1. Aka's Normal (2,11 stars, 359 notes)
2. Collab Easy (1,76 stars, 238 notes)
3. Hard (3,58 stars, 782 notes)
4. Insane (4,62 stars, 1021 notes)

H1ko wrote:

great map! don't be lazy bro! :3

Kyubey wrote:

H1ko wrote:

great map! don't be lazy bro! :3

GD makers are lazy. >_>

Aka wrote:

Hachikobey

340 wrote:

предупреждаю, я достаточно плохой моддер /me slaps

[Nrmal]
00:37:712 - кружок сюда так и просится net, tut pusto, nyahooj
01:09:477 (1) - закончи спиннер на 01:12:271 (1/12) сильно поздно, если тут. поменяла конец, но на 1/8
04:27:124 (2,3) - я бы сделал вот так https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1738668 идея сама хороша, но тут будет страдать спейсинг u_u
+громкость

SPOILER

01:36:300 - хитсаундов здесь вообще не слышно. выкрути хотя бы на 30%✔
02:44:065 - здесь всё тоже очень тихо. до 30% громкость увеличь. 02:52:535 - 35%✔

340 wrote:

предупреждаю, я достаточно плохой моддер

[Insane]
00:16:888 (7) - меня чего-то смущает этот слайдер. ритм очень странный. предлагаю либо его сократить на один тик, либо же как здесь в диффе Slider Madness, поставить более громкий звук на softl-slidertick1 (хотя это, в какой-то степени, извращение). далее я зацикливаться на этом слайдере не буду. Они бы все были экстендед, но я решил выделять пианино, поэтому оставлю их
00:32:947 (2) - whistle нет, это фишка
00:43:359 (1) - тоже странно звучит. предлагаю переделать примерно вот так https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1738536 по-моему, с репитом тоже хорошо
00:54:653 (1) - ^ ^
01:21:300 (3,4) - замени лучше всё это на один большой слайдер, ибо это один и тот же звук хорошо
01:36:300 - хитсаундов здесь вообще не слышно. выкрути хотя бы на 30% разве? а я слышу. как по мне, такое лёгкое звучание нормал хитов хорошо подходит под трек
01:41:418 (4) - ctrl+g ага
02:11:947 (2) - ctrl+g не, фишка
02:22:359 (7) - clap софтовый зачем? D: там же и нормал хит нормально звучит
02:44:065 - здесь всё тоже очень тихо. до 30% громкость увеличь. 02:52:535 - 35% выше говорил
03:28:888 (7) - лучше замени этот кружок на двухтиковый слайдер, ибо на красном тике ещё есть звук он не настолько заметный, чтобы его хотелось выделить, да и нет мыслей, как впихнуть туда его, и вообще кружок мне больше нравится, вот
04:14:065 (1) - я обосрался. слишком внезапно. да не, у кого не просил тестплей, ни у кого проблем не было
04:17:065 (8) - удали этот кружок, ибо слишком выбивается. 04:15:477 (7,1) - вот здесь, например, никакого кружка не было. и вот здесь 04:18:300 (5,1) - . да и звучит так куда лучше, имо. я пианину выделил этими кружками
04:22:535 (7,1) - я бы на твоём месте поменял кружок и слайдер местами (на таймлайне, конечно), ибо длинный звук у нас как раз-таки на месте кружка ставить хвосты слайдеров на большие белые тики - неок
04:28:359 (8) - удали пианина же
[Hard]
00:40:888 (4) - ctrl+g не нравится
01:37:359 (4) - либо увеличь спейсинг, либо добавь круг на 01:37:182 - я думал, увеличивал спейсинг D: видимо, забыл. хорошо, увеличил
03:10:535 (4) - ctrl+g хорошо
и не забудь поменять громкость выше

SPOILER

01:36:300 - хитсаундов здесь вообще не слышно. выкрути хотя бы на 30%
02:44:065 - здесь всё тоже очень тихо. до 30% громкость увеличь. 02:52:535 - 35%

Slow-ru wrote:

My brother has converted to Islam because of this

Lapis Aoki wrote:

Islam is important though, and btw Kyubey, i'm gonna mod this map after I finish my GD list ~ x.x

Lapis Aoki wrote:

[Collab Easy]

1. 00:18:477 (3) - NC here? It sounded good here, since the music became louder lol ~ xDD (I think you didn'tunderstand) o3o i dont really think it is necessary to put it there. as i hear, this part just a continuation but not a new one which needed to be emphasized orz
2. 00:49:712 - You should add a note here because the beat starts here ~ starting from vocals there~
3. 01:49:359 (4) - Move this to x:328 y:184 so it could be perfectly stacked with 01:47:947 (2) ~ :3 this is intentional

[Aka's Normal]

1. 00:17:241 (4) - NC here, same reason as easy ~ same as easy
2. 00:22:888 (5) - ^ ^
3. 00:45:477 (3) - Move this to x:148 y:24 ? I think its better to move it though, and also, cause the beat starts here ~ interesting suggestiong but nope, i want to keep this pattern be straight
4. 01:26:065 (5) - This note is not perfectly stacked with (3)'s tail ~ :c I suggest that you move it x:87 y:120 so it'll be perfectly stacked ~ :3 ✔
5. 01:26:771 (7) - Same thing here, but you move this to x:260 y:130 intentional
6. 01:35:594 (8) - Move this to x:292 y:75, cause the place that you set sounded weird a little bit.. i dont really see anything weird with it lol sorry
7. 01:38:771 (5) - This not is not perfectly stacked with (3) I suggest that you move it to x:329 y:272 intentional as well, i dont want to stack it with (3)
8. 01:55:712 (1) - Same thing here, move it to x:269 y:318 so it will be perfectly stacked with (4) same

