forum

Nightless Sane Mafia (Mafia Win.)

posted
Total Posts
481
show more
anonymous_old

0_o wrote:

-This post said we should assume adam is sane because he's the only cop left)
You've said yourself before that the town has no reason to lie. Explain?
I think he may have been joking. A few posts back I mentioned this.

EDIT:

strager wrote:

"Assume" joke [by Echo] I missed earlier.
Echo suggests we assume adam is Sane. What? I hope this was a joke. Otherwise, it's hypocrisy.
0_o

strager wrote:

0_o wrote:

-This post said we should assume adam is sane because he's the only cop left)
You've said yourself before that the town has no reason to lie. Explain?
I think he may have been joking. A few posts back I mentioned this.

EDIT:

strager wrote:

"Assume" joke [by Echo] I missed earlier.
Echo suggests we assume adam is Sane. What? I hope this was a joke. Otherwise, it's hypocrisy.
Why would it be hypocrisy?
Also, I'm pretty sure I also said at one point that adam is likely sane, the difference is I didn't know any better.
Echo
I was attempting to draw out contradictions from the mafia.
anonymous_old

0_o wrote:

Why would it be hypocrisy?
Also, I'm pretty sure I also said at one point that adam is likely sane, the difference is I didn't know any better.
The two posts:

viewtopic.php?p=168551#p168551

Echo wrote:

@everyone in general

when you assume, you make an ass of u and me

so please don't reply *for* anyone else
viewtopic.php?p=168567#p168567

Echo wrote:

Since he's the only cop left, can we assume he's sane? :P
0_o
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
anonymous_old

0_o wrote:

EDIT: oh, the assume thing
Yeah. My focuses on each of those were different.
Echo
Why do you think I italicised the word "assume" and used the :P smiley if I wasn't joking?
anonymous_old

Echo wrote:

Why do you think I italicised the word "assume" and used the :P smiley if I wasn't joking?
I assumed you were joking.
Echo
If I could set the expectation that adam was sane, then I might have gotten some interesting results which would counter my own investigations, and I would know who the mafia is.

Neither of you reacted in anyway when I said I investigated myself innocent and strager guilty. Were you both expecting it? Maybe you're both mafia. Maybe one of you is SK and the other mafia. Maybe you're siblings? Masons?
0_o
strager: how suspicious am I to you? I have a plan that depends on the answer to my question to LS about "unlynchable townie lynches", but it involves counting me out as mafia.

Honestly, I think my early claim as "Twilight Townie" should clear me altogether (now that we know Derekku was definitely a Twilight Brownie), but that's up to you I guess.

EDIT: response to Echo:
I didn't react because I already know one of you is mafia. It didn't really matter what you claimed really: if you told the truth then strager is mafia, if you are lying then you are mafia.
Now if you said I was guilty, then I would know you were mafia, and I would probably vote you then and there.

hmm...
anonymous_old
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
0_o
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Echo

0_o wrote:

Honestly, I think my early claim as "Twilight Townie" should clear me altogether (now that we know Derekku was definitely a Twilight Brownie), but that's up to you I guess.
If you bring up something you said earlier in the the game and use it as a defense for yourself, that kinda cancels it out in my opinion. Why did you need to bring it up at all? We should be able to see this for ourselves, we (at least I) do take the order of role claims into account.

0_o wrote:

Now if you said I was guilty, then I would know you were mafia, and I would probably vote you then and there.
Right here you sound suspiciously like what I was doing in my last games when I was mafia - using *know* as a reason for persuading other people of your innocence.

0_o wrote:

I only voted for Lucidity because there were 2 votes on adam, and I wasn't entirely sure that the deadline wasn't 3 minutes from that post, so basically I scrolled up and voted for the last person who got voted for, in an attempt to keep adam around.

