Nevo wrote:

bad mod \o/

01:27:562 (2) - does the spacing here really need to be this big since it has less impact as the note prior to it
01:35:826 (6) - I think you could increase the spacing here since its just as loud as a beat as the jumps before it
01:57:922 (3,4,5) - maybe tone down the spacing a little keep same with previous 0.5x
02:07:982 (2) - you can stack this slider head to 02:06:904 (3) -
02:13:012 (7) - this jump goes against the current counterclockwise flow you were holding for a while
02:17:323 (4) - I think the sliderend should be a clickable
02:17:862 (2) - the spacing here doesn't fit the intensity of the beat
03:27:383 (1,2,3,4) - I think you could tone down the spacing here so 03:33:131 (1,2,3,4) - has more impact

sry for shit mod lol

Ryuusei Aika wrote:

osu needs mooooooooooore TK
明天来送个摸

General
91Days放一下source

A.S.L
00:07:083 (2,3) - 这里的间距比00:06:904 (1,2) - 这两拍重音的都大了，如果你想强调一下那相比鼓点而言明显弱了的乐器是不是有点奇怪
00:09:958 (2,3) - ^
01:35:646 (5,1) - 不知道你这个是不是blanket，如果不是的话做彻底一点比较好
02:32:053 (1,2) - 你这个pattern建议和02:32:413 (1,2) - 换一下，因为它这部分音乐02:32:053 (1,2) - 和02:32:772 (1,2) - 是一致的，02:32:413 (1,2) - 和02:33:131 (1,2) - 是一致的
03:26:485 (5,1) - 这地方我没看出用这么大间距的必要性在哪，就是一个滑音用的间距比03:27:922 (4,1) - 这里都大了，感觉不太合适

I love tk (((o(*ﾟ▽ﾟ*)o)))

Faygor wrote:

was modding ur map ytd then halfway through i fell asleep lol boring map indeed ;_；

[A.S.L]
00:09:778 (1): Inconsistent spacing with last section but technically by a bit only although i found it rather noticable lol
00:11:934 (7): inconsistent spacing with (6), spacing is a bit too significant
00:14:808 (5,6,7,8): Looking at how u section the song and identify places for emphasis im not too sure why u didn NC this
00:21:994 (3): Also reduce spacing a bit
00:31:694 (7): decrease spacing with prev circle and increase spacing with slider for consistency
01:03:131 (2,3): Move this closer to (1) for better emphasis of (4)?
01:07:982 (3): same, move closer to (4) instead this time
01:14:808 (2,3,4): I think overmapped (unlike 03:13:910 which has audible drums)
01:23:431 (1,1): dam i like this pretty much
02:09:778 (3,4,5,6): NC here would be appropriate for its high intensity
02:22:712 (5): I would emphasize this
02:24:149 (5): same too
02:29:179 (1): I think u could have NCed the next circle instead judging from what u did at the beginning of kiai (i think ur trying to end the combo when the high pitched guitar ends right) just nc with white tick
02:31:694 (1): Unnecessary NC, don't see much justification for it attention for 1/3
03:01:515 (3): Inconsistent spacing emphasis
04:11:215 (1): I think the gap between stream and the prev section here should be less than 04:12:652 to better reflect that the song is reaching to its climax
04:34:928 (5): increase spacing with (4)

honestly its pretty good overall, i could only pick a bit of spacing issues
the flow is pretty polished imo, pretty pleasing to play
and i got a bit lazy at the 3 min mark cuz i was out whole day and therefore tired and want to sleep again
good luck!