I hate to scare you but, there's some stack problems in this diff im afraid to say this but almost all of them are intentional like i mentioned above lol

Lapis Aoki wrote:

Hii ~ <3 From PM request ~~
[Collab Easy]

1. 00:27:124 (1,3) - Make this a little bit curve for better blanket ~ okii
2. 00:29:947 (1) - It would be nice if you copied this and pasted at 00:30:653 (2) ~ c: i like how it looks now
3. 00:32:594 (5) - I think the NC should start from here ~ sure
4. 02:01:006 (5) - Copy this at 02:00:300 (4) for better blanket ~ i don't want to make them similar

Thats it for now, its a great map though ~ <3
Good luck ~ :3

EvilElvis wrote:

[Енсейн]
Дезигн и флау :
00:21:477 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - закругли больше, а то это выглядит не очень хорошо
00:26:771 (7,1) - вот тут должен быть джамп теперь етсь
00:29:947 (1,2) - не нравится этот оверлап, совсем а мне понравилось
00:30:653 (3,4) - тут должно быть несколько другое движение, вот такое, напирмер (ну точнее, в таком духе, не прямо так делай) : изменил немного

SPOILER

00:31:712 (2,3) - заакруглить слайдер и встаавить куда-то вот так : чот как-то не то

SPOILER

00:32:771 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - абсолютно не нраавится как выглядит подумал, изменил
00:38:771 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5) - ну, наапример вот таак вот : не, не хочу менять здесь
<img alt="" src="https://i.ppy.sh/7501fd423ef5e4ded0b4020528e75ef6070307f7/68747470733a2f2f6f73752e7070792e73682f73732f31373435393032" loading="lazy"></img> потом

SPOILER

00:41:947 (5,6,7,8) - выровняй чтобы больше смотрелось с этой штукой 00:41:241 (1,2,3,4) - поправил
00:55:888 (5,6,7) - не, не то а мне нравится
03:22:535 (2,3,4) - совсем не то и это нравится
ну и короче смотри похожие моменты на инсе, все коробить не стал, как договариваались, но подобного стаффа много

Ритмикс анд хитсаундс :
00:28:888 (2) - на красном тике можно впилить то же что и тут 00:29:418 (4) - и разбавлять этим через такт я эту фигню делал специально под специальную фигню которая в музыке еле звучит
00:49:712 (1) - нормал финиш попробуй норм
01:15:829 (1) - финиш на голову да
01:17:241 (5) - софтвистл ладно
01:36:300 (1) - на последнем репите забыл нормал хит и правда
01:41:418 (4) - финиш наа голову не звучит же
01:48:124 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6) - в стримах на каждый синий тик хитнормлы нет же, их слишком много получается, и я под другой звук их ставил
01:52:359 (2,3,4,5) - тут тоже ^
02:10:182 (1) - 02:21:477 (1) - на, ознакомься, лень все это писать и здесь
http://puu.sh/9Gx2F/6411729ce6.osu
можно сделать что-то подобное

ну пускай пока все будет, просто сам прочекай из-за маленького спейсинга местаами выглядит ниочень как по мне, в спокойных местах такой спейсинг самое то

Slow-ru wrote:

Мод несёт моё мнение, не отвечаю за сохранность попок, в том числе и своей.

Зачем было делать пробел между 02:10:094 и 02:10:182 по киаю? Вроде и без него всё нормально. фонтанчик же


-

Hard:
Отделался лёгким миссом и слайдербрейком.
Или дело во мне, или я слишком давно не следил за тенденциями осу, но я бы не назвал это хардом, скорее, инсом.
Но, видимо, моё время прошло.
В целом, нормально, только первый стрим какой-то внезапный. разве? по-моему нет. ну и ладно

-

Insane:
Экстра-бум да какая экстра, лол, обычный лёгкий инс
04:35:594 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - что-то как-то небрежно раскидал. Попробуй спейсинг поровнее. он равномерно уменьшался
ХП-бар хочет меня убить ХП -1 да брось ты, нормальный дрейн

Всё.

Kyubey wrote:

да какая экстра, лол, обычный лёгкий инс
да брось ты, нормальный дрейн

Kyubey wrote:

он равномерно уменьшался

1. Nothing to say here.

1. 00:16:888 (7,1) - I'm not a fan of these patterns unless these to fit with the music since in this part of the instrumental the sounds are in 1/2, you can fix this problem by doing the same you made here 00:18:300 (7).
2. 00:19:712 (7,7,7) - ^
3. 00:18:300 (7) - I don't think it's good to ignore the strong beats in this selection cuz is a bit weird for me, in my opinion you can add one circle here 00:18:300 - and moving the slider to 00:18:477.
4. 00:21:124 (7) - ^
5. 00:23:947 (7) - ^
6. 00:35:418 (6,1) - switch NC
7. 00:43:624 - I'm sure this part of the slider doesn't follow nothing in music because you are ignoring the sound from this part 00:43:535 - , to solve this issue is recommended shortening the slider and add a note in the next place.
8. 00:54:653 (1) - ^ 02:26:418 (1) - ^
9. 00:47:594 (5) - NC. 00:48:300 (9) - NC.
10. 02:37:712 (1,2) - this kinda weird for me is better if you finish this slider 02:37:712 (1) - in the next white tick or doing something like this:
    
    Example

    
11. 03:06:653 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - the flow in this part is a bit awkward because the cursor doesn't flow properly and that's annoying.
12. 03:25:712 (3) - what do you think to do Ctrl + G on this? this improves the flow just a bit.

