-Tochi wrote:

• [Hill of Sunflowers]

1. 00:01:488 (4) - Strongly recommend a NC here as the rhythm changes to 1/2. its just a start of the map and rhythm is not that hard to grasp lol
2. 00:15:147 (1,2,3,1) - Holy shit, this game me a big shock LOL. From a chill piano part to some high bpm guitar lol.
3. 00:30:269 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - There could be added some NCs on this part to make it easier to read the rhythm since you didn't change the spacing like: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9213766 i think its ok
4. 00:40:756 (4) - Maybe move this to stack with 00:39:415 (2) - for more movement on this part? it'll ruin stop effect and also could misread as a jump so i'll keep
5. 01:15:512 (2) - Ctrl+g here and here 01:15:878 (3) - will be a better flow imo. imo both ways are pretty equal, and if i accept this sound on first slider will be in left ear and not in the center, that's not nice
6. 01:40:512 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - Same suggestion as the part here 00:30:512 -
7. 04:12:220 - 04:26:690 - Ehhh, you timed all that, but you didn't map it??? nice ending sounds should be timed !!

toybot wrote:

hi ! ! !

tbh i feel like the drum-hitnormal is a little too soft for being used as an active hs
prob will keep it but because idk whats better lol
[hill of sunflowers]
00:02:220 (7) - i think removing this would serve a dual purpose of being more accurate to the music and giving 00:01:244 (3,4,5,6) - more impact yeah, but sounds empty because of further slider tails on same place
00:45:147 (1,2) - i was not expecting such a large jump to 2 here, since the music doesnt rly indicate that as opposed to the sounds at 00:45:391 (1,2) - well map is not easy in many places xD
00:49:781 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - you could really do something more apt then a stream, esp since stuff like the drums and vocals arent constant 1/4 here i like the effect of that stream and mapping vocal here or messing with sliders will not be something i want
01:17:952 (1,2,3,4) - this would play much much better in its context if you'd just make it this, playing it is currently mindboggling it was on purpose, i might change it tho, will see
01:33:683 (3,4,5,6) - the way these are patterned would make an nc on 3 more natural imo yeah
01:53:073 (8,1) - i think switching hte places of these 2 objects wouldnt be that bad of an idea, follows rhythm and preserves the square shape o nice
02:39:781 (3,4,5) - linear patterns are cool, but having it this spaced out was just terrible to play reworked
03:25:878 (3,4) - uhh make these the same curve? u use a lot of paired sliders like 03:35:634 (3,5) - , this just stood out as weird k, i tried
04:11:366 (4) - stack this on top of the slider instead? the snare on it + the rhythm created from the triples before makes me want to move on that note i guess i did it already from delis mod yeah
besides some playability issues imo, this is an amazing map 10/ 10 thank !!

[insane]
00:02:220 (5) - same w/ extra, theres really nothing there i just cant delete it..
00:36:854 (7,8,1) - i found it a little weird that 8 is so far from 7 compared to 8 to 1, since 8's not representing anything rly that strong fixed
01:30:269 (1,2,3,4,5) - make this rhythm similar to 02:48:317 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - ? feels much better to play here iam retarded
01:47:830 (3,4,1,2) - cool pattern but really confusing, since there's nothing to base the rhythm off of unstacked them

[hard]
00:58:561 (5) - shorten this by 1/4 and add a circle after? holding here doesn't seem to reflect anything yes

PandaHero wrote:

400th post, huh

[General]
1. Моддинг ассистант ругается на normal-hitfinish, типа он с задержкой фиксанул, вроде
2. Сделай во всех диффах колоркодинг, а не только в ласт, пожалуйста я думал будут нк модить

[Easy]
Может лучше ар 4 поставить, бпм-то немаленький ладно

00:29:293 (2) - 1/2 слайдер+нота получше бы зашли, как мне кажется, а то там такая гитара сильная, а ты на неё конец ревёрса ок
00:34:415 - очень сбивает то, что ты миссаешь этот звук, может нотку туда? это для более крутого эффекта начала следующей секции
00:38:805 - опять пианино мисснул тоже специально
00:51:244 (1,3) - не очень нравятся такие оверлапы, но если его никак не избежать, то пусть будет по-моему все ок
00:53:195 (1) - абсолютно не нравится, как ты сжираешь вокал на белом тике - 00:53:683, укоротила бы слайдер в два раза и поставила сюда нотку 00:54:171 мне наоборот нравится, как этот длинный слайдер всю фразу покрывает
01:57:098 (3) - может сюда тоже 1/2 слайдер? Ты вроде не стесняешься делать длинные 1/2 колбасы без перерывов, а эта пауза смущает будет спам 1 2 я не люблю такое
02:14:171 (2) - о, а здесь бы я пропустила белый тик и сделала паузу. Ты так уже делал например здесь 02:09:293 (1,2,3), и это было клёво попробовал и как-то не зашло
04:08:317 (1,2) - а может вот такой ритм сделать? Так гитарка будет лучше фолловиться ага

