just giving a quick checkthrough for pitch relevance issues, idgaf bout kds
1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8 (lol)
Easy
00:10:234 (10234|1) - move to 4 Ye 00:16:780 (16780|6) - move to 5 ye 00:17:143 (17143|4) - move to 7 Same as above 00:20:052 (20052|2) - move to 8 ^ 00:20:416 (20416|7) - move to 7 ^ 00:40:052 (40052|6) - move to 3/4 3 00:40:416 (40416|3) - move to 6/7 6 (next one 7) 00:49:612 (49612|1) - move to 7/8 I make this one 5 because it's actually same pitch like 00:48:634 (48634|4) -
Normal
00:09:871 (9871|4) - move to 8 Oke 00:10:234 (10234|5) - move to 7 Oke 00:33:507 (33507|7) - move to 5 Oke
Good luck on ranking this masterpiece! <3 //Thank you very much!
1-9 / S+1-8 Easy 00:08:416 (8416|3,8780|3) - move to 6, it differs from 00:02:234 (2234|3,2962|3) - and you can emphasize they are different, and 3/4 jacks are on left hand, maybe it's not cool 00:07:689 (7689|4,8052|6) - *swap* would fit more, "main" piano is more noticeable than background sounds for pitch 00:49:612 - uuuu why no notes here
Normal Hitsounds interrupt the actual music, you might want to reduce the hitsounds volume 00:18:234 - note to S column? (actually I don't really understand scratch-placing logic in this map) 00:40:416 (40416|5) - moving this to 4 would make pattern more symmetric and emphasize that 00:39:689 (39689|6,39689|4,40416|5,40416|2) - are same (almost)
00:01:507 (1507|5) - to 5? same column as 00:00:053 (53|4) - for PR
00:13:871 (13871|5) - to 5? forms a different pattern from 00:11:689 (11689|3,12052|4,12416|5) - if it's to replicate 00:11:689 (11689|3,12052|4,12416|5) - but reversed, imo 00:12:052 - piano part is kinda different from 00:13:507 - part
00:38:234 (38234|2,38598|3) - to 4,6 respectively? hand balance
00:40:416 (40416|5) - to 5? same PR as 00:39:689 - therefore same column.
00:41:507 (41507|2) - to 2? column 2 is kinda empty
00:48:187 (48187|3,48634|4,49095|5,49612|4) - one column to right? 00:48:187 - same PR as 00:47:371 -
00:49:982 - add a note here, maybe 8? to layer the last piano sound so it doesnt end kinda abruptly
1-9 / S+1-8 Easy 00:08:416 (8416|3,8780|3) - move to 6, it differs from 00:02:234 (2234|3,2962|3) - and you can emphasize they are different, and 3/4 jacks are on left hand, maybe it's not cool I am 99% sure that these have the same pitch. 00:07:689 (7689|4,8052|6) - *swap* would fit more, "main" piano is more noticeable than background sounds for pitch applied 00:49:612 - uuuu why no notes here //Here is a note. A single note. I don't want to add 1/6 here. Spread.
Normal Hitsounds interrupt the actual music, you might want to reduce the hitsounds volume Good point. I will hitsound this once again later 00:18:234 - note to S column? (actually I don't really understand scratch-placing logic in this map) Nope. There is one certain sound i follow in for the scratch which plays in the background 00:40:416 (40416|5) - moving this to 4 would make pattern more symmetric and emphasize that 00:39:689 (39689|6,39689|4,40416|5,40416|2) - are same (almost) Arranged a bit
00:01:507 (1507|5) - to 5? same column as 00:00:053 (53|4) - for PR Oki
00:13:871 (13871|5) - to 5? forms a different pattern from 00:11:689 (11689|3,12052|4,12416|5) - if it's to replicate 00:11:689 (11689|3,12052|4,12416|5) - but reversed, imo 00:12:052 - piano part is kinda different from 00:13:507 - part Good catch
00:38:234 (38234|2,38598|3) - to 4,6 respectively? hand balance changed
00:40:416 (40416|5) - to 5? same PR as 00:39:689 - therefore same column.
00:41:507 (41507|2) - to 2? column 2 is kinda empty Accepted both
00:48:187 (48187|3,48634|4,49095|5,49612|4) - one column to right? 00:48:187 - same PR as 00:47:371 - accepted
00:49:982 - add a note here, maybe 8? to layer the last piano sound so it doesnt end kinda abruptlyNope. Won't add 1/6 notes into an Easy
I mean im sure this hates are not only for R3 ez short mapping but for uncomfortable scratches make me guess you haven't played any IIDX maps yet. Honestly this map doesn't need any scratch,or only one for last note if you want to add.Anyway this map is ranked now,so i hope o!m never rank these "IIDX style" again. thank you.
I mean im sure this hates are not only for R3 ez short mapping but for uncomfortable scratches make me guess you haven't played any IIDX maps yet. Honestly this map doesn't need any scratch,or only one for last note if you want to add.Anyway this map is ranked now,so i hope o!m never rank these "IIDX style" again. thank you.
You had the chance to raise your voice in this thread when the Map was qualified. I never mapped 7+1K before so i would be more than happy about every feedback, what is good, what is bad on my pattern. I don't mind honest feedback which try to improve my pattern. Complaining after the Map got ranked and call it bad or call it "iidx style" while i never tried to copy any kind of style. This doesn't help me, it doesn't help the map or the community.
Next time simply post maybe some pattern suggestion and explain me a bit in detail what exactly is bad.
I mean im sure this hates are not only for R3 ez short mapping but for uncomfortable scratches make me guess you haven't played any IIDX maps yet. Honestly this map doesn't need any scratch,or only one for last note if you want to add.Anyway this map is ranked now,so i hope o!m never rank these "IIDX style" again. thank you.
I mean im sure this hates are not only for R3 ez short mapping but for uncomfortable scratches make me guess you haven't played any IIDX maps yet. Honestly this map doesn't need any scratch,or only one for last note if you want to add.Anyway this map is ranked now,so i hope o!m never rank these "IIDX style" again. thank you.
You had the chance to raise your voice in this thread when the Map was qualified. I never mapped 7+1K before so i would be more than happy about every feedback, what is good, what is bad on my pattern. I don't mind honest feedback which try to improve my pattern. Complaining after the Map got ranked and call it bad or call it "iidx style" while i never tried to copy any kind of style. This doesn't help me, it doesn't help the map or the community.
Next time simply post maybe some pattern suggestion and explain me a bit in detail what exactly is bad.
no one answered my question to confirm mapping style.
shionelove wrote:
is this 7+1 or 4+4k?
if it's 4+4k i have nothing to say,if not i have something. and how did you think my feedback is just complaining?did you read actually?i said "Honestly this map doesn't need any scratch,or only one for last note if you want to add." anyway i also have a fault i forgot to write the reason.Scratches should be on strong,not loud sounds such as cymbals samplings scratch sounds,and shouldn't be spammed unless song is kind of shakunetsu or something.here is the bad scratches from IIDX
this is one of the worst map in IIDX because some scratches are on snare sounds,and they are REALLY uncomfortable.
bad scratch patterns.and missed important sounds for scratches too. these opinions are for 7+1k,so i had to confirm about style,but no one told me and 7 days gone. and if you want to try new keymodes,why are there 3mods and bubbled then a BN instantly gave heart? really bad attitude.
Easy by me | 100% Hitsounded
Normal by me | 100% Hitsounded
