Hitsu wrote:

Hi~ Your request from topic p/5787990

General:

Better to make the volume of hitsoulds a bit lower at the beggining of the map.
change to soft 60%

Map:

01:23:882 (406) - according to the song this should be k (suggesting switching it to k ofc) so i'd rather switch 01:23:796 (405) to d.
will think about it...the drum here is k but the sound effect is low pitch here,that's d...
will think about your point :thinking:
01:26:196 (429) - for me d here sounds really strange, feels like the pattern doesn't fit here at all. I'd rather switch to d.
From here,I change the whole thing to kkdkdkkdkk...
01:34:853 (522) - just again d sounds strange here, better switch to k and 01:34:767 (521) to d if you want.
same as 01:23:882 (406) -
01:36:139 - maybe add a note? Because feels empty in here.
I want here to be consistent with 01:25:167 - ,no change.
01:59:198 (94) - k maybe.
map it background sound effect here,not the piano,so I would keep this as kkd
02:20:541 - add a note (?), tune is just begging me to add a not here D:
I want to give a break here(no super long stream here XDD),so no change
02:24:741 (132,133) - switching these two to opposite will sound better.
changed
02:26:712 - this one also seems like it has to have k in here.
same reason as 02:20:541
02:32:626 (215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223) - it seems to me that this part should be in 1/6 according to melody.
No I think?The sound effect remains 1/4...
02:38:112 (269,270,271,272) - kdkd will be better here.
Will think about it...questionable
03:01:255 (463) - d according to the music. And my finger kinda wants to press d instead of k.
03:02:626 (470) - ^
03:06:741 (492) - ^
I see your points,but explained in previous mod
The piano pitch is quite hard in this section
I know changing to d here can reflects the pitch change
but the d hitsound doesn't fit the music at all,so no change :l
04:09:826 (229) - same as 01:23:882 (406) that i wrote the first.
04:20:798 (350) - ^
same as 01:23:882 (406) -

Don't know what else to say, just wish you good luck~

Raphalge wrote:

this'll probably be a pretty shit mod cause I can't really mod stream maps and this already has 4 pages of mods.
The first two pages are full of meme...

[eplis]
01:08:279 (273,274,275,276) - dk kd?
change to kd dk instead
01:13:764 (310,311,312,313) - ^
^
01:18:650 (351) - move to 01:18:564 - ? Feels weird ending streams on blue ticks.
it's how the sound effect performs :l,but yes this is hard to play...I will consider this
01:29:622 (465) - ^ but move to 01:29:622 (465) -
^
01:51:652 (50) - k maybe?
this has lower pitch compared to 01:51:995 - ,so no change
01:59:709 (98) - ^
this has lower pitch compared to 01:59:538 - ,no change :l
02:09:823 (159) - ^
The pitch for these piano sounds(02:09:566 - to 02:10:080 -)are the same,I think changing to k is not suitable
02:32:452 (214) - ^
Instead I change the one for 02:32:338 -
02:49:823 (384) - d for consistency with the dkkd after it?
I want to emphasis the high pitch melody here,so I put k here as to reflect the outstanding pitch for the sound effect here.
03:09:480 (500) - delete?
follow the background sound effect here,I think no need to delete
03:12:223 (508) - ^
^
03:14:966 (515) - ^ the section feels unnecessarily long otherwise
I think it's fine (idk how to explain the reason...my english is bad)
03:41:595 (695) - d? dkdk 1/6's feel really odd
here 03:41:595 - has the higher pitch compared to last note,I think it's fine
03:47:080 (19) - ^
same as above
03:58:052 (115) - ^
^
04:04:595 (174) - suggest moving to 04:04:509 -
reason explained at the third point
04:27:138 (402,403,404,405) - dk kd?
04:32:623 (439,440,441,442) - ^
04:38:109 (477,478,479,480) - ^
^change all to kd dk

sorry for so many ^ and I hope atleast something will be helpful

Stefan wrote:

[ΕΛΠΙΣ]
01:25:336 (420) - kkdkk feels a bit random if you compare the previous and coming pattern and usage of kat. try using kddkk instead.
I map by the sound effect pitch here.
Since I use 01:25:079 - for d as it's low pitch,and I want to emphasis the high pitch sound effect at 01:25:593 -,therefore I put kkdkk here
02:31:766 (208,209,210,211,212,213,214) - I don't find the k usage here very well, 02:32:223 (212,213) - should be d for sure, optional you can make 02:31:880 (209) - as d too since it's slightly deeper than 02:31:423 (205,206) - .
Yes I see your point,changed 02:32:223 (212,213) - to d,but I don't change 02:31:880 (209) - to d as I think k hitsound fits the music more
02:43:766 (334,335,336,337,338) - since the music builds up to be lighter I don't find to repeat kdkkd works well. Use kkddk instead.
Yes kkddk is much better
03:47:622 (25) - k at this spot is extremely strange, d sounds and works by far better.
Ok changed as well

Quite a solid map, it's something different to see parts like the first and last kiai not being continously mapped - I'd expect a big ass stream but it's something nice and interesting you didn't and split them into small combos instead, that's cool.
I tried to put long stream at the last kiai time,but I think it doesn't fit the music at all...so I cut them into shorter streams,which is easier and gives a better emphasising on the music.
The flow is pretty good, although I couldn't play the longer streams properly, the "own" rhythm you add works good.
Thanks ><
You also asked for the consistency which felt good, also by checking the difficulty in the editor I barely found stuff (basically everything I've pointed above was an issue due consistency). I just had the feeling you tried to map several sounds with one specific note sound, mostly k. But that might be just me.
>I just had the feeling you tried to map several sounds with one specific note sound, mostly k.
Rip my english :< I can't understand it...but I hope the consistency is fine to other players as well

Hopefully you can use anything of the said things above, good luck!

cdhsausageboy wrote:

From the WWMTMBWDRWMTMSWHTOSRTOAHOMCF Taiko Queue, sorry for not being Jerry it's fine ww

Inner Oni

1. 00:05:362 - This sound much, much better as a don tbh, having this as a kat hurts the emphasis of the high pitched backup vocals at 00:05:762 and the next kat
   Nice catch
2. 00:27:562 - Maybe change this to a big kat? Feels more natural to play
   But I think K K doesn't fit the music at all :<
3. 00:36:962 - eh for the previous pattern you had dk for no melody (for example 00:30:562 and 00:32:162) while having kk (for example 00:35:362 and 00:28:962), and there's a sharp note here so why not have k owo
   my English is bad and idk how to explain XDD,I just feel d k fits the music more better at this point
4. 01:06:907 (264,265) - I'd rather have this as dk to maintain consistency with 01:05:536 (255,256) (or just change the latter to kd since every other similar is a kd too but imo this as dk sounds better)
5. 01:11:022 (292,293) - ^
6. 04:25:765 (393,394) - ^
7. 04:28:508 (412,413) - ^
8. 04:31:251 (430,431) - ^
9. 04:36:737 (468,469) - ^
10. 04:42:222 (504,505) - ^
    I am sorry,but I map by the sound effect here,01:06:907 - the sound effect is like high-low pitch,that's why I put kd here
    I think consistency is not so important here.
11. 01:18:650 - Move this to 01:18:564 ? The way you have it now kinda reduces the impact at 01:18:736 which is at a strong beat and 01:18:564 has a lower pitch than this point too
    I see your point but I map to the sound effect here,I agree that >it now kinda reduces the impact at 01:18:736 which is at a strong beat and 01:18:564 has a lower pitch than this point too<
    I will consider it later
12. 01:29:622 - ^ same as above
13. 01:33:307 (505,506) - The melody here isn't the same as the 01:32:364 (494,495,496,497,498,499,500,501,502) so maybe change this to dk to bring out the slight change in the music
    I want to emphasis the drum sound at 01:33:307 - ,and it's like high-low pitch,that's why I map as kd here
14. 02:10:395 - Maybe change this to a kat to emphasize the high pitch at 02:10:509 ?
    it's already kat XDD
15. 02:33:823 (228,229,230,231) - owo While I like the concept of the gradual sv change, its so small that it basically doesn't have any effect on the map lol Maybe change the increase to 0.02 ? eh its just a suggestion, its perfectly fine the way it is now lol
    0.02 is too high I think,if I changed to 1.02 and 1.04 etc,for 02:34:166 - it will become 1.1x,which is too high to me.
16. 02:48:909 - This sound more like a don since the pitch here is pretty low
    02:48:909 (376,377,378,379) - These four timestamps are the climax for this kiai time,and the pitch is quite high,
    Yes 02:48:909 - has a lower pitch,but I prefer emphasising the music more than mapping to pitch here.
17. 02:54:909 (430,431) - Isn't there 1/6 between these notes too? Why did you ignore it when you mapped all of the 1/6 before this lol
    I map to the drum and bass starting from 02:54:738 - as it's more dominant and the music starts going calm for the next bar
    so I don't want to put high density 1/6 notes here
18. 03:27:908 - Delete this to emphasize the 1/2 melody? Also see 03:49:594 (48,49,50,51) you had 1/2 here, might as well be more consistent Nice catch changed