[Normal]
00:22:464 (4,5) - а новички не охуеют от такого? По-моему для нормала слишком сложно, хоть бы под дсом это сделал, а не стакал да не
00:31:488 (1) - хм, ты вроде не вокал дальше маппаешь, может её убрать совсем? Уверена что тут будут миссать да с чего, люди ж с глазами вроде играют в осу
01:05:756 (2,3) - уже говорила про такие штуки, но тут хотя бы дс нормальный. Будет здорово, если ты сможешь обойтись без 1/4 в нормале, а то это реально сложно выглядит я хотел нормал сложнее изи, по-моему все ок
02:09:293 (1,2,3) - как-то резковато, может плавнее сделать этот переход? все плавно же о.о!
03:21:488 (1,1) - хз можно ли так делать в нормалах, спроси у Делиса можно, я в каталине также ставил

[Hard]
00:09:537 (2) - может побольше спейсинга на неё сделать, для читабельности? ок
00:16:122 - 00:29:781 - я конечно всё понимаю, но я бы сделала ритм в этой части менее плотным, чтобы был контраст с припевами ну так, такая же часть и в припеве есть!
03:14:903 (8) - может лучше на две нотки его разбить? ну не
03:22:342 (9) - закончила бы его на красном тике, потому что либо я глухая, либо на синем тике вообще ничего нет, а на красном пианино я дебил

[Insane]
01:31:610 (2,3,4,5) - может здесь лучше закруглённый стрим сделать? А то прямоугольный как-то странно смотрится =(
02:00:756 (1,2,3,4) - линия выглядит неровно, поправишь? ровно же????
02:21:000 (1,3) - меня маленько триггерит, что изгибы у этих слайдеров разные консистенси??
02:48:073 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - какая-то скучная линеечка, может тут что-нибудь поинтереснее придумать? Я бы что-то такое сделала https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9217800 ок
02:51:732 (3,4,5,1,2) - сделай ровный пятиугольник, чего ты как этот =(
02:52:098 (1) - а кстати, зачем тут нк? оО там звуки другие, типо выделил их так, что ли
03:17:586 (1,2) - смущает пауза, я бы на белый тик нотку поставила не смущайся все ок
03:46:122 (1,2,3) - опять скучная штука по мне вот эта не скучная!

[Hill of Sunflowers]
02:13:683 (1,2,3) - а вот эту штуку можно было поровнее сделать, типа вот так https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9218103 =(
02:51:488 (6,7) - тут какой-то очередной джампо-паттерн просится, судя по музыке, а не слайдеры не хочу тут
03:03:927 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - вот эта штука жутко похожа на эту 01:40:025 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - , но по музыке они разные, может во втором случае что-то другое придумать? да никто не заметит, они в километре друг от друга
03:19:537 (1,2,3) - как-то они неровно стоят, можно же поднять 1 и 2 и поставить 3 слайдер под 1, как-то так https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9218162 вот это скучно вот
03:46:366 (2) - сделала бы ему ctrl+g не, я специально так поставил
03:46:610 (3) - подвинь его поближе к 2 что ли и это тоже

TheKoala wrote:

hey m4m

top diff
i think raising the ar a bit would help since the bpm is rly high and some of the 1/4 patterns are quite hard to read atm
00:19:171 (6,7) - would flow better if you moved 7 down so its below 6 yeah, but this one is flowing bad on purpose(just like many other things in this map)
00:24:537 (5,6) - you didn't use overlaps for these anywhere else so it feels awkward to only use an overlap here changed
01:16:854 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1) - im not sure how playable this pattern is, the flow is really unintuitive which does not fit well at all with the high bpm. i think using more comfortable flow with sharper angles plays out much better since players can actually snap to the notes aiming such angles is fun, comfortable patterns are fine but this is a climax and i wanted to highlight it, so players will think and not cursor mash over the screen
01:31:976 (1,2) - ctrl+G on these plays much better since it follows the patterns flow
01:33:805 (2,3) - ctrl+G like ^, not a fan the combination of antijumps and jumps at high bpm
01:34:049 (4) - add clap? yeah
01:47:830 (3,4,5,6) - stacking would look neater and be more consistent with 01:40:756 (4,5,6,7) - no i want that slight movement down to be here :p
01:50:512 (4) - copy pasting the shape of 01:50:269 (3) - and rotating it by 180 would look nicer i find non symmetrical objects be more beautiful sometimes and this is one of the times
02:35:757 (4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - this plays out pretty awkwardly too
02:50:269 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2) - i like this

insane
00:06:366 (1) - ctrl+G is more consistent with the rest of the part true
00:14:171 (1) - feels awkward ending the slider on such a strong sound

SPOILER

this rhythm represents the song better and the 1/4 sliders prepares people for 00:15:634 (1,2,3,4) feels ok for me and i dont want to interrupt silent part with tail of this slider
01:34:049 (8) - clap would be nice agree

hard
00:15:391 (2,3) - this feels kinda undermapped since the soudns are so strong, its a hard so 1/4 slider spam starting from 00:15:147 - would be nice
hm i feel like this slider is nice for introducing high slider velocity and instant 1/4 things will scare players maybe haha
can't really find anything else
good luck!

