1. Easy (1.4 stars, 87 notes)
2. Hard (3.25 stars, 306 notes)
3. Insane (4.59 stars, 415 notes)
4. Normal (2.11 stars, 161 notes)

1. Changing SV in Easy is prohibited, isn't it?
   
2. 00:04:395 (1,2) - Spacing you choosed for Easy looks kinda strange in patterns like this with overlaps, maybe change pattern or choose higher spacing?
   
3. 00:34:916 (1,2,3) - Those 3 nearest objects can form a perfect triangle, which is better than nothing
   
4. 00:48:788 - Add a circle woulb be better imo
   
5. 00:59:887 (1) - During all next 1st kiai you follow only drums, why not to follow the same here?
   
6. 00:34:916 (1,1) - Can be a blanket

1. 00:14:627 (3,4) - can be a blanket
   
2. 00:29:020 (5,1) - You did the same pattern in previous but in there was 1/2 gap, now it's 1/1 gap. This can be hard to read for new players
   
3. 00:47:748 (2,3) - And again this patter with 1/2 gap.
   
4. 00:48:788 (1,3) - I think you want to follow one thing: vocal or beats, not two at the same time. If you follow that electro sound, I think this is wrong, because vocals are important here, not these sounds
   
5. 00:55:725 (2) - cool slider tho
   
6. 01:00:927 - Maybe put a circle here? As you did here 01:03:702 (3,1) -
   
7. 01:29:713 (4,2) - This can be a better blanket

1. 00:16:187 (3,4,5,6) - Same spacing to a circle after slider as 00:12:719 (1,2,3,4) - here can cause a reading difficulties. I recommend stacks here
   
2. 00:34:569 (4,1,2,3) - Too many overlaps, rearrange this pattern maybe?
   
3. 01:01:101 (1,2,3) - Wow I like this pattern, something interesting

1. Check AImod

• [Insane]

1. and this is wat MA said lol
2. 00:16:881 (5,6) - 00:22:430 - the structure of the echo sound here shouldnt be the same as the vocal imo, since theyre different sound, imo decreasing the sv would be better choice to express the echo sound
3. 00:19:482 (3,4) - i think a 1/2 slider is better here since ur missing the piano sound at 00:19:655 - 00:20:002 -
4. 00:28:326 (3,4) - 00:31:101 (3,4) - imo keeping the spacing would be more consistent in this part, like wat u did at 00:39:424 -
5. 00:48:442 (1,3) - off stack

• [Hard]

1. seems like ur not using consist spacing on hard diff, idk if its suitable, but is kinda messy to me
2. 00:16:881 - same as insane diff, decreased the sv would be better
3. 00:35:436 (3) - 00:46:534 (2) - ill change to 1/2 slider instead of a 1/1 reverse, ur missing strong sound at 00:35:609 - 00:35:956 - , i dont think its rlt suit for this part
4. 01:17:228 (4,1) - off stack

• [Normal]

1. 00:04:395 (1,2,1) - spacing should be x1.1 here instead of x1.0
2. 00:09:077 (3,1) - 00:13:933 (2,3) - spacing issue
3. 01:00:927 - map the sound to keep consistent with ur first kiai, ur mapping every sound but not here 01:03:702 - 01:06:476 - etc

• [Easy]

1. 00:46:014 (1,2) - keep constant x1.0 ds maybe lol?
2. 01:01:968 (3,1) - 01:12:372 (3,1) - why not keep the ds here either, like wat u did the whole kiai

1. Disable countdown and widesreen support :eyes:

1. 00:08:557 (2,1) - Any reason for 2.48x DS?

