- Frontier - wrote:

01:48:227 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) -

1. 00:26:627 - 00:33:027 - its better to have that Held sound to be executed on slider tail like 00:28:227 - smthng like this , idk just do something to make it like that because it feels empty afff. Prolly could add repeat for 00:25:827 (1) - and move 00:27:427 (2) - to 00:28:227 - and delete its repeat . same for second one
2. 00:45:027 (1,2,3) - Nice linear :joy: :gun:
3. 01:23:427 (1,2) - Cant you like do something like 01:23:427 (1,2,3,4) - so that all the stuff in song at 01:25:877 - will be not supported by slider tail atleast
4. 01:29:827 (1,2,3,4) - ya same
5. 01:41:877 - 01:48:277 - - _ -
   tbh this diff is really useless. really

1. 00:18:727 - Why do u always skip strong sounds like srsly
2. 00:21:027 (1) - RemoVE NC
3. 00:37:027 (3,1) - Stack j
4. 00:51:427 (1) - Cute Xd
5. 01:26:927 (1) - REMOve nc
6. 01:31:427 (1) - Same , for consistency
7. 01:48:227 (3) - pls a slider till 01:48:227 (3) -

1. 00:35:227 - Circle for consistency with 00:28:827 (4) -
2. 00:37:027 (1) - 00:30:627 (3) - Consistent nc pls ty
3. 00:50:727 (1) - This is mayb 3 short for newbies. also since u did circl here in easy , having spiner here is bad for spread amirite
4. 01:41:827 - SLIDER pls . This feels 3 empty
5. 01:48:227 (5) - Tbh sound ends on 01:48:577 - so slider end feels overmapped af

DeRandom Otaku wrote:

[Beginner]

1. 00:26:627 - 00:33:027 - its better to have that Held sound to be executed on slider tail like 00:28:227 - smthng like this , idk just do something to make it like that because it feels empty afff. Prolly could add repeat for 00:25:827 (1) - and move 00:27:427 (2) - to 00:28:227 - and delete its repeat . same for second one idk i want to emphasize the 2nd one more than the first so i make the slider support the 2nd one instead, might change if more ppl points this out
2. 00:45:027 (1,2,3) - Nice linear :joy: :gun: k should be better now
3. 01:23:427 (1,2) - Cant you like do something like 01:23:427 (1,2,3,4) - so that all the stuff in song at 01:25:877 - will be not supported by slider tail atleast idk wtf r u saying but i think it sfine
4. 01:29:827 (1,2,3,4) - ya same
5. 01:41:877 - 01:48:277 - - _ - flow wont affect much if the map is this slow tbh but changed 1st shape to a normal s anyway
   tbh this diff is really useless. really i agree i just wanted to have 0 - 8 spread maybe 9 too idk if not lazy then yes

[Easy]

1. 00:18:727 - Why do u always skip strong sounds like srsly cuz its d i f f e r e n t s o u n d from wat i mapped before and this way it can seperates those sounds just fine
2. 00:21:027 (1) - RemoVE NC yes
3. 00:37:027 (3,1) - Stack j yes
4. 00:51:427 (1) - Cute Xd thank
5. 01:26:927 (1) - REMOve nc yes
6. 01:31:427 (1) - Same , for consistency k
7. 01:48:227 (3) - pls a slider till 01:48:227 (3) -

wat no
[Normal]

1. 00:35:227 - Circle for consistency with 00:28:827 (4) - k
2. 00:37:027 (1) - 00:30:627 (3) - Consistent nc pls ty this skin fucks with my nc usage rly fixed
3. 00:50:727 (1) - This is mayb 3 short for newbies. also since u did circl here in easy , having spiner here is bad for spread amirite ur wrong
4. 01:41:827 - SLIDER pls . This feels 3 empty no
5. 01:48:227 (5) - Tbh sound ends on 01:48:577 - so slider end feels overmapped af na i just map white on that part in every diff cuz there IS a sound there even tho is a lot weaker

400th kd thanks

1. Tbh the volumes are earblasting lol, try asking others for opinions I guess
2. 00:37:827 (11,1) - Why this is left empty when the rhythm is still ongoing lol
3. 00:50:627 (1,2,3,4,1) - Using constant 1/2 rhythms would make a better transition to that calm section with constant 1/1 thing imo.
4. 01:40:227 (3,4,5) - 01:40:927 (1,2) - The way these 1/2 rhythms are used differently is really confusing.

