Actually, I want to hear from Kiddo-kun because he's the only one I haven't formulated an opinion on.
really? That irritates me to the point in which I want to vote for you so bad. The sad part is you're probably not mafia because no mafia member would be willing to admit that they're staying under the radar and not posting on purpose.Lilac wrote:
but I really didn't want to post until Day 2.
Er, actually, no. Others have referenced the fact that I'm a newbie which is completely true.Quaraezha wrote:
Have you played any other Mafia Games before?
I agree about wanting to hear from him, but so far your past opinions have basically been "everyone's acting normal and must be town". It doesn't seem quite scummy, but also not quite helpful.Lilac wrote:
Actually, I want to hear from Kiddo-kun because he's the only one I haven't formulated an opinion on.
Yes it does. That's exactly scummy. Why isn't Lilac suspicious of anyone?akrolsmir wrote:
It doesn't seem quite scummy, but also not quite helpful.
that's what I was trying to find the words for earlier, but I couldn't write it properly so I went to bedWojjan wrote:
Yes it does. That's exactly scummy. Why isn't Lilac suspicious of anyone?
Playstyles vary. I've seen mafia who will latch on to a player and attack them viciously on D1.Two wrote:
I noticed that when I was mafia in a recent game, I would spend the majority of my time explaining why someone probably isn't mafia and I rarely attacked anyone. I don't think most mafia will seriously (not "random vote", not "maybe, looks, might be") attack anyone unless it's already been initiated by someone else on day 1.
He does seem to be bandwagoning a bit, just spitting out what others have said without coming up with anything original.( But then I'm probably going to be slightly biased regarding that)Two wrote:
unvote, vote Kiddo-Kun
Why does this feel like you're only attacking him because he voted you...akrolsmir wrote:
He does seem to be bandwagoning a bit, just spitting out what others have said without coming up with anything original.( But then I'm probably going to be slightly biased regarding that)
Because my play was pretty bad and each post led someone else to suspect me, so I decided to shut up and listen to what others had to say about it.Two wrote:
akrolsmir: why are you lurking?
conveniently leaving LadySuburu out, I'm on to youfoulcoon wrote:
@Two according to mod it would actually take 2 more (7 votes) to lynch akrolsmir.
Would like to hear from:
animask
Rantai
Quaraezha
Lilac
akrolsmir
Who do you find suspicious? Kiddo-Kun? akrolsmir? someone else?
watLybydose wrote:
conveniently leaving LadySuburu out, I'm on to youfoulcoon wrote:
@Two according to mod it would actually take 2 more (7 votes) to lynch akrolsmir.
Would like to hear from:
animask
Rantai
Quaraezha
Lilac
akrolsmir
Who do you find suspicious? Kiddo-Kun? akrolsmir? someone else?
I assume he was saying that you left out LadySuburu with your "who do you find suspicious?" question, but you can never be too sure with the challenged.foulcoon wrote:
wat
I used Two's list of people not voting... LadySuburu isn't on it. Is LS voting kiddo? There at least was an FoS or HoS so I already have my answer?
1. mafia can't talk during the dayanimask wrote:
Firstly, I've been keeping track of the votes and unvotes. (No, I just looked at Two's post) I have a general
suspicion on everyone who has been messing with the votes. (Mostly Lybydose) If Two and Lybydose were mafia
they could be easily be using a strategy of some kind with voting. I've noticed that Two hasn't said anything to Lybydose
about his votes.
Shouldn't he have been thinking that in the first place? If you were a townie you can't be helpful if you don't say anything.Lilac wrote:
You make it sound like that's a bad thing. I know it's in most people's minds that it is but I really did it in order to get a good grasp of Day 1. However, now that I think about it, contributing in Day 1 actually makes it better for you to understand the situation.Rantai wrote:
Why would that be? Sounds like you're trying to avoid attention.
You wanted people to use votes instead of FoS/HoS. He used votes instead of FoS/HoS.Two wrote:
1. mafia can't talk during the day
2. masons can
3. I've actually commented on his last two votes, maybe even all of his votes who knows
4. I'm not a mason
He hasn't said anything at all. Has he?Two wrote:
I really don't understand your question
akrolsmir and Lilac.foulcoon wrote:
Would like to hear from:
---
Who do you find suspicious? Kiddo-Kun? akrolsmir? someone else?
