dinkleberg
forum
Azis - Hop [Taiko]
posted
Total Posts
59
DeletedUser_6637817
Hey look a mod i didn't do in time
this song is hot
[Muzu]
02:09:608 - 02:12:465 - Add finishers? All diffs except this have finishers there
02:34:429 - How ahout changing to kat so you follow the trumpets better and make some variety?
02:09:608 - 02:12:465 - Add finishers? All diffs except this have finishers there
02:34:429 - How ahout changing to kat so you follow the trumpets better and make some variety?
[Gezo's Oni]
02:47:644 - Move to 02:47:286 - and change 02:47:822 (646) - to k? Vocals and drums land there lol
02:47:644 - Move to 02:47:286 - and change 02:47:822 (646) - to k? Vocals and drums land there lol
[Crystal's Inner Oni]
02:06:751 to 02:18:179 - It's fine as it is the highest diff, but I think the density gap in here compared to the Oni is too wide imo, so I'd recommend making a bit more 1/2 breaks and try to not use 1/8 triplets too much (screenshots for comparison)
00:12:376 - Change to k? sounds a bit better and it adds emphasis on the next section of the song
00:46:661 - 01:43:804 - ^
01:19:846 (4,5) - Ctrl+g? I think vocals are higher and the trumpet has the same tone as 01:19:727 -
01:23:894 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - How about making this the opposite colour? The vocals go lower compared to 01:21:036 - and it'd be nice so it isn't too repetitive
02:39:370 (1,2) - These notes aren't in 1/6, delete one and snap one back to 1/4 (02:39:429 - )
02:06:751 to 02:18:179 - It's fine as it is the highest diff, but I think the density gap in here compared to the Oni is too wide imo, so I'd recommend making a bit more 1/2 breaks and try to not use 1/8 triplets too much (screenshots for comparison)
SPOILER
A structure like this should be fine, you can come up with some variations laterOni
Inner
Inner
00:12:376 - Change to k? sounds a bit better and it adds emphasis on the next section of the song
00:46:661 - 01:43:804 - ^
01:19:846 (4,5) - Ctrl+g? I think vocals are higher and the trumpet has the same tone as 01:19:727 -
01:23:894 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - How about making this the opposite colour? The vocals go lower compared to 01:21:036 - and it'd be nice so it isn't too repetitive
02:39:370 (1,2) - These notes aren't in 1/6, delete one and snap one back to 1/4 (02:39:429 - )
this song is hot
@midnaait: yea
Topic Starter
Midnaait wrote:
Hey look a mod i didn't do in time[Muzu]
02:09:608 - 02:12:465 - Add finishers? All diffs except this have finishers there oops
02:34:429 - How ahout changing to kat so you follow the trumpets better and make some variety? yay[Crystal's Inner Oni]
02:06:751 to 02:18:179 - It's fine as it is the highest diff, but I think the density gap in here compared to the Oni is too wide imo, so I'd recommend making a bit more 1/2 breaks and try to not use 1/8 triplets too much (screenshots for comparison) I disagree. Considering the difficulty is considered as Inner Oni (let's ignore the BPM) some bigger jumps are possible. The Oni is designed corressponding to the Muzukashii (which was held VEEEEERY light and simple) and the continous mapping in Inner is pretty neat for that part.SPOILERA structure like this should be fine, you can come up with some variations laterOni
Inner
00:12:376 - Change to k? sounds a bit better and it adds emphasis on the next section of the song I like that pretty exotic rhythm Crystalloid used here. I think it can remain unchanged.
00:46:661 - 01:43:804 - ^ ^
01:19:846 (4,5) - Ctrl+g? I think vocals are higher and the trumpet has the same tone as 01:19:727 - fair
01:23:894 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - How about making this the opposite colour? The vocals go lower compared to 01:21:036 - and it'd be nice so it isn't too repetitive Not bad per se but I'll stick with k ddk.. since it works well.
02:39:370 (1,2) - These notes aren't in 1/6, delete one and snap one back to 1/4 (02:39:429 - ) ok
this song is hot
General
Unmei Muma to tags?
You can also move the background to -130 to make it centered https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/10851894 // https://gabe.s-ul.eu/gDEUf0mx
Muzukashii
Unmei Muma to tags?
You can also move the background to -130 to make it centered https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/10851894 // https://gabe.s-ul.eu/gDEUf0mx
Muzukashii
- 00:28:536 (7,8,9) - Personal opinion. While playing the first seconds of the difficulty, there was some easy build-ups that were consistent, but coming here, it gets uncomfortably dense because of the objects (7,8). What would u think of removing both of these objects to make it feel more consistent?
- 00:46:661 (1,2) - while I understand the reason why you didn't put a finish on the object (2) for simplicity and for the note's being projected, I believe it doesn't make it consistent with the next objects that gives emphasis to the vocals. Since there is nothing really worth emphasizing on 00:46:661 - , delete the object and add a finish to the next one. Apply the same thing to the next kiai.
Topic Starter
- added unmei muma to tags.
- used -115 instead, think it's better for most resolutions.
- removed (8,9) instead.
- done.
- used -115 instead, think it's better for most resolutions.
- removed (8,9) instead.
- done.
thats gay
Congratz. It is so great to know that after so many years your song choice is still gay :3
aleleli bahgggg
Hello, I would like to raise my concern regarding Muzukashii.
From 00:01:037 to 02:06:751 - there are no 3/2 or longer breaks within this 176/1 of patterning, which is way too long until a rest moment is placed after 02:06:751 - . I would strongly recommend you to insert some rests in between with reference to the break structure of your Futsuu. If you agree with this, I am willing to provide a mod to follow through.
From 00:01:037 to 02:06:751 - there are no 3/2 or longer breaks within this 176/1 of patterning, which is way too long until a rest moment is placed after 02:06:751 - . I would strongly recommend you to insert some rests in between with reference to the break structure of your Futsuu. If you agree with this, I am willing to provide a mod to follow through.
Topic Starter
Considering how simple the Muzukashii is (longest combo pattern is 00:44:251 - 00:46:751 - ) and how many 1/1 breaks I use, I don't see the need of even longer breaks. It is a muzukashii difficulty after all, it is an easier one simply because it was meant to be designed like that.
Hi.
I'm personally fine with the breaks in the Muzukashii. Due to the very low BPM and elevated SV, the map plays more or less like a low density 168bpm map with very frequent 2/1 breaks. As such, in my opinion, it falls well within the rankable range.
I'm personally fine with the breaks in the Muzukashii. Due to the very low BPM and elevated SV, the map plays more or less like a low density 168bpm map with very frequent 2/1 breaks. As such, in my opinion, it falls well within the rankable range.
I would agree that the BPM is low, but my concern is more about the uneven arrangement of breaks compared to 02:06:751 - onward. The frequent use of 2/1 and 3/2 breaks from 02:06:751 to 03:03:894 - makes the first two minutes of consecutive patterns rather unnatural. It also results in inconsistency with the even distribution of breaks in Futsuu. Therefore, some 3/2 breaks could be used for the first two minutes for the sake of a more coherent break structure.
176/1 without 3/2 breaks at 168bpm 
that reminds me of a map that got diqualified for much less than that haHA
keep bullshiting QATs
edit : in case i made it ambiguous, this of course does NOT require a disqualification or even a discussion
that reminds me of a map that got diqualified for much less than that haHA
keep bullshiting QATs
edit : in case i made it ambiguous, this of course does NOT require a disqualification or even a discussion
Would you stop posting with such a bad attitude and keep the discussion constructive instead? Beatmap threads are supposed to be used to discuss anything related to the map but not a place to post your biased opinion towards QATs.Nofool wrote:
176/1 without 3/2 breaks at 168bpm
that reminds me of a map that got diqualified for much less than that haHA
keep bullshiting QATs
Gabe wrote:
thats gay
Topic Starter
there is no need to be aggressive.Nofool wrote:
176/1 without 3/2 breaks at 168bpm
that reminds me of a map that got diqualified for much less than that haHA
keep bullshiting QATs
edit : in case i made it ambiguous, this of course does NOT require a disqualification or even a discussion
Anyway, talked to Nardo,
gz steffy <3