forum

Ryu* Vs. L.E.D.-G Vs. ZUN - PARADISE GHOST

posted
Total Posts
77
Topic Starter
Pokie
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on 2012年12月23日 at 3:26:51

Artist: Ryu* Vs. L.E.D.-G Vs. ZUN
Title: PARADISE GHOST
Tags: No_Gu gudbye Byakko+ RandomBemani Mash-up bemani beatmania IIDX 18 Resort Anthem PARADISE LOST Touhou Hiroari Shoots a Strange Bird ~ Till When? Konpaku Youmu
BPM: 100
Filesize: 3724kb
Play Time: 02:06
Difficulties Available:
  1. Another (4.93 stars, 368 notes)
  2. Beginner (1.76 stars, 94 notes)
  3. Extra (5 stars, 578 notes)
  4. Hyper (4.72 stars, 291 notes)
  5. Normal (3.58 stars, 152 notes)
Download: Ryu* Vs. L.E.D.-G Vs. ZUN - PARADISE GHOST
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
Ryu☆ Vs. L.E.D.-G Vs. ZUN - PARADISE GHOST Mash-up by Byakko+

Original Theme: Ryu☆ Vs. L.E.D.-G - PARADISE LOST (http://osu.ppy.sh/s/38043 by ignorethis)




===
Beginner - Easy, by me
Standard - Normal, by me
Hyper - Hard, by No_Gu
Another - Insane, by me
Extra - Streams, by me

Last full-submit: 4th Dec
mintong89
1st~ :D
占沙发!
Mei_coN
好吧,我板凳233
Ulysses
wa
Garven
Quick IRC mod.

Nice set :3

SPOILER
11:18 Garven: 00:19:208 (1) - Too soon after spinner~
11:18 Garven: Beginner
11:18 Pokie: ;w; really?!
11:19 Garven: Give around 4 beats at this BPM
11:19 Pokie: ehhhhh!!
11:19 Garven: AR +1, OD +2/3
11:20 Pokie: =3= okke
11:20 Pokie: AR3 OD2 atm
11:20 Garven: 00:24:008 (1) - Maybe silence sliderslide for the rest of the map? Sounds like D:
11:21 Garven: Well, I guess during the loud parts it's not that bad
11:21 Pokie: umm maybe not, ticks are silent now
11:21 Pokie: ;w;
11:21 Garven: ..oh
11:21 Garven: nevermind then
11:22 Pokie: and I forgot to reduce the volume of SC2 slidertick~ weeee
11:22 *Pokie runs
11:22 Garven: 01:45:008 (4,1,1) - Please do'nt do this in an Easy D:
11:22 Pokie: ;w;
11:23 Pokie: okay
11:25 Garven: 00:56:108 (2,3,4) - I am kind of wary of stacks of 1/2s like this. To the newer player it might look like just a giant pile of notes - especially
11:25 Garven: at this AR.
11:25 Garven: (Normal)
11:25 Garven: Speaking of, OD +2/3
11:26 Pokie: aw OD mistakes :P
11:27 Pokie: 1/2 removed ;w;?
11:27 Garven: Hm
11:27 Garven: Maybe find a different way to map them?
11:27 Garven: Just as a stack, it looks so imposing, haha
11:27 Pokie: okay
11:30 Garven: Hm. I was going to recommend AR -1 on Hyper until I got to 00:39:608 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - orz
11:31 Pokie: me too ^q^..
11:31 Garven: 01:12:008 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - new comboooooooos
11:32 Pokie: lets kill no_gu
11:32 *Garven readies knife
11:32 Pokie: I got 5 misses with AR7 lol
11:32 Pokie: wwww
11:32 Garven: 01:39:608 (1) - eew
11:32 Garven: eeeeew
11:33 Pokie: wwwwwww
11:33 Pokie: kind of insect, maybe
11:33 Garven: Smash that insect :x
11:33 Garven: And OD +1
11:34 Pokie: He asked for OD6, maybe I'll just keep it
11:34 Pokie: =w=
11:34 Garven: Too low against the high AR
11:34 Pokie: ;w;
11:34 Garven: Makes it too easy q:
11:35 Pokie: okay, I'll tell him
11:35 Garven: Another: 00:28:808 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - D:
11:35 Garven: I had to play it a few times before I was able to read it okay
11:35 Pokie: \^q^/
11:35 *Pokie changes
11:38 Garven: 02:03:908 (2) - This repeat arrow is fairly covered by 02:03:008 (5,7) - 's hitbursts
11:39 Garven: Extra:
11:39 Garven: 00:28:958 (1,2,3,4) - This spacing plays really strange
11:40 Garven: You lose tension when you go from high-speed to low speed like that with no real change in the music
11:41 Pokie: You read that? =w=b
11:41 Pokie: All fixed
11:42 Garven: 01:37:808 (4) - Repeat hidden under hitburst
11:42 Pokie: ;w; ehhh kore mo dame?!
11:42 Garven: gomen :<
11:43 Pokie: done
11:43 Garven: 01:45:308 (11,12,13,14,1) - Move down and right to adjust for stacking
11:43 Garven: Watch in test play mode to see what I mean
11:43 Pokie: okay
11:44 Garven: 02:06:008 (1) - use soft sound please!
11:45 Garven: 01:46:808 - Surprised there's no kiai here
11:46 Pokie: umm...I acutally doubt on either adding or not
11:46 *Garven shrugs
11:46 Garven: It's a pretty intense part of the song - just expected it hehe
11:46 Pokie: =3= okay
11:46 Garven: owari~
Verdisphena
Cool map <3
Gabi
Extra is a great stream map, your patterns are good and jumps that matter are consistant, although i would have liked to see more 3/4 towards the end :(.

