~Shulin's Sane~
00:08:085 (2,3,4,5,6) - move by put 4 on the center This would mess up the pattern so I don't see any need to put in the center.
00:34:070 (1,2,3) - spacings The mild jump is intentional
01:07:047 (4) - start on blue tick Imo this sounds worse.

DJPop wrote:

~Shulin's Sane~
00:08:085 (2,3,4,5,6) - move by put 4 on the center done
00:34:070 (1,2,3) - spacings nah
01:07:047 (4) - start on blue tick nah

Mystearica wrote:

Terrible, terrible damage.

Alace wrote:

YERRA cry
and i cry
so i make a diff for fun

Mystearica wrote:

Terrible, terrible damage.

Alace wrote:

YERRA cry
and i cry
so i make a diff for fun

ignorethis wrote:

kk I think it's pointless to give a map that many 1s, however bad the map may seem like.

You'd better learn to think of problems in others' situations.

Shulin wrote:

I actually interpreted your statement to mean beatmap quality in general, to which my response would be try to mod more.

If you comment was directed against the beatmap itself I have no problem with that, but it would be more constructive if you explained your statement. That way quality can improve and future “damage” can be avoided.

ouranhshc wrote:

ignorethis wrote:

kk I think it's pointless to give a map that many 1s, however bad the map may seem like.

You'd better learn to think of problems in others' situations.

IMO opinion, all because this map actually makes you move the mouse doesn't necessarily make it a bad map. I mean its ok to put crazy streams, for example, Kanbu, Marisa Kanbu, and that hatsune miku map.

So is it a bad thing to be original?

Shulin wrote:

I actually interpreted your statement to mean beatmap quality in general, to which my response would be try to mod more.

If you comment was directed against the beatmap itself I have no problem with that, but it would be more constructive if you explained your statement. That way quality can improve and future “damage” can be avoided.

I agree with Shulin's statement. I mean 5 BATs said it was fine, and other people had plenty of time to look at it so i do not feel any sympathy for them. Plus how does it help me in the future if you don't say whats wrong. If you say "terrible, terrible damage" well what the hell does that mean, because apparrently its ok to have deathstream's "galore"

ouranhshc wrote:

Sometimes i think what would happen if some "popular" mapper mapped this song.

MegaManEXE wrote:

And not one modder said anything about the pointlessly large spacing and unnecessary streams?

Nharox wrote:

Yea, this is really insane. To be honest, I don't like it. The streams are mindfuck (00:22:077 for example), the overall difficulty is too high and the spacing is really jumpy. But it's alright I guess.

ouranhshc wrote:

Thats why i ask a variety of people for their opinion, i asked BATs for their opinion on that difficulty

MegaManEXE wrote:

30 SP or so invested into this map? And not one modder said anything about the pointlessly large spacing and unnecessary streams?

Shulin wrote:

if a lesson has been learned it is that people don't like super insane?

ouranhshc wrote:

i like everything the way it is

MaxwellDemon wrote:

Well, you are just only on your 2nd ranked maps. People makes mistakes here and there.

And truth to be told, most mappers don't learn their mistakes AFTER ranking anyway, regardless of the players. It is because when you first make that map, you can't help but to think that it is the best map you had made ever or something along the lines of that... it takes a few days or weeks until that veil goes away.

I can tell you that I think most mappers have a map that they wished they had done better on, so, don't fret, you are not the first one. Just keep mapping and improving on your techniques.

Xgor wrote:

The user rating isn't that bad.... (At least not that bad compared to Dicks are for my friend )