1. melophobia (6.39 stars, 3031 notes)

1. 00:22:301 (3,4) - mak slider so 00:22:730 (5) - this stands out mor also bcz 00:29:372 (4,5) - this iis more dramatic but only 2 circles
2. 01:12:229 (2) - havin this go out makes this slightly emphasized, idk if u wan that, if u make it go back over 1 itll be less emphasized
3. 01:16:515 (2) - put this so it goes under el curve so tha 01:16:301 (1,2) - this looks diff from 01:16:301 (1,2) - thi
4. 03:47:373 (2) - can u curve this down because rn 03:47:373 (2,1) - this movement feels too snappy because it curves up
5. 04:20:154 (3,4) - pretty sur this meant for the drum but u follw vocals so if u move 04:20:154 (3) - this slightly off it gives a more smooth feel to go along wit the vocal
6. 05:19:192 (2) - i don really like this rhythm bcz u still seem to follow vocsal but this doesn do that very weell plus there isnt realy a note her
7. 06:44:393 (4,5) - is ther a reason why 4 is emphasized so much beucaes they go in lik oppostie directons, i dont think this needs that much emphasis so if u point it the othre way it wolud be nice

Maffe wrote:

I fricking love this map. Very satisfying movement and really nice.

00:56:373 (1) - This reminds me of 00:53:802 (1) - Which is why doing something like: https://i.imgur.com/F9Ulc4X.jpg would be cool ofc assuming it doesn't break the map in your eyes. This change is obviously to emphasize the strong sound. You could also interpret 00:55:944 (3,4) - These two as movement going in this direction: https://i.imgur.com/XSr2Ybm.jpg Then that change would be cool as well.

Update: The second change seems more what i was going for as it plays sort of in the same way you could play with intricate angles but roughly thats what my change was aiming towards

Aeril wrote:

1. 00:22:301 (3,4) - mak slider so 00:22:730 (5) - this stands out mor also bcz 00:29:372 (4,5) - this iis more dramatic but only 2 circles Basically 00:22:301 (3,4,5) - vocals here are constantly increasing in intensity where 00:29:158 - is weaker than 00:28:944 -
2. 01:12:229 (2) - havin this go out makes this slightly emphasized, idk if u wan that, if u make it go back over 1 itll be less emphasized
3. 01:16:515 (2) - put this so it goes under el curve so tha 01:16:301 (1,2) - this looks diff from 01:16:301 (1,2) - thi ??
4. 03:47:373 (2) - can u curve this down because rn 03:47:373 (2,1) - this movement feels too snappy because it curves up I did that to help build tension since (1) is a strong vocal and it leads into the end of the phrase
5. 04:20:154 (3,4) - pretty sur this meant for the drum but u follw vocals so if u move 04:20:154 (3) - this slightly off it gives a more smooth feel to go along wit the vocal I think how it's currently set up represents both sounds well
6. 05:19:192 (2) - i don really like this rhythm bcz u still seem to follow vocsal but this doesn do that very weell plus there isnt realy a note her there is some kind of vocal articulation change at this point so for now I'm keeping it
7. 06:44:393 (4,5) - is ther a reason why 4 is emphasized so much beucaes they go in lik oppostie directons, i dont think this needs that much emphasis so if u point it the othre way it wolud be nice 4,5 are roughly similar emphasis because of slider leniency, I did this to ensure there isn't some really smooth continuous movement to emphasize the vocals here

b00 wrote:

These calm vocals kinda remind me of shelter :eyes:
00:36:015 (3,2) - Keeping consistency. I'd switch 3 to be under 4. I think the repition of cursor location is fitting for the vocals mini buldup here 00:36:444 -
00:39:444 (3,1) - idk if this is you trying to be edgy. But it just looks ugly imo ok wAT this is actually something I do out of aesthetic compulsion
01:35:372 (2) - looks out of place for no reason the reason this one is shaped weirdly compared to the rest is cuz the vocal is much lower pitched than all the others around it
01:53:051 (1) - kinda ugly. Maybe put the red node in the middle? i did this out of aesthetic compulsion as well
07:36:662 (3,4,5) - this might throw people off this is just a regular stack i don't get what's confusing about it azdflkjasd;lkfjasd;fp
11:19:205 (5,6,7,8) - not sure why this is 1/8 its 1/6 but its to the drum beats brother