1. 00:08:210 (1,2) - This compared to 00:13:760 (1,2) - , Theres a huge difference between the intensity of vocals between what these two support, The vocals in first case are much louder thats why i guess unstacking 00:08:210 (1,2) - these will be better since addition of movement will give emphasis to the vocals more than 00:13:760 (1,2) -
2. 00:16:187 (1,2) - 00:17:575 (1,2) - These might be intentional but are the overlaps really needed ? they are overlapping just a tiny bit and it looks kinda bad
   Same for 00:21:736 (1,2,1,2) -
3. 00:33:528 (3,4) - DS is inconsistent here, If you delete the 0.7x SV timing point from 00:34:569 - you will see the DS between these two is 0.8x instead of 1.0x
4. 00:43:239 (1,2) - DS
5. 01:00:927 - The melody sound on this beat is actually stronger than all others surrounding it . Its stronger (or equally as strong as) the sounds on 01:01:101 - 01:01:447 - 01:01:794 - etc. The beat being skipped feels really weird. So yeah, it should be mapped. The same sound in next pattern is mapped as well which is at 01:03:702 - . You can change the rhythm at 00:59:887 (1,2) - to http://puu.sh/wFo5X/4270941bf4.jpg which sounds similar to your current one and will easily fix the problem

1. 00:30:580 (4,1) - "Dont stack louder sound on weak sounds!!!"
2. 00:45:667 (3) - Since you are distinctly following vocals in the whole section thats why you should not skip 00:45:840 - For sure, The vocal here is louder than most others before. The "aaa" kind of vocal starts from 00:45:840 - Not from 00:46:014 -
3. 01:19:309 (1,2,1,2) - The pattern is nice yea but i don't think this a good idea for hard, because the sliders are ending in the direction that is opposite to where the next sliders start , This can totally cause slider breaks for newbies. But if you wanna stay technical and stuff then you may follow the same concept for 01:38:731 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4) - Too

1. Ai-mod :eyes:
2. 00:43:760 (2,3) - Why suddenly break the circle flow eh The song doesn't change here or anything. So yea you may ctrl+g 00:44:280 (3) -
3. 00:52:604 (6) - The slider is emphasizing the melody in a wrong way since the sound that you are following in this part is at 00:52:777 - but the slider starts at 00:52:603 -

MrSergio wrote:

[box="Kisses"]

Easy

1. 00:04:395 (1,2) - can you make these visually spaced like 00:27:979 (2,3) that would ruin my SVs' meaning tho
   I wasn't tell you to change your SVs I was saying to change the visual spacing ie the DS. A DS of 1.2-1.3 should do. Having 1/1 beat objects tend to not play well with beginners in general and I also don't see how not having the same visual spacing for all parts of the map would play better. Spacing to me should always be visual, not the numbers displayed by DS because you use your eyes to read maps when playing not the numbers in the editor
   -
2. 01:38:817 (1) - a hitsound addition at the end would be cool too. A drum sample just doesn't feel enough imo. how about a drum finish?
   I believe the normal finish is enough there (the drum finish sounds a bit strange to me there tbh)
   
   Well there is no normal finish here. You haven't added any hitsound addition at all.

1. 00:19:309 (2,3) - I do understand the need for a jump here, yet 3,00x seems a little too excessive for me here. This is a rather calm intro and the pressure slowly goes crescendo through the song, yet you have this huge jump in the calm part that comes from out of nowhere. I played the map a couple of times, and this jump always surprised me. Please consider shortening the jump.
2. 00:25:551 (4,5) - This one is even worse xp
3. 00:27:633 (4,1) - This one is fine though since the song stop being calm.
4. 00:47:921 (3,4,1) - I don't like the constrast between (4) being stacked on (3) and the huge jump between (4) and (1). The stack breaks the movement yet you directly have to deal with a rather huge jump afterward (3,59x if you don't the greenline used to speed up the slider, because yes, the slider is also has an acceleration). Not really pleasent and comfortable to play in my opinion. To fix this issue, I would simply unstack (4).
5. 00:51:563 (1,2,3) - Why is the spacing much lower than for 00:50:002 (1,2,3) - or 00:53:124 (1,2,3,4,5) - ?
6. 00:57:025 - Sounds like a circle is missing here.
7. 01:17:748 (1,2,3) - I think you should not vertically position them as they do not contrast with 01:16:534 (1,2,3,4,5) - this way.
8. 01:28:673 (5,1,2) - Why does the sound on 01:28:846 - (that you usually mapped by starting a slider on it) is on a slider end?
9. 01:43:066 - You've been ignoring the vocals during this stream, therefore I believe you should keep doing so and add an object here to follow the drums (and especially that electronic sound you mapped on 01:42:892 - even tho the more regular drums stopped). Basically, it feels like something is missing after 01:42:892 (1) - because of this.

