Hey n1do
Sorry for the late reply, I was really busy irl.
M4M from my queue
General
I feel like the SV could be a bit higher. Especially in the slower sections with 1.0 BPM multiplier it doesn't feel that comfortable. But then again I suck horribly at low BPM maps so this might just be me.
Heh. "funnypicturename.jpg" It's at 1365x768 resolution though which kinda bugs me, there was probably a small mistake while downscaling it. If you would switch that out with 1366x768 that would be awesome ^^
Oni
How about adding dons after the first 2 kats in the k k k k patterns at 00:01:502, 00:02:154, 00:06:719 and 00:07:371. This would be more interesting to play, add a little bit of variety and sound better imo
00:57:262 (171) - d to follow the pitch of the vocals
00:58:567 (176) - k would sound a bit better here
01:39:654 (320,321) - another drumroll instead? To follow how you previously mapped this sound
01:40:958 (325,326,327,328,329) - I am a bit unsure about these 1/8 patterns here. While alright to play they are a rather sharp contrast to the difficulty of the patterns around them and don't seem to fit. Maybe it's better to consistently use drumrolls for these?
01:45:523 (355) - K would sound and fit better
01:49:925 (372) - A bit awkward to play, as this one note follows the vocals instead of the beat like the surrounding notes. It is a bit unexpected and might be better if you mapped this to the beat instead, even if it doesn't sound as good. 2 notes at 01:49:762 and 01:50:415 would fit well.
03:40:958 (780,781,782,783,784) - Still not sure about these... without the contrasting drumrolls they didn't feel as out of place as the previous ones though.
Overall it plays well but feels a bit monotone due to its length and reoccuring patterns. That however is due to the song itself and not bad mapping.
The mapping is mostly very consistent so I didn't want to interfere with your general structure too much as that would break more than it might improve.
Hope this was at least a bit helpful and sorry again for the delay.
Good luck!
Sorry for the late reply, I was really busy irl.
M4M from my queue
I feel like the SV could be a bit higher. Especially in the slower sections with 1.0 BPM multiplier it doesn't feel that comfortable. But then again I suck horribly at low BPM maps so this might just be me.
Heh. "funnypicturename.jpg" It's at 1365x768 resolution though which kinda bugs me, there was probably a small mistake while downscaling it. If you would switch that out with 1366x768 that would be awesome ^^
How about adding dons after the first 2 kats in the k k k k patterns at 00:01:502, 00:02:154, 00:06:719 and 00:07:371. This would be more interesting to play, add a little bit of variety and sound better imo
00:57:262 (171) - d to follow the pitch of the vocals
00:58:567 (176) - k would sound a bit better here
01:39:654 (320,321) - another drumroll instead? To follow how you previously mapped this sound
01:40:958 (325,326,327,328,329) - I am a bit unsure about these 1/8 patterns here. While alright to play they are a rather sharp contrast to the difficulty of the patterns around them and don't seem to fit. Maybe it's better to consistently use drumrolls for these?
01:45:523 (355) - K would sound and fit better
01:49:925 (372) - A bit awkward to play, as this one note follows the vocals instead of the beat like the surrounding notes. It is a bit unexpected and might be better if you mapped this to the beat instead, even if it doesn't sound as good. 2 notes at 01:49:762 and 01:50:415 would fit well.
03:40:958 (780,781,782,783,784) - Still not sure about these... without the contrasting drumrolls they didn't feel as out of place as the previous ones though.
Overall it plays well but feels a bit monotone due to its length and reoccuring patterns. That however is due to the song itself and not bad mapping.
The mapping is mostly very consistent so I didn't want to interfere with your general structure too much as that would break more than it might improve.
Hope this was at least a bit helpful and sorry again for the delay.
Good luck!