Since your Extra diff have notes put on almost all the beats, this 01:52:658 (7) - part feels a bit empty. How about adding a note there?

Example/
Topic Starter
Pokie

Gabi wrote:

Extra is a great stream map, your patterns are good and jumps that matter are consistant, although i would have liked to see more 3/4 towards the end :(.

Since your Extra diff have notes put on almost all the beats, this 01:52:658 (7) - part feels a bit empty. How about adding a note there?

Example/
Fixed that stuff~ but on another place XD So the combo burst won't interfere next triples 01:53:258 (2,3,4) -
And..yea, this song should be filled with 3/4 rhythms, that I'm not be able to handle it well with such BPM :P So I chose an easier way to finish.
I apologize for this. And thanks for star <3

Verdisphena wrote:

Cool map <3
Thank you :oops: ~
UnitedWeSin
Hello~
Modding via forum pm request from Pokie-sama. ;)
All suggestions, opinions, that stuff.
The Extra is a bit hard for me so I don't think I'll be much help there, and by a bit I mean a lot.

I don't really care for this song, so sorry if this isn't that helpful.

[General]

Nothing to say.

[Easy]

00:24:008 - Are you sure you want to have this SV change in a beginner diff?

00:28:808 (1) - I think we should stick with the same pattern here as before since the verse is just repeated again. Increase the length of this slider to 00:30:008 and then delete 00:30:008 (2). This way we have a repeating pattern with 00:24:008 (1,2) which beginners will enjoy and be able to read easily.

00:35:408 (3,4) - Please avoid this stacking in a beginner map. A new player will not be able to read it, they will think they need to mash the key really fast over these notes or something. They'll miss and will hate your map. Why can't we just do the same thing we've done until now? 00:30:608 (2) like this, these sliders work very well.
00:37:808 (3,4) - ^

01:04:808 (1,2) - Can't say I like this flow, it should be more like this IMO.

Here we can have the 01:04:808 (1) blanketing the 01:07:208 (1) and we can avoid them overlapping which is nice.

01:14:408 (1,2,3,1) - I think we should try and avoid all of this overlap. The beginner would enjoy a beatmap more if it has them moving more around the screen IMO. I also think we should make 01:18:008 (2,3) flow towards the center of the screen to setup for the spinner. I believe this will help a beginning player notice it faster. Can you rearrange 01:14:408 (1,2) so we can accomplish that?

01:18:908 (3) - Maybe make this two circles instead of a slider? That way we could hit a circle on the downbeat 01:19:208 to kickstart that stream which would feel nice.

01:50:708 (2) - No reason for the repeat here. You should just repeat the same pattern that you did at 01:46:808 (1,2). Like this?

Doesn't that flow nice? You could have the 01:48:308 (2) aiming at the 01:49:208 (1).

02:00:908 (3) - Just delete this note. It stacks with 02:01:208 (1) and it breaks the pattern before it even though were in the same verse here. :cry:
Do not stack like this in beginner please. Especially at this BPM.