Electoz wrote:

[My Angel Deppyforce]

1. Tbh the volumes are earblasting lol, try asking others for opinions I guess i_didnt_even_do_any_hitsound_yet
2. 00:37:827 (11,1) - Why this is left empty when the rhythm is still ongoing lol added 3/2 slider to follow the thing, i thought this would be a nice little break point but i guess N O M E R C Y
3. 00:50:627 (1,2,3,4,1) - Using constant 1/2 rhythms would make a better transition to that calm section with constant 1/1 thing imo. na i think dat doesnt fit
   if 1/2 circles -> would be a bit too intense
   if 1/2 sliders -> it wont play as different as next part, it would be a bit boring (it already is boring in the next part) and the slow part wont stand out as much
4. 01:40:227 (3,4,5) - 01:40:927 (1,2) - The way these 1/2 rhythms are used differently is really confusing. ee not really if youre a 8*player i mean i can read it just fine bcuz ar10

That's it I guess don't expect me to find much on a 8* map lo
gl~

ncuh wrote:

M4M
===
MyAngelPeppyForce
Can't say anything there. Looks good, to much overlaps, but they are ok i guess.
00:37:527 (8,9,10) - need same distance there na its fine
00:37:827 (1) - dunno about that slider, looks bad imo
and maybe this will be following music(music?hahaarpavrararararavnra) better na its fine
00:39:827 (7,8,9,10,11) - i think there need some disgustin slider like this or worst wtf no
I hear smth between it 00:43:627 (2,3) - dunno what to say, but when playing it's hearing ya theres a sound/ added note
00:44:527 (6,7,8,9) - smth wrong there too. There is strange sounds, need to change smth there(idk what exactly) na this is fine cuz still following a thing in the song
00:45:327 (4,5,6) - same and few times more
01:40:227 (3,4,5) - move it down away a little bit, same 01:40:627 (6) - intentionally wanted it to be a proper straight line with constant ds
01:41:227 (3,4,5) - same
===
Another - delete it no
===
Insane
00:16:227 (1,2) - there should be more distance +0.2 ds
00:39:227 (3,4) - dunno why but this moment playing rly uncomfortable nah its fine rly
Overall - sometimes u using "x" sound, sometimes u not using "x" sound, but using "y" sound. That's weird. I'm not sure about 5* or less maps for this song. Atleast use the same sounds and use them at same patterns. For exemple 00:46:827 (1) - 2 tipes of sound on that slider(that's already rly bad) and u mapped it before differently na its fine players suck and dont have time to react to those properly so have to keep some playability here

Deppyforce wrote:

if u know how to hitsound properly, pls do hitsound on this for me. i owe u a mod or 2 later

1. 00:32:027 (1,2,3,4) - why not use 1/8
2. 00:36:327 (2,7) - maybe just stack would look better
3. 00:50:027 (4) - i would suggest dividing this into two and then add a circle at the end like this http://puu.sh/vB91k/69fa8a361b.jpg cuz it sounds like another one at the white tick 00:50:227 - and there should be clickable for the strong sound at 00:50:427 - i guess the circle at the end is optional but definitely try splitting that into 2
4. 01:12:227 (8) - missing NC
5. 01:14:127 (1) - and unnecessary NC here
6. 01:18:627 (1,1) - wat lol this probably isnt a good idea, maybe http://puu.sh/vB8PW/70507359a0.jpg or http://puu.sh/vB8QD/c5d348a26b.jpg
7. 01:35:427 (1) - 01:36:827 (4) - check stacking
8. 01:48:627 (1) - you can delete this cuz theres no sound at the white

eeezzzeee wrote:

hi
so late sry

http://puu.sh/vB8xc/5d309841ea.osz

u should probably mention to use custom hs cuz this sounds pretty terrible without them lol cool

short mod too just some minor stuff i noticed while doing the hs

[My Angel Deppyforce]

