a quick little mod because i really want to see this map ranked
amazing map, dude. cant wait to see it be your second ranked
feel free to deny
[Reverberation]
00:03:873 (1) - maybe no NC here? seems kinda pointless
00:20:236 (3,3) - possibly NC these, for consistency (these types of repeat sliders were their own combos)
00:25:691 (6) - perhaps map this as a triple, leave the other repeat be
00:27:327 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - hmm, i think this grid needs some work. maybe tweaking the ratios a little?
00:36:055 - i really like this stream
00:39:327 (1,2,3,4) - this is a nice idea but its a little much, maybe inch it a bit closer to the slider
00:48:055 (1) - a bit of a sharp turn. if you really cant make it look any fatter, disregard
00:52:964 (4,5,6,7,8) - this is a pretty big snap...
01:37:827 (7) - overmapped?
01:47:781 (4) - this spacing is pretty inconsistent, its kinda contradictory with the hype you were building with the previous sliders
01:52:282 (5) - ctrl+g for flow?
02:13:009 (5,1) - looks like 1/4th spacing imo
03:04:964 (2,3) - should be a pair of jumps aswell, feels undermapped
03:44:373 - undermapped a red tick here, i feel as though it can be mapped
04:03:327 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - i like
04:21:327 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - this feels like it escalates really quickly, should be more gradual, dunno
04:21:941 (1) - have this end on the red tick? its just uncool to have a circle that quickly at such a bpm
04:49:146 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - feels kinda boring, inconsistent with the other jumps
05:10:964 (1,2) - these are both different sliders, copy paste instead
05:13:691 (9) - really fast, looks weird since stream was low spacing
05:27:055 (9) - ^
06:00:873 (1) - pointless NC? i can see the thought behind it though
06:41:327 (6) - would look better imo if you ctrl+g and ctrl+h it, but keep in the same place
08:01:895 (8) - really difficult to read, but i guess that doesnt matter because its a slider
08:04:894 (1,2) - switch NC, remove it on the last note?
00:03:873 (1) - maybe no NC here? seems kinda pointless
00:20:236 (3,3) - possibly NC these, for consistency (these types of repeat sliders were their own combos)
00:25:691 (6) - perhaps map this as a triple, leave the other repeat be
00:27:327 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - hmm, i think this grid needs some work. maybe tweaking the ratios a little?
00:36:055 - i really like this stream
00:39:327 (1,2,3,4) - this is a nice idea but its a little much, maybe inch it a bit closer to the slider
00:48:055 (1) - a bit of a sharp turn. if you really cant make it look any fatter, disregard
00:52:964 (4,5,6,7,8) - this is a pretty big snap...
01:37:827 (7) - overmapped?
01:47:781 (4) - this spacing is pretty inconsistent, its kinda contradictory with the hype you were building with the previous sliders
01:52:282 (5) - ctrl+g for flow?
02:13:009 (5,1) - looks like 1/4th spacing imo
03:04:964 (2,3) - should be a pair of jumps aswell, feels undermapped
03:44:373 - undermapped a red tick here, i feel as though it can be mapped
04:03:327 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - i like
04:21:327 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - this feels like it escalates really quickly, should be more gradual, dunno
04:21:941 (1) - have this end on the red tick? its just uncool to have a circle that quickly at such a bpm
04:49:146 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - feels kinda boring, inconsistent with the other jumps
05:10:964 (1,2) - these are both different sliders, copy paste instead
05:13:691 (9) - really fast, looks weird since stream was low spacing
05:27:055 (9) - ^
06:00:873 (1) - pointless NC? i can see the thought behind it though
06:41:327 (6) - would look better imo if you ctrl+g and ctrl+h it, but keep in the same place
08:01:895 (8) - really difficult to read, but i guess that doesnt matter because its a slider
08:04:894 (1,2) - switch NC, remove it on the last note?
amazing map, dude. cant wait to see it be your second ranked