[Kamiya] wrote:

m4m

[A.S.L]

00:22:892 (2,3) - 这里的节奏有问题,你可以2slider还单点 或者你把前面的1note改slider都行 都可以吧 我主要觉得这样放能体现吉他

00:32:053 (1) - 突然怪异

00:41:395 (1,2) - 这两个重音。叠起来会不会感觉不舒服。

00:54:149 (1,2) - 这里的距离稍微有点开了。没有强调也没有重音，00:54:329 (2,3) - 还不如想办法加大点这里的距离。

01:24:509 - 为什么这里开始不kiai啊。因为这是pp图（x

02:21:994 - 那你如果这里是kiai我感觉还有潜力摆更大距离。

02:21:754 (2,3) - 全部nc 好辨识 毕竟pp图(

02:31:814 (2,3) - ^

03:21:275 (1,2,1,2) - 会不会有点单调了 2可以设0.5x滑条滑条向上 还是不了 单点留空挺好的

大概像这样

04:23:790 (7,8) - ctrl g 会顺手一些

04:47:143 - 这里开始的间距感觉可以加个0.3~0.5，毕竟高潮部分（kiai）。不要吝啬pp

05:11:394 (6) - 还有一点 做个滑条吧。

差不多了差不多了溜了溜了。
gl

这个剪掉r18字样的话感觉还可以orz

Ametrin wrote:

几个艺术字也太掉b格了((((((((
我努力ps一波

Sandrew wrote:

路过kanade的q听说有人想要更过激的bg

这个剪掉r18字样的话感觉还可以orz

R1ku wrote:

Hi there!
So...
NM from my queue.

1. 02:21:634 (1,2,3) - This moment is a bit too oversnaped. Maybe something Change them to 1.5x oversnap https://puu.sh/yoErM/5411e7d123.jpg I try to use large ds all the way through the map and 1.5x here simply breaks structure here
2. 02:31:694 (1,2,3) - This moment is a bit too oversnaped. Maybe something Change them to 1.5x oversnap https://puu.sh/yoEwy/9c6704f2f4.jpg ^
3. 02:32:652 (3) - 02:33:371 (3) - 02:20:796 (2) - 02:21:155 (2) - 02:21:515 (2) - Same as 1. and 2. seems you have many issue on how I arrange 1/3 lol
4. 04:31:335 (1) - Need better flow: https://puu.sh/yoF4B/bfd29f01b3.jpg changed in another way

ShiiTsuin wrote:

o/

A.S.L

LOOK AT AIMOD (Objects not snapped near the end). Also, I'm not sure if it's just me, but i couldn't consistently time most of the notes, perhaps there's a bad offset or something (as I do note down a few instances below of where it seems like an issue for me).