02:03:008 (4,5) - Lets rethink this. Wouldn't it feel more powerful to hit a circle on the downbeat at 02:03:608 instead of a slider end? Plus we could have a new combo there... It would be so much better. Please switch the positions of the 4 and 5 so we can have this nice pattern here:

02:01:208 (1) to 02:06:008 (1)
NC at 02:03:608 and 02:06:008
Isn't that a much more epic way to end the song than a slider end with no NC?

[Standard]

It's a great map, so just suggestions.

Are you sure about all of this overlap? Don't you think it might be a bit confusing for players at this level?
00:23:708 (1) - Remove this circle? It's just messing up the combos here and it's fine without it.

00:24:908 (2,1,2,3,4,1) - Ugh...Don't you think this is all just really messy? Wouldn't it have been better like this?:

The 00:24:908 (2) isn't intruding on the 00:25:208 (1,2,3,4) combo, but is instead leading into it. The 00:26:408 (1) is stacked on the 00:25:208 (1) which looks nice and is intuitive to read. You can stack the 00:27:308 (2) onto the 4 to flow out of the combo and into the next.

00:27:608 (1,2,3,4,1) - Same thing here. Isn't it better like this?:

Stack the 00:28:808 (1) on the 00:27:608 (1)

00:54:008 (1) - Why not stack on the 00:52:808 (1) and have it flow through the 00:53:108 (2) into the 00:54:608 (2)?

I feel like we should have circles at 01:38:108 and 01:40:508 so here's what I suggest.
Then stack the 01:39:908 (2) on the 01:38:108 (3) and go from there.

02:03:608 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - Why not more like this?

Doesn't it look cleaner? :cry:

[Hyper]

00:04:808 (1,2,3) - The polarity is bad. Can we fix it? Something like this makes more sense IMO:

00:04:808 (1) to 00:06:608 (5)

00:36:308 (2) - This slider is nice, but it's just too hard to tell that it's one whole beat, where as the slider before it was only one half. 90% of players will get a 100 or miss when they hit the 00:36:758 (3) early. You should make this slider more obvious.

00:39:308 (4) - Ctrl-g this please so we get to flow into the 00:39:608 (1,2,3,4,5) combo nicely. It's already difficult enough. :cry:

00:43:058 (4) - Make this two circles IMO. One at 00:43:058 and a NC one at 00:43:208 on that nice downbeat before the pause.

00:44:408 (1) - What's with this? Wouldn't it feel nicer to just have a pause until 00:45:608 and then start the combos on that accented downbeat there?
As of now you have the verse starting with this slider end and a pause after it... Why?

01:10:808 (1,2,3,4) - This rhythm fits much better like this:

01:10:808 (1) to 01:12:008 (1)

01:21:308 (4,1,2,3,4) - Again I think these combos are just too hard when the previous slider flows away from them. Just ctrl-g all of 01:20:408 (1,2,3,4) so that 01:21:308 (4) can flow into those circles.

01:22:808 (1,2,3,4,5) - I don't agree with this, it just feels awkward to play. Can you try something like this instead?

01:39:608 (1) - What's with this insanely awkward jump and slider with 2 repeats on it? The 01:38:408 (1,2,3,4,5,1) should be making a curved pattern and then we should have this rhythm that's nice and easy to read.

I still don't really like it though. You can think of something better.


01:41:858 (2,1) - Is it alright that these sliders are completely overlapped? I thought that was unrankable.

01:52:208 (1) - Remove NC
01:52:808 (3) - NC

01:55:208 (1) - Why are there so many repeats on this slider it plays so bad. :cry: You have the new verse starting on the slider end because of this at 01:56:408 and it feels terrible. Isn't this better and cleaner to play?

02:00:008 (1,2,3,4,5) - This plays awful IMO. Honestly I think you should replace it with two large 1 beat sliders.

02:03:608 (1,2) - :cry:

[Another]

The spacing can be a bit ridiculous at times IMO.

00:25:508 (5,6,7) - Why does spacing increase so much here? There is no change in the music.

00:40:208 (5,6,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - It would be better if they were forming some sort of a pattern, or were stacking on previous notes. It feels like a lot of them are placed randomly and is really difficult to play.

