather because the newer players simply do not have enough time to react to the spinner

i feel the same, but i like how it fits the music, and its not against ranking criteria, just a little hard place on a hard diff )

00:39:165 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6) - The rhythm is questionable again but you could try aswell having bit more sliders since this is basically only circles (with that one 1/4 slider) for about 10 seconds

remaped kiai, now it shoud fit to rhythm more accurate

00:50:554 (1,2,3,4) - tbh there isn't really anything on the 4 that would need this kind of emphasis, also you haven't really explored this kind of spacing/emphasis prior in the difficulty so I don't think it fits there either

Changed

[]

Good luck~

1. What are you think about using tickrate 1 on Hard diff to keep consistency with Easy and Normal?
   okay
2. Since Normal is Normal and Hard is Hard, why Easy is called "Easy2"? I don't think so it's necessary, honestly I prefer change name of this diff to just "Easy".
   it was temporary name for testing )
3. I prefer to turn on epilepsy warning because there's storyboard on this map.
   there is no flashes or pulses thats the reason ?

1. Overall, there's a big problem with flow on this diff. Most of transitions between sliders are just uncomfortable and honestly I think it shouldn't exist on diff like easy. Here is list of all of these issues with preferable fixes:
   1. 00:02:221 (1,2) - Harsh angle. What are you think about something like this instead? It flows much better with good aesthetics.
      
      there are just 2 sliders how one stright line betwin them may be unconfortable ? i will keep my
   2. 00:05:554 (3,1) - Unexpectable transition and a bit bad aesthetics here. Don't you think 00:06:665 (1) - this slider should be 00:05:554 (3) - this with ctrl+j instead? If you do this like on image below you'll fix both of issues.
      
   3. 00:08:332 (3,4) - Similar issue to one above, but here you have one more issue, you shouldn't use 00:06:665 (1,2,3) - that sharp flow on easy diffs. Also using two different shapes here is a bit unlogical just because rythm is almost the same. To fix all of these issues I prefer to try something like this.
      
   4. 00:15:554 (3,4,5,1) - It looks like you wanted to do this symetrical, but symmetry here doesn't matter because 00:18:332 (1) - this slider looks like it's handly rotated. You should put 00:15:554 (3) - this slider with ctrl+h instead of 00:18:332 (1) - this one. Also it should be centered so I prefer just do this.
      i remaped this parts
   5. 00:22:221 (3,1,2,1,2) - Again symmetry problem, looks like you were aiming for symmetry but it isn't symmetrical. To get it you should ctrl+h 00:23:332 (1) - this circle and put it 00:25:554 - here. The same on 00:22:221 (3,2) - these sliders.
      this objects a so separated, i think there is no reason for a full symmetry
   6. 00:27:776 (1,2,3,4) - I don't get logic of this spacing? Why have you used 00:29:443 (3,4) - here lower one. It doesn't make at all on easy so I prefer to change spacing between these objects to 1x like on other parts of map. // The same 00:53:887 (1,2,3) - here.
      fixed spacing

Cerulean Veyron wrote:

via form

Dunno what's up with this sort of glitch updating a particular difficulty that deletes all notes. It's kinda buggy though. yeah it happens often this days
[- - General - -]

• - Mind if you happen to have any kind of a screenshot/website to prove your metadata? I just wanna make sure, that it all.
  song name are from Freebird official website https://freebirdgames.bandcamp.com/albu ... e-moon-ost
  and as Xgor said there p/3428205 artist is just Kan R. Gao(screenshot is lost but it was from site i mentioned before and he talks about tracks 23 and 30)
  
  - Seems alright perhaps.

[- - Easy - -]

1. 00:02:221 (1,2) - Pattern here is kinda too plain to start off the difficulty gameplay, especially when it comes to some solid linear sliders. The flux looks a bit untidy and concreted, but I already know why. You could at least try curving one of those two sliders to make a smoothr flow or something. Currently, it's way too solid for making the effort into it.
   i added some curve - hope this will work )
2. 00:22:221 (4,1,2) - 00:48:887 (2,3,4) - The structural flow over these two parts looks pretty steep and probably too sharp to turn the cursor towards it. But since the only reason why is it kept that way is because of how symmetrical it should be. Well, I do suggest mapping this one out a bit differently than the current one as it would be a little uncomfortable with such sharp flows in easier difficulties.
   remaped

[- - Normal - -]

