The example I gave wasn't disqualified because that format isn't related to the song but because it looked silly. I see no difference here.
Fixing the tags without disqualifying the beatmap would make them dissapear online, but the beatmap could still be looked by the old tags in-game. It shall only used as a last resort if the beatmap gets ranked. Disqualifying is a much secure way to avoid breaking stuff and it's prefered nowadays to fix tags and similar issues. It also lets other people post their opinion regarding other possible issues your beatmap could have (like the concerns raised about the difficulty name), which is what the Qualified section is for.Nofool wrote:
About the tags this is a matter that can be fixed without disqualifying the map, why was this disqualified? I would be very ashamed to abuse of my power as much as you do, you alone are being a huge drawback for this game and this is very worrysome.
Okay, it's enough already to behave like an edgelord. You know very surely that it's just some bad memeing you want to practice because of the lulz and we understand that you and some other people find it funny but things like this makes the whole mapping and the mapping process to a joke and it shouldn't turn further to that than it sadly happened to be. It's okay to be sceptical but at a point it's just ridiculous.Nofool wrote:
About the tags this is a matter that can be fixed without disqualifying the map, why was this disqualified? I would be very ashamed to abuse of my power as much as you do, you alone are being a huge drawback for this game and this is very worrysome.
So I explained very very well why I wanted to keep the difficulty name "T A T S U J I N" at first but after all I admitted that it was purely for the sake of cheap memeing which isn't necessary here and abandoned that idea. I did very well read your explaination and I repoint to my previous post above renaming the difficulty to "B-R-A-I-N P-O-W-E-R" because that's what your explaination says. But you know it better, don't you? I have been asked (like you right now) to change the difficulty, I wasn't forced at any time. But turning the words like you want them to be is the easier way. And I am very certain that anyone here has more experience in the gamemode and in osu! in general than you, mapping good doesn't mean to know a lot.Nofool wrote:
About the "Stefan's point" it seems you guys did only read a small part of my explanations, i am not trying to copy the style of the lyrics, this is just one of the sources of inspiration i used for this difficulty name. If Stefan is not able to defend his opinion and instead would do anything you say just like a puppet, know that this is not everyone's case. The "silly" argument is as subjetive as you having any sort of knowledge in this gamemode.
No need to get upset here, it was legitimately trolling and you know they're garbage. Aside of that, I doubt you urgently have to add tags. The only thing I've heard is about NOMA not being in contract with konami anymore and the song isn't available on any game. But that needs to be confirmed first, at all.Nofool wrote:
Tags removed now that the map was disqualified anyway but this is a really bad behaviour from you right there. (I wont add any other tags without actual proofs)
I guess it was dq'd because diffname, tags keks rip memes.Stefan wrote:
Then it should be B-R-A-I-N P-O-W-E-R.
*shrugs*
OnosakiHito wrote:
What's up with the mod fromzigizigiefe? No one wants to response?
Nardoxyribonucleic wrote:
You may post a log of that here so we could know your response towards the mod.
Oops, I forgot to share logs. Now I see no problem to get disqualified. We have discussed with Nofool, then I have decided to it is the right way what he followed.Nofool wrote:
i did not save the log
2017-07-06 23:50 zigizigiefe: dad i've shared my concerns about brain power,can you reply these .w. https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/6113316
2017-07-06 23:53 Nofool: if it's not actual disqualification request + suggestions i dont actualy need to reply
2017-07-06 23:54 zigizigiefe: not exactly. as i said, just concerns
2017-07-06 23:54 zigizigiefe: let me know tho
2017-07-06 23:54 Nofool: "readabilty issu" is subjective and i see none else complaining (those are way to simple to even be considered imo)
2017-07-06 23:54 Nofool: about patterns i thought it was obvious enough that im just creating variety...
2017-07-06 23:55 Nofool: else i would just use the same pattern all over the song
2017-07-06 23:55 zigizigiefe: i'm aware of it
2017-07-06 23:55 Nofool: same goes for kiais they are different
2017-07-06 23:55 zigizigiefe: i also know that first part is too repetitive
2017-07-06 23:55 zigizigiefe: 01:35:277 - i didn't get this red line btw
2017-07-06 23:55 Nofool: i did not put any redline it's all taken from the ranked std ver
2017-07-06 23:56 Nofool: i wont contest their timing as this is kinda accurate, i know its not quite that good but theres been post about it on their thread
2017-07-06 23:57 zigizigiefe: 00:52:999 - sudden density drop seems weird
2017-07-06 23:57 zigizigiefe: when song goes with same density
2017-07-06 23:57 Nofool: about finisher/density and all, this is just for variety's sake, those are different ways i could map the song but im mixing them up on purpose
2017-07-06 23:59 Nofool: there are also part with mroe density yet you did not mention them
2017-07-06 23:59 zigizigiefe: probably i already know it but didn't point out to not write too much
2017-07-07 00:00 Nofool: if you believe the map should be disqualified/refined just write it clearly on the thread then you will see if others agree
2017-07-07 00:00 zigizigiefe: i don't complain about anything
2017-07-07 00:01 zigizigiefe: the map is well made and pretty fun
2017-07-07 00:01 Nofool: im not saying the map is mapped the right way/corretly, just trying to rank it the way it is right now
2017-07-07 00:01 zigizigiefe: these were just questions and concerns, that's it
2017-07-07 00:01 zigizigiefe: if you reject all, it would not be a problem for me at all
2017-07-07 00:02 Nofool: there was no actual changes suggestion (unless the last point i believe) so im not even rejecting
2017-07-07 00:03 Nofool: the sound's snapping is impossible to really follow and to me it kinda sounds like it's accelereing so i used 1/4 1/6 1/8 to kind of represent that
2017-07-07 00:03 Nofool: accelerating*
2017-07-07 00:04 zigizigiefe: to be honest people barely get that there is a pattern made with 1/4+1/6+1/8,whether there's sv change or not
2017-07-07 00:05 zigizigiefe: but it's really impossible to represent here
2017-07-07 00:05 zigizigiefe: so you followed right way here
yes, like this post by me.-Valony- wrote:
this is a mistake, i didnt know we couldn't delete post