Komore wrote:

some suggestion for the top diff
00:05:878 (5) - 1/2 slider feels better yeah
00:07:098 (3,4) - increase the spacing slightly?
00:11:732 (4) - i think this should be two circle with 1/1 gap, but up to you
00:16:610 (3) - try ctrl+g
00:33:683 (3) - whistle on head? yeah
01:03:927 (7,8) - imperfect stack :d fixed
01:13:195 (2,3,4) - id do consistent spacing here, the current one looks meh
01:14:903 (4) - ctrl+g for a better flow?
01:44:781 (7) - nc maybe?
01:59:537 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - really cute resident trap? :3 owo
02:05:391 (3) - probably should be 1/2 to match with vocals i think following pianos better here
02:22:342 (6) - x=35 y=167 it'll ruin idea
02:36:610 (3) - maybe ctrl+g this as well?
02:51:488 (6) - nc?
03:29:781 (2) - ctrl+h?
03:36:610 (4,1) - should swap ncs, rn it doesnt really follow music drums are starting there
04:04:049 (2) - normal-whistle? yeah
04:10:512 (3) - probably missing a finish

cool map, gl!

bezbashn wrote:

ку-ку. м4м в студию
Это больше эстетический мод, если так можно выразиться
[Overall]
Включи нормально киаи, пожалуйста... мне не нравится как при киаях светятся слайдеры, не включу

[Easy]
00:01:488 и 00:03:439 имеют почему-то разные паттерны не очень понял что ты имел в виду
00:05:391 - конец слайдера опусти на 1 клекточку вниз xD
00:05:878 - конец слайдера 1 клеточку вверх и 1 влево
00:12:464 - сдвинь на х:404 у:156. Тогда 00:13:439(2,3,1) свдигается на 1 вправо тоже не очень понятно, лол, я подвинул слайдер туда и спейсинг сломался
00:17:098 - конец 2 вверх
00:17:568 - конец 1 влево
00:19:537 - конец 5 вниз
00:24:903 - опять новый паттерн
00:29:293 - конец 1 влево
00:32:708 - 2 вверх. Больше на эти моменты внимания обращать не буду. Надеюсь, что ты нашёл закономерность и сам сделаешь по всей сложности. это ничего не меняет
00:41:244 (2,1) - нарушено расстояние между нотами фиксанул, но нарушение расстояния в 2 десятых не карается
01:08:561 - прикрепи к клекте слева
01:10:269(2,3,1) - между ними разное расстояние, лол
01:23:159(1,2) - расстояние на 1 клеточку больше
01:52:464 - ^
03:34:903 - а-та-та. оверлап думаю новички не испгуаются
Зачем эти тайминг поинты ??? просто захотелось затаймить, для души !


[Normal]
CS 4 ??? мне нужен был посложнее нормал, алсо я люблю 4 кс
00:05:391(2,3) - Эти точки в слайдерах бесполезные, если они почти прямые... не бесполезные! внешне выглядят приятнее
00:11:244 - ^
00:12:220 - ^
00:22:830 - ^
00:24:903 - ^
И так далее...

00:15:878 - оверлап
00:22:830 - мне кажется, или в нормалах так нельзя ? можно, тут бпм высокий
01:09:537 - ^
00:31:448 - звука не слышно на вокале нотка стоит

[Hard]
Эта скорость, мне кажется, не для харда точно. Особенно вот это 00:23:439 (1,2,3,4,5) и 01:02:464 (1,2,3,4,5) и т.п. харды и существуют, чтобы научить игроков стримить и триплы прожимать, плюс бпм не высокий
00:31:488 - звук убежал

+ прошлые проблемы:
прямые не прямые слайдеры и немного оверлапов, но их мне лень расписывать. У тебя, у думаю, глаз-алмаз - сам увидишь.

На этом у меня всё. Удачи !