00:15:527 (1) - This feels awkward to hit because of the increased spacing, and wide angle of the previous note, the slider head and slider body/end. Tended to break combo here from over-aiming the slider head. wild angle does not meaning it's bad. i know acute angle flow can make player feel smooth to move, but sometimes applying some wild angle can actually show the changes of music thus informing player "this is a new part"
00:24:509 (5,6) - I prefer having consecutive short sliders using similar angles for consistency. I do understand that 00:24:688 (6) is supposed to lead straight into 00:24:868 (7) though. moved a bit so 6 is pointing to 7
00:25:047 (8) - Awfully plain shape for such a strange guitar sound. That, and the shape just feels a little awkward, coming off of 00:24:688 (6,7) . i really think that is not an issue... just a normal bend slider
00:25:946 (5,6) - Similar issue mentioned already. Are these meant to kind of blanket 00:26:305 (1) or something? fixed
00:27:742 (2,3,4) - Wide angle. Not the most comfortable thing to play, even with the low bpm. i dont map for comfortable playing :/ and i feel that flow is pretty comfortable
00:31:155 - Heavy thump here mapped to a slider end, on a slider that has very little noise, intensity. Pretty sure that goes against the ranking criteria. this thump is not that heavy and dont have to be clickable
00:31:335 (5,6) - Massively spaced from 00:30:976 (4) despite very little reason when listening to the music. fixed
00:34:030 (4) - Thump here is mapped with very little emphasis, yet I above i mention large spacing with little intensity. im not follow the thump here actually. guitar has deserve more emphasize
00:34:389 (2) - Thump on slider end is much greater than noise on slider head.^
00:35:646 (1,2,3,4) - I don't hear 4 distinct sounds here, yet you map with 4 circles? i can here them :/ even there's no sound i'll still map it for consistency
00:39:239 (2) - Could possibly change position and shape so that it blankets 00:39:778 (1) or 00:38:521 (1) , as right now it's not particularly nice looking or comfortable to play. don't wanna put a blanket here. i think pattern now plays good
00:39:778 (1) - Pretty sure thump on slider end is greater than start of vocals on slider head. im following vocal here
00:41:395 (1) - Is it me, or does the thump seem to come a bit after you press the circle? TK's song always have some random off. just keep it like this so player wont hurt their acc
00:49:568 to 00:49:838 - feels like there's several noises, especially one on 00:49:568 . u don;t have to map all the sounds u hear especially in a quiet part
00:51:275 (1,2) - Very little emphasis compared to 00:51:814 (3,4) , despite the music suggesting otherwise. fixed
00:54:149 (1) - I ended up treating this as a 1/2 gap the first time i saw it, as you use the exact same spacing (none) for both 1/2 and 3/4. ...u r the first one missed this orz i think music here is kinda clear and stacking notes are pretty hard to misread ._.
00:59:898 (4) - Another thump on the slider end, which is more intense than the slider head. fixed
01:00:437 (6) - I don't actually think there is any sound here? 1/1 gap here will be weird
01:00:796 (2) - I shall stop mentioning this issue of drum kicks or whatever being mapped to slider ends, otherwise this will be a LONG wallmod. fixed here
01:06:185 (1,2) - Would look nicer if they were both the same shape (and if there was more consideration of angular consistency). fixed
01:10:497 (2,3) - These sliders go in complete opposite directions >.< Consider implied movement of slider shapes. previous are fine
01:11:215 (4) - Not sure if this was meant to, but it badly blankets 01:11:934 (6) Which looks messy. nothing blanket here ...
01:14:808 (2,3,4) - I don't hear anything that would suggest the need of a triple. vocal ._.
01:38:521 (4) - Bad overlap with 01:37:802 (2) . fixed
02:09:778 (1,2,3,4) - Not a huge fan of the angles, but i guess it looks alright since they kind of fan out? then they are all right
02:31:694 (1,2,3) - Not a huge fan of the cursor walking, or the sudden 1/6 timing. Since it looks like one of the only places where 1/6 timing is used, I'd suggest passively mapping it/ i applied 1/6 at whenever they showed so i'll keep them from now
04:16:964 - Kinda feels like Kiai should start here, but it does make more sense to have it at 04:19:838 instead. then no problem here
04:58:640 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Not the prettiest pattern in the world, and i did find myself dropping one or two slider ends here. im a bod mapper since i cant come up anything interesting ;w;

I didn't exactly mod everything, as most of it was just repeated "errors" or whatever, so I didn't want to flood you with a massive list of the same stuff. Not sure how helpful this mod was, but good luck getting this Approved/Ranked!
seems my mapping style does not make you feels good but ur mod still very helpful! thank you!

6th wrote:

Hi !

[A.S.L]

00:02:592 (1) - Is it me or that spinner sounds clearly overmapped lol shortened it lel
00:26:305 (1,2,3,4,1) - That slider shape makes the flow a bit hard to follow. You may want to use something a bit smoother like http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9579400
00:57:383 - Ignoring that feels weird since you never do it throughout the map.
01:23:790 (1,1) - Imo the 2nd slider here would have much more impact if the spacing between them was shorter. Something like this http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9579428 would work pretty well for example.
02:21:634 (1,2,3,1) - That curve feels really hard to perform to me, idk. Moving the slider a bit to the left would help.
03:18:670 (8,1) - I don't really get it, song is getting less intense but you put a jump. It doesn't make much sense imo. just wanna made this part no that boring :/ keep it for now
03:58:281 (1) - Not sure if this deserves that much spacing considering how flow makes it harder to catch.
04:22:173 (6,7,8) - This felt a bit overspaced.

Good map.