00:52:658 (3,4) - :cry: With the previous 1 and 2, I'm expecting this 3 to fall on the downbeat, but instead it falls on the red tick before it. It's super confusing and feels terrible to play. Just remove the 3.

01:48:008 (1,2,3,4) - See wouldn't it feel nicer if these flowed out of the previous 01:47:708 (4) a little better?

You should think more about patterns and stacking on previous notes in this diff IMO.

[Extra]

:cry:
Don't think I can help you much here. Sorry.


Anyways. I hope this is helpful. :)
Thanks for requesting a mod. I'll leave star. <3
NewRulerNA
hi
今回は日本語でModしています
もしわからなければフォーラムPMを送ってきてください

I modded in Japanese. if you are not able to understand it, send me forum PM.

[General]
  1. "soft-slidertick2-old1.wav"が使われている形跡がありませんが、これは必要でしょうか?
    私にはこれが不要なファイルのように思えました
[Beginner]
  1. 00:02:408 - なぜここからnoteを置いていないのでしょうか?
    ここからnoteを置くことが可能で、わざと異なる開始位置を持たせる必要性を感じませんでした
  2. 00:20:408 (1) - このnoteの中央にスピナーによるヒットバーストが発生し、短時間とはいえ最低難易度で被るのが私には悪く思えました
    画像のような流れを持たせて被らないようにさせてみてはどうでしょうか?
  3. 00:24:008 (1,2) - この部分の流れを今よりよくできそうな提案
    (3,1)を調節して(2)を今よりフォローした配置にすることでより良い流れを作ることができます
  4. 00:35:408 (3,4) - remove whistle?
    00:30:608 (3) との音取りの一貫性がないのが私には気になりました
  5. 01:39:608 (3,1) - ヒットバーストの被りに関して
    ひとつの提案としてこんな流れはどうでしょう
    ただ01:40:808 (1,2)の部分の距離が極端に開いてしまい、スライダーの形に関して調節が必要となってしまいます
  6. 01:49:208 (1,1) - 細かな部分に関しての調節案
    被っていないほうが見た目的にも良くなります
[Standard]
  1. 00:24:908 (3,1,2,3,4) - この箇所がARの関係でかなり見難くなっています
    (1,2)の部分を1/1スライダーに変更等をして少しnoteを減らし、見やすさを確保させるべきです
    ARを上げればそれである程度は解決するのですが、Beginnerとの難易度のバランス的にその変更を提案することが難しいのでこの改善案を出しました
  2. 00:39:608 (2,2,1,2) - ヒットサウンドに関しての提案
    00:39:608 (2) - finishを開始に追加
    00:41:408 (2) - ^
    00:42:008 (1,2) - finishを終わりにも追加
    曲に対してヒットサウンドの存在が地味だったので、finishを強調する方が曲に合うように思えました
  3. 01:20:408 (2) - スライダーエンドがnormal-hitnormalなのはわざと?
    私にはここはsoft-hitfinishのほうが曲とこの前後の音付けのほうが合うように思えました
  4. 01:37:508 (2) - 見た目に関しての改善案
    丸の中心に向かって伸びるスライダーのほうが見た目を良く、バランスを保つことができます
  5. 01:39:908 (2) - ^
[Hyper]
  1. 00:33:308 (4) - reverse arrow touch HP bar. This is little hard to see.
    should few grid down.
  2. 00:59:108 (2,3) - dont like this flow.....
    I suggest this.
  3. 01:14:708 (2,3) - ^
  4. 01:39:608 (1) - I think this slider make confuse player.
    seemed hold slider.....
  5. 01:54:908 (4,1) - this also make confuse. second reverse arrow is hidden by hitburst of 01:54:908 (4).
    it may be rankable, but should be fix
[Another]
  1. 01:19:208 (3) - これをnazi modだと言うかも知れません・・・・が、私には緑線の影響で01:18:608 (1,2,3)の実際の距離が異なっていることが気になりました
  2. 01:40:208 - add note?
    今の状態でも問題はないのですが、私にはここにnoteを置くことが可能であるように思えました
    これは好みの問題なので変更はしなくて構いません
[Extra]
  1. 00:53:708 (5) - 直前のスタックのズレによりリバースアローがほぼ隠れて、キックスライダー最初のリバースを確認することが困難であるように思えます
    これはRankableの可能性は十分にありますが、これが私には不安な要素のように思えました
  2. 01:17:706 (7) - snapしていません

gl
Topic Starter
Pokie
Will do it asap, Thanks :D
Topic Starter
Pokie
UnitedWeSin

UnitedWeSin wrote:

Hello~
Modding via forum pm request from Pokie-sama. ;)
All suggestions, opinions, that stuff.
The Extra is a bit hard for me so I don't think I'll be much help there, and by a bit I mean a lot.

