Yahallo~~ M4M with Does :3
General
Cup
Salad
Platter
Ascendance's Rain
Scar
Call me back My Angel Benny-
- Your combo colours are very similar so I recommend you add more variation, try this:
[Colours]
Combo1 : 148,214,189
Combo2 : 255,255,138
Combo3 : 255,108,108 - About Circle size, dunno if you can nerf 0.5 to cup, salad and platter, feels better to this kind of song and bpm tbh, also for spread with higuer diffs.
- 01:24:616 (1) - this spinner doesn't match with your previous patterns ( 01:19:067 (1,2,1,2) - ), looks very inconsistent, instead of 01:28:778 (1) - spinner will fit better, we can discuss this part if you want but I don't see a logical reason to keep it cause the sound you are following with spinner begin earlier.
- 00:11:784 (3,1) - add more distance just to mark the difference of the strong cymbal, is not a good idea to keep the same distance with 00:13:171 (2,3) -, around 1.50x could be ok
- 00:13:171 (2,3,4) - this pattern looks messy, like if every slider work alone, they are not related to each other, 00:13:171 (2,3) - they should be mirrored or something similar, 00:14:559 - you can change the direction here cause high pitch and 00:14:559 (4,1) - should be related one more time and so on
- 00:15:946 (2,3,4) - they should have the same distance, I feel you are trying to keep consistency with 00:21:495 (2,3,4) - but at 00:22:189 - there is a strong cymbal that deserve more enphasis, so you can keep consistency at structure but not with distances, also 00:15:946 (2,3) - is stacked, it means less enphasis to 00:16:466 (3) -.
- 00:23:229 (5,1) - more distance to mark the difference with previous distances, 1.50x as a suggested on my previous points will create enough enphasis.
- 00:30:512 - NC to create the bounce effect with the change of direction, also 8 fruits at cup is meh haha
- 00:33:981 (1) - I know is 1/8 but you don't need to put a 1/8 slider at this diff, just 1 note here work as a simplification.
- 00:35:541 (2) - and 00:36:929 (4) - vs 00:37:449 (1,2,3) - the principal problem on your kiai is: what are you following? will you focus on instrumental or vocal? but it looks really inconsistent at the second one, my advice here is change 00:37:449 (1,2,3,4) -, e.g: 00:38:316 (2) - change into 1/2 slider as you were doing on your previous patterns, then delete 00:39:183 (4) - and move 00:38:663 (3) - to 00:38:836 -
- 00:42:998 (1,2,3) - here too, this kiai time, so I recommend you to reflect that in your patterns, 00:42:998 (1) - should finish at 00:43:345 - , then add a note at 00:43:692 - or use a 1/1 slider removing 00:44:038 (2) -, finally 00:44:385 (3) - should finish at 00:44:732 - and add reverse, this part is clearly audible that drums are prominent so I strongly recommend you to change the rhythm as I suggested
- 00:45:426 (4,1) - 1.50x works better to mark the difference with previous distances, the beginning of kiais should have more enphasis imo, keep in mind the extra cymbal sound.
- 00:48:548 (1,2,3,4) - same as previous points, you know, consistency~~
- 00:54:097 (1,2,3) - same as previous ones too, reflect the intensity of the song at this part.
- 00:56:525 (4,1) - 1.50x again to enphasize the beginning of the new section.
- 01:18:721 - dunno if you want to add a note here, just for consistency with the previous rhythm on 01:17:333 (3,4,5) -
- 00:18:027 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - this section in terms of structure is basically the same as Platter, I recommend you to nerf the density of your patterns, try with something simpler, adequate to a salad diff, also try to don't focus on vocal, the sound of 00:20:801 - deserve a note but you are skipping with the current structure.
- 00:32:940 (1,2,3) - will you use dash for every object on this section?
