How about we unrank halftime?
That works tooLuigiHann wrote:
How about we just unrank Kai?
Upon which you're above all the half time abusers. Your point?Rolled wrote:
However HT would still affect the biggest score board of them all.
Are there really that many beatmaps that are so hard that you can't get into the top 5 without HT? It seems like the number of them would be a small fraction compared to the overall total number of beatmaps, and wouldn't make THAT big of a difference in the grand scheme of things.Rolled wrote:
However HT would still affect the biggest score board of them all.
Think about how contractions work. It's short for "You all."mtmcl wrote:
Note I voted for nerfing so fuck all ya'll. (is it ya'll or y'all?)
Screw all y'all.awp wrote:
Some people say "All you all" though.
Reikin
Half TimeThis is news how?
I suppose I did not make it clear. I just discovered it.lukewarmholiday wrote:
ReikinHalf TimeThis is news how?
Cyclone wrote:
[14:28] <peppy> .3 and all scores deleted
[14:28] <peppy> post on my behalf
Next public release = nerf to halftime.
I thought about doing this a long time ago.Zerostarry wrote:
Cyclone wrote:
[14:28] <peppy> .3 and all scores deleted
[14:28] <peppy> post on my behalf
Next public release = nerf to halftime.
Osht, everyone halftime WIW to get your score deleted (and your accuracy back)
[00:14] <Cyclone|IRC> if a person loses the only score they have a 2000+ combo onjmaeshawn wrote:
If all HT scores are going to be deleted then does that mean that any achievement accomplished with halftime will have to be redone?
That would suck because that's the only thing I ever used halftime for, and then it get killed.
Rolled wrote:
/me dances
Saturos wrote:
Rolled wrote:
/me dances
You're telling me, I went down 29.YoshiKart wrote:
I went down 16 ranks in a sitting. X_X
I lost 38mil lolCard N'FoRcE wrote:
Ah well, i lost 9 milions.
I thought i'd have lost even more.
Time to get rid of half-timed records
I would think Easy would do better unless you're missing a complete circle.nomedeusuarionaodisp wrote:
I prefer using No Fail