irc, talked about some other rhythm stuff and some patterning
fine to me

[general]

I think you need a Easy diff, as your lowest diff focuses a lot on 1/2 rhythm and it's too much for complete beginners imo

02:24:006 - not sure why all diffs except for top, ignores this beat

[top diff]

00:24:885 (2,1,1) - this flows pretty difficult, you could just move 00:24:833 (1,2) - below that slider http://i.imgur.com/PclvkU9.png

00:28:350 (5,6) - vs 00:34:971 (5,6) - don't get how come you decide to map these so differently spacing wise

00:47:178 (1,2) - wth spacing, it's even bigger than 00:48:833 (1,2) -

01:05:799 (1,2,3,4,1) - this is so cancer to play because of stream jump + leniency abuse lol

01:09:523 (1,2,3,4) - flows pretty dumb, if you ctrl g 01:09:730 (2) - and 01:10:143 (4) - would be better imo

01:42:109 (1,2) - this looks like 1/2 because you just used 01:40:971 (1,2,3) - which had similar spacing, probably just better nerf the whole thing at 01:42:109 (1,2,3,4,1) -

overall don't get how your spacing is so random at times, compare stuff like 00:52:971 (1,2,3) - vs 00:56:281 (1,2,3) - then 01:00:833 (1,2,3) - vs 01:02:902 (1,2,3) - etc...

[insane]

00:51:730 (1,2) - would look better if you alligned them

same thing as in top diff where spacing is pretty random at times, compare your patern at 01:57:109 (1,2,3,4) - where it's all packed up together to a patern 01:49:247 (1,2,3,4) - where it's spaced pretty wide around the area

man you need to work on your slider art

[hard]

it feels like you aimed for same spacing everywhere and didn't use distance snapping for whatever reason

[normal]

seems good

needs work on spacing more before going to ranked imo

Strategas wrote:

[general]

I think you need a Easy diff, as your lowest diff focuses a lot on 1/2 rhythm and it's too much for complete beginners imo Since the song itself is low bpm, and most of the 1/2 rhythm coming from sliderends anyways, I think that the current Normal is simple enough for a beginner player to understand

02:24:006 - not sure why all diffs except for top, ignores this beat acknowledged this beat for all diffs

[top diff]

00:24:885 (2,1,1) - this flows pretty difficult, you could just move 00:24:833 (1,2) - below that slider http://i.imgur.com/PclvkU9.png Don't think this interferes with flow as much as you say it does. Since there is a very slow slider right before this, the player has a lot of time to prepare for the next note. Additionally, the sliderpath of 00:26:212 (1) - is not intricate and the jump toward it is necessary for exaggeration of the tom on 00:26:212 -

00:28:350 (5,6) - vs 00:34:971 (5,6) - don't get how come you decide to map these so differently spacing wise fixed this inconsistency

00:47:178 (1,2) - wth spacing, it's even bigger than 00:48:833 (1,2) - didnt really think this was detrimental tbh but i fixed this anyways

01:05:799 (1,2,3,4,1) - this is so cancer to play because of stream jump + leniency abuse lol I don't think this hurts gameplay too much. From a playing perspective, there is close spacing during the kickslider stream, and the following jump to the next object flows well to and from the stream and the next slider. From a mapping perspective, the 1/8 kicksliders are necessary to represent the wubs, while the next slider is also needed to keep consistently representing the melody with 1/4 sliders. The jump exaggerates the change in between the two.

01:09:523 (1,2,3,4) - flows pretty dumb, if you ctrl g 01:09:730 (2) - and 01:10:143 (4) - would be better imo I agree that the flow should definitley be improved here. I reorganized these in a better way however to stay more consistent with my spacing concepts https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7939317

01:42:109 (1,2) - this looks like 1/2 because you just used 01:40:971 (1,2,3) - which had similar spacing, probably just better nerf the whole thing at 01:42:109 (1,2,3,4,1) - I agree that this pattern may cause readability problems. I agree this needs better spacing contrast, I just spaced out the first pattern into a jump pattern instead (because I agree with the intensity of the spaced streams) https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7939452 (highlighted spaced stream part)

overall don't get how your spacing is so random at times, compare stuff like 00:52:971 (1,2,3) - vs 00:56:281 (1,2,3) - buffed second pattern then 01:00:833 (1,2,3) - vs 01:02:902 (1,2,3) - buffed secondetc... ill go over more of the map for this

[insane]

00:51:730 (1,2) - would look better if you alligned them sure why not

same thing as in top diff where spacing is pretty random at times, compare your patern at 01:57:109 (1,2,3,4) - where it's all packed up together to a patern 01:49:247 (1,2,3,4) - where it's spaced pretty wide around the area so spacing in general or my pattern distribution throughout the playfeild? ill just treat this the same

man you need to work on your slider art i think its okay..? can you be more specific?