Well its been a long time since I've last modded, sorry for nitpicking maybe a little too much ;w; The map (especially the streams) is really fun to play! I also like the "all dons then all kats" pattern at the very end owo
Glad to hear that you enjoy it >3<

Good luck !

Skylish wrote:

我黎呃KDS

[Timing]

* You wanna stay the overall BPM right from 02:56 to 03:07 is 175 x0.9 =157.5 ~157.

> My timing check: https://puu.sh/ugmUy/da59d4b038.rar I have done all barline omittion and SV changes. Please also check it by yourself.
adopted

[ELPIS]

(temperately I used the old timing, remember to shift notes with the new timing!!! esp. after 03:07:084 - )

> 02:04:337 (130,131,132,133,134,135,136) - how about k kdk kkd? Those high-pitch melody falling at 02:04:337 - / 02:04:679 - / 02:05:022 - should be HLed as kat except 02:05:022 - (because you are going to emphasize the upcoming instrumental part). The flow is better now imo.
Nice changed!!

> 02:07:937 - this should be expected as k even though you want to have a repeatitive patterns at 02:07:937 (147,148,149,150) - and 02:08:679 (151,152,153,154) - . Since 02:08:108 - is a new start, 02:07:937 - is still at the previous session, kat is expected and preferred.

> From 02:08:108 - to 02:09:479 - , I think a very concrete D should be put on every on-beat al though the pitch of 02:08:108 (148,149,150) - sound like K dd. Here's the rationale behind: you follow D=on-beat before; by having 02:08:108 - mapped as D, the suggestion at 02:07:937 - becomes more reasonable; 02:09:479 (156,157,158,159,160,161) - this bunch of notes share the same pitch (don).
Accept the above all^
The new section is starting from 02:07:937 - lol,and I think K suits 02:08:108 - more,as a result I am not going to change here :<

i.e. It is a more familiar pattern, I would say...

> From 02:56:124 - to 03:07:079 - , no 1/6 ?
The music is going calm here and it's not suitable to put 1/6(high density)notes here,therefore I put 1/4 instead

> 03:25:850 - a don can put here so that a consistent 'n n nnn n n nnn ...' can be shown.
Also add one at 03:26:194 -

> There are some 1/6 available at this session (03:18:050 - to 03:39:993 - ), not only the one at 03:33:993 - , it feels strange. All or nothing.
This section is not the most climax section in the song,so I put only few 1/6 patterns,as to emphasis the climax part(starting from 03:39:994 - onwards)by using 1/6

> 03:39:821 - there is one more note (don) right here to fill the sfx up.
sorry I think there's no sfx here :<

Okay leave all the modding stuff to Chrom.

Good luck!

Chocola_2287 wrote:

Good luck on this mapset :^)

Q____X wrote:

Hi ʕ/ ·ᴥ·ʔ/ from my modding queue.

There's a lot of mods, so i gave you just a few suggestions

[Inner Oni]
01:15:736 - 01:15:907 - Maybe put notes in that spaces? i can hear a sound here, you can put like this or this
01:15:907 -not putting it because there is a finisher after this...and 175bpm 1/4 finisher is not good
01:15:736 -not putting it because I want 01:15:907 - this note to emphasis the finisher
03:18:909 (528,529,530) - For me it's better kkd, fits more in my opinion, if you change that, you need to change 03:24:395 (568,569,570) - 03:29:881 (605,606,607) - 03:35:366 (650,651,652) -
Nice!!also change note like in 03:18:909 - to k
03:31:852 (624) - k?
03:32:709 (632) - d?
03:31:766 (623,624,625,626,627,628) - these five notes have lower pitch than 03:32:452 (629,630,631,632,633,634) - these
so I put less k in the former and more for the latter
04:49:081 (542,543) - ctrl + g?
will consider about it...