Also, I realized now that I made a mistake, it's actually adam that will be lynched in the event of a tie right now (IM SORRY :cry:)

That said, I am more leaning towards voting Echo than strager, but I will vote for strager anyway and if Lucidity comes up and decides to change her vote to Echo, then I will too (I will be back to check in ~20 minutes)
You were really willing to lynch *anyone* as long as adam didn't die?

back in 3h
0_o

Echo wrote:

0_o wrote:

Honestly, I think my early claim as "Twilight Townie" should clear me altogether (now that we know Derekku was definitely a Twilight Brownie), but that's up to you I guess.
If you bring up something you said earlier in the the game and use it as a defense for yourself, that kinda cancels it out in my opinion. Why did you need to bring it up at all? We should be able to see this for ourselves, we (at least I) do take the order of role claims into account.
I wasn't the first person to bring this up, it's already been mentioned quite a few times throughout the thread (I can get examples on request)

Echo wrote:

0_o wrote:

Now if you said I was guilty, then I would know you were mafia, and I would probably vote you then and there.
Right here you sound suspiciously like what I was doing in my last games when I was mafia - using *know* as a reason for persuading other people of your innocence.
Not really sure what you mean by that, but what I said is true: I'm almost positive I'm not a miller (since Derekku was a Twilight Brownie and I'm not), and if you claimed you got a guilty result on me and innocent on yourself, you would be claiming sane cop. If I am who I claim I am, I would obviously know you were lying, hence mafia.

Echo wrote:

You were really willing to lynch *anyone* as long as adam didn't die?
Who would you rather lynch: someone without a roleclaim who could go either way, or an almost confirmed cop? I'm not really sure what you are accusing me of other than trying to keep the cop alive =/
anonymous_old
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
0_o
Also with regards to my claim: personally I don't think it would make a lot of sense for there to be a Twilight Brownie without a Twilight Townie (with the obvious play on words and everything), and seeing as I'm the only one who has claimed townie (the only other possible person would be SFG, but with her Pressured Doctor claim I doubt it), I really do believe I should be cleared here :|

Echo: what are your thoughts on your guilty result on strager?
0_o
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Echo

0_o wrote:

Echo: what are your thoughts on your guilty result on strager?
I think I'm lying.

I actually got a guilty result on 0_o, and an innocent on myself.

Let's consider this in conjunction with these two statements:

0_o wrote:

Yep. If you were to replace the word "Twilight" with "Vanilla" it would look exactly like a Vanilla Townie PM.

0_o wrote:

Now if you said I was guilty, then I would know you were mafia, and I would probably vote you then and there.
This assumes that I am a sane cop, which is reasonable given that my investigation flipped and that I got innocent on myself.

Assuming 0_o was innocent, then his role would be a vanilla townie, as per the first statement. In that case, my result will not change or be incorrect/opposite/etc. However, I got a guilty result on 0_o, who also said that if I got a guilty result on him then I would be mafia, which is a contradiction.

The fact that a contradiction came up means that something went wrong. My thought process is correct, which means my assumption is wrong.

In other words, I think 0_o is mafia. Q.E.D.
anonymous_old

Echo wrote:

Assuming 0_o was innocent, then his role would be a vanilla townie, as per the first statement. In that case, my result will not change or be incorrect/opposite/etc. However, I got a guilty result on 0_o, who also said that if I got a guilty result on him then I would be mafia, which is a contradiction.
That's not a contradiction.

To him, he is Innocent. You got a Guilty on him and claim to be Sane. Thus, he sees you are incorrect and are lying. Mafia.

Echo wrote:

The fact that a contradiction came up means that something went wrong. My thought process is correct, which means my assumption is wrong.
?

Echo wrote:

Q.E.D.
That's what?

Nice periods btw.

I'm highly skeptical of you. Why would you lie? I don't care if you wanted a reaction. adam was a Cop and he didn't lie. He used other means to get a reaction.
0_o
vote Echo
anonymous_old
Yeah...