[hard]

it feels like you aimed for same spacing everywhere and didn't use distance snapping for whatever reason I used a little bit of spacing variance to add some diversity to this diff. I don't think this poses as a problem if i didn't stick to one ds throughout the entire map. Plus the distance/spacing differences aren't drastic enough to the point where they hurt the map.

[normal]

seems good

needs work on spacing more before going to ranked imo

Thanks!

normal
i think i might agree with strategas on needing an easy or nerfing the normal's rhythms, they are quite offbeat and complex, they could definitely be simplified more. sv feels a little high too. (see 00:49:661 (1,2,3,4) - // 02:03:730 (4,5,6,7,1,2) - n stuff)
00:06:626 (2) - doesnt look great. red nodes could be on the slider ticks and the first segment's angle could match the 3rd.
00:19:868 (2) - again nodes not on slider ticks feels sloppy and this shape overall doesnt look great. last segment is sloppy and the second segment doesnt fit
00:36:419 (1) - random 0.85x
00:42:212 (5,2) - aren't perfectly stacked (not a fan of these 2 beat overlaps in the easiest diff on the set anyways but ya)
the rhythms in the kiai sections feel odd. i think you should commit to following the lead harder and worry less about the drums, right now its an awkward in between place. i.e.: 00:54:212 (3,4,5) - why is 4 a kickslider but no rhythm between 00:55:454 (6,1) - ? sometimes you highlight drums and sometimes not so its strange. also 00:59:799 (2) - not highlighting the strong lead sound on the white tick
01:32:695 (1,2,3,4) - doesn't look very pretty, flow between 2,3,4 especially

hard
00:00:006 (1) - same suggestions with slider nodes. also the 3rd segment could maybe blanket the tail circle
00:06:626 (1) - shape feels random. asymmetric and convoluted
00:13:247 (1) - first segment is ugly/too curved, same with 4th, 5th segment looks like a poor attempt at blanketing tail. at least just make the curved segments part of a circle instead of randomly curved
00:19:868 (1) - make the two segments symmetric (rotate by -25 and center the red point
00:32:074 (5,6) - think this should be spaced a little further away. i'd recommend spacing 00:31:247 (4) - 1.3x from last object and next
00:36:212 (7) - random. u didn't do this any of the previous times and the sound here isn't louder than previous (or at least barely)
00:47:592 (4,5,1) - feels too energetic to stack
00:57:523 (1,2,3) - is reusing the shape of 00:56:281 (1,2,3) - but 00:56:488 (2) - and 00:57:937 (3) - don't stack and also have different spacing instead
01:04:143 (1,2,3) - ugly flow mainly cause of 2
01:06:626 (2,1) - don't like this since you stack 1/2 sometimes. could trip people up but might be fine
01:57:523 (1,2,3) - 2 should be equally spaced between 1 and 3
01:52:557 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 2,3 looks like its 1,2 rotated by ~30 degrees or something but then for 5,6 instead of an extra 30 degrees its like 80. either commit to the gradual rotation increase or make each circle+slider bit unique. i know this sounds super small and it prob is but it helps with structure and visual consistency (instances like 02:05:799 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - are different since the musical cue indicated 5,6 should be different)
01:55:868 (1,2,3) - not evenly spaced
02:03:730 (1,2,3) - not evenly spaced + could be a triangle
02:11:592 (3,1) - ugly slight overlap, i think you could make the slider art start on the head of 3 or just farther to the right

insane
00:13:247 (1) - doesn't look great. the first third contradicts the next third contradicts the last third. too many different things going on
00:26:385 (3) - personally would just remove. its a confusing rhythm and throws the player off, doesn't add much. up to you though
00:26:488 (1,2,3,4) - visual spacing here is pretty inconsistent, particularly with 4
00:32:902 (1,2,3) - 00:36:212 (1) - inconsistent
00:38:695 (7,8) - not a fan of the overlap personally
00:41:385 (1,2,3) - 00:43:040 (1,2,3) - first one is spaced more but doesnt feel like it should be. goes against the building energy imo
01:00:212 (1,1) - unnecessary NC i think
01:04:350 (2,3) - bad blanket
01:10:350 (5,3) - could blanket
01:14:695 (4,5,6) - feels like it should be lower to match the flow from 4,5
01:16:143 (1,2,3,4) - each set of 2 sliders contradicts eachother, random rotation makes the visual consistency feel lacking.
01:41:592 (2,1,2,3,4,5,1) - way more complex and the ending triple is far more spaced than any other 1/4 in the map
01:48:833 (1) - unnecessary NC i think
01:51:316 (5,1) - bad blanket also v
01:51:730 (1,2) - rhythm feels random, you dont do this anywhere else (00:58:764 (1,2,3,4) - )
01:55:040 (1,2) - bad blanket
01:55:868 (1,2,3) - flows poorly
02:10:350 (1,2,3) - why does 3 break visual trend
02:12:419 (1) - first two segments are ugly, you could make them symmetric to eachother. last segment has an ugly lip where the red node is