I don't really care for this song, so sorry if this isn't that helpful.

First of all, thanks for taking my request. This modding really helps, don't be worry about that.

[General]

Nothing to say.

[Easy]

00:24:008 - Are you sure you want to have this SV change in a beginner diff? Yes, I doubt on speed changes for quite a while. But you already knew the result :P

00:28:808 (1) - I think we should stick with the same pattern here as before since the verse is just repeated again. Increase the length of this slider to 00:30:008 and then delete 00:30:008 (2). This way we have a repeating pattern with 00:24:008 (1,2) which beginners will enjoy and be able to read easily.

 Pretty nice, done.

00:35:408 (3,4) - Please avoid this stacking in a beginner map. A new player will not be able to read it, they will think they need to mash the key really fast over these notes or something. They'll miss and will hate your map. Why can't we just do the same thing we've done until now? 00:30:608 (2) like this, these sliders work very well.
00:37:808 (3,4) - ^

 Done for these two, too. That was basically fine to have stacks in Easy, but due to such BPM. Plus I've fixed almost all of your suggestions on Beginner :P

01:04:808 (1,2) - Can't say I like this flow, it should be more like this IMO.
Here we can have the 01:04:808 (1) blanketing the 01:07:208 (1) and we can avoid them overlapping which is nice.


01:14:408 (1,2,3,1) - I think we should try and avoid all of this overlap. The beginner would enjoy a beatmap more if it has them moving more around the screen IMO. I also think we should make 01:18:008 (2,3) flow towards the center of the screen to setup for the spinner. I believe this will help a beginning player notice it faster. Can you rearrange 01:14:408 (1,2) so we can accomplish that?


01:18:908 (3) - Maybe make this two circles instead of a slider? That way we could hit a circle on the downbeat 01:19:208 to kickstart that stream which would feel nice.


01:50:708 (2) - No reason for the repeat here. You should just repeat the same pattern that you did at 01:46:808 (1,2). Like this?
Doesn't that flow nice? You could have the 01:48:308 (2) aiming at the 01:49:208 (1).

02:00:908 (3) - Just delete this note. It stacks with 02:01:208 (1) and it breaks the pattern before it even though were in the same verse here. :cry:
Do not stack like this in beginner please. Especially at this BPM.


02:03:008 (4,5) - Lets rethink this. Wouldn't it feel more powerful to hit a circle on the downbeat at 02:03:608 instead of a slider end? Plus we could have a new combo there... It would be so much better. Please switch the positions of the 4 and 5 so we can have this nice pattern here:
02:01:208 (1) to 02:06:008 (1)
NC at 02:03:608 and 02:06:008
Isn't that a much more epic way to end the song than a slider end with no NC?

[Standard]

It's a great map, so just suggestions.

Are you sure about all of this overlap? Don't you think it might be a bit confusing for players at this level?
00:23:708 (1) - Remove this circle? It's just messing up the combos here and it's fine without it. Done

00:24:908 (2,1,2,3,4,1) - Ugh...Don't you think this is all just really messy? Wouldn't it have been better like this?:
The 00:24:908 (2) isn't intruding on the 00:25:208 (1,2,3,4) combo, but is instead leading into it. The 00:26:408 (1) is stacked on the 00:25:208 (1) which looks nice and is intuitive to read. You can stack the 00:27:308 (2) onto the 4 to flow out of the combo and into the next. aw ;w;I knew that was messy, sorry. Fixed.

00:27:608 (1,2,3,4,1) - Same thing here. Isn't it better like this?: Done
Stack the 00:28:808 (1) on the 00:27:608 (1)

00:54:008 (1) - Why not stack on the 00:52:808 (1) and have it flow through the 00:53:108 (2) into the 00:54:608 (2)? I love that pattern as hell, even on a normal difficulty. (jk) Nice suggestion though!

