Your message is too short. Please do not post messages like "star"
star~
star~
ThanksSuzully wrote:
[Karen]
Nice mapset!
What I can suggest is only one thing.
- 00:04:609 (4) - Add a new combo?
Thanks for modding!Suzully wrote:
[General][Normal]
Combo color looks too similar with each other for me.
Chenge them more dark one? Will consider it if someone mention this again but not now.
I think that newbie will be confused by the pattern like as 00:02:954 (2,3)...
However it's maybe not big issue because there is other easiest diff. I assume normal is for some player between Newbie and middle,so yeah~[Hard]
- 00:36:885 (5) - It's hard to read for newbie imo. Reduce repeat like this? ^ You know it xD
- 01:21:161 (2,3) - I feel something strange rhythm. How about...change (2) to circle, and move (3) to 01:21:368, and then add a note at 01:21:988 stacking with 01:22:195 (5)? X.
That's unnecessary because I have already put it in source.UnderminE wrote:
I l~ove this song.
But, you should add "Sacred Seven" to tags.
ThanksSuzully wrote:
[SamiPale]
This is also nice mapset!
Haha I can't mod well cuz both are perfect
- 00:28:402 (1) - Start it at 00:28:195?
Whee~Thanksjericho2442 wrote:
sorry gonna have to Design mod
Normal
00:36:673 (4,5,6) - this pattern felt wrong, i think its because of the repeating slider, it repeats even when the vocals are on a break, even though all the other times you have used a specific pattern of timing to help follow the vocals, that made this play really bad a feel odd
same comment for next time the vocals do the same pattern too, it just really dont suit the song having constant 1/2s.Fixed in another way :O
00:56:121 - might flow better to have a note here, when playing i auto wanted to play one because i could feel the song building up.
k
Hard
00:05:225 (1,2) - having these as 1/4 sliders played really bad, it would play much better if you made it flow with your other patterns by giving it 1/2 silders k.
00:10:811 (2,3,4) - this triple pattern felt forced, i cant find a reason why you used it? Back to 1/2
tbh i cant find a reason for quite a lot of the 1/4 triples?
00:56:121 (5) - this small spacing in the middle if a jump pattern really got me, infact i didnt even notice the note when playing, maybe give this more space so it follows your jump pattern hum,ok
no,some player tell me it is not hard to read,also I can read thisjericho2442 wrote:
Karen
(suggestion) 00:26:535 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - the stacked notes in this became rather hard to read due to the timing imo, maybe take a look at this e
Thanks for modding!rust45 wrote:
[Hard]
01:14:535 (5,2) - The two is a little unreadable due to the 5's hitburst, you don't have to fix it as it can kinda be seen, but it threw me for a loop when I sightread it. k,fixed!