Vote: Echo

A Townie has no reason to lie. A Cop, nonetheless.
0_o
BUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA







jk :P

Funny thing is I was actually starting to lean toward voting strager until Echo changed his story =/
Echo
AHAHAHAHAHA

Good game. My slightly more radical approach didn't quite work out, I see :P

Still, my "analysis" held up - I predicted day 1 that 0_o was likely mafia. Also funny how none of you two used the "if i'm not dead tomorrow i'm mafia" against me
anonymous_old

Echo wrote:

Still, my "analysis" held up - I predicted day 1 that 0_o was likely mafia.
I'm still interested in that analysis.

Echo wrote:

Also funny how none of you two used the "if i'm not dead tomorrow i'm mafia" against me
I ignored that.
anonymous_old
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Echo
When 0_o said "if you said I was guilty then I'd vote for you" it through me off a little, but after thinking it through my "proof" on the last page is actually logically sound and correct. Assuming I wasn't lying, of course, which I wasn't, but strager wouldn't know that.
anonymous_old

Echo wrote:

When 0_o said "if you said I was guilty then I'd vote for you" it through me off a little, but after thinking it through my "proof" on the last page is actually logically sound and correct. Assuming I wasn't lying, of course, which I wasn't, but strager wouldn't know that.
???

Also, *threw.
Echo
Yes I meant threw. I don't usually make synonym mistakes in spelling >.>

My reasoning on the last page is logically sound and is correct.
0_o

Echo wrote:

Also funny how none of you two used the "if i'm not dead tomorrow i'm mafia" against me
I was actually planning on bringing that up, as well as this:

Echo wrote:

Did anyone notice that in every game since the one where I was cop (m2?) I've been mafia?
Like seriously, WIFOM much? :P
anonymous_old
I still don't get it. =[ (EDIT: @Echo)
Echo
By assuming 0_o is innocent, I end up with a contradiction. Therefore, my assumption is wrong, or in other words 0_o is mafia.
anonymous_old
So who did you scan?

Or could you scan? ;P
Echo
d1: me, innocent
d2: didn't get a chance
d3: 0_o, guilty
0_o
wait hold on

we do know that I am NOT mafia, right? my post after strager voted was a joke...
anonymous_old
Echo, I was mainly asking for your logic here: viewtopic.php?p=169252#p169252

I know why you psuedovoted for 0_o Day 3.
anonymous_old

0_o wrote:

wait hold on

we do know that I am NOT mafia, right? my post after strager voted was a joke...
So you're kidding about kidding?
Derekku
If it hadn't been for those meddling kids, we would've voted for you D1 strager ffffffff

gg
Echo
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
anonymous_old
Get on #osu, Echo.
Yuukari-Banteki
can i post my real roles yet?
Derekku
Echo, 0_o most likely had a role like mine where he shows up as guilty, DUH.
Echo
can we stop the games with lame roles please

eg. where cops actually help mafia because of bad results

or at least let the people who are playing with roles like miller *know* that they're miller?
anonymous_old

Echo wrote:

or at least let the people who are playing with roles like miller *know* that they're miller?
Like CM1?
Echo
I think millers who don't know they're millers screw up the game.
anonymous_old

Echo wrote:

I think millers who don't know they're millers screw up the game.
Yeah, I think so.
Echo
btw if you are mafia in this game (@strager) then my theory is broken, for you at least. It holds for most of the past games.
Topic Starter
LadySuburu
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Echo
The setup was horribly unbalanced for town

strager - 100% against town

adam - 100% guilty results are on town
me - 67% guilty results are on town
lucidity - 50% chance killing town

sfg - has her own win condition

derek - .
0_o - .

That said, start a new balanced game already. Save me a spot :P
Topic Starter
LadySuburu
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Lucidity
Oh well gg :P

Insane doc is too random for my liking but that's life ;p
anonymous_old
I got lucky N1 when Lucidity killed adam, and I killed Lucidity. I knew she was the Doctor.

My Unlynchable claim worked out really well, too. I didn't care much about being lynched D1. (At least, I tried to make it seem that way.) If there was a no-lynch, the Mafia would go after me for the NK, but Lucidity would protect me. Thus, a free day for the Town!

Of course, that couldn't have worked, because I was the Mafia. ;P
Please sign in to reply.

New reply