titz
00:00:006 (1) - opinion but ctrl+g would look nicer
00:06:626 (1) - final 3 segments look like they are trying to be a hexagon but failed. the angles dont relate to eachother in any way and it bothers me a
00:13:247 (1,2) - disagree with the choice to space these
00:19:006 (2,3) - think its better to simplify to circle and slider personally (also 02:18:178 (2,3) - if you change)
00:43:040 (1,2) - no reason to do this imo. + you dont do it here 00:48:006 (1,2,3) - . i guess that part is following the drums but it feels really unclear
the overlaps in the kiai feel really random, as in which objects you choose to overlap. example: 00:55:454 (1,4) -
00:57:937 (1) - shouldnt be NC'd
01:00:212 (1) - ^
01:01:661 (1) - ^
01:02:074 (2) - should be NC'd (you start NC's in kiai with a 1-2-3 / 1-2-3 / 1-2 beat pattern but then it just falls apart)
01:07:040 (1) - unnecessary NC
01:08:281 (1) - shouldnt be NC'd, 01:08:695 (2) - should. (or its just inconsistent with 00:54:833 (4,5,6) - )
ok overall the NCs in the kiai are just really sloppy and i cant udnerstand what u wanted them to be. i would go through and just NC them to 1-2-3 / 1-2-3 / 1-2 beat pattern or somehow give them more structure otherwise.
01:32:488 (1) - unnecessary NC
01:34:557 (2) - again not necessary, super random especially since in the first buildup / intro you did this for the lead, not the drums. (see also 01:37:868 (2,3) - )
01:41:799 (3,1,2,3,4,1) - mega diff spike and super hard to read with 01:42:109 (1) - being NC'd and the spacing being so large on a new rhythm
01:48:833 (1,2) - almost impossible to read especially since its the only time in either kiai you use this rhythm or an SV change
02:05:799 (1,2) - spacing feels small with the 1/4 rhythm spacing being so large (also 02:07:040 (1,2) - )
02:20:695 (1) - first and final segments dont have the same angle and the bump is super random

dsco wrote:

normal
i think i might agree with strategas on needing an easy or nerfing the normal's rhythms, they are quite offbeat and complex, they could definitely be simplified more. sv feels a little high too. (see 00:49:661 (1,2,3,4) - // 02:03:730 (4,5,6,7,1,2) - n stuff)
00:06:626 (2) - doesnt look great. red nodes could be on the slider ticks and the first segment's angle could match the 3rd. i dont intent for the straight portions of this slider to be of even length or parallel
00:19:868 (2) - again nodes not on slider ticks feels sloppy and this shape overall doesnt look great. last segment is sloppy and the second segment doesnt fit second and thrid segments curve at the same amount. first and last part of the third segment parallel with the first
00:36:419 (1) - random 0.85x opps
00:42:212 (5,2) - aren't perfectly stacked (not a fan of these 2 beat overlaps in the easiest diff on the set anyways but ya) fix
the rhythms in the kiai sections feel odd. i think you should commit to following the lead harder and worry less about the drums, right now its an awkward in between place. i.e.: 00:54:212 (3,4,5) - why is 4 a kickslider but no rhythm between 00:55:454 (6,1) - ? sometimes you highlight drums and sometimes not so its strange. also 00:59:799 (2) - not highlighting the strong lead sound on the white tick i follow the lead with slider heads, tails and circles, and am careful not to overmap to the players ability while doing this
01:32:695 (1,2,3,4) - doesn't look very pretty, flow between 2,3,4 especially 2 and 3 have the same curve, 3 connects 2 and 4 through flow.

