i wonder if anyone noticed
forum
Tanya Degurechaff (CV: Yuki Aoi) - Los! Los! Los!
posted
Total Posts
255
Just a quick question for Easy.
00:32:212 (5,1) - and 01:01:212 (1,2) - These only 1.0 spacing while you used 1.2 for the others. Was there reason behind these only using 1.0 or did you just miss them? While I can understand 00:32:212 (5,1) -, 01:01:212 (1,2) - contradicts with 01:09:212 (1,2) - since they are essentially the same.
Also one more thing.
01:11:212 (1,2,1) - in Easy I feel could be placed a little cleaner. Easiest and most effective way without changing much is to curve 01:10:212 (2) - downwards and place 01:11:212 (1) - in the top left corner. That leaves a lot more room for 01:12:712 (2) - so it doesn't look awkwardly placed.
If you wish to fix these, let me know.
00:32:212 (5,1) - and 01:01:212 (1,2) - These only 1.0 spacing while you used 1.2 for the others. Was there reason behind these only using 1.0 or did you just miss them? While I can understand 00:32:212 (5,1) -, 01:01:212 (1,2) - contradicts with 01:09:212 (1,2) - since they are essentially the same.
Also one more thing.
01:11:212 (1,2,1) - in Easy I feel could be placed a little cleaner. Easiest and most effective way without changing much is to curve 01:10:212 (2) - downwards and place 01:11:212 (1) - in the top left corner. That leaves a lot more room for 01:12:712 (2) - so it doesn't look awkwardly placed.
If you wish to fix these, let me know.
Topic Starter
fixed both of those, the first one was just an oversight that i missed (though i also didnt mind it as a leadin to the section, but its just as fine being consistent with the rest)Lanturn wrote:
Just a quick question for Easy.
00:32:212 (5,1) - and 01:01:212 (1,2) - These only 1.0 spacing while you used 1.2 for the others. Was there reason behind these only using 1.0 or did you just miss them? While I can understand 00:32:212 (5,1) -, 01:01:212 (1,2) - contradicts with 01:09:212 (1,2) - since they are essentially the same.
Also one more thing.
01:11:212 (1,2,1) - in Easy I feel could be placed a little cleaner. Easiest and most effective way without changing much is to curve 01:10:212 (2) - downwards and place 01:11:212 (1) - in the top left corner. That leaves a lot more room for 01:12:712 (2) - so it doesn't look awkwardly placed.
If you wish to fix these, let me know.
DQ on mapper request to fix Easy stuff.
Back
Yay!
disqualified due to kalibe's diff breaking fruits sr
its because of the .osu file which is fucked, just move a note to somewhere and back and boom, its fixed
actual ctb sr is 3.49*, not 9.28*/10*+
actual ctb sr is 3.49*, not 9.28*/10*+
乚口厶工匚 卂厶乇𠘨丅 尺乇长丅
Topic Starter
ya i'll fix it in a lil bit
Rebubbled.
Make sure to wait 24 hours and double check the diff has actually been fixed before qualification. Good luck!
Make sure to wait 24 hours and double check the diff has actually been fixed before qualification. Good luck!
rip my pp :\
Mir wrote:
disqualified due to kalibe's diff breaking fruits sr
give me my goddamn pp
May I ask which members of the QAT were involved in the discussion for this DQ? This opens up questions that are related but aren’t specific to this mapsetMir wrote:
disqualified due to kalibe's diff breaking fruits sr
can u fix the wrong sampleset clap while ur at it
00:36:837 (4) - shdnt it b Normal........
00:52:212 (1) - also maybe remove nc cuz vocal pattern doesnt change here blah blah idk
didnt look at other diffs in fear of having an aneurysm
like literally https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/10573921 look at this this should be unrankable wtf
00:36:837 (4) - shdnt it b Normal........
00:52:212 (1) - also maybe remove nc cuz vocal pattern doesnt change here blah blah idk
didnt look at other diffs in fear of having an aneurysm
like literally https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/10573921 look at this this should be unrankable wtf
Topic Starter
@nao i didnt do the hitsounds, sounds fine to me anyways
not removing the nc
sorry a blanket triggered u so much
not removing the nc
sorry a blanket triggered u so much
not anything significant just wanted to point this out
Logic Agent wrote:
http://youjo-senki.jp/staffcast/[/size][/centre][/notice]
Topic Starter
xenonius wrote:
not anything significant just wanted to point this out
Logic Agent wrote:
http://youjo-senki.jp/staffcast/[/size][/centre][/notice]
i think that's just the new website being buggy. tried fixing it many times, so unless i'm really dumb i don't think i can fix it (without just removing the notice)
kidding me? LOLNao Tomori wrote:
like literally https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/10573921 look at this this should be unrankable wtf