Thanks
forum
Inori Minase - Yume no Tsubomi
posted
Total Posts
64
y does evry1 have sht taste....
im gay Lol
nice diff name 
Hori hvick owo
need 12 sp tho
[Mada Mada Mada]
01:37:641 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - feels like this should be an increase in intensity (sv) instead of a decrease
01:47:056 - hmm i wouldn't have skipped this beat due to how prominent it is in the music
01:58:067 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - same as 01:37:641 (1,2,3,1,2,3)
02:25:833 (3) - based on how you patterned 02:25:513 (1,2), NC should be on this note instead of 02:25:992 (1)
02:59:503 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - found this pattern really hard to play due to the angle change required to land on 02:59:822 (5,6,1), perhaps you can make these curve to apply a more natural circular flow
03:33:971 (4) - due to rhythm change here a NC would be good
03:54:237 (1,2,3) - on sight read its really easy to mistaken 03:54:556 (2) as a slider and misaim 03:54:716 (3) due to how the overlap is setup, an easy fix is to make 03:54:237 (1) two circles
04:18:811 (1,2) - doesn't play very well with the music here, a more intuitive rhythm would be this http://puu.sh/yoqHH.jpg
04:59:412 (4,5) - pretty easy to misread here, a NC on the slider or enlarging the spacing would fix it nicely
05:01:197 (5,1) - this was really hard to play due to the drastic bpm change. Somehow spliting 05:01:197 (5) into 2 1/4 sliders helps a lot with this
[Mada Mada Mada]
01:37:641 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - feels like this should be an increase in intensity (sv) instead of a decrease
01:47:056 - hmm i wouldn't have skipped this beat due to how prominent it is in the music
01:58:067 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - same as 01:37:641 (1,2,3,1,2,3)
02:25:833 (3) - based on how you patterned 02:25:513 (1,2), NC should be on this note instead of 02:25:992 (1)
02:59:503 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - found this pattern really hard to play due to the angle change required to land on 02:59:822 (5,6,1), perhaps you can make these curve to apply a more natural circular flow
03:33:971 (4) - due to rhythm change here a NC would be good
03:54:237 (1,2,3) - on sight read its really easy to mistaken 03:54:556 (2) as a slider and misaim 03:54:716 (3) due to how the overlap is setup, an easy fix is to make 03:54:237 (1) two circles
04:18:811 (1,2) - doesn't play very well with the music here, a more intuitive rhythm would be this http://puu.sh/yoqHH.jpg
04:59:412 (4,5) - pretty easy to misread here, a NC on the slider or enlarging the spacing would fix it nicely
05:01:197 (5,1) - this was really hard to play due to the drastic bpm change. Somehow spliting 05:01:197 (5) into 2 1/4 sliders helps a lot with this
04:59:412 (4,5) - dont think the nc makes it better 2 play Tbh plus it make it look UGLIER ; / dont know how else u could read it aside for 1/2 anyway considering the stack leniency
01:37:641 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - I disagree cause the pitch decreases here, but I changed the placement a bit to reflect it more
regarding 01:47:056 - 04:18:811 (1,2) -, I hear what you mean, but I'd rather keep greater emphasis on what the 3/4s are mapped to since they're the peak of their respective melodies
I don't find the red ticks as noticeable, and they almost sound more like ties rather than definitive stand alone notes
everything else fixed (including hvick's parts)
regarding 01:47:056 - 04:18:811 (1,2) -, I hear what you mean, but I'd rather keep greater emphasis on what the 3/4s are mapped to since they're the peak of their respective melodies
I don't find the red ticks as noticeable, and they almost sound more like ties rather than definitive stand alone notes
everything else fixed (including hvick's parts)
01:06:365 - these straight sliders randomly break the curve spam you had going on with no change in the music
02:02:375 (1) - could lessen this curve a bit, looks like too much imo
03:04:450 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - dont see why these speed up when in every other case they slow down
04:01:418 - linear placement seems pretty out of place
04:15:939 (1,2,3) - improve blanket
00:46:577 (3,4) - why did you make the spacing so small here
03:33:971 - this section feels overly sharp
02:02:375 (1) - could lessen this curve a bit, looks like too much imo
03:04:450 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - dont see why these speed up when in every other case they slow down
04:01:418 - linear placement seems pretty out of place
04:15:939 (1,2,3) - improve blanket
00:46:577 (3,4) - why did you make the spacing so small here
03:33:971 - this section feels overly sharp
(´・◡・｀)
- 01:23:439 (3,1) - 04:00:779 (6) - fix stack pls
- 01:14:982 (1) - add finish here maybe? 02:36:684 (1) - here too
- 04:35:567 (4,1) - this spacing is kinda weak for such a strong note
- 04:54:729 (1) - pretty sure this is missing a snare
- 01:16:896 (1,1,1) - you have whistles here but not 02:38:599 (1,1,1) - here?