I'll probably contribute more but I really didn't want to post until Day 2.
prettyyyyy sure your post history was barren, but if you'd like to correct me and point out where there was real substance, go aheadLybydose wrote:
Since we're living in the magical world where any time Two is wrong, it didn't really happen, I guess that means I've done nothing.
If you're actually town you're not making it much better for yourself by being a defeatist. Town should be trying to stay alive and lynch scum, not actively helping the mafia lynch them.Lilac wrote:
I'm not going to defend myself because there is no point. My lynching today will obviously mean that someone in the Mafia has voted for me already for being suspicious and if they haven't, they're probably the dumbest person ever because it's FREE KILL. I'm pretty sure that there's 3 in this game and that at least one of them has already jumped on me though, if not more.
What?Lilac wrote:
Considering that there are 3 Mafia in this game, I am going to cross of foulcoon, Lybydose, Kiddo-Kun, akrolsmir and Rantai out.
What?Lilac wrote:
akrolsmir even try to back up the claim...Unless he didn't do it right.
Probably too far gone for that. Also, I hate when people use that saying.adam2046 wrote:
If you're actually town you're not making it much better for yourself by being a defeatist. Town should be trying to stay alive and lynch scum, not actively helping the mafia lynch them.
Two even followed your reason. WHY TWO?!? WHHHHY MUST YOU STOOP TO ANIMASK'S LEVEL!?!?!? Hate isn't a reason to kill! Only to seriously maim!animask wrote:
Vote: Lilac
I'm not really suspicous of you, but I do hate your guts tremendously.
Answered you.akrolsmir wrote:
Vote: Lilac, for trying to shift attention away from you without really providing defense for yourself. Or a case of any kind, really-
Typical.Quaraezha wrote:
I don't vote quite often but I'll bandwagon for now
Vote: Lilac
What?Lybydose wrote:
vote: Lilac
His recent statements are even more scummy.
Okay I get it now. I ask you a question, you answer the question, I am satisfied that that is how you feel about the subject even though I disagree. Lilac somehow expects me to start a long useless argument on the subject.akrolsmir wrote:
@adam Go back and read your last post (you know, 5 pages ago?), though I agree that Lilac's statement is pretty ambiguously worded.
Stop doing that.Lilac wrote:
Probably too far gone for that.
The saying about how to actually play mafia? Namely that the point is actually lynching mafia?Lilac wrote:
Also, I hate when people use that saying.
What? I did?adam wrote:
Lilac somehow expects me to start a long useless argument on the subject.
Lilac wrote:
I'm not lying when I said I wasn't mafia. In fact, this is the best role I've had in ages.
Lilac wrote:
I'm not going to defend myself because there is no point.
have you been drinking animask juice or somethingLilac wrote:
However, now that I think about it, contributing in Day 1 actually makes it better for you to understand the situation.
I was considering ladysuburu tooLilac wrote:
I don't really have a strong sense on who to kill yet. I'm leaning towards LS but we've still got 4 more days to discuss this and I would really like to see how this day progresses.
Because I just got home from my practicals and still reading (forgive me if I'm slow).Two wrote:
and I'm now wondering why rantai just lurked and left after all of these posts
As for myself, Rantai- well, I AM a newbie, how else would you expect me to play?By not using the fact you're a newbie to defend yourself. Take it how you like, I thinks it's a weak way out.
/wristsLilac wrote:
5. Wojjan - I never liked you...Actually, I did when you started that TTYD project. I think I might do a song but the point stands. I don't like you. You hardly do anything, you troll and yet people respect you for that. I assume it's your past history which does that considering your upper most role as the cult.
Why? D:Two wrote:
adam2046
>pick half of the namesTwo wrote:
I forgot to unvote
but I'm only gonna vote again if a bandwagon is started on one of these people:
LadySuburu
adam2046
Wojjan
foulcoon
Quaraezha
Because everything that's worth saying has been said, his posts have scum written all over and in a last desperate plea he gives us an "analysis" of all the players, especially mine being off-topic and riddled with misplaced pathosakrolsmir wrote:
Vote: Wojjan your vote feels like omgus without any content, why bring him to L-1 in spite of Lilac's recent posts without providing any justification whatsoever?