1. 00:20:771 (4) - same thing that I've mentioned in the previous diff.
2. 00:47:594 - NC.
3. 00:48:300 - ^

1. Pretty nice aka, good job.

1. 01:36:653 (1) - This NC is unnecesary imo.

Gero wrote:

Yo, M4M here

General

1. Nothing to say here.

Insane

1. 00:16:888 (7,1) - I'm not a fan of these patterns unless these to fit with the music since in this part of the instrumental the sounds are in 1/2, you can fix this problem by doing the same you made here 00:18:300 (7). okii, everyone talking about it, maybe it's really bad, changed
2. 00:19:712 (7,7,7) - ^ ^
3. 00:18:300 (7) - I don't think it's good to ignore the strong beats in this selection cuz is a bit weird for me, in my opinion you can add one circle here 00:18:300 - and moving the slider to 00:18:477. i'll keep it because sliders are intended to start on click in music in this part
4. 00:21:124 (7) - ^ ^
5. 00:23:947 (7) - ^ ^
6. 00:35:418 (6,1) - switch NC done
7. 00:43:624 - I'm sure this part of the slider doesn't follow nothing in music because you are ignoring the sound from this part 00:43:535 - , to solve this issue is recommended shortening the slider and add a note in the next place. i don't want to change sliders on part like this
8. 00:54:653 (1) - ^ 02:26:418 (1) - ^
9. 00:47:594 (5) - NC. 00:48:300 (9) - NC. oki
10. 02:37:712 (1,2) - this kinda weird for me is better if you finish this slider 02:37:712 (1) - in the next white tick or doing something like this: oki
    
    Example

    
11. 03:06:653 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - the flow in this part is a bit awkward because the cursor doesn't flow properly and that's annoying. for me it plays good
12. 03:25:712 (3) - what do you think to do Ctrl + G on this? this improves the flow just a bit. but it flows good for me when i'm playing D:

Hard

1. 00:20:771 (4) - same thing that I've mentioned in the previous diff. same answer too
2. 00:47:594 - NC. oki
3. 00:48:300 - ^ oki

This is all ~
GL

PeaseMaker wrote:

mod via #russian lulz XD
Insane:

SPOILER

00:37:182 - miss sound on red tick. You must mapping only on music or vocal track. there's slidertick that sounds good, and there's no "should map only vocal or only music", there's different stylesBut 00:35:594 (2,3,4,5) - this goes on music \ 00:37:359 (2) - vocal slider. It's playable but idk.
00:42:477 (8,9) - bad flow no D:
00:43:712 - miss sound. 00:43:624 - this tick haven't sound. special feature
00:47:594 (1,2) - ctrl g . I think it's look better. no, it repeats 00:46:888 (1,2) - this
01:04:712 (5,6) - bad flow. lol no like it
01:17:065 (4,5,6,7,8) - kakafonia XD think abt it nono, flows worse than my way
01:49:535 (2,3,4,5) - make stream better ok
01:57:477 (1) - move to x-336 y-260 ok
02:08:771 (1,2,3) - WOW. I like it \o/ thank you
02:21:124 (1) - Move your little don't want
02:26:241 (2) - goes a little up ok
03:06:653 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - bad flow, nope? nope
03:52:182 (2,3,4,5,6) - it's look better, but idk about it, you not using that pattern anymore and i think it's suddenly i thought about it. changed
04:06:741 (6) - unstack it no
Great job Kyu.thank you

Hard:

SPOILER

01:00:829 - add note. ( insane have this note ) thank ok to skip some not necessary notes in easier diffs
01:02:241 - ^ ^
01:23:947 (1,2,3) - i want TAP TAP on this part and is likely to get misses ( red ticks have drums sound ) for me it reads enough
01:34:888 (1,2,3,4) - its good <3 ^ no change it. Play your map moreeee MOREEE. XD lol ok
01:33:829 (2) - ctrl+g no
01:34:182 (3) - ^ like to play it no
01:34:535 (4) - ^ no
01:37:182 - add note better to skip it in such slow place
01:40:359 - ^ ^
01:41:947 - ? ^
02:19:712 (4) - it's better no
04:36:300 (5,6,7,8) - :3 changed but in another way

Sorry, i can't modding normal & easy. Because idk how to map easy diffs. Your map very good and my mod it's only my opinion.
Good luck and rank it Kyu. <3

smallboat wrote:

[Aka's Normal] (Some combo have bit long,suggest NC make easy to read.)

00:37:006 (4) - Combo have a bit long,set NC here?✔
00:49:006 (6,1,2) - Feel this play to hard in nm diff,so I suggest 00:49:535 (2) - delete note,and 00:49:182 (1) - add a reverse,try it? i tried this multiple times when the diff wasnt done but i'd like to keep the pattern which goes after it and avoid mess on the field
00:51:829 (6) - Combo have a bit long,set NC here?✔
00:56:771 (5) - ^✔
01:01:712 (4) - NC nop
01:22:888 (5) - ^✔
01:33:300 (4) - Perhaps can add a whistle in head.(Follow vocal) ,and NC.✔
01:44:771 (7) - NC✔
01:50:065 (2) - Forgot add a clap in the end?✔
02:05:771 (4) - Add a whistle follow music?✔
02:29:771 (6) - NC✔
02:35:594 (5) - ^✔
02:46:535 (5) - ^ added but on previous
02:52:535 (6) - ^^
03:08:771 (5) - ^ next
03:22:182 (4) - NC too.✔
04:34:006 (3) - ^ no need

smallboat wrote:

Hello,Kyubey,sorry late. hii

1. Red words: Should be fixed.
2. Blue words : Highly recommended suggestion.
3. Black words : In my opinion.

[General]

Fine.

