I asked for backup.johnmedina999 wrote:
If you have no access to osu while at work, how could you know that four people were killed?
I asked for backup.johnmedina999 wrote:
If you have no access to osu while at work, how could you know that four people were killed?
Flanster wrote:
I asked for backup.
Flanster wrote:
More like for them to take care of it since I couldn't do anything lol.
Flanster wrote:
who cares lol, being a mod makes me automatically involved
duh i moderate this place mostly now, remember???johnmedina999 wrote:
you purposefully involved yourself with the murder
Flanster wrote:
johnmedina999 wrote:
you purposefully involved yourself with the murder
duh i moderate this place mostly now, remember???
johnmedina999 wrote:
you are guilty of murdering the innocent johnmedina999 and abraker.
This is irrlevant to the case. Even if Flanster was the killer, he might be proven innocent if citizens of OT find the actions justifyable.johnmedina999 wrote:
So you admit that you were the primary person responsible, and your backup was you accomplice?Flanster wrote:
I asked for backup.
abraker wrote:
This is irrlevant to the case. Even if Flanster was the killer, he might be proven innocent if citizens of OT find the actions justifyable.
Bwoah to you too, dear sirFlanster wrote:
bwoah
What constitutes as spam? I posted my thoughts. While it was on every letter thread, it was not the same post over and over again. Would it be any different if I wrote a great work?Flanster wrote:
abraker has bonus points on this since he posted in every single one of Khelly's threads.
For whatever function it served or whatever intent was behind it, spam is spam. If you're innocent, I'm Lewis Hamilton.
There is nothing to think about when it comes to who initiated the events leading up to this.johnmedina999 wrote:
I'm simply giving the jury something to think about when they make their final decision.abraker wrote:
This is irrlevant to the case. Even if Flanster was the killer, he might be proven innocent if citizens of OT find the actions justifyable.
ye olde OTabraker wrote:
I posted my thoughts.
Your voice is a single one out of several qualified OT judges here. At least 5 need to vote. We have one.[Taiga] wrote:
JUDGE TAKING VOICE
abraker - guilty
johnmedina999 - guilty
If someone is against judge decision - make a petition with appropiate amount of signs against it.