hard
00:00:006 (1) - same suggestions with slider nodes. also the 3rd segment could maybe blanket the tail circle evened slider node placement here
00:06:626 (1) - shape feels random. asymmetric and convoluted added symmetry
00:13:247 (1) - first segment is ugly/too curved, same with 4th, 5th segment looks like a poor attempt at blanketing tail. at least just make the curved segments part of a circle instead of randomly curved fixed a lot about this slider
00:19:868 (1) - make the two segments symmetric (rotate by -25 and center the red point it already is symmetric
00:32:074 (5,6) - think this should be spaced a little further away. i'd recommend spacing 00:31:247 (4) - 1.3x from last object and next did suggestion
00:36:212 (7) - random. u didn't do this any of the previous times and the sound here isn't louder than previous (or at least barely) removed
00:47:592 (4,5,1) - feels too energetic to stack want to stack all triples in hard for readability's sake (compare to 00:54:833 (4,5,6) - )
00:57:523 (1,2,3) - is reusing the shape of 00:56:281 (1,2,3) - but 00:56:488 (2) - and 00:57:937 (3) - don't stack and also have different spacing instead fixed also use alt+slect next time lol
01:04:143 (1,2,3) - ugly flow mainly cause of 2 changed flow of 2
01:06:626 (2,1) - don't like this since you stack 1/2 sometimes. could trip people up but might be fine since its a 1/1 beat its more obvious
01:57:523 (1,2,3) - 2 should be equally spaced between 1 and 3 done
01:52:557 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 2,3 looks like its 1,2 rotated by ~30 degrees or something but then for 5,6 instead of an extra 30 degrees its like 80. either commit to the gradual rotation increase or make each circle+slider bit unique. i know this sounds super small and it prob is but it helps with structure and visual consistency (instances like 02:05:799 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - are different since the musical cue indicated 5,6 should be different) theres not really enough space to let that rotation happen but i continued to blanket the circle as 2 and 4 suggested
01:55:868 (1,2,3) - not evenly spaced made even
02:03:730 (1,2,3) - not evenly spaced + could be a triangle did this
02:11:592 (3,1) - ugly slight overlap, i think you could make the slider art start on the head of 3 or just farther to the right found an alternative

insane
00:13:247 (1) - doesn't look great. the first third contradicts the next third contradicts the last third. too many different things going on last third parallel to first third, second third parallels with itself and curves at the same rate as the last third near its point of inflection
00:26:385 (3) - personally would just remove. its a confusing rhythm and throws the player off, doesn't add much. up to you though would rather stick with what applies most to the music
00:26:488 (1,2,3,4) - visual spacing here is pretty inconsistent, particularly with 4 uh dont know if this is what you were talking about but i moved 3 a little to compensate for this
00:32:902 (1,2,3) - 00:36:212 (1) - inconsistent made consistent
00:38:695 (7,8) - not a fan of the overlap personally i think its fine
00:41:385 (1,2,3) - 00:43:040 (1,2,3) - first one is spaced more but doesnt feel like it should be. goes against the building energy imo spaced it similarly
01:00:212 (1,1) - unnecessary NC i think this 1,2 pattern is consistent
01:04:350 (2,3) - bad blanket made it not bad
01:10:350 (5,3) - could blanket fixed
01:14:695 (4,5,6) - feels like it should be lower to match the flow from 4,5 did that
01:16:143 (1,2,3,4) - each set of 2 sliders contradicts eachother, random rotation makes the visual consistency feel lacking. gave this more visual flow to make it look less segmented
01:41:592 (2,1,2,3,4,5,1) - way more complex and the ending triple is far more spaced than any other 1/4 in the map fixed the triple
01:48:833 (1) - unnecessary NC i think nc is for sv change
01:51:316 (5,1) - bad blanket also v
01:51:730 (1,2) - rhythm feels random, you dont do this anywhere else (00:58:764 (1,2,3,4) - ) changed
01:55:040 (1,2) - bad blanket fixed
01:55:868 (1,2,3) - flows poorly angled this pattern and tinkered with spacing ehre
02:10:350 (1,2,3) - why does 3 break visual trend 1 and 2 are tangental to the first part of three
02:12:419 (1) - first two segments are ugly, you could make them symmetric to eachother. last segment has an ugly lip where the red node is simplified this according to what you said

