I thought you're making a full spread, nice job mazz!
you dont need to be so passive agressive to someone trying to help[Nemesis] wrote:
a post whining about the similar styles, or an actual mod fixing some of the issues that the map has?GoldenWolf wrote:
I am making a post, just wait a bit.
The webiste doesn't include drain time of the last object. Im guessing you know this applies to spinners but it also applies to sliders as wellF1r3tar wrote:
bro
Just because a sound exists doesn't mean you have to map it. It's all about whether it's appropriate and fitting with the overall rhythm (which is why you have skipped sounds in lower diffs). Having said this I didn't actually look at your individual points but still felt the need to point this out, because you know, reasonsfrukoyurdakul wrote:
Hello, I'd like to say some things about this map's timing and some structure. Since I'm not a STD mapper I can't know the STD mapping structure but I can still hear the sounds
It's actually audible. You can clearly hear a buzzing sound from the soft hitsound set.Yuii- wrote:
2) 04:18:179 - 10% volume means there's no feedback. And no feedback is no good. Is actually so "not good" that is not allowed by the RC, so you might wanna bump that volume all the way up to, at least, 35%~ volume.
Good idea, I'll rework a couple of unnecessarily controversial patterns and I believe it's good to go again.Kurai wrote:
It's actually audible. You can clearly hear a buzzing sound from the soft hitsound set.Yuii- wrote:
2) 04:18:179 - 10% volume means there's no feedback. And no feedback is no good. Is actually so "not good" that is not allowed by the RC, so you might wanna bump that volume all the way up to, at least, 35%~ volume.
Popping this for now until issues are solved.
Disagree if your argument is only the music not being properly audible.Zeptaxis wrote:
Stream starting at 04:18:179 (1) - seems very overmapped and unfitting for the background noise, considering it's not properly audible even at 25% speed
- 04:20:845 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - This massive deathstream in such a quiet part I feel doesn't reflect the song's intensity very well especially when you mapped pretty much the same sounds with repeat sliders just before at 04:18:179 (1,1) - and the guitar even gets slightly louder at 04:23:512 (1,1) - but repeats are used instead of actual streams. Ideally there should be a consistency in intensity but there is only super easy and super hard.GranDSenpai wrote:
03:57:957 (1,2,3,4,5) - 1/3 instead of 1/4 pls
Have you ever seen the map in editor ?! Some parts are extremley similar, especially the end streamsArtorias wrote:
Most mappers basically got started "Copy pasting" the style of other mappers, and because someone does something similar it and it's on the same song, the map is un-rankable? Lord almighty.
Trying to deliberately change your map so its not similar to another map is insane to me, there can exist two maps that are similar, and there's no problem with it. It's not stealing.
Artorias wrote:
Most mappers basically got started "Copy pasting" the style of other mappers, and because someone does something similar it and it's on the same song, the map is un-rankable? Lord almighty.
Trying to deliberately change your map so its not similar to another map is insane to me, there can exist two maps that are similar, and there's no problem with it. It's not stealing.
Do you people not even read the BNG rules when you get added? Did you just assume you can nominate anything? You're 60k dude and a brand new BN, why do you think you can judge this?Kurai wrote:
I'm pretty satisfied witht he structure of the map as it is and I don't really mind bubbling it. I know this map is rather controversial conidering its difficulty, but as long as there is an audience, I don't see anything wrong with nominating it.
This map is two songs merged in one, hence the / seperation. I don't see anything wrong with the merge as it is done correctly and the two songs are rather similar.
Metadata: https://uniqueleader.com/new-releases/r ... gal-ki-en/ ← Rings of Saturns' record label.
aaaaaa
There's a reason we have tiered BNXexxar wrote:
Do you people not even read the BNG rules when you get added? Did you just assume you can nominate anything? You're 60k dude and a brand new BN, why do you think you can judge this?Kurai wrote:
I'm pretty satisfied witht he structure of the map as it is and I don't really mind bubbling it. I know this map is rather controversial conidering its difficulty, but as long as there is an audience, I don't see anything wrong with nominating it.
This map is two songs merged in one, hence the / seperation. I don't see anything wrong with the merge as it is done correctly and the two songs are rather similar.
Metadata: https://uniqueleader.com/new-releases/r ... gal-ki-en/ ← Rings of Saturns' record label.
aaaaaa
I think you should be kicked from the BNG for your actions here.
Sigh.Artorias wrote:
Most mappers basically got started "Copy pasting" the style of other mappers, and because someone does something similar it and it's on the same song, the map is un-rankable? Lord almighty.
Trying to deliberately change your map so its not similar to another map is insane to me, there can exist two maps that are similar, and there's no problem with it. It's not stealing.
Well no good modder seems to be giving a fuck about my maps at all, how are you expecting me to get quality mods?Shiirn wrote:
Positive criticism is nice and all, but sometimes people have to accept that there are times where there is nothing positive to say.
A map created by an inexperienced mapper, bubbled by an inexperienced mapper, on page two with no significant mods or player input (Yes, I am handily discarding every single post because they're all useless), that copies anything worth mimicking from another mapper, while doing it badly and doing the not-"inspired"-bits even worse, is disgusting. This isn't even worthy of being called a farce.