Sorry for the short mod, the map it's really good and i can't find problems.

Good luck with rank

Doyak wrote:

[Inner Oni]
* 00:30:963 - 00:31:063 - Imo there should be notes here. As you did on 00:38:963 (86,87,88) - 00:43:763 (115,116,117) - 00:50:163 (155,156,157) - you filled out these gaps when there are more vocals present. That felt just a bit of inconsistent because 00:30:963 - was the only missing vocal beat.
mapping to the sound effect here,and decide the note(k/d)by the vocal here,and I want to keep the pattern simple as n n n nnn n n here in order to keep the consistency
* 01:04:113 (244,245,246,247,248,249,250) - I'd use kdkkddk here, mainly because 01:04:659 (250,251) - felt way different from each other, and 01:04:659 - is a very shrieking sound so imo k fits better.
yep,changed
* 01:08:536 - 01:14:022 - I doubt if putting notes here was a good choice. The drums are not like that but you made it seem like it's the case, and it's just same as 01:05:793 - 01:07:164 - etc. so I don't see why only these to be different. Same for the last part too.
I see your point...but I think if I take out these notes,the pattern will be so boring and lack of continuity...but yes there's no drum sound here,I will decide it later
* 01:15:736 - Might add a k here, because it's more intense than 01:09:993 (285,286,287,288) - so I think it needs more emphasis.
change to d kkd K...
* 01:20:107 - would use a pattern with k here, as it has the highest pitch around it.
emphasis the outstanding drum sound here,no change
* 01:29:450 (465,466) - Sudden offbeat pattern? You didn't do this on any other places.
I did it on 01:18:479 - 04:04:423 - and 04:15:395 - too XD
* 01:51:395 - It's quite a clear piano sound so filling it out seems better than just using same don 1/2s when they're clearly different.
I think these two piano sounds 01:51:480 (49,50) - are too obvious and I put d d so to emphasis them
* 02:50:109 (387,388,389,390,391,392,393,394) - They should all be in 1/6. 1/4s here don't fit with anything.
yes these are 1/6 sounds,but I think putting 1/6 in a calm section,especially after a long kiai time is not suitable :l
The beatmap strain(note density)should be higher when comes the kiai time and lower when comes the calm section.
Hope you understand that the map should not judt mapped to the music elements,but we also need to consider about the whole flow and note density...
* 02:56:982 (441,442,443) - 03:01:089 (463,464,465) - 03:02:466 (470,471,472) - 03:06:574 (492,493,494) - 03:18:909 (528,529,530) - 03:19:595 (533,534,535) - 03:23:023 (561,562,563) - 03:24:395 (568,569,570) - 03:25:081 (573,574,575) - 03:28:509 (598,599,600) - 03:29:881 (605,606,607) - 03:35:366 (650,651,652) - Should be 1/6s too. I don't think 1/4s can work as a simplification of obvious 1/6 sounds. It's also inconsistent with things like 02:45:995 (352,353,354,355) - 02:46:680 (358,359,360,361) - 03:33:995 (642,643,644,645) - where you actually used 1/6s for same sounds.
Explained,and I think for this part,though the music become a little bit more intense here,but still I don't put 1/6 here because the sound effect is not so obvious.I choose to put 1/6 for the part 03:39:995 - as it is the most intense part among these three parts.
* 03:23:881 - 03:23:966 - 03:34:852 - 03:34:938 - Any reason to not map this and leave a big empty space?
Because there is no sound effect here lol
* 03:26:281 - From here there are much more clear 1/4 beats but I don't see any density change from the previous part. Repeating same pattern 03:26:109 (581,582,583) - 03:26:452 (584,585,586) - over a different part doesn't make sense as well. Imo you should just fill all obvious 1/4s out here.
I see your point,but the 1/2 sound effect is more obvious for 03:25:595 - 03:25:766 - 03:25:938 - these parts,so I decide to divide them into triplets in order to emphasis the 1/2 sound.Also I want to prevent boring because the pattern will be the same as 03:20:109 -
* 04:01:766 (145) - You could remove this note to show that the music actually has a stop there unlike 01:15:822 - . The current pattern feels too plain.
Nice suggestion,changed