- 00:33:981 (3) - wanna talk about this 1/8 one more time, it's 1/8, you are right, but lower diffs trend to simplify it to keep the same base throughout the whole diff, that's why I strongly recommend you to change it into a note
- 00:34:674 (1,2,3) - you should reconsider the whole structure on kiai, I was fine with this kind of sliders ( 00:35:541 (3) - ) at cup cause I understood your pattern as the best simplification of the rhythm, but is not the same at salad, I suggest you a pattern where you can enphasize 00:35:715 - with a better movement, not a dash but at least something around 1.50x, 00:35:195 (2) - could be changed into 1 slider from 00:35:195 - to 00:35:541 - and 00:35:541 (3) - should be just 1 note at 00:35:715 - and so on for the rest, you could add variations changing some sliders into notes but basically I want you to enphasize 00:35:715 - better.
- 00:40:223 (1,2) - vs 00:41:611 (1,2) -, the second one fits a salad diff better, the other one looks like a platter structure.
- now talking about the next patterns, 00:40:744 (3,4) - vs 00:42:478 (3) -, why they are following different sounds? one more time I thing that the sound of 00:42:651 - shouldn't be skipped, I recommend you this kind of structure to use a pattern related to the diff, also with consistency (first note is at 00:40:223 - ):
- 00:43:691 (5,6) - dunno why jump here if the strongest sound is at 00:44:038 -
- 00:45:773 - I'll suggest the same for this kiai, just keep consistency as you were doing.
- 01:06:582 (1,2) - make this walkable, I know they deserve a jump but 3 jumps in a row ( 01:06:409 (4,1,2,1) - ) is too much a salad, also consider that the next pattern has double jump too ( 01:08:836 (6,7,1) - ), so it's better to nerf distances on previous patterns as suggested.
- 01:17:680 (1,2,1) - again, reduce distance between 01:17:680 (1,2) - to make it walkable, 01:19:067 (1) - definitely deserves enphasis cause is a new section, also high pitch
- 00:02:420 (3,1) - if your intention is add a jump here, increase distance cause this can be catchable without dash button, if you wanna add jump, do it propertly, same to the rest of this section.
- 00:17:680 (3,1,2,3) - it's a cool idea but antiflow doesn't match this part imo, if you decide to change the antiflow, add more distance to enphasize the change in vocal, cause this part is more intense as I see.
- 00:19:067 (5,1) - add more distance, currently, dunno if it is a jump or not
- 00:21:495 (4,5) - dash + hdash = not at platter pls, decrease distance between 00:21:495 (4,5) -
- 00:22:709 (2,3) - instead of such hdash I prefer between 00:23:229 (4,1) - to enphasize the beginning of a new section, also there is a strong sound that deserve hdash imo.
- 00:29:819 (2,3) - what a weird movement you have here, also they looks like they are not related, keeping a similar distance doesn't mean it's good, they should look good too.
- 00:32:940 (2) - just curious why it isn't 1/4?
- 00:34:674 (1,2,3) - I'm not agree on using jump to every object, you can make 00:34:674 (1,2) - walkable and keep your jump between 00:35:195 (2,3) - to enphasize sounds propertly.
- 00:36:062 (1,2) - 00:37:449 (1,2) - etc same as above.
- 00:39:356 (3,4,5,1) - holy... for one moment I though I was playing a rain diff, platters are supposed to be an introduction of hdashes, don't abuso of them, remove the hyperdash between 00:39:356 (3,4) -, should be enough.
- 00:42:998 (1,2,3,4,5) - I don't think this pattern fit the song propertly but I must accept that is fun and give variation to the map, in the other hand, I don't see a reason to add a jump between 00:42:998 (1,2) -, so if you wanna keep your next hdash, I feel that you should reduce the distance between such objects.
- Apply the rest on the second kiai for consistency as you were doing.
- 00:55:484 (1,2) - this isn't salad anymore, that's why I think vocal mapping isn't good, 00:56:004 (2) - should finish at 00:56:351 - and then add a 1/4 triplet on 00:56:524 -, it will fix the spread between ascendance's rain and platter, cause current gap is huge.