1. 00:32:027 (1,2,3,4) - why not use 1/8 idk fixed
2. 00:36:327 (2,7) - maybe just stack would look better its already stacked
3. 00:50:027 (4) - i would suggest dividing this into two and then add a circle at the end like this http://puu.sh/vB91k/69fa8a361b.jpg cuz it sounds like another one at the white tick 00:50:227 - and there should be clickable for the strong sound at 00:50:427 - i guess the circle at the end is optional but definitely try splitting that into 2 did dat and add circle
4. 01:12:227 (8) - missing NC im bad
5. 01:14:127 (1) - and unnecessary NC here thought it helps with reading direction changing square thing but ok removed
6. 01:18:627 (1,1) - wat lol this probably isnt a good idea, maybe http://puu.sh/vB8PW/70507359a0.jpg or http://puu.sh/vB8QD/c5d348a26b.jpg no its different from the next 3/4s so i want to use different rhythm and try listen with 25 playback theres sound only on blue and not on red so cant use 2nd suggestion
7. 01:35:427 (1) - 01:36:827 (4) - check stacking yes
8. 01:48:627 (1) - you can delete this cuz theres no sound at the white yes

- Frontier - wrote:

should be graved i think no

[Beginner]

1. 00:22:627 (3,1) - don't really sure that beginners can play it. maybe avoid stacking them. potassium
2. 01:02:827 - can you extend the break to start at 01:04:227 ?potassium i tot i already did that

[Easy]

1. can you increase the circle size if you can no thisisi fine
2. 00:37:027 (3,1) - not perfectly stack fix
3. 01:02:827 - can you extend the break to start at 01:04:227 ? i thought i alraedy did these wtf

[Normal]

1. widescreen

potassium

lazy to mod
now gimme stars

F1r3tar wrote:

are you actually trying to rank that top diff, lol

Zel wrote:

M4M

Ren's Ex
00:17:827 (1,2,3,4) - these overlaps are so ugly pls fix this ones actually iintentional
01:37:227 (2,2) - this overlap is gross too its not noticeable in game

wow this map is rly fkn good gj Thank you

Nice set, I hope to see it ranked!!!

Zel wrote:

My Angel Deppyforce
00:17:227 (2,2,5) - this overlap structure is odd it looks clean enough imo, its hard to do something like this on cs 2.5 anyways especially at this bpm
00:20:927 (6,2,4) - ^
00:31:127 (6) - this could be placed better, maybe overlap with 00:30:527 (7) - its a square! http://puu.sh/wErxL/7aea16fffa.jpg
00:31:027 (5,7,1,2) - this line isnt straight fix
01:34:027 (2,7) - overlap could be better fixed i think
01:35:427 (1) - this slider is really gross in a bad way na its fine
01:48:227 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - holy shit wtf LOL yes

nice map

Another
00:27:427 (1,2) - These could be blanketed better dats not even supposed to be a blanket
00:29:627 (5,6,1) - this flows so weirdly, I would change it its just a triangle d00d
00:37:827 (1) - rotate this circle some so it doesn't overlap with 00:38:627 (1) - it looks clean enough like this already
01:31:427 (1,2) - these are very ugly, but since you made it parallel with 01:31:027 (4) - i guess its justifiable ofc it is fine and its not ugly
01:31:727 (2,4,1) - ok no tho y not

nice map

Insane
01:09:827 (1) - not straight (ends are not parallel) fix

very well done

Nice set, I hope to see it ranked!!! same!!

Kawashiro wrote:

9.74?? wut happned

Feb wrote:

hi there.

cereal thing

nermal
00:50:727 (1) - the spinner is to short for a lowtier player to react it shud be at least 2 more full 4/1 beats long to comprehend.

will only talk about your diffs.

first diff

00:19:427 (1) - hey this could look like an actual wave! https://feb.s-ul.eu/Oj9Yt77S ye
00:22:627 (3,1) - you don't have these overlaps in any other part of the map and just looks a bit cramped here, so would make sense to have 1 not overlapping 3 like this. 3 bad i have limited space also lets just think of it as emphasize the start of the strong part lOl
01:42:627 (1) - the end of the slider which means everything after the last red anchor is a bit to short and might be a bit confusing. Consider making it a bit longer! k

next diff
3,5 ar is more than enough for this difficulty. The diff is not dense in any place with 3.5 so 4 is not really needed. k

