Okay first yes I'm sorry for using words who could be interpreted like I'm rude, but that's just how I want to show how bad it looks, tho if explanations about issues are good enough then k that's fine. Sorry for that.
@RLC : yes I said I disliked the map due to the "technical" style from your mapping, tho that was not the main issue when I did this mod. You can have your style and done it perfectly, and that's subjective to say if I like it or not. But I saw here issues who at least wasn't subective to me that's why. No offense ;w;
About the mod itself :
@RLC : yes I said I disliked the map due to the "technical" style from your mapping, tho that was not the main issue when I did this mod. You can have your style and done it perfectly, and that's subjective to say if I like it or not. But I saw here issues who at least wasn't subective to me that's why. No offense ;w;
About the mod itself :
- 01:09:203 (3,4,1) - The problem is not about flow or anything, it's about the spacing between the two 1/4 circles who is highly different from the next one 01:10:229 (3,4,1) - who have the same intensity and map same music elements, or even the same kind of pattern just after at 01:13:305 (3,4,1) - , and I don't see why you break your consistency for no real reason here.
- 01:23:562 (2,1) - I said abuse, because you can play that since the slider end authorize you to play it since you don't have to go until the end to jump to that stream (sliders are lenient in terms of hitwindow), but in fact there's not enough time (just a 1/4 rhythm) to do that big jump. That's why it should be reduced a bit.
- 01:50:100 (2) - I still don't agree with that additive mapping. You probably have your reasons to do so, but the fact than we can hear a music element on 01:49:972 - makes it off and a bit weird to catch ingame. Even if was an extended slider as Irre said, it would skip it and wouldn't resolve that issue. Add objects on nothing just don't work in that case sorry :c
- 00:22:023 (2,3,4) - Just the opposite movement from the slider after 00:22:023 (2,3) - was a bit weird, but that's more subjective so if you don't want to change it that's still k.
- 00:30:485 (4,5) - If you effectivelly emphasized the pitch, why 00:29:715 (1,2,3,4) - is not too like RLC did 00:46:126 (1,2,3,4,5) - ?
- 01:04:587 (1,1) - Then at least stack them and do a real symetric pattern. It really look like you did a sort of random placement or a mistake.