1. 00:23:683 (6,1) - suggesting to gtrl g those as they're on different sounds and that would make them stand out from the symmetric pattern while still maintaining shapes and emphasis
2. 00:26:732 (8) - skipping the main melody sound which usually doesn't get skipped and falls out of place with 00:24:659 (6) - skipping the other instrument in favour of the melody. could replace it with a note + slider in the same direction
3. 00:27:342 (2) - instead could be longer, would add tension as you've done previously as well
4. 00:34:903 (1) - don't see this one working as this slow short slider was introduced with 00:31:488 (1) - as a vocal tension builder while it is on a double drum hit here. so just having two notes doing the same job would be more apporpriate maybe especially with drums usually being mapped as circles.
5. 00:36:366 (3) - as to bring out the vocals more you could replace this one with notes as well hearing as there are no vocals on it
6. 00:44:171 (4) - in order to be in unity with 00:43:805 (2,3) - i'd space this away from the stack
7. 00:45:147 (1,2,1,2) - the spacing emphasis is weird here. 00:45:269 (2) - is getting way more attention than the crash on 00:45:512 (2) - without much of a justification. could be fixed by moving the previous notes closer like https://puu.sh/xYTfR/e7e8c02215.png
8. 00:54:415 (6,7,8) - i think it would be more natural to the vocals and the other instrument if the object order was reversed which could work with a pattern like https://puu.sh/xZs67/c58553135f.png for example
9. 00:56:122 (6) - making this into singles would also bring about the piano better while distinguishing it from the sliders that cover the drum before it. alternatively converting the previous slider could also work as it uses guitar sounds and would bring by the same distinction.
10. 01:02:220 (3,1) - adding a note to the stack would make incorporate the drums pretty nicely as you also did in the following stack, but i see how you want the 1/2 clicking stressed
11. 01:28:683 (2,3,4,5) - little consistency error here that leads to confusion on what is being followed. 5 should be a tick earlier and 4 in turn just one single
12. 01:32:098 (2,1) - these are completely reversed in terms of emphasis in a way you haven't really used in this map like this. 2 is a regular note of equal or lower value to the previous one while 1 is a cymbal hit. now the only quick fix i could think up for this without screwing with the nice overall pattern is if you just swapped their positions, maing them at least equal or putting 2 in a diamond shape with 01:31:732 (5,6,1,2) - instead uf putting it into the middle to retain some contrast, either of which still represent the diference of 01:31:732 (5,6) - to 01:31:976 (1,2) - as well
13. 01:33:561 (2,1) - similar to the above there's inversed contrast here, could be fixed by putting 2 into a sort of triangle with 01:33:439 (1,2) - which would also comply with the pairing of the other two sets of two notes
14. 00:30:512 (3,4,5,6) - i'd remove 5 and 3 for the sole sake of it being different from 01:40:756 (4,5,6,7) -
15. 01:41:488 (8,1) - not sure why you'd skip the note between those
16. 01:51:488 (9) - space this one of from 8 and closer to 1, also use the nc on this instead for consistency in the way of emphasised vocals
17. 02:35:878 (1,2,3,4,1) - unlike the previous pattern of this sort i don't think this one works. mainly because it starts too early which through that is also inconsistent with the other one. a possible way out could take an approach like. key being the low distance between 1 and 2 and the nc being delayed by one, incorporating 5 into the pattern https://puu.sh/xZt6v/7d2b428432.png
18. 02:47:098 (4) - same issue as in the previous chorus, since it's in both ones i wonder if i'm just missing something
19. 03:04:659 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - not quite conform with the song as 4-6 is only a double and 8-1 convey a quint in the song. can work as simplification in this slow part though if that's your goal. same with 03:21:854 (3) -
20. 03:24:171 (1) - not really supported by the song. i assume it's there to increase the impact of the following note though. not sure if that's viable in a form like this right after a blank space, might be.
21. 03:24:659 (1,2) - don't think those should be spaced so far from each other as i simply don't see a reason for it. it only takes away from 3 as result. coul do it like https://puu.sh/xZtom/c5e0135da1.png
22. 03:32:830 (1,2,3,4) - again i feel the emphasis is off with the turn and not really existent on the later notes. to keep the patter concept something like https://puu.sh/xZtrN/16093dc181.png could work out maybe
23. 03:36:732 (1) - maybe move it closer to 4 to create a contrast with 2 as this is mainly a filler note for intensity upkeep rather than anything requiring emphasis itself
24. 04:06:122 (1) - not sure about the spacing of this because you usually space off the initiations of those heavier drum triples from the previous notes

1. 00:22:708 (5) - i think that one should be a tick later with an additional note on the end of the previous slider to keep the emphasis of sounds the same with how you did it throuhout the pattern and to randomly skip a sound in favour of a less important one
2. 00:44:659 (5,6) - in order to differentiate rhyhtms here and to capture the guitar if that's favorable to you, you could remove that slider, make 5 longer and add a note, for instance on the head of 00:45:512 (2) - , after it
3. 00:58:805 (6) - since the previous note's sound really cuts off the sound pattern with teh sharp hi-hatit would make sense to not have this be part of it either as in making it a stale note instead like for example https://puu.sh/xZtS6/ae9649fa92.png
4. 01:18:561 (6,1) - pretty weird way of emphasising the sounds here compared to other parts of the map. none of the instruments get a proper spotlight in the constellation. to me it would make more sense if 6 was longer, 1 wasn't a repeat and they had a note inbetween instead in the fashion of 01:20:512 (1,2,3) - ignoring that 3 is shorter in this example, which could also be changed for the sake of capturing the held sound of the multiple instruments performing one on it (which is also the case for 01:20:512 (1,2,3) - )btw. in the second chorus you did it entirely differently in a clear drum emphasis way.
5. 01:12:708 (2,3) - odd to have a missing note on this rather strong drum beat especailly with the same one being mapped in 01:11:488 (6) - just before
6. 02:19:049 (1,2,3,4) - the 4th note isn't really the same as the preceeding ones in that it is delayed by a drum hit, so something like https://puu.sh/xZukW/3a4fda9e8a.png would make more sense rhythmically unless you want it to be simplified for some reason
7. 02:24:903 (1,2) - having 1/2 vocals on slidertails for just those two appears quite jarring to me as they're usually on heads.
8. 02:28:561 (9) - since there is a musical stop on 02:28:317 (8) - it would be cool to not just have 9 float away indifferently but maybe having it continue from a position close to where the stop occurred or even on top of the slidertail of 8. gives the part more contrast and impact and it would be more conform with 01:09:659 (4,5) - or 02:27:708 (6,7) - which emulate the tension build up with a long slider instead
9. 03:06:244 (4,5,6) - whird rhyhtm, especially with 03:04:659 (4,5,6,7) - using the hi-hat doubles and 5 being on nthing in particular. i know i'd opt to play 5 and 6 a tick later at least
10. 03:20:512 (1) - since this note really doesn't have much more going for it than the drums swap around positions using a triple like https://puu.sh/xZuLK/3ec26f808f.png which also captures the heavier snare. might just need some adjustments on what comes after it for flow purposes
11. on the note of what comes after it 03:21:488 (1) - skips the piano double which is afterward used for 03:22:586 (3,4) - . could be implemented like https://puu.sh/xZuXN/813130e11f.png or ofc with maintained directions if the previous suggestion isn't used
12. 03:24:293 (1,2,3,1) - i see what you're doing here with the rhythm, which imo mashes things together a bit much for my personaly taste, so i'd have a suggestions of the likes of https://puu.sh/xZv29/e745c56115.png
13. 03:32:952 (5,6) - would be cool if you didn't stack those two for the heavier snares and put 6 for example in a triangle with 5 and 7
14. 03:55:147 (2) - how about replacing this slider with a single note on the blue since there isn't really anything on the white and it would disitnguish between vocals and drums