I can see how the notes for the streams on the first/last kiai are constructed but they looked a bit messy for me. Mainly because there are almost no 3 or more consecutive notes with same colors, the trains looked like more of a mix of random dons and kats rather than actually creating a solid pattern that focuses on specific sounds. Also the spots you disconnected the streams are so random that it makes me wonder how you're perceiving the music and where you wanted to emphasize more than others.
Well I tried different versions,but there are different modders say I disconnect the streams so randomly...
I try to focus on both the sound effect but as well as the drum sound qwq
If you think it's so random,can you give some better suggestion?I'll be appreciate if you do that Thanks ><

That's my 2 cents, good luck~

1. -.

1. 00:45:963 (131) - change d?
2. 01:04:840 (251) - i would remove this note note for break since confuse sound when come a velocity 175bpm also for el finish imo
3. 01:23:879 (405) - change k? you map rhythm 1/1 k
4. 01:43:764 (3) - feel better k here
5. 01:47:000 (17) - d?
6. 02:01:680 - missing note? like 01:50:709 -
7. 02:10:395 (163) - change d?
8. 02:20:280 (89) - change d and 02:20:366 (90,91) - control + g? sound combine better this pattern imo
9. 02:23:452 (118) - delete and 02:23:366 (117) - cymbal strong there also
10. 02:28:338 (172) - change k?
11. 02:38:623 (275,276) - change d is sound similar in 02:38:795 (277,278) - imo
12. 02:59:349 - feel missing note here
13. 02:59:692 (456) - k? piano is low
14. 03:00:392 - same missing
15. 03:02:466 (470,471,472) - change d maybe for variation
16. 04:45:566 - add note? hear sound drums 1/4 there

Etsu wrote:

Hi o/

Taiko mod request from my queue (NM)

[General]
Circle:
d = don - D = big don
k = kat - K = big kat

1. -.

[Inner Oni]

1. 00:45:963 (131) - change d?
2. 01:04:840 (251) - i would remove this note note for break since confuse sound when come a velocity 175bpm also for el finish imo
3. 01:23:879 (405) - change k? you map rhythm 1/1 k
   I think it's better to put d here XD
4. 01:43:764 (3) - feel better k here
   I want to emphasis the high pitch piano at 01:43:936 -
5. 01:47:000 (17) - d?
   01:46:828 (16,17,18) - I think these piano sounds are similar,so I put them all k
6. 02:01:600 - missing note? like 01:50:709 -
   map by both piano and sound fx for this part,and I think putting long notes will then focus on piano more than sfx,which leads to the mapping not balance
7. 02:10:395 (163) - change d?
   I think kdkkdk is more consistent and structual here
8. 02:20:280 (89) - change d and 02:20:366 (90,91) - control + g? sound combine better this pattern imo
   02:20:109 (87,88,89,90,91) - change to kkddd
9. 02:23:452 (118) - delete and 02:23:366 (117) - cymbal strong there also
   02:23:452 - not removing this
10. 02:28:338 (172) - change k?
    02:28:338 (172,173,174) - these three notes have obvious pitch like ddk...I think changing 02:28:338 (172) to k is not good
11. 02:38:623 (275,276) - change d is sound similar in 02:38:795 (277,278) - imo
    02:38:452 (273,274,275,276) - these four notes have similar pitch ;w;
12. 02:59:349 - feel missing note here
    As the section is calm here,I want to lower the note density,and I don't want to put too much note here...just focusing on main piano sound
13. 02:59:692 (456) - k? piano is low
    already k?
14. 03:00:392 - same missing
    explained
15. 03:02:466 (470,471,472) - change d maybe for variation
    want to be consistent
16. 04:45:566 - add note? hear sound drums 1/4 there
    add k here