1. 00:02:772 - The spinner is a bit too short tbh lol. you could safely start it from 00:02:772 - here since the held sound in the song also starts from this point
2. 01:00:077 - 01:00:167 - The beats are stronger than 01:00:347 - 01:00:437 - so it would be cooler to have 01:00:077 - these mapped as well
3. 01:23:431 (1) - A lot better as two circles instead because the drums are really strong here. you did two circles at 03:21:275 (1,2) - as well so ye
4. 01:23:431 (1) - Also using some kind of hitsounds here such as drum clap would be nice. leaving it without hs doesn't sound that good
5. 01:32:772 (4) - Remove clap
6. 03:18:670 (8,1) - The jump is totally unnecessary and doesn't make much sense at all
7. 04:04:030 (1) - Remove finish from the whole slider

xJ1 wrote:

Heyo, from my mod queue

A.S.L:

I think the sound starts here 00:02:772 - for the spinner, also it helps not always getting a 100 on it ^-^ lol

01:28:820 (1,2) - 2 can be 180 degree rotate of 1 for better flow and aesthetics i think pattern now have better flow

01:46:784 (5,6) - Spacing here should be lowered

02:21:634 (1,2,3) - This is very hard to hit, idk when I playtested, it was a pain to hit, mapping it passively could help idk but will change later

02:31:694 (1,2,3) - Idk, imo, I think these should be played passively since it's really hard to hit it with 4 consecutive 1/4 sliders preceding it ...i'll come up a new pattern to figure it out ;w;

General:

I really like this map, it flows very well and plays smoothly. GL~! Thank you!

Sinnoh wrote:

00:04:030 (1) - You could easily use many more whistles or clack sounds in this area, currently not enough feedback. Could also increase volume since 20% is too low.
00:10:137 (3,6) - Why not blanket this?
00:13:550 (7) - Move this to y=210, 90 degrees is a bit more organised. do put a bit down but i guess is not the way you said lol
00:14:808 (1) - You're missing custom hitsounds, these are default claps.
00:38:521 (1) - Why not move dont think necessary
01:10:497 (2,3) - This jump is quite overspaced, violin isn’t really strong enough for this jump.
01:34:568 (1,2) - Use of not circular flow is a bit much here, ctrl-j each slider would be much more comfortable to play. didnt change 2 cuz i wanna break the flow here
01:36:544 (2,3,4) - Same as above. I think this could work if you can ctrl-j 01:36:724 (3,4,5,1,2) - and do some adjustments.
01:43:191 (1,2,3,4) - Overspaced compared to 01:31:694 (1,2,3) -
01:58:640 (7,8) - You can still focus on the snares with ½ clickable rhythm if you make these ¼ sliders, would follow the really dominant ¼ here. during this part i don't want to show any 1/4 unless i think really necessary (like 01:58:191 (4) - ). btw they are 1/8 lul
03:13:910 (6,7,8) - Lots of ¼ here, could use a buzz slider or something then it will be to intense imo

Set looks fine but I don’t nominate stuff with unreasonably high spacing like this, even if it’s not farmable. Just not my kind of set (marathons are zzzzzzz for me sorry)
That's why i hate mapping marathon since it's really boring and can never get ranked zzzz i'll find you with another short map when u open u q again (￣︶￣)

DeRandom Otaku wrote:

1. 00:02:772 - The spinner is a bit too short tbh lol. you could safely start it from 00:02:772 - here since the held sound in the song also starts from this point
2. 01:00:077 - 01:00:167 - The beats are stronger than 01:00:347 - 01:00:437 - so it would be cooler to have 01:00:077 - these mapped as well
3. 01:23:431 (1) - A lot better as two circles instead because the drums are really strong here. you did two circles at 03:21:275 (1,2) - as well so ye
4. 01:23:431 (1) - Also using some kind of hitsounds here such as drum clap would be nice. leaving it without hs doesn't sound that good
5. 01:32:772 (4) - Remove clap
6. 03:18:670 (8,1) - The jump is totally unnecessary and doesn't make much sense at all
7. 04:04:030 (1) - Remove finish from the whole slider

yea, reply to previous mods and this one and call me back all fixed

1. 00:14:808 - Increase volume to 35
2. 02:44:988 - Isn't this section supposed to have gray combo colors? Its not much different from 02:50:736 -
3. 01:23:431 (1,2) - Circles are nicer but jump would make it a lot better. Anti jump doesn't go well with the song and plays weirdly considering how strong the drums are
4. 04:59:718 (1,2,1) - The song is 1/3 here