1. 00:02:220 (5) - 00:11:976 (5) - 00:13:195 (2) - not sure if adding those filler notes is appropriate for a calm part like this, i'd probably advice to remove them
2. 00:15:391 (3,1) - i also don't think having this gap is recommendable with the guitar playing so prominently, especially since you do allow longer chains of objects like this just a bit later with 00:19:171 (5,6,7,8,9,1,2) - (btw on those, 00:27:464 (10) - the second last note is usually overmapped, but if that's intentional it's fine as an intensity upkeep)
3. 00:28:561 (5,6) - probably better to invese the object order here as 6 carries little importance to the song while both sounds of 5 are essencial to the melody. alternatively you could also just move 6 to a tick later, would probably work even better actually concidering how you used those sliders before.
4. 00:34:903 (9) - i feel like these sliders start too early for the vocals as you have drums on regular notes in other streams as well. so it comes off as conflicting with the concept
5. 01:01:000 (1,2) - would be cool to convert those into doubles to bring out the difference with the following sliders
6. 01:02:220 (3,1) - this gap is a bit random as the 1/2 beat still consists with at 01:02:586 (2,4) - and it only creates a weird skip on the first hit on the drum this way
7. 01:31:000 (5,1) - no idea why you'd lay it out that way as 1 is a tick too late as audible by all instruments
8. 01:42:830 (5,6) - a slider instaed of those two notes would make more sense with the missing note on 6 and for consistency as you've done this rhythm predominantly using sliders otherwise too
9. 01:53:195 (3,4,6) - usually you incorporate some nuance on vocals within the longer streams, so something like https://puu.sh/xZxcu/20977f51ae.png could maybe suit you. maybe the nuances were just coincidence though.. i'd like seeing them personally in any case
10. 02:28:561 (5,6,1,2,3,4) - since you used straight lines on the snare triple in the previous instance and the kink seems to be for pure aesthetic reaqsons on 02:28:927 (2) - something like https://puu.sh/xZxoW/da48b25962.png might work out better with concistency in mind.
11. 03:14:659 (1) - recommending to remove this one to allow some breathing room from the previous pattern which would work out nicely with the lowered activiy density of the section
12. 03:55:269 (2,3) - converting those to a slider would be conform with how you've been handling this rhythm in other places and the current pattern really blends over the rhythm, which is a nice pick up to have otherwise

1. 00:40:025 (3,4) - as you're mainly following vocals it would really make sense to have a note between those two. same for 00:39:293 (1,2) - and instead a removal of 00:41:854 (2) - would be appropriate with the guitar never really being in focus with it's 1/4 rhythms
2. 00:54:171 (3) - should probably be just a 1/2, having it be longer is kind of misleading
3. 01:34:659 (2) - might want to space this away from the previous slider since you're getting away from the stacking concept in this part and this is the only one still sticking to it currently
4. 01:48:805 (7) - instead of using a repeat i'd go with something like https://puu.sh/xZxRm/57d68da660.png as that's more similar to how you've handled those triple things before and just a repeat slider is a bit of a lackluster transition. additionally you could add another transitional note between 01:49:293 (8,1) -
5. 01:49:781 (1) - though to 01:57:098 (4) - conpared to the previous verse this part is much simpler and less dense and i don't see why as the only things that's different is that the snare drums are more prominent due to the missing cymbal rhyhtm, which i feel would encourage higher density in this verse while the previous one would use lower density with higher individual impacts. so in comparison i don't think this works out very well as part of the same map.
6. 02:31:610 (3) - you start using this concept of stacked sliders very inconsistently in this (and the next) chorus while it was fairly consistent, albeit not entirely so, in the previous one (which made it stand out nicely from the surrounding parts). i'd look into making them uniform in some way
7. 03:24:293 (1,2,3) - more confusing than anyhting else since the heavy hti is on the slider end of 2. https://puu.sh/xZyhy/2fd689f36f.png seems more logical

1. 00:53:927 (2) - might be better to just have a simple slider starting on white instead since this one starts unnaturally early and will be hard to grasp for newer palyers
2. 00:48:561 (2) - not sure if stacks like this are alright for a normal since you use 1/2 stacks in the very same way already. might be confusing.
3. 01:09:659 (2,3) - things like those might very well be too complex for a normal difficulty while in midst a long chain of objects like this. all the simpler 1/4 is probably borderline enough already while i assume those are going to slide due to the low bpm
4. 02:51:732 (4) - 1/4 repeat sliders with multiple repeats are strongly discouraged. i think even 1/2 ones would be. might slide as it's the last note of a chain, but changing it would be safer anyway

1. 00:00:513 (1) - right of the bat, a long chain of sliders is not a good idea for an easy difficulty with players struggling with slider mechanics the most of everything. so turning the shorter sliders into simple notes would help out a lot, even if it still keeps the object chain unusually long for this difficulty level
2. 00:17:098 (2,3) - offbeat objects like these should be avoided, especially if they're mapped in 1/2
3. 00:57:586 (2) - could remove the repeat to include more breathing space