[Collab Easy]

02:51:829 (4) - Feel this rhythm have a bit strange,use a 2/1 slider,try it? (Start 02:51:477 ,end 02:52:182) nop, feels fine for me
04:24:300 (4) - Forgot add a whistle here? no

[Hard]

00:38:065 (4) - Feel move to (468|96) fit the music? i like to move it down
01:39:829 (3) - Ctrl+g? want to keep it as extended version for 01:39:477 (2) -
01:53:594 (2,3) - This DS seems have bit hard to read,suggest keep consistent? nothing hard, reads well with ar8
01:58:359 (1) - Although this slider fit plus speed here,but this hard diff,I think should reduce a bit speed? (1.2 or1.3) tail is very close to head, so i don't see any problems
02:49:183 (2) - Move to (48|48),keep pattern neat ?(Suggest don"t overlap here.) i tried to make something neat, but then i droped it and changed the whole pattern
04:36:300 (5) - DS change,set a NC make read good better? changed the whole pattern too
[Insane]

00:20:418 (3,4) - Feel this jump is not necessary? (Like 00:18:653 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - no jump here. ) don't want to change it
00:37:712 (3,4,5,6) - Because iS a big jump, so (3) suggest set a NC here is good better. sure
01:17:947 (1,2,3) - Feel this can enlarge DS,sound the vocal seems can jump here. 2.0 ds is enough for me
01:22:182 (1,2,3,4) - ^ here is 2.0+ ds too
03:05:859 (3) - Try to move (184|20),and ctrl+g? (good flow which I think.) if i do it, i get bad flow with 03:06:035 (4,5) - it
03:07:182 (2) - Stack crooked off? there's no point to stack it, because 03:06:035 (4) - was long time ago
04:36:300 (5) - Same as hard diff. changed pattern too

Good luck.

1. 00:27:124 (1,2) - Улучши бланкет
2. 00:27:124 (1,2,3) - Сделай равносторонний треугольник, там чуть-чуть подвигать (3)
3. 00:28:535 (3,2) - нази оверлап
4. 00:34:182 (3,4,1) - ^
   И вообще, я бы сделала так:
   
   
5. 00:37:006 (3,4,1) - мания на равносторонние треугольники
6. 00:39:830 (2,3) - Близко как-то, опусти (3) на одну клетку хоть бы
7. 01:06:565 (1) - спиннер должен начинаться на 01:06:653 -
8. 01:37:712 (4,1) - сделай (1) и начало (4) параллельными, х:392 у:144
9. 01:43:359 (3,5) - нази оверлап
10. 02:01:006 (5) - близко к score-бару, сделай что-нибудь с этим
11. 02:18:653 (1,2,3) - выверни их всех в другую сторону?
12. 02:23:947 (5,1) - нази бланкет
13. 02:27:829 (1) - выверни в другую сторону
14. 02:55:359 (1,2) - в этих двух слайдерахволнистость как-то слабо видна. либо удали точки, либо сделай волнистость хоть чуток больше, а то ни туда, ни сюда
15. 03:03:829 (1) - выверни в другую сторону
16. 03:16:535 (5,1) - бланкет куд би бэттэр
17. 03:23:594 (5,1) - не нравится этот момент. изи все-таки, тут новичок точно ошибется и нажмет на конец слайдера. они же не различают начало и конец. придумай что-нибудь, тем более дальше брейк и половину карты не придется перестраивать

1. 00:27:124 (1) - выверни его
2. 00:28:535 (4) - ^
3. 00:32:594 (1) - ^ ._. ну не люблю я это дело
4. 00:37:006 (1,2,3) - м.. ну не то. сложно было бы понять, имо. советую анстакнуть (3) и отодвинуть куда-нить
5. 01:01:712 (4,5) - бланкет
6. 01:53:241 (1,4,5) - треугольник с:
7. 02:20:771 (4,3) - сделай получше стак
8. 02:24:653 (2,3) - бланкет
9. 02:37:006 (3,4,5) - нутыпоняла
10. 03:58:182 (3) - либо отодвинь немного влево, либо треугольник с:

1. 00:16:182 (3,4,5) - расстояние между (4) и (5) не такое, как между (3) и (4), чекни этот момент
2. 01:19:712 (2,3,4,5) - моя любоооовь к Михаилууу страсть к треугольникам

1. 02:22:535 (8,1,2) - бланкеты?

AlexaBM wrote:

привет, ребятки с: (ﾉﾟωﾟ)ﾉ

[Easy]

1. 00:27:124 (1,2) - Улучши бланкет поправил
2. 00:27:124 (1,2,3) - Сделай равносторонний треугольник, там чуть-чуть подвигать (3) это было немного сложно, но поправил
3. 00:28:535 (3,2) - нази оверлап поправил
4. 00:34:182 (3,4,1) - ^ поправил
   И вообще, я бы сделала так: как-то не хочется менять, хочется такое флоу, как там сейчас
   