1. 00:05:609 (1,2) - Jump a bit too large for the calmer part of the song (especially because you don't really use jumps in the other parts). I understand the purpose of introducing jumps in this difficulty though since the Insane has quite a lot of them, but not large ones like this in my opinion.
2. 00:09:598 (2,3) - ^
3. 00:11:158 (1,2) - ^ (though this one is better)
4. 00:13:933 (1,2) - This does look like an appropriate spacing.
5. 00:25:551 (4,5) - Huge jump. (5) is already not that obvious to hit because the vocals abruptly end 1/2 before, adding some a large jump makes it far worse. You can easily fix that by changing the direction of 00:25:551 (4) - .
   
   The lower difficulties are fine!
6. 00:57:112 (1,2) - I would rather you unstacked those objects. What precedes the pattern already puts quite some pressure on the clicking hand (for a Hard difficulty), suddenly having to click a circle and hold a kick slider is too disrupting and might confuse the player.
7. 00:58:239 - I don't think there should be anything here. No sound in the music, and that kick slider with 2 reverses is a bit complicated to understand (especially since the slider is included in a triple. Too much information to handle at once for a Hard with that low AR)

Kurai wrote:

As per your request, here is my mod!

[Insane]

1. 00:19:309 (2,3) - I do understand the need for a jump here, yet 3,00x seems a little too excessive for me here. This is a rather calm intro and the pressure slowly goes crescendo through the song, yet you have this huge jump in the calm part that comes from out of nowhere. I played the map a couple of times, and this jump always surprised me. Please consider shortening the jump.
   Well, for starters, I am using a x0.65 SV which means the actual "jump" is something like x1.5 or so. Aside from values tho, I used larger spacing to match the increased vocals. Till this note the pitch rises, for then going slowly down. The contrast in spacing was meant to express such feeling
2. 00:25:551 (4,5) - This one is even worse xp it's an Insane and a not-even-half-screen jump doesn't seem such an exaggeration to me o.o
3. 00:27:633 (4,1) - This one is fine though since the song stop being calm. well... the song changed part lol. That spacing becomes the norm since this new part is more intense
4. 00:47:921 (3,4,1) - I don't like the constrast between (4) being stacked on (3) and the huge jump between (4) and (1). The stack breaks the movement yet you directly have to deal with a rather huge jump afterward (3,59x if you don't the greenline used to speed up the slider, because yes, the slider is also has an acceleration). Not really pleasent and comfortable to play in my opinion. To fix this issue, I would simply unstack (4).
   Well, visually, this jump is like the same of the ones pointed out above^.
   What I did here was using a small spacing between 00:47:747 (2,3,4) - in order to create a "slingshot" effect on 00:48:442 (1) - since it is 1) starting a new musical part and 2) it is really way more intense than the rest.
5. 00:51:563 (1,2,3) - Why is the spacing much lower than for 00:50:002 (1,2,3) - or 00:53:124 (1,2,3,4,5) - ?
   oh ye, I was planning on fixing this for a while but always forgot. I just found myself cramped in there, no real reason
6. 00:57:025 - Sounds like a circle is missing here. not sure about this one, since the previous squares are completely on the vocals, while the stream afterwards are focused on that... drum? In between I can't really hear any of those so I'd rather not mix things too much here
7. 01:17:748 (1,2,3) - I think you should not vertically position them as they do not contrast with 01:16:534 (1,2,3,4,5) - this way.
   I see what you mean here and it would be a nice detail to be added, but moving that single pattern makes all my other flows and emphasis screw too much (and I'm too lazy to have to fix 5 seconds of map for just this tbh)
8. 01:28:673 (5,1,2) - Why does the sound on 01:28:846 - (that you usually mapped by starting a slider on it) is on a slider end?
   because the first part of the second kiai is focused back on vocals. The fact 01:26:072 (1,2,3) - this is still on that sound I mapped before
   is because vocals were too slow to make them fit into the intense kiai time (I should have used a circle on 01:26:418 - and a 1/1 slider on 01:26:592 - ,
   but that sucked)
9. 01:43:066 - You've been ignoring the vocals during this stream, therefore I believe you should keep doing so and add an object here to follow the drums (and especially that electronic sound you mapped on 01:42:892 - even tho the more regular drums stopped). Basically, it feels like something is missing after 01:42:892 (1) - because of this.
   Tbh, I can't notice anything important there, since the drums I firstly followed for most streams in this map, if not all, stopped there as you said too.

