-Bakari- wrote:

osu! needs official Azis fan club.

bbj0920 wrote:

Hi, from my modding queue.

Light OniZoda

SPOILER

00:30:459 (148) - k Look at the overall structure of the whole pattern, you'll notice that it's d d x k d d x k 1/4 at 00:29:566 (142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151) - . I'd rather keep that so it's consistent and varying
00:34:923 (170) - K for the drums I'd rather keep the big notes focused more on the "hop" throughout the song
01:09:565 (312) - D ^
01:32:066 (392) - k welp here I'd rather keep d k ddd k d, due to that light Oni being an Oni with lots of Muzukashii attributes. dammit crystal
02:28:852 (588) - K same as ^x2, focusing on big notes on "hop"

Lolwut, it's Azis.. www

• 00:07:066 (16) - Hier würde ich ein d hinsetzen. Hört sich imo so leer an.
  
  00:44:387 - d für vocals (hast dich vorher auch an den vocals orientiert)
  
  01:13:137 - dasselbe wie bei 00:07:066 (16) -
  
  02:40:102 (10) - k (ddkkd) damit nicht 2mal dasselbe pattern kommt. Hört sich in der Kombination imo auch cool an.

• 00:37:602 - Delete this note. There is nothing at this point. And the vocals are more pronounced.
  
  00:39:923 - Fill this (snare) with k or d. Or you could make a ddkkd pattern starting here: 00:39:744 (185) -
  This happens several times but i think it isn't necessary to fill all of it. At this point it is because you can hear it better (louder snare).
  
  00:49:030 (220) - Fill this (vocals)
  
  Found nothing else here. Nice diff.

• 00:37:601 - Delete. Nothing there and vocals get pronounced better.
  
  02:08:851 (1) - k (le weird instrument plays)
  
  That's all i could find. Nice Diff, too.

bbj0920 wrote:

Hi, from my modding queue.

Muzu

SPOILER

00:07:066 (16) - d Seems fine.
00:28:673 - Add a note, d or k No. The reason behind is that I don't purposed to set 1/4 circles at these hits like on this time. The Triplets (?) here should only be for the sounds like 00:24:566 (3,4,5).
00:49:566 (41) - D I don't want to use for every "Hop!" a D. v:
01:00:994 (15) - ^ <- Like this, how about adding a finisher on 'Hop!' part? (on where you want to add finisher) ^
02:22:959 - Add a note, d
Overall, it's too easy for Muzu.. I can rename it Futsuu Don't forget it's 84 BPM, it unfortunately doesn't sounds like 84 BPM but well.. however, it's mapped related to 84 BPM.

Crystal's Taiko Oni

SPOILER

00:53:315 (2) - k Needs to change a huge part of the map then.
01:20:993 (4) - K Doesn't really sounds significant tbh.
01:28:851 (1,3) - k Changed.
02:18:135 (1) - D Seems fine to do this.

Lolwut, it's Azis.. www

Onicorn wrote:

Hallo.Bin wegen m4m hier. Ich werde den Muzu-Mod auf Deutsch und die anderen beiden auf Englisch schreiben.

Höchstwahrscheinlich wird der Mod sowohl qualitativ als auch von der Länge her nicht an deinen herankommen. Tut mir leid. Jedoch werde ich mein bestes geben .


Muzukashii

• 00:07:066 (16) - Hier würde ich ein d hinsetzen. Hört sich imo so leer an. Changed.
  
  00:44:387 - d für vocals (hast dich vorher auch an den vocals orientiert) Yes
  
  01:13:137 - dasselbe wie bei 00:07:066 (16) - Done.
  
  02:40:102 (10) - k (ddkkd) damit nicht 2mal dasselbe pattern kommt. Hört sich in der Kombination imo auch cool an. Okay.

Crystal's Oni

• 00:37:601 - Delete. Nothing there and vocals get pronounced better. removed.
  
  02:08:851 (1) - k (le weird instrument plays) Added k to the circle before
  
  That's all i could find. Nice Diff, too.

I hope there is at least one thing that helps. If not i'll shoot a star. Even though i don't like..erm hate the song.
Onicorn runs

Onicorn wrote:

Sorry for my bad english :/ it's okay

• 00:37:602 - Delete this note. There is nothing at this point. And the vocals are more pronounced. actually it's to emphasize the [sh] sound, as well as transition mapping as I always do.
  
