forum

ITT 2: We post shit that is neither funny nor interesting

posted
Total Posts
52,722
show more
Aurani
Get out of my ITT you shitposting twats
Meah
I decided to stop shitposting, it aint fun anymore
Mahogany
Serraionga
What Does ITT Mean? Sorry Im New xD
Meah
In this thread?
Lacrimae
pedophiles get out
Meah
let pedophiles in, it's easier for the police this way
Hika

Aurani wrote:

Get out of my ITT you shitposting twats
poor bb y r u mad
let me rub ur butt
B1rd
Apparently no one understands the meaning of nuance.

Anyway, this video is absolute gold

Aurani

Hika wrote:

poor bb y r u mad
let me rub ur butt
I'm sure your precious Madvillain would not appreciate it.
Taj

Mahogany wrote:

BrokenArrow wrote:

that
no it's not natural
Mahogany
paedophilia is anything but nuanced
Foxtrot

B1rd wrote:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2431924

"There is no evidence of an overall increase in congenital malformations among babies born to teenagers."
yeah but this doesn't even mention older women having higher chances of birth defects either, which is what you claimed. in fact, at one point this study suggested that teenagers have a harder time giving birth due to lower weight and undeveloped body. here, have a look at this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_and_female_fertility

"After puberty, female fertility increases and then decreases, with advanced maternal age causing an increased risk of female infertility."

it also mentions that fertility is at its peak during a woman's 20s because that's when their puberty ends. at one point you said that

So yes it is normal for men, even older men, to be attracted to 15 or 16 year old girls who've gone through puberty.
which is not true at all. some girls don't even start their periods at that age. you've gone through your puberty once you hit your early 20s, but at that age they're actually at their peak of puberty.
B1rd

Foxtrot wrote:

yeah but this doesn't even mention older women having higher chances of birth defects either, which is what you claimed. in fact, at one point this study suggested that teenagers have a harder time giving birth due to lower weight and undeveloped body. here, have a look at this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_and_female_fertility

"After puberty, female fertility increases and then decreases, with advanced maternal age causing an increased risk of female infertility."

it also mentions that fertility is at its peak during a woman's 20s because that's when their puberty ends. at one point you said that

So yes it is normal for men, even older men, to be attracted to 15 or 16 year old girls who've gone through puberty.
which is not true at all. some girls don't even start their periods at that age. you've gone through your puberty once you hit your early 20s, but at that age they're actually at their peak of puberty.
And yet that claim isn't even backed up by any sources in wikipedia, so it's null and void.

I didn't make any definite statements because I didn't have any evidence, basing the statement on something I read years ago. But it isn't particularly important that teenagers are more fertile than women in their 20s, because it is sufficient to back up my point that they are simply capable of reproduction, which is what the study I linked said. And if you read it carefully, it says that pregnancy only poses a problem for under 15 year olds, and lower birth weights can be attributed to differing socio-economic conditions. It doesn't matter if teenagers haven't finished puberty yet, they have most of their secondary sex characteristics, and are reproductively viable, and these are the things that are important for attractiveness.

The point is, there is nothing abnormal for men to merely be attracted to girls 15+.
DaddyCoolVipper

B1rd wrote:

It doesn't matter if teenagers haven't finished puberty yet, they have most of their secondary sex characteristics, and are reproductively viable, and these are the things that are important for attractiveness.
In your opinion, mate.

Maybe don't confuse your own preferences with whether or not something is normal for grown men in general. I wouldn't want to have anything to do with a fucking 15-year-old
Mahogany
nice
B1rd
Do you make it a point to be antagonistic about everything? Go vent your self-righteous moral outrage somewhere else.
Taj
intravenous custard is anything but a recipe
then you confused it with
a fucking poisonous fish

you can just go into a lake full of
piranhas

with anything
nothing better than cockroaches on a pizza
Mahogany

B1rd wrote:

Do you make it a point to be antagonistic about everything? Go vent your self-righteous moral outrage somewhere else.
imagine actually using this as a defense IRL
Foxtrot
But it isn't particularly important that teenagers are more fertile than women in their 20s, because it is sufficient to back up my point that they are simply capable of reproduction
thanks for stating the obvious. and also you seemed pretty fixated on fertility so that's why i pointed it out. oh, and by that logic, you'd probably think it's okay for men to go as low as 12 as long as they're capable of reproduction because it seems like nowadays the average age for first period is 12

http://www.obgyn.net/sexual-health/firs ... ical-signs

and you know, that's kind of awful

The point is, there is nothing abnormal for men to merely be attracted to girls 15+.
15 year old girls have such baby faces. they all look like kids. i would be really concerned if someone who's 25 was attracted to such.

[And yet that claim isn't even backed up by any sources in wikipedia, so it's null and void.
do you really need a source on biological clock lol c'mon
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply