[Advanced]
* Only the name is Advanced. It's a regular Hard on 160bpm, so AR7 fits much better.
* 00:44:335 (1,1) - Very weird stack because stacks are supposed to go right-down side and this one just breaks it lol
* 01:16:397 - There is a syllable so ignoring this entirely doesn't make sense to me?
[Mk's Hard]
* 01:03:366 (2) - 01:15:366 (2) - Kinda unexpected triplet, there's no sound like that so what does this represent? Using 1/4s on clear 1/4 beats is already more than enough for a Hard diff lol
* 01:17:897 (7,1) - is emphasized through larger spacings but 01:05:897 (4,1) - is not, seems inconsistent
* 01:01:772 - 01:02:522 - 01:12:272 - 01:18:272 - Ignoring such beats seems too underwhelming considering how much you emphasized 01:06:085 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - these vocals. There's no reason for them to have so much difference in intensity while they're really similar vocals.
[Kalibe's Insane]
* 00:37:210 (5) - This is really a weird rhythm for me because no matter what I focus on, all the sounds on 00:37:397 - is stronger than 00:37:210 - . This rhythm is a bit special, yet you still used a regular white tick beat.
* 00:41:147 (3,4,5,6,7) - Why is this a stream? Its drum sound is totally different from 00:38:335 (1,2,3,4,5) -
* 01:05:897 (5,6,1) - Combo set is a bit weird because 6 is an unrelated sound to 01:04:960 (1,2,3,4) - . So rather use a pattern with 01:05:897 (1) - being NC'd, to keep it consistent with 01:00:085 (1,2) - 01:03:085 (1,2) -
* 01:12:085 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4) - This ruins the pattern consistency which you did before. In previous ones you started with 2 distinct notes and started 01:12:085 (1,2,1,2) - this kind of pattern when the vocal starts to repeat a certain word. But in this case it starts before the repeating word and ends before the repeating ends, which should be 01:13:772 - .
* 01:18:085 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - This as well. 01:18:085 (1) - and 01:18:460 (2,3) - have no direct relation to each other but has a independent pattern as a whole, while 01:19:210 (1,2,3,4) - they're also similar sounds too.
* 01:22:585 (1,2) - I think this rhythm should be reversed. As you did all the way you have emphasized the vocals and with this pattern it suddenly loses the emphasis on 01:22:772 - and emphasizes 01:22:960 (2) - this drumbeat by a jump out of nowhere, which I think doesn't really make sense.
[FCL's Another]
* 01:09:272 (2,3,4) - Imo 3 should be stacked under 2 instead, because the overall pattern is following the vocals, you don't need to space out 01:09:460 (3) - this drum-only beat, and would be better to emphasize 01:09:647 (4) - by putting a jump there. Just like you did 01:22:585 (1,2,3) - here.
[Relation]
This diff is problematic for me. I don't honestly care whether this is for meme or not, but this CS is used to just justify all the screen-crossing jumps on the kiai. I'm not complaining it being too large, but really, the jumps don't work well with the whole map's structure.
This song is generally very smooth and therefore the 'strong points' and 'weak points' aren't too much different. Your map, on the other hand, exceedingly differentiates strong and weak notes, and they're not even used consistently. Starting with the insanely slow sliders, they require almost no action. So the slider body/ends have very little to no effect, but it is still used on kind-of-important sounds like 00:52:585 (1) - 00:55:210 - 01:01:960 (1) - 01:03:272 - 01:06:272 - 01:07:960 (1) - and so on, while just-a-little-stronger sounds like 01:00:085 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - are used as full screen jumps. You may have done this to emphasize certain sounds, but this went over just 'emphasizing'. It only represents some sounds and kills everything else.
Also even though things like 01:00:085 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - are worth emphasizing, their actual intensity isn't too much different than the rest of the map/kiai, especially comparing to 01:03:460 (1,2,3,4) - 01:06:460 (1,2,3,4) - -like things, they're mostly the same; the only difference is that they don't have a consonant on the second syllable so it sounds a bit weaker, not the difference between a mountain and the land.
So consider taking care of these, and good luck!
* Only the name is Advanced. It's a regular Hard on 160bpm, so AR7 fits much better.
* 00:44:335 (1,1) - Very weird stack because stacks are supposed to go right-down side and this one just breaks it lol
* 01:16:397 - There is a syllable so ignoring this entirely doesn't make sense to me?
[Mk's Hard]
* 01:03:366 (2) - 01:15:366 (2) - Kinda unexpected triplet, there's no sound like that so what does this represent? Using 1/4s on clear 1/4 beats is already more than enough for a Hard diff lol
* 01:17:897 (7,1) - is emphasized through larger spacings but 01:05:897 (4,1) - is not, seems inconsistent
* 01:01:772 - 01:02:522 - 01:12:272 - 01:18:272 - Ignoring such beats seems too underwhelming considering how much you emphasized 01:06:085 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - these vocals. There's no reason for them to have so much difference in intensity while they're really similar vocals.
[Kalibe's Insane]
* 00:37:210 (5) - This is really a weird rhythm for me because no matter what I focus on, all the sounds on 00:37:397 - is stronger than 00:37:210 - . This rhythm is a bit special, yet you still used a regular white tick beat.
* 00:41:147 (3,4,5,6,7) - Why is this a stream? Its drum sound is totally different from 00:38:335 (1,2,3,4,5) -
* 01:05:897 (5,6,1) - Combo set is a bit weird because 6 is an unrelated sound to 01:04:960 (1,2,3,4) - . So rather use a pattern with 01:05:897 (1) - being NC'd, to keep it consistent with 01:00:085 (1,2) - 01:03:085 (1,2) -
* 01:12:085 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4) - This ruins the pattern consistency which you did before. In previous ones you started with 2 distinct notes and started 01:12:085 (1,2,1,2) - this kind of pattern when the vocal starts to repeat a certain word. But in this case it starts before the repeating word and ends before the repeating ends, which should be 01:13:772 - .
* 01:18:085 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - This as well. 01:18:085 (1) - and 01:18:460 (2,3) - have no direct relation to each other but has a independent pattern as a whole, while 01:19:210 (1,2,3,4) - they're also similar sounds too.
* 01:22:585 (1,2) - I think this rhythm should be reversed. As you did all the way you have emphasized the vocals and with this pattern it suddenly loses the emphasis on 01:22:772 - and emphasizes 01:22:960 (2) - this drumbeat by a jump out of nowhere, which I think doesn't really make sense.
[FCL's Another]
* 01:09:272 (2,3,4) - Imo 3 should be stacked under 2 instead, because the overall pattern is following the vocals, you don't need to space out 01:09:460 (3) - this drum-only beat, and would be better to emphasize 01:09:647 (4) - by putting a jump there. Just like you did 01:22:585 (1,2,3) - here.
[Relation]
This diff is problematic for me. I don't honestly care whether this is for meme or not, but this CS is used to just justify all the screen-crossing jumps on the kiai. I'm not complaining it being too large, but really, the jumps don't work well with the whole map's structure.
This song is generally very smooth and therefore the 'strong points' and 'weak points' aren't too much different. Your map, on the other hand, exceedingly differentiates strong and weak notes, and they're not even used consistently. Starting with the insanely slow sliders, they require almost no action. So the slider body/ends have very little to no effect, but it is still used on kind-of-important sounds like 00:52:585 (1) - 00:55:210 - 01:01:960 (1) - 01:03:272 - 01:06:272 - 01:07:960 (1) - and so on, while just-a-little-stronger sounds like 01:00:085 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - are used as full screen jumps. You may have done this to emphasize certain sounds, but this went over just 'emphasizing'. It only represents some sounds and kills everything else.
Also even though things like 01:00:085 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - are worth emphasizing, their actual intensity isn't too much different than the rest of the map/kiai, especially comparing to 01:03:460 (1,2,3,4) - 01:06:460 (1,2,3,4) - -like things, they're mostly the same; the only difference is that they don't have a consonant on the second syllable so it sounds a bit weaker, not the difference between a mountain and the land.
So consider taking care of these, and good luck!