Just to let you guys know: I am not looking for ways to detect this. I am capable of doing this myself, but also do not plan on going to much more effort for previously cited reasons.
This is already how it works. Sorry, maybe the subject was a bit unclear.joshng wrote:
but actually peppy can you leave the flashlight mod available but the scores summited with flashlight open is unranked, i mean like the relax mod if this issue can't be solved.
Reporting what to who?arien666 wrote:
Just reporting would be better imo ;_;
Reporting 'that blog[I bet you know about that orz]' to Googlepeppy wrote:
Reporting what to who?arien666 wrote:
Just reporting would be better imo ;_;
orz, you're right since multi-accounting of Blog thing...peppy wrote:
Google won't do anything about it. It would also be a temporary and ineffective solution.
this is the most true quote ever,also the moment any anti hack program gets installed is the moment you give a fun "challenge" to these kind of people, by what ive seen all anti hack programs really do is increase the amount of hackers, yea its very iratating why ppl would cheat on a dang rythm game, but its nothing new it happens pretty much everywherepeppy wrote:
I'd sooner remove all online rankings. The more I fight against hacks, the more invasive it gets for the good users out there.Zetta wrote:
peppy, you ever thought of getting an anti-hack type of thing? I know they don't work 100% but they could possibly slow them down.
yes it is. :/Hakurei Reimu wrote:
So..all the reason is because that ugly guy do that again?
IP bans are too easy to get aroundHakurei Reimu wrote:
Maybe dimka's IP address should be ban..also..all the hack program compiler.
Unfortunately proxying or spoofing this is way too easy.Hakurei Reimu wrote:
Maybe dimka's IP address should be ban..also..all the hack program compiler.
Vext wrote:
The mod was cheated by simply removing the black blocking everything right? What if..
Same goes for preventative measures. I am not too interested in going to further lengths at this point (but I have considered your suggestion previously and it is indeed good thinking).peppy wrote:
Just to let you guys know: I am not looking for ways to detect this. I am capable of doing this myself, but also do not plan on going to much more effort for previously cited reasons.
Dynamic IP is not the only way to spoof around a IP banmekadon wrote:
Make Dynamic IPs countable as well.
As I said in my previous posts, when you weigh up the issues that will result it is a very slippery slope to take this approach in privacy, performance and maintainability.bluedudowill wrote:
Isn't there any way in which we could run another process .. Like an anti-cheat system for osu!