Hm, who to vote for...to many people being inactive hurts this game from moving on so...
Vote: Neo@lex
Vote: Neo@lex
In this post you say that people who are inactive are usually innocent humans, but you don't seem to care if we vote them or not, seen as inDerekku Chan wrote:
Saying that someone is scum based on inactivity is WIFOM thinking. In every game I've been in so far, the inactive people have been innocent. I don't think someone with an important role like mafia/aux would be inactive. But who knows, it could be scum this time :<
Keeping my vote as is for now, though.
Also, you're really steadfast to tell everyone your vote for me still stands. Really, that's a very serious vote you have going there and I can't wait to see you say it's really gonna stay for a third/fourth time. Really, nothing scummy about that at all.Derekku Chan wrote:
But who knows, it could be scum this time :<
contradicts thisDerekku Chan wrote:
EDIT: Actually, it should've been implied by my most that I DO care if inactives are killed off. If they haven't posted, then we know nothing about them and thus shouldn't be lynched just for being inactive. We could by killing an important aux role.
since you obviously try to keep the votes here, and have a possible townie lynched offDerekku Chan wrote:
But who knows, it could be scum this time :<
Derekku Chan wrote:
I was just stating that I'm not going to change my vote to someone else.
Derekku Chan wrote:
Keeping my vote as is for now, though.
makes 3 times. we KNOW you won't change your vote by not changing your vote. Why so dedicated to making us know for sure?Derekku Chan wrote:
My vote for Wojjan still stands. :S
I have a habit of thinking of more things after hitting the post button XPWojjan wrote:
1) 3 edits. What the hell.
Uh, no it doesn't. Let me elaborate since you're obviously not understanding me. I said that we SHOULDN'T lynch someone JUST for being inactive. It SEEMS like the inactives are USUALLY innocent, but we don't know for sure. Do you get what I'm saying now?Wojjan wrote:
2)Thiscontradicts thisDerekku Chan wrote:
EDIT: Actually, it should've been implied by my most that I DO care if inactives are killed off. If they haven't posted, then we know nothing about them and thus shouldn't be lynched just for being inactive. We could by killing an important aux role.since you obviously try to keep the votes here, and have a possible townie lynched offDerekku Chan wrote:
But who knows, it could be scum this time :<
inb4WIFOM
The third one you pointed out was my vote for the day. The second one in your list is what I elaborated on in your first list item. I'm not "reinforcing" my vote, I'm just elaborating on it.Wojjan wrote:
also, thisDerekku Chan wrote:
I was just stating that I'm not going to change my vote to someone else.Derekku Chan wrote:
Keeping my vote as is for now, though.makes 3 times. we KNOW you won't change your vote by not changing your vote. Why so dedicated to making us know for sure?Derekku Chan wrote:
My vote for Wojjan still stands. :S
there's this handy thing called previewDerekku Chan wrote:
I have a habit of thinking of more things after hitting the post button XP
Uh, no it doesn't. Let me elaborate since you're obviously not understanding me. I said that we SHOULDN'T lynch someone JUST for being inactive. It SEEMS like the inactives are USUALLY innocent, but we don't know for sure. Do you get what I'm saying now?then why are you bringing it up in the first place? Simply to get us distracted from the case, as Bobby would put it.
I'm not "reinforcing" my vote, I'm just elaborating on it.you said the exact same 3 times. You vote for me. How is that elaborated?
Seriously, stop twisting my words around using these little word arguments. They're not helping your case and it's just making you look even more scummy :PYes, since pointing out the holes in your posts is obviously scummy and should be punished with my very life.
Wojjan wrote:
/sarcasm
Screw you, I have work.DeathxShinigami wrote:
Hm, who to vote for...to many people being inactive hurts this game from moving on so...
... and you haven't made a post since.Starrodkirby86 (day 2) wrote:
And I'm still yet to go make a vote. I have done some neglectfulness around, but I'll try and update myself fully into this world.
Iono - I don't think it is a definite scumtell since sometimes RL gets in the way and you don't want to make a 1 min post that makes no sense. It's slightly easier to just read and post a reply sometime when free time comes around.Echo wrote:
Lurking is a scumtell because by doing so you're avoiding talking (posting). And by doing that, people can't gather any information or evidence about said people, which means it's virtually impossible to get them lynched for anything except for lurking.
Unless its importance is higher than HIGH, I don't see why you only have time to post 4 times in this thread.neo@lex wrote:
Screw you, I have work.
Bandwagoning isn't really a way to tell scum in bigger Mafia games, since there exist roles as Masons, who know certain people which are human. Similar roles can be Siblings and Cults. There might be other, but those are the ones I can name from the top of my head.thepianist wrote:
But I feel that DeathxShinigami is bandwagoning on JInxyjem's post.
Vote DeathxShinigami
(at least for now.)
This begs the question - are you a mason, sibling, or cult member/leader? I'm sure you one of the above.Wojjan wrote:
Bandwagoning isn't really a way to tell scum in bigger Mafia games, since there exist roles as Masons, who know certain people which are human. Similar roles can be Siblings and Cults.
Rather than just "thinking it out thoroughly", why not post your thoughts and both give and gather more information that way instead?Starrodkirby86 wrote:
I have some faint thoughts of who I should vote for, but I'd rather think it out thoroughly before making a rash decision.
Everything about this game should have been in this thread only, so all you have to do is read through the last 15 posts or so.neo@lex wrote:
Has anyone tried personally asking thepianist stuff related to his spontaneous self-accusation?
Taking after me eh?LadySuburu wrote:
Day blah blah Night blah blah tomorrow at this time.
Blah.
This game is just Meh now.strager wrote:
Taking after me eh?LadySuburu wrote:
Day blah blah Night blah blah tomorrow at this time.
Blah.
I KNEW EET.Echo wrote:
Mafia Mason here
Psycho Doc = Serial Killerrust45 wrote:
I lost with the town as the Psychological Doctor.
Pretty big.0_o wrote:
soo... how about that role list?
Uh, no they're not >_>LadySuburu wrote:
Numbers are the slot which recieved the role, and anythig else not explainable is just my randomness when designing.
A little late on that one... :3thepianist wrote:
Err they don't match the front page though.
Oh well.