[Hard]

1. 00:05:609 (1,2) - Jump a bit too large for the calmer part of the song (especially because you don't really use jumps in the other parts). I understand the purpose of introducing jumps in this difficulty though since the Insane has quite a lot of them, but not large ones like this in my opinion.
2. 00:09:598 (2,3) - ^ reduced this one since it was kinda big tho
3. 00:11:158 (1,2) - ^ (though this one is better)
   Let;s make a big point to all 3 of them above ^
   First of all, the last one has the same distance, if not even more than the others lol, so I am not sure how that makes it better overall (perhaps the fact I use a forced reverse flow with the second slider?). Anyway, to the real reason I used that: it is not a jump lol, but a stretched movement which should force the player to go at a relatively fast pace between objects but without the need to "snap" on them.
   Also, if these jumps are that big, why aren't 00:20:696 (5,1) - or 00:22:777 (6,1) - considered big as well? xD
4. 00:13:933 (1,2) - This does look like an appropriate spacing.
   00:13:933 (1) - next object is at x2.08
   00:05:609 (1) - next object is at x2.37... idk, is a a .30 difference that important with such a low SV? .-.
5. 00:25:551 (4,5) - Huge jump. (5) is already not that obvious to hit because the vocals abruptly end 1/2 before, adding some a large jump makes it far worse. You can easily fix that by changing the direction of 00:25:551 (4) - .
   Let's say I can do my best and convert the slider into a repeat slider, but I personally don't see how a slider abusing leniency + circle would be an issue at this level lol. I do much worse in the Insane and the Normal is pretty edgy too in regards of spacing, so I think this would have been fine as a bridge. Anyway, changed because I don't mind this here.
   
   The lower difficulties are fine! n~o~i~c~e
6. 00:57:112 (1,2) - I would rather you unstacked those objects. What precedes the pattern already puts quite some pressure on the clicking hand (for a Hard difficulty), suddenly having to click a circle and hold a kick slider is too disrupting and might confuse the player.
   Well, I kinda agree with this, but there weren't really many options if I wanted to respect what the song gives me.
   This is a build-up in the first place, so it becomes harder as it goes; at first 00:57:112 (1,2) - this was actually a triplet lol and to reduce the pressure on the hand from this I used 00:58:499 (1) - as a cool down before continuing so it should be fine, even tho intense (the Insane is kinda intense too in those regards if you notice)
7. 00:58:239 - I don't think there should be anything here. No sound in the music, and that kick slider with 2 reverses is a bit complicated to understand (especially since the slider is included in a triple. Too much information to handle at once for a Hard with that low AR)
   Not sure about that when 00:57:286 (2,3) - these triplets are actually just a click and they are placed in a mirrored manner to make them easier to read tho The beat there is in the drums as the Insane shows too.
   Overall I believe this part's intensity comes simply by the repeated stacked 1/2 and not by what follows them, since in fact of clicks the rest is rather calmer imo

1. 00:13:760 (1,2) - the style of spacing doesn't really make sense here because previously you used it for transitions between the vocal/instrument layers like here 00:12:546 (7,1) - . Using the exact same kind of pattern brings this contrast into confusion imo. What you did at 00:08:210 (1,2) - is better because its a note>slider thus less similar to your other doubles.
   
2. 00:15:494 (7) - nc to indicate layer switch?
   
3. 00:16:881 (3,4) - how about lowering the sv a tiny bit for these ''echoing'' sounds to make them differ from 00:16:187 (1,2) - ? Expressing them the exact same feels a bit weird considering the difference in intensity no? If you apply it, same goes for 00:22:430 (3,4) - etc obviously
   
4. 00:25:551 (4,5,6) - I feel like 4 and 5 should be grouped closer together and 00:25:898 (6) - should be separated instead as you're switching layers there.
   
5. 00:28:673 (5,6) - spacing isn't really justified compared to the rest of the pattern imo, nothing in the music stands out here. same goes for 00:31:794 (6) - . The little momentum stop you did 00:34:222 (5,6) - here displays this section in a much better way imo.
   
6. 00:46:014 (1) - why is it stacked? i'd think, with the emphasis on this sound it'd be separated from the rest of this combo. Consider moving it more to the bottom of the playfield to complete this motion 00:45:494 (4,5,6) - ?
   
7. 01:00:234 (3,4) - consider switching these around (slider>note instead of note>slider). Having the strong sound at 01:00:580 - on a sliderend doesn't seem quite right, considering the sound is grouped with these other 2 notes 01:00:754 (5,6) - , so it'd be rhythmically more correct to make a 3 note pattern out of this.
   
8. 01:06:303 (5,6) - wouldn't you want to follow these 1/4 sounds here? you follow the 1/4s here as well 01:09:077 (5) - 01:10:465 (4) -
   
9. 01:11:852 (6,7) - ^
   
10. 01:12:199 (1,2,3) - going by pitch, a more apt spacing structure would be this: https://voli.s-ul.eu/0gKkzMxq.png (spacing from 2 to 3 lower instead of higher)
    
11. 01:14:973 (1,2,3) - ^ and for other instances if you decide to apply
    
12. 01:44:106 - feels like there should be a note here

Voli wrote:

heya, you asked for mod, ill just post insane mod for now cuz im going on a college trip soon. will mod the rest when i get back

Insane

1. 00:13:760 (1,2) - the style of spacing doesn't really make sense here because previously you used it for transitions between the vocal/instrument layers like here 00:12:546 (7,1) - . Using the exact same kind of pattern brings this contrast into confusion imo. What you did at 00:08:210 (1,2) - is better because its a note>slider thus less similar to your other doubles.
   what if that's exactly the style, lol. I can see you prefer the note>slider approach but I do not have such possibility for 00:12:719 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - unless I do break my style
   
2. 00:15:494 (7) - nc to indicate layer switch? kinda sucks but makes sense
   
3. 00:16:881 (3,4) - how about lowering the sv a tiny bit for these ''echoing'' sounds to make them differ from 00:16:187 (1,2) - ? Expressing them the exact same feels a bit weird considering the difference in intensity no? If you apply it, same goes for 00:22:430 (3,4) - etc obviously
   intentionally made to look like that tho
   
4. 00:25:551 (4,5,6) - I feel like 4 and 5 should be grouped closer together and 00:25:898 (6) - should be separated instead as you're switching layers there.
   the full stop on 6 gives it more emphasis. The lack of movement between 3-4 also helps build this effect
   
5. 00:28:673 (5,6) - spacing isn't really justified compared to the rest of the pattern imo, nothing in the music stands out here. same goes for 00:31:794 (6) - . The little momentum stop you did 00:34:222 (5,6) - here displays this section in a much better way imo.
   the speed created between the two objects is needed to enhance the slowdown on the slider itself tho
   
6. 00:46:014 (1) - why is it stacked? i'd think, with the emphasis on this sound it'd be separated from the rest of this combo. Consider moving it more to the bottom of the playfield to complete this motion 00:45:494 (4,5,6) - ?
   change onto vocals layer
   
7. 01:00:234 (3,4) - consider switching these around (slider>note instead of note>slider). Having the strong sound at 01:00:580 - on a sliderend doesn't seem quite right, considering the sound is grouped with these other 2 notes 01:00:754 (5,6) - , so it'd be rhythmically more correct to make a 3 note pattern out of this.
   not focusing on drums at all tho
   
8. 01:06:303 (5,6) - wouldn't you want to follow these 1/4 sounds here? you follow the 1/4s here as well 01:09:077 (5) - 01:10:465 (4) -
   can't hear the same 1/4 tho lol
   
9. 01:11:852 (6,7) - ^ ^
   
10. 01:12:199 (1,2,3) - going by pitch, a more apt spacing structure would be this: https://voli.s-ul.eu/0gKkzMxq.png (spacing from 2 to 3 lower instead of higher)
    ye, but no lol. That ruins consistency with everything else. I didn't prioritize pitch at all.
    
11. 01:14:973 (1,2,3) - ^ and for other instances if you decide to apply ye, asking me to change one pattern I used in the entire kiai won't happen
    
12. 01:44:106 - feels like there should be a note here if on vocals, but I'm not on vocals xD

1. 00:16:881 (3,4,3,4) - would use the pairing effect you used for 00:21:736 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - here too. it's there.. kind of, just very weak and hardly noticeable imo spacing wise.
   
2. 00:39:424 (3,4) - 00:42:199 (3,4) - what's the intention behind not mapping those with low spacing like before? just for the overall higher intensity of the part? not an issue, more curiosity.
   
3. 01:41:158 (10) - maybe split that up into two sliders for the kicks? would make for a nice transition imo
   
4. 01:31:794 (1,3) - any special reason why those are missing the usual drum whistles? you use them on 01:34:569 (1,3) - too after all
   
5. 00:21:043 (7) - nc to be consistent with 00:15:494 (1) -
   
6. 01:34:569 (1) - this note confuses me a little, seems to defy all focuses with 01:34:222 (7) - for the sake of something i' missing apparently. i'd expect it to go along the same lines as 01:36:823 (4,5,1) - .

Deramok wrote:

might want to space out the & between the artist. i don't know what the metadata standards for these things are but maps like feeling sky do leave spaces, which does make sense. asked the meta guys

insane

1. 00:16:881 (3,4,3,4) - would use the pairing effect you used for 00:21:736 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - here too. it's there.. kind of, just very weak and hardly noticeable imo spacing wise.
   if you refer to the fact the third pair is more spaced, then ye I can add that
   
2. 00:39:424 (3,4) - 00:42:199 (3,4) - what's the intention behind not mapping those with low spacing like before? just for the overall higher intensity of the part? not an issue, more curiosity.
   ..low spacing like before? Not sure what spacing you're referring to tho ?.?
   Oh, wait, maybe I know what you mean, you're referring to stuff like 00:27:979 (1,2,3,4) - , right?
   Well, the whole pattern is a pyramid if you notice (it is rotated for each pattern, but it's a pyramid. I use that only on vocals ofc.
   The reason for that is simply that stuff like 00:39:077 (1,2,3,4) - is indeed more intense, while stuff like 00:27:979 (1,2,3,4) - tries to keep the constant kicks into account too (basically, the amount of instruments the pattern is covering changes and so the pattern)
   
3. 01:41:158 (10) - maybe split that up into two sliders for the kicks? would make for a nice transition imo
   oh, that's cool indeed, didn't think about it
   
4. 01:31:794 (1,3) - any special reason why those are missing the usual drum whistles? you use them on 01:34:569 (1,3) - too after all
   ah, that's because of two reasons: 1) I specifically used those drum whistles to characterize the group of 3 sliders which make up the maine pattern of the kiai (which you probably recognize: 01:26:072 (1,2,3) - ). 2) I used that part as a transition too: if you notice, from 01:33:008 (8,1) - things in the music change drastically so I couldn't use the usual 01:26:072 (1,2,3) - and keeping the same hitsounding didn't fit either
   
5. 00:21:043 (7) - nc to be consistent with 00:15:494 (1) -
   oh, you're damn right there
   
6. 01:34:569 (1) - this note confuses me a little, seems to defy all focuses with 01:34:222 (7) - for the sake of something i' missing apparently. i'd expect it to go along the same lines as 01:36:823 (4,5,1) - .
   ah, that's because I intentionally mapped more stuff at once since this was the most intense part of the entire song.
   The main idea was keeping drums as the main instrument (the clicks end all on drum beats) while adding a mask of vocals on top of it with the movement. Now, the issue you're probably having here is that I have the vocal starting at 01:34:395 - or 01:34:742 - and that's due to what I said just now: if I want to keep both instruments that's what happens since they don't fall on the same strong beat (which is indeed a shame).
   If I were to use something like 01:36:823 (4,5,1,2,3) - I would lose a lot of song expression tho, since for once, that particular sound on 01:37:170 (1,2,3) - is covered for 01:34:916 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - , not to mention it wouldn't make sense with the more intense section right there.
   
   If you happen to find some good variation I'll ofc consider it since it might be a little confusing (try playing it tho, it really works nicely as is already)

normal
01:03:702 (3) - maybe nc these? just because 1/2 stacks have usually been in the same combo while 1/1 ones were separated like this one is, was a nice, even if coincidental, separation that kept confusion at bay, but i could imagine it backfiring here. if you don't care or don't see that as a big enough risk it's fine though
oh you're right, I guess that's because I had longer combos before so now that I halved them those 1/2 started to be in different combos. Seeing that it was done in the entire kiai tho, it should be consistent enough (and honestly I hardly believe players of this level can actually see the color when it's stacked that way xD) . I would remove that combo, but then I'd have to make all the combos longer in the kiai which would then defeat the purpose of making it look more intense xD

feel free to call me back when you had someone look into the metadata of the song, because i can't find jack myself on this particular version of the song.

1. 00:29:020 (6,1) - 00:29:366 (1) - ctrl-h this? because of how this is angled the movement here feels very different from the other things similar to it 00:31:794 (6,1) - 00:34:569 (6,1) - 00:37:344 (4,1) - that all have comfortable movement
2. 01:43:760 (7,8,1) - would be nice to differentiate these notes from the rest since you have pretty different sounds here. Maybe change spacing, or have 01:43:760 (7,8) - as a 1/4 slider?
3. 01:44:106 - bass + vocal + wubby sound here, why not map it with a slider end from a slider that starts on 01:43:933 - ? would be more fitting imo

1. 01:39:424 (1) - NC here kinda unnecessary since you didn't NC on 01:40:812 (3) -

celerih wrote:

bg resolution kinda weird, you can use this instead https://celerih.s-ul.eu/bIMimQaT :ok_hand:

Insane

1. 00:29:020 (6,1) - 00:29:366 (1) - ctrl-h this? because of how this is angled the movement here feels very different from the other things similar to it 00:31:794 (6,1) - 00:34:569 (6,1) - 00:37:344 (4,1) - that all have comfortable movement
   doesn't look any different to me tho .-. In the end it's a simple back-and-forth movement, the slider shape is just there to not make it completely plain. If I were to Ctrl H this one I'd have to re-arrange everything else which seems kinda unnecessary when the gain is literally none gameplay-wise xD
2. 01:43:760 (7,8,1) - would be nice to differentiate these notes from the rest since you have pretty different sounds here. Maybe change spacing, or have 01:43:760 (7,8) - as a 1/4 slider?
   the only real different note is 01:43:933 (1) - tho Am I missing something here ?.?
   What I did for 01:41:158 (2,3) - is warranted by the kicks in the song, but I hear no kick on 01:43:760 (7) - so a 1/4 slider would be a bit "why?" while playing imo
3. 01:44:106 - bass + vocal + wubby sound here, why not map it with a slider end from a slider that starts on 01:43:933 - ? would be more fitting imo
   Ah, this is more a stylistic choice ahahaha. The entire map didn't use "wubby" stuff and in general I tend to go for circles on stuff like this one (I clearly like wub stuff (!) )

Hard

1. 01:39:424 (1) - NC here kinda unnecessary since you didn't NC on 01:40:812 (3) - bye bye NC

For easy/normal: mapping the most intense part of the song with just a long slider is kinda lame tbh, makes for a not very engaging experience, even if it is just for newer players, Apart from that the diffs are fine
I do agree on that, but due to the rest time after a spinner I am obliged to. If I were to map all the streams with something else which would not use some of the stream's beats it wouldn't make much sense: why am I mapping just some beats when there is a stream having a ton of beats equal to those I map?
By logic, I used something which was "the same" for all the beats of the stream. Might not be the most entertaining thing to play, but it's the most logical if I follow the song :/
If there are other options I didn't find please tell me, but heh... we have just 3 objects after all, can't do much about it.

call me back once it's replied to