   
5. 00:37:006 (3,4,1) - мания на равносторонние треугольники да ты же - я D:
6. 00:39:830 (2,3) - Близко как-то, опусти (3) на одну клетку хоть бы оке
7. 01:06:565 (1) - спиннер должен начинаться на 01:06:653 - и правда недочёт, поправил за аку
8. 01:37:712 (4,1) - сделай (1) и начало (4) параллельными, х:392 у:144 ака
9. 01:43:359 (3,5) - нази оверлап ака
10. 02:01:006 (5) - близко к score-бару, сделай что-нибудь с этим блин, ну я даже не знаю, тут надо весь паттерн перелопачивать. пока оставлю, а если бат придерётся, то поменяю
11. 02:18:653 (1,2,3) - выверни их всех в другую сторону? не, нравятся вогнутые такие
12. 02:23:947 (5,1) - нази бланкет ака
13. 02:27:829 (1) - выверни в другую сторону ака
14. 02:55:359 (1,2) - в этих двух слайдерахволнистость как-то слабо видна. либо удали точки, либо сделай волнистость хоть чуток больше, а то ни туда, ни сюда разве? о.о а по-моему нормально, мне нравится
15. 03:03:829 (1) - выверни в другую сторону уговорила D:
16. 03:16:535 (5,1) - бланкет куд би бэттэр ака
17. 03:23:594 (5,1) - не нравится этот момент. изи все-таки, тут новичок точно ошибется и нажмет на конец слайдера. они же не различают начало и конец. придумай что-нибудь, тем более дальше брейк и половину карты не придется перестраивать ака

[Hard]

1. 00:16:182 (3,4,5) - расстояние между (4) и (5) не такое, как между (3) и (4), чекни этот момент поправил
2. 01:19:712 (2,3,4,5) - моя любоооовь к Михаилууу страсть к треугольникам здесь специально задуман кривой Михаил :з

[Insane]

1. 02:22:535 (8,1,2) - бланкеты? это особый вид бланкета - недобланкет. мне нравится, не знаю почему

моддить инсы не умею, да :с да и не страшно, всё равно не хочу его менять

Удачи o/ спасибо!

Aleks719 wrote:

Генерал
Странное разрешение БГ, что-то около 16:10, а это не 4:3 и не 16:9 что-то странно, что не было нормального разрешения, я вообще со страницы художника бг брал, а оно там маленькое такое было. но сейчас поковырялся по интернету, нашёл получше разрешение. оно, конечно, просто растянуто, но при пережатии в 1366х768 выглядит лучше
Совмещать секции вот так было запрещено: сейчас разрешено

В мапе нет секций D и NC:2, а в папке саунды есть: drum-hitnormal.wav и normal-slidertick2.wav. Удали или задействуй драм используется в выборе семплсетов слева, а вот с нормалтиком что-то прогадал, не помню вообще, зачем добавлял

Инс
00:35:947 (3) - ctrl+g, сейчас как-то не очень окее
00:40:182 (2) - опять же, какой-то смазанный паттерн. может как-то так? http://puu.sh/9WfYt/c9d4496b8c.jpg хорошо
00:43:359 (1) - реверсы на этих слайдерах куда-то мимо звука, если выставить всё на 1/2, то аккуратнее звучит. постольку их много, то оставлю коммент в одном экземпляре, что часть из них звучит не очень мне они так нравятся если их менять, то много перелопачивать придётся, да и вообще нравятся они мне. пусть будут
01:02:241 (4,1,2) - ну тут очевидный затык у флоу, 4 ты зря туда завел, раскидай, получатся хорошие джампы: выглядит хорошоhttp://puu.sh/9WgfW/42ad1a595c.jpg
01:32:418 (2) - тоже затык, неудобно, лучше раскидать раскидал
01:35:241 (4) - ctrl+g хорошо
01:41:418 (4) - даааа, я конечно слышу какой-то там звук на фоллоупоинте, но он тихий, как будто его вообще нет. В этой части мапы (с 01:36:300 (1) - уже можно) хорошо было бы наставить тихих клэпов на даунбитах, у тебя они начинаются позже и громко. ну, добавил, но попозже немного
01:58:359 (1) - категорически не согласен с выбранным звуком. на слайдере/секции должен быть normal, минимум 40%. sliderbodywhistle + whistles to the reverse and to the end. Потом идут вистлы и это было бы удачным местом для их начала а ведь и правда хорошо
02:20:065 (1,1,1,1) - пошлятина а мне нравится :з
02:26:418 (1) - эта замедлялка ака злодейка здесь не в тему, правда ладно ладно
02:37:712 (1) - ^. тут вообще брейк сразу, нафиг замедлять хм, по-моему я просто забыл гринлайн убрать
02:47:947 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - поторопился я с определением пошлятины. ты бы хоть спейсинг менял на нотках, а то слишком уж накладываются окее
02:55:359 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - два комбо, два соседних паттерна, одинаковых по звучанию(!), а сложность так отличается. ябзарубил 1/4 слайдеры в ноты превратил
03:28:712 (6,7) - что-то мне в двойном этом финише корежит слух. наверное первый из них лишний окаау
03:54:653 (1,2) - таких паттернов не понимаю и никогда не понимал, про них ничего не скажу. ну тут мне нравится
Дальше идет молотильня 1/4 с рандомным спейсингом, мне там модить уже нечего. После нее идет нормальная часть, там всё ок выглядит.