Lilac wrote:
akrolsmir: Playing by the book, maybe it's the newbie charm that leads me to think that people who are new to the game are not necessarily mafia at first...This is more of looking at the setup and trying to read into the host but hell that ain't going to work. Anyone that kinda leans towards town is town for me at this point in time.
akrolsmir: Never played with him before. Uses mafiascum newbie guide, and doesn't come off as suspicious to me. Neutral read.Apparently akrols went from town to neutral in one page.
Two, why aren't you considering Kiddo in your list of people you're going to vote on? Do you think this argument isn't true, or that it doesn't hold enough merit for Kiddo to be scum on its own?LadySuburu wrote:
Kiddo: Shows up only after I vote him to get him in here, makes a scummy post, and follows it with another scummy post (excuse to vote? Slip there?). Follows it with a post trying to explain away the last post's scummy feel. (Which the post makes it seem like he was voting entirely based off of foul's reasonings alone.) Scum read.
I don't like this post at all. Top dollar if you can figure out the riddle.Kiddo-Kun wrote:
I'm just saying. A lot of his post are just him jumping at people will silly accusations.
Also, I guess my other post is very unclear and I guess it gave off a very scummy vibe. What I meant was "foulcoon had a nice point, and I agree with that."
1. Bullshit reasoning, WIFOM around the clock. Good mafia players don't want to fall out of tone and bandwagon right along like pretty little sheep.Quaraezha wrote:
Alright, finally had the time to read all the posts (Rushed it though)
Currently at my School's Library and internet is kinda slow, so I won't quote anyposts for now.
I'll just post whatever I can and remember for now.
1.
Nobody seems to be protecting akrolsmir at the moment since most are attacking him.
So if akrolsmir is really Mafia, another Mafia wouldn't normally attack him as well, especially in Day 1.
If that's the case, the other Mafia members are luerkers, since they haven't protected/attacked anyone yet.
2.
I find it really awkward being (somehow) protected by Two,
but I guess that was just to convince akrolsmir of my playstyle.
Two has always been the type to make brutal (?) posts, and that's just Two being Two,
I can't really tell if he's Town or Mafia atm.
Although, he seems to be more aggressive and protective in this game to the previous ones I've played with him,
not sure why. But that's just my opinions.
3.
So about me being active in the other forums except this one.
The other threads aren't serious as Mafia Games, and I wasn't really in the mood to play Mafia or think too hard.
And animask, about me not joining anymore Mafia Games, that's silly.
I'm here for the same reason you are, just to add more characters.
It's fun to have a Mafia Game with different kinds of people.
Well, that's all I can say for now, I have classes in a few minutes.
I'll just add my other thoughts later when I get home or whatever.
cause the people I listed seem more likely than he does to me, on top of the fact that even if they aren't mafia they allow a lot more dots to be connectedWojjan wrote:
Two, why aren't you considering Kiddo in your list of people you're going to vote on? Do you think this argument isn't true, or that it doesn't hold enough merit for Kiddo to be scum on its own?
I didn't say that second quote...LS did...Wojjan wrote:
akrolsmir: Never played with him before. Uses mafiascum newbie guide, and doesn't come off as suspicious to me. Neutral read.Apparently akrols went from town to neutral in one page.
Didn't even vote anyone. I want answers, not a lynch.foulcoon wrote:
Unvote
Vote: Wojjan
everyone is mafia now?
Voting on the other bandwagon so he won't get lynched insteadLilac wrote:
However, I don't want to get lynched over stupid reasons like that. Answering foulcoon, the person I'm currently most suspicious of is Kiddo. However, my vote now would only just make me more suspicious anyway.
Vote: Kiddo-kun
Come at me, bro.
Voting on the other bandwagon so he won't get lynched insteadLilac wrote:
Vote: Wojjan You played like this in the first mafia game I was in. The only one where I survived until Lylo.
I guess you could accuse me of bandwagoning on Lilac, but I did point him out earlier before anyone started voting.Ok. I missed that line, but it still doesn't clear you due to the rest in my eyes.
I wasn't aware you could do that.Two wrote:
oh and prod everyone please
foulcoon wrote:
I'm here, just don't have anything worth posting right now.