Ellyu wrote:
[那你他妈很棒哦]combo color没换,再加上暗绿色bg,这色调搭配看得我真难受。
- 00:31:600 (1,2) - 跟后面一样改成折返吧。感觉不行
- 01:02:772 (4) - 总觉得低bpm4叠在3尾巴上好玩且好看感觉不行
- 01:05:819 (1) - 01:09:569 (1) - 把最后一次折返用一个圈代替会好玩很多,或者说你折返三次是故意的?有点不合曲。
- 01:06:639 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - 蜜汁绕圈,flow有点无聊
- 01:16:834 (1,2) - 往左移一点,6和1的间距太小了我觉得可以
- 01:57:850 (8,9,10) - 这里间距不等是故意的还是怎么的,这种小变距略丑
- 02:09:686 (1) - 这个转盘结束在02:11:444 - 会比较好,因为在02:11:444 - 这里鼓音已经明显出来了,随便加四个circle还是什么的应该不难
- 02:28:319 (1,2,3,4) - 02:30:194 (1,2,3,4) - 跟第一段保持一致都nc吧ok
- 02:39:569 (1,2) - 1/2能不能放大些,跟02:38:397 (3,4) - 看起来都没区别了,用缩圈特难读ok
- 03:11:209 (1,2) - 没叠好ok
- 03:48:474 (4,1) - 少转了九十度,或者说少了个三连
- 03:53:631 (2) - ncok
- 第三段副歌怎么没1/6了?
- 04:16:365 (6,7) - 这个叠起来没移动太难受了,弄个小三角或者直线多好
- 04:47:537 (3,4,5) - 自己叠自己叠太多了,跟整个谱面整体结构和氛围相去甚远
- 最后转盘越看越瞎,然后转盘尾你忘静音了
Fushimi Rio wrote:
00:05:819 (2) - NC
00:12:850 (5) - 这听着像个五连 或者三连接note啥的
00:26:678 (2) - 其实我觉得ctrl+g舒服
00:59:256 (5) - NC
01:01:131 (5) - NC
01:14:022 (4) - 应该是二连吧
03:30:506 (4) - 最好不用滑条 容易按两下导致后面那个note早按
03:33:710 (5) - 这咋没上面那个梗了
04:11:678 (6,7) - 这么搞7其实挺强的 但是这里7没啥声音 我觉得6拉长到7这好点
Regraz wrote:
Cute song!
[Best friend]
00:45:194 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Considering to adjusting this into a more apparent 2+2+2+2 or 2+2+4 patterns as per the vocals.
01:09:569 (1) - It is recommended to take this apart because 01:10:037 is strong enough for a slider head too!
01:30:428 (2) - Pretty overmapped. 03:00:428 (2) - Same
01:31:365 (5,1) - Considering an overlap like 01:32:772 (3,4) - .
01:43:787 (3,4) - Such a large spacing plays weird and abrupt amongst a series of spacings like 01:43:084 (5,1) -
01:49:881 (4,5,6,7) - Why suddenly four such sliders? It bursts the rhythm intensity without suitable reasons imo.
03:08:631 (1,2,3) - I would sincerely request to keep the spacings consistent across 03:08:631 (1,2,3) - and 03:09:569 (4,5,6,7) - .
03:30:506 (4) - This might cause potential readability issues for the current layout looks pretty like two circles.
03:31:131 (1,2) - These are not snapped. Also the stack of 03:31:014 (7,1) - prevents player from reading the reverse arrow clearly, which is definitely not allowed as per current ranking criteria.
03:40:037 (1) - 1/1 downbeats start to appear on this section so better map them out too.
03:50:819 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2) - Unnecessary and irrational difficulty spikes here. Strongly recommend to nerf them.
04:47:186 (2) - Not snapped. I'd like to recommend overlooking it just like 04:50:819 (1) - .
04:52:225 (4,5) - Place 4 in the middle? Better aesthetics. https://puu.sh/yFlLz/7b8aa785fb.png
Your current draining time is 4:59:532, which is not rankable. And you have already overdone the spinner extention. The actual draning time of this song is even shorter.