2017-10-30 23:57 sahuang: actually do you have time for irc
2017-10-30 23:57 sahuang: not much to say tbh
2017-10-30 23:57 Mirash: yeah i think
2017-10-30 23:57 sahuang: ok cool
2017-10-30 23:57 sahuang: ACTION is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1426531 monet - Noborenai Sakamichi [Easy]]
2017-10-30 23:58 sahuang: 00:50:269 (3,1,2,3) - avoid the overlaps
2017-10-30 23:58 sahuang: 00:53:683 - maybe map this as well? The slider feels too "empty"
2017-10-30 23:58 sahuang: 01:00:025 - same here, maybe it is better to stop slider here
2017-10-30 23:59 Mirash: ye
2017-10-31 00:00 sahuang: 01:14:171 (3,1) - 02:24:659 (3,1) - feels bad
2017-10-31 00:01 sahuang: 03:09:781 (2) - 03:09:781 (2) - would be better if you add a slider here
2017-10-31 00:02 sahuang: 03:34:903 (3,1) - avoid blanket? you could flip (1) if you wish
2017-10-31 00:02 sahuang: that's all for easy
2017-10-31 00:04 sahuang: take your time, i will just post some stuff here
2017-10-31 00:04 sahuang: ACTION is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1426532 monet - Noborenai Sakamichi [Normal]]
2017-10-31 00:04 sahuang: 00:29:781 - clickable?
2017-10-31 00:04 sahuang: 01:15:634 (3) - can you rotate it so that they dont overlap
2017-10-31 00:04 Mirash: whats about that slider, you linked stuff twice 03:09:781 (2) -
2017-10-31 00:05 sahuang: oh
2017-10-31 00:05 sahuang: 03:21:488 - to03:22:952 - 
2017-10-31 00:05 Mirash: k
2017-10-31 00:06 sahuang: yeah that should be all for Normal
2017-10-31 00:07 sahuang: wtf Hard
2017-10-31 00:07 sahuang: ill wait till you finish normal
2017-10-31 00:09 Mirash: im ready
2017-10-31 00:09 sahuang: ok
2017-10-31 00:10 sahuang: so i think 00:16:122 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - is too dense, you might want to delete sth like 00:17:952 (1) - ???same for later stream...it is a bit too hard compared to normal
2017-10-31 00:11 Mirash: hm, it'd be like a full remap lol
2017-10-31 00:12 Mirash: bt yeah i see what you mean
2017-10-31 00:13 Mirash: maybe something like new advanced difficulty will work?
2017-10-31 00:13 sahuang: but i feel some places are not that intense
2017-10-31 00:13 Mirash: i saw people oftenly do them
2017-10-31 00:13 sahuang: the intense parts are fine with a relatively longer stream
2017-10-31 00:14 Mirash: so stuff like 00:17:342 (4,5,6) - is ok?
2017-10-31 00:14 Mirash: maybe i'll just delete all of 00:17:952 (1) - lol
2017-10-31 00:14 sahuang: basically some 3/4s are a bit unnecessary
2017-10-31 00:15 sahuang: idk if you get what i mean
2017-10-31 00:15 sahuang: like you can delete some last notes in a stanza to make the map relatively less dense
2017-10-31 00:15 Mirash: hm okay
2017-10-31 00:17 sahuang: i can mod it later if you want to make some changes on this diff
2017-10-31 00:17 Mirash: it'd be better yes
2017-10-31 00:18 sahuang: k
2017-10-31 00:18 sahuang: ACTION is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1424776 monet - Noborenai Sakamichi [Insane]]
2017-10-31 00:18 sahuang: 00:23:073 (5,6) - the rhythm is really bad considering 00:23:195 - 00:23:439 - are downbeats
2017-10-31 00:19 sahuang: you can swap 00:23:317 (6,1) - 
2017-10-31 00:19 sahuang: rhythm
2017-10-31 00:19 sahuang: or change the first one as well
2017-10-31 00:19 Mirash: i feel like piano is followed well here
2017-10-31 00:19 Mirash: hmm
2017-10-31 00:19 sahuang: 00:23:439 - cuz this is a bit weird
2017-10-31 00:20 Mirash: o
2017-10-31 00:20 Mirash: ye
2017-10-31 00:20 sahuang: also maybe 
2017-10-31 00:20 sahuang: try 00:23:317 (6) - reverse sluder
2017-10-31 00:20 sahuang: still a bit weird tho
2017-10-31 00:20 Mirash: i'll swap
2017-10-31 00:21 sahuang: 00:32:952 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - use some sliders here
2017-10-31 00:21 sahuang: considering what you do later
2017-10-31 00:21 sahuang: like 00:34:903 (9,10,11) - 
2017-10-31 00:23 Mirash: sure
2017-10-31 00:23 sahuang: 01:41:244 (4) - NC for better readability
2017-10-31 00:23 sahuang: 01:47:098 (5) - same
2017-10-31 00:23 sahuang: 01:47:586 (1,3) - swap NC so 01:47:830 (3,4,1,2) - this is very tricky btw
2017-10-31 00:23 Mirash: true
2017-10-31 00:24 sahuang: wait
2017-10-31 00:24 sahuang: im not sure how to change this lol
2017-10-31 00:24 sahuang: 01:47:830 (3,4,1,2) - but this is a bit trikcy
2017-10-31 00:24 sahuang: 01:53:195 (3,4,5,6) - 2 sliders work better
2017-10-31 00:26 Mirash: did something with tricky thing
2017-10-31 00:27 sahuang: should be all
2017-10-31 00:27 sahuang: i will mod delis' stuff with your Hard diff when you finish it
2017-10-31 00:27 sahuang: ACTION is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1419975 monet - Noborenai Sakamichi [Hill of Sunflowers]]
2017-10-31 00:28 Mirash: ye sure
2017-10-31 00:28 Mirash: fixed those
2017-10-31 00:28 sahuang: 00:29:293 - clickable?
2017-10-31 00:29 sahuang: 00:29:049 (6,7) - should swap for rhythm imo
2017-10-31 00:30 Mirash: feels like blue should be clickable for me
2017-10-31 00:30 Mirash: oh wait
2017-10-31 00:30 Mirash: ye i think it works
2017-10-31 00:31 Mirash: like the guitar(or something) at the background goes well with the slider
2017-10-31 00:31 sahuang: 01:47:830 (3,5) - NC?
2017-10-31 00:31 sahuang: oh
2017-10-31 00:31 sahuang: hmm
2017-10-31 00:31 Mirash: ye nc
2017-10-31 00:32 sahuang: 02:36:366 (1,2,3) - distance is a bit weird since (3) has the downbeat
2017-10-31 00:33 Mirash: ye i use these weird distancec for highlight
2017-10-31 22:48 sahuang: my pc was ded yesterday zz
2017-10-31 22:51 Mirash: npp np
2017-10-31 22:52 sahuang: i will check tmr, have an exam tmr morning at 8.30 zz
2017-10-31 22:53 Mirash: oh gl on this
2017-10-31 22:54 sahuang: :D