I feel like we should have circles at 01:38:108 and 01:40:508 so here's what I suggest. Done

02:03:608 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - Why not more like this? Yes for this one, don't cry dear.
Doesn't it look cleaner? :cry:


[Another]

The spacing can be a bit ridiculous at times IMO. ヾ(*'ロ'*)ノ"

00:25:508 (5,6,7) - Why does spacing increase so much here? There is no change in the music. Remapped from 00:25:208 - to 00:30:008 -

00:40:208 (5,6,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - It would be better if they were forming some sort of a pattern, or were stacking on previous notes. It feels like a lot of them are placed randomly and is really difficult to play. Fixed, hope it works.

00:52:658 (3,4) - :cry: With the previous 1 and 2, I'm expecting this 3 to fall on the downbeat, but instead it falls on the red tick before it. It's super confusing and feels terrible to play. Just remove the 3. Done

01:48:008 (1,2,3,4) - See wouldn't it feel nicer if these flowed out of the previous 01:47:708 (4) a little better? Done

You should think more about patterns and stacking on previous notes in this diff IMO. You're right, I didn't do it well on this map :<

[Extra]

:cry:
Don't think I can help you much here. Sorry. It's fine.


Anyways. I hope this is helpful. :)
Thanks for requesting a mod. I'll leave star. <3
Exactly which mod I needed for this map, thank you so much.


ルーラーさん

NewRulerNA wrote:

hi
今回は日本語でModしています
もしわからなければフォーラムPMを送ってきてください 了解です

I modded in Japanese. if you are not able to understand it, send me forum PM.

[General]
  1. "soft-slidertick2-old1.wav"が使われている形跡がありませんが、これは必要でしょうか?
    私にはこれが不要なファイルのように思えました
     ・・ミスしましたΣ(゚д゚;)言った通りに使っていませんでした
[Beginner]
  1. 00:02:408 - なぜここからnoteを置いていないのでしょうか?
    ここからnoteを置くことが可能で、わざと異なる開始位置を持たせる必要性を感じませんでした 上手く言えないけど、最初のバードは難しく作らないので。初心者が「簡単な譜面」に誤解されたら大変になりそうで。
  2. 00:20:408 (1) - このnoteの中央にスピナーによるヒットバーストが発生し、短時間とはいえ最低難易度で被るのが私には悪く思えました パターンの移動しました、提案のパターンもいいが・・http://puu.sh/1x2U3 spinner-osuに完璧カバーされたので諦めた
    画像のような流れを持たせて被らないようにさせてみてはどうでしょうか?
  3. 00:24:008 (1,2) - この部分の流れを今よりよくできそうな提案 今のままでも大丈夫そうですので(00:20:408 - ここからのパターンが変わってないから)
    (3,1)を調節して(2)を今よりフォローした配置にすることでより良い流れを作ることができます
  4. 00:35:408 (3,4) - remove whistle? Done
    00:30:608 (3) との音取りの一貫性がないのが私には気になりました
  5. 01:39:608 (3,1) - ヒットバーストの被りに関して 調整をしました
    ひとつの提案としてこんな流れはどうでしょう
    ただ01:40:808 (1,2)の部分の距離が極端に開いてしまい、スライダーの形に関して調節が必要となってしまいます 調整をしました
  6. 01:49:208 (1,1) - 細かな部分に関しての調節案 一つのreverse取外しました
    被っていないほうが見た目的にも良くなります
[Standard]
  1. 00:24:908 (3,1,2,3,4) - この箇所がARの関係でかなり見難くなっています Unitedさんのmoddingについて、このパードをやり直した
    (1,2)の部分を1/1スライダーに変更等をして少しnoteを減らし、見やすさを確保させるべきです
    ARを上げればそれである程度は解決するのですが、Beginnerとの難易度のバランス的にその変更を提案することが難しいのでこの改善案を出しました
  2. 00:39:608 (2,2,1,2) - ヒットサウンドに関しての提案
    00:39:608 (2) - finishを開始に追加 いい提案だったけど、譜面のfinishは音楽によってつけましたので(´・ω・`)・・
    00:41:408 (2) - ^
    00:42:008 (1,2) - finishを終わりにも追加 追加しました
    曲に対してヒットサウンドの存在が地味だったので、finishを強調する方が曲に合うように思えました
  3. 01:20:408 (2) - スライダーエンドがnormal-hitnormalなのはわざと?
    私にはここはsoft-hitfinishのほうが曲とこの前後の音付けのほうが合うように思えました 同じく、soft-hitfinishに変更しました
  4. 01:37:508 (2) - 見た目に関しての改善案 Unitedさんのmoddingについて、ここは既に修正されました
    丸の中心に向かって伸びるスライダーのほうが見た目を良く、バランスを保つことができます
  5. 01:39:908 (2) - ^
[Another]
  1. 01:19:208 (3) - これをnazi modだと言うかも知れません・・・・が、私には緑線の影響で01:18:608 (1,2,3)の実際の距離が異なっていることが気になりました そうだったの!ありがとう
  2. 01:40:208 - add note?
    今の状態でも問題はないのですが、私にはここにnoteを置くことが可能であるように思えました
    これは好みの問題なので変更はしなくて構いません ちょっと突然な3/4だったけど、1/2のとこには音がないので仕方ありません(´;ω;`)
[Extra]
  1. 00:53:708 (5) - 直前のスタックのズレによりリバースアローがほぼ隠れて、キックスライダー最初のリバースを確認することが困難であるように思えます
    これはRankableの可能性は十分にありますが、これが私には不安な要素のように思えました
     軽くに修正しました
  2. 01:17:706 (7) - snapしていません よくわからないけど修正しました