- 00:56:871 (1,2,3) - one more time I think that you don't need to add a jump at every object, 00:57:391 (2,3) - is enough imo cause drum at 00:57:911 -, same to the rest of the section pls.
- 01:07:969 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I'm more than sure that this is unrankable at platters, RC: " hypers combined with antiflow patterns must not be used. "
- 01:09:356 (1,2) - again the same, I'm sure you will fix it easily cause you are good at consistency
- 01:16:813 (2,3) - nope, they don't deserve hdash, one more time, platters should serve as an introduction to hyperdashing
- 01:18:027 (2,3) - this can't be hdash too, instead of this one, I recommend you to put hdash between 01:18:547 (3,1) - to enphasize the beginning of the new section, take a look to your salad as a reference, you did a great jump here, I was waiting for a hdash keeping in mind a good spread.
- I'm still asking me why you skip the sound of 00:19:414 - when at your previous patterns like 00:12:478 - 00:13:865 - 00:15:252 - 00:16:640 - etc, you were following such sound with an object, consistency pls.
- 00:20:801 - same as above, don't change from instrumental to vocal in the same section cause it looks messy (talking about structure)
- 00:27:738 (2) - add NC, migh looks weird at editor cause just 1 combo for 1 object at 00:26:351 (1) -, but for consistency, you are using nc for every 4 fruits at this section ( 00:24:963 (1,2,3,4) - ), if you don't want to add nc, remove at 00:24:963 (1) -
- 00:36:148 (2) - this note doesn't have sense cause I don't understand what are you following, if your intention was to keep consistency with 00:35:195 (2) -, your triplet should be at 00:36:582 -, now, I could interpretate your triplet same as I do on Taiko, triplets fit the song better after a high pitch or to enphasize a high pitch, it means: red ticks, as you did with 00:35:195 (2) -, so if you don't want to remove the unnecessary note, move 00:36:148 (2) - to 00:36:322 - at least.
- 00:47:160 (1) - same as above.
- 00:51:495 (2,3) - vs 00:52:709 (1,2) - rhythm is the same but distance are too different, reduce the distance between 00:52:709 (1,2) - please, not necessary this kind of hdashes cause you have a higher diff on the set.
- 01:06:929 (2,3) - remove the hyperdash here, it's weird cause you are skipping the hdash between 01:06:582 (1,2) - for simplification but you add on the next note, it's better to avoid it, just 01:06:495 (4,1) - is enough
- 01:17:680 (1,2) - now you have the jump here, when in the previous pattern you did on 01:18:027 (2,3) -, one more reason to avoid hdashes at this part, just remove hdash between 01:17:680 (1,2) -
- 00:34:067 (5) - no sound there, delete it.
- 00:56:004 (4) - nope, avoid long sliders just to follow vocal, this diff is supposed to be overdose right? well, do an estructure for an overdose, 00:56:004 (4) - change into note, then you can add notes at 00:56:177 - 00:56:264 - 00:56:351 - 00:56:437 - and 00:56:524 -, from 00:56:524 - you can add a hyperdash at 00:56:697 - too, to mark the difference with rain diff.
- 00:44:906 (4,5,6,7,8) - same as above, it will give more enphasis, also it will looks as an overdose diff.
- 01:18:027 (2,3) - dunno what are you following here, for consistency with 01:17:680 (1,2) -, 01:18:027 (2) - should finish at 01:18:287 -, then add 1 slider from 01:18:374 - to 01:18:547 - and finally 01:18:547 (3) - should start at 01:18:721 -, if you listen carefully there is a sound that deserve it.
- 01:19:067 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - why your sliders here are longers than intro? keep consistency, they are not exactly the same but the current structure looks like a platter diff.
I like this diff, great job here~~
Call me back My Angel Benny-