2017-12-11 21:33 sahuang: hoi
2017-12-11 21:33 Mirash: o hi
2017-12-11 21:35 sahuang: last time i modded to insane right
2017-12-11 21:36 Mirash: mm, everything except delis and hard as i remember
2017-12-11 21:36 Mirash: you didn't say much about last diff
2017-12-11 21:37 sahuang: i think hard is ok
2017-12-11 21:37 Mirash: oh nice
2017-12-11 21:38 sahuang: so last time i said insane was a bit difficult then you did some nerf if i remember correctly
2017-12-11 21:38 Mirash: no its about hard
2017-12-11 21:39 sahuang: oh
2017-12-11 21:39 Mirash: i nerfed hard, yea
2017-12-11 21:41 sahuang: ACTION is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1425805 monet - Noborenai Sakamichi [Hard]]
2017-12-11 21:41 sahuang: 02:16:976 - for consistency add a circe
2017-12-11 21:42 Mirash: o
2017-12-11 21:43 sahuang: 03:55:269 (2,3) - this looks pretty messy imo, turn the reverse arrow by like 90 deg so they dont really overlap like this
2017-12-11 21:44 sahuang: otherwise ok
2017-12-11 21:44 Mirash: yeah
2017-12-11 21:45 sahuang: ACTION is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1419974 monet - Noborenai Sakamichi [Delis' Insane]]
2017-12-11 21:45 sahuang: 02:35:634 (1) - remove NC, 02:36:610 (5,1) - swap NC due to downbeat
2017-12-11 21:46 Mirash: uhh let me ask
2017-12-11 21:47 Mirash: but as far as i know he usually nc for vocals and patterns
2017-12-11 21:47 sahuang: yeah maybe
2017-12-11 21:48 sahuang: ACTION is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1419975 monet - Noborenai Sakamichi [Hill of Sunflowers]]
2017-12-11 21:49 sahuang: 01:17:586 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1) - sounds like 4+4 to me
2017-12-11 21:49 sahuang: 01:31:854 (6,1,2) - the distance is a bit tricky
2017-12-11 21:49 Mirash: hm
2017-12-11 21:50 sahuang: also its better to make 01:31:732 (5,6,1) - more aesthetics if you compare it with 01:31:244 (1,4,2) - 
2017-12-11 21:50 sahuang: 01:40:756 (4,6) - NC
2017-12-11 21:50 Mirash: i feel 01:18:439 (1,2) - this are connected by some instrument and 01:17:952 (1) - this one has less important beat and nc here is for pattern readability
2017-12-11 21:51 Mirash: o ye aes
2017-12-11 21:51 sahuang: you did NC for doubles like 01:47:830 (1,1) - 
2017-12-11 21:51 Mirash: i use lots of awkward spacing in this one, makes things fun i guess
2017-12-11 21:51 sahuang: well personally i feel 01:18:073 (2) - has a downbeat and vocal as well
2017-12-11 21:52 sahuang: i see no reason not to make this NC and start of a ggroup
2017-12-11 21:52 sahuang: aslo 01:18:561 - 
2017-12-11 21:53 Mirash: ok 01:17:952 (1,2) - swapping this
2017-12-11 21:53 Mirash: seem nice
2017-12-11 21:54 Mirash: 01:40:756 (4) - nc only here seem more buty
2017-12-11 21:54 sahuang: ok rest all good
2017-12-11 22:00 Mirash: i did an update
2017-12-11 22:04 sahuang: ok
2017-12-11 22:11 sahuang: ok all good i can passi t at east
2017-12-11 22:11 Mirash: pro
2017-12-11 22:11 Mirash: owo
2017-12-11 22:12 sahuang: gonna post log zz