Хард
00:38:065 (4) - вроде знаешь, что так не делается впринципе раздвинул их немного, но проблем с ними не вижу
01:41:418 (4) - у вас одеяло сползло поправил
01:41:947 - не надо пропускать даунбиты хааай
01:54:653 (1) - лучше убрать подальше от предыдущей ноты хорошо
01:58:359 (1) - звук аля инс да
02:07:888 (1) - лучше подальше сдвинуть, чтоб было видно большую часть слайдера хорошо
слоудауны и новая скорость слайдера для 4х подряд - как в инсе потыкал
03:15:829 (3) - при игре стека нет, но я бы все равно чуть раскидал не, оставлю, нравится как выглядит
04:13:006 (1,1,1,1) - :Y ну что не так? мне, например, нравится
04:16:535 (5) - ещё выше залезть не вышло? залез на хп дрейн и вообще некрасиво сдвинул

Изи коллаб
странные опять же статы, выровняли бы выровнял. а так вроде нормально (мне уже было лень, оттестплеил пару раз с дт, вроде все на месте)


удачи о/

Aleks719 wrote:

нормал
я бы скинул статы, а то близко к харду okei✔
много паттернов идут с красных тиков, что для нормала не очень хорошо, каждый из них не пофиксишь конечно, но было неплохо их поубирать
01:57:124 (4) - конец слайдера уж совсем кривой =w= ✔
03:26:241 (4) - лучше анстэк, такие стеки не очень хорошо читаются на нормалах ✔
03:28:535 (3) - рандомный клэп на реверсе? и да. в других диффах все кончается на реверсе, ничего дальше не идет. мб стоит убрать реверс, а туда где клэп поставить вистл? не, тут если поставить 25-50%, то слышен клеп .w.
03:50:065 (5) - с концом опять что-то не то tut vrode ok, perviy popravil uwu
03:55:359 (2,3,4) - имхо, читабельнее: http://puu.sh/9Wi98/380b4ecda7.jpg owo да вроде норм D:
03:58:182 (3,4,5) - ^ тут и далее ^
04:17:065 (3) - фоллоу поинты звучат неприятно, лучше заглушить✔
04:17:065 (3) - ^ тут и далее✔
в целом неплохо, но есть много мелких недочетов по всем фронтам: ритм(паттерны с красных),звучание(фоллоупоинты напрягли, остальное по мелочи), флоу(одеяла, формы слайдеров и расстановка).к спейсингу претензий нет. недочеты малозаметны, т.е. их можно долго фиксить, а выглядеть будет почти так же. Но всё же то, что указал, лучше пофиксить. oki uwu✔

Desperate-kun wrote:

• 
  General
  
  I'm a bit worried about the difficulty settings:

1. The jump from AR2 to AR6 seems very huge. Also, AR6 is too much for this Normal diff in my opinion. It works better with AR5.
2. It seems that you are going for an overall low HP-drain, since this is a relaxing song. You should make that consistent though. If Hard and Insane use HP6, why don't you use HP3 for the Normal and HP1 for the Easy? Need to talk with Aka about it
3. Minor, but it seems strange that Hard and Insane share the setting for HP-drain. It might be better if you use HP6,5 for the Insane, just to create a somewhat better spread.Oooh, that's my bad, Insane was HP7 before, and when i changed it to 6, i forgot to change Hard too. Don't want to change Insane, but changed drain in Hard to 5

• 
  Collab Easy

1. 00:18:477 (3) - Add a NC here, to increase readability. It's hard to read at the moment for the newbies because the slider starts on a red tick :3 Aka
2. 00:24:124 (3) - Same. Aka
3. 00:26:771 (5,1,2,3,4,1) - The spacing seems to be a little bit messed up here. Try to fix it changed pattern
4. 02:25:712 (2,3) - I highly recommend you to change this rhythm. The 3/2-gap is a polarity issue that's pretty hard to read for newbies, and it can be easily avoided by using this rhythm instead: Aka
   
   Rhythm

   
5. 02:49:359 (1) - Move this circle more downwards, so that the transition to the following object is better: okii
   
   Picture

   
6. 03:06:300 (5,1) - Any reason for lower spacing here? o: just a mistake, fixed
7. 03:25:712 (3) - This rhythm doesn't really fit here. If you are following the vocals here, it would be better to start the slider at 03:26:418, since the vocal starts there as well. I'd recommend you this rhythm: Aka
   
   Rhythm

   
8. 03:28:888 - Consider adding a circle here, for consistency with Hard and Insane diff. Aka
9. 03:47:594 - Why didn't you start mapping here, as in the other diffs? Hmm, need to talk with Aka about it
10. 04:14:418 - In this section, you've been trying to keep the spacing. But since your spacing is pretty high and the gaps are huge here, many objects are cramped into the edge of the screen, which doesn't look so nice. Move objects like 04:15:829 (2) + 04:27:124 (2) more into the middle of the playfield :3 okii
11. 04:32:771 (2,3) - These two objects could be placed more at the left side of the playfield, to increase the spacing to 04:30:653 (1) a bit. I like it
    
    Example

    
12. 04:34:006 (3) - This could use a NC to make it more obvious that it is placed on a red tick. done
13. Overall, decent Easy! I like it It's a bit worrysome that you used 1,4x spacing - Considering that the newbies have to speed up after every slider. 1,2x spacing would have been enough here, since the circles wouldn't overlap and it would still look good Maybe you should consider that next time when making an Easy, to make it better playable for the newbies! Aka started to use it /me hides

• 
  Hard

1. 00:19:359 (5) - Come on, ctrl+g this. You've been using this pattern 3 times in a row, so it would be cool to have a little variation here. okii
2. 00:37:712 (3,4) - Moving them a little bit more together would play better and the overlap would also look better in my opinion. Something like this: moved
   
   Example

   
3. 00:43:359 (3,4) - It's inconsistent that you didn't use your obligatory 3/4 repeat slider here indeed
4. 02:10:182 (1,2) - Same as 00:37:712. Something like this: okii, moved
   
   Example

   
5. 02:38:241 (1) - You may remove this NC, for consistency with the other diffs. removed
6. 02:49:712 (2,3) - You didn't use anti-jumps like this before, so it plays pretty unexpected and not really intuitive. Try another placement, for example: used another rhythm, added one note
   
   Example

   
7. 04:13:359 (1,1) - Unnecessary NC spam in my opinion. The sliders are far enough away from each other to be perfectly readable without NCs, and it also looks better :3 sorry, i like how they looks with NC spam, don't want to change it
8. 04:35:594 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - You might add some simple jumps here to make it more interesting, since you did that with other circle patterns too in your Hard diff don't want to change spacing in this part, for me better to keep it same
9. Nice! ^-^ thank you!