gl

いい指摘でした!ありがとうございます
No_Gu

Pokie wrote:

Last full-submit: 4rd Dec
我觉得有必要把这卖萌上传日期留个记录
Topic Starter
Pokie

No_Gu wrote:

Pokie wrote:

Last full-submit: 4rd Dec
我觉得有必要把这卖萌上传日期留个记录
f...fu......f**k yo* moive!!!!
Curisu
source唔應該填2dx...? 系原曲在2dx18出現..感覺似填tag
Topic Starter
Pokie

Curisu wrote:

source唔應該填2dx...? 系原曲在2dx18出現..感覺似填tag
http://osu.ppy.sh/s/24304 umm我都係跟返呢張填法=w= 其實我都唔係好肯定, 但無soure好似怪怪地咁…就填左IIDX 18
tutuhaha
[Beginner]
00:23:408 (3) - 考虑到这个是最低难度,为了减少违和感还是从这个slider开始变成1.0x比较好,顺便考虑加NC吧
00:43:245 (x) - kiai的结尾绿线没在线上啊,还是故意的?
00:54:608 (3,1) - 微妙的间距问题,虽然知道是格子问题还是调一下吧
00:59:408 (2,1) - ^

[Hyper]
00:10:808 (3,4,1) - 把4和1的间距倒腾成3和4的间距
00:25:808 (3,4) - 这边节奏不适合这个排法感觉,控大点间距比较开心
00:30:908 (4) - ctrl+G?
00:40:208 (5,6,7,8) - 加NC后控大或者变成俩slider后控大
00:49:208 (1,2) - 这俩都ctrl+G
01:03:608 (1,2) - 这俩拉大点试试
01:15:008 (3,4) - 试试这样
01:39:608 (1) - 前面的同样节奏都很普通为什么要在这里恶心下Orz......
这开头太有谷子风格了不用看tag都知道Orz....................

[Another]
00:04:658 (X) - 加个note把
00:05:858 (X) - ^
00:09:458 (X) - ^
01:19:283 (1,1) - 这俩spinner之间空这么点点感觉一点意义都没有...........
02:00:608 (5,6,7,8) - 这一组感觉应该和前面那4拍微妙的不同.......有表达到么Orz

[Extra]
00:04:058 (2) - 2移到这里吧
00:16:958 (1) - 我习惯是吧spinner移到这里
01:55:808 (5,6) - 这两拍应该更强调点?
Curisu

Pokie wrote:

Curisu wrote:

source唔應該填2dx...? 系原曲在2dx18出現..感覺似填tag
http://osu.ppy.sh/s/24304 umm我都係跟返呢張填法=w= 其實我都唔係好肯定, 但無soure好似怪怪地咁…就填左IIDX 18
呢張咁填冇咩問題啊..
不過甘多東方Remix都填Touhou其實咁樣同樣冇問題

it's up 2 u lol
Topic Starter
Pokie
2ha

tutuhaha wrote:

