1. Futsuu (1.93 stars, 132 notes)
2. Kantan (1.65 stars, 81 notes)
3. Muzukashii (2.28 stars, 184 notes)
4. Oni (3.11 stars, 240 notes)

1. Not sure that (TV Size) is allowed nowadays or not, perhaps you'll need to ask someone for this

1. 00:15:342 (56) - k

Maybe this will be a surprise for you

1. 00:09:866 (18,19,20,21) - I think this pattern could be a little easier listening to the song. I'd delete (18), and I'd use a k k k in the following notes to follow the new instrument that appear in the song. I think this new thing that appear in there sounds more like kats.
2. 00:13:675 (24) - There is not an intense sound in this beat, so I don't find this object really necessary at least in this difficulty. I recommend you to remove this note.
3. 00:15:580 (28) - As I mentioned before, is better to delete this note, still if you want to keep a 2-plet here, I suggest you to move this note 1/2 back. Definetly the sound that appear in 00:15:342 - is higher than the one in 00:15:580 -
4. 00:21:294 (40,41) - Hmm.. This is not following really well the music. Would be better if you move (40) 1/2 forward and then delete (41) to give new players a little rest time.
5. 00:33:675 (65) - I don't feel this beat that intense to have a note in this difficulty. Try removing this note, in addition the transition is better (in my opinion ofc )
6. 00:42:723 (81,82,83,84,85) - I didn't like this ''off-beat'' pattern, it can be a bit difficult for new players in some aspect. You can maybe move (81) 1/2 forward, this pattern will be more consistent with others in your map, and I think it'll be easier to read to new players.
7. 00:51:532 (101) - Make this a don (? 1/2 3-plet is usually hard in Kantan (even if the BPM is low, as I said at the beginning of the mod), transforming this pattern a d d d, will make it easier.
8. 00:53:675 (105,106,107) - Move (105) 1/2 forward to cover better the instrumental, then use d d d in this pattern.

1. 00:42:009 (x) - Meh.. I need a note here, without it the rhythm sounds weird when you play the map. Consider it, pls.
2. 00:53:199 (133,134,135,136) - Would make the end of the map more ''emotional'' if you follow drums instead of vocals here because drums sound pretty constant in this point. My suggestion is something like this

1. 00:04:747 (13,14) - This 2-plets look so alone in this map, because is the only one you've used. I suggest you to add more of this in the whole of the map to make it more consistent or just remove (13) from there (or maybe add a don in 00:04:628 - and make a ddd pattern, you have a lot of varieties xD)
2. 00:21:294 (x) - Add a note for a better flow (?
3. 00:32:366 (108) - .. This plays so weird for me, I don't know if it was intentional or just a mistake. But please, try to move this 1/4 back (the best option imo) or 1/4 forward, and I think would be better if you make this a don.
4. 00:43:199 (147) - Finisher to emphisize the cymbals in the BGM (?
5. 00:45:818 (156,157,158) - I've to say the transition between the patterns is weird here. Try this instead pls
6. 00:48:437 (x) - Hmm.. Maybe a don for a better flow (? I find the flow in this pattern weird.
7. 00:53:675 (181) - Move this 1/2 forward.. Follow better the highest part in the drums.

1. 00:28:675 (110,111,112) - kdd will be more consistent because (111) have the same sound in the music as the note (103) and this note is a don, so I think this one should be a don as well
2. 00:42:485 (180,181,182,183) - I'd go with k d k D here, but this is really optional (I wanted to be consistent with Muzu and Futsuu)
3. 00:45:818 (195,196,197,198) - I don't like how this sound, I'd go with something like k kkd here, anyway if you want to keep the 2-plet pattern, I'd use kk dk here..
4. 00:53:913 (137) - Hmm.. Finisher (?

- Not much more things to say, just some 2-plets didn't convince me a lot, but still, they played well during the gameplay, that's why I didn't complain

Jerry wrote:

HAHAHAHAH 5 MONTHS AGO LOLOLOL /me slapped
I cri'd

• [Muzukashii]

1. 00:32:366 (108) - this note sounds like it's in the wrong position .w. Move to 00:32:247 - ?

This one is based on the piano! wanted to make the pattern different in muzu. :3

• [Oni]

1. 00:28:794 (111) - kdd sounds abit weird for this part imo, delete this note?

I change to kkd, sounds good to me. well my ears at least lol

Gabe wrote:

It's been two months since this has been bubbled. Someone do something please.