• 
  Insane

1. 00:30:300 (2,3,4,5,1,2) - This is all pretty close together and feels a bit cramped ingame. I'd move 00:31:712 (2) somewhere else, since it overlaps with 00:30:653 (3) and 00:31:006 (5), so this is the object that makes this pattern feel cramped. A placement like this would have a good flow and look nice (for example): sorry, i like this overlap pattern, i think i will keep it
   
   Example

   
2. 00:46:888 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Just sort of a comment, but I don't really like this, as it looks pretty blocky. It would be more interesting if you used a bit of rotate here or something. yeah, i thought about it, and changed now
3. 00:56:771 (1,2,3,4) - If you use ctrl+g on (2) as well as on (4), it will make the flow a bit more interesting in my opinion and it would also create a small jump between these 00:57:829 (4,1) which will emphasize (1) a bit more. Your version works too though. want to keep my version, just how it looks, this smaller and smaller spacing
4. 02:50:771 (5) - You could move this a bit, so that it doesn't touch the previous object slightly. moved
5. 02:52:182 (4) - Ctrl+g would play better, same reason as 00:56:771 sorry, don't want to change it too, because it will make a jump that doesn't fit this calm part imo
6. 02:56:594 (8,1) - The movement is getting really dynamic in this section, which is great, but this low distance breaks it a little bit. For example, if you would change 02:56:771 (1) into a blanket around 02:57:653 (6), it would play much better! Try it out: changed in another way
   
   Picture

   
7. 03:54:653 (1,2,3) - This rhythm sounds wrong to me. You silenced these slidertails, but there's still no real reason that they exist. I'd recommend you not to map on these silenced blue ticks. hmm, they're following some elements in music, you can hear them, so thats why i made 1/4 sliders like this
   
   Example Rhythm & Placement

   
8. 04:01:712 (1,2,1) - Same. same
9. 04:05:947 (1,2,3) - Same. same
10. 04:11:594 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - For this pattern, NCs on every second circle would help reading, in my opinion. It's not definitely needed, but you also did that for other circle patterns sorry, if i'll make them NCed, here'll be too hard NC spam, because i don't want to delete NCs on following sliders
11. 04:13:359 (1,1) - I'd remove those two NCs though. The NC spam is not needed for reading here, the sliders are far enough away from each other. same reason as at hard
12. 04:14:418 - In this section, the spacing is pretty low and you used many stacks, so many objects are touching each other. It would look and read better if you moved everything a bit more away from each other. Even in the Hard diff, the objects are better spaced. It might be only personal opinion though. okii, moved everything
13. Awesome Insane diff! Well done thank you!

Beautiful Mapset! oh stop it you One of the best ones I've modded. I think you can call a BAT soon, when the Normal diff achieved a few more mods. Good luck :3

Umi wrote:

hi there m4m :3/ hihi :3

Collab easy

1. 00:29:594 (4) - moved this note to x:500,y:200 for a better flow
2. 00:32:065 - it's strange that u decided to ignore this strong piano sound, i would u this rythm if i was u sorry, but i wanted to keep it on vocals, for me it sounds better
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:35:418 - same here okii, thats sounds better
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:46:182 (3) - it really need something, it's a strong beat though, i almost clicked here during the testplay sorry i don't understand ;w;
5. 00:57:477 (4) - curved this slider in the other way, flow actually better
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 01:06:653 (1) - is the end at 01:12:256 - intentionnal ? because for me it end at 01:12:300 - listen carefully, if you agree change on each diff.
7. 01:37:712 (4) - i would curve more this slider to notice better the blanket with 01:40:182 (2) -
8. 01:47:947 (2,4) - what about stack them ? look neater
9. 01:53:947 (2,1) - same as above stack with the end of slider
10. 02:08:771 (2) - ctlr+G current flow is kinda meh D: okii
11. 02:47:594 (3) - add reverse on this slider, so you don't miss theheavy beat at 02:48:300 - then just readjust the DS done
12. 02:53:947 (3) - same as ealier curve it in the other way to increase the flow sorry, i want to keep waving flow here ;w;
    
    SPOILER

    
13. 03:25:712 (3) - this long slider doesn't fit imo try this rythm instead
    
    SPOILER

    

Hard

1. 00:20:771 (4) - i really don't understand why u used blue tick, it doesn't at all imo i like how it sounds
2. 00:23:241 (3) - whistle shouldn't be on start instead of end ? ;w; i like how it sounds on the end
3. 00:28:182 (5) - add a clap done
4. 00:32:065 (3) - same as 00:20:771 (4) - same too :3
5. 00:43:359 (3) - and again this strange rythm (if you agree with this, change also the others) ;w; i r-really like how it sounds
6. 01:07:712 (5) - delete finish on end finishes on this part are following piano, sorry
7. 01:08:065 (1) - finish on head ? ^ and thats why i don't add finishes on places like this
8. 01:18:653 (3,4) - hum i didn't expect to see this on hard diff, if it was 1/1 like here 01:23:947 (1,2,3) - i woudln't say, but for 1/2 it just play bad, stack them. okii
9. 01:38:418 (3,4,5,6) - same as above plz avoid this kind of anti-jump for 1/2 rythm sorry, i don't like how it looks stacked, i think people can see it's 1/2 because lot of approaches
10. 01:59:418 (2,3,4,5,6) - this is way too "hard" for an hard diff. Use a 1/4 slider as u did after 02:00:829 (3) - i've seen hards with harder patterns, i don't think this can be really hard for hard players. even when i played hards, i was able to clear patterns like this
11. 02:32:418 (4) - ctrl +G okii
12. 02:48:653 (1,1,1) - any reason for all these random NC ? delete them deleted
13. 02:49:712 (2) - NC here okii
14. 02:53:241 (1,1) - delete NC but why? D: they fits the patterns in this part
15. 03:17:418 (3,4,5) - once again just no ;w; it have almost the same as your triplet here 03:21:300 (3,4,5) - so confused but really it can be detected by number of approaches ;w;
16. well hard is not bad, but i would call this a light insane especially during kiai time you're using too much jumps imo, also try to polish your blankets, most of them can be improve though. there's lot of custom blankets /me hides ;w; btw, yeah, it's a little hard, but people howadays can play really much better, so i think it follows the flow of players