DeRandom Otaku wrote:

1. 00:14:808 - Increase volume to 35 Sure
2. 02:44:988 - Isn't this section supposed to have gray combo colors? Its not much different from 02:50:736 - ok
3. 01:23:431 (1,2) - Circles are nicer but jump would make it a lot better. Anti jump doesn't go well with the song and plays weirdly considering how strong the drums are applied some jumps here
4. 04:59:718 (1,2,1) - The song is 1/3 here i'd like to ignore drums at background. 1/3 is not that apparent so follow guitar here is more reasonable choice imo

Meat Inspector wrote:

offset should be +15 -> so you need a rebubble (also for the first redline, its messed up because when you look at the timing right before the second redline its 1ms off pls make it line up) i set offset +12 now it should be good. also red line was fixed


quick thoughts tho
compare 01:23:431 (1,2,1) - and 03:21:275 (1,2,1,2) - I'm not really a fan of how you ignore the vocals the second time and not the first, it comes off as inconsistent, if you were going to map 03:21:814 (1,2) - i would say ignore the vocals in the first part as well. I would say you have to pick between the two on the second part there are two additional drum hit which don't show up in the first part, and that's why I chose to follow vocal at first part. so no change here

some streams are very clearly additive like 04:25:317 (9,10,11,1) - 04:11:215 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 04:11:215 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - etc pls look into this (most noteably the yellow tick notes for them)
04:29:898 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - this is extremely ambiguous but I think its still 1/3 (or 1/6 for this bpm)
04:36:365 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - most of these are additive

04:25:317 (9,10,11,1) - for this one, nice catch. i didn't notice that there is no clear 1/4 （/w\）. However i put some kick sliders here so that they don't lose their intensity
For the rest, i think they are fine cuz they kinda feel like guitar tremolo (Yeah i googled for that word lol) to me so some stream would be nice imo

also 04:21:455 (1,2,3) - stuff like this is technically additive but its good because of the guitar stuff so pls keep

good luck

Thank you!

Chromoxx wrote:

hi

01:03:131 (2,3) - maybe ctrl the rhythm here and rearrange pattern accordingly for better vocal emphasis? nice!
02:31:694 (1,2,3) - it's pretty hard to tell that these are 1/3 from the visual spacing and there isn't any natural leadup to it like there was at 02:19:838 - so i'd suggest making these a slider instead rebuilt this part so now they are just like 02:20:566 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3) - (and also become much harder)
03:55:407 (1,2,3,4) - this is kinda personal but i don't really find the stacks here visually appealing, you also don't really seem to use stuff like this in the rest of the diff, maybe space them normally instead? ok :3 (and they turned harder too omg)

nothing more, really nice map!

Thank you for your help!

Also raised ar to 9.2 cuz i found those 1/6 were kinda hard to read. Hope this work :S

Kurai wrote:

Hey! Why did you put 91Days in the tags and not in the source?

Ryuusei Aika wrote:

91Days放一下source

Ryuusei Aika wrote:

Ryuusei Aika wrote:

91Days放一下source

GG当时没反应过来什么意思想了半天Source是啥玩意

求求你再多做点凛冽时雨吧我爱死这个乐队了

Feb wrote:

don't want to be assparty here, but noticed following while playing because it might be because you forgot to place it down

02:47:872 (1,2,3) - is the note on 02:48:231 - purposely missing
because if yes it's quite confusing to play that other one being mapped right after at 02:48:950 (3) - with identical patterns and identical sounds.

Good map tho keep it up. Liked that other Tk map from you too.

it's not a missing, i just followed piano here and some abnormal break at this quite part works pretty well imo
Thank you for your attention! Hope you enjoy it:3