1. 02:38:452 (273,274,275,276) - i wanna divide them into (273,274) and (275,276) because of pitch change of the melody. i think changing 02:38:538 (274) - to d would work.
2. 02:47:880 (369,370,371,372) - according the song, 1/3 rhythm begins 02:47:880 - . therefore, 1/3 patter should be began there.
   
   image

   
3. 02:54:223 (424,425,426) - here is where the kick is spamming. why don't you use d like 02:55:423 (433,434,435,436,437) - ? i would use kdd if i were you.
4. 03:32:452 (629,630,631,632,633,634) - on this pattern, the most important point is 03:32:795 (633,634) - i feel. change 03:32:709 (632) - to d, and we can recognize that.
5. 04:01:595 (144) - clearly high sound rings here. why don't you use k at this point?
   my suggestion here. use this as refference.
   
   image

   

thzz wrote:

hi! from my queue
very sry for terrible late ;_;
i've considered what i can write as mod for a long orz

[Inner Oni]

1. 02:38:452 (273,274,275,276) - i wanna divide them into (273,274) and (275,276) because of pitch change of the melody. i think changing 02:38:538 (274) - to d would work.
   02:38:452 (273,274,275,276) - these four notes have similar pitch,that's why I put all k for them
2. 02:47:880 (369,370,371,372) - according the song, 1/3 rhythm begins 02:47:880 - . therefore, 1/3 patter should be began there.
   
   image

   
   I think it's 1/2(but I map as 1/4 for variation),I would listen to that again
3. 02:54:223 (424,425,426) - here is where the kick is spamming. why don't you use d like 02:55:423 (433,434,435,436,437) - ? i would use kdd if i were you.
   02:54:223 (424,425,426,427,428) - these five notes have higher pitch compare to 02:55:423 (433,434,435,436,437) - these notes,that's why I put k for the former
4. 03:32:452 (629,630,631,632,633,634) - on this pattern, the most important point is 03:32:795 (633,634) - i feel. change 03:32:709 (632) - to d, and we can recognize that.
   Nice!
5. 04:01:595 (144) - clearly high sound rings here. why don't you use k at this point?
   my suggestion here. use this as refference.
   
   image

   
   want to emphasis the finisher at 04:01:938 - ,but I see your point...
   I will consider about it later

that's it
good luck o/~

404 AccNotFound wrote:

( ´ ▽ ` )ﾉツ hi~
nm from my queue~


[ General ]

d = don
k = kat
D = Big don
K = Bog kat



[ Inner Oni ]

01:45:764 (12) - fit of sound, but don't know this is right for rank. i think many of modder tells to move to 01:45:822, and i also too xD
I think it's lie on 01:45:779 - (the 1/8),but nvm just change it XD
02:32:709 (216) - delete. no sound is here, and this is the connecting part from 1/6 to 1/4, so for make little less hard.
nice find ,removed
02:49:509 (381) - delete? also mo sound, and little rest time before start 1/6.
I think it's climax here,I think I won't delete it but I will change to k to emphasis high pitch
02:49:766 (383,384,385,386) - kkkd to follow synth.
I think kkdk suits the music better
02:50:366 (391,392) - ctrl g? not to follow pitch of synth sound, matched drum snare.
map by melody here,and I think dkddk fits better XDD
pitch imo -> 02:50:280 (390) > 02:50:366 (391). i can't tell my 100% thought with English, sorry ww



that's all for me
go rank hurry !

Arrival wrote:

eeeee

01:15:394 - dk seems necessary here considering the sound of 01:15:480 (321) - and the fact that this is a build up.
ok
01:15:994 - What I dislike in the kiai time is the omnipresence of offbeat patterning that actually flow pretty poorly. Deleting notes such as 01:17:108 (334) - 01:19:851 (361) - would make it a bit better playability wise
removed ,will also consider the structure of this part too
01:47:881 (20) - Very weird, I feel like this note is offbeat by a few ms.
will confirm this part with Skylish
Ok tbh this WHOLE part feels completely offbeat, 01:46:144 (12) - after this offset, every note feels late, try giving it -5ms.
^
ok so the song is actually recorded with the ass so you'll need a really precise timing check, that I can't provide. Although I'll try to find a solution, you should look for some other mp3 files
BLAMEDJTAKA XDD,I will check the timing with Skylish soon
01:59:539 (96,97) - kkk triplet here fore some kind of emphsasis would fit well
ok
02:09:824 (159) - k here is crucial for a good flow of the 1/3 tbh
want to emphasis the strong beat of 02:09:596 (159,160,161,162,163) - these,by using d.
And also they have same pitch too
02:21:396 (99) - Move this note to 02:21:739 (102) - for a better flow and a better representation of the song
I think 1/4+1/3+1/4 is not good ;w;
02:33:396 - Why isn't it a full stream ? There is clealy a sound here and since you have a 1/1 break at 02:34:167 - this would definetly be more suitable
ok changed
02:38:624 (274) - d here for stream flow and musical fitting since its a downbeat
emm temporarily accepted,will seek for skylish's opinion
02:55:424 (432,433,434,435) - how about dk kd ?
don't fit the music at all
03:41:796 - I would add a note here and this one 03:41:967 (699) -
but not to me sorry...
04:27:396 (400) - I'd delete this note and make this part 04:28:339 - / 04:29:367 - like this
instead I apply this at 04:39:996 - ,I think it comes to the near end of the music part,that's why I put kkk D to emphasis the music here
04:41:710 (498) - Why is it a K although the same sound here 04:40:339 (490) - is a D ? I'd change it to a D and put a kkk triplet before to keep consistency and adding emphasis.
didn't fit at all :<

That's all for now

103423,-105.263157894737,4,1,0,70,0,0
104108,348.837209302326,4,1,0,70,1,8
104108,-103.092783505155,4,1,0,70,0,0
104456,337.078651685393,4,1,0,70,1,8
104456,-107.52688172043,4,1,0,70,0,0
104793,337.078651685393,4,1,0,70,1,0
104793,-107.52688172043,4,1,0,70,0,0
105467,340.909090909091,4,1,0,70,1,8
105467,-105.263157894737,4,1,0,70,0,0
105807,342.857142857143,4,1,0,70,1,8
105807,-105.263157894737,4,1,0,70,0,0
106149,340.909090909091,4,1,0,70,1,0
106149,-105.263157894737,4,1,0,70,0,0
106489,361.44578313253,4,1,0,70,1,8
106669,337.078651685393,4,1,0,70,1,8
106669,-107.52688172043,4,1,0,70,0,0
106837,365.853658536585,4,1,0,70,1,8
106837,-99.009900990099,4,1,0,70,0,0
107019,359.281437125748,4,1,0,70,1,8
107198,344.827586206897,4,1,0,70,1,8
107198,-104.166666666667,4,1,0,70,0,0
107370,326.086956521739,4,1,0,70,1,8
107370,-111.111111111111,4,1,0,70,0,0
107535,361.44578313253,4,1,0,70,1,0
107896,329.67032967033,4,1,0,70,1,8
107896,-109.89010989011,4,1,0,70,0,0
108225,342.857142857143,4,1,0,70,1,8
108225,-105.263157894737,4,1,0,70,0,0
108910,342.857142857143,4,1,0,70,1,0
108910,-105.263157894737,4,1,0,70,0,0
114395,-100,4,1,0,80,0,8

Skylish wrote:

As requested for timing check, NO KDS

[General]

* Refer to what you tagged me only

> 02:38:624 - I agree that a d here can improve the flow, but it is irrelevant with the down-beat (as it is the 2nd beat of a bar, which belongs to a weak beat, not even an on beat of course)

[Timing]

! 01:45:780 - this note is wrongly snapped in 1/8, it should be more accurate in 1/12 at 01:45:794 - (<--- IT IS STILL INCORRECT). When you notice that you need to shift beat snapper, you should figure out there are BPM shifting.