Insane

1. 00:23:241 (3) - whistle same as in hard
2. 00:28:182 (6) - missed a clap yeah really ><
3. 00:43:359 (1) - same as hard diff why this blue tick again ? i just like how it sounds.. ;w;
4. 00:54:653 (1) - cf 00:43:359 (1) - ^
5. 01:02:771 (2) - clap on head done~
6. 01:11:947 (8) - extend this to 01:12:300 - i'm not sure, for me it really sounds on this yellow tick ;w; sounds really like big white tick was skipped
7. 01:15:829 (1) - delete finish it doesn't fit okii
8. 01:16:535 (3) - add whitsle on tail and whistle on 01:17:594 (7) - on (3) yes, but on (7) for me doesn't fit vocals ><
9. 02:10:094 - add a note there but there's no sounds D:
10. 02:26:418 (1) - clap on end done~
11. 03:21:829 (7) - ^ on start done~
12. Not much to say here cool diff, but check carefully your HS there is some inconsistent >< (like clap+whi but after only clap and then once again clap+whi) that is intentional ><

And that's all, awesome song and pretty nice set, just need some improvements before moving forward

Irreversible wrote:

Hi Kyubey <3 Hi cutie :3

[General]

I feel like this BG doesn't fit the song at all, probably because I've seen that kind of BG on Krewella maps, and .. the genre is quite different. I'd go for something like night, with some stars in the background to fit the mood better? We can discuss it ingame. to be honest, that kind of BG does not fit the Krewella songs, really. this BG is really calmly, and since it songs about summer, summer happiness on the BG looks really good imo. i love this BG

[Easy]

00:31:359 (3,4,1) - The tight angle of that one isn't really good in my eyes - You got from 4 to the slider, then to the right again, which seems unconfortable to me. I'd prefer something like that: http://puu.sh/aUNce.png circles are big, in game that will be played without such broken flow. but if i'll start to change it, i will need to change everything, and it will look like... ew. and flow will be bad too
00:39:830 (2,3) - Those are so close together.. Can you space them a bit? It looks better, even if DS is slightly ignored. okii, DS became ~1.46 instead of 1.40, i moved the big slider too for keeping perfect triangle
02:59:594 (3,4,5,1,2) - This really looks clustered, and after all it's pretty hidden too. I can come up with suggestions, but since it's quite many objects, please try rearranging them a bit yourself. i tried to tearrange, looks better i guess

Well designed Easy! thanks to Aka =w=

[Andreeva's Hard]

00:20:771 (4) - The repeater lands on nothing, just go for a normal repeater, or no repeater at all. eeeeh, why can't i use them there's so many maps with overmap... ehh, okay, i'll fix them
00:32:065 (3) - same okii
00:37:712 (3,4) - Quite a big jump, try to change it with 4? The jump is less then, but effect the same. http://puu.sh/aUNIx.png okii
00:43:359 (3) - yeah
00:54:653 (1) - .
01:13:712 (1) - I think a lower SV would have really fit. But it's your decision! And maybe try to clean up some patterns from here to 01:36:300 - , because it sometimes look a bit untidy (overlap, blanket, etc) okii, changed something, but didn't change SV
01:39:829 (3) - move a grid to the right done
01:41:241 (3,4,1,2) - Here again, the spacings look really messed up. Let me try to explain you: http://puu.sh/aUNPO.png The red marked spots, imo the distance should be the same because it looks way neater made. fixed
02:05:065 (4) - move to 324 368 okii
02:20:065 (1,1,1,1) - cool thank you =w=
03:00:829 (6,1,2) - Spacing should be equal please fixed!

Would be appreciated if you could go over this map again, and fix some untidy places yourself >< checked overall, fixed something ugly, i hope other parts are good
Ah and btw these blue tick sliders should be fixed because they follow nooothingg

[Katya is Insane]

00:35:241 (5,1,2) - Try to get a complete curve here, dunno aesthetics and such lol >< i tried
00:43:359 (1) - Same as in hard
02:07:359 (1,2) - Use the same shape here to improve the flow a bit?(the curve) yeah
02:22:006 (3,4,5,6,7) - I'm sure you can make a better curve .. or maybe it is a good curve but looks weird because of the blanket dunno lol, but tried to move 2 circles
03:07:182 (2,3,4,5,6) - I can't really imagine that this plays well in the pretty flawless flow so far? xD Maybe just go for another curve stream, or to get some variation, a straight stream? i played this map really lot of times, and lot of times asked other players to play, noone have problems with this flow, plays pretty well for me

That's all! The Insane plays incredibly well, even though it might not be the cleanest one. :3

call me