2017-12-21 10:00 Trynna: o ur job was not bad
2017-12-21 10:02 Trynna: its really watashi no koe to ignore 01:52:464 - 01:56:366 - Tho
2017-12-21 10:02 Trynna: 00:27:830 (1,2,3) - i think the same thing halfy said before applies here too 
2017-12-21 10:02 Trynna: try to make the players see that 2 is first than 3
2017-12-21 10:03 Mirash: ok
2017-12-21 10:04 Trynna: why u decided to not cover 01:27:830 - this thing, i think an 1/2 slidor would do it's job perfectly 
2017-12-21 10:04 Trynna: maybe just me though 
2017-12-21 10:05 Mirash: ok
2017-12-21 10:05 Trynna: 03:33:195 (1,2) - edgy boy
2017-12-21 10:05 Trynna: 03:50:756 (1,2,3) - o same i guess
2017-12-21 10:06 Mirash: same?
2017-12-21 10:06 Mirash: a
2017-12-21 10:06 Mirash: ye
2017-12-21 10:06 Trynna: 04:04:415 (1,2,3) - this one is ok since the flow indicates that 2 goes first
2017-12-21 10:07 Mirash: tbh new ar makes it less unreadable i cant imagine someone clicking 3 first than 2 lol
2017-12-21 10:07 Mirash: in any case
2017-12-21 10:07 Trynna: well, i do 
2017-12-21 10:07 Trynna: cuz i know easy players are -20 iq
2017-12-21 10:08 Mirash: owo
2017-12-21 10:08 Trynna: prolly it's all from me, stuff seems pretty cool 
2017-12-21 10:08 Mirash: now advanced!
2017-12-21 10:08 Trynna: 00:14:171 (1) - lol degen 
2017-12-21 10:09 Trynna: pause + circle would be a lot better u fuker
2017-12-21 10:09 Mirash: RHANKs
2017-12-21 10:09 Mirash: OK
2017-12-21 10:10 Mirash: rip edgy
2017-12-21 10:10 Mirash: shit
2017-12-21 10:10 Mirash: mirashit
2017-12-21 10:10 Trynna: hm 
2017-12-21 10:10 Trynna: i really feel like you should cover 00:44:171 - 
2017-12-21 10:10 Trynna: maybe you should cut it on another part 
2017-12-21 10:10 Mirash: where ;w;
2017-12-21 10:10 Trynna: prob 00:43:195 - or 00:45:147 - 
2017-12-21 10:11 Mirash: 00:42:708 - ?
2017-12-21 10:11 Trynna: since it kinda gives more intensity to the downbeats so ye
2017-12-21 10:11 Trynna: yea this one is also fine
2017-12-21 10:11 Trynna: but 00:44:171 - is a no to ignore
2017-12-21 10:12 Trynna: 00:56:122 - dont
2017-12-21 10:12 Mirash: ok
2017-12-21 10:12 Mirash: vocals
2017-12-21 10:12 Mirash: :(
2017-12-21 10:12 Mirash: but its
2017-12-21 10:13 Trynna: then u should put something 00:55:878 - 
2017-12-21 10:13 Trynna: this big pause is just unnecessary 
2017-12-21 10:13 Trynna: you are not mapping an easy diff u kno 
2017-12-21 10:13 Mirash: kkk
2017-12-21 10:13 Trynna: 00:58:561 (4) - maybe you should cut the chain here 
2017-12-21 10:14 Trynna: prob tail 
2017-12-21 10:14 Mirash: head
2017-12-21 10:14 Mirash: will keep head
2017-12-21 10:14 Mirash: for vocal
2017-12-21 10:14 Mirash: k
2017-12-21 10:14 Trynna: 01:10:756 (1,2) - vs 01:12:708 (1,2) - is really really weird 
2017-12-21 10:15 Mirash: they are same now
2017-12-21 10:16 Trynna: 01:18:561 (1) - maybe you should swap to 2 circles instead since the chain is ridiculous and it would fit the vocals better
2017-12-21 10:19 Trynna: isn't it a weird spot to put a spinner 01:47:830 (1) - ? 
2017-12-21 10:19 Trynna: u avoided that pause even on normal one 
2017-12-21 10:19 Trynna: u followed the vocals at 01:49:781 - and so on 
2017-12-21 10:20 Mirash: ;w;
2017-12-21 10:20 Mirash: spinner there feels nice
2017-12-21 10:20 Mirash: missing hs btw
2017-12-21 10:20 Trynna: ez 
2017-12-21 10:24 Trynna: 03:40:025 (2) - i'd try turning into circles since u have 11 notes chain holy fug
2017-12-21 10:24 Trynna: but song is getting at its end so 
2017-12-21 10:25 Trynna: you can say to him ooo density cuz end of the song!!
2017-12-21 10:25 Trynna: you have these two options here
2017-12-21 10:25 Mirash: ;w;
2017-12-21 10:25 Mirash: changed
2017-12-21 10:25 Mirash: but vocal was nice
2017-12-21 10:25 Trynna: rest seems just fine 
2017-12-21 10:25 Mirash: you can
2017-12-21 10:25 Mirash: post for kudosu :3
2017-12-21 10:25 Mirash: owo
2017-12-21 10:26 Trynna: o sure more activity 
2017-12-21 10:26 Trynna: trynna bn when 
2017-12-21 10:26 Mirash: yeah