! You are following 175X0.95= 166.25 BPM from 01:43:423 - to 01:54:396 -


* You MUST check un-snapped objects and SV(green timing points) by yourself. I figured a lot of them when I had finished the latest timing.*

ALL Additional timing points you need from 01:43:423 - to 01:54:395 - (there's already 1 ms shifting) as below, including SV fixes and omittion of first barlines:

103423,-105.263157894737,4,1,0,70,0,0
104108,348.837209302326,4,1,0,70,1,8
104108,-103.092783505155,4,1,0,70,0,0
104456,337.078651685393,4,1,0,70,1,8
104456,-107.52688172043,4,1,0,70,0,0
104793,337.078651685393,4,1,0,70,1,0
104793,-107.52688172043,4,1,0,70,0,0
105467,340.909090909091,4,1,0,70,1,8
105467,-105.263157894737,4,1,0,70,0,0
105807,342.857142857143,4,1,0,70,1,8
105807,-105.263157894737,4,1,0,70,0,0
106149,340.909090909091,4,1,0,70,1,0
106149,-105.263157894737,4,1,0,70,0,0
106489,361.44578313253,4,1,0,70,1,8
106669,337.078651685393,4,1,0,70,1,8
106669,-107.52688172043,4,1,0,70,0,0
106837,365.853658536585,4,1,0,70,1,8
106837,-99.009900990099,4,1,0,70,0,0
107019,359.281437125748,4,1,0,70,1,8
107198,344.827586206897,4,1,0,70,1,8
107198,-104.166666666667,4,1,0,70,0,0
107370,326.086956521739,4,1,0,70,1,8
107370,-111.111111111111,4,1,0,70,0,0
107535,361.44578313253,4,1,0,70,1,0
107896,329.67032967033,4,1,0,70,1,8
107896,-109.89010989011,4,1,0,70,0,0
108225,342.857142857143,4,1,0,70,1,8
108225,-105.263157894737,4,1,0,70,0,0
108910,342.857142857143,4,1,0,70,1,0
108910,-105.263157894737,4,1,0,70,0,0
114395,-100,4,1,0,80,0,8

Preview of timing:



Skylish's Timing: https://puu.sh/vGvkW/788a7eba90.rar

[]

If you've still got timing problems, feel free to find me

Skylish wrote:

quick check b4 Arrival re-bubble, NO KDS

[ELPIS]

> 02:26:539 (152,153) - ctrl+G (d k)to have a consistant k flow at 02:25:938 - / 02:26:195 - / 02:26:452 - and 02:26:624 - / 02:26:881 - / 02:27:138 - ? 3/2 kat pattern is expected.
want to express the pitch here rather than following consistency
> 02:32:452 - another consistent k
^same as above,k doesn't fit the music well
> 02:55:767 - consider change it to k for a variated pattern? 02:55:424 (433,434,435,436) - dd dd seems a bit bored and does not show the presence of melody pitch at 02:55:767 - , while you did it well at 02:54:739 (429,430,431,432) - .
I map by drum for 02:54:739 (429,430,431,432,433,434,435,436,437,438) - these notes,which I think dd dk don't suit the drum sound at all
> 03:25:596 - the strucutre here should be similar to 03:20:110 - . A stream is forseen, considering consistency. Same stream used would be fine imo because you have enough variation尸 for the other triplets.
it'd be repetitive :<
> 04:04:424 - how about shifting it 1/4 forward to 04:04:510 - ? Having a weak beat ending is strange and inconsistent with your mapping style.
emm...at the beginning I thought following the sound effect would be better,but yes I should follow the mapping style more consistently,changed
> 04:15:396 - ^ same as above, this time is 04:15:482 - . No wonder when I try to testplay te stream, I feel the breaking point is strange.
ok
> 04:09:739 (222,223) - ctrl+G to promote a constant k for drum kick in this first half of this Kiai section.
ctrl+G doesn't fit the music pitch at all,and it need not to be constant for all the time lul
> 04:10:167 - another constant k for every '5-plet' at 04:10:167 - / 04:10:682 - / 04:11:196 -
want to develop the melody by putting more k at the high pitch places
> 04:21:139 - ^ same advice
same as above
> 04:45:824 - the strong base drum here has a lower dynamic comparing with the previous 85% section. Consider to put a 70% right here?

> 04:45:910 - similar case as above, it sounds too strong and the contrast of volume between 04:45:910 - and 04:51:396 - are unnecessarily huge. Try using 60% at 04:45:910 - .
accepted the above two
[]

Currently that's all, reply my little mod and find Arrival.

Arrival wrote:

Okay timing seems fine and the diff looks ready. Good luck !

#1

Surono wrote:

donkatkatdonkatkatdon(repeating) intensifies
really love the drum emphasis of this map and someth-
nvm, i lazy to continue say it ww
#2