[Beginner]
00:23:408 (3) - 考虑到这个是最低难度,为了减少违和感还是从这个slider开始变成1.0x比较好,顺便考虑加NC吧 Done
00:43:245 (x) - kiai的结尾绿线没在线上啊,还是故意的? 那邊是弄了一個噴泉, 線在1/8上
00:54:608 (3,1) - 微妙的间距问题,虽然知道是格子问题还是调一下吧 Done
00:59:408 (2,1) - ^ Done

[Hyper]
这开头太有谷子风格了不用看tag都知道Orz.................... Hahahaha(

[Another]
00:04:658 (X) - 加个note把 這裡三個就免了, 故意漏拍的
00:05:858 (X) - ^
00:09:458 (X) - ^
01:19:283 (1,1) - 这俩spinner之间空这么点点感觉一点意义都没有........... 雖然我不理解為何不能只空1/8拍, 不過改了
02:00:608 (5,6,7,8) - 这一组感觉应该和前面那4拍微妙的不同.......有表达到么Orz 實話直說就是我偷懶了(整張圖都很), 正好當作下一段的引導…?

[Extra]
00:04:058 (2) - 2移到这里吧 刪note仔細聽的話, 背景中紅線比藍線的音要明顯啊…
00:16:958 (1) - 我习惯是吧spinner移到这里 我也這麼覺得, 只是test play時覺得spinner來的太快就改了…既然你提到那我改回來
01:55:808 (5,6) - 这两拍应该更强调点? …呼呼你這麼說的話那我就加個坑試試 =w=

謝謝2ha XD


@萌妹: \up 2 u/ 那麼我就先留著看看如何!
Cristian
[Beginner]
00:23:408 (1,2) - Well if you're trying to make it fit with that slider... http://puu.sh/1zpRj is ugly as hell, move the end-point of the slider more up, should be like this http://puu.sh/1zpSO
00:28:208 (4,2) - Overlap with 2
01:55:508 (2,3,1) - Look's no easy, even beginner
01:57:908 (2) - Overlap with 01:56:108 (3)

[hyper]
00:45:608 ~ 00:46:658 - You should map this part
01:39:608 (1) - I would say... no, remap this slider

[Another]
00:42:908 (3) - Incorrect position at there... try to make it like this http://puu.sh/1zqcY

[Extra]
00:09:458 - Add a note here, if you're doing the rhythm like that
01:43:733 (3) - I got confused there, no rhythm please fix
01:44:333 (2,3) - ^

Tags: delete Random on the tag RandomBemani, just Bemani is fine
"PARADISE LOST" is in the title, add it in the tag is just crap, delete it

Standard diff is fine.
Topic Starter
Pokie
SPOILER

Cristian wrote:

[Beginner]
00:23:408 (1,2) - Well if you're trying to make it fit with that slider... http://puu.sh/1zpRj is ugly as hell, move the end-point of the slider more up, should be like this http://puu.sh/1zpSO Trying to fit X, Following DS O :D
00:28:208 (4,2) - Overlap with 2 I can't get the reason.
01:55:508 (2,3,1) - Look's no easy, even beginner Deleted (3)
01:57:908 (2) - Overlap with 01:56:108 (3) Since it was deleted^

[Another]
00:42:908 (3) - Incorrect position at there... try to make it like this http://puu.sh/1zqcY eh...incorrect? Anyway fixed.

[Extra]
00:09:458 - Add a note here, if you're doing the rhythm like that Done
01:43:733 (3) - I got confused there, no rhythm please fix 01:43:433 (2) - This should the main point, not that triples imo. :?
01:44:333 (2,3) - ^

Tags: delete Random on the tag RandomBemani, just Bemani is fine RandomBemani was the creator of this song.
"PARADISE LOST" is in the title, add it in the tag is just crap, delete it hoho, you missed. The title was PARADISE GHOST.

Standard diff is fine.

Thank you :D
Colin Hou
bubbled

edit: popped by mapper, fixed
Muya
I think artist should be arranger's name :?
Topic Starter
Pokie

Muya wrote:

I think artist should be arranger's name :?
This title was named by his/her own, I respect his/her choice :<


@Colin: Checked some bugged time sections
Ulysses
Hohohoho
Topic Starter
Pokie

nold_1702 wrote:

Hohohoho
Huhuhuhu
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply