Gaia wrote:

and for the record the tv size for serment should be in brackets too js

Okorin wrote:

[flame haze]
did you forget hitsounds on 00:18:609 (4,5,6) - and 00:27:087 (5) - 00:27:576 (1) - why do these have whistles on their bodies uhh whoops.messed up here when i edit this part after hitsounding.

i assume the entire map looking unpolished and a bit unorganized is your kind of thing so i won't comment on that aspect unless you want to improve it
not quite sure what you mean here, if you mean the fact that everything overlaps and the visual spacing isnt all identical that's on purpose.
if you meant something else please elaborate.

01:29:044 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6) - vs 01:34:261 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - might just be me but the parts with vocals and drums have more things going on than the parts where it's just drums and vocals are long and held so why are the sections with less going on the harder patterns and hitsounded additively, it would make more sense to me the other way around
this part is interesting to talk about. i dont want to sound like i'm totally bs-ing stuff but basically i don't think back and forth jumps are actually that difficult, like yea the spacing is high but everyone knows that they're significantly easier than most other types of jumps. taking that into consideration, we can also see that the note density is significantly lower in this part (it's all 1/2 spam, but the vocal part has triples, different slider stuff,
etc.) aside from that, the 1-2 jumps are on a guitar thing that stood out a lot to me while mapping, and to me it seems like the vocals are at their climax;
the fact that the note is held out means more exciting stuff should happen imo, rather than something like a 8/1 slider (obviously an exaggeration). hopefully this explanation makes sense, but i'm willing to nerf it if it's still too much of a "diff spike".

00:49:750 (6,1,2) - feels like a pretty odd way to connect two patterns yousually go for back forth movement but this is one of the very few instances where you go for linear movement and i think you should of have stuck to back forths hmm. i disagree, i use fairly similar movements in otheer places too. for example, 00:26:272 (6,1,2) - , which is actually on the exact same phrase in the chorus, or 00:54:805 (5,6,1) - which is somewhat right-angle-esque. aside from that, the spacing is quite low for most of these any way - the uncomfortable (i guess) movement created by a linear angle isn't as pronounced.

also your whistle sample is mildly annoying since it doesnt really fit any instrument in particular in the song idk the point was to be additive,
i think it sounds fine...+ there's two on 00:15:348 (3,4) - admittedly the one on 00:15:348 (3) - is a mistake, but generally the whistles are supposed to follow the main guitar line that i was mapping to. and i dont understand what's happening or why