This isnt really the kinda map I would map normally, and most of the stuff I would mod is aestetics which your map kinda throws on purpose. As for rhythm, yeah its pretty solid
Pretty cool map. Im not a huge fan of the "messy" design but you've done it consistently. For the song it kinda supports it.

Halfslashed wrote:

[General]
BG is too large, maximum width is 1920 pixels, so get that resized. I also recommend you cut out the gray part on the side.
mp3 is 320kbps, get that sorted out too. kms

Hopefully with those two things you can get the file size down as well, because 32MB is way too much right now lol.
00:52:083 - 01:09:444 - 05:12:228 - 12:29:260 - Use consistent volume settings for both inherited and uninherited points.

[Melophobia]
04:33:440 (3,4) - This gap felt like a pace drop since you don't typically use stacks to emphasize vocal holds, I recommend having at least some level of spacing for a slowdown, but not a complete stop. vocals stop
04:40:940 (4) - Swap finish on the head of 4 for clap. crash sound added finish to 04:30:697 -
07:24:668 (3) - 07:28:954 (3) - Remove clap.
07:39:662 (1,2) - I recommend changing this to a 1/4 slider like you had at 07:37:948 (1) - to represent this guitar sound. This plays alright as is but ends up more stressful than anything towards the end of the map, which isn't really appropriate. its different as noted via rhythm i chose
09:57:366 (1) - Add drum hitnormal to the head of 1. also did finsih
11:25:634 (2) - I recommend placing this in the bottom right corner to differentiate 11:25:205 (1,2,3) - from 11:26:491 (4) - more. cool idea : D
11:54:794 (4,5) - The finish is out of place and hitsounding sounds very weird due to the timing changes. Try removing the finish on 4 and adding a drum hitnormal to 5. I moved it to a special spot and it actually sounds ok for some dumbfuck reason
yea

Lasse wrote:

https://i.imgur.com/YU6KuSy.jpg

could probably do hp5 to not randomly kill people on difficulty spikes late into the map, since missing on these types of 1/4 patterns often results in missing a lot of notes in a short timespan

04:18:697 (4) - shouldnt this have drumw too no this is clap sound
07:34:134 (4) - finish drum
08:07:988 (1) - this feels so underwhelming, the low spacing doesn't have any effect since 5-6 already kills the high momentum, so spacing this out a again or some sharper angle might be nicer aaaaaaaa i change angle a little but I think the up to down motion overall is suitable.

08:52:271 (4,5,6) - seems like it will be really easy to mistake as 1/6 with how you patterned them before, think just spacing them a bit more would be nice actually I make look more like stack
09:37:695 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - 09:44:552 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - think these gradually decreasing patterns would be cute if you added some sv decreases to fit with them aaaaaaaaaa maybe no cuz then wouldn't I have to do for the increase stuff too? which is d to manage and lazy boi I don't think it does much past visual effect

10:01:266 - shouldnt break be snapped to this? also fixed other breaks that new mp3 fuckd

10:37:890 (6,1) - why are these not overlapped like the other non-vocal ones? this is vocal.

yea

Mun wrote:

Hey!

I don't know how this happened, but it looks like everything isn't timed or snapped correctly.

EDIT: it looks like this is because my mp3 is wrong, nvm

i still want this dq'd

05:19:021 (5,2) - blanket?
05:18:056 (4,3) - ^
05:19:771 (5,1) - ^
05:20:735 (1,2) - ^
05:24:056 (4,2) - ^