That's unnecessary because I have already put it in source.UnderminE wrote:
I l~ove this song.
But, you should add "Sacred Seven" to tags.
forum
FictionJunction - stone cold (TV Size) [Osu|Taiko]
posted
Total Posts
60
Topic Starter
ThanksSuzully wrote:
[SamiPale]
This is also nice mapset!
Haha I can't mod well cuz both are perfect
- 00:28:402 (1) - Start it at 00:28:195?
kpy help me fixed this orz
FictionJunction <3
我來射星的
☆～
字數字數字數字數字數
我來射星的
☆～
字數字數字數字數字數
After some recheck,it's good enough for me.
Keep it up,bubbled.
Keep it up,bubbled.
nice
Just mattered about Taiko Oni's Kiai end point but whatever :3
Keep going >_>
Keep going >_>
sorry gonna have to Design mod
Normal
00:36:673 (4,5,6) - this pattern felt wrong, i think its because of the repeating slider, it repeats even when the vocals are on a break, even though all the other times you have used a specific pattern of timing to help follow the vocals, that made this play really bad a feel odd
same comment for next time the vocals do the same pattern too, it just really dont suit the song having constant 1/2s.
00:56:121 - might flow better to have a note here, when playing i auto wanted to play one because i could feel the song building up.
Hard
00:05:225 (1,2) - having these as 1/4 sliders played really bad, it would play much better if you made it flow with your other patterns by giving it 1/2 silders
00:10:811 (2,3,4) - this triple pattern felt forced, i cant find a reason why you used it?
tbh i cant find a reason for quite a lot of the 1/4 triples?
00:56:121 (5) - this small spacing in the middle if a jump pattern really got me, infact i didnt even notice the note when playing, maybe give this more space so it follows your jump pattern
Karen
00:09:259 (3,4,5,6) - the spacing of the (3,4) compared to (4,5,6) i see no reason to see the different spacing?
(suggestion) 00:26:535 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - the stacked notes in this became rather hard to read due to the timing imo, maybe take a look at this part again
00:35:742 (3,4,5,6) - same comment again over the spacing
00:42:363 (3,4,5,6) - again.....yea you get what i mean over these, the spacing makes it look like its 1/2 onto a 1/4 pattern, but its all 1/4
them are the things what REALLY stood out to me
Normal
00:36:673 (4,5,6) - this pattern felt wrong, i think its because of the repeating slider, it repeats even when the vocals are on a break, even though all the other times you have used a specific pattern of timing to help follow the vocals, that made this play really bad a feel odd
same comment for next time the vocals do the same pattern too, it just really dont suit the song having constant 1/2s.
00:56:121 - might flow better to have a note here, when playing i auto wanted to play one because i could feel the song building up.
Hard
00:05:225 (1,2) - having these as 1/4 sliders played really bad, it would play much better if you made it flow with your other patterns by giving it 1/2 silders
00:10:811 (2,3,4) - this triple pattern felt forced, i cant find a reason why you used it?
tbh i cant find a reason for quite a lot of the 1/4 triples?
00:56:121 (5) - this small spacing in the middle if a jump pattern really got me, infact i didnt even notice the note when playing, maybe give this more space so it follows your jump pattern
Karen
00:09:259 (3,4,5,6) - the spacing of the (3,4) compared to (4,5,6) i see no reason to see the different spacing?
(suggestion) 00:26:535 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - the stacked notes in this became rather hard to read due to the timing imo, maybe take a look at this part again
00:35:742 (3,4,5,6) - same comment again over the spacing
00:42:363 (3,4,5,6) - again.....yea you get what i mean over these, the spacing makes it look like its 1/2 onto a 1/4 pattern, but its all 1/4
them are the things what REALLY stood out to me
Topic Starter
Whee~Thanksjericho2442 wrote:
sorry gonna have to Design mod
Normal
00:36:673 (4,5,6) - this pattern felt wrong, i think its because of the repeating slider, it repeats even when the vocals are on a break, even though all the other times you have used a specific pattern of timing to help follow the vocals, that made this play really bad a feel odd
same comment for next time the vocals do the same pattern too, it just really dont suit the song having constant 1/2s.Fixed in another way :O
00:56:121 - might flow better to have a note here, when playing i auto wanted to play one because i could feel the song building up.
k
Hard
00:05:225 (1,2) - having these as 1/4 sliders played really bad, it would play much better if you made it flow with your other patterns by giving it 1/2 silders k.
00:10:811 (2,3,4) - this triple pattern felt forced, i cant find a reason why you used it? Back to 1/2
tbh i cant find a reason for quite a lot of the 1/4 triples?
00:56:121 (5) - this small spacing in the middle if a jump pattern really got me, infact i didnt even notice the note when playing, maybe give this more space so it follows your jump pattern hum,ok
no,some player tell me it is not hard to read,also I can read thisjericho2442 wrote:
Karen
(suggestion) 00:26:535 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - the stacked notes in this became rather hard to read due to the timing imo, maybe take a look at this e
other fixed
Topic Starter
>Karenying
Upload!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Upload!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[Hard]
01:14:535 (5,2) - The two is a little unreadable due to the 5's hitburst, you don't have to fix it as it can kinda be seen, but it threw me for a loop when I sightread it.
[Taiko Oni]
I just have to say I really liked how this was hitsounded, sounded really good imo.
[Karen]
01:08:121 (1,3,5) - When I saw this, I literately said, "nice blanket"
Overall, I found the maps to be enjoyable and well mapped, the only issue I had was that one that was in hard. You get a star good sir. And if you call me back after deciding what to do with that thing in hard, there may be a bubble for you.
Edit: I'm just gonna leave this here.
01:14:535 (5,2) - The two is a little unreadable due to the 5's hitburst, you don't have to fix it as it can kinda be seen, but it threw me for a loop when I sightread it.
[Taiko Oni]
I just have to say I really liked how this was hitsounded, sounded really good imo.
[Karen]
01:08:121 (1,3,5) - When I saw this, I literately said, "nice blanket"
Overall, I found the maps to be enjoyable and well mapped, the only issue I had was that one that was in hard. You get a star good sir. And if you call me back after deciding what to do with that thing in hard, there may be a bubble for you.
Edit: I'm just gonna leave this here.
Topic Starter
Thanks for modding!rust45 wrote:
[Hard]
01:14:535 (5,2) - The two is a little unreadable due to the 5's hitburst, you don't have to fix it as it can kinda be seen, but it threw me for a loop when I sightread it. k,fixed!
Good enough to go to me.
Ranked~
Ranked~
Congratulations
Topic Starter
Thanks Andrea and Hinacle <3
Oh I'm late. 
Congrats for your perfect collab map<3
Congrats for your perfect collab map<3