  00:39:923 - Fill this (snare) with k or d. Or you could make a ddkkd pattern starting here: 00:39:744 (185) -
  This happens several times but i think it isn't necessary to fill all of it. At this point it is because you can hear it better (louder snare). I'd rather have omissions, despite all the snare, so it grooves more than the song actually can permit. The song's drum pattern is really simple, I just want to make due of that to add in my "own beats". And I think it doesn't play that bad, because you can still play that note while it isn't here
  
  00:49:030 (220) - Fill this (vocals) I don't really see why
  
  Found nothing else here. Nice diff.

Nwolf wrote:

[Gesho's Light Oni]

00:12:334 (55,56) - Delete 55 and change 56 to big don for da emphasis (see 00:23:852 (113) - ) as i said in another mod reply, the big notes are almost only for "hop"
00:14:209 (63) - Delete this note too because 00:17:066 - rip 00:19:923 - rip 00:22:780 - rip k (slap 1)
00:29:209 (140) - Change to kat to keep the kat rhythm consistent :3 (also fits that... instrument) changed, incidentally changed 138 because consistencylol
00:46:619 (211,212) - Same as 55/56 moved it to have k ddd kkk D
00:49:030 (220) - Move that note to 00:49:030 (220) - for the vocals, you seem to follow it a bit (especially in the next bar) yes and no, I'm having mixed mapping here, following basically everything at the same time, and want something which doesn't stick to the song perfectly but be different
01:00:458 (270) - ^
01:46:173 (440) - ^
01:57:601 (490) - ^ you will notice all end up with 0
02:18:494 (545) - Same as 63 slap 2
02:37:780 (618) - Think for the "hey" a Kat would be nice again yes


good luck :3

lkx_Shore wrote:

aleileilei pa~

_Gezo_ wrote:

lkx_Shore wrote:

aleileilei pa~

wrong song

guro wrote:

Helloo

Stefan asked me to mod something so here goes

[Inner Oni]

00:04:387 (1,1,2,3) - 00:07:244 (1,2,1,1) - and 00:10:101 (1,2,3,1) - are kinda repetitive and not very exciting to look at. I suggest changing them to ddkk, kkdd and ddkd respectively. The ddkd on 00:10:101 (1,2,3,1) - fits well because of the kkdk you put 00:10:994 (2,1,2,3) - here, I think. You have a good point, however I decided to change it alternatively for first and third to dkdk. I think it's good to have them similar but NOT the same pattern.

00:12:423 (4) - to 00:35:280 (4) - is fairly repetitive aswell. I would settle for variety pattern-wise rather than musical accuracy. The kkd and kdkdk fits the music, but repeating it over and over makes this part lose its appeal. Same applies to the kiais, basically. I don't think he made much wrong with staying on a repeating pattern structure but I understand your point. I added some notes here and there so it doesn't feel THAT repetitive but doesn't alter his concept too much.

01:09:566 (1,2) - noticed that one late, but see below for my suggestion. That one is fine..?

01:12:423 (1,2) - feels awkward, since there's no sound on 01:12:601 (2) - .
I suggest changing it to something like

without any finisher, since merely moving 01:12:601 (2) - to 01:12:780 (2) - would introduce a weird gap. went with dkd instead.

01:15:459 (2) - same as above ~

01:16:887 (2) - again. ~

Other than that, I think it's well done!

Nepuri wrote:

Hi!

[General]

[Futsuu]

In the kiais, id suggest you emphasize every "Hop" with a finisher evenly; Right now only every 2 Phrase is emphasized by a don finisher, leaving 00:49:566 (23) - these notes without a finish. Imo itd give a more regular emphasis to it than right now and itd fit well considering the current finisher structure. Done.

02:40:994 - This has very similar musical structure to the kiais, but has accents on the red ticks where they dont fit very much with the vocals (which have been prioritized before). I suggest you move 02:42:780 (2,3) - around that they do not interfere with the vocals that should be in focus here.
If im wrong, correct me! The only reason I went with these pattern is the pretty long break, but I changed the pattern accordingly to the vocals.

Otherwise its clean afaic!

[Muzukashii]

Looks pretty clean to me, and in line with spread to futsuu!

Please do call me back, im interested in nominating this if top 2 diffs are good!

Nepuri wrote:

Back!

[Muzukashii]

I forgot to mention the same finisher issue with Futsuu here, you might wanna change it here aswell! fair

[Crystal's Inner Oni]

From 00:00:994 - 00:12:423 - Imho you could focus on the ting drum sounds that you can hear at 00:02:066 - ; 00:02:423 - etc very clearly. Currently they have been overheard or ignored for another rhythm that sounds way less fitting to what the drums provide. made some slight changes for kat notes and tried to keep Crystal's stuff as untouched as possible. hope that works.

00:34:209 (2) - change to kat to differentiate it from all the dons surrounding it? A clear clap is audible here and not using it to vary from the lots of dons around it makes it sound stale. Yeah, overlooked that note.

00:36:530 (1) - change to don as the music actually takes a rest here for a moment and a kat would not be necessary to emphasize this? Sounds kind of oversaturated if theres 3 kats in a row. done, applied for similar stuff yadda

01:18:851 (5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - for this id suggest a kkdkkdkkdk to reflect the pitch better went with kkdkkdk, Crystal used this pattern before.

Similar goes to 02:30:280 (3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - making it a kddkddk for pitch relevance. Also stood with kkdkkdk and made 02:35:994 (3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - a bit different.



Call me back!

Nepuri wrote:

[Oni]
01:26:709 (368) - Could make it a kat to create similarity in color to 01:27:423 (371,372,373) - as the triplet relates to the vocals, which also sound on this note.

Gezoda wrote:

thanks back

Midnaait wrote:

Hey look a mod i didn't do in time

[Muzu]

02:09:608 - 02:12:465 - Add finishers? All diffs except this have finishers there oops
02:34:429 - How ahout changing to kat so you follow the trumpets better and make some variety? yay

[Crystal's Inner Oni]

02:06:751 to 02:18:179 - It's fine as it is the highest diff, but I think the density gap in here compared to the Oni is too wide imo, so I'd recommend making a bit more 1/2 breaks and try to not use 1/8 triplets too much (screenshots for comparison) I disagree. Considering the difficulty is considered as Inner Oni (let's ignore the BPM) some bigger jumps are possible. The Oni is designed corressponding to the Muzukashii (which was held VEEEEERY light and simple) and the continous mapping in Inner is pretty neat for that part.

SPOILER

Oni
Inner

A structure like this should be fine, you can come up with some variations later


00:12:376 - Change to k? sounds a bit better and it adds emphasis on the next section of the song I like that pretty exotic rhythm Crystalloid used here. I think it can remain unchanged.
00:46:661 - 01:43:804 - ^ ^
01:19:846 (4,5) - Ctrl+g? I think vocals are higher and the trumpet has the same tone as 01:19:727 - fair
01:23:894 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - How about making this the opposite colour? The vocals go lower compared to 01:21:036 - and it'd be nice so it isn't too repetitive Not bad per se but I'll stick with k ddk.. since it works well.
02:39:370 (1,2) - These notes aren't in 1/6, delete one and snap one back to 1/4 (02:39:429 - ) ok

this song is hot

1. 00:28:536 (7,8,9) - Personal opinion. While playing the first seconds of the difficulty, there was some easy build-ups that were consistent, but coming here, it gets uncomfortably dense because of the objects (7,8). What would u think of removing both of these objects to make it feel more consistent?

1. 00:46:661 (1,2) - while I understand the reason why you didn't put a finish on the object (2) for simplicity and for the note's being projected, I believe it doesn't make it consistent with the next objects that gives emphasis to the vocals. Since there is nothing really worth emphasizing on 00:46:661 - , delete the object and add a finish to the next one. Apply the same thing to the next kiai.

Nofool wrote:

176/1 without 3/2 breaks at 168bpm

that reminds me of a map that got diqualified for much less than that haHA

keep bullshiting QATs

Gabe wrote:

thats gay

Nofool wrote:

176/1 without 3/2 breaks at 168bpm

that reminds me of a map that got diqualified for much less than that haHA

keep bullshiting QATs



edit : in case i made it ambiguous, this of course does NOT require a disqualification or even a discussion