titz
00:00:006 (1) - opinion but ctrl+g would look nicer Would rather these stacked like this because of the strumming rhythm
00:06:626 (1) - final 3 segments look like they are trying to be a hexagon but failed. the angles dont relate to eachother in any way and it bothers me a The last three segments are supposed to be symmertical with themselves, with its line of symmetry perpendicular to the first part of the slider. i made this more obvious
00:13:247 (1,2) - disagree with the choice to space these mimicked the first one since its very similar at 00:00:006 (1,2) -
00:19:006 (2,3) - think its better to simplify to circle and slider personally (also 02:18:178 (2,3) - if you change) agreed. simplified
00:43:040 (1,2) - no reason to do this imo. The kicksliders were supposed to follow the melody. I made this more obvious with 00:44:281 (5,2) - + you dont do it here 00:48:006 (1,2,3) - . i guess that part is following the drums but it feels really unclear yeah this whole part follows the drums at 00:46:350 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,4) -
the overlaps in the kiai feel really random, as in which objects you choose to overlap. example: 00:55:454 (1,4) - dont see how these are random, i just regularly overlap my objects in patterns throughout the kiai 00:54:419 (2,4) - 00:57:730 (2,3,4) - 01:03:937 (5,4) - 01:04:143 (1,5) - 01:06:212 (1,1) - 01:08:281 (1,3) - 01:10:350 (1,3) - etc.
00:57:937 (1) - shouldnt be NC'd
01:00:212 (1) - ^
01:01:661 (1) - ^
01:02:074 (2) - should be NC'd (you start NC's in kiai with a 1-2-3 / 1-2-3 / 1-2 beat pattern but then it just falls apart)
01:07:040 (1) - unnecessary NC antiflow
01:08:281 (1) - shouldnt be NC'd, 01:08:695 (2) - should. (or its just inconsistent with 00:54:833 (4,5,6) - )
ok overall the NCs in the kiai are just really sloppy and i cant udnerstand what u wanted them to be. i would go through and just NC them to 1-2-3 / 1-2-3 / 1-2 beat pattern or somehow give them more structure otherwise. I redid all ncs (including ones you modded for) in the kiai to have the 3/3/2 beat pattern
01:32:488 (1) - unnecessary NC
01:34:557 (2) - again not necessary, super random especially since in the first buildup / intro you did this for the lead, not the drums. (see also 01:37:868 (2,3) - ) changed back to a sliderend because i didnt like this either
01:41:799 (3,1,2,3,4,1) - mega diff spike and super hard to read with 01:42:109 (1) - being NC'd and the spacing being so large on a new rhythm dont see this being much of a diff spike or a reading problem with streams throughout the map like 01:45:523 (1,2,3,4,1) - 01:47:799 (4,5,6) - 01:53:178 (4,4,5,6) - etc. The nc is only to signify the intensity change between 01:41:592 (1,2,3) - and 01:42:109 (1,2,3,4,1) - in gameplay and music
01:48:833 (1,2) - almost impossible to read especially since its the only time in either kiai you use this rhythm or an SV change
02:05:799 (1,2) - spacing feels small with the 1/4 rhythm spacing being so large (also 02:07:040 (1,2) - ) buffed and evened out both
02:20:695 (1) - first and final segments dont have the same angle and the bump is super random its just an aesthetic to avoid a boring straight slider

helped a lot. Thanks!

Things for insane diff

1. 00:08:281 (2) - 00:23:178 (1) - those two slidershapes feels out of place because every other slider is curved but those two is not (yea i know im great at modding)
2. 00:48:213 (2,3) - you can ctrl+g those two, this way 00:48:833 (4) - emphasized a bit more
3. 01:12:006 (1,2) - gap betwee those looks like 1/2 :/
   also i think you can space 01:12:626 (3) - from 01:12:212 (2) - a it more for better emphasis because now spacing between those is less than between 01:11:592 (5,1) - even tho 01:12:626 (3) - have much stronger sound than 01:12:006 (1) -

m4m sorry if short mod

[General]

soft-hitfinish2.wav might have an unrankable delay, i suggest you really check that

[Normal]

00:04:971 (1,2,3) - i know it might be difficult but probably making all of these slider art would be cool, 1 and 3 just being regular curved sliders is kinda inconsistent with 2 and a bit boring imo :/

00:32:281 - this just not being mapped is really weird because you mapped 00:31:247 (3) - (which is a reverse tail)

00:50:488 (3,4) - http://puu.sh/vNdSw/05452eab40.jpg something like this idk the 4 seems a bit meh

02:12:419 (1) - i would probably start the spinner here

i think the spacing is fine on this but the sv is quite high imo

[Hard]

00:13:247 (1) - uhhhhh, are you sure this is supposed to end on the blue and not the white tick?

01:19:040 (4,5,1) - not a big fan of the 1 going to the right maybe, http://puu.sh/vNeNM/550b94ca42.jpg

01:32:281 (1,2,1) - not a fan of the straightforward entry into the slider due to the fact that 1 is curved, i suggest https://puu.sh/vNeTY/9674236711.jpg

I actually really like this hard

[Insane]

00:38:695 (8,9) - yeah this overlap is not a big fan, i would move it tho, it would probably work better if it was a 1/2 gap

01:14:074 (1,2,3) - this is quite hard angle to hit for the target audience of this diff

01:41:592 (2,1) - i would make these closer tbh

01:42:109 (2,3) - and these that's quite a far distance for an insane, maybe do a cute overlap from slider 1

01:55:868 (1,2,3) - quite awkward, maybe? https://puu.sh/vNft2/7c6b863beb.jpg

02:04:143 (3,4,5) - a play may hit 5 early and slider break, maybe increase the distance so it's more clear that it's a 1/2 gap

[TITS]

fuckin love this diff name and the diff

00:42:833 (5,1) - this is a bit far even tho 1 isn't THAT strong

00:51:730 (1,1) - yeah this is REALLY far, i know it's probably not your intention to fix this, but first time playing it really caught me off guard.

01:05:385 (1,1) - maybe space these out a little so that players don't think it's a 1/4th gap

01:54:212 (3,4,5,6) - the entry to 6 is very awkward, move it more to the right


one thing that questions me is why your base ds for hard is 2.1x and the insane is 1.4x, seems quite weird lmao


good luck and very nice set you have!