- 01:26:630 (1,2,3) - a wide angle feels awkward for the peak of this section
nishana
00:46:577 (3,4) - i made the spacing small here for the calm piano notes
dymond
01:14:982 (1) - 02:36:684 (1) - ehh if I add them here I'll have 3 in a row, don't wanna overuse them or they lose value
fixed everything else and for hvick/vinxis too
00:46:577 (3,4) - i made the spacing small here for the calm piano notes
dymond
01:14:982 (1) - 02:36:684 (1) - ehh if I add them here I'll have 3 in a row, don't wanna overuse them or they lose value
fixed everything else and for hvick/vinxis too
hvick logged in for this
yo
[general]
[general]
- explain.
- 00:21:688 - 00:22:963 - 00:23:602 - unsnapped green lines, you should probably fix that
- 02:38:599 (1,1,1) - different svs from 01:16:896 (1,1,1) - ? right now 02:38:918 (1) - 02:39:237 (1) - are both using 0.8x sv when the first 01:17:216 (1) - 01:17:535 (1) - has 0.9x -> 0.8x SV drop
- why do people like putting so many breaks during bookmark parts it just bloats the file size lol
- 05:01:581 (1,2,3) - could make this an equilateral triangle for aesthetics
wait was that a fresh download cause i didnt have an extra mp3
???
Edit: oh they changed mp3 name cause omar is unrankable, maybe i was the one that should have redownloaded xD
???
Edit: oh they changed mp3 name cause omar is unrankable, maybe i was the one that should have redownloaded xD
yeah i literally did a double take and redownloaded the map just to make sure i wasn't seeing things LMFAOjonathanlfj wrote:
wait was that a fresh download cause i didnt have an extra mp3
???
Edit: oh they changed mp3 name cause omar is unrankable, maybe i was the one that should have redownloaded xD
mishima yurara in tags tho
Topic Starter
addedbbj0920 wrote:
mishima yurara in tags tho
omg fix kiai
omg
Sinnoh wrote:
omg
LowAccuracySS wrote:
Sinnoh wrote:
omg
Please revive your Dori Dori set
best bubble pop ever hoyl
SnowWhite
Lavender wrote:
omar is a shithead
Lavender wrote:
omar is a shithead
Zhan
blah
fix metadata
fix metadata
ohc.gg
アニメマシテ for source and Inori Minase instead for the romanized artist
wtf , after bath and DQ xd..
minori inase
00:06:364 - zhan
00:34:450 - Nathan "sukiNathan" Tran
00:54:875 - prolapse
01:15:301 - zhan
01:27:907 - Nathan "sukiNathan" Tran
01:48:333 - prolapse
02:08:918 - zhan
02:37:003 - Nathan "sukiNathan" Tran
02:49:609 - prolapse
03:10:035 - zhan
03:30:620 - Nathan "sukiNathan" Tran
03:51:045 - prolapse
03:59:822 - zhan
04:20:247 - Nathan "sukiNathan" Tran
04:40:833 - prolapse
metadata source btw
zg
大人