1. 00:03:887 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,1) - Not quite a big fan of linear or square mapping executions. The whole pattern here is very heavily pattern-based and quite obnoxious when it comes to creating such structures. So on this particular solid part, nothing really that stood well together in my point of view. I prefer curving the visual flows or whatever that helps the pattern here making it smoother and for the better.
   remaped now it should have better flow
2. 00:11:665 (1,1,1) - I don't really feel that the new combos over these are technically okay to be overdone. Somehow basing off the combos by patterns doesn't really comprehend the song track much lightly, so I would suggest removing some of those and add new combos on a measure/note that has a landing instense beat, or shortly for downbeat.
   i rechecked new combos on diff
3. 00:17:221 (4) - Wouldn't actually make this slider being too curvy though, I might say you could try to make this slider flow towards the next slider which is 00:17:776 (5) - to tidy up some structures around here. Or at least rotate it if you don't mind changing the slider position and curve.
   looks like i went to whatever there ) done
4. 00:25:554 (3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2) - Nearly just like the first mod, almost everything seems to be linear sliders thrown over this whole section. It was actually used properly and rankable, but basically the aesthetic over this is absolutely solid and not the best option to represent itself appealing over the outlook of the structure. Like, I do know you were trying to befit them out for flows and so on, but it wasn't affected well. I recommend varying something here than just straight-forward patterns.
   remaped
5. 00:50:832 (2,3,4) - This one's probably more like a personal suggestion though, not a very big deal but it's worth mentioning. I would rather prefer the two notes, circle (3) and slider (4) on 00:51:109 (3,4) - , to be stacked instead and probably not circle (2) and (3). The reason why it's supposed to be stacked on the slider head is because the flow motion doesn't really show a lot of transition towards this song track's part. So maybe continuously moving until the slider would actually fit best.
   i remember what i sometimes lose combo there =) decided to unstack all

[- - Hard - -]

1. 00:12:220 (4,5,6,1) - 00:21:665 (2,3,4,1) - Well, these two parts can possibly create a little bit of confusion based on how their gap distances between circles. Especially encountering something like on 00:12:776 (5,6,1) - can be a little tricky whether it's still 1/1 or maybe a little too close. So visually, this can be really challenging for players to perceive the purpose of the circles here. You might wanna place the patterns' notes a bit differently to avoid such weird spacing throughout the difficulty.
   on my experience people who can get S on normals and started playing hards easily adopt to sudden distance increace and its low bpm, so i dont see problem there.Yes its a little tricky, but its a hardest diff in set - there must be some spikes i guess (and players can be easily clear this sections on a second try)
2. 00:15:554 (3) - 00:19:998 (3) - Well, I do guess that you might forgot the claphitsounds over these two circles? Or maybe some whistles, I don't know exactly what you've trying to make an effect to hitsounding. Because currently it just sounded a bit inconsistent with some whistle > whistle > clap, or clap > clap > whistle, or whatsoever. I just don't really get your hitsound concept though.
   nice catch - i think i lost them in one of those remaps ) added claps
   its a little wonky but concept was add claps only for piano bass notes (00:05:554 (3,7,4,8,5) - etc
3. 00:37:221 (5,6,7) - 00:48:332 (2,3,4,5,6) - I don't really think there's a landing note on 00:37:498 - which wouldn't actually have to be lifted after the 1/4 slider repeat. The rhythm composition can either be improved here as well, so you might need to mainly follow the melody just for this part. Try something like this for example, rather than a high note density stream. Although you can try another way around if you don't feel comfortable with the sample.
   well i tried a few variants and now i think slider works good (also it will lower starraiting a little)

Not what I can tell from here, but I don't really know what you're exactly doing around the editor. Either that you had a lot of experiences in mapping such mapset and not literally paying attention to placing some objects. Well, I do clearly understand it's an old mapset, but that doesn't mean you could keep this than moving it on. Generally, the mapset feels really solid, and I've seen a lot of your efforts mapping and storyboarding this. I highly appreciate that as expected. Although the mapset's difficulties have a solid structure and rhythm compositions being a little hasty, like a few executions forced out, or some distance spacing being a bit confusing, etc.. You know the thing.
Seems really ok

Nozhomi wrote:

[General :]

1. Enable Widescreen Support since you have a SB.

because the game itself 4:3, i think its better too keep it

[Easy :]

1. OD > AR is not good at all for lower diff, and overall anyway. now they both at 3
2. 00:10:554 - What's happening to your NCing from that point ? It's completely shift.
3. 00:22:221 - And here too, you have NC issues mostly here lol.

went classic way for easy NC

[Normal :]

1. HP5 is too high. HP4 is max recommanded. ok
2. Again, NC issues, do smth more consistent and more logical. i remade some NC for more consistenty
3. 00:02:221 (1,2,3) - I wonder if that's a good idea, since you use later on stacks for 1/2, it could disturb newbie since Normal is supposed to introduce stacks to player.
   even its hard for new players its in the begining - so a few restarts should teach them (= , and there are easy for new players, so i think its fine ( i like this "1,2,3 go" idea)
4. 00:31:109 (2,3,4,1) - Would do a flow more smooth and less broken like this https://puu.sh/yhHzB/b0bd23eab8.png . fixed
5. 00:43:609 (1) - I think this beat 00:43:887 - should be clickable since the piano note is the strongest one here.

yeah its a good catch, but i prefer sacrifice it for a better playability - slider is more easier to play after blue tick than circles

[Hard :]

1. NC issues once again z remaded them like for normal
2. 00:13:332 (6,1) - Spacing should be like others 1/1. i think i dont need another jump there cos it not the note i like to emphase. i dont think this one can confuse a hard players
3. 00:22:776 (4,1) - Same
   i think stack there should make it easier to understand that DS is not the same(didnt made it for first one cos they didnt feel the same for me)
4. 00:41:109 (2) - Should add NC for rhythm change.
   for me 00:40:832 (1,2,3,4,5) - one thing and NC there didnt feel right

Mukyu~