Su1fu7 wrote:

Things for insane diff

1. 00:08:281 (2) - 00:23:178 (1) - those two slidershapes feels out of place because every other slider is curved but those two is not (yea i know im great at modding) I think these aesthetics fit in okay with the map because i also use some straight edges on different sliders, even if they're not entirely curved (00:19:868 (1) - etc)
2. 00:48:213 (2,3) - you can ctrl+g those two, this way 00:48:833 (4) - emphasized a bit more did this
3. 01:12:006 (1,2) - gap betwee those looks like 1/2 :/ fixed and remapped this part lmao
   also i think you can space 01:12:626 (3) - from 01:12:212 (2) - a it more for better emphasis because now spacing between those is less than between 01:11:592 (5,1) - even tho 01:12:626 (3) - have much stronger sound than 01:12:006 (1) - did this also

osuskrub wrote:

m4m sorry if short mod

[General]

soft-hitfinish2.wav might have an unrankable delay, i suggest you really check that [url=no delay]http://imgur.com/q5F4deM.png[/url]

[Normal]

00:04:971 (1,2,3) - i know it might be difficult but probably making all of these slider art would be cool, 1 and 3 just being regular curved sliders is kinda inconsistent with 2 and a bit boring imo :/ made 2 more curvy

00:32:281 - this just not being mapped is really weird because you mapped 00:31:247 (3) - (which is a reverse tail) I think i prefer to keep this rhythm more simple. Its a more calm part, and it would be easier for the player just to focus on following one instrument at a time

00:50:488 (3,4) - http://puu.sh/vNdSw/05452eab40.jpg something like this idk the 4 seems a bit meh 00:50:488 (3,4) - parallels wtih 00:49:661 (1,3,4) -

02:12:419 (1) - i would probably start the spinner here Would rather have the last note clicked because it puts more of an emphasis on that start of the note than spinning through the entire chord

i think the spacing is fine on this but the sv is quite high imo

[Hard]

00:13:247 (1) - uhhhhh, are you sure this is supposed to end on the blue and not the white tick? Opps LOL

01:19:040 (4,5,1) - not a big fan of the 1 going to the right maybe, http://puu.sh/vNeNM/550b94ca42.jpg didnt do this but gave the note placement more structure

01:32:281 (1,2,1) - not a fan of the straightforward entry into the slider due to the fact that 1 is curved, i suggest https://puu.sh/vNeTY/9674236711.jpg ohh nice suggestion

I actually really like this hard

[Insane]

00:38:695 (8,9) - yeah this overlap is not a big fan, i would move it tho, it would probably work better if it was a 1/2 gap fine, because a lot of people modded for this

01:14:074 (1,2,3) - this is quite hard angle to hit for the target audience of this diff i changed this part entirely

01:41:592 (2,1) - i would make these closer tbh fits the spacing of other kickslider-gaps that i use in the diff (01:13:247 (2,3) - etc)

01:42:109 (2,3) - and these that's quite a far distance for an insane, maybe do a cute overlap from slider 1 spaced closer but no cute overlap, sry

01:55:868 (1,2,3) - quite awkward, maybe? https://puu.sh/vNft2/7c6b863beb.jpg i liked this suggestion a lot!

02:04:143 (3,4,5) - a play may hit 5 early and slider break, maybe increase the distance so it's more clear that it's a 1/2 gap spaced a little farther

[TITS]

fuckin love this diff name and the diff Thanks!

00:42:833 (5,1) - this is a bit far even tho 1 isn't THAT strong nerfed a little bit

00:51:730 (1,1) - yeah this is REALLY far, i know it's probably not your intention to fix this, but first time playing it really caught me off guard. Yeah not exactly my intention to fix this. I think the moment where the player encounters this spacing change upon the "tits" vox adds a lighthearted, whimsical element of gameplay that makes the player ask what just happened

01:05:385 (1,1) - maybe space these out a little so that players don't think it's a 1/4th gap The slow down in flow is okay here because the record scratch implies it

01:54:212 (3,4,5,6) - the entry to 6 is very awkward, move it more to the right good call


one thing that questions me is why your base ds for hard is 2.1x and the insane is 1.4x, seems quite weird lmao it is kind of weird lmao. i use .75 sv in hard and 1.5 sv in insane


good luck and very nice set you have!