1. 00:04:866 (9) - try to remove this note to make this kantan easier
2. 00:06:770 (12) - ^
3. 00:12:485 (20) - ^
4. 00:09:151 (15) - remove and move 00:10:580 (17) - to 00:11:532 - to make 4/1 would be nice for new player
5. 00:15:104 (24) - move to 00:15:342 - the vocal is a bit different with former part
6. 00:16:294 (26) - remove and move 00:17:009 (27) - to 00:16:770 - to make the pattern more easier
7. i prefer move 00:18:199 (29) - to 00:18:675 - by following the vocal and drum
8. 00:24:866 (39) - remove, i think 1/2 is not really need
9. 00:26:770 (41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48) - this kind of pattern is a bit hard on kantan, try this would be better
10. 00:31:294 (50) - same as 00:24:866 (39) -
11. 00:33:437 (54) - remove and move 00:34:151 (55) - to 00:33:913 - can make the rhythm more clear
12. 00:36:056 (59) - remove and change 00:36:294 (60) - to k , i think it can follow the drum and vocal by easier pattern
13. 00:37:961 (63) - move to 00:39:628 - and move 00:37:247 (62) - to 00:37:485 - , to make consistency with former pattern
14. 00:42:961 (69,70) - remove, same as 00:24:866 (39) -
15. 00:45:580 (74) - remove, same as above
16. 00:49:628 (82) - ^
17. 00:54:151 (91,92) - ^

1. 00:11:294 (26) - remove and change 00:11:532 (27) - to k, although 1/2 pattern is allowed on futsuu, but i think 1/2 triple is still hard on futsuu
2. 00:18:199 (44,45) - remove, this part is a bit dense
3. 00:23:675 (59) - this note could be removed, there is no drum sound
4. 00:27:485 (67) - although there is a drum sound, but i think remove this note can make the futsuu not too dense,also 00:27:247 (66) - this big don is strong enough to emphasis this paragraph
5. 00:33:913 (82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90) - i think this part could make some break, like this
6. 00:38:437 (94) - remove, i think dk is enough
7. 00:41:056 (100,101) - also need to remove to make a break
8. 00:45:104 (112) - and 00:47:247 (118) - ^
9. 00:48:437 (121) - ^
10. 00:51:294 (129,131) - ^

1. 00:04:747 (13) - remove? this pattern is a bit close to oni
2. 00:06:532 (20) - move to 00:07:961 - would be better to follow vocal and drum
3. 00:13:437 (42) - move to 00:13:675 - to follow the vocal as 00:05:818 -
4. 00:17:961 (57,58) - remove to make a break would be better, also can emphasis the vocal more clear
5. 00:20:461 (65) - this pattern is a bit close to oni , try to move this note to 00:21:413 - and remove 00:20:342 (64) -
6. 00:24:270 (81) - same as 00:20:461 (65) - try to remove this note and change 00:24:151 (80) - to k
7. 00:31:770 (105,106,107,108,109,110) - this pattern's rhythm is a bit hard to catch, try this
8. 00:33:675 (112,113) - this triple is not really necessary , try to remove this note
9. 00:37:723 (127) - i think remove this note can emphasis the vocal more clear
10. 00:41:532 (140) - ^
11. 00:50:818 (174) - ^
12. 00:47:009 (160,161) - move these two notes to 00:47:604 - would make the rhythm more clear

1. 00:05:818 (18) - remove it ?, just a suggestion but i think this break would be a nice choice
2. 00:13:437 (48) - ^
3. 00:09:151 (30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42) - this 1/2 pattern is too long , try to remove 00:09:628 (32,39) -
4. 00:23:794 (93) - change to k and move it to 00:23:675 - would be better to follow the vocal
5. 00:31:056 (121) - move to 00:31:294 - and remove 00:31:413 (122) - ,i think make a break on 00:31:056 - would be better for me
6. 00:41:294 (172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181) - also need some break, try this i think this kind of pattern can decorate 00:40:580 (168,169,170) - this triple

Dainesl wrote:

well damn that would be my fault if that's the case sorry ;w;

mingmichael wrote:

i think the current title is alright. i have searched 2 sources for it
this and this

NewRulerNA wrote:

the title (君に届け (TV ver.)) is incorrect because original title does not use kanji. written by only hiragana.

.osu wrote:

[Metadata]
Title:Kimi ni Todoke (TV ver.)
TitleUnicode:君に届け (TV ver.)

Dainesl wrote:

and nobody noticed this error until after qualification...egh