00:20:627 (2) - look how t his unstack major issue!! k
00:29:027 (1,2) - 00:30:627 - the song is very similar in these both parts yet they are differently mapped with different emphasize I think you should map them similar. You could extend 00:30:627 (3) - this slider to 00:31:427 - and add a circle on 00:31:827 - to have the same emphasize. The slider you chose on 00:31:427 - is abit misleading imo, also doesn't follow the song as well as 00:25:027 (4) - this slider. na the fact dat this thing lands on 1/8 is kinda good enough for me
00:41:827 (1,2) - flow from this implies that 00:43:427 (3) - this has the same movement and therfore downwards. Since both share the same shape this could be a bit irritating. its fine lmfao
00:38:627 (1) - this should be mapped the same as 00:32:227 (1) - this part as they are teh same thing, but are differently emphasized. Well actually not to sure about the first 2/1 beats, but 00:33:827 - this one is the exact same thing. dik wat ur talkin about but did something
00:43:427 (3) - ^adding to this I tho about something like this. The flow can be expected better here.
00:57:827 (1) - hey major stack issue!! kool
01:01:027 (1) - ^this when fixed as well lol
01:23:427 (1,2) - imo this a bit unconventional rhythm here for so many beats to choose from. I know you follow that red tick thing which is strong, but imo the white before that shares almost the same sound and plays much easier. The red tick thing is abit to confusing. Also Ending the slider on a strong beat is a bit awkward in easy. Should be alright tho, but yeah mamamamama should be alright tho idk if only mapping 1/1 on song like this i think it will be rly boring cuz it repeats the same thing over and over again with buncha noisy thing dat can bleed beginners ears to death
01:29:427 - i think these beats here are not interesting enough for bad players to extend press this slider fully. I suppose they will just let it go there earlier. I know you wanted to distinct these sounds from the other before, but still. yes i want to make it different so 2nd half of kiai becomes more noticeable

next diff

Can you do a bit of sv changes on the first part of the song meaning everything from 00:13:027 - to 00:25:827 - and 01:10:627 - 01:22:627 - and 01:49:027 - to the end. Since they just felt the same as the kiai and the parts before that also. Makes it a bit less emphasized in comparison to the kiai. I think this would help to make the map more enjoyable. no
00:24:227 (1,2,3) - this part is unreadable speaking in terms of spacing but also density. Currently you need ar5.5 just for this, but without this ar5 is enough here as well. changed it hopefully its readable now!!
00:31:827 - maybe choose a different rhythm here, the only stacks you use which are similar to this are the single stacks. This might be a bit difficult to distinct from the other stackings. lol i just moved 1 out of the stacks
01:13:127 (2) - can you make this slider more wavey questionmark no exclamationmark
01:29:627 (3) - as on the other diff i think this part is just not interesting for bad players since theres just no snare or drum that can be directly followed. Deleting it makes the rhythm easier to identify and you don't skip any important beats either. bad players r bad
01:48:227 (5) - i think a 2/1 slider would fit here more because 01:48:427 - this sound is not really strong to deserve a emphasize even tho a reverse slider does this a bit, but yeah its still implemented with objects right... k i did but now it has gay flow instead

next diff
ok my main problem with the diff are the stack especially those ending on reverses, but also 01:34:227 (2,3,4,5) - these stacks since they are sometimes emphasiyed as sliders and sometimes like this. I think you should do these only on the ending of a combo or as emphasize. These just play a bit random. but the more diverse the more interesting the map feels amirite and idc if im wrong will keep anyways at least it doesnt happen only 1 time in the whole map

00:26:427 (4,5,6) - idk why but these stacks play super weird. Maybe use the same rhythm like 00:28:027 - here. That played quite alright to me. And its almost the same as well. Or do it the other way around so this part is introduced first and the harder one with the circles later. no its fine

I would just say this over and over again, but the diff is good and prolly the best one so far, but ya these stacks man.

next diff
ok this was super dense lol. I couldnt read anything properly besides the slower parts they were actually quite fine. I think raising the ar by at least 0.1 is a good thing already. If it were me I prolly set it to 9.4. Since u know its 300 bpm and has quite some hard readings. ye ok

00:26:027 (2) - another major problem. stack this or u ded. i die
00:31:027 (3,4,5,1) - this should flow similar to no
00:45:627 (4,5,6) - these triplets with no movement do not play good. I think they play better if you give them a bit of distance or use a reverse here. sure
01:11:527 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - to much singletapping . Overemphasize you mapped them accordingly, but for the pace of the song its to much emphasize. agree
01:33:027 (1) - that combo is a bit long. Consider shorting it. agree
01:54:627 (1) - this slider is so troll and unexpected. cool

Imo the spike between another and insane is to high. Mainly due to that much singletapping in another lol. If you reduce some of them I think it suits more into the spread. maybe but i think its godo enough after i reduce singletap in the slow part
The rest of the diffs are not judgeable by me as I cant play any of them. nice

Good Luck! You will probably need it lol

Kisses wrote:

00:25:027 (1,1) - this timing window, wtf col i change