Going to make more spacing changed and an easy diff

[Normal]
00:04:971 (1) - why is there a drum sample on the slider slide? its making the tick sound which feels really out of place
00:18:212 (1) - omg its a beizer slider
00:50:488 (3,4) - this angle feels a bit weird... I would move 00:51:109 (4) down a bit
01:37:661 (4,5) - these two together feels a bit randomly placed, 01:38:488 (5) should go more to the left
02:12:833 (1) - should end at 02:15:730 similar to how you handled 00:00:006 (1)

[Hard]
00:09:937 (3) - that slight overlap is triggering me, either make them not overlap or overlap a bit more :/
00:44:281 (5,6,1) - equal distant triangle you know the deal
00:50:488 (3,4) - since this is a Hard diff you can consider using 1/4 repeat sliders

[Insane]
00:52:143 (2) - why not make the a slider like 00:51:730 (1)? you did it in the hardest diff and this doesnt make the map any harder
01:05:385 (1) - you used a 1/2 slider here on the hardest diff, so an extended slider here actually sounds a bit out of place imo
01:58:350 (1) - ^

[Tits]
00:00:109 (2) - this should be snapped to 1/6, you had it right at 00:13:247 (1,2)
00:39:523 (8,1) - make a triplet here like 00:32:902 (8,9,1)?
01:06:626 (3,1) - stacking this makes it a bit easier to sight read
01:41:799 (3,1) - this angle feels a bit uncomfortable to play, you might want to adjust 01:41:799 (3) more toward the right
01:59:592 (3,1) - same as 01:06:626 (3,1)

ok call me back after you fix stuff

jonathanlfj wrote:

[Normal]
00:04:971 (1) - why is there a drum sample on the slider slide? its making the tick sound which feels really out of place didnt catch that. Fixed
00:18:212 (1) - omg its a beizer slider made it so it wasnt beizer
00:50:488 (3,4) - this angle feels a bit weird... I would move 00:51:109 (4) down a bit moved it down
01:37:661 (4,5) - these two together feels a bit randomly placed, 01:38:488 (5) should go more to the left moved it to the left
02:12:833 (1) - should end at 02:15:730 similar to how you handled 00:00:006 (1) shortened

[Hard]
00:09:937 (3) - that slight overlap is triggering me, either make them not overlap or overlap a bit more :/ haha fine, separated this
00:44:281 (5,6,1) - equal distant triangle you know the deal made it of equal distance
00:50:488 (3,4) - since this is a Hard diff you can consider using 1/4 repeat sliders actually i like this suggestion, doing this

[Insane]
00:52:143 (2) - why not make the a slider like 00:51:730 (1)? you did it in the hardest diff and this doesnt make the map any harder sure why not xd
01:05:385 (1) - you used a 1/2 slider here on the hardest diff, so an extended slider here actually sounds a bit out of place imo makes sense
01:58:350 (1) - ^ same

[Tits]
00:00:109 (2) - this should be snapped to 1/6, you had it right at 00:13:247 (1,2) did this the same way as 13:247
00:39:523 (8,1) - make a triplet here like 00:32:902 (8,9,1)? good catch. did this
01:06:626 (3,1) - stacking this makes it a bit easier to sight read changed back tot he original offset stack
01:41:799 (3,1) - this angle feels a bit uncomfortable to play, you might want to adjust 01:41:799 (3) more toward the right i think you mean rotate it? i rotated it to point more towards one
01:59:592 (3,1) - same as 01:06:626 (3,1) done

ok call me back after you fix stuff

Thanks

alright good luck!

hi im back

[tits]
only thing that kinda irritated me when playing was 01:06:109 (4,1) - and the other time
the cursor movement is already really limited by the sliders, so having that sudden jump kinda felt really awkward to play. i think the change in slider velocity is enough here, or a smalled jump if you want visual spacing same
00:47:178 (1,2) - felt kind overspaced idk
[hard]
01:48:833 (7) - missing nc
yehaj

Naotoshi wrote:

hi im back

[tits]
only thing that kinda irritated me when playing was 01:06:109 (4,1) - and the other time
the cursor movement is already really limited by the sliders, so having that sudden jump kinda felt really awkward to play. i think the change in slider velocity is enough here, or a smalled jump if you want visual spacing same taking advantage of the slider leniency here, and the change in the music between the wubs and the kick



also adding some hitsounds to 00:39:523 (8,9,3,5,2) - because i forgot to hitsoudn these when i made rhythm changes lolol

00:47:178 (1,2) - felt kind overspaced idk did this because 00:47:178 (1) - is stronger
[hard]
01:48:833 (7) - missing nc added one
yehaj

thanks for all the help

d

tits?

Do you really think people are going to search "tits" with the intention of finding a beatmap that apparently references a chickadee?

Better to remove the tag imo lol

Monstrata wrote:

tits?

Do you really think people are going to search "tits" with the intention of finding a beatmap that apparently references a chickadee?

Better to remove the tag imo lol

i do tbh... its probably the most memorable part of the song and I often found myself confusing it for the title. its a fair tag, although it may not make sense if you don't listen to the song. Think about it kinda like the tag 'haitai' in Yuima-ru*World; its not so people can discover songs that are 'haitai'.

tits is an allowed diffname?

Joezapy wrote:

Monstrata wrote:

tits?

Do you really think people are going to search "tits" with the intention of finding a beatmap that apparently references a chickadee?

Better to remove the tag imo lol

i do tbh... its probably the most memorable part of the song and I often found myself confusing it for the title. its a fair tag, although it may not make sense if you don't listen to the song. Think about it kinda like the tag 'haitai' in Yuima-ru*World; its not so people can discover songs that are 'haitai'.

What joe said is very accurate. I think of this song as "the tits song" more than I do "Special Guest - Views"

Pachiru wrote:

tits is an allowed diffname?

i made it pretty clear that tits is referring to the type of bird, not the nsfw kind.

when did nao become t2

also,
o yea forgot that rule ty udc

check icon dates

squirrelpascals wrote:

i made it pretty clear that tits is referring to the type of bird, not the nsfw kind.

you are referring to this kind creature called "tits" here is a picture of it


The thing you are missing though is that the "tit" has "tits" of it's own, therefore proving you wrong and also providing evidence as to why the diff name is a nsfw word to us and to the "tits" since the "tits" have "tits" of their own!
Also keep in mind that "tits" are usually used aggressively amongst the crowd. How you may ask? Well here are some examples:

The Great Novel Writer wrote:

A man and a woman are in the park and the man spots a nice nest full of tits, he then proceeds to shout: "Woman! Please hold those tits so that they don't fly away! I want to take a photo of them and send to all my friends!"

That usage of strong language isn't pleasant for the "tits" and dus makes them scared and stops them from breeding! Another example would be this scenario:

The Great Novel Writer wrote:

2 friends are walking out of a bar at midnight (really drunk) and they spot 2 tits flying across the sky. They know it's them because of their really standing out blue bodies. They got so interested that they wanted to take one home (really important you keep in mind they are drunk), so they proceed to shout at the tits: "Calm down you wild pair of tits! We only want to take you home, to play with you!" The birds then proceed to ignore the 2 friends which makes them really angry, which leads to them shouting abuse at the tits which attracts attention of the which leads to some serious accusations... of sexual harassment.

As you see yourself the word "tit" really makes only for aggressive usage, it isn't beneficial at all for the birds to be abused like this! So as you see yourself the nsfw word goes both for humans and birds! It isn't nice both ways! It's really inappropriate!

What's my point? Maps/songs like these hurt the nature on a really big scale. Look here are some very relevant facts!



People! You have to wake up! This is the final call to stop this ABUSE!!

The "tits" diffname matters a lot! it hurts the environment! especially the "tits" will be really hurt with the usage of the word "tit"! Help us change the meaning of "tits" !! Repost this on MySpace for additional attention!


the Tits!

Wow, congratulations on getting qualified!

last diff:
01:32:488 (1,2,1) - dude what happened with this triplet, I think it can be more linear, since you did that with other triplets and also, the distance betweem 1,2 and 2,3 shud be equal i think
01:41:695 - why this is note mapped, but 01:39:109 - 01:39:212 - this isnt? I think you can improve consistency here
on sounds like 01:46:764 - there could be SV change, since its an Extra, just DS emphasis isnt enough in my opinion
02:12:419 - 02:12:523 - should be note+slider i suppose? 00:09:937 - like you did here
i guess its a significant mistake ^

i mean, its mostly fine, but i guess you will be regreting about this thing that you could do better.
not gonna request DQ

Get out of here with that consistency shit don't you see this is a meme shitmap smh himei what is wrong with u

ok dad

hi-mei wrote:

last diff:
01:32:488 (1,2,1) - dude what happened with this triplet, I think it can be more linear, since you did that with other triplets and also, the distance betweem 1,2 and 2,3 shud be equal i think 01:32:695 (1) - is offset to the right of 01:32:488 (1,2) - on purpose to bring out the strong beat at 01:32:695 -
01:41:695 - why this is note mapped, but 01:39:109 - 01:39:212 - this isnt? I think you can improve consistency here The music is much more intense at 01:41:592 (1,2) - , these notes are very subtle in the easier part
on sounds like 01:46:764 - there could be SV change, since its an Extra, just DS emphasis isnt enough in my opinion Don't see why there would be an sv change here, the only thing that this would emphasize would be the snare, plus this wouldn't follow my sv change patterns at all
02:12:419 - 02:12:523 - should be note+slider i suppose? 00:09:937 - like you did here Im paying attention to the drum hit here rather then the intricacies of the piano. This keeps the whole pattern at 02:12:006 (2,3,1) - more continuous in rhythm
i guess its a significant mistake ^

i mean, its mostly fine, but i guess you will be regreting about this thing that you could do better.
not gonna request DQ

C00L wrote:

...

I'll probably support your movement after this moves to ranked :thinking:

Please link me an official metadata reference, thanks.

IamKwaN wrote:

Please link me an official metadata reference, thanks.

https://soundcloud.com/itsspecialguest/views Off of his soundcloud

cool, thanks

tits

gratz on ranking!